Next Article in Journal
LLMs in Wind Turbine Gearbox Failure Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study of Self-Heating Maintenance Performance of an Integrated Regenerative Catalytic Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Fuel Economy Optimization of Series–Parallel Hybrid Powertrain for Van-Style VW Crafter Vehicle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Smart Charging for E-Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review

Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (Africa), University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(17), 4655; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174655
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 31 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025

Abstract

The significant rise of electric vehicles in urban areas calls for research on smart charging to promote electric mobility. Existing research is fragmented, with inconsistent findings, focusing on single aspects of smart charging, such as challenges, charging technologies, and sustainability concerns. Thus, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to identify the key themes and propose future research agendas on smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas, to guide policy formulation and promote widespread uptake of electric vehicles. A total of 201 publications covering the period 2005 to 2025 were extracted from the Scopus database; the first was published in 2011 and numbers peaked in 2024, with 39 publications. The topic is young, with an average age per publication of 4.17 years, with China as the top-ranked country, with 97 publications. Research on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas focuses on four key themes: smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies, grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems, renewable energy and environmental sustainability, and urban mobility systems and infrastructure development. Despite their importance, real-world testing and smarter integration with cities and grids remain largely underexplored, especially in developing countries. Future research should focus on large-scale vehicle-to-grid integration, user behaviour analysis, and coordinated planning of smart charging with urban transport and policy frameworks.

1. Introduction

During the last few years, there have been efforts to adopt electric vehicles (EVs) in urban areas. For instance, India has an ambitious plan for electrifying urban transport, mainly using two-wheelers, three-wheelers, and electric buses [1]. Chile’s first National Electromobility Strategy targets 100 per cent of urban public transport to be electric by 2050 [2]. In the United States of America, California State targets transport network companies to transition to zero-emission vehicles (such as EVs) by 2030 [3]. The increased electric mobility (e-mobility) in urban areas presents opportunities and challenges. In India, investments in charging infrastructure and electrification of the transport sector are expected to spur economic growth, resulting from increased electricity demand and more job opportunities [1]. In recent years, investments from both local and international companies have driven the growth of electric vehicle production in Latin America, creating thousands of jobs and encouraging the development of new local supply chains [2]. Policies from the European Commission aim to support initiatives related to both sustainable mobility and smart cities, as they lead to road transport decarbonisation or mitigation of urban air pollution [4]. In addition, there is a shift toward EVs in transportation because of their minimal environmental impacts, such as reduced carbon emissions, energy savings, and improved urban air quality [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, the growing number of EVs leads to increased electricity demand that could significantly strain the grid [12,13]. In addition, EVs are characterised by range limitations, insufficient charging infrastructure, and a time-consuming charging process [5,6,14], likely to hinder widespread EV adoption. The slow adoption of EVs is due to factors such as battery technology, availability of charging stations, and loadshedding [10]. Thus, there is a need for efficient and fast charging solutions, such as smart charging, to manage the increasing electricity demands and support the growing uptake of EVs in urban areas. An efficient EV charging management system relies on effective communication among EVs, electric vehicle supply equipment, and the power grid [15].
Smart charging refers to the innovative functions of EV charging stations that revamp the charging framework by deploying and managing power distribution in a more flexible and productive way [16]. Mlindelwa et al. [5] assert that charging time and mode can be changed in smart charging depending on network traffic, renewable energy production, and the requirements of EV owners. It collects and analyses usage data to optimise system performance, conducts real-time surveillance of charger usage and status, and monitors energy consumption while managing network congestion by pre-booking charging ports [16]. Smart charging helps drivers locate idle charging stations, charge more quickly and safely, and reduce charging costs [8]. It also assists charging stations in controlling electricity consumption and remotely monitoring EV charging events [15]. Smart charging can also optimise energy usage behaviours linked to new charging technologies, challenges in identifying charging stations during daytime hours, increasing infrastructure and equipment costs, and potential system overloads during high-demand periods [9]. In addition, smart charging would facilitate scheduled charging, charging at times of lower demand, and load management through mobile applications [2].
Smart charging is particularly relevant in urban areas, as it can postpone energy usage to off-peak periods, thereby minimising the total energy system costs while still meeting the energy demands of EVs [17]. Lengthy queues at conventional charging stations result in recharging delays [9], discouraging EV owners in urban areas. Urban areas are further constrained by limited space, high population, high traffic congestion, high electricity demand during peak hours, and rising pollution [8,13,18,19]. With the number of delivery vehicles expected to rise by 36% in the world’s top 100 cities by 2030 [20], traffic congestion and environmental pollution are expected to increase. In addition, urban areas are more likely to face grid failure and blackouts due to the additional burden on the grid resulting from the high number of EVs in urban areas [18]. According to Doda et al. [19], urban areas are evolving into smart cities where integrating EVs and energy management systems are crucial to address limited space, high energy demands, and environmental concerns. Thus, smart charging has been implemented to alleviate traffic congestion, optimise parking space utilisation, improve parking efficiency, and support sustainable utilisation of energy [9], thereby enabling smart integration of e-mobility in urban areas. Mlindelwa et al. [5] recommend smart (flexible) charging for future smart cities to respond to customer needs.
Despite the existence of numerous studies on smart charging for EVs in urban areas, a preliminary search in the Scopus database using keywords: Article title ((“smart charging” OR “intelligent charging”) AND (“electric transport” OR “e-transport” OR “electric mobility” OR “e-mobility”) AND (“bibliometric” OR “review”)) failed to identify a study directly aligned with the focus of this review. In addition, existing research is fragmented, with inconsistent findings, and focuses on single aspects of smart charging such as benefits and challenges [5,8], vehicle grid integration and charging technologies [21,22], renewable energy and sustainability concerns [9,22], economic and viability analysis [18], and optimised smart charging [23,24]. In addition, integration of electric charging infrastructure in urban areas is an underexplored area in electric mobility [25]. While smart charging components are explored, their practical deployment in urban areas needs greater attention. This reveals a gap in the literature, emphasising the need to conduct a comprehensive review to synthesise existing knowledge and guide future research directions. This is crucial in supporting policy formulation and accelerating the widespread use of EVs in urban areas. This review is guided by the following specific objectives:
  • To identify the key themes used in smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas research.
  • To propose future research agendas on smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas.
The next sections of this review are organised as follows: Section 2 (materials and methods), Section 3 (results), Section 4 (discussion), and Section 5 (conclusions).

2. Materials and Methods

A bibliometric analysis was utilised to identify key themes in smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas research. Bibliometric analysis employs quantitative methods, namely performance analysis and science mapping, to examine large amounts of scientific data to identify emerging areas in a field [26]. Similarly, bibliometric analysis is a good technique used to reveal key themes from publications, offering insights on past, present, and future research [27]. A search was undertaken in the Scopus database on 29 May 2025 using a combination of keywords: Article title, Abstract, Keywords ((“smart charging” OR “intelligent charging”) AND (“electric vehicle” OR “electric car” OR “electric bike” OR “electric scooter” OR “electric rickshaw” OR “electric automobile” OR “electric truck” OR “electric mobility” OR “electric micromobility” OR “electric transport” OR “EV” OR “BEV” OR “HEV” OR “PHEV” OR “FCEV” OR “EREV” OR “e-vehicle” OR “e-car” OR “e-bike” OR “e-scooter” OR “e-rickshaw” OR “e-automobile” OR “e-truck” OR “e-mobility” OR “e-micromobility” OR “e-transport” OR ((“battery” OR “plug-in battery” OR “hybrid” OR “fuel cell” OR “extended range”) AND “electric vehicle”)) AND (“urban” OR “town” OR “city” OR “cities” OR “metropolitan”)). To ensure comprehensive coverage, alternatives to the keywords “smart charging”, “electric mobility”, and “urban areas” were considered. The Scopus database is a trusted source of bibliometric data [28]. In addition, the Scopus database has a broader and more comprehensive coverage of content better suited for research evaluation, compared to other databases such as the Web of Science and Google Scholar [29]. This search was restricted to journal articles, review papers, conference papers, and book chapters published in English between 2005 and 2025, displaying 211 publications.
After a manual inspection of the topics and abstracts, 10 publications were found to be irrelevant and deleted. The deleted publications covered topics like smart buildings, sustainable urban regeneration, and general reviews on urban mobility, which were not directly aligned with the focus of this study, resulting in 201 publications. The 201 publications were exported as a CSV Excel file for bibliometric analysis using the Biblioshiny app via the Bibliometrix package version 4.3.0. Among the 201 publications, 89 (44.3%) are articles, and 2 (1%) are reviews (Table 1). Table 1 presents key information of the data used in this review. It was noted that even though the search was restricted to publications between 2005 and 2025, the first publication was in 2011. In addition, the average age per publication is 4.17 years, suggesting that this is a young field. There is a high average number of citations per publication (17.56) (Table 1), underscoring the impact and relevance of research in the field.

3. Results

This section is divided into two subsections: performance analysis and science mapping.

3.1. Performance Analysis

The early phase (2011 to 2016) recorded minimal research, ranging between one to five publications per year (Figure 1). Smart charging for electric mobility was a new concept during this stage. A noticeable growth was recorded in 2017, with 12 publications. Between 2017 and 2020, moderate growth between 12 and 15 publications was recorded yearly. This could be attributed to growing policy support from most governments, laying the groundwork for smart charging. Substantial growth was recorded in 2021, with 28 publications and a high of 39 publications in 2024. The significant growth can be attributed to an increase in smart charging resulting from technological innovations, policy, and charging infrastructure developments. The noticeable decline to 12 publications in 2025 (Figure 1) is likely due to the incomplete indexing of publications for the current year.

3.1.1. Most Productive Journals

Table 2 shows that Sustainable Cities and Society Review is the most productive journal, with seven publications, an h-index of 6, a g-index of 7, an m-index of 1.2, and 171 total citations computed from 2021. The journal mainly focuses on sustainable and smart urban systems across energy, infrastructure, and society, thus making this journal influential in smart charging research, as it examines EV charging within the broader urban sustainability and smart city contexts. The Applied Energy journal is influential, with the highest total citations (TC = 490) from seven publications. The journal primarily focuses on applied research on innovative technologies and low-carbon and renewable energy systems, which is critical in understanding the integration of EV charging into energy grids and smart charging solutions. The World Electric Vehicle Journal is an emerging journal with an m-index of 0.857, from 12 publications with 105 total citations calculated from 2019. This specialised journal primarily focuses on electric vehicle technologies and charging infrastructure that support e-mobility in smart cities.
The journals are classified into three themes based on their scope: smart cities and urban sustainability, energy systems and grid optimisation, and electric vehicles and charging innovations. The smart cities and urban sustainability theme includes Sustainable Cities and Society Review, Sustainability, and IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. These are influential journals that highlight policy, planning, and infrastructure dimensions necessary for integrating smart charging into complex urban areas. The energy systems and grid optimisation theme includes Applied Energy, Energies, Energy, Energy Reports, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, and Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. These journals are influential because they provide optimisation, modelling, and technical solutions required to balance EV charging with renewable energy and grid stability. The last theme on electric vehicles and charging innovations includes the World Electric Vehicle Journal, IEEE Access, ETransportation, and IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (Table 2). These journals are influential because they address technologies essential for supporting smart charging of electric vehicles. From the preceding results, research should integrate insights from urban sustainability, energy system optimisation, and EV charging technology innovations to advance smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas.

3.1.2. Most Productive Authors

Table 3 shows that Clairand, J-M. is the most productive author, with four publications, an h-index of 4, a g-index of 4, an m-index of 0.44, and 213 total citations computed from 2017. The author’s works focus on the smart charging of EVs, highlighting aggregator-based strategies that optimise costs, user preferences, and grid stability. These are influential works providing case studies and simulation-driven insights on smart charging strategies in EV integration in urban areas. Ahmad, I. is an influential author, with the highest total citations (TC = 340) from two publications. The author addresses the low adoption of EVs, focusing on smart charging strategies to reduce grid stress, charging time, and charging costs. Li, X. is the most productive veteran author, with three publications, an h-index of 3, a g-index of 3, and 147 total citations computed from 2014. The author’s influential works focus on smart urban EV charging, using pricing and communication strategies to optimise demand and the use of charging infrastructure. Andersen, P. is the most productive emerging author, with two publications, an m-index of 0.5, and 34 total citations computed from 2022. The author’s influential works focus on how synchronised charging behaviour driven by cost-based incentives can cause grid congestion. This shows that even well-intended incentives can create grid congestion that grid operators must address in planning and regulation. From the preceding results, research should integrate insights from user needs, grid efficiency, charging infrastructure, and cost incentives to advance smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas.

3.1.3. Most Productive Countries

The five leading countries in terms of scientific production frequencies are China (97), Italy (92), India (89), Germany (76), and the USA (70) (Table 4). China’s leadership can be attributed to its aggressive national policies promoting electric transport and investments in charging infrastructure. The emerging market of India is ranked second, with research efforts towards the need to address pollution and traffic congestion in its densely populated urban areas. European countries, led by Italy, Germany, the UK, and Sweden, represent the majority of the most productive countries on the topic. Research in most European countries primarily focuses on the use of renewable energy, grid optimisation, and urban infrastructure planning. Iran, a developing economy, was ranked among the most productive countries, with a frequency of 29. Research in Iran primarily focuses on cost-effective charging strategies and grid management solutions to support the growing urban areas. It was noted that developing economies from South America and Africa do not feature among the leading countries in scientific production on the topic (Table 4).

3.2. Science Mapping

3.2.1. Co-Authorship Analysis

The country collaboration map visually depicts the intensity (colours) and direction (lines) of collaboration amongst countries in a field [25]. The country collaboration map shows that strong collaborations (thicker lines) exist between Spain and Ecuador (Figure 2). The collaboration primarily focuses on user-responsive EV charging optimisation models that heavily rely on aggregators and are tested using simulated urban distribution networks. The USA collaborates with Canada, Iran, and Singapore. For instance, collaborations between the USA and Singapore primarily focus on electrifying on-demand vehicle fleets (i.e., ride-hailing) and the infrastructure, policy, and data integration required to facilitate this transition. The highest research output on the topic emanates from China, India, Germany, and the USA (dark blue colour). In contrast, the emerging/least research output (light blue colour) emanates from countries like South Africa, Kenya, Argentina, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and Australia (Figure 2). For instance, research in South Africa primarily focuses on how smart charging strategies can mitigate the strain on power grids to make large-scale EV adoption more feasible and sustainable.

3.2.2. Word Analysis

Word frequency analysis and word clouds were utilised to determine the most frequently used keywords on the topic and their relationships. The analysis identified 645 author keywords related to smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas (Table 1). The large number of keywords depicts the broad scope of research on this topic. Table 5 presents the top 50 most common keywords. Four main themes emerge: smart charging technologies, grid integration, green renewable energy, and urban mobility systems. The smart charging technologies theme includes keywords such as charging (batteries), charging station(s), charging infrastructures, charging systems, secondary batteries, charging strategies, charging systems, battery management systems, internet of things, learning systems, digital storage, and machine learning. Deploying smart charging technologies is necessary to support electric transport in urban areas. The grid integration theme includes keywords like vehicle-to-grid, electric power transmission networks, electric power distribution, distribution grid, smart grid, smart power grids, electric utilities, and vehicle-to-grid (V2G). This indicates that grid reliability is crucial in smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. The green renewable energy theme includes keywords such as renewable energy resources, renewable energies, solar energy, greenhouse gases, fossil fuels, environmental impact, energy efficiency, and energy management. This highlights the significance of aligning smart charging with renewable energy for sustainable electric transport in urban areas. The theme of urban mobility systems includes keywords like smart city, urban transportation, fleet operations, scheduling, distribution systems, commerce, and commercial vehicles (Table 5). Thus, smart charging should integrate reliable grids, renewable energy, and efficient urban mobility for sustainable electric transport.
A word cloud, which visually represents keywords in a text using different colours based on their frequency, was used to show the commonly used keywords and their relationships on the topic. Charging (batteries) is the most prominent keyword, located at the center of the word cloud (Figure 3). This implies that charging (batteries) is a key enabler of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. In the word cloud, charging (batteries) is surrounded by other large keywords like smart-grid, vehicle-to-grid, and electric power transmission networks. This indicates that battery charging is becoming a key component of modern grid networks that support smart charging in urban areas. Charging station, charging infrastructures, and charging strategies are placed on top of each other next to vehicle-to-grid in the word cloud. This indicates the logistical and deployment challenges. Keywords like internet of things, machine learning, learning systems, smart grid, energy storage, energy efficiency, and renewable energy resources are located at the edges of the word cloud. This suggests emerging technological innovations and renewable energy efforts in smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. Keywords like social acceptance, regulations, and policy frameworks are not represented in the word cloud (Figure 3).

3.2.3. Thematic Mapping

Thematic mapping visualises research on how important or developed topics are. It includes motor themes (first quadrant), which are both central and developed; basic themes (second quadrant), which are central but undeveloped; emerging or declining themes (third quadrant), which are both peripheral and undeveloped; and niche themes (fourth quadrant), which are peripheral yet well developed [27,30,31].
The motor theme (quadrant one) comprises keywords such as charging (batteries), charging station, electric power transmission networks, smart city, and secondary batteries (Figure 4). This represents technological and infrastructural systems that form the foundation (i.e., backbone) of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. They represent well-established areas that require supportive regulatory frameworks for large-scale deployment of smart charging in urban areas. The basic themes (quadrant two) relate to grid integration and sustainability concerns. The theme on grid integration includes keywords like smart charging, vehicle-to-grid, and electric power distribution, while the theme on sustainability concerns comprises keywords such as environmental impact, greenhouse gases, gas emissions, sustainable development, and traffic congestion. Since the themes are relevant but underexplored, there is a need for in-depth research to fully exploit the potential of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. The niche theme (quadrant four) relates to keywords such as electric buses, energy policy, transportation system, charging time, and demand analysis. To maximise the impact of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas, deeper insight into energy policies and demand analysis is necessary, guiding policymakers and researchers toward future priorities. The emerging or declining themes (quadrant three) include keywords like distribution transformer and electric transformer (Figure 4). They represent peripheral areas that may warrant monitoring or deprioritising of research efforts.

3.2.4. Citation Analysis

Citation analysis aids in evaluating influential publications on smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. Table 6 shows the most-cited publication on smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. The most influential article, with 37.56 citations per year, was by Moghaddam et al. [32], investigating the use of optimisation to find charging station locations that minimise charging time, travel time, and cost along the Washington City road network. The high number of citations per year implies that this is groundbreaking work on the topic, offering a multi-objective optimisation approach that addresses key EV adoption barriers such as EV charging time, cost, and idle waiting time.
The top-cited publications revealed four main themes: optimised smart charging, renewable energy integration, predictive charging control, and vehicle grid integration. The top-cited publications on optimised smart charging provide optimisation frameworks for reducing cost, improving grid stability, and enhancing scheduling efficiency [32,36,37]. However, most of the optimisation models are simulation-based and lack validation with real-world datasets, particularly in developing economies. Studies by Heinisch et al. [17] and Fachrizal et al. [22] showed that some research focuses on renewable energy integration to smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. While Fachrizal et al. [22] showed that a V2G scheme and a wind–PV electricity production share of 70:30 can be achieved in an optimal model, Heinisch et al. [17] estimated that 85% of the overall demand in charging electric cars is flexible, and smart charging strategies can enable up to 62% solar PV in the charging electricity mix. While most of the studies focus on the technical feasibility of integrating renewable energy into smart charging systems, they have overlooked regulatory readiness and user acceptance across different urban contexts. Some studies focus on predictive charging control, highlighting the use of artificial intelligence and predictive models to forecast charging station usage and energy demand. For instance, Ma and Faye [23] proposed a hybrid LSTSM neural network predicting the occupancy of EV charging stations in the United Kingdom. While the study shows the potential of artificial intelligence-driven predictive control, its application remains narrow and limited to a developed economy. Some studies also focus on vehicle grid integration [17,21,22,34,35]. Van Der Kam and Van Sark [21] simulated an optimisation model to study the increase in self-consumption of photovoltaic power by smart charging of electric vehicles and V2G technology in the Netherlands. Geng et al. [34] explored a smart charging management system considering transportation and power distribution systems. Fachrizal et al. [22] considered energy matching optimisation at the urban scale with smart EV charging and V2G technology in a net-zero energy city. Although these studies demonstrate the technical feasibility of integrating EVs with the grid, research gaps remain in using such models in real-world urban contexts and ensuring supportive policy frameworks.

4. Discussion

The findings presented in the previous section aid in uncovering four key themes used in the study of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas. These include smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies, grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems, renewable energy and environmental sustainability, and urban mobility systems and infrastructure development. The theme of smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies is identified from word analysis using keywords such as battery management, charging infrastructures, charging strategies, and machine learning. Clairand, J and Ahmad, I, identified as among the most productive authors, contribute significantly to the topic. They propose aggregator-based models and smart scheduling approaches aimed at balancing cost, user needs, and grid performance. In citation analysis, Ma and Faye [23] proposed a hybrid LSTSM neural network predicting the usage patterns of charging stations in the UK. Moghaddam et al. [32] also proposed a multi-objective optimisation model to find the optimal charging station along the Washington City road network, finding that the simulated solution reduces charging costs and waiting time. This study suggests that policymakers should integrate charging station planning into urban mobility to ensure equitable access while reducing congestion during the charging of electric vehicles.
The grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems theme relates to the role of electric mobility in supporting grid stability through two-way energy exchange, as seen in journals like Applied Energy. According to the word analysis, keywords like smart grid, electric power distribution, and V2G also support this theme. The top-cited publications reveal that V2G can improve load/energy matching in urban areas [22]. Thus, policymakers should prioritise incentivising V2G systems to support grid stability. The renewable energy and environmental sustainability theme relate to integrating solar, wind, and other green energy sources into smart charging systems. In agreement, Mogire et al. [38] found that the common research topics in electric mobility/electric vehicles often emphasise sustainability issues such as carbon footprint. The most productive journals, such as Energy, Energies, and the Energy Report, support this. In addition, keywords such as solar energy, greenhouse gases, energy efficiency, environmental impact, and sustainable development in the word analysis emphasise the environmental benefits of aligning smart charging with renewable energy. In relation to the top-cited publications, Heinisch et al. [17] found that up to 85% of the total charging demand for electric cars can be flexibly adjusted, and smart charging strategies can allow up to 62% solar PV in the EV charging electricity mix. Fachrizal et al. [22] also found that optimal load-matching performance is attained in a net-zero energy city with a V2G scheme and a wind–PV electricity production share of 70:30. This implies that renewable-based smart charging can achieve significant solar and wind PV electricity penetration in urban areas for electric mobility. For urban areas in developed economies, this provides an opportunity to decarbonise transportation, while for developing economies, it requires targeted subsidies and financial support to ensure grid stability and affordability concerns.
The urban mobility systems and infrastructure deployment theme focuses on integrating smart charging within the transportation networks in urban areas. Tole [15] indicates that smart charging addresses challenges such as difficulties in identifying charging stations, infrastructure costs, and overloads during peak periods, which are common in urban areas. The theme is supported by the most productive journals, such as Sustainable Cities and Society, and keywords like smart cities, urban transportation, fleet operations, scheduling, and distribution systems in word analysis. According to the top-cited publications, Moghaddam et al. [32] used a multi-objective optimisation model to find the optimal charging station along the Washington City road network, driving from Oregon to Vancouver, Canada. Optimising smart charging infrastructure placement significantly affects charging costs and waiting time. Integrating smart charging into urban mobility systems allows for more efficient traffic and energy management, especially in areas with high delivery vehicle volumes and limited parking availability [9,20]. However, limited attention was given to integrating smart charging with multimodal transport systems and urban planning frameworks. Policy makers in developing economies need to integrate the deployment of charging stations with multimodal transport systems to avoid fragmented development. This creates an opportunity for urban planners to incorporate charging infrastructure into land use policies.

5. Conclusions

This review noted a significant growth in research on smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas since 2017. The notable growth results from technological innovations, policy, and charging infrastructure developments. Furthermore, research on the topic predominantly focuses on four themes: smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies, grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems, renewable energy and environmental sustainability, and urban mobility systems and infrastructure development. Future research should aim to address the research gaps identified in the four themes.
  • Current research has found that smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies is an important theme. Most studies primarily focus on cost reduction, grid stability, and scheduling efficiency using simulation-based models. Future research should move beyond simulations to include surveys, large-scale pilot projects, and real-world testing of smart charging that incorporates dynamic data such as user satisfaction, environmental goals, and infrastructure limitations, especially in developing economies. Researchers should investigate real-world barriers, such as high implementation costs and limited policy frameworks, that may hinder the deployment of smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
  • Current research on the grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems theme focuses on how electric vehicles can support grid stability through two-way energy exchange, optimising load balancing and improving energy matching in urban areas with renewable energy sources. Future research should develop real-time models for large-scale V2G integration, investigate the effects on grid stability with renewable energy, and design policies to support V2G use, especially in developing economies. Policy challenges such as a lack of regulatory frameworks and a lack of incentives for V2G should be considered to support smart charging in urban areas.
  • Current research on the renewable energy and environmental sustainability theme mainly focuses on integrating renewable energy sources like wind and solar into smart charging systems to lower carbon emissions and increase energy efficiency. Future research should move beyond the environmental benefits of integrating renewable energy into smart charging and include other sustainability benefits like cost-effectiveness and user behaviour to promote widespread adoption. However, barriers such as insufficient storage capacity and variability of renewable energy supply need to be addressed to ensure large-scale implementation.
  • Current research on the urban mobility systems and infrastructure development theme focuses on placing smart charging stations in the right locations, improving traffic and energy flow, and supporting electric vehicles in busy urban areas. Future research should explore integrating smart charging stations with public transport, ridesharing, and logistics hubs to reduce congestion. In addition, future research should examine urban planning frameworks and policy instruments used by local governments to coordinate charging infrastructure rollout for smart mobility, especially in developing economies. However, attention should be given to challenges such as a lack of a policy framework and limited urban space that can delay effective deployment of smart charging in urban areas.
This review is limited to publications extracted from the Scopus database, which is recognised as a trusted source of bibliometric data. This may have excluded some niche publications relevant to the topic, constraining the breadth of insights in this review. Future researchers may consider other relevant databases like Web of Science, PubMed, and Science Direct to incorporate any overlooked publications. The review also restricted coverage of studies using a combination of keywords listed in the materials and methods section of this review. Although relevant, future researchers may consider emerging keywords to capture additional relevant studies for a more comprehensive review.
Overall, this review contributes to the theoretical understanding of smart charging for electric mobility in urban areas by identifying four critical research themes: smart charging technologies and optimisation strategies, grid integration and vehicle-to-grid systems, renewable energy and environmental sustainability, and urban mobility systems and infrastructure development. The review also emphasises shifting focus from simulation models to investing real-world implementation and supportive policy formulation, especially in developing economies. Urban planners and policymakers can use the theoretical framework to implement smart charging infrastructure that balances the four themes to ensure efficient energy use, grid stability, environmental sustainability, and smooth urban mobility. It also guides industry stakeholders to focus on real-world testing and integration of vehicle-to-grid systems and renewable energy sources to optimise costs and improve urban mobility.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; methodology, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; software, E.M.; validation, P.K. and R.L.; formal analysis, E.M.; investigation, E.M.; data curation, E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.; writing—review and editing, E.M., P.K. and R.L.; visualization, P.K. and R.L.; supervision, P.K. and R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Bank. Electric Mobility Assessment, Business Model and Action Plan in India. 2022. Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099651206172224743/pdf/IDU02131336d03f5c04f11093bd095d144caa38f.pdf (accessed on 29 May 2025).
  2. Martínez-Gómez, J.; Espinoza, V.S. Challenges and opportunities for electric vehicle charging stations in Latin America. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Senate Bill No. 1014; California Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program: Zero-Emission Vehicles. California State Legislature: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2018. Available online: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1014 (accessed on 5 July 2025).
  4. Nalin, A.; Simone, A.; Bellinato, L.; Vignali, V.; Lantieri, C. GIS-based analysis to locate electric vehicle charging stations in an urban environment: A case study in Bologna, Italy. Transp. Res. Procedia 2025, 90, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mlindelwa, S.; Chowdhury, S.D.; Lencwe, M.J. Overview of the challenges, developments, and solutions for electric vehicle charging infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 32nd Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC), Stellenbosch, South Africa, 24–25 January 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramesh, P.; Kumar Gouda, P.; Sandhya, S.; Dhanush, C.N.; Pavithra, Y.C.; Simran, S. Intelligent charging system for electric vehicle batteries. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronics, Computing, Communication and Control Technology (ICECCC), Bengaluru, India, 2–3 May 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Last mile delivery technologies for electronic commerce: A bibliometric review. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 2025, 23, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rancilio, G.; Bovera, F.; Delfanti, M. Slow but steady: Assessing the benefits of slow public EV charging infra-structure in metropolitan areas. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Trimboli, M.; Antonelli, N.; Avila, L. Optimal V2B management for a smart charging station with renewable energy resources. J. Reliab. Intell. Environ. 2025, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oni, O.; Longe, O. A study on electric vehicle footprint in South Africa. Energies 2024, 17, 6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mogire, E. Green innovations in last mile delivery. A research agenda. J. Innov. Bus. Ind. 2026, 4, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marxen, H.; Ansarin, M. Smart charging of EVs: Would you share your data for money? In the Proceedings of the Pre-ICIS Workshop Proceedings, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10–11 December 2022. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_proceedings_siggreen_2022/2 (accessed on 28 May 2025).
  13. Lukuyu, J.; Shirley, R.; Taneja, J. Managing grid impacts from increased electric vehicle adoption in African cities. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mao, R.; Xu, W.; Qian, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, H. Understanding the determinants of electric vehicle range: A multi-dimensional survey. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tole, S. An overview of the future smart charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Int. J. Appl. Power Eng. 2024, 13, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jeevitha, A.; Vasudeva Banninthaya, K.; Srikanth, G.S. Design and implementation of smart charging for LMV. In Intelligent Manufacturing and Energy Sustainability; Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Reddy, A., Marla, D., Favorskaya, M.N., Satapathy, S.C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; p. 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heinisch, V.; Göransson, L.; Erlandsson, R.; Hodel, H.; Johnsson, F.; Odenberger, M. Smart electric vehicle charging strategies for sectoral coupling in a city energy system. Appl. Energy 2021, 288, 116640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khan, W.; Ahmad, F.; Ahmad, A.; Alam, M.S.; Ahuja, A. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in India: Viability analysis. In ISGW 2017: Compendium of Technical Papers; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Pillai, R., Ghatikar, G., Seethapathy, R., Sonavane, V.L., Khaparde, S.A., Yemula, P.K., Chaudhuri, S., Venkateswaran, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Doda, D.; Beemkumar, N.; Awasthi, A.; Gautam, A. Electric vehicle energy management: Charging in sustainable urban settings for smart cities. E3S Web Conf. 2024, 540, 02022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. World Economic Forum. The Future of the Last-Mile Ecosystem. 2020. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-the-last-mile-ecosystem/ (accessed on 19 May 2025).
  21. Van Der Kam, M.; Van Sark, W. Smart charging of electric vehicles with photovoltaic power and vehicle-to-grid technology in a microgrid: A case study. Appl. Energy 2015, 152, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fachrizal, R.; Qian, K.; Lindberg, O.; Shepero, M.; Adam, R.; Widén, J.; Munkhammar, J. Urban-scale energy matching optimization with smart EV charging and V2G in a net-zero energy city powered by wind and solar energy. ETransportation 2024, 20, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, T.Y.; Faye, S. Multistep electric vehicle charging station occupancy prediction using hybrid LSTM neural networks. Energy 2022, 244, 123217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salmani, H.; Rezazadeh, A.; Sedighizadeh, M. Robust stochastic blockchain model for peer-to-peer energy trading among charging stations of electric vehicles. J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng. 2024, 12, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Electric vehicles in last-mile delivery: A bibliometric review. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An over-view and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luke, R.; Mageto, J. Impact of China’s belt and road initiative on logistics management in Africa: A bibliometric analysis. J. Int. Logist. Trade 2023, 21, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baas, J.; Schotten, M.; Plume, A.; Côté, G.; Karimi, R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2020, 1, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bakhmat, N.; Kolosova, O.; Demchenko, O.; Ivashchenko, I.; Strelchuk, V. Application of international scientometric databases in the process of training competitive research and teaching staff: Opportunities of Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Google Scholar. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2022, 100, 4914–4924. [Google Scholar]
  30. Callon, M.; Courtial, J.P.; Laville, F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991, 22, 155–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mageto, J. Current and future trends of information technology and sustainability in logistics outsourcing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moghaddam, Z.; Ahmad, I.; Habibi, D.; Phung, Q.V. Smart charging strategy for electric vehicle charging stations. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2017, 4, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fachrizal, R.; Shepero, M.; van der Meer, D.; Munkhammar, J.; Widén, J. Smart charging of electric vehicles considering photovoltaic power production and electricity consumption: A review. ETransportation 2020, 4, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Geng, L.; Lu, Z.; He, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Guo, X. Smart charging management system for electric vehicles in coupled transportation and power distribution systems. Energy 2019, 189, 116275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sadeghian, O.; Nazari-Heris, M.; Abapour, M.; Taheri, S.S.; Zare, K. Improving reliability of distribution networks using plug-in electric vehicles and demand response. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2019, 7, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khaksari, A.; Tsaousoglou, G.; Makris, P.; Steriotis, K.; Efthymiopoulos, N.; Varvarigos, E. Sizing of electric vehicle charging stations with smart charging capabilities and quality of service requirements. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 70, 102872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, J.; Wang, G.; Wang, X.; Du, Y. Smart charging strategy for electric vehicles based on marginal carbon emission factors and time-of-use price. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 96, 104708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Green innovations in last mile delivery for e-commerce: A bibliometric review. In Proceedings of the 17th International Business Conference (IBC), Stellenbosch, South Africa, 22–25 September 2024; Available online: https://internationalbusinessconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CP171-Mogire-Green-Innovations-final-Corrected.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2025).
Figure 1. Number of publications per year on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Figure 1. Number of publications per year on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Energies 18 04655 g001
Figure 2. Country collaboration map on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Figure 2. Country collaboration map on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Energies 18 04655 g002
Figure 3. The word cloud on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Figure 3. The word cloud on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Energies 18 04655 g003
Figure 4. The thematic map on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Figure 4. The thematic map on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Energies 18 04655 g004
Table 1. Key information concerning the publications on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 1. Key information concerning the publications on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Description Results
Timespan2011:2025
Sources (Journals, Books, etc.)130
Documents201
Annual Growth Rate %19.42
Document Average Age4.17
Average Citations per Doc17.56
References5935
DOCUMENT CONTENTS
Keywords Plus (ID)1484
Author’s Keywords (DE)645
AUTHORS
Authors737
Authors of Single-Authored Docs12
AUTHORS COLLABORATION
Single-Authored Docs12
Co-Authors per Doc3.97
International Co-Authorships %20.4
DOCUMENT TYPES
Article89
Book Chapter13
Conference Paper97
Review2
Table 2. Top 15 most productive journals on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 2. Top 15 most productive journals on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
RankJournalh-Indexg-Indexm-IndexTCNPPY_Start
1Sustainable Cities and Society671.217172021
2World Electric Vehicle Journal6100.857105122019
3Applied Energy570.45549072015
4Energies570.62513872018
5IEEE Access450.518652018
6Sustainability440.6678642020
7Etransportation330.526232020
8IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting330.2148532012
92020 15th International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies, EVER 2020220.3331522020
10Applied Sciences220.2862622019
11Energy230.28620732019
12Energy Reports220.51822022
13IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications220.1679122014
14IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid220.45522021
15Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy220.28617422019
Table 3. Top 15 most productive authors on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 3. Top 15 most productive authors on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
RankAuthorh-Indexg-Indexm-IndexTCNPPY_Start
1Clairand, J.-M.440.44421342017
2Li, X.330.2514732014
3Pasetti, M.330.3757632018
4Ahmad, I.220.22234022017
5Alvarez-Bel, C.220.2517522018
6Andersen, P.220.53422022
7Bruno, R.220.1672422014
8Chen, J.220.3335222020
9Chen, Z.220.42222021
10Chu, C.-C.220.2512422018
11Fachrizal, R.220.33324922020
12Ferrari, P.220.256922018
13Finke, S.220.41422021
14Flammini, A.220.256922018
15Gadh, R.220.2512422018
Table 4. Top 15 countries’ scientific production on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 4. Top 15 countries’ scientific production on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
RankCountryFrequency
1China97
2Italy92
3India89
4Germany76
5USA70
6UK32
7Sweden31
8Iran29
9The Netherlands29
10Spain29
11Austria20
12Denmark17
13Belgium16
14Finland15
15Portugal14
Table 5. Top 50 most frequent words on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 5. Top 50 most frequent words on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
RankWord(s)OccurrencesRankWord(s)Occurrences
1charging (batteries)9726fleet operations10
2vehicle-to-grid4827power10
3electric power transmission networks3328distribution grid9
4charging station3129scheduling9
5smart city2530vehicle-to-grid (v2g)9
6charging infrastructures2331vehicle to grids9
7electric power distribution2132charging systems8
8secondary batteries2133distribution systems8
9optimisation2034energy management8
10charging strategies1935internet of things8
11smart grid1836solar energy8
12energy utilisation1737stochastic systems8
13smart power grids1738battery management systems7
14electric utilities1539renewable energy source7
15renewable energy resources1540charging demands6
16urban transportation1541commerce6
17costs1442digital storage6
18electric loads1343economics6
19charging stations1244energy storage6
20fossil fuels1245environmental impact6
21investments1246flexibility6
22renewable energies1247greenhouse gases6
23energy1148learning systems6
24energy efficiency1149machine learning6
25state of charge1150commercial vehicles5
Table 6. Top 10 most cited publications based on total citations per year on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
Table 6. Top 10 most cited publications based on total citations per year on smart charging for e-mobility in urban areas.
RankAuthorsTotal Citations Per YearTitleJournalSummary
1.Moghaddam et al. [32]37.56Smart charging strategy for electric vehicle charging stationsIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationThe study used a multi-objective optimisation model to find the optimal charging station along the Washington City road network from Oregon to Vancouver, Canada. The aim was to ensure minimum charging time, charging cost, and travel time. Simulations showed that the proposed solution greatly reduces charging costs and waiting time.
2.Fachrizal et al. [33]35.33Smart charging of electric vehicles considering photovoltaic power production and electricity consumption: a reviewETransportationThe study reviewed studies on smart charging considering photovoltaic power production and electricity consumption. Smart charging aspects that were reviewed included configurations, objectives, algorithms, and mathematical models.
3. Van Der Kam and Van Sark [21]27.36Smart charging of electric vehicles with photovoltaic power and vehicle-to-grid technology in a microgrid; a case studyApplied energyThe study used a linear optimisation model to study the increase in the self-consumption of photovoltaic power through smart charging of electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid technology in the Netherlands. The aim was to ensure minimum charging time, charging cost, and travel time. Simulations showed that self-consumption rises from 49% to 62–87%, and demand peaks reduce by 27–67%.
4.Ma and Faye [23]23.50Multistep electric vehicle charging station occupancy prediction using hybrid LSTM neural networksEnergyThe study proposed a hybrid LSTSM neural network predicting the occupancy of EV charging stations in the United Kingdom. Results showed a strong potential for improvement of charging station occupancy prediction methods, allowing EV-based mobility service operators to develop smart charging scheduling strategies.
5.Fachrizal et al. [22]18.50Urban-scale energy matching optimisation with smart EV charging and V2G in a net-zero energy city powered by wind and solar energyETransportationThe case study assessed the optimal energy-matching potentials in a net-zero energy city in Sweden. Simulation results showed that the optimal load-matching performance is attained in a net-zero energy city with a V2G scheme and a wind–PV electricity production share of 70:30.
6.Geng et al. [34]15.86Smart charging management system for electric vehicles in coupled transportation and power distribution systems EnergyThe study proposes a smart charging management system that considers EV users’ elastic response to electricity charging prices in Sweden. Simulation results showed that the system effectively improves voltage quality, and reduces operational costs in distribution and total traffic delay cost.
7.Heinisch et al. [17]15.60Smart electric vehicle charging strategies for sectoral coupling in a city energy systemApplied EnergyThe study examined how integrating EVs with smart charging can help cities to achieve net-zero emissions. Up to 85% of the overall demand in charging electric cars is flexible, and smart charging strategies can enable up to 62% solar PV in the charging electricity mix.
8.Sadeghian et al. [35]14.14Improving reliability of distribution networks using plug-in electric vehicles and demand responseJournal of Modern Power Systems and Clean EnergyThe study aims to improve distribution system reliability using demand response programs and smart charging of PEVs in Iran. Simulation results showed that the system effectively enhances reliability and network performance.
9.Khaksari et al. [36]14.00Sizing of electric vehicle charging stations with smart charging capabilities and quality of service requirementsSustainable Cities and SocietyThe study provides an optimisation framework that minimises the investment cost of charging station operators, subject to achieving a certain quality of service for their clients. Results showed significant variation in the
choice of charger types based on the charging control model in the charging station.
10. Li et al. [37]12.67Smart charging strategy for electric vehicles based on marginal carbon emission factors and time-of-use priceSustainable Cities and SocietyThe study proposes a smart charging strategy based on an improved local search genetic algorithm that considers both the time-of-use price and marginal emission factors. Results showed that the smart charging strategy reduces cost by 27% and emissions by 16% compared to uncontrolled charging.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mogire, E.; Kilbourn, P.; Luke, R. Smart Charging for E-Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review. Energies 2025, 18, 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174655

AMA Style

Mogire E, Kilbourn P, Luke R. Smart Charging for E-Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review. Energies. 2025; 18(17):4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mogire, Eric, Peter Kilbourn, and Rose Luke. 2025. "Smart Charging for E-Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review" Energies 18, no. 17: 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174655

APA Style

Mogire, E., Kilbourn, P., & Luke, R. (2025). Smart Charging for E-Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review. Energies, 18(17), 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174655

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop