Next Article in Journal
The Advancements and Challenges in Organic Photovoltaic Cells: A Focused and Spotlight Review Using the Proknow-C
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation of the Values of Electrical Shock Currents during Live-Line Work in Multi-Circuit, Multi-Voltage HVAC Transmission Lines
Previous Article in Journal
A New Method for Evaluating the Brittleness of Shale Oil Reservoirs in Block Y of Ordos Basin of China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Current Harmonic Impact on Active Power Losses and Temperature Distribution in Power Cables
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Arc Extinguishing and Insulation Properties of C4F7N/CO2 Mixtures with Oxygen Addition: Experimental Investigations and Comparative Analysis

by
Dongyu Guo
1,
Xiaolong Li
1,2,*,
Wen Wang
2 and
Zhenxin Geng
1
1
School of Electrical Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Power Grid Environmental Protection, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4202; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174202
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering: 3rd Edition)

Abstract

The C4F7N/CO2 mixture is considered one of the most promising alternatives to sulfur SF6. Recent studies have shown that the addition of O2 to the C4F7N/CO2 mixture can suppress carbon precipitation following electric arc discharges. This paper conducts arc-burning experimental research on SF6, 10%C4F7N/90%CO2, and 10%C4F7N/85%CO2/5%O2 mixtures. Measurements were taken of the arc voltage and arc current under a 10 kA breaking current for these three gases. Additionally, the pressure at the nozzle throat during arc and cold flow conditions, as well as the pressure in the storage chamber, were measured. The post-arc current and Rate of Rise of Recovery Voltage (RRRV) for the three gases were calculated. The study also compared the solid precipitates in the gas medium after multiple arc-burning experiments. The results indicate that adding O2 to the C4F7N/CO2 mixture can increase the pressure at the nozzle throat during the arc phase, and the inclusion of O2 has minimal impact on the peak arc-extinguishing voltage and critical RRRV. It is hypothesized that a small amount of oxygen has a negligible effect on the thermal recovery properties of the C4F7N/CO2 mixture, while also inhibiting the precipitation of carbon following electric arc discharges. This research could provide a reference for developing and optimizing eco-friendly high-voltage circuit breakers.

1. Introduction

SF6 gas is commonly used as the insulating medium in high-voltage equipment such as Gas-Insulated Switchgear (GIS) and gas circuit breakers [1,2,3,4]. The Kyoto Protocol, enacted in 1997, designated SF6 as one of the six gases targeted for global greenhouse gas emissions reduction, making searching for eco-friendly alternative gas-insulating mediums a focal point and hotspot of research among scholars worldwide [5,6,7,8,9]. In recent years, C4F7N, newly discovered by 3M, has demonstrated electrical performance comparable to SF6 while causing minimal atmospheric pollution, and is considered the most promising alternative to SF6, garnering continuous attention from researchers globally since its inception [10,11,12]. With a boiling point of only −4.7 °C at atmospheric pressure, C4F7N typically uses CO2 or N2 as a buffer gas for mixing to meet usage requirements [13,14].
Following the introduction of C4F7N, many scholars have conducted research on its insulating properties. The results of experiments conducted by the French company Alstom using 145 kV GIS equipment, as reported in [15], indicate that when the volume fraction of C4F7N is between 18% and 20%, the breakdown voltage of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures is comparable to that of SF6. B.Y. Zhang et al., in [16], investigated the partial discharge characteristics of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures and SF6, obtaining and comparatively analyzing the inception voltages of partial discharges for both gases. The results show that at pressures of 80 kPa, 100 kPa, and 120 kPa, the inception voltages of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures with a 15% volume fraction of C4F7N are almost identical to those of SF6. X. Lin et al., in [17], discovered through dynamic breakdown experiments that compared to pure SF6, the C4F7N mixtures exhibits a significant “low-pressure breakdown” phenomenon, with greater variability in dynamic breakdown voltages. However, considering that C4F7N decomposes under the action of high-energy electric arcs, and the decomposed gas components can deposit on electrodes forming a layer of ash, thereby affecting the gas’s performance and posing potential threats to equipment, O2 is introduced as a second buffer gas. The purpose is to react with the precipitated carbon to regenerate CO2, thus reducing carbon formation under arc conditions [18]. While there are reports on the insulating properties of the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures [19,20,21], studies on their arc-extinguishing characteristics are still relatively scarce.
For the reasons outlined above, this paper conducts arc combustion experiments on SF6, 10%C4F7N/90%CO2, and 10%C4F7N/85%CO2/5%O2 mixtures. Arc voltages and currents were measured under a breaking current of 10 kA for these gases. Additionally, the pressures in the nozzle throats during both arcing and cold flow states, as well as the pressures in the gas storage chambers, were measured. The study also calculated the post-arc currents and the critical Rate of Rise of Recovery Voltage (RRRV) for these gases (RRRV is the rate at which the voltage across the terminals of a circuit breaker increases after the interruption of the fault current and the extinction of the arc. It is a critical parameter in assessing the performance of a circuit breaker, as it reflects the circuit breaker’s ability to withstand the transient recovery voltage (TRV) without re-ignition of the arc). A comparison of the solid precipitates within the gaseous media after multiple arc combustion experiments was conducted. During these experiments, the storage tank pressure was maintained at 8 bar, while the chamber was pressurized to 4 bar. The findings from this research could guide the design and optimization of eco-friendly gas circuit breakers.

2. Experimental Methods

To measure the parameters of electric arcs in different gaseous media, this study constructed an arc generation experimental platform consisting of three main components: a power supply circuit, an arcing device, and a measurement system. The overall schematic of the platform is shown in Figure 1.
The platform utilizes an LC oscillation circuit as its power source, which includes a charging switch MS, a capacitor Cs, an inductor Ls, a discharging switch Sx, a closing switch MB, and a discharging resistor Rx. Before the start of the experiment, the capacitor is pre-charged to store energy, which is then discharged through the inductor at the onset of the experiment to produce a sinusoidal current. By presetting the parameters of the capacitor and inductor, the charging voltage of the capacitor can be adjusted to control the frequency and peak of the current. The maximum charging voltage of the capacitor in the device is 2 kV, with an oscillation output frequency and current of 50 Hz, 0~100 kA (15 Hz, 0~25 kA).
The arc generation device primarily consists of an experimental tank and a storage tank, with the experimental tank internally equipped with a storage chamber and a nozzle. The test tank has a height of 300 mm and an internal diameter of 248 mm. The gas storage chamber has a height of 200 mm and an internal diameter of 87 mm. The capacity of the gas storage tank is 30 L. The main material is 304 stainless steel. The lower electrode is installed in a fixed position inside the storage chamber. Initially, the upper electrode passes through the nozzle to contact the lower electrode. An arc is ignited by separating the movable upper electrode, driven by a pneumatic actuator, from the fixed lower electrode. Figure 2a and Figure 2b, respectively, display the physical and schematic diagrams of the arc generation tank. The storage chamber is connected to the storage tank via a high-pressure rubber hose, controlled by an electromagnetic valve to regulate the flow. The inflation pressure of the storage tank is approximately twice that of the experimental tank. When the electromagnetic valve is opened, gas from the storage tank rapidly enters the storage chamber. The blockage of the nozzle by the upper electrode quickly increases the pressure within the storage chamber, and after the upper electrode moves away from the nozzle, a blow-out arc is formed due to the rapid pressure change. This experiment employs two methods for measuring dynamic pressure at the storage chamber and nozzle throat: direct measurement and measurement via a pressure transducer tube. Figure 2c and Figure 2d illustrate the connections of pressure sensors at the two measurement locations, respectively.
This study used an upper and lower electrode, a cylindrical pin electrode and a hollow electrode, respectively, with the front end made of Cu20%/W80% copper–tungsten material. The diameter of the upper electrode is 18 mm. The nozzle material is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) doped with 5% boron nitride, with a height of 80 mm, an inlet diameter of 61 mm, an outlet diameter of 56 mm, a throat diameter of 20 mm, and a nozzle throat length of 8 mm. The proportions of the C4F7N mixtures are 10%C4F7N/90%CO2 and 10%C4F7N/85%CO2/5%O2, respectively. The gas storage tanks were pressurized to an absolute pressure of 8 bar, with a tank inflation pressure of 4 bar, and the current used during the arc ignition experiments was 10 kA.
The equipment used for conducting experimental measurements includes the following components:
(1)
Rogowski coil: CWT150 (precision 0.1%, sensitivity 0.2 mV/A, conversion rate 40 kA/µs), utilized for measuring the arc current;
(2)
Differential probe: HT8100 (precision 2%, rise time 3.5 ns) used for measuring arc voltage;
(3)
Displacement sensor: Hermit (precision 0.1 mm) employed for tracking the trajectory of the upper electrode;
(4)
Pressure probe: 8530b–500 (precision 0.5%) for measuring dynamic pressure in the nozzle throat and gas storage chamber.
The specific experimental process is divided into a preparation phase and an experimental phase. During the preparation phase for the mixture arc ignition experiments, the internal gas storage container of the gas recovery system is used to mix the gases. Initially, a smaller amount of C4F7N gas is loaded and the gas flow rate is strictly controlled to prevent condensation. The gases are left to stand for 24 h to ensure even mixing, and a gas mixing ratio detector is used to ensure the error is less than 0.5%. During the experimental phase, the experimental tank, gas storage tank, and pipelines are first evacuated to ensure a vacuum level below 50 Pa. Then, the gas from the storage container is transferred into the experimental and storage tanks. After each experiment, some of the gas inside the experimental tank is recovered and the gas inside the storage tank is replenished to maintain a constant pressure difference.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Study on Pressure Characteristics

This paper simulates gas blowing by pre-charging the gas storage chamber from the gas storage tank and shortening the distance from the nozzle outlet to the nozzle throat for ease of installation. Consequently, the paper analyzes the pressure variations under cold flow conditions in comparison with the position of the upper electrode to explain the changes observed in the pressure measurements. Figure 3a displays the dynamic pressures measured in the gas storage chamber and nozzle throat under cold flow conditions. Figure 3b illustrates the dynamic stroke of the upper electrode, which helps elucidate the variations in air pressure. Position 1 is the initial position of the upper electrode. At approximately 30 ms, the valve between the gas storage tank and the gas storage chamber opens, allowing gas to flow from the storage tank into the storage chamber, causing a rapid increase in chamber pressure. However, because the upper electrode blocks the nozzle throat while also covering the pressure measurement port of the nozzle throat, there is no significant rise in the pressure at the nozzle throat until about 133 ms. At this point, the upper electrode moves to Position 2, where the nozzle throat’s pressure port is no longer obstructed, leading to a rapid increase in the pressure of the nozzle throat. By 137 ms, or Position 3, the valve between the storage tank and storage chamber closes, and the upper electrode also moves away from the nozzle throat. This removal of the obstruction allows the gas to flow rapidly out of the storage chamber, causing a swift decrease in the pressure in both the storage chamber and the nozzle throat. It is also observed that the pressure in the nozzle throat decreases faster than in the storage chamber and remains below the initial tank pressure for a period, confirming the presence of a strong airflow. Position 4 is the stopping position of the upper electrode.
In high-voltage switchgear, gas (air) purging methods are commonly used to ensure that the arc is effectively extinguished after it has been interrupted. By comparing the flow characteristics of the extinguishing media in the nozzle, this study analyzes the extinguishing capabilities of different gases. During arc extinguishing experiments with SF6, C4F7N/CO2, and C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures, dynamic pressure changes in the nozzle throat were monitored and the pressure differential between the nozzle throat and the storage chamber after the electrode left the nozzle throat was calculated; the calculation results are shown in Figure 4b.
As shown in Figure 4a, the pressure in the nozzle throat during the arcing stage increased by approximately 0.5 bar compared to the cold flow stage in the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures. In contrast, in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures, the pressure in the nozzle throat during the arcing stage increased by approximately 1.1 bar compared to the cold flow stage, which is significantly higher than that in the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures. It is hypothesized that the addition of O2 enhances the radial heat conduction of the arc, resulting in a larger arc diameter in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures. In practical circuit breakers, higher throat pressures in the nozzle imply that more gas can be compressed within the expansion chamber prior to the major nozzle opening, and consequently, a stronger blast intensity can assist in the medium’s recovery after the nozzle opens. Hence, it is beneficial to add O2 to the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures to enhance the extinguishing performance of the blend. Figure 4b illustrates the changes in the pressure differential between the gas storage chamber and the nozzle throat, with time zero corresponding to the moment when the upper electrode departs from the nozzle throat. At the moment the upper electrode leaves the nozzle throat, the velocity of the airflow is at its fastest, leading to a rapid decline in the pressure within the nozzle throat. Consequently, there is a brief rise in the pressure differential between the gas storage chamber and the nozzle throat, peaking at approximately 9 ms. After a portion of the gas inside the storage chamber is depleted, the pressure differential between the storage chamber and the nozzle throat begins to decrease, eventually stabilizing. By examining the highest pressure differentials and the stabilization time in the three gases, it is evident that the SF6 gas exhibits a significantly higher peak pressure differential and a slower rate of pressure decline. This suggests that in practical circuit breakers, those utilizing SF6 gas as the filling medium can maintain a more stable blasting strength during the interrupting process, aiding in arc extinguishing.

3.2. Study on Arc Voltage and Current Characteristics

This paper further compares the arc voltage and arc conductivity of three different gases. It is important to note that during the first half-cycle of the arc when the arc current is high and the arc voltage is low, the arc conductivity often exhibits a very high value. Our primary focus is on the pattern of changes in arc conductivity during the half-cycle before extinguishing. Additionally, during the first half-cycle of the arc, the electrode has not yet left the nozzle throat, lacking the cooling effect of the blast on the arc. Therefore, this study only conducts a calculation and analysis of the arc conductivity during the second half-cycle of the arc. The starting moment of the arc conductivity in Figure 5b corresponds to the zero-crossing point of the first half-cycle of the arc.
As shown in Figure 5a, arcing begins at approximately 2.5 ms in all three gases, with a corresponding current of 7.9 kA. The near-cathode voltage drop at the moment of arcing is approximately 30 V in SF6 gas and about 20 V in C4F7N mixtures. The appearance of the near-cathode voltage drop is due to the small electrode gap at the moment of arcing, while electrons rapidly move towards the anode within the arc gap, forming a positive space charge region near the cathode. As the gap widens, the arc resistance increases, and consequently, the voltage across the arc rises. At the zero-crossing instant of the current, there is no significant difference in the arc voltage among the three gases. After the current zero-crossing, the polarity of the arc voltage reverses, resulting in a typical “saddle-shaped” voltage waveform during the second half-wave of arcing.
During the second half-wave of the arc, the arc voltage in SF6 gas is significantly lower than that in the mixtures. At 19 ms, as the current crosses zero, the arc extinguishes, and a noticeable extinguishing voltage spike occurs. In SF6 gas, this extinguishing voltage spike reaches 1.125 kV, while in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures and the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures, the spikes are both 0.9 kV. This indicates that the addition of O2 has a minimal effect on the extinguishing voltage spike, suggesting that a small amount of oxygen has little impact on the thermal recovery characteristics of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures.
g = i u
g is the arc conductivity, i is the arc current, and u is the arc voltage.
Figure 5b presents the arc conductivity during the second half-wave of the current for three gases. As shown in Equation (1), the arc conductivity in this paper is calculated by directly dividing the arc voltage by the arc current. From the figure, it is evident that the arc conductivity in SF6 gas is higher than in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures and the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures. Specifically, the peak arc conductivity in SF6 gas is approximately 60 S, while the maximum arc conductivities in both mixtures are the same, around 42 S. The overall trend of arc conductivity initially increases and then decreases. During the rising phase, there are no significant differences between the two mixtures in terms of arc conductivity. However, during the declining phase, the arc conductivity in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures is slightly lower than that in the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures.

3.3. Thermal Interrupting Capability Assessment

The post-arc current is considered a crucial indicator of interrupting capability. Compared to the Cassie arc model, which is applied to the high-current phase, the Mayr arc model can more accurately describe the arc behavior during the current zero-crossing phase. Therefore, this paper uses the Mayr arc model to calculate the post-arc current and the critical TRV for three different gases. As shown in Equation (2), the calculation of post-arc current using the Mayr arc model requires the determination of the arc time constant and the dissipation coefficient. These parameters are calculated using the arc voltage and arc conductivity data from the 50 microseconds preceding current zero-crossing, as shown in Figure 6. The results indicate that the time constant and dissipation coefficient for the SF6 arc are 3.44 μs and 193.15 kW, respectively. For the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures, these values are 3.54 μs and 143.08 kW, and for the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures, they are 3.60 μs and 142.75 kW.
d g d t = 1 τ P u 2 g
g is the arc conductivity, u is the arc voltage, τ is the time constant, and P is the dissipation coefficient.
Using the calculated time constants and dissipation coefficients, the post-arc currents of the three gases under different RRRV values were computed, with the results shown in Figure 7.
The critical RRRV for SF6 gas is 1.26 kV/μs, while the critical RRRV for the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures and the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures are close, at 1.06 kV/μs and 1.04 kV/μs, respectively. This further indicates that the addition of a small amount of oxygen has a minimal impact on the thermal recovery characteristics of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures.

3.4. Solid Product Analysis

Analysis of the precipitates inside the experimental vessel after arc combustion in different gases showed that the precipitates in the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures appeared as black powder, while those in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures were dark grey. Reference [22] utilized energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to study the solid products after disconnecting the C4F7N mixed gas and found that the products were primarily composed of C, F, O, and Cu elements. These sediments are prone to floating within the switchgear due to gas blowing and mixing with the gas medium, potentially impairing the gas medium’s arc-extinguishing and insulation performance. Additionally, they can easily adhere to the switchgear’s internal structure, posing a threat to its bonding structure. The lighter color of the sediments in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixed gas compared to the black sediments in the C4F7N/CO2 mixed gas indicates that the addition of oxygen can effectively inhibit the carbon precipitation phenomenon of C4F7N and CO2 under the influence of the arc. The solid deposits inside the experimental tank after the arc-firing tests in the C4F7N mixtures are shown in Figure 8.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the arc parameters in SF6 gas, C4F7N/CO2/O2 gas mixtures, and C4F7N/CO2 mixtures under the action of free-flame arc and gas flow and the dynamic pressure changes in the gas storage chamber and nozzle throat were measured, and the experimental results were compared and analyzed, and the following conclusions were obtained:
  • The arc in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures increases the pressure at the nozzle throat more than in the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures, suggesting that in practical circuit breakers, the arc in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures can more effectively block the nozzle throat, enhancing the blasting strength. Additionally, the flow rate of the C4F7N mixtures is higher than that of SF6, which in practical circuit breakers may lead to a rapid drop in the pressure of the interrupter chamber during the interrupting process, potentially failing to maintain sufficient blasting strength to assist in arc extinguishing at the current zero moment;
  • Comparing the arc extinguishing voltage peaks and critical RRRV between C4F7N/CO2 and C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures reveals that there is no significant difference in the extinguishing voltage peaks, with the critical RRRV differing by only 0.02 kV/μs. This suggests that the addition of a small amount of oxygen has a minimal impact on the thermal recovery characteristics of the C4F7N/CO2 mixtures;
  • After conducting breaking experiments in three different gases, a comparison of the solid residues inside the vessels reveals that the color of the product in the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures is significantly lighter than that in the C4F7N/CO2 mixture. This indicates that oxygen effectively inhibits the deposition of carbon under the influence of an electric arc in fluorocarbon gases, thereby enhancing their insulation properties. Therefore, using the C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures as the filling medium for circuit breakers appears to be the better choice;
  • To provide more comprehensive support for the design and optimization of new environmentally friendly circuit breaker structures and to more thoroughly evaluate the application prospects of the C4F7N mixtures, we plan to conduct experiments in our future work to measure the arc temperatures in different C4F7N mixtures and perform a more detailed analysis of the composition of solid products after the arc-firing tests.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft: D.G.; validation: D.G.; Data curation and visualization: D.G.; Conceptualization: X.L.; Investigation and funding acquisition: X.L.; Resources: W.W. and Z.G.; Project administration and supervision: W.W. and Z.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Power Grid Environmental Protection (No. GYW51202301431).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the valuable suggestions provided by Zhaoxuan Cui during the writing of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schneider Electric. SF6 Properties and Use in MV and HV Switchgear. Cahiers Techniques. Available online: https://www.studiecd.dk/cahiers_techniques/SF6_properties.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2024).
  2. Gui, Z.W.; Li, Y. Challenges and proposals on SF6 emission reduction approaches. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167347. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simmonds, P.G.; Rigby, M.; Manning, A.J.; Park, S.; Stanley, K.M.; McCulloch, A.; Henne, S.; Graziosi, F.; Maione, M.; Arduini, J.; et al. The increasing atmospheric burden of the greenhouse gas SF6. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 7271–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beroual, A.; Haddad, A. Recent advances in the quest for a new insulation gas with a low impact on the environment to replace SF6 gas in high-voltage power network applications. Energies 2017, 8, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reilly, J.; Prinn, R.; Harnisch, J. Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature 1999, 401, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iwata, H.; Okada, K. Greenhouse gas emissions and the role of the Kyoto Protocol. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2014, 16, 325–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, S.; Liu, W.; Ding, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Rao, X.; Wan, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Study on subacute inhalation toxicity and offspring teratogenicity of C4F7N: An environmentally friendly insulating gas to replace SF6. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 387, 135799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, W.; Geng, Z. Analysis of Breaking Characteristics of C4F7N/CO2 Mixture Gas in Circuit Breaker. Energies 2024, 17, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmed, R.; Abd-Rahman, R.; Ullah, Z.; Ullah, R.; Sami, I.; Yousof, M.F. The Insulation Performance of Novel Refrigerant Gas as an Alternative to SF6 for Medium Voltage Switchgear. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 47068–47079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, S.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, W.; Liu, Y. Adsorption properties of envirormentally friendly insulating medium C4F7N and its common decomposition products in NaA, NaZSM-5, and NaX molecular sieves. High Volt. 2022, 8, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seeger, M.; Smeets, R.; Yan, J.; Ito, H.; Claessens, M.; Dullni, E.; Falkingham, L.; Franck, C.M.; Gentils, F.; Hartmann, W.; et al. Recent trends in development of high voltage circuit breakers with SF6 alternative gases. Plasma Phys. Technol. 2017, 4, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rabie, M.; Franck, C.M. An assessment of eco-friendly gases for electrical insulation to replace the most potent industrial greenhouse gas SF6. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nechmi, H.E.; Beroual, A.; Girodet, A.; Vinson, P. Fluoronitriles/CO2 gas mixture as promising substitute to SF6 for insulation in high volt-age applications. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 5, 2587–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kieffel, Y.; Biquez, F. SF6 alternative development for high voltage switchgears. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 7–10 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kieffel, Y.; Irwin, T.; Ponchon, P.; Owens, J. Greengas to replace SF6 in electrical grids. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2016, 14, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, B.Y.; Uzelac, H.; Cao, Y. Fluoronitrile/CO2 mixtures as an eco-friendly alternative to SF6 for medium voltage switchgears. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1340–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; Zhong, J.; Song, Y.; Zhang, Y. Dynamic dielectric strength of C3F7CN/CO2 and C3F7CN/N2 gas mixtures in high voltage circuit breakers. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2022, 37, 4032–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meyer, F.; Huguenot, F.; Kieffel, Y. Application of Fluoronitrile/CO2/O2 Mixtures in High Voltage Products to Lower the Environmental Footprint; CIGRE Reports; CIGRE: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Na, J.Y.; Hwang, R.; Cho, S.J.; Song, T.H.; Lee, B.W. Breakdown Characteristics of a Fluoronitrile Mixture Gas According to Mixing Ratio and Oxygen Content for High-Voltage Power Equipment Application. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 16117–16126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y.; Gao, K.L.; Yuan, S.; Yan, X.L.; Bi, J.G. Study on the power frequency breakdown characteristics of C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixed gas under typical electric field. Trans. China Electrotech. Soc. 2022, 37, 4032–4041. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, Y.; Gao, K.L.; Wang, B.S.; Yan, X.L.; Cao, R.J.; Zhang, S.L. Decomposition characteristics of C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures by AC corona discharge. High Volt. Technol. 2023, 49, 955–961. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, B.Y.; Zhou, R.; Hao, M.; Yang, T.; Li, X.W.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, K.; Deng, Y.K. Research on the application of C4F7N mixtures in 40.5 kV circuit breakers (Part 2): Arc extinguishing performance experiment and post-arc decomposition characteristics. Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng. 2022, 42, 9147–9159. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Electric arc generator with power supply and measuring system.
Figure 1. Electric arc generator with power supply and measuring system.
Energies 17 04202 g001
Figure 2. (a,c,d) are physical diagrams of the arc generation device, the pressure measuring point of the gas storage chamber, and the pressure measuring point at the nozzle throat, respectively. (b) is a schematic diagram of the internal structure of the arc generation tank. Key: 1: Arc generation tank, 2: Solenoid valve, 3: Gas storage tank, 4: Pressure tube.
Figure 2. (a,c,d) are physical diagrams of the arc generation device, the pressure measuring point of the gas storage chamber, and the pressure measuring point at the nozzle throat, respectively. (b) is a schematic diagram of the internal structure of the arc generation tank. Key: 1: Arc generation tank, 2: Solenoid valve, 3: Gas storage tank, 4: Pressure tube.
Energies 17 04202 g002aEnergies 17 04202 g002b
Figure 3. (a) The dynamic pressures measured in the gas storage chamber and nozzle throat under cold flow conditions. (b) The dynamic stroke of the upper electrode.
Figure 3. (a) The dynamic pressures measured in the gas storage chamber and nozzle throat under cold flow conditions. (b) The dynamic stroke of the upper electrode.
Energies 17 04202 g003
Figure 4. (a) The dynamic pressure variation in the nozzle throat under arc-burning conditions. (b) The pressure difference between the gas storage chamber and the nozzle throat after the upper electrode leaves the nozzle.
Figure 4. (a) The dynamic pressure variation in the nozzle throat under arc-burning conditions. (b) The pressure difference between the gas storage chamber and the nozzle throat after the upper electrode leaves the nozzle.
Energies 17 04202 g004
Figure 5. Arc voltage (a) and its conductivity (b) in three types of gases.
Figure 5. Arc voltage (a) and its conductivity (b) in three types of gases.
Energies 17 04202 g005
Figure 6. (a) Arc time constant. (b) Arc dissipation coefficient.
Figure 6. (a) Arc time constant. (b) Arc dissipation coefficient.
Energies 17 04202 g006
Figure 7. Post arc-current for (a) SF6, (b) C4F7N/CO2, and (c) C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures.
Figure 7. Post arc-current for (a) SF6, (b) C4F7N/CO2, and (c) C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures.
Energies 17 04202 g007
Figure 8. Solid deposits inside the experimental tank after arc-firing tests in C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures and C4F7N/CO2 mixtures: (a) Comparison, (b) C4F7N/CO2, (c) C4F7N/CO2/O2.
Figure 8. Solid deposits inside the experimental tank after arc-firing tests in C4F7N/CO2/O2 mixtures and C4F7N/CO2 mixtures: (a) Comparison, (b) C4F7N/CO2, (c) C4F7N/CO2/O2.
Energies 17 04202 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, D.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Geng, Z. Effect of the Arc Extinguishing and Insulation Properties of C4F7N/CO2 Mixtures with Oxygen Addition: Experimental Investigations and Comparative Analysis. Energies 2024, 17, 4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174202

AMA Style

Guo D, Li X, Wang W, Geng Z. Effect of the Arc Extinguishing and Insulation Properties of C4F7N/CO2 Mixtures with Oxygen Addition: Experimental Investigations and Comparative Analysis. Energies. 2024; 17(17):4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Dongyu, Xiaolong Li, Wen Wang, and Zhenxin Geng. 2024. "Effect of the Arc Extinguishing and Insulation Properties of C4F7N/CO2 Mixtures with Oxygen Addition: Experimental Investigations and Comparative Analysis" Energies 17, no. 17: 4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174202

APA Style

Guo, D., Li, X., Wang, W., & Geng, Z. (2024). Effect of the Arc Extinguishing and Insulation Properties of C4F7N/CO2 Mixtures with Oxygen Addition: Experimental Investigations and Comparative Analysis. Energies, 17(17), 4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop