1. Introduction
Insulated cables are assets of fundamental importance for electrical power systems, being widely used in medium- (MV) and high-voltage (HV) systems. Approximately 80% of power grids are composed of underground insulated cables. These account for approximately 180,000 km of medium-voltage cables that are still in service [
1,
2].
Over the years, the technologies used to manufacture cable insulation have continuously evolved, moving from oil-impregnated paper insulation, paper-insulated lead-covered cables (PILC), which are still widely used in distribution systems, to systems with polymeric insulation, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC). However, more modern insulation technologies such as ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) and cross-linked polyethylene cable (XLPE), which are thermosetting materials with a high degree of temperature resistance, are presented as solutions with a better cost–benefit ratio, low deformation, and lower maintenance and installation costs, in addition to not using lead in their composition [
3,
4].
In virtue of their electrical and mechanical superiority, combined with the thermal properties of their polymeric material, cross-linked polyethylene-insulated cables (XLPE) have been presented as a solution with improved cost–benefit ratio, low deformation, and lower maintenance and installation costs, in addition to not using lead in their composition. In addition to the aspects previously reported is the maturation of the manufacturing process and the cables’ high transmission capacity [
5,
6,
7].
Throughout its service life, cable insulation undergoes degradation due to numerous stress factors, both environmental in nature (humidity, ambient temperature, radiation, etc.) and operational in nature (dielectric stress due to the applied voltage and temperature rise due to Joule losses resulting from the transmitted current). In addition to these factors, the cable may also be subject to mechanical stress during its installation, creating weaker points that, over time, become points that are potentially more prone to failure. The temperature to which the insulation is subjected also affects how quickly it degrades. In this case, the overheating of the cable causes chemical reactions that alter its structure, increasing its crystallinity and progressively reducing its performance as a dielectric material [
8,
9].
Different parameters can be used to qualitatively measure the degradation through aging suffered by the insulation, such as its dissipation factor (delta tangent), measurement of insulation resistance, insulation elongation (using layers of insulation aptly extracted from the cable), along with measuring the activity of partial discharges (PD), among other possibilities. In all these alternatives, the relationship between the level of degradation and the measured parameter is not linear and, much less, trivial. The variation in measurements shows trends, i.e., the evolution of the severity of degradation, but not the absolute values of accumulated damage or the remaining service life. Noteworthy here is that monitoring the evolution of PD is an effective tool for identifying the propensity for cable insulation failure, as these are the most vulnerable components of the power grid in this regard [
10,
11,
12].
Several works have been presented with the aim of evaluating the service life of insulated cables under thermal stress. Specific papers correlate the presence of thermal and mechanical stress; others relate thermal stress to electrical stress for the same purpose. In this aspect, this article aims to evaluate the rate of increase in the magnitude of PD in XLPE and EPR cables, aged in a laboratory environment by the stressor agent temperature, for the purpose of better understanding and pointing out the effects on the insulation and how this affects the service life of these assets. For this purpose, 3 m-long conductors, XLPE- and EPR-type, were selected from a 125 m coil at random and immersed in a thermal oven specially developed for the purpose of stratifying into five levels the aging at a rate of 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of degradation of the insulation for the subsequent measurement of the intensity of partial discharges.
2. Background
Partial discharge (PD) can be conceptualized as an electric discharge that occurs in a region of space subject to a high electric field, whose conduction path, formed by the discharge, does not completely connect the two electrodes. The insulating material, when subjected to a high-gradient electric field, becomes susceptible to internal discharges in the micro-cavities that gradually lead to the erosion of its walls, which may result in total discharge and the consequent failure of the cable insulation. Basically, partial discharges can be classified as internal PD, superficial PD or corona PD [
6].
It is known that most ethylene propylene (EPR) cables have a maximum working temperature of 105 °C, with the ability to operate at 140 °C for a short period of time. In [
13,
14], insulation samples were cut from an EPR cable (15 kV class) of 90 μm thickness. Hence, a constant AC voltage was applied to the cable samples by varying the test temperature: 105 °C, 140 °C, 165 °C and 190 °C. From these, insulation breakdown time data were collected to extrapolate the service life characteristics of the tested EPR samples.
In order to propose aging kinetics in a way that provides a better understanding of the effects of electrical and thermal stresses on the insulating material, so as to deliver meaningful data for the design of cables for high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems, the experiment presented in [
15,
16] was implemented. In this experiment, tests were conducted with Rogowski samples consisting of XLPE insulation with semiconductor electrodes, aged for more than 3 years (1220 days) at three different temperatures (70, 80 and 90 °C) and subjected to two DC electric fields (30 and 60 kV/mm). The magnitudes evaluated were the dielectric loss factor, volume resistivity and space charge accumulation.
Regarding the establishment of a theoretical basis for cable replacement, reference [
17] focuses investigates the thermal aging process of the cable. According to the Arrhenius model, the multivariate nonlinear regression technique was employed to analyze the data, and the cable thermal aging life prediction model was derived from the point of view of real operation. The adopted methodology, as a failure point indicator, consists of the 50% elongation retention property. The outcome suggests that the operational lifespan of the cable at 90 °C is 32.2 years, which is in line with manufacturer recommendations, thus indicating that the developed model presents promising signs. It should be noted here that the metric used for experimental development is based on IEC 60216-2 [
18].
In [
15], an established accelerated thermal aging method was employed, through the use of the Arrhenius model. This method is frequently applied in accelerated service life testing to define a voltage–lifetime relationship and estimate cable service life. Two types of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) material working at elevated temperatures between 95 and 105 °C were chosen for evaluation. In these accelerated aging processes, it becomes necessary for the insulation to reach a level of degradation considered as the end of service life of the material under evaluation. The end-of-life criterion (commonly known as the endpoint) is specified as a percentage reduction in elongation at break, which is investigated in this study as 50% retention of elongation at break. Thermal aging was performed according to [
19], and elongation at break was measured at various aging stages. The uncertainty in the measurement was estimated. Short-term data points determined by the applied aging process were plotted on the Arrhenius plot. The extrapolation of these data was used to predict long-term performance and estimate cable service life. The experimental results presented in this investigation investigated cable service life of between 7 and 30 years for nominal operating temperatures between 95 and 105 °C.
Since estimating and predicting the working lifespan of materials/products is time-consuming, the need for accelerated testing arises. In this context, in [
15,
16], an accelerated thermal aging test in air was conducted at four distinct temperatures. Due to highly coordinated and correlated variations with time, mechanical properties were selected as an important metric to assess the service life of XLPE insulation. Useful service life comes to an end when this parameter decreases to half of its primary value. Therefore, the testing of mechanical properties on XLPE insulation was performed at different thermal stresses to formulate two models: the Eyring model and a new model called the power exponential model. The latter has good accuracy at elevated temperatures when compared to other models, such as the Arrhenius model.
In [
12], the preliminary results are presented for a comprehensive investigation of thermal aging in insulating materials for medium- and high-voltage cables employing various analytical methods. Since weight loss is a significant physical property, which is influenced by thermal degradation, this method was adopted for diagnostic purposes to detect the degree of aging.
In [
13], a new approach is proposed. Based on the accelerated thermal aging analysis of ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) cables, the conceptual correlation between the elongation at break retention rate (EAB%) and the hardness retention rate were deduced from the mathematical principles of hardness testing. The relationship curve was then matched against the measured values, and the results show that there is a high degree of coincidence between the theoretical curve and the measured values. Therefore, following analysis of the experimental data of EAB% and the hardness retention rate, integrating the “temperature-time change factors” with the Arrhenius equation, the index of service life termination due to hardness retention rate is analyzed when EAB% is reduced to 30–50%. Based on the comparison of theoretical values with experimental results, the hardness retention rate reduced to 10% was proposed as the service life termination index of EPR cable.
Another factor that may influence PD activity is humidity, regardless of the age of the cable. Humidity plays an important role in partial discharge and is considered to be a complex mechanism. There is no widely accepted theory to describe the humidity effect on PD inception [
20]. In any case, it is known that humidity plays a significant role in PD activity. The partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV), for example, normally decreases with increasing humidity, as humidity influences the conductivity of the dielectrics and removal of trapped charge; consequently, the magnitude and repetition rate of the discharge is modified [
21]. In particular, the humidity absorption into the bulk of the insulating coating and the associated microscopic and macroscopic polarization processes (dielectric permittivity) may result in partial discharge changes.
Based on the above-mentioned discussions, the feasibility of accelerating the aging of cables by exposing them to temperatures above their nominal value is confirmed. That said, to evaluate the intensity of partial discharges and their evolution, through the aging of the insulation, this work adopts the metric of thermal aging of the insulating layer when the cable is exposed to high temperatures.
3. Thermal Aging
This section discusses the methodology, procedures and materials adopted to carry out accelerated thermal aging of medium voltage XLPE cables. To this end, a thermal oven was used, which was specifically developed for this objective. In this way, the insulating material, as well as the semiconductor layers of the cables, internal and external, were subjected to thermal stress, by maintaining a high temperature, through controlled aging cycles in a homogeneously heated environment.
With the aim of determining the degree of degradation of the cable insulation as a function of temperature, metrics were established to initiate thermal aging as stated. This aspect allowed for the generation of an appropriate testing and monitoring schedule.
Section 3.1 describes one of the most consolidated methods for relating temperature to the degradation of cable insulation. The cable aging schedule is presented in
Section 3.2, while the experimental procedure adopted is detailed in
Section 4.
Section 5 deals with the premises and methodology adopted for the test, the processing of results, along with obtaining the intensity of partial discharges.
3.1. Accelerated Thermal Aging Method
The principle of the method consists of carrying out aging tests at three or more constant temperatures on appropriately selected samples [
17]. Aged test specimens are subjected, at fixed times, to diagnostic procedures to detect the degree of aging. The procedures are composed of measuring significant properties (usually electrical, chemical–physical or mechanical), which are impacted by thermal degradation reactions. With the data obtained from the tests, and once the property curves have been plotted over time at different temperatures, the end point criteria need to be selected. This point corresponds to of property variation, beyond which the degree of deterioration is considered capable of reducing the capacity of the insulation to withstand real service electrical voltages. The thermal resistance curves of the tested materials can then be plotted, one for each endpoint of the selected property. These are obtained as regression lines of the experimental points that represent the logarithm of the time to the end point, i.e., mean time to failure
, by the reciprocal of the absolute temperature
, based on the life model represented by
where
and
are parameters such that the first depends on the selection of the end point and the second is pertains to the activation energy of the aging process. The IEC 60216 Standard establishes three indices to provide the characterization of thermal resistance in abbreviated numerical form:
(temperature index), which is the temperature in °C derived from the thermal resistance ratio (Equation (1)) at a given time, typically 20,000 h;
, the lower 95% confidence limit of
; and HIC (half-life interval), defined as the temperature interval in °C that expresses half the time period until the end point obtained at the temperature associated with
. Equation (1) represents the Arrhenius-type relationship commonly used to model the thermal aging behavior of electrical insulation materials, as outlined in the IEC 60216 standard [
18]. This equation expresses the logarithm of the time to failure (or to a defined degradation endpoint) as a linear function of the reciprocal of the absolute temperature. The key assumptions underlying this model are as follows: (i) the degradation kinetics are thermally activated, following an Arrhenius-type behavior; (ii) a single dominant degradation mechanism governs the aging process within the tested temperature range; and (iii) the endpoint (50% reduction in electrical strength) is a reliable indicator of the loss in the material of dielectric functionality, as supported by prior studies [
15,
16].
Based on this method, it is assumed that the real degree of degradation of the material can be identified through diagnostic techniques, although the intimate relationships between these properties and aging reactions are unknown. The IEC 60216 standard establishes endpoints and recommended properties so that many thermal resistance curves and indices can be obtained for each material studied. Nevertheless, these curves and indices can differ markedly and may not provide information about the actual aging state, thus providing service life curves that may not be consistent with failure under in-service conditions. In addition, the slope, temperature index and even linearity of the resistance graph depend on the selection of the reference property and failure criteria. In this regard, the objective of aging tests should be to select properties and endpoints capable of characterizing insulating materials by criteria in accordance with the actual stresses expected from in-service operations.
Considering that cables are subjected, primarily when in-service, to electrical, thermal and mechanical stresses, the properties selected for the aging tests carried out on XLPE cable models were electrical resistance, weight and tensile strength modulus.
The test temperatures indicated were 150, 130, 110 and 100 °C. The need to produce a single and meaningful thermal resistance graph, related to the actual failure, leads to selecting electrical resistance as the reference property on which the thermal resistance characterization is based. In fact, it has been demonstrated in [
16,
17] that an effective decrease in electrical resistance can be considered an index of chemical–physical changes and, in general, of degradation that stimulates the initiation and growth of electrical trees until the breakdown of the insulation when the voltage increases. The other properties measured for the evaluation of thermal aging (e.g., weight and tensile modulus) must then be referred to the electrical resistance for selection of the endpoint.
Figure 1,
Figure 2 and
Figure 3 show the property curves versus time for electrical strength, weight and tensile modulus, respectively (the property values refer to the initial values, those being
,
and
, measured after preprocessing, and the confidence intervals are calculated with a 95% probability).
As noted, the tested properties show a sharp drop in temperature range from 150 to 110 °C. However, at 100 °C, the decrease is small and not monotonic, remaining within the times extrapolated by the thermal resistance graph obtained from service life tests at 110, 130 and 150 °C. This behavior shows a tendency toward an upward curve for thermal resistance and could lead to the assumption that a thermal threshold close to 100 °C exists, according to non-linear service life models as suggested by some authors [
16].
From these results, representative curves of the thermal resistance of the insulation can be obtained, in accordance with the IEC 60216 standard. However, if only one of these reference service life curves, related to failure, must be selected from the wide range of possible thermal resistance graphs, the selection as the reference end point of 40–60% reduction in electrical resistance may be adopted as an appropriate failure criterion. Based on these assertions, one notes that in the temperature range of 150 to 100 °C, a reduction in electrical resistance to 50% of the initial value provides thermal resistance indices close to those obtained by the same percentage drop in the tensile modulus, along with a 0.5% decrease in weight. Therefore, by referencing the 50% electrical resistance endpoint, a single thermal resistance graph can be obtained, representative of the three selected properties, which can offer thermal resistance indicators that are potentially associated with cable degradation and loss of reliability under service conditions. Based on this failure criterion, the average temperature index
of the tested XLPE cable models is 101.2 °C, while
and HIC = 7.8 (b, the slope of the resistance line, is 5502 and a, the ordinate intercept, is −10.403).
Figure 4 presents the thermal resistance graphs thus obtained.
The thermal resistance diagram in
Figure 4 reflects the relationship between the degradation of the electrical insulation properties of XLPE cables and the thermal aging process. The reduction in electrical strength to 50% of its initial value, as adopted in this article, defines a critical threshold for the loss of dielectric performance. This degradation behavior correlates directly with the evolution of partial discharge intensity (PDI) observed in aged cables: as the insulation weakens thermally (as indicated by the thermal resistance curve), localized defects and conductive pathways develop, facilitating the initiation and propagation of partial discharges. Lower thermal resistance, therefore, corresponds to a greater propensity for partial discharge activity, especially at higher aging levels and applied voltages. In essence, the drop in electrical resistance illustrated in
Figure 4 explains the greater vulnerability to partial discharges at advanced aging stages, linking thermal degradation mechanisms with the progressive loss of dielectric integrity. This interpretation aligns with the methodology based on IEC 60216-2 and with findings from authors such as [
12], who emphasized the role of thermal and electrical stress in accelerating insulation breakdown through space charge accumulation and reduced dielectric strength.
Linear regression of the midpoints shown in
Figure 4 results in the following relationship
or even,
where
is the temperature in kelvin and
is the equivalent age of the cable.
3.2. Cable Aging Schedule
Using Equation (3), one can estimate the rate of acceleration of aging more assertively and, consequently, calculate the time needed for the cable to reach the maximum permitted point of the selected properties for a to guarantee given temperature. In other words, this is the time required to reach 100% aging when subjected to a temperature .
Taking as a basis an expected service life of 20,000 h for the cable, one notes that, according to Equation (3), the average temperature of the cable throughout its operating period should be 104.11 °C. That said, one obtains Equation (4), defined as the aging acceleration factor (AAF).
Therefore, for an
, at a given temperature
, the cable is aging twice as fast; its expected service life is reduced to 10,000 h.
For the aging temperature of 140 °C, Equation (4), one obtains a . Therefore, for a given aging percentage, for example 20%, the accelerated aging time is given by h.
In order to better monitor the degradation of the insulation, it was decided to stratify the aging of the cables into five levels. Accordingly, by maintaining an internal furnace temperature of 140 °C,
Table 1 shows the expected times for equivalent aging.
It should be emphasized that the thermal aging procedure was conducted while maintaining solely and exclusively a uniformly distributed temperature inside the oven at 140 °C, in accordance with the time indicated in
Table 1 for each percentage of aging.
5. Results and Discussion
With the aim of evaluating the relationship between the growth rate of partial discharge intensity due to insulation aging, for different voltage levels, and to make a comparative analysis between two of the main insulators, XLPE and EPR, a heatmap was obtained from the data collected in a controlled environment. This metric presents a three-dimensional view of the behavior of cable insulation, where colors indicate the values of Partial Discharge Intensity (PDI) as a function of voltage [kV] and aging percentage—%ENV.
Figure 11a shows the heatmap for XLPE-insulated cables, while
Figure 11b illustrates the heatmap for EPR-insulated cables.
For XLPE-insulated cables, the PDI shows a progressive rate of growth as the applied voltage and the aging percentage increase. This behavior reflects the accumulation of dielectric deterioration over time due to the applied aging acceleration factor, which is in addition to the increase in the applied voltage. Regarding voltages above 13 kV and aging levels above 80%, a significant increase in PDI is observed (values above 300 pC). This point indicates an advanced stage of dielectric strength degradation, where the insulation is most likely close to its critical limit. However, at low voltages (5 kV to 8.7 kV), PDI values are more controlled (below 150 pC), indicating resistance of XLPE in the early stages of service life (20 to 60% of %ENV).
On the whole,
Figure 11b illustrates that for EPR conductors, these present a more dispersed relationship between voltage, %ENV and PDI. Growth in PDI is faster at intermediate aging levels (60–80%) compared to XLPE. However, from 15 kV and with aging above 80%, PDI values exceed 400 pC, suggesting accelerated degradation in the final stages of service life. Different to XLPE, EPR already presents higher PDIs at moderate voltages (8.7 kV to 11 kV) and low levels of aging. This can be explained by the greater structural heterogeneity of the EPR, which results in a lower initial resistance to partial discharges.
For voltages U < 11 kV, XLPE-insulated cables present low PDIs (<150 pC) even during intermediate stages of aging. This reinforces its electrical stability in applications of lower stress. Conversely, EPR cables present moderate PDIs (150–250 pC) under similar conditions, indicating a greater sensitivity to initial defects. However, for U > 13 kV, the IDP increases gradually but in a controlled manner, up to aging levels of 80% in XLPE cables. Henceforth, there is a rapid growth of values in magnitude. Nevertheless, for EPR insulation, a faster growth in PDI is observed at intermediate levels of aging, suggesting that electrical failures can occur over a wider range of conditions. Therefore, it is evident that the effect of aging is more pronounced in EPR insulation, with significantly higher PDIs already at 60–80% ENV, while XLPE only shows critical signs after 80% ENV. Still regarding the effect of aging, for XLPE insulation aging has a marked impact, with a sharp increase in PDs as of 80% ENV. For moderate voltages (7–11 kV), the growth of PDs is less expressive at the initial levels of aging but accelerates with the increase in %ENV. The XLPE matrix appears to exhibit greater stability at low levels of aging. As for EPR, the increase in PDs due to aging is more linear and less abrupt compared to XLPE, reflecting the greater initial strength of the material. The EPR shows higher intensities at 20–40% ENV, especially at low to moderate voltages (7–11 kV), which can be attributed to the elastomeric structure that allows for greater initial dissipation of electrical energy. The differences in the partial discharge intensity (PDI) behavior between XLPE- and EPR-insulated cables, as shown in
Figure 11, can be attributed to their intrinsic material properties. XLPE (cross-linked polyethylene) is a semi-crystalline polymer with a relatively homogeneous structure, which confers higher dielectric strength, lower defect density, and greater resistance to electrical treeing in early stages of aging. Consequently, XLPE maintains lower PDI values under moderate voltages and initial levels of aging. In contrast, EPR (ethylene-propylene rubber) is an elastomeric material with an inherently more heterogeneous and amorphous structure, characterized by variable cross-linking and filler dispersion. This heterogeneity introduces localized weak points and microstructural defects, making EPR more susceptible to partial discharge initiation even at lower voltages and early stages of aging. Additionally, the mechanical flexibility of EPR, while beneficial for installation, can lead to stress concentration zones under thermal aging, accelerating dielectric degradation compared to XLPE. Therefore, the higher and more dispersed PDI observed for EPR across aging levels and voltages is primarily due to its greater structural and compositional variability [
4].
In the interest of observing how the intensity of the PDs (in pC) varies with the applied voltage,
Figure 12 presents histograms combined with density curves that illustrate the distribution of magnitudes of partial discharges (PD) for different voltage levels in kV, with
Figure 12a directed to XLPE-insulated cables and
Figure 12b to EPR insulation.
For lower voltages (e.g., 5 kV and 7 kV), the graphs show distributions that are more concentrated at lower PD magnitude values, indicating that the insulation provides better support for these voltage conditions with lower intensity events. As the applied voltage increases (e.g., 13 kV, 17.4 kV), there is a noted shift in the distributions towards higher values of PD magnitude. This is expected, as higher voltages result in more intense electric fields, which can excite regions of the insulation where there is a failure. The density curves show variations in the uniformity of the distributions, so that for XLPE-insulated cables there is a greater concentration in specific intensity ranges, suggesting uniform deterioration characteristics. However, for cables with EPR, more dispersed distributions are observed, possibly reflecting heterogeneities in the material. Regarding the relationship between voltage and PDI, XLPE-insulated cables demonstrate that the discharge density at lower voltages is significantly lower, which indicates better performance under normal operating conditions.
As the voltage increases, the discharge density increases, which may reflect the approaching of critical points in the insulation. EPR cables, for intermediate voltages,
Figure 12b, present greater density variability in different magnitude ranges, suggesting greater susceptibility to initial discharges. However, for higher voltages, the distribution shows a behavior more similar to that of XLPE. Through such aspects, we reach the conclusion that XLPE insulation,
Figure 12a, presents greater stability when faced with increasing voltages, evidenced by the concentration of discharges across specific bands.
The aforementioned analyses show clear differences in the physical–chemical nature of the insulators evaluated herein. As the aging percentage increases, the intensity of partial discharges intensifies for each magnitude of applied voltage. This aspect is given greater clarification by
Figure 13a with regard to XLPE insulation, and by
Figure 13b with regard to EPR.
According to the results obtained for XLPE,
Figure 13a, for a 20% ENV, one notes that the PDI is relatively low, remaining within moderate values up to voltages of approximately 10–12 kV. However, for voltages above 12 kV, there is an exponential growth in PDI, with greater variability in the data, which denotes the initial sensitivity of the material. As for 40% ENV, a similar behavior pattern to that of 20% ENV is evident, however, with slightly higher average PDI values for all applied voltages. Noted here is that the initial stability of the material is still present. However, the growth of the PDI for voltages above 12 kV is more pronounced. Regarding 60% ENV, the PDI increases significantly across the entire voltage range, with greater data dispersion. The region of dielectric instability begins to manifest itself with more intensity, especially at voltages above 10 kV. For 80% ENV, the increase in PDI becomes more linear with an increasing voltage. This aspect suggests an advanced degradation of the insulation, which corroborates the methodology used to accelerate aging, thus going against expectations, since from 15 kV, there are sharp peaks that show local failures in the material. Regarding 100% ENV, one notes that the cables present higher PDI values across all voltage levels, with exponential growth after 12 kV. This behavior indicates the progressive collapse of the dielectric integrity, evidenced by the high dispersion of the data.
Based on the results presented in
Figure 13b, for a 20% ENV, one notes that the PDI is higher in EPR compared to XLPE at low voltage levels (<10 kV), suggesting a more sensitive initial response. However, there is some stability of the PDI for voltages between 10 and 12 kV, with progressive growth and less dispersion compared to XLPE. For 40% ENV, the increase in magnitude of PDI with increasing voltage is more linear, but the values are significantly higher compared to XLPE. It is worth noting that from 14 kV, the EPR shows a pronounced increase in PDI, indicating greater susceptibility to higher voltages. As for a 60% ENV, a more uniform behavior for the EPR can be evidenced; the curve reflects a gradual transition to dielectric failure regime. However, PDI remains at high levels, especially above 12 kV. In the case of 80% ENV, there is a significant increase in PDI for voltages above 14 kV, with less relative dispersion compared to XLPE. EPR behavior demonstrates greater predictability, although the PDI values are high. However, for 100% ENV, one notes that the PDI is higher for EPR compared to XLPE at all voltage levels, with linear growth up to approximately 12 kV and exponential after this range. Therefore, the conclusion is reached that the dielectric stability of EPR is more compromised, reflecting greater degradation at advanced levels of aging.
To corroborate the performed analyses,
Table 4 presents the main findings obtained concerning
Figure 13.
Table 4 presents the stratified aging schedule for different degradation levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%), calculated based on the aging acceleration factor (AAF) derived from Equation (4), itself a direct outcome of the Arrhenius relationship established prior. The assumption here is that aging can be uniformly accelerated by increasing the temperature, and that the degradation behavior observed at elevated temperatures can be extrapolated to normal service conditions, consistent with the approaches described by [
15,
16]. Therefore, Equation (1) and
Table 4 together form the backbone of the thermal aging model applied in the study, enabling controlled laboratory simulation of cable insulation degradation for subsequent analysis of partial discharge progression.
Using the boxplots illustrated in
Figure 14, primary results are obtained to evaluate the behavior of XLPE insulation under different operating conditions, considering the impact of aging and voltage on partial discharges.
In general, for all voltages, there is a systematic increase in PDI as the percentage of aging increases. This behavior reflects the progressive degradation of the XLPE polymer matrix, which facilitates the formation and propagation of microdischarges in the pores and microcracks created by the aging process. At lower aging rates (20–40%), PDI is relatively low, and the dispersion of the data (interquartile range) is small. For high aging values (80–100%), the scatter increases significantly, indicating greater variability in the material response due to localized failure mechanisms or uneven degradation. Regarding voltage, 5–8.7 kV, PDI increases moderately as aging increases. The scatter at low voltage levels is smaller, indicating that XLPE maintains relatively stable performance at low voltages, even with aging. For voltages between 11–15 kV, PDI begins to increase sharply, especially at aging levels above 60%. At such levels, an increase in the interquartile range is observed, suggesting that the distribution of failures in the material becomes more heterogeneous as the voltage approaches the dielectric strength limit of XLPE. However, for U = 17.4 kV, the increase in PDI is substantial, and the data variability reaches its peak, with the presence of outliers at high levels of aging. This behavior indicates that, under high voltage, XLPE presents critical behavior, with high susceptibility to failures due to severe structural degradation.
The increase in PDI with aging is directly related to the formation of conductive microchannels and the weakening in the molecular structure of XLPE. The application of high voltages intensifies these effects, promoting the initiation and propagation of partial discharges in vulnerable regions. For applications at voltages above 15 kV and/or aging greater than 80%, XLPE performance becomes critical, suggesting the need for continuous monitoring or cable replacement.
That said, one notes that for voltages up to 8.7 kV, XLPE maintains good performance even at advanced levels of aging, being suitable for applications in low voltage systems. For intermediate voltages (11 kV to 15 kV), aging significantly impacts performance, requiring greater attention in operating environments where conditions are considered severe. At high voltages (17.4 kV), the cable reaches its dielectric limits, presenting high variability in PDI and a high risk of failure.
For EPR insulation,
Figure 15 shows the boxplots obtained. In this Figure, the fundamental results are displayed, these are capable of providing greater clarification for the performance of EPR insulation under different operational conditions, which consider the impact of aging and voltage on partial discharges.
As with XLPE cable, a progressive increase in PDI is observed as aging increases (%ENV). This behavior is associated with the deterioration of the EPR matrix, which presents the formation of microcracks and possible areas of lower density, which favors partial discharges. The dispersion for low aging levels (20–40%) is smaller, indicating uniformity in EPR performance. However, at more advanced aging (80–100%), the dispersion increases significantly, especially under high voltage. Regarding applied voltages, at low voltages (5 kV to 8.7 kV), the PDI remains at relatively controlled levels, even with an increase in aging. Additionally, data dispersion is smaller, which is evidence of greater EPR stability at low voltages. As for intermediate voltages (11 kV to 15 kV), the growth of PDI becomes more evident, with greater dispersion towards higher aging levels. PDI is shown to be more dependent on aging, suggesting greater vulnerability of the insulation in medium voltage applications. For high voltages (17.4 kV), the growth in the PDI is accentuated, with a large variability in the values, along with the presence of outliers, thus indicating critical degradation zones in the EPR structure. The presence of outliers at higher voltages and high aging percentages suggests heterogeneity in material degradation. These points can be attributed to the formation of local defects, such as inclusions, cracks or areas of accumulated stress, which favor the onset of partial discharges. Furthermore, EPR performance is more uniform at low voltages, while at voltages above 13 kV, degradation accelerates, reflecting the critical behavior of the material under severe electrical stress.
Table 5 summarizes the main findings obtained from this case study.
6. Conclusions
The experimental analysis conducted in this study investigated the relationship between the percentage of accelerated aging (%ENV), the intensity of partial discharges (PDI), as well as the voltage applied to XLPE- and EPR-insulated cables. The results demonstrated that both materials exhibit nonlinear behavior in the evolution of PDI due to aging and voltage, with significant differences in their responses that can be attributed to the intrinsic structural and dielectric characteristics of each insulation.
Regarding the relationship between PDI and %ENV, a consistent growth in PDI was observed with the increase in %ENV for both materials. This behavior may be attributed to the progressive degradation of the dielectric properties of the insulation, which results in the formation of defects, such as microcracks and areas of lower density, which are conducive to the emergence of partial discharges. EPR insulation showed greater susceptibility to aging, especially at high voltage levels (>13 kV), reflected in higher average PDI values and greater data dispersion compared to XLPE.
In terms of the voltage magnitude, for voltages below 11 kV, both materials showed relatively stable behavior, with a lower PDI growth rate and controlled dispersion, indicating that the insulating properties remain functionally adequate for moderate aging levels. However, for U > 13 kV, a sharp increase in PDI was observed, thus demonstrating significant degradation of the insulation, mainly at aging levels above 60%. At high voltages (~17.4 kV), both XLPE and EPR reached their functional limits, with emphasis on EPR, which presented greater variability and occurrence of outliers, indicating greater structural vulnerability under critical operating conditions.
Overall, considering the experiment setup used herein, XLPE showed superior performance under high-voltage conditions, with lower PDI intensity and greater resistance to advanced aging. This makes it best suited for medium and high voltage applications, where electrical stress is significant. EPR, on the other hand, was shown to be more stable at low voltages (<11 kV), with uniform behavior even at moderate levels of aging. However, at high voltages, the material showed greater susceptibility to degradation, reflected in the sharp growth of the PDI and greater dispersion of the results, considering the experimental setup employed herein.
Heat maps and boxplots highlighted the correlation between %ENV and PDI, especially at high voltages. As aging and stress increase, PDI levels become more pronounced and variable, highlighting the complex interaction between these factors. Furthermore, the presence of outliers under critical conditions indicates the heterogeneity of degradation in the materials, mainly in the EPR, suggesting that localized areas of greater deterioration may compromise the dielectric integrity of the entire cable.
The results presented provide important contributions toward an adept understanding into the behavior of cable insulation when subject to accelerated aging, thus contributing to the development of diagnostic and predictive maintenance strategies in electrical systems.
Additionally, it is recommended that future studies explore the influence of other factors, such as humidity and chemical agents, as well as carry out tests to obtain the dissipation factor and accumulated partial discharges to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the degradation of insulated cables. These factors can complement the presented analyses and improve the service life prediction models for XLPE- and EPR-insulated cables under diverse operating conditions.