Next Article in Journal
A Stackelberg Game for Co-Optimization of Distribution System Operator Revenue and Virtual Power Plant Costs with Integrated Data Center Flexibility
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Maximum Torque per Ampere Control Method for Interior Permanent Magnet Machine Drives on dSpace with Emphasis on Potential Practical Issues for High Energy Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion

1
State Key Laboratory of Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
China North Engine Research Institute, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(15), 4121; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154121 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 30 July 2025 / Accepted: 1 August 2025 / Published: 3 August 2025

Abstract

This study proposes an innovative Thermodynamic Activity Controlled Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (TAC-HCCI) strategy for diesel–natural gas dual-fuel engines, aiming to achieve high thermal efficiency while maintaining low emissions. By employing numerical simulation methods, the effects of the intake pressure, intake temperature, EGR rate, intake valve closing timing, diesel injection timing, diesel injection pressure, and diesel injection quantity on engine combustion, energy distribution, and emission characteristics were systematically investigated. Through a comprehensive analysis of optimized operating conditions, a high-efficiency and low-emission TAC-HCCI combustion technology for dual-fuel engines was developed. The core mechanism of TAC-HCCI combustion control was elucidated through an analysis of the equivalence ratio and temperature distribution of the in-cylinder mixture. The results indicate that under the constraints of PCP ≤ 30 ± 1 MPa and RI ≤ 5 ± 0.5 MW/m2, the TAC-HCCI technology achieves a gross indicated mean effective pressure (IMEPg) of 24.0 bar, a gross indicated thermal efficiency (ITEg) of up to 52.0%, and indicated specific NOx emissions (ISNOx) as low as 1.0 g/kW∙h. To achieve low combustion loss, reduced heat transfer loss, and high thermal efficiency, it is essential to ensure the complete combustion of the mixture while maintaining low combustion temperatures. Moreover, a reduced diesel injection quantity combined with a high injection pressure can effectively suppress NOx emissions.

1. Introduction

Natural gas exhibits favorable characteristics for achieving low CO2 emissions and enhancing engine thermal efficiency, including a low carbon-to-hydrogen ratio, minimal exergy loss, a high specific heat ratio, and excellent anti-knock properties [1,2,3]. As the cleanest-burning fossil fuel, its widespread adoption helps address contemporary societal challenges related to energy conservation and emission reduction. Accordingly, natural gas engines have attracted significant scholarly attention and extensive research efforts in recent years [4,5,6].
Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) enables multi-point auto-ignition within the cylinder, thereby achieving a high degree of constant volume combustion, which contributes to enhanced thermal efficiency. Furthermore, the controlled equivalence ratio and combustion temperature of the mixture effectively prevent the formation of NOx and soot, enabling clean combustion [7,8,9]. However, under high-load conditions, HCCI combustion encounters limitations due to excessively rapid heat release rates and elevated pressure rise rates (PRRs), thereby constraining the potential for load expansion [10,11]. Johansson et al. [12] investigated the influence of boost pressure on load expansion in HCCI combustion using iso-octane, ethanol, and natural gas in engines. The results indicated that natural gas, owing to its higher octane number, achieved the highest load (14 bar IMEP) compared to other tested fuels. HCCI combustion demonstrated high thermal efficiency and low NOx emissions. However, it was associated with relatively high unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) emissions. Subsequently, Johansson et al. [13] further extended the operating load range of natural gas HCCI combustion by integrating boost technology with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and variable compression ratio strategies. A maximum load of 16 bar IMEPg and an indicated thermal efficiency of 46% were achieved. Throughout the experimental study, the peak cylinder pressure remained below 200 bar.
Theoretically, HCCI combustion can achieve high efficiency only in proximity to the knocking combustion region. However, extending the operating load range under such conditions presents considerable challenges, necessitating an enrichment and expansion of the HCCI combustion concept. Moreover, the HCCI ignition and combustion rate are highly sensitive to variations in the thermodynamic reactivity of the mixture, making the control of ignition timing and heat release difficult [10,14,15]. Kokjohn and Reitz et al. [16] proposed Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) combustion. In this mode, a low-reactivity fuel (e.g., gasoline, ethanol, natural gas) is port-injected to form a premixed charge. In contrast, a high-reactivity fuel (e.g., diesel, biodiesel) is directly injected early or injected via multiple injections into the cylinder. By adjusting the ratio of the two fuels and the injection strategy of the direct-injected fuel, the in-cylinder mixture concentration and fuel reactivity stratification can be precisely controlled. RCCI combustion enables sequential, staged combustion, thereby achieving the effective regulation of auto-ignition and combustion phasing [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Nieman et al. [24] employed numerical simulation combined with a genetic algorithm to optimize parameters, including the methane mass percentage, dual diesel injection timing, diesel injection quantity, diesel injection pressure, and EGR rate, across various loads (4~23 bar). The results indicated that a peak indicated thermal efficiency of 50.6% was achieved at an IMEP of 11 bar. At 23 bar IMEP, the indicated thermal efficiency reached 48.7%, exhibiting two-stage combustion where the premixed methane and the first diesel injection behaved similarly to HCCI combustion. Walkers et al. [25] investigated load expansion for gasoline/diesel and natural gas/diesel RCCI in a heavy-duty diesel engine. The findings revealed that natural gas/diesel RCCI enabled higher load expansion compared to gasoline/diesel RCCI. Using fitting methods, natural gas/diesel RCCI achieved 15.4 bar IMEPg at CA50 = 0° ATDC and 17.3 bar IMEPg under specific CA50 conditions. Hanson et al. [26] applied Adaptive Injection Strategies to extend natural gas/diesel RCCI to full load (22 bar BMEP) on a heavy-duty diesel engine. The study showed that eliminating EGR minimized pumping losses and maximized exhaust energy for potential recovery. Therefore, EGR was excluded from the load expansion investigation. Notably, at loads exceeding 20 bar BMEP, the natural gas mass fraction fell below 40%, indicating a shift toward predominantly diesel diffusion combustion.
To achieve high thermal efficiency and load expansion in natural gas engines while addressing the challenge of combustion phasing control in HCCI, this study proposes Thermodynamic Activity Controlled Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (TAC-HCCI) combustion. This approach focuses on controlling in-cylinder mixture thermodynamic parameters, such as the temperature, pressure, and equivalence ratio. Combustible homogeneous mixtures are prepared through the injection of natural gas into the intake port or direct in-cylinder injection. Thermodynamic activity is regulated by adjusting the intake temperature, intake pressure, EGR rate, and intake valve closing timing, while micro-pilot fuel characteristics are optimized through the diesel injection timing, quantity, and pressure, ultimately enabling precise control over in-cylinder mixture ignition and combustion. Adjusting the compression ratio of an engine can significantly influence its performance [27]. Based on this principle, the present study modifies the intake valve closing timing to alter both the effective compression ratio and the intake charge, thereby enabling the further regulation of the in-cylinder mixture’s equivalence ratio, along with the temperature and pressure prior to ignition. To achieve a higher engine load and thermal efficiency, numerical simulations were conducted under the constraints of Peak Cylinder Pressure (PCP) ≤ 30 ± 1 MPa and Ringing Intensity (RI) ≤ 5 ± 0.5 MW/m2. The research investigates combustion characteristics, energy distribution, emissions, and engine performance optimization under TAC-HCCI combustion. Through an in-depth analysis of the optimized operating conditions, a TAC-HCCI combustion strategy is developed for diesel/natural gas dual-fuel engines, enabling high thermal efficiency and low emissions. The study elucidates the key mechanisms of TAC-HCCI combustion control by analyzing the equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of the in-cylinder mixture. These findings provide theoretical support for the practical development and application of diesel/natural gas engines. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 outlines the methodology employed in the study. Section 3 provides an analysis of the results, covering the combustion characteristic, energy distribution characteristic, emission characteristic, and equivalence ratio and temperature distribution characteristic. Finally, Section 4 presents the conclusions of this study.

2. Methodology

2.1. Experimental Setup

This study employs a single-cylinder test engine system modified from a six-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine. The main parameters of the engine are shown in Table 1. The diesel/natural gas dual-fuel engine test system primarily comprises an independently developed Electronic Control Unit (ECU), a fuel/gas supply system, a simulated turbocharged intake system, an EGR system, a pseudo Miller cycle mechanism, and an exhaust emission measurement system, as illustrated in Figure 1. During testing, cylinders 1–5 operate as driving cylinders, utilizing a high-pressure common rail injection system and operating in a pure diesel combustion mode. Within the scope of this study, this solely provides the required engine speed. The sixth cylinder serves as the test cylinder, with its intake and exhaust systems, fuel supply system, and electronic control system completely independent from those of the driving cylinders. An external air compressor supplies the intake charge for the test cylinder, and the intake ports are equipped with an intake heating device. Within the exhaust pipeline, an EGR valve regulates the opening and closing of the recirculation line located upstream of the back pressure valve (Maximum EGR rate = 60%). Sampling probes from various emission measurement instruments are installed within the exhaust system. During testing, data acquisition and real-time monitoring are conducted for parameters such as the cylinder pressure, intake temperature, intake pressure, exhaust temperature, exhaust pressure, coolant temperature, and oil temperature. To mitigate the influence of cycle-to-cycle variations, all collected data represent the average value obtained over 100 consecutive engine cycles.

2.2. Model and Validation

In TAC-HCCI combustion, natural gas is injected through the intake port, under the assumption that the mixture is uniformly distributed within the cylinder. The diesel injector is equipped with nine evenly spaced holes, and the computational domain of the engine corresponds to 1/9 of the combustion chamber. A schematic diagram of the engine combustion chamber is presented in Figure 2. Blue, red and black respectively represent the cylinder head, piston and liner. Multidimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted using the CONVERGE 2.3 solver (Convergent Science Inc., Madison, WI, USA). For the selection of key physical models and chemical sub-models, reference is made to a previously published study [28]. In the simulation setup, the base grid size is set to 4 mm. To improve the stability of the in-cylinder computation, local mesh refinement is applied in the diesel spray region. The minimum CFD calculation cell size reaches 0.0625 mm, and the maximum grid count is approximately 350,000 cells. The simulation begins at a 146° crank angle (CA) before top dead center (TDC) of the compression stroke and concludes at 131° CA after TDC. Additionally, the composition of the natural gas used in the simulation consists of 98.8% CH4, 0.4% C2H6, and 0.8% N2.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 present the comparison results of the cylinder pressure, heat release rate, and emissions for TAC-HCCI combustion under operating conditions 01, 02 and 03, based on both experimental and simulation data. The deviations in peak cylinder pressure (Pmax) for conditions 01, 02, and 03 are 0.8%, 2.2%, and 3.0%, respectively. The discrepancies in crank angle positions corresponding to Pmax are 0.3 °CA, 0.6 °CA, and 1.5 °CA, respectively. By comparing the apparent heat release rate (AHRR) curves obtained from experiments and simulations, it can be seen that although there are certain deviations, the overall shapes of the two remain consistent. Regarding emissions, the errors in CO emissions are 8.2%, 4.6%, and 9.7%; the errors in UHC emissions are 8.9%, 4.0%, and 15.4%; and the errors in NOx emissions are 11.4%, 9.0%, and 18.0%, respectively. These results indicate that the proposed model is capable of accurately predicting the engine’s combustion and emission characteristics. Furthermore, the validation of diesel spray characteristics can be referenced from a previously published study [28].
To break through the limitation of the test engine’s explosion pressure (20 MPa) and achieve a higher load and thermal efficiency in the engine, this paper mainly conducts research through numerical simulation, and the experimental data are mainly used to verify the feasibility of the model. The engine speed was maintained at a constant 1300 rpm for all operating conditions, with the total heat input from diesel and natural gas within the cylinder kept consistent (IMEPg 24.0 bar). The variable parameters primarily included the intake pressure, intake temperature, EGR rate (the ratio of the mass of exhaust gas introduced into the cylinder during each engine cycle to the total mass of the in-cylinder gas mixture), intake valve closing timing, diesel injection timing, diesel injection pressure, and pilot diesel quantity.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Combustion Characteristic

Figure 5 presents the engine PCP and RI under TAC-HCCI combustion, where RI represents the degree of rough combustion, which is related to the maximum pressure rise rate, the highest combustion pressure, the highest combustion temperature, etc. However, when RI ≤ 5 MW/m2, it is considered that no rough combustion has occurred; when RI > 5 MW/m2, it is believed that rough combustion will be triggered. The definition of RI can be obtained in reference [29]. The numerical values in the annotations of the figure represent, in order, the intake pressure (bar), intake temperature (°C), EGR rate (%), intake valve closing timing (° CA ATDC), diesel injection pressure (bar), diesel injection quantity (mg), and equivalence ratio (-). It is also worth emphasizing that, under the conditions defined by the aforementioned variable parameters, the in-cylinder combustion process is regulated through adjustments to the diesel injection timing, where the abscissa in the figure represents the diesel injection timing. The annotations in subsequent figures follow the same interpretation.
As shown in Figure 5, delaying the diesel injection timing and reducing the diesel injection quantity can effectively lower both PCP and RI. A high intake pressure decreases the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio, which contributes to reduced PCP and RI. A low intake temperature also helps reduce PCP and RI, primarily because it lowers both the mixture equivalence ratio and the pre-ignition temperature, thereby reducing the thermodynamic activity of the mixture and slowing the combustion heat release rate. The EGR rate has a relatively minor effect on the PCP and RI, likely due to the limited variation range of the EGR applied in this study, which was designed to maintain sufficient boost energy. Delaying IVCT can effectively reduce PCP; its effectiveness is constrained by the RI limit (≤5 ± 0.5 MW/m2) beyond a certain delay threshold. Increasing the diesel injection pressure raises both the PCP and RI, as a higher diesel injection pressure enhances diesel spray diffusion, leading to a larger initial ignition zone and an earlier combustion phase.
A brief description of the special operating conditions (case 01, 02, 03, and 04) marked in Figure 5 is provided below. These important operating conditions will be discussed and analyzed in detail in the following sections.
Figure 6 presents the combustion phase of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. As shown in Figure 6a, the combustion phase CA10, which indicates the ignition timing, remains nearly constant when varying the intake pressure, intake temperature, EGR rate, and IVCT. Delaying diesel injection, reducing the diesel injection pressure, and decreasing the injection quantity can all significantly delay the combustion phase CA10. Therefore, adjusting diesel-related parameters in TAC-HCCI combustion enables effective control over the ignition timing of the in-cylinder mixture. As illustrated in Figure 6b, the combustion phase CA50 is strongly influenced by the diesel injection timing. However, variations in the intake pressure, intake temperature, EGR rate, IVCT, diesel injection pressure, and diesel injection quantity have a more pronounced effect on the combustion phase CA50 compared to CA10. Increasing the intake pressure significantly delays the CA50. An increase in the EGR rate has a relatively minor influence on both CA10 and CA50. Elevating the intake pressure, delaying IVCT, and applying a higher diesel injection pressure tend to advance CA50, whereas reducing the diesel injection quantity results in a delayed CA50.
Figure 7 presents the combustion duration (CA90-CA10) of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. As shown in Figure 7, retarding the diesel injection timing leads to an extended combustion duration. The combustion duration generally increases with higher intake pressure. However, when the intake pressure is increased from 3.8 bar to 4.1 bar, the combustion duration remains nearly constant at diesel injection timings of −7° CA ATDC, −6° CA ATDC, and −5° CA ATDC, respectively. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that as the intake pressure rises, the equivalence ratio of the in-cylinder mixture decreases, resulting in reduced mixture activity and a prolonged combustion duration. However, further increases in intake pressure elevate the pre-ignition pressure within the cylinder, thereby enhancing the mixture activity and shortening the combustion duration. Retarding IVCT generally extends the combustion duration, although this effect diminishes when the diesel injection timing is significantly delayed (later than −1° CA ATDC). Increasing the diesel injection pressure reduces the combustion duration, with a more pronounced effect observed when diesel injection is retarded. Reducing the quantity of diesel injection prolongs the combustion duration.

3.2. Energy Distribution Characteristics

Figure 8 presents the gross indicated thermal efficiency (ITEg) and combustion loss (CL) of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. As shown in Figure 8a, delaying diesel injection timing results in an initial increase followed by a decrease in ITEg, indicating the presence of an optimal diesel injection timing that maximizes ITEg. Increasing the intake pressure in conjunction with moderately advancing the diesel injection timing contributes to achieving higher ITEg. Under varying intake temperatures, the optimal diesel injection timing becomes increasingly delayed as the intake temperature decreases. Moreover, adjusting the diesel injection timing at a lower intake temperature (50 °C) is beneficial for improving the thermal efficiency of the engine. However, operating without EGR is more favorable for achieving high ITEg. As IVCT is delayed, the diesel injection timing must be advanced to maintain optimal thermal efficiency. Nevertheless, an IVCT of −146° CA ATDC is advantageous for achieving high ITEg. Notably, when the intake pressure and temperature are 3.8 bar and 50 °C, respectively, and the IVCT (−60° CA ATDC) and EGR rate (20%) are applied (case 02), even significantly advancing the diesel injection timing leads to a severe deterioration in engine thermal efficiency. Simultaneously increasing the diesel injection pressure and reducing the diesel quantity proves more effective in enhancing thermal efficiency. When the intake pressure and temperature are 4.1 bar and 50 °C, respectively, the diesel injection pressure is 1600 bar, the diesel injection quantity is 2 mg, the diesel injection timing is −11° CA ATDC, IVCT is −146° CA ATDC, and the EGR rate is 0%, the thermal efficiency optimization case (case 03) is achieved, yielding an ITEg of 52.0%. To further illustrate the potential of TAC-HCCI combustion to improve engine thermal efficiency, Figure 8a indicates that the maximum ITEg achievable without constraints on PCP and RI is 52.2% (case 04), with diesel injection timing set at −11° CA ATDC.
As illustrated in Figure 8b, under varying intake pressures, intake temperatures, EGR rates, IVCTs, diesel injection pressures, and diesel injection quantities, CL increases significantly when the diesel injection timing is delayed beyond a certain threshold. In TAC-HCCI combustion, earlier diesel injection timing, a lower intake pressure, higher intake temperature, earlier IVCT, and reduced EGR rate are conducive to achieving lower CL. Notably, the case 03 achieves near-zero CL (0.15%), primarily due to earlier diesel injection and a higher diesel pressure. In contrast, CL in case 02 deteriorates significantly, exceeding 7.0%, which is the primary factor contributing to the substantial decline in ITEg, despite relatively advanced CA10 and CA50 values. For case 01, although the intake pressure is lower, the higher in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio (φ = 0.53) enhances mixture reactivity. Consequently, even with diesel injection timing delayed to 2° CA ATDC, CL remains relatively low at approximately 1.0%. This case is considered to represent a baseline condition with the excessively high thermodynamic activity of the mixture.
Figure 9 presents the heat transfer loss (HTL) and exhaust loss (EL) of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. As illustrated in Figure 9a, the overall HTL in TAC-HCCI combustion is relatively low, predominantly below 12.0%. This is primarily attributed to the uniform distribution of natural gas within the combustion chamber, which preserves the low-temperature combustion advantage characteristic of HCCI combustion. An elevated intake pressure, reduced intake temperature, and increased EGR rate all contribute to lower HTL. Notably, as IVCT is delayed, the HTL initially decreases and subsequently increases. This behavior is mainly due to the reduction in the effective compression ratio caused by delayed IVCT, which lowers the pre-ignition mixture temperature and facilitates lower combustion temperatures. However, with a further delay in IVCT, the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio significantly increases, leading to higher combustion temperatures. Additionally, a lower diesel injection pressure and reduced diesel injection quantity help minimize HTL.
As illustrated in Figure 9b, the engine EL increases with the retardation of diesel injection timing. This is primarily due to the delayed combustion phase (CA10, CA50) caused by late diesel injection, which results in a higher exhaust temperature. With increasing intake pressure, EL initially rises and then decreases. This behavior can be attributed to the fact that a higher intake pressure leads to a greater exhaust volume, thereby increasing EL. However, a higher intake pressure corresponds to a lower mixture equivalence ratio, which reduces the combustion temperature and subsequently lowers the exhaust temperature. Therefore, EL is determined by the combined effects of exhaust volume and exhaust temperature. When diesel injection timing is retarded, EL under a high intake temperature first remains lower than that under a low intake temperature and then becomes higher. This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that, at earlier diesel injection timings, the combustion of the in-cylinder mixture is more complete, with minimal differences in post-combustion temperatures. In such cases, EL mainly depends on exhaust volume, where a lower intake temperature correlates with a higher exhaust volume. When diesel injection timing is significantly delayed, combustion deteriorates, and a higher intake temperature causes a substantial increase in the exhaust temperature, leading to higher EL. Delaying IVCT also increases EL. In contrast, the diesel injection pressure and injection quantity have minimal influence on EL.
Case 01 achieves low CL and low HTL; however, the relatively high EL ultimately results in low thermal efficiency. Although case 02 exhibits similar levels of HTL and EL to case 03, its severe CL prevents it from achieving high thermal efficiency. In case 03, HTL and EL are 10.51% and 37.31%, respectively. Although the HTL and EL in case 02 are comparable to those in case 03, the significantly higher CL ultimately leads to a lower overall thermal efficiency. In case 03, the HTL and EL are 10.51% and 37.31%, respectively.

3.3. Emission Characteristics

Figure 10 presents the NOx and CO emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. As shown in Figure 10a, engine NOx emissions exhibit a decreasing trend with the retardation of diesel injection timing. Elevating the intake pressure, lowering the intake temperature, and increasing the EGR rate are all conducive to achieving lower NOx emissions. At a given diesel injection timing, NOx emissions increase significantly when IVCT is delayed to a certain extent (−60° CA ATDC). Notably, a diesel injection quantity of 2 mg effectively reduces NOx emissions compared to 8 mg; however, variations in the diesel injection pressure have a minimal effect on NOx emissions. Cases 01 and 02 exhibit higher NOx emissions, whereas under the constraints of engine PCP ≤ (30 ± 1) MPa, and RI ≤ (5 ± 0.5) MW/m2, the optimized thermal efficiency case 03 achieves a NOx emission of 1.0 g/kW∙h.
As shown in Figure 10b, engine CO emissions increase significantly with the retardation of diesel injection timing. Elevating the intake pressure, increasing the EGR rate, and delaying IVCT all contribute to higher CO emissions. Conversely, increasing the intake temperature and diesel injection pressure are both effective in reducing CO emissions. It is also noteworthy that, even when the diesel injection quality is relatively low, a lower CO emission level can still be achieved by adjusting the diesel injection timing. This is because reducing the diesel injection quantity increases the amount of premixed natural gas in the cylinder, thereby increasing the mixture equivalence ratio and enhancing the activity of the mixture. At the same time, it allows for advancing diesel injection timing, which promotes more complete combustion and consequently reduces CO emissions. Case 02 exhibits a significant deterioration in CO emissions, which is consistent with its high CL. In the thermal efficiency optimization case 03, CO emissions are reduced to 0.2 g/kW∙h.
Figure 11 presents the UHC and CH4 emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion. The data indicate that CH4 constitutes the primary component of UHC emissions, suggesting a strong correlation between the emission characteristics of UHC and CH4. Both UHC and CH4 emissions increase as diesel injection timing is retarded. Advancing diesel injection timing, increasing the intake pressure, reducing the EGR rate, and elevating the diesel injection pressure are all effective strategies for minimizing UHC and CH4 emissions. It is noteworthy that, adjusting the diesel injection timing at low diesel injection quantities enables the achievement of low UHC and CH4 emissions, as demonstrated in case 03. In contrast, case 02 exhibits significantly increased UHC and CH4 emissions. This deterioration aligns with its high CL. Meanwhile, in case 01, UHC and CH4 emissions remain at relatively low levels.

3.4. Equivalence Ratio and Temperature Distribution Characteristic

This section provides a comprehensive explanation and analysis of the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio and temperature distribution for case 01, 02, and 03. The objective is to identify the combustion characteristics of TAC-HCCI that enable high thermal efficiency and low emissions, and to ultimately define the core technologies and combustion control strategies for implementing TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 12 presents the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio and temperature contour plots for case 01. The black arrow lines in the figure indicate the streamline distribution within the cylinder, the same as Figure 13, and 14. At 2° CA ATDC, 8 mg of pilot diesel fuel is injected into a homogeneous natural gas mixture with an equivalence ratio of 0.53. Shortly after injection, at 4° CA ATDC, ignition initiates primarily at the periphery of the diesel spray. The micro-pilot diesel injected near top dead center undergoes predominantly diffusion combustion, resulting in localized regions with temperatures exceeding 2600 K after combustion. Subsequently, the homogeneous natural gas mixture adjacent to the diesel spray undergoes rapid combustion and releases heat. However, as the piston descends, in-cylinder temperatures decrease, leading to a reduction in the chemical activity of the premixed natural gas mixture. Consequently, a portion of the natural gas remains unburned even at 25° CA ATDC.
Figure 13 presents the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio and temperature evolution for case 02. At −11° CA ATDC, 8 mg of pilot diesel fuel is injected into a homogeneous natural gas mixture with an equivalence ratio of 0.58. Diesel ignition initiates at −7° CA ATDC. In case 02, the diesel ignition delay is longer compared to case 01, primarily due to the delayed IVCT and the application of EGR, both of which result in a lower in-cylinder temperature prior to ignition. The diesel spray penetration distance in case 02 is shorter than in case 01, mainly because of the higher in-cylinder charge density in case 02. Consequently, with the same pilot diesel quantity, the area (volume) of the local high-temperature region (exceeding 2600 K) formed in case 02 is smaller than that in case 01. Observation of the combustion temperature of the in-cylinder homogeneous natural gas mixture indicates that the combustion temperature in case 01 is higher than in case 02. A greater proportion of the mixture exceeds 2200 K in case 01, leading to higher NOx emissions. The higher NOx emissions in case 01 compared to case 02 can be attributed to two factors: the larger high-temperature zone generated by diesel combustion in case 01, and the greater amount of homogeneous natural gas burned above 2200 K. However, due to lower combustion temperatures in case 02 compared to case 01, a larger quantity of unburned natural gas mixture remains at 20° CA ATDC. As the piston descends and in-cylinder temperatures continue to decrease, case 02 produces significant amounts of UHC and CO, ultimately resulting in increased CL.
Figure 14 presents the combustion process in the cylinder under the thermal efficiency optimization case 03. At −11° CA ATDC, 2 mg of micro-pilot diesel is injected into a homogeneous natural gas mixture with an equivalence ratio of 0.42. Ignition occurs in the cylinder at −10° CA ATDC. Compared to cases 01 and 02, case 03 exhibits the shortest diesel ignition delay, primarily due to the higher diesel injection pressure. At −9° CA ATDC, the temperature within the diesel spray region exceeds 2600 K; the area (volume) of the high-temperature zone (over 2600 K) is significantly smaller than that observed in case 01 and 02. This is mainly attributed to the reduced quantity of pilot diesel injected. As the diesel burns and releases heat, the adjacent natural gas mixture undergoes rapid combustion and heat release. Due to the low equivalence ratio of the natural gas mixture, its post-combustion temperature is below 2200 K. Simultaneously, the high-temperature region formed by diesel combustion rapidly diminishes, and by −3° CA ATDC, there is essentially no region with a temperature exceeding 2200 K remaining in the cylinder. These characteristics contribute to significantly lower NOx emissions in case 03 compared to cases 01 and 02. Although the equivalence ratio of the natural gas mixture is lowest in case 03, combustion is nearly complete by 20° CA ATDC.
In summary, the addition of pilot diesel in diesel/natural gas dual-fuel TAC-HCCI combustion effectively controls the combustion phase, ensuring the efficient and stable combustion of the mixture in the cylinder. Within the TAC-HCCI combustion framework, two key combustion requirements must be met: first, complete and thorough combustion of the mixture, and second, maintaining the lowest possible combustion temperature to minimize CL and HTL. Although diesel/natural gas dual-fuel TAC-HCCI combustion is primarily governed by the activity of the natural gas mixture, a high diesel injection pressure and low diesel injection quantity are effective in achieving low NOx emissions.
In this study, under high engine load conditions (IMEPg 24 bar), with PCP ≤ (30 ± 1) MPa, RI ≤ (5 ± 0.5) MW/m2, and without employing late IVCT and EGR, an intake temperature of 50 °C, a mixture equivalence ratio at 0.42, a diesel injection quantity of 2 mg, and a diesel injection pressure 0f 1600 bar were applied. These settings enabled the engine to achieve an ITEg of up to 52.0%, with NOx emissions of 1.0 g/kW∙h, UHC emissions of 0.1 g/kW∙h, and CO emissions of 0.2 g/kW∙h. This combustion strategy successfully addresses the load expansion limitations of conventional HCCI combustion while preserving its advantages of high efficiency and low emissions.

4. Conclusions

This study investigates the effects of the intake pressure, intake temperature, EGR rate, IVCT, diesel injection pressure, diesel injection quantity, and diesel injection timing on engine combustion conditions, energy distribution, and emissions under TAC-HCCI combustion. The optimal operating parameters for achieving high thermal efficiency and low emissions are identified. A TAC-HCCI combustion strategy is developed to enable high-efficiency and low-emission operation in diesel/natural gas dual-fuel engines. By analyzing the in-cylinder mixture equivalence ratio and temperature distribution, the key mechanisms governing TAC-HCCI combustion control are elucidated. The main conclusions are summarized as follows:
(1).
In diesel/natural gas dual-fuel TAC-HCCI combustion, the introduction of pilot diesel effectively controls the combustion phase, thereby promoting stable and efficient combustion. For TAC-HCCI combustion, two key requirements must be fulfilled: first, complete combustion of the mixture must be ensured; second, the combustion temperature should be maintained at the lowest possible level to minimize CL and HTL. The research findings demonstrate that under high-load operating conditions, a natural gas mixture with an equivalence ratio of 0.42 is conducive to achieving both complete combustion and reduced HTL, ultimately contributing to enhanced engine thermal efficiency.
(2).
The activity of the natural gas mixture primarily controls diesel/natural gas dual-fuel TAC-HCCI combustion. However, a reduced diesel injection quantity, combined with elevated injection pressure, is effective in achieving low NOx emissions. Under high engine load conditions, with a pilot diesel quantity of 2 mg and a diesel injection pressure of 1600 bar, NOx emissions can be minimized to 1.0 g/kW∙h.
(3).
By utilizing TAC-HCCI combustion under the conditions of engine PCP ≤ (30 ± 1) MPa and RI ≤ (5 ± 0.5) MW/m2, an IMEPg of 24.0 bar is achieved, with the ITEg reaching up to 52.0%. Additionally, ISNOx emissions are 1.0 g/kW∙h, ISUHC emissions are 0.1 g/kW∙h, and ISCO emissions are 0.2 g/kW∙h. This combustion strategy not only resolves the load expansion limitations associated with conventional HCCI combustion but also preserves its advantages of high efficiency and low emissions.
(4).
Under high-load conditions (IMEPg = 24.0 bar), the application of TAC-HCCI combustion without constraints on engine PCP and RI enables an ITEg of 52.2% to be achieved. Compared to the thermal efficiency obtained under the conditions of engine PCP ≤ (30 ± 1) MPa and RI ≤ (5 ± 0.5) MW/m2, this represents an increase of only 0.2%. Therefore, the further elevation of the PCP under these operating conditions offers limited potential for enhancing engine thermal efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z., and W.S.; methodology, M.Z., W.G., and Z.J.; software, M.Z.; validation, M.Z., W.G., Z.J.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, M.Z., W.G.; resources, W.S.; data curation, Z.J.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.S.; visualization, Z.J.; supervision, W.S.; project administration, W.S.; funding acquisition, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0102800), by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin through its project funding No. 19JCYBJC21200, and by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant No. 2018 M631737.

Data Availability Statement

Where no new data were created, and where data is unavailable due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

HCCIHomogenous Charge Compression Ignition
TAC-HCCIThermodynamic Activity Controlled-HCCI
EGRexhaust gas recirculation
PCPpeak cylinder pressure
RIRinging intensity
IMEPggross indicated mean effective pressure
ITEggross indicated thermal efficiency
ISNOxIndicated specific NOx emissions
CO2carbon dioxide
PPRpressure rise rates
CRcompression ratio
UHCunburned hydrocarbon
RCCIReactivity Controlled Compression Ignition
ATDCafter the top dead center
PPRRpeak pressure rise rate
ECUelectronic control unit
CFDcomputational fluid dynamics
CAcrank angle
IVCTIntake valve closing timing
CA10Combustion Phasing Defined by the Crank Angle of 10% Accumulative Heat Release
CA50Combustion Phasing Defined by the Crank Angle of 50% Accumulative Heat Release
CA90Combustion Phasing Defined by the Crank Angle of 90% Accumulative Heat Release
CLCombustion loss
HTLheat transfer loss
ELexhaust loss

References

  1. Fasching, P.; Sprenger, F.; Eichlseder, H. Experimental Optimization of a Small Bore Natural Gas-Diesel Dual Fuel Engine with Direct Fuel Injection. SAE Int. J. Engines 2016, 9, 1072–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, H.; Su, W. Numerical Study on a High Efffciency Gasoline Reformed Molecule HCCI Combustion Using Exergy Analysis. In SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0735; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Papagiannakis, R.; Kotsiopoulos, P.; Zannis, T.; Yfantis, E.; Hountalas, D.; Rakopoulos, C. Theoretical study of the effects of engine parameters on performance and emissions of a pilot ignited natural gas diesel engine. Energy 2010, 35, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, L.; Geng, P. A review on natural gas/diesel dual fuel combustion, emissions and performance. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 142, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.I.; Yasmin, T.; Shakoor, A. Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Algayyim, S.J.M.; Saleh, K.; Wandel, A.P.; Fattah, I.M.R.; Yusaf, T.; Alrazen, H.A. Influence of natural gas and hydrogen properties on internal combustion engine performance, combustion, and emissions: A review. Fuel 2024, 362, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Verma, S.K.; Gaur, S.; Akram, T.; Gautam, S.; Kumar, A. Emissions from homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine using different fuels: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 50960–50969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Verma, S.K.; Gaur, S.; Akram, T.; Samsher; Kumar, A. Performance characteristic of HCCI engine for different fuels. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 6030–6034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Z.S.; Du, G.Z.; Li, Z.J.; Wang, X.; Wang, D. Study on the combustion characteristics of a high compression ratio HCCI engine fueled with natural gas. Fuel 2019, 29, 50960–50969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Duan, X.; Lai, M.C.; Jansons, M.; Guo, G.; Liu, J. A review of controlling strategies of the ignition timing and combustion phase in homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine. Fuel 2021, 285, 119142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pourfallah, M.; Armin, M. An experimental and numerical study of the effects of reformer gas (H_2 and CO) enrichment on the natural gas homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 55, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Christensen, M.; Johansson, B.; Amnéus, P.; Mauss, F. Supercharged Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition. SAE Int. J. Engines 1998, 107, 1129–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Christensen, M.; Johansson, B. Supercharged Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) with Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Pilot Fuel. SAE Int. J. Engines 2000, 1, 1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ezoji, H.; Shafaghat, R.; Jahanian, O. Numerical simulation of dimethyl ether/natural gas blend fuel HCCI combustion to investigate the effects of operational parameters on combustion and emissions. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 135, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nobakht, A.Y.; Saray, R.K.; Rahimi, A. A parametric study on natural gas fueled HCCI combustion engine using a multi-zone combustion model. Fuel 2011, 90, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kokjohn, S.L.; Hanson, R.M.; Splitter, D.A.; Reitz, R.D. Experiments and Modeling of Dual-Fuel HCCI and PCCI Combustion Using In-Cylinder Fuel Blending. SAE Int. J. Engines 2009, 2, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paykani, A.; Kakaee, A.-H.; Rahnama, P.; Reitz, R.D. Progress and recent trends in reactivity-controlled compression ignition engines. Int. J. Engine Res. 2016, 17, 481–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reitz, R.D.; Duraisamy, G. Review of high efficiency and clean reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) combustion in internal combustion engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2015, 46, 12–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kakaee, A.H.; Rahnama, P.; Paykani, A. Influence of fuel composition on combustion and emissions characteristics of natural gas/diesel RCCI engine. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 25, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rahnama, P.; Paykani, A.; Reitz, R.D. A numerical study of the effects of using hydrogen, reformer gas and nitrogen on combustion, emissions and load limits of a heavy duty natural gas/diesel RCCI engine. Appl. Energy 2017, 193, 182–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ji, Q.; Sun, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, H. Effects of split injection strategy on combustion stability and GHG emissions characteristics of natural gas/diesel RCCI engine under high load. Energy 2022, 266, 126542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salahi, M.M.; Esfahanian, V.; Gharehghani, A.; Mirsalim, M. Investigating the reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) combustion strategy in a natural gas/diesel fueled engine with a pre-chamber. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 132, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fırat, M.; Okcu, M.; Altun, S.; Varol, Y. Numerical investigation of natural gas (NG) as low reactivity fuel in a reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engine model. Fuel 2023, 343, 127949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nieman, D.E.; Dempsey, A.B.; Reitz, R.D. Heavy-Duty RCCI Operation Using Natural Gas and Diesel. SAE Int. J. Engines 2012, 5, 270–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Walker, N.R.; Wissink, M.L.; DelVescovo, D.A.; Reitz, R.D. Natural Gas for High Load Dual-Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition in Heavy-Duty Engines. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015, 137, 042202.1–042202.7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hanson, R.; Ickes, A.; Wallner, T. Use of Adaptive Injection Strategies to Increase the Full Load Limit of RCCI Operation. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2016, 138, 102802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Milojevi, S.; Savi, S.R.; Mari, D.; Stopka, O.; Krstić, B.; Stojanović, B. Correlation between Emission and Combustion Characteristics with the Compression Ratio and Fuel Injection Timing in Tribologically Optimized Diesel Engine. Teh. Vjesn. 2022, 29, 1209–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, M.; Su, W.H.; Jia, Z. Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel-Natural gas Engine at Low Loads with Concentration and Temperature Stratified Combustion. Energies 2024, 17, 4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eng, J.A. Characterization of Pressure Waves in HCCI Combustion. Noise 2002, 1, 2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup and engine test bench.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup and engine test bench.
Energies 18 04121 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of engine combustion chamber.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of engine combustion chamber.
Energies 18 04121 g002
Figure 3. The cylinder pressure and heat release curve of calibration cases under TAC-HCCI combustion case01: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 5.5 bar, Pin = 1.0 bar, EGR = 0%; case02: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.3 bar, EGR = 20%; case03: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.0 bar, EGR = 15%, IVCTon εe = 10.1.
Figure 3. The cylinder pressure and heat release curve of calibration cases under TAC-HCCI combustion case01: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 5.5 bar, Pin = 1.0 bar, EGR = 0%; case02: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.3 bar, EGR = 20%; case03: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.0 bar, EGR = 15%, IVCTon εe = 10.1.
Energies 18 04121 g003
Figure 4. Calibration of emissions characteristics of TAC-HCCI combustion case01: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 5.5 bar, Pin = 1.0 bar, EGR = 0%; case02: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.3 bar, EGR = 20%; case03: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.0 bar, EGR = 15%, IVCTon εe = 10.1.
Figure 4. Calibration of emissions characteristics of TAC-HCCI combustion case01: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 5.5 bar, Pin = 1.0 bar, EGR = 0%; case02: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.3 bar, EGR = 20%; case03: speed = 1300 r/min, IMEPg = 18.0 bar, Pin = 3.0 bar, EGR = 15%, IVCTon εe = 10.1.
Energies 18 04121 g004
Figure 5. Peak of cylinder pressure and ringing intensity of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 5. Peak of cylinder pressure and ringing intensity of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g005
Figure 6. Combustion phase of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 6. Combustion phase of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g006
Figure 7. Combustion duration of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 7. Combustion duration of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g007
Figure 8. Indicated thermal efficiency and combustion loss of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 8. Indicated thermal efficiency and combustion loss of engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g008
Figure 9. Heat transfer loss and exhaust loss under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 9. Heat transfer loss and exhaust loss under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g009
Figure 10. NOx and CO emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 10. NOx and CO emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g010
Figure 11. UHC and CH4 emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Figure 11. UHC and CH4 emissions of the engine under TAC-HCCI combustion.
Energies 18 04121 g011
Figure 12. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 01.
Figure 12. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 01.
Energies 18 04121 g012
Figure 13. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 02.
Figure 13. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 02.
Energies 18 04121 g013
Figure 14. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 03.
Figure 14. The equivalence ratio and temperature distributions of mixture at case 03.
Energies 18 04121 g014
Table 1. Engine specifications.
Table 1. Engine specifications.
ParametersValues
Base engineWP12
Cylinder arrangementI6
Bore/Stroke126/155 mm
Connecting rod length253 mm
Displacement11.596 L
Compression ratio17:1
Inlet valve close timing−146 °CA ATDC
Exhaust valve open timing131 °CA ATDC
Rated Power (KW/rpm)353 KW/2100 rpm
Max Torque (Nm/rpm)1970 N · m/1200~1500 rpm
Maximum explosion pressure limit 20 MPa
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Gu, W.; Jia, Z.; Su, W. Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion. Energies 2025, 18, 4121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154121

AMA Style

Zhang M, Gu W, Jia Z, Su W. Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion. Energies. 2025; 18(15):4121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Min, Wenyu Gu, Zhi Jia, and Wanhua Su. 2025. "Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion" Energies 18, no. 15: 4121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154121

APA Style

Zhang, M., Gu, W., Jia, Z., & Su, W. (2025). Study of Efficient and Clean Combustion of Diesel–Natural Gas Engine at High Loads with TAC-HCCI Combustion. Energies, 18(15), 4121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop