Text Correction
There was an error in the original publication [1]. The mistake was due to incorrectly indicating the “first derivative” of the bending deflection instead of the second derivative.
A correction has been made to 5. Fatigue Analysis, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence:
The bending curvature of the cable is obtained step-by-step as a second spatial derivative of the bending deflection starting from the time histories of the displacements of the two nodes adjacent to the focused location.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Error in Figures
In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The mistake was due to an error in indicating the units of y-axis. The corrected Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1.
Stress–strain constitutive relationship of the cable.
In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 7. The mistake was due to an error in presenting the calculations made in the Matlab routine. The corrected Figure 7 appears below.
Figure 7.
Fatigue analysis of dynamic electrical cable.
Reference
- Sobhaniasl, M.; Petrini, F.; Karimirad, M.; Bontempi, F. Fatigue Life Assessment for Power Cables in Floating Offshore Wind Turbines. Energies 2020, 13, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).