Next Article in Journal
UAV and 3D Modeling for Automated Rooftop Parameter Analysis and Photovoltaic Performance Estimation
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Audit of Road Lighting Installations as a Tool for Improving Efficiency and Visual Safety Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emission of Total Volatile Organic Compounds from the Torrefaction Process: Meadow Hay, Rye, and Oat Straw as Renewable Fuels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Cherry Stone Addition to Sawdust on the Pelletization Process and Fuel Pellet Quality

by
Sławomir Obidziński
1,
Paweł Cwalina
1,
Małgorzata Kowczyk-Sadowy
1,*,
Aneta Sienkiewicz
1,
Jacek Mazur
2 and
Paweł Braun
3
1
Department of Agri-Food Engineering and Environmental Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Białystok, Poland
2
Department of Food Engineering and Machines, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głębocka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
3
DAK-POL Sp. z o.o., Tartaczna 7, 16-020 Czarna Białostocka, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(20), 5356; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205356 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 August 2025 / Revised: 19 September 2025 / Accepted: 9 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025

Abstract

This study presents the results of research on the pelleting process of pine sawdust with the addition of cherry stone waste, which was carried out using a flat-die pellet press in the context of fuel pellet production. The findings indicate that increasing the proportion of crushed cherry stones in the sawdust mixture from 10% to 20% reduced the pelletizer’s power demand by approximately 14% (from 3.35 to 2.86 kW) and by around 24% (from 3.79 to 2.86 kW), compared with the compaction of sawdust alone. The incorporation of 10% crushed cherry stone waste into pine sawdust slightly improved the kinetic strength of the pellets, increasing it by about 2% (from 94.6 to 96.60%). However, raising the cherry stone content further to 20% resulted in a moderate decrease in kinetic strength, by approximately 5% (from 96.60 to 91.37%). A similar trend was observed for pellet density: the addition of cherry stones (10–20%) slightly reduced the density by about 5.5% (from 1312.02 to 1241.65 kg·m−3), accompanied by a small decrease in bulk density. This study also confirmed the high calorific potential of crushed cherry stones, with a heat of combustion of 24.418 MJ·kg−1 (dry basis) and a net calorific value of 22.326 MJ·kg−1. Their incorporation at levels of 10–20% into sawdust mixtures increased the heat of combustion of the pellets by 0.42–0.84% (from 19.959 MJ·kg−1 for sawdust alone at 15% moisture content to 20.042 MJ·kg−1 with a 10% addition and 20.126 MJ·kg−1 with a 20% addition). Moreover, the inclusion of cherry stone waste in the mixture had a beneficial effect on combustion performance, lowering emissions of harmful compounds such as CO, NO, and SO2, due to the higher combustion temperature achieved. Consequently, the use of cherry stone waste as an additive to sawdust not only enhances the energetic and environmental performance of pellets but also provides an effective pathway for the management of large quantities of fruit industry residues.

1. Introduction

The obligation to support the development of renewable energy sources results from the provisions of EU directives, including Directive 2023/2413 (RED III) on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable sources in the internal electricity market [1]. Pursuant to the Directive, Member States are required to increase the share of renewable energy sources in final energy consumption to at least 42.5% by 2030, with an additional indicative target of 45%. This Directive also introduces new targets for individual economic sectors in terms of obtaining energy from renewable sources. In Poland, the use of waste for the production of energy from renewable sources is regulated primarily by the Act of 20 February 2015 on renewable energy sources (Journal of Laws 2024, item 1361) [2], which defines plant and animal waste from all industrial sectors, including the agri-food industry, as biomass, which can be used as fuel for the production of electricity, heat or biogas/biomethane.
According to Bioenergy Europe, domestic pellet production in the European Union (EU27) increased from 19.83 million tons in 2021 to over 20.5 million tons in 2022 [3]. Despite numerous challenges, including a reduction in heating demand due to climate change, Europe remains the world’s largest region producing and using wood pellets. Currently, over 80% of the raw materials used in European pellets are sawmill residues, including sawdust and shavings. It is becoming necessary to use other plant materials to maintain the economic attractiveness of this fuel and meet the growing demand. In addition to wood waste, other waste materials are increasingly being used in pellet production, including fruit and vegetable industry waste, which, according to Żary-Sikorska [4], is generated in Poland annually at approximately 10 million tons. These wastes come mainly from the processing of potatoes, apples, and sugar beets. Flejszman et al. [5] assumed that at least 20% to 50% of the plant raw material entering production processes becomes waste, which should then be managed. Waste from the fruit and vegetable industry is used, among others, to produce biogas and high-quality biofertilizers, compost, biopolymers, biodegradable packaging, and bioactive compounds [6,7,8,9].
One method of managing waste is to process it through pressure agglomeration (pelletization, densification) into pellets or briquettes [10,11,12,13]. Waste pelletization facilitates transport and storage of the material by increasing its bulk density. This process also allows for the use of the obtained fuel in installations with an automatic feeding system. Furthermore, densification enables the development of a product composed of two or more components, providing considerable flexibility in shaping the properties of the final fuel [14].
Arulprakasajothi et al. [10] conducted research on the production of pellets from biomass derived from fruit and vegetable market waste. The obtained pellets meet ecological fuel standards in terms of both physicochemical properties and energy suitability. Additionally, lower pellet production costs provide a potential and environmentally friendly fuel for energy generation. In a study conducted by Gholami Banadkoki et al. [15], pelletization of leaves from six vegetable crops, including tomatoes, eggplants, zucchini, cucumbers, corn, and soybeans, was investigated to assess their potential as bioenergy raw materials. The physicochemical properties of these biomasses, such as particle size and shape, lignin content, and elemental composition, were examined to assess their effect on pellet density and strength [15]. Obidziński et al. [14] assessed the effect of adding potato pulp to pine sawdust on the pelletization process and the properties of the obtained fuel pellets, taking into account both laboratory and industrial tests. It was found that potato pulp acts as a natural binder, improving the pelletization process (lower energy, higher strength). Chojnacki et al. [16], producing pellets from post-industrial waste generated during the production of apple, carrot, and beetroot juice, noted the effect of these wastes on the pellet mass density, pellet hardness, ash content and calorific value. Additionally, they found that higher proportions of additives and higher moisture content in the raw materials influenced the hardness and density of the obtained pellet. Hejft et al. [17] presented the results of research on the pelletization process of oat bran and apple pomace. The study determined a significant effect of the apple pomace content (10%, 15%, and 20%) in the mixture with oat bran and the effect of the pomace type on the energy consumption of the device and the kinetic stability of the obtained pellets. In turn, Kraiem et al. [18] conducted experiments on the densification and combustion of pellets from sawdust with the addition of tomato and grape marl production residues (in a 1:1 ratio). They observed a high calorific value of this fuel and increased NOx and SOx emissions for the combustion technology used. Kang et al. [19] investigated characteristics of spent coffee ground as a fuel and combustion characteristics in a small boiler system, such as CO, NOx, O2 and heating characteristics of heating boiler. The high quality of coffee grounds as a fuel is also confirmed by Allesina et al. [20], giving a high heating value.
Poland is a leading cherry producer in the European Union. According to Nowicka et al. [21], on average 70% of the domestic cherry harvest goes to processing plants, where it is used to produce frozen foods, concentrates, juices, nectars, jams, preserves, and alcoholic beverages. Considering that cherry stones constitute from 8% to 15% of the total fruit weight, depending on the variety [22], tens of thousands of tons of this type of waste are generated worldwide each year, which is currently used to a small extent. Cherry stones are extensively studied, among other things, as a raw material for construction materials [23] and filtration materials [24,25], as well as an antioxidant product that can be used in healthcare, cosmetics, and packaging applications [26]. Kniepkamp et al. [27] showed that cherry stone waste could also serve as feedstock for lipid extraction. This paper presents the results of an assessment of the potential of agri-food waste, specifically cherry stones, as raw material for the production of high-quality wood pellets. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of varying the proportion of cherry stones on the pressure agglomeration process of pine sawdust and on the quality of the resulting pellets. This work is innovative because, for the first time, it allows for the determination of the optimal cherry stones content in solid biofuels produced from wood waste, taking into account the preservation of their physical (mechanical) and energy properties, while also potentially reducing the costs of electricity generation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The primary raw material used in this study consisted of former production residues (sawdust, shavings, and cuttings) obtained from the “DAK-POL” plant company and crushed cherry stones supplied by C.K. Frost Sp. z o.o. (Śmiłowice, Poland) (Figure 1).

2.2. Moisture of the Tested Raw Materials

The moisture content of the raw materials—sawdust and mixtures of sawdust with crushed cherry stones—was determined prior to the densification process in accordance with the PN-EN ISO 18134-3:2023-12 standard [28]. Measurements were carried out using an AXIS ASG laboratory moisture analyzer (AXIS, Gdańsk, Poland).

2.3. Granulometric Distribution of Tested Raw Materials

The granulometric distribution of the raw materials (sawdust and crushed cherry stones) was analyzed using a Multiserv Morek LPz-2e programmable sieve shaker equipped with a set of sieves (Multiserv Morek, Marcyporęba, Poland), in accordance with the PN-R-64798:2009 standard [29]. A series of nine sieves with square mesh sizes of 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.063 mm was employed.

2.4. Elementary Composition Analysis of Raw Materials

The elemental composition of the waste materials was determined using a CHN628 analyzer (St. Joseph, MI, USA). The carbon and hydrogen contents in dry biomass were measured by high-temperature combustion with infrared (IR) detection, while nitrogen was quantified using the katharometric method, in accordance with PN-EN ISO 16948:2015-07 standard [30], based on a 0.1 g sample. Sulfur content was determined by high-temperature combustion with IR detection according to PN-EN ISO 16994:2016-10 standard [31], using a 0.3 g sample. The instrument operates on a combustion principle and reports results in weight percent or parts per million (ppm).

2.5. Density and Bulk Density of the Tested Raw Materials and Pellets

The density of the pellets was determined 24 h after removal from the compaction chamber. For this purpose, the height and diameter of 15 randomly selected pellets were measured using a caliper with an accuracy of ±0.02 mm, while their mass was determined with an OHAUS AX324M laboratory balance (OHAUS Europe GmbH, Nanikon, Switzerland) with an accuracy of ±0.0001 g. Pellet density was calculated as the ratio of mass to volume.
The bulk density of sawdust, crushed cherry stones, and pellets was determined using a metal cylinder with a volume of 407.5 cm3, a laboratory balance (AX324M, OHAUS Europe GmbH, Nanikon, Switzerland), and a steel scraper. The procedure was carried out in accordance with the PN-EN ISO 17830:2016-07 standard [32].

2.6. Pelleting Process of Sawdust and Crushed Cherry Stones

Following the determination of the physicochemical properties, mixtures of sawdust and crushed cherry stones were prepared, containing 10%, 15%, and 20% cherry stone content. After adjusting the moisture content to 16%, the mixtures were placed in sealed containers and stored for 24 h to prevent water evaporation.
Pelletization was carried out using an SS-4 system with a P-300 pelletizer (Protechnika, Łuków, Poland), equipped with a Y132M electric motor (7.5 kW, 1440 rpm) and roller compactors, according to the methodology described in previous authors study [33].
The pelleting system was fitted with a flat die with 6 mm diameter holes and a working gap of 0.4 mm between the rollers and the die socket. The pellets obtained were cooled under ambient conditions for 24 h before further testing. The tests were carried out at a rotational speed of the compaction roller system of 270 rpm and a mass flow rate of the raw material through the working system of 50 kg·h−1.

2.7. Kinetic Strength of Pellets

Twenty-four hours after exiting the pelletizing system, the kinetic strength (durability) of the pellets was determined using a Holmen tester. The tests were carried out in accordance with PN-EN ISO 17831-1:2016-02 standard [34] and following the methodology described in previous study [33]. In the Holmen method, a 100 g pellet sample is introduced into the test chamber, where it is set in motion by an air stream, causing circulation within the chamber and repeated collisions with the perforated metal walls of the tester. The pellets remained in the test chamber for 60 s. After this period, the remaining material was collected, sieved, and weighed. The kinetic durability was calculated as the ratio of pellet mass after the test to the initial sample mass.

2.8. Calorific Value and Heat of Combustion

The calorific value and heat of combustion of the raw materials were determined in accordance with PN–EN ISO 1928:2002 standard [35] and following the methodology described in previous authors work [33], using a KL–12M calorimeter (PRECYZJA-BIT, Bydgoszcz, Poland). The calorific value (Qas), taking into account the contents of volatile matter, moisture, ash, and sulfur entered into the calorimeter’s software.

2.9. Combustion Tests of Produced Pellets

Combustion tests were performed using a 10 kW automatic-feed boiler designed for wood pellets and equipped with a refractory steel retort burner with multi-level air inlets to improve combustion efficiency. The fuel was transported from the hopper to the burner by a screw feeder, while the flue gases passed through a heat exchanger to the chimney, assisted by a fan supplying combustion air. The boiler controller automatically adjusted the fuel and air supply based on oxygen concentration measurements obtained from a lambda probe.
The tests were conducted under nominal operating conditions following a one-hour preheating period. The flue gas composition at the boiler outlet was measured using a SIEMENS analyzer system: ULTRAMAT 23 (for CO, CO2, SO2, NO, NO2, and HCl, by the IR reference method) and OXYMAT 5 (for O2, paramagnetic reference method, 0–25% range). Continuous sampling was performed using a heated probe with a ceramic filter, a heated hose, and a gas conditioning unit.
Additional tests were carried out in a 5th-class retort grate boiler under manual control, where both pellets and cherry stones were combusted. The fuel feed rate was maintained at 2.0 kg·h−1, with constant airflow to the combustion chamber. The boiler water temperature was kept within the range of 65–70 °C, in accordance with standard biomass combustion testing procedures.
The concentrations of the analyzed flue gas components (CO2, CO, NO, SO2, and HCl) were normalized to 10% oxygen (O2) content using Equation (1) [33]:
Z s 2 = 21 O 2 ( 21 O 2 ) · Z s 1   [ % ,   mg · m 3 ]
where
Zs1—actual content of the chemical compound in the exhaust gas [%, mg·m−3],
Zs2—content of the chemical compound in the exhaust gas for a given oxygen content [%, mg·m−3],
O2′—set oxygen content in the exhaust gas [%],
O2″—actual oxygen content in the exhaust gas [%].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The results of the raw material tests are presented as mean values with standard deviations, calculated from five replicates. The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to verify the normality of data distribution, and all analyzed variables met the assumption of normality. Pearson correlation coefficients were then calculated for the entire dataset to identify relationships among the analyzed variables. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05. The results are presented in the form of a correlation matrix and a principal component analysis (PCA) plot. Correlation coefficients greater than 0.8 or lower than −0.8 were considered strong correlations.
Additionally, the sum of the absolute values of the correlation coefficients was calculated to provide an aggregated measure of the overall influence of each variable on the others in the dataset. PCA was performed to model the relationships among variables, and the final biplot was constructed based on two principal components (PC1 and PC2), which together explained 99.0% of the total variance. All statistical analyses and visualizations were carried out using Statistica 13.3 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Moisture of the Tested Raw Materials

Table 1 presents the moisture content of pine sawdust and cherry stones, determined using an AXIS ASG laboratory moisture analyzer.
The average moisture content of cherry stones was approximately 4.3%, while pine sawdust exhibited an average moisture content of about 8.4%. From the perspective of the pelletization process, the moisture content of sawdust was too low. Therefore, additional water or another moisture-enhancing component is required when processing sawdust of such low humidity. The inclusion of crushed cherry stones did not increase the overall moisture content of the mixture, indicating the necessity of external supplementation with water or another component that raises the moisture level.
According to Serrano et al. [36], the optimal initial moisture content for pellet production from barley straw should be in the range of 19–23%, while the recommended value after pelletization is 6–8%.
Jiang et al. [37] investigated the effect of moisture content on pellet formation and properties using three different biomass types (pine sawdust, corn straw, and peanut shell). They found optimal values of 12% for both pine sawdust and corn straw, and 14% for peanut shells.
Similarly, Matkowski et al. [38], studying pelletization of wheat straw and its mixtures with cassava starch or calcium carbonate (using a flat die with an open chamber and 8 mm opening diameter), reported that the highest single-pellet density was achieved at a mixture moisture content of 23% (w.b.).

3.2. Granulometric Distribution of Tested Raw Materials

The granulometric distribution of sawdust and cherry stones particles obtained from sieve analysis is presented in Figure 2. The dominant fraction in the sawdust was 0.50 mm, accounting for 30.64% of the total. Slightly lower proportions were observed for the 1.00 mm (26.47%), 0.25 mm (17.35%), and 2.00 mm (11.11%) fractions. The smallest proportion, 0.09%, corresponded to the undersized fraction below 0.063 mm.
The predominant fraction in the cherry stones was 1.00 mm, which represented 61.75%. Smaller contributions were recorded for the 0.50 mm (13.47%), 0.25 mm (12.45%), 2.00 mm (7.14%), and 0.125 mm (4.71%) fractions. The smallest fraction, 0.1%, was observed at 0.063 mm. Owing to the oil content of cherry stones, clogging of the analyzer sieves was observed, which prevented the detection of undersized particles smaller than 0.063 mm. Figure 3 illustrates the morphology of the individual sawdust fractions, while Figure 4 presents the morphology of the respective crushed cherry stone fractions after sieve analysis.

3.3. Elementary Composition Analysis of Raw Materials

The results of the elemental composition analysis of sawdust and crushed cherry stones are summarized in Table 2.
The conducted research revealed that sawdust contains 48.86% carbon, while crushed cherry stones contain a slightly higher amount—52.51%. Cherry stones, on the other hand, have a slightly lower hydrogen content (6.48%) compared to sawdust—6.65%. In terms of nitrogen content, sawdust contains 0.135% nitrogen, while crushed cherry stones contain a slightly higher amount—1.31%.
According to Piskowska-Wasiak [39], nitrogen in biomass is primarily associated with proteins, DNA, RNA, chlorophyll, alkaloids, and porphyrins. Its presence in thermally processed biomass is undesirable due to the potential formation of nitrogen oxides (NOx).
Most standards for wood pellets [40,41] require pellets to contain less than 0.3% nitrogen. The EN Plus A2 certificate (PN-EN ISO 17225-2:2021-10 standard [42]) allows for a maximum of 0.5%, whereas the EN Plus B certificate permits up to 1.0%. Therefore, pellets produced with up to 20% cherry stones comply with the EN Plus B requirements. Sulfur content was also higher in cherry stones (0.105%) than in sawdust (0.024%). According to the ÖNORM M7135 standards [40], the sulfur content in wood pellets should not exceed 0.04%. As noted by Obernberger [43], a sulfur content exceeding 0.2% may significantly increase SOx emissions. Nevertheless, sulfur in biomass can have a positive effect by mitigating the risk of chloride-induced corrosion, as chloride ions in alkali chlorides (NaCl and KCl) may be converted into more stable sulfates [44]. Hardy et al. [45] report that the risk of chloride corrosion is negligible if chlorine content in biomass does not exceed 0.02%.

3.4. Bulk Density of the Tested Raw Materials

Table 3 presents the bulk density results of sawdust and cherry stones.
Sawdust exhibited a relatively low bulk density of approximately 100 kg·m−3, whereas cherry stones showed a significantly higher value of about 561 kg·m−3. For comparison, Stasiak et al. [46] reported a bulk density of 143 kg·m−3 for sawdust at 10% moisture content, while Netinger Grubeša et al. [47] recorded 472.88 kg·m−3 for cherry stones at 9.30% moisture content.

3.5. Pelleting Process of Sawdust and Ground Cherry Stones

Table 4 summarizes the results of the study investigating the influence of crushed cherry stones content in mixtures with sawdust on the pelleting process. Specifically, it presents the pelletizer’s power demand during pellet production, as well as the effects on the kinetic strength, density, and bulk density of the resulting pellets.
Figure 5 presents the effect of crushed cherry stone content in sawdust mixtures on the pelleting process, expressed as the pelletizer’s power demand during densification.
Based on the results presented in Table 4 and Figure 5, the content of crushed cherry stones in the sawdust mixture was found to have a significant influence on the pelleting process, particularly on the pelletizer’s power demand.
An increase in the proportion of crushed cherry stones from 10% to 20% (at a mixture moisture content of approximately 16%) reduced the pelletizer’s power demand by about 14% (from 3.35 kW to 2.86 kW). Compared with the pelletization of pure sawdust, this reduction reached approximately 24% (from 3.79 kW to 2.86 kW).
The tests confirmed that the addition of crushed cherry stones significantly enhanced the compressibility of the mixture, as evidenced by the marked decrease in pelletizer power demand with increasing cherry stone content.
The recorded values during the compaction of the sawdust–cherry stone mixtures in a pelletizer with a flat die further confirm the beneficial effect of cherry stone addition on reducing energy consumption. Under the same moisture conditions (≈16%), the pelletizer’s power demand for mixtures was substantially lower than for sawdust alone, which required 3.79 kW.
The relationship between the cherry stone content in the sawdust mixture and the pelletizer’s power demand Ng is described by Equation (2):
Ng = −0.31·zp + 4.03
where
zp—content of crushed cherry stones [%],
Ng—pelletizer’s power demand [kW].
According to Obidziński et al. [48], the addition of herbaceous elderberry waste at levels ranging from 10% to 20% did not significantly affect the pelletizer’s power demand, which nonetheless decreased compared to the pelletization of pure pine sawdust. The reduction relative to pure sawdust amounted to approximately 10%.
Similarly, increasing the potato pulp content in mixtures with sawdust from 10% to 25% reduced the pelletizer’s power demand by about 20% (from 7.35 kW to 5.92 kW) [14].
Obidziński et al. [49] further reported that the inclusion of post-flotation dairy sludge in sawdust mixtures had a significant effect on the pelletizer’s power demand. Increasing sludge content from 10% to 20% decreased the power demand by approximately 26.8% (from 3.92 kW to 2.87 kW). Compared with sawdust alone, the reduction in pelletizer’s power demand for the 20% sludge mixture reached 32%.

3.6. Kinetic Strength of Pellets

Figure 6 presents the results of tests on the effect of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust on the kinetic strength of the obtained pellets.
Based on the conducted research (Figure 6), it was found that increasing the content of crushed cherry stones in sawdust mixtures from 10% to 20% resulted in a slight decrease in pellet kinetic strength, by approximately 5% (from 96.60% to 91.37%). The kinetic strength of pellets with a 10% addition of crushed cherry stones was slightly higher than that of pellets produced from pure sawdust under the same moisture conditions (16%), which reached 94.64%.
The addition of crushed cherry stones, combined with water (increasing the mixture moisture from approximately 8% in raw sawdust to about 16% during pelletization) or with steam supplied in the process, promotes the formation of a binder (sticky gel) at elevated temperatures. This binder enhances interparticle bonding, leading to the formation of durable agglomerates with high kinetic strength after drying.
The effect of crushed cherry stone content zp in the sawdust mixture on pellet kinetic strength Pdxg is described by Equation (3):
Pdxg = −1.69·zp2 + 7.47·zp + 88.77
where
zp—content of crushed cherry stones [%],
Pdxg—kinetic strength of pellets [%].
Research conducted by Cwalina et al. [50] showed that the kinetic strength of pellets decreased by 0.7% (from 98.21% to 97.56%). In another study [33], it was reported that pellets produced from hemp shives with a 10% addition of potato pulp exhibited a kinetic strength of 98.1%. A further increase in potato pulp content led to only a slight reduction in strength, with a minimum value of 96.42%.
Dorokhov et al. [51] investigated pellet compositions based on wood sawdust with the addition of coal slime, peat, and a mixture of straw and rice husk. Their findings indicated that the kinetic strength coefficients were 6–32% higher compared to pellets made from pure sawdust.

3.7. Density and Bulk Density of Pellets

Figure 7 presents the effect of crushed cherry stone content in sawdust mixtures on the physical density (Figure 7a) and bulk density (Figure 7b) of the produced pellets. As shown in Figure 7a, increasing the proportion of crushed cherry stones from 10% to 20% slightly reduced pellet density, from 1255.43 kg·m−3 to 1241.65 kg·m−3. At each level of cherry stone addition, the pellets exhibited lower density compared to those made from pure sawdust at the same moisture content (16%), which reached 1312.02 kg·m−3.
The measured pellet densities (all exceeding 1000 kg·m−3) for mixtures containing 10–20% crushed cherry stones confirm that the pellets are of very high quality and can be considered a fully valuable and innovative biofuel. These values meet the requirements of the current PN-EN ISO 17225-2:2021-10 standard [42]. Consequently, the produced pellets can be used as a full-value fuel both in professional power plants equipped with high-efficiency boilers (with strict fuel quality requirements) and in individual biomass heating systems.
The relationship between the bulk density of pellets and the proportion of crushed cherry stones in the sawdust mixture is clearly evident (Figure 7b). An increase in the share of crushed cherry stones from 10% to 20% results in a rise in bulk density, from 604.59 kg·m−3 to 634.36 kg·m−3. This increase is accompanied by a reduction in pellet length as the proportion of crushed cherry stones grows (Figure 8). The observed effect is attributed to the higher oil content of cherry stones, which promotes the formation of shorter pellets.
The effect of crushed cherry stones zp in the mixture with sawdust on the pellets density ρg and on the pellets bulk density ρug is described by Equations (4) and (5):
ρg = −12.17·zp2 − 82.56·zp + 1379.80
ρug = 24.79·zp2 − 136.19·zp + 784.82
where
zp—content of crushed cherry stones [%],
ρg—pellets density [kg·m−3],
ρug—bulk density of pellets [kg·m−3].
The conducted research indicates that the optimal addition of crushed cherry stones, in terms of pellet quality, ranges from 10% to 15%. Within this interval, the produced pellets exhibit favourable properties, including high kinetic strength and increased bulk density. Moreover, this level of additive reduces the energy demand of the pelleting process compared with the energy required for compacting sawdust alone. Paczkowski et al. [52] reported that increasing the proportion of black locust sawdust in the mixture to 75% decreased bulk density from 716 kg·m−3 to 662 kg·m−3. Similarly, the incorporation of potato pulp reduced pellet density from 1290 kg·m−3 to 1230–1260 kg·m−3, demonstrating the influence of organic additives on density. The inclusion of 10% bakery waste in the form of wholegrain bread and pumpkin bread also lowered the bulk density of pellets by approximately 11–16% [53].

3.8. Calorific Value and Heat of Combustion

Table 5 presents results of tests on the calorific value and heat of combustion of sawdust and crushed cherry stones.
Based on tests conducted for dry sawdust (0% moisture) and for sawdust at 8.35% moisture, the effect of sawdust moisture content on the heat combustion of sawdust Qas obtained during combustion in a calorimetric bomb was determined using the following Equation (6):
Qas = −0.242·wp + 24.418
The effect of sawdust moisture content wt on the calorific value Qai using the following Equation (7):
Qas = −0.222·wp + 22.326
Based on the dependence of the heat of combustion and the calorific value of sawdust and crushed cherry stones on moisture content, the heat of combustion and calorific value of the tested raw material mixtures (at 15% moisture content) were determined for different proportions of cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust.
Table 6 presents the results of the study on the effect of crushed cherry stone content in the mixture with the raw material on its calorific value and heat of combustion at analytical moisture (15%).
The obtained values of the heat of combustion and calorific value indicate that the addition of crushed cherry stones enhances the energy performance of the produced pellets. For instance, incorporating 10% crushed cherry stones into sawdust increased the heat of combustion and calorific value by 0.081 MJ·kg−1 (approximately 0.42%), while a 20% addition resulted in an increase of 0.167 MJ·kg−1 (approximately 0.84%).
According to Chojnacki et al. [16], who investigated the effects of adding fruit pomace and vegetable residues to barley straw, the incorporation of pomace slightly reduced the calorific value of pellets compared with pellets produced from straw alone. A 30% pomace addition decreased the calorific value by less than 7% relative to pure barley straw pellets. Similarly, Jekayinfa et al. [54], who pelletised rice bran using a screw-type pelleting machine with starch as a binder, reported heating values in the range of 16.54–17.30 MJ·kg−1. Ferreira et al. [55] characterised pellets produced from residual biomass derived from the processing of Dinizia excelsa and Manilkara elata wood, in combination with Eucalyptus spp. They obtained a heating value of 20.39 MJ·kg−1 for pellets produced from a 50:50 mixture of Dinizia excelsa and Manilkara elata.

3.9. Combustion Tests of Produced Pellets

Table 7 presents the combustion results (exhaust gas composition) obtained during the combustion of sawdust pellets and pellets made from a mixture of sawdust and crushed cherry stones.
Analysing the combustion performance of the produced pellets, it was observed that increasing the proportion of cherry stones from 10% to 20% raised the exhaust gas temperature in the boiler flue from 160 °C (reference sawdust pellets) to 170 °C (10% cherry stone addition) and further to 190 °C (20% addition). Under identical boiler operating parameters, this increase in flue gas temperature reflects the higher calorific value of the fuel, confirming that cherry stones act as an additive enhancing the heat of combustion of the pellets. Elevated combustion temperatures contributed to a reduction in carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide emissions, which for pellets with cherry stone additions remained within the limits set by the EU Ecodesign Directive [56], i.e., below 500 mg·Nm−3 for CO and 200 mg·Nm−3 for NOx. Under the tested biomass combustion conditions, the main source of nitrogen oxides was fuel-bound nitrogen, as the combustion temperature did not exceed 1300 °C. Consequently, the Zeldovich mechanism was not expected to occur, and due to the high excess air coefficient (λ), so-called “Prompt NO” formation, i.e., the reaction of atmospheric N2 with hydrocarbons in fuel-rich zones, was also negligible.
In all cases, the excess air coefficient remained at a level acceptable for the tested unit. Notably, the slight reduction in λ observed with increasing cherry stone content indicated improved contact between combustible particles and the oxidising agent (air).
During combustion, most of the chlorine present in biomass is released as hydrogen chloride (HCl), which may subsequently react with other exhaust gas components to form dioxins. As the flue gases cooled outside the combustion chamber, a considerable share of chlorine condensed as salts on heat exchanger surfaces or on fly ash particles, leading to high-temperature chloride corrosion of boiler components. Although the Ecodesign Directive does not specify maximum HCl concentrations in flue gases from small-scale boilers, German standards set a permissible limit of <5 mg·m−3. In the present study, HCl concentrations in the flue gases were comparably low, reflecting the low chlorine content of the raw materials used for pellet production.
Sulphur oxide emissions depended primarily on the sulphur content of the fuel. During combustion, biomass sulphur was oxidised mainly to sulphur dioxide (SO2), with minor amounts of sulphur trioxide (SO3), subsequently forming alkalis and sulphates. The significance of sulphur lies less in its emission levels and more in its role in corrosion processes. High SOx concentrations in exhaust gases contribute to the sulphurisation of alkalis and alkali metal chlorides, reducing the flue gas dew point and promoting chlorine release. Certified wood pellets burned in the same installation generated sulphur dioxide emissions of approximately 23 mg·m−3, a level similar to that observed for the tested pellets.
For comparison, combustion tests carried out using uncrushed cherry stones in the same boiler installation showed significantly poorer emission characteristics and less favourable combustion behaviour compared with pellets. The values reported in Table 8 are expressed relative to 10% oxygen content in the exhaust gases.
In summary, the incorporation of cherry stones into wood sawdust improved pellet combustion performance by reducing emissions of harmful CO, NO, and SO2 compounds, primarily as a result of the higher combustion temperature. The observed reduction in the excess air coefficient (λ) indicated enhanced fuel–air mixing conditions within the combustion chamber, thereby decreasing heat losses through the exhaust gases. Importantly, the CO and NO emissions from the combustion of wood–sawdust pellets enriched with cherry stones in a Class 5 boiler with a retort grate complied with the requirements of the Ecodesign Directive of the European Parliament and Council [56], which has been in force since 1 January 2020.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

The proportion of cherry stones in the sawdust mixture exhibited the highest sum of absolute correlation values and was strongly associated with the physical and energy parameters of the pellets (Table S1). This factor had a significant effect (r > 0.8 or r < −0.8) on seven of the 13 variables analysed, with the strongest correlations observed for the heat of combustion and the calorific value of the pellets. In contrast, kinetic strength had the weakest influence on pellet quality parameters, with correlation coefficients ranging from −0.8646 (CO2 emissions) to 0.8269 (O2 emissions). Apart from these two parameters, kinetic strength showed no strong correlations with the other variables and yielded a relatively low sum of correlation values (Σ|r| = 6.0079) (Table S1).
Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed these results, indicating that the proportion of crushed cherry stones, heat of combustion, and calorific value were characterised by the highest negative loadings, ranging from −0.9921 (heat of combustion) to −0.9951 (cherry stone content), with respect to the first principal component (Figure 9). By contrast, kinetic strength was positively loaded (0.9303) on the second component.

4. Conclusions

Based on the conducted research, it was found that the sawdust was characterised by excessively low moisture content and an excessive fine fraction, which adversely affected the pelleting process and the quality of the pellets. The addition of crushed cherry stones to the mixture proved to be an effective method of improving the raw material properties. It enhanced compactibility, reduced the energy consumption of the process by more than 20%, and enabled the efficient management of the problematic fine fraction. At the same time, the incorporation of cherry stones reduced wear on the pelletizer operating system and improved overall process efficiency.
The analysis of pellet physical properties demonstrated that the addition of cherry stones caused only minor changes in strength and density while maintaining values compliant with market requirements and the PN-EN ISO 17225-2:2021-10 standard. From an energy perspective, the produced pellets exhibited higher heat of combustion and calorific values, which, combined with lower emissions of CO, NO, and SO2, translated into improved combustion quality and reduced heat losses. The cherry stone pellets also complied with EN Plus B, DIN-Plus, and ÖNORM M7135 requirements for nitrogen and sulphur content, and their gaseous emissions met the limits of the Ecodesign Directive.
The resulting product, with a density exceeding 1000 kg·m−3, represents a high-quality solid fuel with favourable performance parameters. Its production process can be regarded as both innovative and energy-efficient. An additional advantage lies in the utilisation of large quantities of cherry stone waste from the fruit processing industry, in line with EU waste management policies promoting prevention, recycling, and reuse. Consequently, the use of cherry stones in pellet production may be considered both technologically advantageous and environmentally sustainable within the renewable energy sector.
The proportion of cherry stones in the sawdust mixture exerted a decisive influence on pellet physical and energy parameters, particularly heat of combustion and the calorific value. By contrast, kinetic strength played only a marginal role, showing significant correlations mainly with gas emissions. Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed the key importance of cherry stone content and energy parameters, whereas kinetic strength was associated primarily with the second component, underscoring its lesser relevance in assessing pellet quality.
Using cherry stones and sawdust for pellet production not only provides an alternative source of renewable energy but also helps reduce the burden of waste management in the agri-food sector. The valorization of these residues through pellet production enhances environmental sustainability and makes a significant contribution to the development of circular bioeconomy strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en18205356/s1, Table S1: Matrix of Pearson correlation coefficients between the physical (mechanical) parameters of the obtained pellets and the energy parameters and exhaust emissions from the combustion of pellets containing crushed cherry stones.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C. and S.O.; data curation, P.C., A.S., M.K.-S., P.B. and J.M.; formal analysis, A.S., M.K.-S. and J.M.; investigation, P.C., A.S. and M.K.-S.; methodology, P.C., S.O., A.S. and P.B.; resources, P.B. and M.K.-S.; supervision, P.C. and S.O.; validation, S.O., A.S., M.K.-S., P.B. and J.M.; visualization, P.C., A.S., M.K.-S. and P.B.; writing—original draft, S.O., P.C. and M.K.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.S., M.K.-S. and P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out as part of a team project no. WZ/WB-IIS/5/2023 and was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as part of a grant for maintaining research potential awarded to the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Paweł Braun was Co-owner of company DAK-POL Sp. z o.o. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2023/2413 of 18 October 2023, Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Directive (EU) 2018/1999, Directive 98/70/EC on the Promotion of Energy from Control Sources and Repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652. Official Journal of the European Union. 2023. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302413 (accessed on 10 July 2025).
  2. Act on Renewable Energy Sources (‘RES Act’, Dz.U. 2015 poz. 478) Poland (2015). Available online: https://www.prawo.egospodarka.pl/akty/dziennik-ustaw/2015/000/478 (accessed on 10 July 2025).
  3. Bioenergy Europe: Internal EU Pellet Production Leapt in 2023. Available online: https://www.bioenergy-news.com/news/bioenergy-europe-internal-eu-pellet-production-leapt-in-2023/ (accessed on 21 August 2025).
  4. Żary-Sikorska, E. Odpady z przetwórstwa owoców i warzyw–charakterystyka problemu. Infrastrukt. I Ekol. Teren. Wiej. 2024, 19, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matuszak-Flejszman, A.; Joachimiak-Lechman, K. Current Trends in Quality Science, Product Management—Quality, Safety and Environmental Focus; Poznań University of Economics and Business: Poznań, Poland, 2019; ISBN 978-83-7789-588-7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakravarty, I.; Mandavgane, S.A. Valorization of Fruit and Vegetable Waste for Biofertilizer and Biogas. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zawadzińska, A.; Salachna, P.; Nowak, J.S.; Kowalczyk, W.; Piechocki, R.; Łopusiewicz, Ł.; Pietrak, A. Compost Based on Pulp and Paper Mill Sludge, Fruit-Vegetable Waste, Mushroom Spent Substrate and Rye Straw Improves Yield and Nutritional Value of Tomato. Agronomy 2022, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karimi Sani, I.; Masoudpour-Behabadi, M.; Alizadeh Sani, M.; Motalebinejad, H.; Juma, A.S.M.; Asdagh, A.; Eghbaljoo, H.; Khodaei, S.M.; Rhim, J.-W.; Mohammadi, F. Value-Added Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Processing by-Products for the Manufacture of Biodegradable Food Packaging Films. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nirmal, N.P.; Khanashyam, A.C.; Mundanat, A.S.; Shah, K.; Babu, K.S.; Thorakkattu, P.; Al-Asmari, F.; Pandiselvam, R. Valorization of Fruit Waste for Bioactive Compounds and Their Applications in the Food Industry. Foods 2023, 12, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arulprakasajothi, M.; Beemkumar, N.; Parthipan, J.; Battu, N.R. Investigating the Physio-Chemical Properties of Densified Biomass Pellet Fuels from Fruit and Vegetable Market Waste. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rostocki, A.; Unyay, H.; Ławińska, K.; Obraniak, A. Granulates Based on Bio and Industrial Waste and Biochar in a Sustainable Economy. Energies 2023, 16, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marreiro, H.M.P.; Peruchi, R.S.; Lopes, R.M.B.P.; Andersen, S.L.F.; Eliziário, S.A.; Rotella Junior, P. Empirical Studies on Biomass Briquette Production: A Literature Review. Energies 2021, 14, 8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kpalo, S.Y.; Zainuddin, M.F.; Manaf, L.A.; Roslan, A.M. A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Obidziński, S.; Cwalina, P.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Krasowska, M.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Zając, G.; Słowik, T.; Mazur, J.; Jankowski, M. Physical and Energy Properties of Fuel Pellets Produced from Sawdust with Potato Pulp Addition. Energies 2024, 17, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gholami Banadkoki, O.; Sokhansanj, S.; Lau, A.; Arunachalam, S.; Smith, D. The Physiochemical Properties of Pellets Made from the Foliage of Vegetable Crops. Energies 2025, 18, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chojnacki, J.; Zdanowicz, A.; Ondruška, J.; Šooš, Ľ.; Smuga-Kogut, M. The Influence of Apple, Carrot and Red Beet Pomace Content on the Properties of Pellet from Barley Straw. Energies 2021, 14, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hejft, R.; Obidziński, S.; Jałbrzykowski, M.; Markowski, J. Production of Heating Pellets with Apple Pomace Content. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2016, 61, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kraiem, N.; Lajili, M.; Limousy, L.; Said, R.; Jeguirim, M. Energy Recovery from Tunisian Agri-Food Wastes: Evaluation of Combustion Performance and Emissions Characteristics of Green Pellets Prepared from Tomato Residues and Grape Marc. Energy 2016, 107, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, S.B.; Oh, H.Y.; Kim, J.J.; Choi, K.S. Characteristics of Spent Coffee Ground as a Fuel and Combustion Test in a Small Boiler (6.5 kW). Renew. Energy 2017, 113, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Allesina, G.; Pedrazzi, S.; Allegretti, F.; Tartarini, P. Spent Coffee Grounds as Heat Source for Coffee Roasting Plants: Experimental Validation and Case Study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 126, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nowicka, P.; Wojdylo, A.; Oszmianski, J. Jakość produktów wiśniowych dostępnych w handlu. Przemysł Ferment. I Owocowo-Warzywny 2013, 57, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yılmaz, C.; Gökmen, V. Compositional Characteristics of Sour Cherry Kernel and Its Oil as Influenced by Different Extraction and Roasting Conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 49, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Burgstaller, C.; Renner, K. Feasibility of Cherry Pit Particles as a Natural Reinforcement in Polypropylene. Macromol 2023, 3, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Frišták, V.; Bošanská, D.; Pipíška, M.; Ďuriška, L.; Bell, S.M.; Soja, G. Physicochemical Characterization of Cherry Pits-Derived Biochar. Materials 2022, 15, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pollard, Z.A.; Goldfarb, J.L. Valorization of Cherry Pits: Great Lakes Agro-Industrial Waste to Mediate Great Lakes Water Quality. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 270, 116073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bagheri, S.; Alinejad, M.; Nejad, M.; Aliakbarian, B. Creating Incremental Revenue from Industrial Cherry Wastes. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 87, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kniepkamp, K.; Errico, M.; Yu, M.; Roda-Serrat, M.C.; Eilers, J.-G.; Wark, M.; van Haren, R. Lipid Extraction of High-Moisture Sour Cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) Stones by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2024, 99, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. PN-EN ISO18134-3:2023-12; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Moisture Content—Part 3: Moisture in the Sample for General Analysis. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2023.
  29. PN-R-64798:2009; Feed—Determination of Fineness. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  30. PN-EN ISO 16948:2015-07; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Total Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen Content. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  31. PN-EN ISO 16994:2016-10; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Total Sulfur and Chlorine Content. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  32. PN-EN ISO 17830:2016-07; Solid Biofuels—Grain Composition of Crushed Pellets. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2016.
  33. Obidziński, S.; Cwalina, P.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Krasowska, M.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Faszczewski, D.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J. The Use of Bread Bakery Waste as a Binder Additive in the Production of Fuel Pellets from Straw. Energies 2023, 16, 7313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. PN-EN ISO 17831-1:2016-02; Solid Biofuels—Determination of Mechanical Strength of Pellets and Briquettes—Part 1: Pellets. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  35. PN-EN ISO 1928:2002; Solid Mineral Fuels—Determination of Gross Calorific Value by the Bomb Calorimetric Method, and Calculation of Net Calorific Value. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  36. Serrano, C.; Monedero, E.; Lapuerta, M.; Portero, H. Effect of Moisture Content, Particle Size and Pine Addition on Quality Parameters of Barley Straw Pellets. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, X.; Cheng, W.; Liu, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, H. Effect of Moisture Content during Preparation on the Physicochemical Properties of Pellets Made from Different Biomass Materials. BioRes 2019, 15, 557–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matkowski, P.; Lisowski, A.; Świętochowski, A. Pelletising Pure Wheat Straw and Blends of Straw with Calcium Carbonate or Cassava Starch at Different Moisture, Temperature, and Die Height Values: Modelling and Optimisation. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 272, 122955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Piskowska-Wasiak, J. Purification and processing of gas from biomass gasification to produce SNG (Substitute Natural Gas). Naft.-Gaz 2011, 67, 347–360. Available online: https://inig.pl/magazyn/nafta-gaz/NAFTA-GAZ-2011-05-07.pdf (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  40. Austrian Standards Institute. ÖNORM M 7135: Compressed Wood and Compressed Bark in Natural State—Pellets and Briquettes—Requirements and Test Specifications; Austrian Standards Institute: Vienna, Austria, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. PN-EN ISO 17225-1:2021-11; Solid Biofuels—Fuel Specifications and Grades—Part 1: General Requirements. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  42. PN-EN ISO 17225-2:2021; Solid Biofuels—Fuel Specifications and Classes Part 2: Graded Wood Pellets. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  43. Obernberger, I. Physical Characteristics and Chemical Composition of Solid Biomass Fuels. In Thermochemical Biomass Conversion; Eindhofen University of Technology: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  44. Król, D.; Borsukiewicz-Gozdur, A. Energy from Sawmill and Agricultural Waste Biomass. Arch. Gospod. Odpad. I Ochr. Sr. 2014, 16, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hardy, T.; Kordylewski, W.; Mościcki, K. Chlorine corrosion hazard due to firing and co-firing of biomass in boilers. Arch. Spalania 2009, 9, 181–195. Available online: https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BATD-0003-0006 (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  46. Stasiak, M.; Molenda, M.; Bańda, M.; Wiącek, J.; Parafiniuk, P.; Lisowski, A.; Gancarz, M.; Gondek, E. Mechanical Characteristics of Pine Biomass of Different Sizes and Shapes. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Netinger Grubeša, I.; Šamec, D.; Juradin, S.; Hadzima-Nyarko, M. Utilizing Agro-Waste as Aggregate in Cement Composites: A Comprehensive Review of Properties, Global Trends, and Applications. Materials 2025, 18, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Obidziński, S.; Cwalina, P.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Krasowska, M.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Zając, G.; Kryński, R. Effect of the Addition of Elderberry Waste to Sawdust on the Process of Pelletization and the Quality of Fuel Pellets. Energies 2024, 17, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Obidziński, S.; Joka Yildiz, M.; Dąbrowski, S.; Jasiński, J.; Czekała, W. Application of Post-Flotation Dairy Sludge in the Production of Wood Pellets: Pelletization and Combustion Analysis. Energies 2022, 15, 9427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cwalina, P.; Obidziński, S.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Piekut, J.; Bagińska, E.; Mazur, J. Production and Quality Assessment of Fertilizer Pellets from Compost with Sewage Sludge Ash (SSA) Addition. Materials 2025, 18, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dorokhov, V.V.; Nyashina, G.S.; Romanov, D.S.; Strizhak, P.A. Combustion and Mechanical Properties of Pellets from Biomass and Industrial Waste. Renew. Energy 2024, 228, 120625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Paczkowski, S.; Sauer, C.; Anetzberger, A.; Jaeger, D.; Pelz, S. Utilization of Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) Sawdust as an Alternative Pelletization Raw Material. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2024, 14, 25583–25597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Obidziński, S.; Szyszlak-Bargłowicz, J.; Zając, G.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Krasowska, M.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Cwalina, P.; Faszczewski, D.; Wasilewski, J. The Effect of Bakery Waste Addition on Pine Sawdust Pelletization and Pellet Quality. Energies 2024, 17, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jekayinfa, S.O.; Abdulsalam, I.A.; Ola, F.A.; Akande, F.B.; Orisaleye, J.I. Effects of Binders and Die Geometry on Quality of Densified Rice Bran Using a Screw-Type Laboratory Scale Pelleting Machine. Energy Nexus 2024, 13, 100275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ferreira, G.; Brito, T.M.; da Silva, J.G.M.; Minini, D.; Dias Júnior, A.F.; Arantes, M.D.C.; Batista, D.C. Wood Waste Pellets as an Alternative for Energy Generation in the Amazon Region. Bioenerg. Res. 2023, 16, 472–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1189 of 28 April 2015 Implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with Regard to Ecodesign Requirements for Solid Fuel Boilers (Text with EEA Relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. 2015. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/1189/oj/eng (accessed on 18 July 2025).
Figure 1. Raw material: (a) sawdust sample, (b) bag of sawdust, (c) uncrushed cherry stones and (d) crushed cheery stones.
Figure 1. Raw material: (a) sawdust sample, (b) bag of sawdust, (c) uncrushed cherry stones and (d) crushed cheery stones.
Energies 18 05356 g001aEnergies 18 05356 g001b
Figure 2. Granulometric distribution of sawdust and cherry stones particles subjected to sieve analysis.
Figure 2. Granulometric distribution of sawdust and cherry stones particles subjected to sieve analysis.
Energies 18 05356 g002
Figure 3. Individual sawdust fractions subjected to sieve analysis (a) >8 mm, (b) 4 mm, (c) 2 mm, (d) 1 mm, (e) 0.500 mm, (f) 0.250 mm, (g) 0.125 mm, (h) 0.063 mm.
Figure 3. Individual sawdust fractions subjected to sieve analysis (a) >8 mm, (b) 4 mm, (c) 2 mm, (d) 1 mm, (e) 0.500 mm, (f) 0.250 mm, (g) 0.125 mm, (h) 0.063 mm.
Energies 18 05356 g003
Figure 4. Individual fractions of crushed cherry stones subjected to sieve analysis (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, (c) 0.500 mm, (d) 0.250 mm, (e) 0.125 mm, (f) 0.063 mm.
Figure 4. Individual fractions of crushed cherry stones subjected to sieve analysis (a) 2 mm, (b) 1 mm, (c) 0.500 mm, (d) 0.250 mm, (e) 0.125 mm, (f) 0.063 mm.
Energies 18 05356 g004
Figure 5. Dependence of the pelletizer’s power demand on the content of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust.
Figure 5. Dependence of the pelletizer’s power demand on the content of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust.
Energies 18 05356 g005
Figure 6. Dependence of the kinetic strength of the pellets on the content of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust.
Figure 6. Dependence of the kinetic strength of the pellets on the content of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust.
Energies 18 05356 g006
Figure 7. The effect of crushed cherry stone content in the mixture with sawdust on (a) physical density, (b) bulk density of pellets.
Figure 7. The effect of crushed cherry stone content in the mixture with sawdust on (a) physical density, (b) bulk density of pellets.
Energies 18 05356 g007aEnergies 18 05356 g007b
Figure 8. View of pellets obtained from a mixture of sawdust and crushed cherry stones: (a) 0%, (b) 10%, (c) 15%, (d) 20%.
Figure 8. View of pellets obtained from a mixture of sawdust and crushed cherry stones: (a) 0%, (b) 10%, (c) 15%, (d) 20%.
Energies 18 05356 g008
Figure 9. Two-dimensional graph of physical (mechanical), energy and exhaust emission parameters from the combustion of pellets containing crushed cherry stones, showing the two principal components (PC1 and PC2) of the PCA model, which together explain 99.0% of the total variance, i.e., 67.40% and 31.58% for PC1 and PC2, respectively. Blue two-dimensional vectors indicate the strength and direction of factor loading for all analyzed parameters.
Figure 9. Two-dimensional graph of physical (mechanical), energy and exhaust emission parameters from the combustion of pellets containing crushed cherry stones, showing the two principal components (PC1 and PC2) of the PCA model, which together explain 99.0% of the total variance, i.e., 67.40% and 31.58% for PC1 and PC2, respectively. Blue two-dimensional vectors indicate the strength and direction of factor loading for all analyzed parameters.
Energies 18 05356 g009
Table 1. Results of moisture determination for raw materials designated for pelleting process.
Table 1. Results of moisture determination for raw materials designated for pelleting process.
Raw MaterialMoisture ± SD [%]
Cherry stones4.32 ± 0.09
Pine sawdust8.35 ± 0.10
Table 2. Elementary composition of raw materials.
Table 2. Elementary composition of raw materials.
Raw MaterialC ± SD [%]H ± SD [%]N ± SD [%]S ± SD [%]O* [%]Cl [%]Ash [%]
Cherry stones52.51 ± 0.056.48 ± 0.021.31 ± 0.0010.105 ± 0.00138.200.0011.40 ± 0.001
Pine sawdust48.86 ± 0.056.65 ± 0.010.135 ± 0.0010.024 ± 0.00144.240.0040.89 ± 0.02
O*—calculated by difference.
Table 3. Results of bulk density tests of sawdust and cherry stones.
Table 3. Results of bulk density tests of sawdust and cherry stones.
Raw MaterialBulk Density ± SD [kg·m−3]
Pine sawdust100.08 ± 4.48
Cherry stones561.02 ± 3.01
Table 4. Effect of crushed cherry stone content in sawdust mixtures on the pelleting process (pelletizer’s power demand and energy consumption), as well as on the kinetic strength, density, and bulk density of the produced pellets.
Table 4. Effect of crushed cherry stone content in sawdust mixtures on the pelleting process (pelletizer’s power demand and energy consumption), as well as on the kinetic strength, density, and bulk density of the produced pellets.
Pellet Quality
Cherry Stones Content [%]Pelletizer’s Power Demand [kW]Energy Consumption [kW·h·t−1]Kinetic Strength [%]Density [kg·m−3]Bulk Density [kg·m−3]
03.7975.894.641312.02675.75
103.3567.096.601255.43604.59
153.0561.096.201249.55606.36
202.8657.291.371241.65634.36
Table 5. Test results of the calorific value and heat of combustion of sawdust and cherry stones.
Table 5. Test results of the calorific value and heat of combustion of sawdust and cherry stones.
Raw Material Heat of Combustion [MJ·kg−1]Calorific Value [MJ·kg−1]
Analytical Moisture ± SD [%]Dry Matter ± SDAnalytical
Moisture
± SD
Dry Matter ± SDAnalytical Moisture ± SD
Cherry stones8.35 ± 0.0923.499 ± 0.04521.528 ± 0.05022.022 ± 0.04619.974 ± 0.046
Pine sawdust15.00 ± 0.0824.418 ± 0.02220.792 ± 0.02622.326 ± 0.08719.004 ± 0.038
Table 6. The effect of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust on the calorific value and combustion heat.
Table 6. The effect of crushed cherry stones in the mixture with sawdust on the calorific value and combustion heat.
Cherry Stones Content [%]Heat of Combustion [MJ·kg−1]Calorific Value [MJ·kg−1]
019.95918.323
520.00118.357
1020.04218.391
1520.08418.425
2020.12618.459
2520.16718.493
Table 7. Exhaust gas composition from the combustion of pellets made from used sawdust and a mixture of sawdust and crushed cherry stones.
Table 7. Exhaust gas composition from the combustion of pellets made from used sawdust and a mixture of sawdust and crushed cherry stones.
ParametersPellets Without Cherry SeedsPellets with 10% Cherry SeedsPellets with 15% Cherry SeedsPellets with 20% Cherry SeedsEcodesign Limit Value (at 10% O2)
Actual ConcentrationAt 10% O2Actual ConcentrationAt 10% O2Actual ConcentrationAt 10% O2Actual ConcentrationAt 10% O2
CO2 [%]6.077.866.307.776.257.547.417.51-
CO [mg·Nm−3]439.38569.27382.51471.83368.66445.14417.54423.31500
NOx [mg·Nm−3]208.24269.81153.29189.04139.95168.99149.81151.88200
SO2 [mg·Nm−3]24.8832.2317.8822.0517.4221.0322.5322.84-
HCl [mg·Nm−3]1.982.562.222.742.192.642.762.79-
O2 [%]12.51-12.08-11.89-10.15--
Excess air coefficient λ2.392.282.231.89
Flue gas temperature in the boiler flue [°C]160170175190
Table 8. Composition of exhaust gases from the combustion of whole cherry stones.
Table 8. Composition of exhaust gases from the combustion of whole cherry stones.
ParametersValueEcodesign Standard [56]
CO2 [%]7.78-
CO [mg·Nm−3]731.86500
SO2 [mg·Nm−3]58.49-
NO [mg·Nm−3]381.83200
HCl [mg·Nm−3]9.04-
Actual oxygen content in exhaust gases [%]14.34-
Excess air coefficient λ [-]3.00-
Flue gas temperature in the boiler flue [°C]160-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Obidziński, S.; Cwalina, P.; Kowczyk-Sadowy, M.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Mazur, J.; Braun, P. The Effect of Cherry Stone Addition to Sawdust on the Pelletization Process and Fuel Pellet Quality. Energies 2025, 18, 5356. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205356

AMA Style

Obidziński S, Cwalina P, Kowczyk-Sadowy M, Sienkiewicz A, Mazur J, Braun P. The Effect of Cherry Stone Addition to Sawdust on the Pelletization Process and Fuel Pellet Quality. Energies. 2025; 18(20):5356. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Obidziński, Sławomir, Paweł Cwalina, Małgorzata Kowczyk-Sadowy, Aneta Sienkiewicz, Jacek Mazur, and Paweł Braun. 2025. "The Effect of Cherry Stone Addition to Sawdust on the Pelletization Process and Fuel Pellet Quality" Energies 18, no. 20: 5356. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205356

APA Style

Obidziński, S., Cwalina, P., Kowczyk-Sadowy, M., Sienkiewicz, A., Mazur, J., & Braun, P. (2025). The Effect of Cherry Stone Addition to Sawdust on the Pelletization Process and Fuel Pellet Quality. Energies, 18(20), 5356. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop