Next Article in Journal
A Two-Stage Generative Architecture for Renewable Scenario Generation Based on Temporal Scenario Representation and Diffusion Models
Previous Article in Journal
A Physical-Based Electro-Thermal Model for a Prismatic LFP Lithium-Ion Cell Thermal Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China
2
Sichuan Provincial Key Lab of Process Equipment and Control, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Yibin 644000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(5), 1280; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280
Submission received: 10 February 2025 / Revised: 25 February 2025 / Accepted: 3 March 2025 / Published: 5 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section E: Electric Vehicles)

Abstract

An efficient energy management strategy (EMS) is crucial for the energy-saving and emission-reduction effects of electric vehicles. Research on deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-driven energy management systems (EMSs) has made significant strides in the global automotive industry. However, most scholars study only the impact of a single DRL algorithm on EMS performance, ignoring the potential improvement in optimization objectives that different DRL algorithms can offer under the same benchmark. This paper focuses on the control strategy of hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) comprising lithium-ion batteries and ultracapacitors. Firstly, an equivalent model of the HESS is established based on dynamic experiments. Secondly, a regulated decision-making framework is constructed by uniformly setting the action space, state space, reward function, and hyperparameters of the agent for different DRL algorithms. To compare the control performances of the HESS under various EMSs, the regulation properties are analyzed with the standard driving cycle condition. Finally, the simulation results indicate that the EMS powered by a deep Q network (DQN) markedly diminishes the detrimental impact of peak current on the battery. Furthermore, the EMS based on a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) reduces energy loss by 28.3%, and the economic efficiency of the EMS based on dynamic programming (DP) is improved to 0.7%.
Keywords: hybrid energy storage system; energy management strategy; deep reinforcement learning; energy loss hybrid energy storage system; energy management strategy; deep reinforcement learning; energy loss

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, W.; Huang, H.; Wang, C.; Xia, S.; Gao, X. A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods. Energies 2025, 18, 1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280

AMA Style

Xu W, Huang H, Wang C, Xia S, Gao X. A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods. Energies. 2025; 18(5):1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Wenna, Hao Huang, Chun Wang, Shuai Xia, and Xinmei Gao. 2025. "A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods" Energies 18, no. 5: 1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280

APA Style

Xu, W., Huang, H., Wang, C., Xia, S., & Gao, X. (2025). A Comparative Study of Energy Management Strategies for Battery-Ultracapacitor Electric Vehicles Based on Different Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods. Energies, 18(5), 1280. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop