Next Article in Journal
An Overview of Recent AI Applications in Combined Heat and Power Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Resilient Distribution System Reconfiguration Based on Genetic Algorithms Considering Load Margin and Contingencies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applying Structure Exchange to Battery Charging to Enhance Light-Load Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

GaN Power Transistors in Converter Design Techniques

by
Piotr J. Chrzan
1,* and
Pawel B. Derkacz
2
1
Faculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Arex—(WB Group), Hutnicza 3, 81-212 Gdynia, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(11), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112890 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 April 2025 / Revised: 16 May 2025 / Accepted: 27 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering: 4th Edition)

Abstract

:
The expected outstanding performance of GaN-based transistors in power applications, characterized by high switching frequency, efficiency, and compactness, requires that the design rules of converter layout optimization, filtering, and shielding need to be reexamined. Addressing the above topics, this paper reviews commercial GaN power transistors and specifies their integration techniques, including printed circuit board (PCB) embedded solutions. Then, referring to the optimization results of a half-bridge inverter leg, design techniques are presented that reduce the harmful effect of inductive and capacitive internal converter couplings, thus mitigating the electromagnetic interference (EMI) conducted emissions.

1. Introduction

Gallium nitride (GaN) based power devices are becoming a competitive technology to design power electronic converters operating at higher frequencies, and revealing higher efficiency and compactness. In view of increasing requirements for high-efficiency energy conversion, two wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductor types can be distinguished: GaN and silicon carbide (SiC), regarded as silicon (Si) successors. Their advantageous properties can be derived from the comparative physical data depicted as the pentagon diagram in Figure 1 [1,2].
What is remarkable in the diagram, very high values of critical electric field Ec > 3 MV/cm and energy bandgap Eg > 3 eV, can be observed for GaN material, which makes designing power devices for specific voltage breakdown and operation at higher temperatures easier using this material than Si. Moreover, high values of electron mobility µn reaching 1500 cm2/Vs and electron saturation velocity vsat ≈ 24 cm/µs [2] reduce the die size, decreasing, as a consequence, terminal capacitances, providing the lower switching loss and the lower on-resistance, related with the lower on-state loss [3]. To evaluate materials potential impact on device operation quality, several figures of merit (FOMs) have been developed in [4,5]. Based on the data derived from [1], the selected FOMs have been recalculated and normalized using the Si data set in Table 1.
where HMFOM indicates a total conduction and switching loss reduction potential
H M F O M = E c μ n
HCAFOM depicts a die size reduction potential, and
H C A F O M = ε E c 2 μ n
HTFOM represents a thermal performance corresponding to junction temperature rise
H T F O M = σ t h ε E c
Based on the analytical assessment in Table 1, the greatest reductions in total power loss and die size can be achieved with GaN semiconductors, enabling mass and volume reduction in GaN-based power converters. However, their thermal performance is significantly worse, suggesting the need to design high-efficiency converter topologies.
The GaN and SiC based devices also expand the power region and operation frequency of Si MOSFETs, IGBTs, and Superjunction Si MOSFETs, as shown in Figure 2 [2]. In 2023, the market size of global GaN power devices was around USD 271 million, and it is projected to grow to USD 4.376 billion by 2030 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 49% [6]. Based on the Infineon 2025 predictions [7], more and more applications for power conversion are expected after deploying GaN-based devices in the voltage range of up to 700 V and beyond. The EU’s mandate for USB-C chargers, adapters, home appliances, and incentives for renewable energy technologies, including residential solar and energy, along with the demand for high-efficiency on-board chargers for hybrid and electric vehicles, allow us to expect the imminent development of GaN-based converters.
In recent years, many review papers have summarized various aspects of GaN power devices, including reliability issues [8,9,10], technologies increasing the threshold voltage [11], advances of vertical structures [12,13,14,15], along with presenting general and application-oriented overviews [2,3,16,17,18]. However, the fast-switching operation of GaNs in power converters results in high voltage dv/dt and current di/dt derivatives, which increase EMI perturbations and switching power loss. To mitigate these harmful switching effects, various design issues and precautions have been elaborated.
To reduce EMI at source, active gate drivers were developed [19] to adapt voltage derivatives to load conditions, optimizing the trade-off between high-frequency operation and switching power loss. However, some solutions [20] rely on complex system-on-chip (SoC) hardware with analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion for transistor current measurement.
An alternative methodology involves using EMI filters, designing snubber circuits [21,22], or employing other damping techniques through inductively coupled circuits with optimized damping resistances [23,24]. For effective suppression of commutation ringing, these solutions require precise wide-band converter parameter identification, which is challenging due to load changes or aging phenomena.
Additionally, to limit switching power loss, soft switching converter topologies have been developed, albeit at the expense of increased controller complexity and additional auxiliary elements [18,25,26].
Another design objective reexamined in this paper is the minimization of parasitic elements that primarily impact EMI issues, achieved by focusing on converter construction, printed circuit board (PCB) layout optimization, and shielding techniques. Addressing the above topics, this paper reviews commercial GaN power transistors and specifies their integration techniques, including printed circuit board (PCB) embedded solutions [27,28,29]. Then, referring to the results obtained in [30], case study design techniques for a half-bridge inverter leg are presented, which reduce the harmful effect of inductive and capacitive internal converter couplings, thus mitigating the EMI conducted emissions.

2. Classification of GaN Power Devices

Owing to low technological maturity and high cost of native GaN substrates, the majority of current commercial GaN devices are lateral and are epitaxially deposited on a wafer of Al2O3 (sapphire), SiC, or Si [31]. The basic lateral structure incorporates a layer of AlGaN on top of the GaN, creating a heterojunction between these two layers. The positive net charge at the AlGaN/GaN junction due to the polarization effect attracts free electrons from the material to achieve charge neutrality. The accumulation of a large number of free electrons in the junction forms a high mobility, high density electron channel, known as a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) [3,17,32]. The device is specified as a high electron mobility transistor (HEMT). Due to the native 2DEG channel, it is a depletion-mode normally on HEMT with a negative threshold voltage. To attain normally off operation, preferred for security in power applications, two commercially developed techniques of enhancement mode (e-mode) and hybrid transistors are widely exploited [3].

2.1. E-Mode GaN HEMTs

The efficient techniques for e-mode GaN HEMTs have been developed by modifying the gate region to shift the threshold voltage to a positive value, VGS(th) > 0. In the p-GaN gate transistor, a p-doped layer is deposited under the gate terminal to obtain a fixed negative charge at the junction with the AlGaN layer. At the zero gate voltage, VGS, this negative charge depletes the 2DEG under the gate terminal, and the drain current ID cannot flow, as is depicted in Figure 3. The positive voltage VGS > VGS(th)) enhances the 2DEG and completes the channel.
The metal gate of the p-GaN HEMT forms the ohmic or Schottky contact with the p-GaN layer [11]. The gate structure with ohmic contact of the gate injection transistor (GIT) contains the p-AlGaN layer over the undoped AlGaN/GaN heterojunction. The increase in the gate voltage over the built-in voltage of the p-n junction results in the hole injection to the channel from the p-AlGaN layer, causing the constant gate source leakage current IGSS of several milliamps to flow into the gate at steady-state. This intentional injection of minority carriers enhances the conductivity of the 2DEG, reducing, as a consequence, the on-state resistance Rds(on). However, to achieve fast switching transients and low Rds(on), dedicated gate drivers are recommended.
In order to reduce IGSS and increase the gate forward voltage, a reverse-bias Schottky contact is formed in the structure of the p-GaN gate transistor, also known as the Schottky gate transistor. The operation of the p-GaN gate transistor is similar to that of the GIT transistor. However, by applying a positive gate-source voltage, the Schottky diode is reverse-biased and conducts a small leakage gate current. Therefore, gate control is compatible with most of the drivers for silicon MOSFETs, and such a structure is mostly used for commercially available e-mode GaN HEMT devices [3].
Typical parameters of the selected commercially available e-mode GaN HEMTs of the 650 V/60 A power series are gathered in Table 2. Their common feature is that the VDS rating is limited to 650 V. However, finite engineering samples are offered with the breakdown drain-source voltage shifted to 1200 V [33]. Other e-mode GaNs’ features are as below:
  • Ultra-fast switching;
  • Zero reverse-recovery charge QRR;
  • Low gate charge QG and output charge QOSS;
  • Reverse conduction capability;
  • Strong on-resistance temperature dependence.

2.2. Hybrid Transistors

The hybrid transistor topologies shown in Figure 4 represent alternative methods to ensure safe switching of depletion-mode GaN HEMTs in power converters.
The cascode hybrid transistor consists of the d-mode GaN HEMT connected in series with the low-voltage normally off Si MOSFET, where the gate terminal of the HEMT transistor is connected to the source terminal of the MOSFET. When the MOSFET is turned on, its VDS tends to zero, turning on the HEMT. Similarly, during the MOSFET turn-off process, its VDS voltage increases, which turns the HEMT off. Thus, the cascode hybrid transistor operates in a way similar to the Si MOSFET with positive VGS(th). In the on-state, both transistors conduct the same current, while in the off-state, the GaN HEMT blocks the major part (>90%) of the drain voltage. Therefore, it is possible to use a low-voltage Si MOSFET possessing low RDS(on) and high switching time [34]. What is noteworthy, this configuration does not need connecting the source to the substrate for potential augmentation of voltage breakdown up to 1200 V [35].
The parameters of the selected, commercially available cascode GaN HEMTs are gathered in Table 3. Typical features are summarized as below:
  • VGS(th) set by the Si MOSFET independent of the d-mode GaN HEMT;
  • Standard-level MOSFET drivers can be used;
  • High immunity to drain voltage gradients dv/dt;
  • Enhanced inrush current capability;
  • Low gate charge QG and output charge QOSS;
  • Reverse conduction capability;
  • Very low reverse-recovery charge QRR.
In the direct drive configuration, both transistors are connected in series. Here, the d-mode GaN HEMT is controlled directly from the gate driver. Since the Si MOSFET is always on, its body diode does not turn on due to low RDS(on). As a result, there are no Qrr-related power losses in the direct-drive configuration. Moreover, during normal operation, fast switching capabilities of the d-mode GaN HEMT can be fully exploited, including slew rate control by using the gate current. In the case of a power supply fault, when the driver cannot turn off the GaN HEMT, the under-voltage lockout (UVLO) protection turns off the Si MOSFET to anticipate a short circuit in the converter [36]. The parameters of the selected commercially available hybrid transistors are enclosed in Table 3.

2.3. Bidirectional GaN Transistors

The lateral structure of GaN HEMTs enables monolithic integration of two transistors to form a bidirectional switch on a single chip possessing two gates and two sources with a shared drain region. The main objective of bidirectional switches required for power electronics applications is a four-quadrant operation for bidirectional current conduction in the on-state, and bipolar voltage blocking in the off-state [37]. In such a device, parasitic inductances are minimized, and the common low-resistive drift channel length is similar to that of a single GaN HEMT.
Navitas Semiconductor Ltd. offers a commercially available normally off dual gate bidirectional switch, NV6428 [38]. Assuming different potentials S1 and S2 of the source terminals, this switch requires two floating gate (isolated gate) driver channels. As a four-quadrant switch, it is capable of blocking the voltage in either or both directions, and conducting the current in either or both directions, depending on the states of G1 and G2, as in Figure 5.
To assure bipolar voltage blocking with simultaneous unidirectional current conduction, the single gate control is sufficient. In this case, the other gate can be connected with the low-voltage silicon Schottky diode using a cascode configuration [39]. Alternatively, in the single-gate bidirectional GaN HEMT (produced, e.g., by Innoscience (Suzhou, China), Nexperia (Nijmegen, The Netherlands)), the transistor channel, due to its symmetry, has two terminals that can be assigned to the drain or to the source. However, to block the reverse current, the voltage across the transistor cannot exceed the threshold for conduction in the reverse direction. This might involve additional circuit design considerations, making use, for instance, of external diodes or other components to prevent the reverse current flow [40]. Selected data of bi-directional GaN HEMTs are put in Table 4.

2.4. Vertical GaN Transistors

Vertical GaN power transistors have an internal structure similar to their Si and SiC counterparts, where the current flows from the drain to the source across a vertical drift layer. Vertical GaN devices, with a thicker drift layer, feature a higher breakdown voltage, current capability, and heat dissipation for a given chip area, compared to the thin channel layer of lateral HEMTs. Several types of vertical GaN devices have already been developed in laboratory conditions [13]. These include Schottky barrier diodes [12] and p-i-n GaN-on-Silicon diodes [41]. The primary transistor types include the current aperture vertical electron transistors (CAVET) and the vertical GaN MOSFETs [14]. The industrial fabrication of vertical GaN devices is expected in near future.

3. GaN Integration Techniques

Fast switching capability of high voltage GaN transistors creates challenging design integration solutions to minimize gate and power loop inductances, in order to mitigate harmful EMI resulting from the converter switching operation. Moreover, due to a very low threshold voltage of e-mode GaNs, the reduction of gate wire bonding improves their immunity to turn-on events during high drain-source voltage gradients.
An additional outcome of using the integrated circuits is the increased power density and efficiency. The techniques reported in the literature and commercially available integrated techniques are adapted to converter power ratings and applications.
The issue of integration is relevant in monolithically integrated single-gate driver circuits with GaN transistors on a single substrate and in co-packaged silicon gate drivers placed on the same die-attach-pad with GaNs. These integrated circuit (IC) power chips are equipped with different security functions, including overtemperature, overcurrent, and undervoltage protections [42]. More advanced structures integrate complete fundamental power stage blocks, as is the half-bridge topology [43], which consists of high- and low-side GaN switches, a level shifter for ground-referenced PWM signals, a bootstrap to drive high-side circuits, and other functions depicted in Figure 6. Its fully monolithic implementation was designed to operate as a buck converter of up to 2 MHz with input of up to 80 V and output of 10 A.
There is a continuous progress reported in design solutions of gate drivers for half-bridge integration. Challenges posed by common-mode transient immunity and negative voltage operation in level shifting during the dead time conduction are considered in [44]. Another approach is based on isolated gate drivers utilizing an on-chip coreless transformer to achieve signal-level shifting to the high side. This integrated power stage (IPS) is encapsulated with two GaN HEMTs in a small 8 × 8 mm package [45]. A few examples of Si gate drivers integrated with the single e-mode GaN or the two GaNs half-bridge IPS are gathered in Table 5.
Despite the advanced assembly of IPSs, some indispensable interconnections to external decoupling capacitors of the gate supply or the dc-link rail are needed. To limit parasitic inductances, PCB embedding with the placement of on-package decoupling capacitors is proposed [28], as in Figure 7. Another analytical treatment of the PCB-embedded GaN modules in terms of electrical and thermal performance is presented in [29].

4. Half-Bridge Implementation Case Study

The implementation case study has been focused on the example of a half-bridge inverter leg based on lateral e-mode GaN HEMTs, as in Figure 8 [30]. The inverter is supplied from a DC voltage source, Vi = 250 V, through the line impedance stabilization network LISN. Two input capacitors divide the voltage into Vi/2 to create a 0 V midpoint connection for the load. The operation frequency has been set at fs = 250 kHz. The inverter is feeding the resistive–inductive load L-Rload. Power loop inductance is represented by the bus bar inductances Ls+/Ls−. The layout of stray capacitances is marked red, including the main common mode capacitance CCM at the inverter output midpoint. To limit the CM current circulation path through the load circuit, the CM filter LCM is inserted at the inverter output. The inverter utilizes a four-layer PCB to provide a high level of integration between discrete components and PCB copper layers (planes, polygons), vias, and tracks [46]. The three tested design techniques adopting the top-side cooled e-mode GaNs are discussed below.

4.1. Power Loop and Gate Loop Inductances

The power loop inductance is a sum of the bus bar stray inductances Ls+ and Ls−, the common source inductances Ls, the equivalent series inductance ESL of the decoupling capacitor, and mutual inductances between them [47]. The power loop inductance should be minimized to limit overvoltage at the transistor turn-off transient. The gate circuit inductance Lg generates the gate-source overvoltage and should also be minimized. Due to the common source inductances of the transistors, the drain current and the gate current pass through the same conductor, generating disturbances in the gate circuit and increasing the switching energy [48]. The coupling between the drain circuit and the gate circuit is to be minimized by using short distances to the gate driver and a small loop surface of the gate circuit.

4.2. The Impact of Stray Capacitance

The gate circuit should be robust against false turn-on faults resulting from the Miller capacitance Cdg at high drain-source voltage gradients dvDS/dt. When applied to the gate, the negative voltage in the turn-off state improves the gate immunity to the Miller effect. The common mode capacitance CCM, between the switching node potential and the ground, represents a number of distributed capacitances, including the thermal pad capacitance that is enlarged by the grounded heat sink placement [49]. Since high voltage gradients, dv/dt of the switching node, generate CM currents, the design effort is to minimize CCM. Other stray capacitances: C+ and C− between the bus bars, potentials DC+ and DC−, respectively, and the ground, provide recycling of CM currents inside the switching cell, hence, they should be increased, while still remaining symmetric to avoid differential mode (DM) coupling and CM noise.

4.3. Planar 2D Layout of PCB

The planar 2D layout configuration of the PCB is illustrated in Figure 9. Two transistors are soldered at the top of the PCB. Heat dissipation is realized by a heat sink mounted directly on both devices. To reduce the power loop area, decoupling capacitors Cdecoup are placed beneath the inverter leg on the same side of the PCB. Also, the layouts of the DC+ plane (red) and the DC− plane (blue) provide a symmetrical and reduced power loop. The half-bridge isolated gate driver is mounted close to the transistor. The gate circuits consist of two branches with resistors Ron and Roff and diode Doff to separately tune the turn-on and turn-off transients. The inverter middle point track is implemented by two PCB middle layers (orange and cyan) of the same geometry, connected by vias to increase the current capability of the converter. With the aim of attenuating the CM current emission, the middle point track shielding is applied by extending the surfaces of the DC+ and DC− bus bar planes. The application of shielding results in internal recycling of CM noise at the cost of an increase in capacitances between the drain and source terminals of the switching transistors [30,50,51].

4.4. 2.5D Power Chip-on-Chip Layout of PCB

Figure 10 shows the 2.5D power chip-on-chip (PCoC) layout schematic [30,52]. Two GaN HEMTs, mounted “in mirror” on the top and bottom sides of the PCB, are connected directly to the DC+ and DC− bus bars. The inverter middle point track is arranged in the same way as previously in the inner layers of the PCB. The decoupling capacitors are placed close to the transistors, on each side of the PCB. The power loop area is smaller, since it is almost embedded inside the PCB thickness.

4.5. 3D Power Chip-on-Chip Layout of PCB

After recording the initial results of the 2D and 2.5D concepts, a full PCoC 3D layout was designed as in Figure 11. In this configuration, the decoupling capacitors were mounted vertically in dedicated holes within the multilayer PCB, positioned on the left and right sides of the transistor locations. As before, the implementation is based on a four-layer PCB with two GaN HEMTs, mounted in a “mirror” arrangement on the top and bottom sides of the PCB. This design further reduces the power loop area compared to the 2.5D layout. Additionally, due to the capacitors’ placement, the number of vias and the overall volume of the circuit assembly were minimized. However, when utilizing the 2.5D or the 3D layout techniques, heat sinks must be installed on both sides of the PCB.

4.6. Simulation Results

Table 6 compares the power loop stray inductances for the considered layout configurations, calculated with the Ansys Q3D extractor. It is evident from the data presented that the power loop inductance is the lowest for the full 3D layout. It is to be noted that the data in the table do not include internal parasitic inductances of the transistor package (in a range of 0.4 nH for each GaN HEMT).

4.7. Experimental Validation

The experimentally measured current noise spectra of the shielding boards for 3D and 2D layout configurations are compared in Figure 12. For the 3D PCoC layout, slightly better attenuation of the CM current spectral envelope is obtained in the whole frequency range. For the DM current, the noise attenuation improvement for the 3D layout is even more significant, except for the frequency range between 2 and 10 MHz, where the 2D solution is more effective.
Figure 13 illustrates the half-bridge inverter setup with a zoom on the four-layer PCB planar 2D layout of GaN HEMTs (2xGS66506T), assuring close connection to the isolated gate driver (Si827x). The decoupling capacitors (6 × 100 nF) are placed in two stacks at the bottom side of the PCB package, under the transistors. In order to minimize CM capacitive coupling of the gate driver power supply, the battery board of the batteries is mounted perpendicular to the main board.
Figure 14 depicts the oscilloscope record of the half-bridge inverter’s steady-state operation. All four consecutive conduction states (with subperiods of bidirectional current conduction of GaNs), being the result of the resistive–inductive load, are present. The zooms of voltage waveforms at turn-off transients show the significantly reduced voltage overshoots, validating the design layout with minimized power loop stray inductance.
Throughout this study on half-bridge inverter operation, the impact of reducing power loop inductance on transistor VDS voltage overshoot and switching oscillation attenuation has been demonstrated. As a result, CM noise can also be reduced. Furthermore, it has been shown that decreasing the parasitic capacitance between the inverter leg’s midpoint and the ground potential directly mitigates CM noise generation. The newly proposed shielding approach—utilizing the positive or negative bus bar planes—enables internal recycling of CM noise, leading to a total reduction of over 17 dB in CM emission at the inverter input.

5. Conclusions

Gallium nitride (GaN) based power devices are becoming a competitive technology to design power electronic converters operating at higher frequencies and revealing higher efficiencies and compactness. Owing to energy savings, the adoption of GaN power switches is particularly attractive to supply AI data centers, 5G power stations, automotive chargers, or USB-C chargers and adapters. The majority of current commercial GaN transistors are e-mode lateral structure GaN HEMT devices or d-mode GaN HEMTs in hybrid configuration with low voltage Si MOSFETs for the voltage range of up to 700 V and beyond. Due to a low-resistive channel and four-quadrant operation, the emerging bidirectional GaN transistors formed by monolithic integration of two transistors are expected to support the next generation of grid converters and traction inverters.
The increase in the GaN operation switching frequency to the MHz range means that the design of the power layout becomes a key step to build an effectively working converter. The limitation of voltage overshoots and commutation oscillations, assuring low EMI emission, requires sub-nanohenry power loop and gate loop inductances. The half-bridge implementation case study underlined the importance of packaging GaN devices with PCB embedded technologies, including power chip-on-chip 3D concepts to minimize stray inductances.
The minimization of the common mode capacitance CCM, representing a number of distributed stray capacitances between the inverter middle point track and the ground, is crucial for CM interference attenuation. However, for recycling the CM currents inside the switching cell, the stray capacitances C+ and C− between the bus bars and the ground should be increased, while still remaining symmetric to avoid coupling of DM and CM noise.
The application of local shielding techniques to the inverter middle point track, thermal pads, and gate power supplies increases the recirculation of CM currents within the converter, which leads to further reduction of CM noise. Moreover, to block the CM current circulation path through the load circuit, a CM filter LCM (integrated inductor) should be inserted between the inverter middle point track and the load circuit.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.C.; methodology, P.J.C. and P.B.D.; software, P.B.D.; validation, P.B.D.; formal analysis, P.J.C. and P.B.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.J.C. and P.B.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Jean-Luc Schanen and Pierre-Olivier Jeannin from the Grenoble Electrical Engineering Laboratory, France, and to Piotr Musznicki from the Gdansk University of Technology, Poland, for fruitful discussions on the paper topics and for providing the research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Pawel B. Derkacz was employed by the company Arex—(WB Group). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, A.Q. Power semiconductor devices for smart grid and renewable energy systems. Proc. IEEE 2019, 105, 2019–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Buffolo, M.; Favero, D.; Marcuzzi, A.; De Santi, C.; Meneghesso, G.; Meneghini, M. Review and outlook on GaN and SiC power devices: Industrial state-of-the-art, applications, and perspectives. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2024, 71, 1344–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Udabe, A.; Baraia-Etxaburu, I.; Garrido-Diez, D. Gallium nitride power devices: A state of the art review. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 48628–48650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baliga, B.J. Power semiconductors device figure of merit for high frequency applications. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 1989, 10, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, A.Q. New unipolar switching power device figures of merit. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2004, 25, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Global GaN Power Device Market Size Expecting to Reach USD 4,376 Billion in 2030, CAGR of 49%. Available online: https://www.trendforce.com/news/2024/08/16/news-global-gan-power-device-market-size-expected-to-reach-usd-4-376-billion-in-2030-cagr-of-49/ (accessed on 6 March 2025).
  7. GaN Power Semiconductors—2025 Predictions; Infineon Technologies AG: Neubiberg, Germany, 2025.
  8. Kozak, J.P.; Zhang, R.; Porter, M.; Song, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, R.; Saito, W.; Zhang, Y. Stability, reliability, and robustness of GaN power devices: A Review. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 8442–8471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Method of Lifetime Estimation of EcoGaNTM in Soft Switching Applications. ROHM Semiconductors June 2024. Available online: https://fscdn.rohm.com/en/products/databook/white_paper/discrete/gan/hemt/method_of_lifetime_estimation_of_ecogan_in_soft-switching_operations_wp-e.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  10. Zhang, R.; Kozak, J.P.; Xiao, M.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y. Surge-Energy and Overvoltage Ruggedness of P-Gate GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 13409–13419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Z.; Nan, J.; Tian, Z.; Liu, P.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J. Review on Main Gate Characteristics of P-Type GaN Gate High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. Micromachines 2024, 15, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fu, H.; Fu, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Palacios, T.; Zhao, Y. Vertical GaN Power Devices: Device Principles and Fabrication Technologies—Part I. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2021, 68, 3200–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, H.; Fu, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Palacios, T.; Zhao, Y. Vertical GaN Power Devices: Device Principles and Fabrication Technologies—Part II. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2021, 68, 3212–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Langpoklakpam, C.; Liu, A.-C.; Hsiao, Y.-K.; Lin, C.-H.; Kuo, H.-C. Vertical GaN MOSFET Power Devices. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ramanathan, D. Avalanche and short circuit robustness of vertical GaN FET. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2022, 9, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jones, E.A.; Wang, F.; Costinett, D. Review of commercial GaN power devices and GaN-based converter design challenges. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2016, 4, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iannaccone, G.; Sbrana, C.; Morelli, I.; Strangio, S. Power electronics based on wide-bandgap semiconductors: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 139446–139456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bay, O.; Tran, M.T.; El Baghdadi, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Hegazy, O. A Comprehensive Review of GaN-Based Bi-directional On-Board Charger Topologies and Modulation Methods. Energies 2023, 16, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bau, P.; Cousineau, M.; Cougo, B.; Richardeau, F.; Rouger, N. CMOS active gate driver for closed-loop dv/dt control of GaN transistors. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 13322–13332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Blank, M.; Glück, T.; Kugi, A.; Kreuter, H.P. Digital slew rate and S-shape control for smart power switches to reduce EMI generation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 5170–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yatsugi, K.; Nomura, K.; Hattori, Y. Analytical technique for designing an RC snubber circuit for ringing suppression in a phase-leg configuration. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 4736–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, X.; Xu, M.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; He, M. Analytical method for RC snubber optimization design to eliminate switching oscillations of SiC. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 4672–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.; Shin, D.; Sul, S.K. A damping scheme for switching ringing of full SiC MOSFET by air core PCB circuit. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 4605–4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, X.; Li, J.; Ding, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhu, X.-F.; Zhu, J. Observation of Transient Parity-Time Symmetry in Electronic Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 065701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, T.; Chen, C.; Xu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, Y. GaN-based megahertz single-phase inverter with a hybrid TCM control method for high efficiency and high-power density. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 4605–4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oh, H.-S.; Hong, S.-Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.-B. Comparison of Bi-Directional Topologies for On-Board Charger: A 10.9 kW High-Efficiency High Power Density of DC-DCStage. Energies 2024, 17, 5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, Z.; Yan, H.; Fan, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhang, J. A 3-D Integrated power module of GaN HEMTs based on silver sintering processes. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 2932–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moench, S.; Reiner, R.; Waltereit, P.; Benkhelifa, F.; Hückelheim, J.; Meder, D.; Zink, M.; Kaden, T.; Noll, S.; Mansfeld, S.; et al. PCB-embedded GaN-on-Si half-bridge and driver ICs with on-package gate. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qi, Z.; Pei, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, Q.; Wang, K. A highly integrated PCB embedded GaN full-bridge module with ultralow parasitic inductance. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 4161–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Derkacz, P.B. EMC-Optimized Converter Using Power GaN Devices. Ph.D. Thesis, University Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  31. Han, Z.; Li, X.; Ji, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, W.; You, S.; Li, Z.; Hao, Y.; et al. p-GaN Gate HEMTs on 6-Inch Sapphire by CMOS-Compatible Process: A Promising Game Changer for Power Electronics. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2024, 45, 1257–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kassakian, J.G.; Perreault, D.J.; Verghese, G.C.; Schlecht, M.F. Principles of Power Electronics, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2024; pp. 528–530. [Google Scholar]
  33. GPIHV30SB5L Datasheet Version 3: Preliminary. GaNPower International Inc. Available online: https://iganpower.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GPIHV30SB5L_V3.0.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2025).
  34. The Fundamental Advantages of Normally-off d-Mode GaN. Renesas Electronics. 2024. Available online: https://www.renesas.com/en/document/whp/fundamental-advantages-normally-d-mode-gan (accessed on 6 March 2025).
  35. Gupta, G.; Kanamura, M.; Swenson, B.; Bisi, D.; Romanczyk, B.; Neufeld, C.; Wienecke, S.; Ogino, T.; Miyazaki, Y.; Imanishi, K.; et al. 1200V GaN switches on sapphire substrate. In Proceedings of the IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 22–25 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
  36. Brohlin, P.L.; Ramadass, Y.K.; Kaya, C. Direct-Drive Configuration for GaN Devices. Texas Instruments Inc. 2018. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/wp/slpy008a/slpy008a.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2025).
  37. Huber, J.; Kolar, J.W. Monolithic bidirectional power transistors. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2023, 10, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. NV6428 Datasheet. Navitas Semiconductor Ltd. Available online: https://navitassemi.com/wp-content/plugins/gb-navitas-stock-checker/product_files/NV6428_70mO%20Max_Bi-Directional%20GaNFast_TOLT.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  39. Nain, N.; Walser, S.; Huber, J.; Leong, K.K.; Kolar, J.W. Self-reverse-blocking (SRB) control of dual-gate monolithic bidirectional GaN switch with quasi-ohmic on-state characteristic. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 10091–10094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Does GaN Have a Body Diode?—Understanding the Third Quadrant Operation of GaN; Application Report SNOAA3; Texas Instruments Inc.: Singapore, 2019; Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoaa36/snoaa36.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  41. Hamdaoui, Y.; Michler, S.; Bidaud, A.; Ziouche, K.; Medjdoub, F. 1200-V fully vertical GaN-on-Silicon p-i-n diodes with avalanche capability and high on-state current above 10 A. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2025, 72, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stevens, J.; Ribarich, T.; Oliver, S. Practical realization of GaN’s capability. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2022, 9, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lindow, A. Gallium nitride integration: Braking down technical barriers quickly. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2020, 7, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lai, R.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, J.; Dai, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Shi, Y.; Li, S.; Qin, Z. A Monolithic GaN power stage with common-mode transient immunity and negative voltage operation design for high-frequency power converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 8129–8145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Integrated Power Stage (IPS) IGI60F1414A1L. Infineon Technologies AG. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/power/gallium-nitride/gallium-nitride-transistor/igi60f1414a1l/?redirId=295083 (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  46. Persson, E. Optimizing PCB layout for HV GaN power transistors. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2023, 10, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Regnat, G.; Jeannin, P.-O.; Frey, D.; Ewanchuk, J.; Mollov, S.W.; Ferrieux, J.-P. Optimized Power Modules for Silicon Carbide MOSFET. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 1634–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. GN001 Application Guide. Design with GaN Enhancement Mode HEMT. GaN System Inc. 2018. Available online: https://gansystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/GN001-Design_with_GaN_EHEMT_180412.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2025).
  49. Derkacz, P.B.; Schanen, J.-L.; Jeannin, P.-O.; Musznicki, P.; Chrzan, P.J.; Petit, M. 3D PCB package for GaN inverter leg with low EMC feature. In Proceedings of the EPE’20 ECCE Europe, Lyon, France, 7–11 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  50. Derkacz, P.B.; Schanen, J.-L.; Jeannin, P.-O.; Chrzan, P.J.; Musznicki, P.; Petit, M. EMI mitigation of GaN power inverter leg by local shielding techniques. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 11996–12004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, J.; Burgos, R.; Boroyevich, D.; Stewart, J.; Xu, J. Low Impedance Multi-Conductor Layered Bus Structure with Shielding. US 2020/0373254 A1. 26 November 2020.
  52. Fita, C.; Jeannin, P.-O.; Lefrance, P.; Clavel, E.; Delaine, J. A novel 3D structure for synchronous buck converter based on nitride Gallium transistors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 18–22 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparative specification of SiC, GaN, and Si. Data based on [1,2].
Figure 1. Comparative specification of SiC, GaN, and Si. Data based on [1,2].
Energies 18 02890 g001
Figure 2. Frequency and power ratings for different semiconductor device technologies. Reproduced from [2] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Figure 2. Frequency and power ratings for different semiconductor device technologies. Reproduced from [2] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Energies 18 02890 g002
Figure 3. Cross-sectional view of a typical p-GaN gate, e-mode GaN HEMT.
Figure 3. Cross-sectional view of a typical p-GaN gate, e-mode GaN HEMT.
Energies 18 02890 g003
Figure 4. Hybrid transistors in cascode and direct drive configurations.
Figure 4. Hybrid transistors in cascode and direct drive configurations.
Energies 18 02890 g004
Figure 5. Operation modes of the dual gate bidirectional GaN HEMT switch (black—gate is off, red—gate is on); (a) voltage VS1S2 is blocked in both directions, (b,c) voltage VS1S2 is blocked in one direction and the current flows in one direction, (d) bidirectional current conduction.
Figure 5. Operation modes of the dual gate bidirectional GaN HEMT switch (black—gate is off, red—gate is on); (a) voltage VS1S2 is blocked in both directions, (b,c) voltage VS1S2 is blocked in one direction and the current flows in one direction, (d) bidirectional current conduction.
Energies 18 02890 g005
Figure 6. The integrated GaN HEMT half-bridge power stage; (a) simplified diagram of essential blocks; (b) EPC2151 monolithic implementation. Reproduced with permission from [43] (© 2020 IEEE).
Figure 6. The integrated GaN HEMT half-bridge power stage; (a) simplified diagram of essential blocks; (b) EPC2151 monolithic implementation. Reproduced with permission from [43] (© 2020 IEEE).
Energies 18 02890 g006
Figure 7. PCB-embedded half-bridge with on-package capacitors; (a) schematic of integrated circuit, (b) on-package gate-supply capacitors for low-inductive gate loop, (c) on-package dc-link high-voltage capacitors for low-inductive power loop. Reproduced from [28] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Figure 7. PCB-embedded half-bridge with on-package capacitors; (a) schematic of integrated circuit, (b) on-package gate-supply capacitors for low-inductive gate loop, (c) on-package dc-link high-voltage capacitors for low-inductive power loop. Reproduced from [28] under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Energies 18 02890 g007
Figure 8. Half-bridge inverter in the laboratory setup depicting power loop inductances Ls+/Ls− and the layout of stray capacitances.
Figure 8. Half-bridge inverter in the laboratory setup depicting power loop inductances Ls+/Ls− and the layout of stray capacitances.
Energies 18 02890 g008
Figure 9. Planar 2D layout configuration of PCB (thickness of the board in scale 10:1) [30].
Figure 9. Planar 2D layout configuration of PCB (thickness of the board in scale 10:1) [30].
Energies 18 02890 g009
Figure 10. 2.5D PCoC layout configuration of PCB [30].
Figure 10. 2.5D PCoC layout configuration of PCB [30].
Energies 18 02890 g010
Figure 11. Full 3D PCoC layout configuration of PCB [30].
Figure 11. Full 3D PCoC layout configuration of PCB [30].
Energies 18 02890 g011
Figure 12. Experimentally measured conducted emission spectra for 3D (blue) and 2D (orange) layout design with applied shielding techniques [30]; (a) CM current; and (b) DM current.
Figure 12. Experimentally measured conducted emission spectra for 3D (blue) and 2D (orange) layout design with applied shielding techniques [30]; (a) CM current; and (b) DM current.
Energies 18 02890 g012
Figure 13. View of the half-bridge inverter setup with zoom on the PCB planar 2D layout.
Figure 13. View of the half-bridge inverter setup with zoom on the PCB planar 2D layout.
Energies 18 02890 g013
Figure 14. Half-bridge inverter voltage and current waveforms. Reproduced with permission from [50] (© 2022 IEEE).
Figure 14. Half-bridge inverter voltage and current waveforms. Reproduced with permission from [50] (© 2022 IEEE).
Energies 18 02890 g014
Table 1. Comparative indicators of FOMs for semiconductor materials: Si, 4H-SiC, and GaN.
Table 1. Comparative indicators of FOMs for semiconductor materials: Si, 4H-SiC, and GaN.
MaterialHMFOMHCAFOMHTFOM
Si1.001.001.00
4H-SiC5.2631.990.47
GaN11.5696.670.12
Table 2. Parameters of selected 650 V/60 A e-mode GaN HEMTs of for Tj = 25 °C.
Table 2. Parameters of selected 650 V/60 A e-mode GaN HEMTs of for Tj = 25 °C.
DeviceManufacturerRDS(on) [mΩ]QG [nC]VGS(th) [V]IGSS [mA]Topology
IGT65R025D2Infineon25110.9–1.646GIT 1
GS0650605BAGaN Systems25141.1–2.60.32p-GaN
INN650TA030AHInnoscience26161.2–2.50.25p-GaN
1 Gate injection transistor.
Table 3. Parameters of selected hybrid GaN HEMTs of VDS = 650 V for Tj = 25 °C.
Table 3. Parameters of selected hybrid GaN HEMTs of VDS = 650 V for Tj = 25 °C.
DeviceManufacturerRDS(on) [mΩ]QG [nC]VGS(th) [V]ID/IDM [A]Topology
TP65H035G4QSRenesas3522446/240Cascode
GAN039650NBBNexperia33263.958/234Cascode
LMG3522R030Texas Inst.26--55/125Direct drive
Table 4. Selected data of bidirectional e-mode GaN HEMTs for Tj = 25 °C.
Table 4. Selected data of bidirectional e-mode GaN HEMTs for Tj = 25 °C.
DeviceManufacturerRDS(on) [mΩ]QOSS [nC]VDS [V]ID/IDM [A]Topology
NV6428Navitas5210065049/78Dual gate
INV120EQ035AInnoscience3.595120100/320Single gate
GANB4R8-040Nexperia412.24020/100Single gate
Table 5. Selected data of IPSs utilizing e-mode GaN HEMTs for Tj= 25°C.
Table 5. Selected data of IPSs utilizing e-mode GaN HEMTs for Tj= 25°C.
DeviceManufacturerRDS(on) [mΩ]dv/dt [V/ns]VDS [V]ID/IDM [A]Topology
BM3G005MUVLBROHM5015065021/68Single HEMT
NV6522Navitas4010065041/83Single HEMT
EPC2152EPC2 × 10-8015/-Half-bridge
IGI60F1414A1LInfineon2 × 1403006006/23Half-bridge
Table 6. Power loop stray inductances of the half-bridge inverter leg (simulation results).
Table 6. Power loop stray inductances of the half-bridge inverter leg (simulation results).
Layout2D2.5D3D
Stray inductance @ 1 MHz8.9 nH7.56 nH1.93 nH
Stray inductance @ 10 MHz4.83 nH4.69 nH1.49 nH
Stray inductance @ 100 MHz6.94 nH5.46 nH1.57 nH
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chrzan, P.J.; Derkacz, P.B. GaN Power Transistors in Converter Design Techniques. Energies 2025, 18, 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112890

AMA Style

Chrzan PJ, Derkacz PB. GaN Power Transistors in Converter Design Techniques. Energies. 2025; 18(11):2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chrzan, Piotr J., and Pawel B. Derkacz. 2025. "GaN Power Transistors in Converter Design Techniques" Energies 18, no. 11: 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112890

APA Style

Chrzan, P. J., & Derkacz, P. B. (2025). GaN Power Transistors in Converter Design Techniques. Energies, 18(11), 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop