This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model
by
Wenlong Zhang
Wenlong Zhang 1 and
Ziwei Ma
Ziwei Ma
Dr. Ziwei Ma, Senior Engineer, Registered Electrical Engineer, obtained a Bachelor's degree in from [...]
Dr. Ziwei Ma, Senior Engineer, Registered Electrical Engineer, obtained a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering from Xi'an Jiaotong University, China, in 2001; a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Xi'an Jiaotong University, China, in 2007; and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Universiti Putra Malaysia in 2025. From 2001 to 2004, he was engaged in the
maintenance of automated equipment at Ningbo Cigarette Factory in China. From 2007 to 2017, he worked on power system design engineering at Yunnan Electric Power Design Institute in China. Since 2017, he has been engaged in teaching
and research at the College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Yunnan Agricultural University, China. His main research areas are lightning protection, multiphysics coupling calculation, and power system planning.
2,*
1
PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 310030, China
2
Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(23), 6271; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 October 2025
/
Revised: 22 November 2025
/
Accepted: 25 November 2025
/
Published: 28 November 2025
Abstract
Traditional ampacity evaluation methods for direct burial cables, like the correction factor method and the IEC 60287 analytical method, suffer from large calculation errors when dealing with complex installation environments. This paper investigated the influence of multiple environmental factors and proximity effects on the ampacity of 35 kV YJLV22-26/35 3 × 400 mm2 direct burial cables using an electro-thermal-fluid coupling FEM model. The results indicate that when accounting for surface temperature and burial depth, the correction factor method may overestimate ampacity by up to 7%, while the analytical method may underestimate it by up to 24%. When soil thermal resistance variations are considered, the correction factor method could overestimate ampacity by 14%, whereas the analytical method may underestimate it by 10%. Due to neglecting solar radiation and air convection effects, these two methods can introduce calculation errors of 23% and 34%, respectively. The ampacity of multi-circuit parallel configurations increases with greater circuit spacing. Based on FEM simulation results, a new dynamic ampacity evaluation method has been proposed that comprehensively considers multiple environmental variables including ambient temperature, burial depth, soil thermal resistivity, solar radiation intensity, wind speed, the number of parallel circuits, and circuit spacing. This method can be directly applied to guide engineering design.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zhang, W.; Ma, Z.
A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model. Energies 2025, 18, 6271.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271
AMA Style
Zhang W, Ma Z.
A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model. Energies. 2025; 18(23):6271.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zhang, Wenlong, and Ziwei Ma.
2025. "A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model" Energies 18, no. 23: 6271.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271
APA Style
Zhang, W., & Ma, Z.
(2025). A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model. Energies, 18(23), 6271.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.