Next Article in Journal
Electrospun Fabrication of 1–3-Type PVP/SbSI and PVP/SbSeI Nanocomposites with Excellent Piezoelectric Properties for Nanogenerators and Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
A Fault Diagnosis Method for Excitation Transformers Based on HPO-DBN and Multi-Source Heterogeneous Information Fusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Load Statistics of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Gaussian Mixture Model for Charging Strategy Optimization in Electric Power Distribution Systems

1
Hubei Engineering Research Center for Safety Monitoring of New Energy and Power Grid Equipment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
2
State Grid Wuhan Electric Power Supply Company, Wuhan 430013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(20), 5504; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205504
Submission received: 15 September 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 18 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section E: Electric Vehicles)

Abstract

The rapidly growing demand of electric vehicle (EV) charging is one of the main challenges to modern electrical distribution systems. Accurate modelling of the EV charging load is crucial for charging load prediction and optimization. However, previous methods based on the charging behaviors of private EVs are hard to collect user’s private data. In this study, charging load data from 962 charging and battery swapping stations (CBSSs), classified into dedicated charging stations, public charging stations, and battery swapping stations, collected during 2021–2022, are analyzed to investigate seasonal variations in the charging coincidence factor. A data-driven probabilistic model of charging load, based on the Gaussian Mixture Model, is developed to address various scenarios, including new station construction, capacity expansions, and optimized charging strategies. This model is applicable to different types of CBSSs. A real-world 10 kV feeder system is employed as a case study to validate the model, and a delayed charging strategy is proposed. The results demonstrate that the proposed model accurately estimates charging load peaks after new construction and expansion in 2023, with an error rate under 3%. Furthermore, the delayed charging strategy achieved a 24.79% reduction in maximum load and a 31.96% decrease in the peak–valley difference. Its implementation in the real-world feeder significantly alleviated nighttime overloading in 2024.
Keywords: data-driven; EV charging and battery swapping station load; gaussian mixture model; charging strategy optimization; electrical distribution system data-driven; EV charging and battery swapping station load; gaussian mixture model; charging strategy optimization; electrical distribution system

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, S.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Seasonal Load Statistics of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Gaussian Mixture Model for Charging Strategy Optimization in Electric Power Distribution Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 5504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205504

AMA Style

Wu S, Li H, Wang H. Seasonal Load Statistics of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Gaussian Mixture Model for Charging Strategy Optimization in Electric Power Distribution Systems. Energies. 2025; 18(20):5504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Shengcong, Hang Li, and Hang Wang. 2025. "Seasonal Load Statistics of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Gaussian Mixture Model for Charging Strategy Optimization in Electric Power Distribution Systems" Energies 18, no. 20: 5504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205504

APA Style

Wu, S., Li, H., & Wang, H. (2025). Seasonal Load Statistics of EV Charging and Battery Swapping Stations Based on Gaussian Mixture Model for Charging Strategy Optimization in Electric Power Distribution Systems. Energies, 18(20), 5504. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop