Next Article in Journal
Innovative Application of the Ritz Method to Oil-Gas Seepage Problems: A Novel Variational Approach for Solving Underground Flow Equations
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Electricity Consumption-Associated Costs in a Medium-Sized Logistics Company
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Sensitivity Analysis of Hydraulic–Mechanical–Electrical Parameters for Hydropower System Transient Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Effect of Blade Profile on Flow Characteristics and Efficiency of Cross-Flow Turbines

by
Ephrem Yohannes Assefa
1,2 and
Asfafaw Haileselassie Tesfay
1,2,3,*
1
School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ethiopian Institute of Technology, Mekelle, Mekelle University, Mekelle P.O. Box 231, Ethiopia
2
Institute of Energy, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231, Ethiopia
3
Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(12), 3203; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123203
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 2 June 2025 / Accepted: 14 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimization Design and Simulation Analysis of Hydraulic Turbine)

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation into the influence of blade profile geometry on the internal flow dynamics and hydraulic performance of Cross-Flow Turbines (CFTs) under varying runner speeds. Four blade configurations, flat, round, sharp, and aerodynamic, were systematically evaluated using steady-state, two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The Shear Stress Transport (SST) k–ω turbulence model was employed to resolve the flow separation, recirculation, and turbulence across both energy conversion stages of the turbine. The simulations were performed across runner speeds ranging from 270 to 940 rpm under a constant head of 10 m. The performance metrics, including the torque, hydraulic efficiency, water volume fraction, pressure distribution, and velocity field characteristics, were analyzed in detail. The aerodynamic blade consistently outperformed the other geometries, achieving a peak efficiency of 83.5% at 800 rpm, with improved flow attachment, reduced vortex shedding, and lower exit pressure. Sharp blades also demonstrated competitive efficiency within a narrower optimal speed range. In contrast, the flat and round blades exhibited higher turbulence and recirculation, particularly at off-optimal speeds. The results underscore the pivotal role of blade edge geometry in enhancing energy recovery, suppressing flow instabilities, and optimizing the stage-wise performance in CFTs. These findings offer valuable insights for the design of high-efficiency, site-adapted turbines suitable for micro-hydropower applications.
Keywords: cross-flow turbine; blade profile; hydraulic efficiency; internal flow; CFD and micro-hydropower cross-flow turbine; blade profile; hydraulic efficiency; internal flow; CFD and micro-hydropower

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Assefa, E.Y.; Tesfay, A.H. Effect of Blade Profile on Flow Characteristics and Efficiency of Cross-Flow Turbines. Energies 2025, 18, 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123203

AMA Style

Assefa EY, Tesfay AH. Effect of Blade Profile on Flow Characteristics and Efficiency of Cross-Flow Turbines. Energies. 2025; 18(12):3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Assefa, Ephrem Yohannes, and Asfafaw Haileselassie Tesfay. 2025. "Effect of Blade Profile on Flow Characteristics and Efficiency of Cross-Flow Turbines" Energies 18, no. 12: 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123203

APA Style

Assefa, E. Y., & Tesfay, A. H. (2025). Effect of Blade Profile on Flow Characteristics and Efficiency of Cross-Flow Turbines. Energies, 18(12), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop