Next Article in Journal
Energy Storage Configuration in Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle: An Analysis on a Real Urban Mission Profile
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Taxonomy and Energy Efficiency Analysis in the Aluminium Industry Using Industry 4.0 Technologies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Distribution-Level PV Representative Bands: Blockwise BGMM and NSGA-II for Coverage and Tail-Risk

by
Geonho Kim
1 and
Jun-Hyeok Kim
2,*
1
Smart Power Distribution Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Corporation Research Institute, Daejeon 34056, Republic of Korea
2
School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(23), 6134; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236134 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 November 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 23 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section F1: Electrical Power System)

Abstract

Power system planning requires reliable information about feeder-level photovoltaic (PV) variability, but point forecasts are often uncertain. This study proposes a procedure for constructing explainable, frequency-aware representative bands for daily PV output at the feeder section level. The method segments the annual PV series into homogeneous periods, derives reference shapes from probabilistically clustered daily profiles, and selects an upper band that balances coverage, shape fidelity, and upper tail risk through multi-objective optimization. Validation on real feeder data shows that the bands enclose frequent and recent shapes (average weighted coverage ≈ 0.85), limit upward exceedances (≈0.06), and remain compact. The approach supports practical threshold and reserve planning and provides a transparent complement to point forecasts by emphasizing typical operating regimes while remaining cautious about extremes.
Keywords: photovoltaic; distribution networks; representative profiles; BGMM; NSGA-II; coverage metrics; PICP; exceedance risk; dynamic time warping photovoltaic; distribution networks; representative profiles; BGMM; NSGA-II; coverage metrics; PICP; exceedance risk; dynamic time warping

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, G.; Kim, J.-H. Distribution-Level PV Representative Bands: Blockwise BGMM and NSGA-II for Coverage and Tail-Risk. Energies 2025, 18, 6134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236134

AMA Style

Kim G, Kim J-H. Distribution-Level PV Representative Bands: Blockwise BGMM and NSGA-II for Coverage and Tail-Risk. Energies. 2025; 18(23):6134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Geonho, and Jun-Hyeok Kim. 2025. "Distribution-Level PV Representative Bands: Blockwise BGMM and NSGA-II for Coverage and Tail-Risk" Energies 18, no. 23: 6134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236134

APA Style

Kim, G., & Kim, J.-H. (2025). Distribution-Level PV Representative Bands: Blockwise BGMM and NSGA-II for Coverage and Tail-Risk. Energies, 18(23), 6134. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop