Next Article in Journal
Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Air Capture Using Pyrolysis and Gasification Chars: Key Findings and Future Research Needs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency

by
Osman Emre Özçiflikçi
1,2,*,
Mikail Koç
1 and
Serkan Bahçeci
3
1
Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir 40100, Turkey
2
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38039, Turkey
3
Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38030, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(15), 4118; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154118 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 27 July 2025 / Accepted: 1 August 2025 / Published: 3 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Control Strategies of Permanent Magnet Motor Drive)

Abstract

Interior-mounted permanent magnet (IPM) machines have been widely used in recent years due to their high efficiency, high torque/power densities, and so on. These machines can produce reluctance torque whereas their surface-mounted (SPM) counterparts cannot. Hence, IPMs are attractive in industrial applications that require high torque density. Id = 0 control is commonly adopted to drive permanent magnet (PM) machines, and the strategy is attractive due to its simplicity. However, although it is suitable for SPMs, adopting it in IPMs sacrifices the reluctance torque that can be obtained from the machine. Hence, it is vital to control IPMs using the maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) strategy. This paper adopts the MTPA strategy for a 4.1 kW prototype IPM machine. Test system configuration is discussed step by step by paying particular attention to potential practical issues and inspirational discussions on their solutions. The issues associated with misaligned rotor positions or whistling problems pertinent to inappropriate power conversion strategies are addressed to overcome such issues in practical IPM drives. Comprehensive discussions and extensive comparisons of well-matched simulation and experimental results of both Id = 0- and MTPA-controlled drives at different evaluation metrics will be quite insightful to achieve efficiency-optimized IPM drives.
Keywords: IPM; Id = 0 control; MTPA; initial position angle IPM; Id = 0 control; MTPA; initial position angle

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Özçiflikçi, O.E.; Koç, M.; Bahçeci, S. Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency. Energies 2025, 18, 4118. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154118

AMA Style

Özçiflikçi OE, Koç M, Bahçeci S. Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency. Energies. 2025; 18(15):4118. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Özçiflikçi, Osman Emre, Mikail Koç, and Serkan Bahçeci. 2025. "Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency" Energies 18, no. 15: 4118. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154118

APA Style

Özçiflikçi, O. E., Koç, M., & Bahçeci, S. (2025). Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency. Energies, 18(15), 4118. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop