Review of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell-Powered Systems for Stationary Applications Using Renewable Energy Sources
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Microgrid System and Architecture
2.1. Energy Management System (EMS) in Microgrids
2.2. Energy Storage System in Microgrids (Low- and High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage)
2.2.1. Critical Analysis of Hydrogen Storage System Approaches
2.2.2. Existing Challenges and Future of Energy Storage Systems
Publication | Challenges | Future |
---|---|---|
Tajjour and Chandel [21], 2023 | Battery sizing and secure operation of microgrid | AI applications, technique development, blockchains, and Reinforcement Learning techniques |
Hassan et al. [72], 2023 | General challenges: scaling up hydrogen storage technologies, high cost of hydrogen production and storage, need for more extensive infrastructure, and low production efficiency Storage-specific challenges: low energy density, high-pressure or low-temperature requirements, safety concerns, and storage materials | Increase in clean and sustainable energy, high-density, efficient, and cost-effective hydrogen storage materials, and reduced storage volume |
Schiaroli et al. (2024) [73] | Hydrogen flammability and safety | Better risk management and control of and reduction in risks |
Ghorbani et al. (2023) [75] | Safe and efficient storage, operating conditions, and application | Improvements in goals, energy safety, and efficiency |
Ma et al. (2023) [76] | Cost of large-scale hydrogen storage and high energy requirements for gas compression | Decrease in costs, a novel evaluation method of the technical and economic feasibility, and new infrastructure and storage |
Abdalla et al. (2018) [77] | Weight, volume, cost, efficiency, codes, and standards Safe, reliable, and cost-effective | Advances in storage technologies and infrastructure |
Rasul et al. (2022) [78] | Development of hydrogen storage Storage conditions of hydrogen Container material degradation | Novel storage systems Increase in demand for hydrogen |
Bosu et al. (2024) [79] | Operational challenges, cost-effective storage, technical challenges, dehumidification of hydrogen, and storage system volume problem | New storage materials, catalytic doping and structural modification, accurate lifecycle analysis, and nanocomposites |
Moran et al. (2024) [80] | Storage size and cost | Increase in storage size reduces overall levelized cost |
Hannan et al. (2022) [82] | A hybrid storage system (capacity, long lifespan, low cost, high efficiency, and high security) | Extended lifetime, lower cost, and higher security |
Saadat et al. (2024) [83] | Hydrogen interactions with microorganisms in underground storage, in situ reactions, and leakages | Resilience and environmental safety |
Higgs et al. (2024) [84] | Potential contamination and/or changes to rock properties and leakages from hydrogen storage in porous media | More research on hydrogen reactivity, mobility through seals, gas mixtures, and storage site |
SaberiKamarposhti et al. (2024) [85] | Data security and privacy, interoperability, and the technical constraints of AI for hydrogen systems | Decentralization and autonomous energy management system |
Van et al. (2023) [20] | Forecasting power production and load demand | Multi-microgrid systems, environmental objectives, the utilization of other hydrogen roles, and accurate microgrid modelling |
Sikiru et al. [75], 2024 | A safe, dependable, and cost-efficient large-scale storage system needed, as well as reliability Lack of appropriate standards and codes | Safe and dependable performance Reduced cost in large-scale hydrogen utilization Improvement in durability and efficiency |
3. Optimization Methods
4. Critical Findings and Future Recommendations Including Objectives and Constraints
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sun, C.; Negro, E.; Vezzù, K.; Pagot, G.; Cavinato, G.; Nale, A.; Bang, Y.H.; Di Noto, V. Hybrid inorganic-organic proton-conducting membranes based on SPEEK doped with WO3 nanoparticles for application in vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.S.; Mekhilef, S. Renewable energy integration: An approach for diesel generator replacement in telecommunication tower. Energy Procedia 2014, 61, 2073–2076. [Google Scholar]
- Lasseter, R.H. Smart distribution: Coupled microgrids. Proc. IEEE 2011, 99, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, N.-K.C.; Zhang, L. SmartGrid: Future networks for New Zealand power systems incorporating distributed generation. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 3418–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turkdogan, S. Optimisation of a Renewable-Based Hybrid Energy System for Residential and Transportation Applications Using HOMER. Renew. Energy J. 2019, 134, 845–856. [Google Scholar]
- Castañeda, M.; Cano, A.; Jurado, F.; Sánchez, H.; Fernández, L.M. Optimization and Management of a Hybrid Energy System Combining Photovoltaic, Hydrogen, and Battery Storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 172, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
- NREL/TP-7A40-70552; Analysis of Renewable Energy Hybrid Systems for Off-Grid Telecom Towers. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
- Nawaz, A.; Kamel, S.; Alam, M.; Khan, F. Multi-Microgrids: Concept, Control, and Applications for Enhancing RES Integration. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115570. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, X.; Xu, Z.; Jia, Q.S. Energy-Efficient Buildings Facilitated by Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2010, 1, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, W.; Chan, K.W. Smart Home Energy Management Systems: Concept, Configurations, and Scheduling Strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 669–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palensky, P.; Dietrich, D. Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2011, 7, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawaz, A.; Zhou, M.; Wu, J.; Long, C. A comprehensive review on energy management, demand response, and coordination schemes utilization in multi-microgrids network. Appl. Energy 2022, 323, 119596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Mathur, H.D.; Mishra, P.; Bansal, R.C. A critical and comparative review of energy management strategies for microgrids. Appl. Energy 2022, 327, 120028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.; Mifta, Z.; Salsabil, N.A.; Papiya, S.J.; Hossain, M.; Roy, P.; Chowdhury, N.-U.-R.; Farrok, O. A critical review on control mechanisms, supporting measures, and monitoring systems of microgrids considering large scale integration of renewable energy sources. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 4582–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gugulothu, R.; Nagu, B.; Pullaguram, D. Energy management strategy for standalone DC microgrid system with photovoltaic/fuel cell/battery storage. J. Energy Storage 2023, 57, 106274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahane, A.S.; Sharma, R.B. Hybrid AC-DC microgrid coordinated control strategies: A systematic review and future prospect. Renew. Energy Focus 2024, 49, 100553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Mei, X. Microgrids energy management considering net-zero energy concept: The role of renewable energy landscaping design and IoT modeling in digital twin realistic simulator. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 63, 103621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molu, R.J.J.; Naoussi, S.R.D.; Wira, P.; Mbasso, W.F.; Kenfack, S.T.; Kamel, S. Optimization-based energy management system for grid-connected photovoltaic/battery microgrids under uncertainty. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, A.R.; Baleanu, D. Recent developments of energy management strategies in microgrids: An updated and comprehensive review and classification. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 297, 117723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van, L.P.; Chi, K.D.; Duc, T.N. Review of hydrogen technologies based microgrid: Energy management systems, challenges and future recommendations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 14127–14148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajjour, S.; Chandel, S.S. Metaheuristic and Machine Learning Techniques for Solving Challenges in Renewable Energy Systems. Energy 2023, 262, 125487. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, Q.M.; Nguyen, D.L.; Nguyen, Q.A.; Pham, T.N.; Phan, Q.T.; Tran, M.H. A Bi-level optimization for the planning of microgrid with the integration of hydrogen energy storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 63, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phan-Van, L.; Takano, H.; Duc, T.N. A comparison of different metaheuristic optimization algorithms on hydrogen storage-based microgrid sizing. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammara, U.; Zehra, S.S.; Nazir, S.; Ahmad, I. Artificial neural network-based nonlinear control and modeling of a DC microgrid incorporating regenerative FC/HPEV and energy storage system. Renew. Energy Focus 2024, 49, 100565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, N.; Pezhmani, Y.; Jordehi, A.R.; Mansouri, S.A. A two-layer hybrid robust-stochastic model for energy management of isolated multi-energy microgrids with mobile storage systems and hydrogen refueling stations. J. Energy Storage 2024, 90, 111905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilic, H. Improving the performance of microgrid-based Power-to-X systems through optimization of renewable hydrogen generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 75, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousri, D.; Farag, H.E.; Zeineldin, H.; El-Saadany, E.F. Integrated model for optimal energy management and demand response of microgrids considering hybrid hydrogen-battery storage systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 280, 116809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, R.; Tang, K.; Lee, K.Y. Optimal Configuration of Self-Consistent Microgrid System with Hydrogen Energy Storage for Highway Service Area. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2023, 56, 7960–7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelghany, M.B.; Al-Durra, A.; Daming, Z.; Gao, F. Optimal multi-layer economical schedule for coordinated multiple mode operation of wind–solar microgrids with hybrid energy storage systems. J. Power Sources 2024, 591, 233844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Pei, W.; Mei, C.; Deng, W.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Q. Transform from gasoline stations to electric-hydrogen hybrid refueling stations: An islanding DC microgrid with electric-hydrogen hybrid energy storage system and its control strategy. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 136, 107684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamout, M.W.; Perl, A.; Hengeveld, E.J.; Aué, J.J. Simulation and analysis of hybrid hydrogen-battery renewable energy storage for off-electric-grid Dutch household system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 70, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Yang, K.; Song, Z.; Ma, Y.; Meng, J. Inner-outer layer co-optimization of sizing and energy management for renewable energy microgrid with storage. Appl. Energy 2024, 363, 123066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Cao, X.; Li, M.; Zhai, Q.; Guan, X. Seasonal operation planning of hydrogen-enabled multi-energy microgrids through multistage stochastic programming. J. Energy Storage 2024, 85, 111125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Liu, X.; Kong, X.; Ma, L.; Lee, K.Y.; Xu, Y. PV/Hydrogen DC microgrid control using distributed economic model predictive control. Renew. Energy 2024, 222, 119871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Dong, W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q. Multiple time-scale energy management strategy for a hydrogen-based multi-energy microgrid. Appl. Energy 2022, 328, 120195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.; Zheng, W.; Cao, X.; Sun, X.; He, Z. Co-planning of hydrogen-based microgrids and fuel-cell bus operation centers under low-carbon and resilience considerations. Appl. Energy 2023, 336, 120849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X.; Li, X.; Yuan, J.; Jin, Y. A hydrogen-based zero-carbon microgrid demonstration in renewable-rich remote areas: System design and economic feasibility. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 120039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- K/bidi, F.; Damour, C.; Grondin, D.; Hilairet, M.; Benne, M. Multistage power and energy management strategy for hybrid microgrid with photovoltaic production and hydrogen storage. Appl. Energy 2022, 323, 119549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Dong, W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q. Multi-stage and multi-timescale optimal energy management for hydrogen-based integrated energy systems. Energy 2024, 286, 129576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huangfu, Y.; Tian, C.; Zhuo, S.; Xu, L.; Li, P.; Quan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, R. An optimal energy management strategy with subsection bi-objective optimization dynamic programming for photovoltaic/battery/hydrogen hybrid energy system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 3154–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, H.; Andersen, A.N.; Østergaard, P.A.; Mathiesen, B.V.; Connolly, D. From Electricity Smart Grids to Smart Energy Systems—A Market Operation Based Approach and Understanding. Energy 2012, 42, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanbin, A.; Abdolmaleki, L.; Berardi, U. Techno-economic feasibility of integrating hybrid-battery hydrogen energy storage in academic buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 309, 118445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, L.; Zhang, B.; Huang, W.; Li, Y.; Hou, L.; Xiao, J.; Mao, Z.; Li, X. A review of hydrogen generation, storage, and applications in power system. J. Energy Storage 2024, 75, 109307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, V.; Chaturvedi, P. Design, control, reliability, economic and energy management of microgrid: A review. E-Prime-Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2023, 5, 100239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van, L.P.; Hieu, L.H.; Do Chi, K.; Takano, H.; Duc, T.N. An improved state machine-based energy management strategy for renewable energy microgrid with hydrogen storage system. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouaouda, A.; Sayouti, Y. An optimal sizing framework of a microgrid system with hydrogen storage considering component availability and system scalability by a novel approach based on quantum theory. J. Energy Storage 2024, 92, 111894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, H. A tri-objectives scheduling model for renewable-hydrogen-based microgrid system considering hydrogen storage system and demand-side management. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 68, 1412–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelghany, M.B.; Mariani, V.; Liuzza, D.; Glielmo, L. Hierarchical model predictive control for islanded and grid-connected microgrids with wind generation and hydrogen energy storage systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 51, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Li, S.; Fu, A.; Cvetković, M.; Palensky, P.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Hierarchical online energy management for residential microgrids with Hybrid hydrogen–electricity Storage System. Appl. Energy 2024, 363, 123020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giovanniello, M.A.; Wu, X.Y. Hybrid lithium-ion battery and hydrogen energy storage systems for a wind-supplied microgrid. Appl. Energy 2023, 345, 121311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Xiao, Y.; Lu, S. Optimal configuration of multi microgrid electric hydrogen hybrid energy storage capacity based on distributed robustness. J. Energy Storage 2024, 76, 109762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, H.; Wang, J.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, W. Optimization of configurations and scheduling of shared hybrid electric hydrogen energy storages supporting to multi-microgrid system. J. Energy Storage 2023, 74, 109420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Y.; Li, Q.; Ai, Y.; Wang, T.; Chen, W.; Bai, H.; Liu, S.; Gao, F. Optimal scheduling for microgrids considering long-term and short-term energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2024, 93, 112137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseri, N.; El Hani, S.; El Harouri, K.; Mediouni, H. Primary and secondary control of an autonomous solar microgrid based power-to-X: Renewable hydrogen conversion. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 24421–24438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Cao, X.; Zhai, Q.; Guan, X. Risk-constrained planning of rural-area hydrogen-based microgrid considering multiscale and multi-energy storage systems. Appl. Energy 2023, 334, 120682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Er, G.; Soykan, G.; Canakoglu, E. Stochastic optimal design of a rural microgrid with hybrid storage system including hydrogen and electric cars using vehicle-to-grid technology. J. Energy Storage 2024, 75, 109747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, Y.; Cai, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X. Techno-economic design of energy systems for airport electrification: A hydrogen-solar-storage integrated microgrid solution. Appl. Energy 2021, 283, 116374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Sharma, R.; Murthy, S.S.; Dutta, P.; He, W.; Wang, J. Thermal analysis and optimization of stand-alone microgrids with metal hydride based hydrogen storage. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wang, B.; Jiao, K.; Ni, M.; Du, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ling, G.; Wang, C. Comparative techno-economic analysis of large-scale renewable energy storage technologies. Energy AI 2023, 14, 100282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Fan, H.; Yang, H.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, H. Design, construction, and operation of hydrogen energy storage system for zero-carbon pumping units. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignataro, V.; Liponi, A.; Bargiacchi, E.; Ferrari, L. Dynamic model of a Power-to-Gas system: Role of hydrogen storage and management strategies. Renew. Energy 2024, 120789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdolmaleki, L.; Berardi, U. Hybrid solar energy systems with hydrogen and electrical energy storage for a single house and a midrise apartment in North America. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 1381–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Zhou, J.; Liang, G.; Du, P.; Li, Z.; Li, C. Optimizing large-scale hydrogen storage: A novel hybrid genetic algorithm approach for efficient pipeline network design. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 66, 430–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, F.; Zhao, F.; Liu, X.; Mu, Z.; Hao, H.; Liu, Z. A Comparative Well-to-Wheel Analysis of Renewable Energy Pathways for Hydrogen and Battery Electric Vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 466, 142832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, A.I.; Nasr, M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Hosny, M.; Farghali, M.; Al-Fatesh, A.S.; Abd El-Monaem, E.M. Advances in hydrogen storage materials: Harnessing innovative technology, from machine learning to computational chemistry, for energy storage solutions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 67, 1270–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ba-Alawi, A.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Aamer, H.; Yoo, C. Techno-economic risk-constrained optimization for sustainable green hydrogen energy storage in solar/wind-powered reverse osmosis systems. J. Energy Storage 2024, 90, 111849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Di, J.; Lang, Z.; Meng, Z.; Shi, X.; Du, D.; He, Q. Thermodynamic modeling and analysis of hydrogen storage systems in hydrogen refueling stations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 57, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L.; Yang, H.; Ju, Y. Review on the key technologies and future development of insulation structure for liquid hydrogen storage tanks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 57, 1302–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Peng, W.; Hua, Z.; Zheng, J. A comparative analysis of the regulations, codes and standards for on-board high-pressure hydrogen storage cylinders. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 54, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meda, U.S.; Bhat, N.; Pandey, A.; Subramanya, K.N.; Raj, M.L.A. Challenges associated with hydrogen storage systems due to the hydrogen embrittlement of high strength steels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 17894–17913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pleshivtseva, Y.; Derevyanov, M.; Pimenov, A.; Rapoport, A. Comparative analysis of global trends in low carbon hydrogen production towards the decarbonization pathway. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 32191–32240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Sameen, A.Z.; Salman, H.M.; Jaszczur, M.; Al-Jiboory, A.K. Hydrogen energy future: Advancements in storage technologies and implications for sustainability. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiaroli, A.; Scarponi, G.E.; Antonioni, G.; Cozzani, V. Hazard footprint of alternative fuel storage concepts for hydrogen-powered urban buses. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 50, 1430–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikiru, S.; Oladosu, T.L.; Amosa, T.I.; Olutoki, J.O.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Abioye, K.J.; Ur Rehman, Z.; Soleimani, H. Hydrogen-powered horizons: Transformative technologies in clean energy generation, distribution, and storage for sustainable innovation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 56, 1152–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, B.; Zendehboudi, S.; Saady, N.M.C.; Dusseault, M.B. Hydrogen storage in North America: Status, prospects, and challenges. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, N.; Zhao, W.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. Large scale of green hydrogen storage: Opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 50, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, A.M.; Hossain, S.; Nisfindy, O.B.; Azad, A.T.; Dawood, M.; Azad, A.K. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 165, 602–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasul, M.G.; Hazrat, M.A.; Sattar, M.A.; Jahirul, M.I.; Shearer, M.J. The future of hydrogen: Challenges on production, storage and applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 272, 116326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosu, S.; Rajamohan, N. Recent advancements in hydrogen storage-Comparative review on methods, operating conditions and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 352–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moran, C.; Deane, P.; Yousefian, S.; Monaghan, R.F. The hydrogen storage challenge: Does storage method and size affect the cost and operational flexibility of hydrogen supply chains? Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Algburi, S.; Jaszczur, M.; Al-Jiboory, A.K.; Al Musawi, T.J.; Ali, B.M.; Viktor, P.; Fodor, M.; Ahsan, M.; Salmon, H.M. Hydrogen role in energy transition: A comparative review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 184, 1069–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannan, M.A.; Abu, S.M.; Al-Shetwi, A.Q.; Mansor, M.; Ansari, M.N.M.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Dong, Z.Y. Hydrogen energy storage integrated battery and supercapacitor based hybrid power system: A statistical analysis towards future research directions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 39523–39548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saadat, Z.; Farazmand, M.; Sameti, M. Integration of underground green hydrogen storage in hybrid energy generation. Fuel 2024, 371, 131899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgs, K.E.; Strogen, D.P.; Nicol, A.; Dempsey, D.; Leith, K.; Bassett, K.; Reid, C.; Yates, E.; Parker, M.; Bischoff, A.; et al. Prospectivity analysis for underground hydrogen storage, Taranaki basin, Aotearoa New Zealand: A multi-criteria decision-making approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 71, 1468–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SaberiKamarposhti, M.; Kamyab, H.; Krishnan, S.; Yusuf, M.; Rezania, S.; Chelliapan, S.; Khorami, M. A comprehensive review of AI-enhanced smart grid integration for hydrogen energy: Advances, challenges, and future prospects. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 67, 1009–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakut, Y.B. A new control algorithm for increasing efficiency of PEM fuel cells—Based boost converter using PI controller with PSO method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 75, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezk, H.; Aly, M.; Fathy, A. A novel strategy based on recent equilibrium optimizer to enhance the performance of PEM fuel cell system through optimized fuzzy logic MPPT. Energy 2021, 234, 121267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ding, R.; Cao, F.; Li, J.; Dong, H.; Shi, T.; Xing, L.; Liu, J. Comparison of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms and data-driven optimization methods for mitigating nitrogen crossover in PEM fuel cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 442, 136064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chammam, A.; Tripathi, A.K.; Nu, J.R.; Alsaab, H.O.; Romero-Parra, R.M.; Mayet, A.M.; Abdullaev, S.S. Multiobjective optimization and performance assessment of a PEM fuel cell-based energy system for multiple products. Chemosphere 2023, 337, 139348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rezk, H.; Ferahtia, S.; Djeroui, A.; Chouder, A.; Houari, A.; Machmoum, M.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Optimal parameter estimation strategy of PEM fuel cell using gradient-based optimizer. Energy 2022, 239, 122096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guoa, C.; Luc, J.; Tiana, Z.; Guob, W.; Darvishand, A. Optimization of critical parameters of PEM fuel cell using TLBO-DE based on Elman neural network. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 183, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Zaman, S.; Kong, S.; Liu, M.; Zou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ning, H.; Peng, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; et al. Optimization strategies and diagnostic techniques for water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Green Chem. Eng. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, A.G.; Olabi, A.G.; Rezk, H.; Fathy, A.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Optimized energy management and control strategy of photovoltaic/PEM fuel cell/batteries/supercapacitors DC microgrid system. Energy 2024, 290, 130121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Wu, W.; Chang, K.; Li, Y.; Pei, P.; Xu, X. Performance degradation prediction method of PEM fuel cells using bidirectional long short-term memory neural network based on Bayesian optimization. Energy 2023, 285, 129469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de la Cruz-Soto, J.; Azkona-Bedia, I.; Velazquez-Limon, N.; Romero-Castanon, T. A techno-economic study for a hydrogen storage system in a microgrid located in baja California, Mexico. Levelized cost of energy for power to gas to power scenarios. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 30050–30061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz, I.U.; de Queiróz Lamas, W.; Lotero, R.C. Development of an optimization model for the feasibility analysis of hydrogen application as energy storage system in microgrids. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 16159–16175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aba, M.M.; Sauer, I.L.; Amado, N.B. Comparative review of hydrogen and electricity as energy carriers for the energy transition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 57, 660–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.T.; Sharma, P.; Bora, B.J.; Tran, V.D.; Truong, T.H.; Le, H.C.; Nguyen, P.Q.P. Fueling the future: A comprehensive review of hydrogen energy systems and their challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 54, 791–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yao, J.; Guo, T.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, B. An overview of application-oriented multifunctional large-scale stationary battery and hydrogen hybrid energy storage system. Energy Rev. 2024, 3, 100068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehr, A.S.; Phillips, A.D.; Brandon, M.P.; Pryce, M.T.; Carton, J.G. Recent challenges and development of technical and technoeconomic aspects for hydrogen storage, insights at different scales; A state of art review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 70, 786–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hren, R.; Vujanović, A.; Van Fan, Y.; Klemeš, J.J.; Krajnc, D.; Čuček, L. Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, A.H.; Kazmi, S.A.A.; Hassan, M.; Ali, S.M.; Anwar, M. Analysis of fuel cell integration with hybrid microgrid systems for clean energy: A comparative review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 52, 1005–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeq, A.M.; Homod, R.Z.; Hussein, A.K.; Togun, H.; Mahmoodi, A.; Isleem, H.F.; Patil, A.R.; Moghaddam, A.H. Hydrogen energy systems: Technologies, trends, and future prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 939, 173622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohammad, S.S.; Iqbal, S.J. Hydrogen technology supported solar photovoltaic-based microgrid for urban apartment buildings: Techno-economic analysis and optimal design. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 302, 118146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, R.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Liang, Y.; Yan, J. Green hydrogen-based energy storage service via power-to-gas technologies integrated with multi-energy microgrid. Appl. Energy 2023, 350, 121716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Yang, M.; Shi, L.; Hou, Z.; Xu, S.; Sun, C. Adaptive state-of-health temperature sensitivity characteristics for durability improvement of PEM fuel cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 491, 151951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eikeng, E.; Makhsoos, A.; Pollet, B.G. Critical and strategic raw materials for electrolysers, fuel cells, metal hydrides and hydrogen separation technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 71, 433–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, V.; Reshmi, P.V.; Prajna, S.; Haleshappa, D.; Jayarama, A.; Pinto, R. Degradation mechanisms in PEM fuel cells: A brief review. Mater. Today: Proc. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vichard, L.; Harel, F.; Ravey, A.; Venet, P.; Hissel, D. Degradation prediction of PEM fuel cell based on artificial intelligence. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 14953–14963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziane, M.A.; Join, C.; Benne, M.; Damour, C.; Steiner, N.Y.; Pera, M.C. A new concept of water management diagnosis for a PEM fuel cell system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 285, 116986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, W.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xie, C.; Song, J.; Deng, Z.; Tan, J.; Zhang, R. Operating conditions combination analysis method of optimal water management state for PEM fuel cell. Green Energy Intell. Transp. 2023, 2, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esbo, M.R.; Ranjbar, A.A.; Rahgoshay, S.M. Analysis of water management in PEM fuel cell stack at dead-end mode using direct visualization. Renew. Energy 2020, 162, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
SN | References | Highlights |
---|---|---|
1 | Guan, X. et al. [9], 2010 | Algorithms such as model predictive control (MPC), genetic algorithms (GAs), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are used to optimize energy distribution and resource allocation within the microgrid. |
2 | Zhou, Y. et al. [10], 2014 | Real-time sensor and smart meter data are analyzed to inform energy management decisions, predict demand and supply fluctuations, and optimize energy resource operations. |
3 | Palensky, P. et al. [11], 2011 | Demand response adjusts power demand rather than supply, using strategies like load shedding and shifting to align consumption with available supply. |
4 | Dongfang Chen et al. [12], 2022 | A novel approach for predicting the performance degradation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells utilizes a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) neural network, optimized by a Bayesian algorithm, to enhance voltage prediction accuracy in PEM fuel cells. |
5 | Pavitra Sharma et al. [13], 2022 | Classifies energy management systems (EMSs) by supervisory control, operating time platform, and decision-making strategies. Examines optimization techniques, including conventional programming (linear, nonlinear, mixed-integer), metaheuristic (particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm), and AI-based methods (fuzzy logic, neural networks). |
6 | Mahmudul Hasan et al. [14], 2023 | The article reviews microgrid control mechanisms, focusing on centralized, decentralized, and distributed strategies. It highlights the importance of effective monitoring for real-time management and discusses using IoT and advanced communication technologies to enhance microgrid monitoring and control. |
7 | Gugulothu et al. [15], 2023 | Presents a study on the configuration and control of a DC microgrid with photovoltaic (PV) systems, fuel cells, and battery energy storage systems (BESSs). Fuel cell output is controlled based on the BESS’s state of charge (SOC) to optimize hydrogen usage under varying loads. Adjusting hydrogen and oxygen pressures in the fuel cell enhances power output, efficiently meeting additional load demands. |
8 | Atul S. Dahane et al. [16], 2024 | Focuses on Demand Side Management (DSM) and its importance in modern energy systems, highlighting the integration of intelligent energy systems and smart loads to improve energy efficiency and grid stability. |
9 | Peng Wu et al. [17], 2024 | The article explores the integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and digital twin technology in the management of hybrid microgrids (HMGs) with a focus on achieving net-zero energy. |
10 | Reagan Jean Jacques Molu et al. [18], 2023 | The article presents an optimization-based energy management system (EMS) designed for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV)/battery microgrids, addressing the challenges of uncertainty in energy generation and demand. Utilizes linear programming (LP) and mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) for optimization, aiming to minimize operating costs. |
11 | Ali Reza Abbasi et al. [19], 2023 | This review provides a comprehensive analysis of energy management strategies in MGs, focusing on advancements from 2009 to 2022. It systematically classifies various methods based on techniques, control strategies, and structures, highlighting the integration of renewable energy resources and energy storage systems. Enhancing real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and system optimization using IoT-enabled sensors and digital twin simulations. |
12 | Long Phan Van et al. [20], 2023 | Analyzed different optimization methods used in EMSs, such as fuzzy logic control, model predictive control, heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms, stochastic and robust programming, and hybrid approaches. Detailed the objectives (technical, economic, environmental) and constraints (energy storage, power capacity, transmission) considered in designing EMSs for hydrogen-based microgrids. |
Publication | Goals and Aims | Methods and Conditions | Some Results |
---|---|---|---|
Nguyen et al. [22], 2024 | - Microgrid planning - Scheduling the operation of the microgrid - Minimizing the overall operating costs of microgrid and operational cost of the tank system | - Two-layer optimization model - Connected to main grid; bidirectional energy exchange is possible | The proposed model reduced the overall operating costs by 42.75% compared against single-level model |
Phan-Van et al. [23], 2023 | - Finding optimal size of a hydrogen-storage-based microgrid - Cost minimization of the microgrid - Contains battery and tank | - Comparison of 8 metaheuristic optimization algorithms (artificial bee colony, biogeography-based optimization, genetic algorithm, harmony search, invasive weed optimization, particle swarm optimization, shuffled complex evolution, and teaching–learning based optimization) | The particle swarm optimization algorithm was the best, reducing annual system costs by 25.3% compared to the worst energy management strategy in algorithm testing. |
Ammara et al. [24], 2024 | - A mathematical model for DC microgrids - Ensuring and maximizing power production | - Artificial neural network | The simulations showed that load demands were met efficiently along with the global asymptotic stability of the system |
Rezaei et al. [25], 2024 | - Energy management for isolated multi-energy microgrids which were used for hydrogen refueling stations | - A two-layer framework for islanding operation of a multi-energy microgrid, mixed-integer linear programming | The simulations showed that the model decreased the expected operational cost |
Kilic [26], 2024 | - Energy management system - Improving power quality - Reducing operational costs - Optimization of hydrogen production | - A modified version of the Symbiotic Differential Whale Optimization Algorithm | The solution maintains DC-Link voltage stability despite varying renewable energy production and provides substantial cost reduction |
Yousri et al [27], 2023 | - Minimize the electricity and battery degradation costs, customers’ discomfort, and peak-to-average ratio - In four-scenario testing: good, bad, and average weather scenarios and a forecasted weather profile | - A model for energy management and demand response for hybrid energy storage system consisting of batteries and hydrogen tanks - A multi-objective artificial hummingbird optimizer | The model increased customers’ savings and decreased greenhouse gas emissions in all four scenarios |
Shi et al. [28], 2023 | - Self-consistent microgrid with hydrogen storage for transportation | - Particle swarm optimization | The storage stabilizes varying energy production from the wind and provides adjustability |
Abdelghany et al. [29], 2024 | - Predictive control for islanded and grid-connected modes - Considering daily as well as real-time markets (which have different timescale) | - Advanced model predictive control strategy | Tested on lab scale The solution minimizes bidirectional exchange with grid and operational costs. It is also capable in four modes: islanded, grid-connected, and exchange of energy modes |
Zhang et al. [30], 2022 | - Electric–hydrogen hybrid refueling stations and DC microgrids - Voltage stability and reliable operation | - Fuzzy logic controller | Fuzzy controller provided optimal power allocation, and its use improved the lithium battery service life and hydrogen safety |
Chamout et al. [31], 2024 | - Requirements of the hydrogen purification - Off-grid household with availability of solar and wind electricity - Component costs and capacities | - A decision algorithm | The purification unit uses a small amount of energy but its operations affect the sizing of the components |
Lyu et al. [32], 2024 | - Global optimality for both sizing and scheduling of microgrid | - Combined solution methodology (Rolling Horizon Optimization and particle swarm optimization) | The method converges within 30 generations and reaches a global satisfactory solution; time-of-day tariff strategy is important |
Sun et al. [33], 2024 | - Operation planning for a microgrid | - A multistage stochastic mixed-integer program - A nested decomposition algorithm based on stochastic dual dynamic integer programming | The planning strategy was shown to have economic benefits and was successful for the seasonal and intraday dynamics of the system |
Zhu et al. [34], 2024 | - Optimal control framework containing energy management, economic optimization, and power regulation | - Distributed economic model predictive control scheme - A mixed-integer nonlinear programming algorithm | Simulations under varying irradiance and load conditions showed the model to be suitable for photovoltaic–hydrogen DC microgrid |
Fang et al. [35], 2022 | - Supply electricity and hydrogen and heating loads - Minimizing operational costs | - Day-ahead energy scheduling and model predictive control | Multiple-timescale energy management was shown to be suitable for multi-energy microgrid |
Dong et al. [36], 2023 | - Hydrogen-based microgrid fuel cell electric buses - Economic feasibility | - A two-stage robust optimization formulation with integer corrective decisions | The proposed energy management solution demonstrates significant improvements over a benchmark method; notably, it reduces mean daily operational costs by 37.08% |
Shen et al. [37], 2022 | - A zero-carbon microgrid | - Capacity planning and operation strategies | Operational reliability and economic feasibility are verified in a village |
K/bidi et al. [38], 2022 | - Solving a unit commitment problem due to different constraints of system components - A multistage power and energy management strategy | - Distributed explicit model predictive control - Mixed-integer quadratic programming | The proposed method is shown to avoid inadequate start-up of fuel cells and electrolyzers |
Fang et al. [39], 2024 | - The electricity–heat–hydrogen supply–demand balance and demand uncertainties | - The day-ahead scheduling stage, model predictive control (intraday rolling stage), and intraday real-time adjustment stage (markets) | Proposed methodology effectively addresses the challenges of balancing electricity, heat, and hydrogen supply and demand, especially in the face of uncertain conditions |
Huangfu et al. [40], 2023 | - Global optimal power distribution scheme - Rule-based judgment for reducing complexity of control | - A subsection bi-objective optimization dynamic programming strategy - A multi-objective genetic algorithm strategy | The solution improved photovoltaic utilization and fuel economy |
Publication | Goals and Aims | Methods and Conditions | Some Results |
---|---|---|---|
Van et al. [45], 2023 | - Energy management strategy for renewable energy microgrid with hydrogen storage system | - A state machine-based strategy combined with a hysteresis band control strategy - Connected to main grid; bidirectional energy exchange is possible | - Balanced supply and demand within the microgrid. - Extended lifespan of electrolyzer and fuel cell. - Maintained appropriate storage levels for battery and hydrogen. |
Bouaouda and Sayouti [46], 2024 | - A framework for microgrid size optimization and performance assessment | - Quantum-based Beluga Whale Optimization | - Simulated microgrid with renewable sources and hydrogen storage. - Demonstrated capability to supply energy to a remote off-grid site. |
Karimi [47], 2024 | - Sustainable scheduling of hybrid hydrogen power systems - Minimize the total costs, carbon emission, and peak load | A stochastic three-objective optimization mode and min-max approach | - Hydrogen tank enhanced system flexibility. Excess renewable energy converted to hydrogen. - Min-max approach increased load factor from 77.22% to 83.48%. |
Abdelghany et al. [48], 2024 | - Energy management strategy for a microgrid with wind–hydrogen strategy - Short-term and long-term operations (load demand, maximize the revenue, minimizing operation costs) | - A hierarchical model predictive control, mixed-logic dynamic framework, and a mixed-integer linear program | - Wind energy surplus converted to hydrogen. - Hydrogen stored for later use. - Hydrogen utilized in grid-islanded and connected operations. |
Wu et al. [49], 2024 | - Energy management for a residential microgrid - Combatting long-term and short-term uncertainty introduced by renewable sources | - Proposed hierarchical on-line energy management for hybrid hydrogen–electricity storage - Operating time: battery storage for every minute and hydrogen storage hourly; the hydrogen energy storage was for long-term, seasonal energy variation. | -Reduced overall energy cost by 21% compared to battery-only system. |
Giovanniello and Wu [50], 2023 | - Sizing components for a microgrid with 100% wind energy (Canada) - Long- and short-term storage | - A mixed-integer linear programming model - Lithium-ion batteries and hydrogen to solve issues in the short and long term | - Hybrid storage reduced costs significantly. - Hybrid storage is more cost-effective than single storage. - Lithium-ion battery costs dominated by energy storage capacity. - Hydrogen system impacted overall microgrid costs. - Lower electrolyzer efficiency significantly increased total microgrid cost. - Improved fuel efficiency primarily reduced total system costs. - Hydrogen system provided less energy than batteries but was crucial during peak demand periods. |
Yousri et al. [27], 2023 | - Minimize the electricity and battery degradation costs, customers’ discomfort, and peak-to-average ratio - In four-scenario testing: good, bad, and average weather scenarios and a forecasted weather profile | - A model for energy management and demand response for hybrid energy storage system consisting of batteries and hydrogen tanks - A multi-objective artificial hummingbird optimizer | - Model increased customer savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions across all scenarios. |
Abdelghany et al. [48], 2024 | - Renewable energy was utilized in hydrogen production - Several hydrogen tanks - Autonomous operation without utility grid - Economic and operational costs, degradation aspects, physical constraints, and demands as well as smoothing variations in renewable energy production | - Model predictive control (also known as hierarchical rolling horizon control) for managing a hydrogen energy storage system in an islanded wind/solar microgrid | - Microgrid capable of independent operation. - Multiple hydrogen tanks enable long-term storage. - System complexity increased with hydrogen storage. - Hydrogen storage might not suffice for extended periods. - System performance validated through laboratory testing. |
Li et al. [51], 2024 | - Increasing safety and stability of large power grids because of uncertainty in energy production using wind and solar - Different storage solutions - Economic costs -Multigrid system | - Distributional robust approximation solving - A combination of the Bonferroni test and Conditional Value at Risk | - Optimal solution: independent hydrogen storage and shared battery storage. - Power transmission between microgrids favored simultaneous storage configuration. - Hydrogen storage investment cost significantly impacted overall costs. |
Deng et al. [52], 2023 | - A multi-microgrid system which shared electric–hydrogen storage - Combination of cooling, heating, and power systems | - Bi-layer optimization configuration model; the upper layer is energy storage capacity issues; the lower level is for multi-microgrid optimization | - Shared storage outperformed individual storage. - Reduced battery capacity by 75.94%. - Decreased daily operating costs by 11.53%. - Hybrid energy storage yielded further improvements. - Increased daily net income by 61.67%. - Reduced battery capacity by an additional 67.13%. - Decreased daily operating costs by 3.39%. - Achieved a payback period of 1.6 years. |
Shi et al. [28], 2023 | - Self-consistent microgrid with hydrogen storage for transportation | - Particle swarm optimization | Storage balances fluctuating wind energy output and enables grid flexibility. |
Qiu et al. [53], 2024 | - Optimal scheduling of microgrids with coordinated long-term and short-term energy storage - Economic optimization | - Mixed-integer linear programming which solved using the Yalmip/Gurobi commercial solver | - Combined battery and hydrogen storage for effective cross-seasonal energy management in microgrids. |
Naseri et al. [54], 2022 | - Controlling an islanded microgrid (stand-alone/off-grid microgrid) - Green hydrogen production, storage, and re-electrification | - Two-layer hierarchical control | Simulation results indicate that green hydrogen production is feasible using solar energy; hydrogen is stored for later electricity generation when sufficient pressure is built up. |
Shao et al. [55], 2023 | - Multi-energy off-grid microgrids for hydrogen - Economics and resilience | - A two-stage risk-constrained stochastic programming; the first stage was about energy resource configuration optimization, and the second stage considers long-term economics and on-emergency feasibility verification - Risk constraints via sampling approximation strategy | Hydrogen storage provides both short-term and seasonal energy storage capabilities, contributing to overall cost reduction. |
Er et al. [56], 2024 | Sizing microgrid for a grid–vehicle–grid approach to minimize the life cycle cost and maximize the system reliability | - Two-stage stochastic programming with a scenario-based approach | - Hybrid storage system most cost-effective with low power supply loss. - Increased power supply loss allowed for more economical solutions. |
Xiang et al. [57], 2021 | - Zero-emission airport operation - Techno-economic benefits | - A mixed-integer linear programming optimization method and life cycle theory | - Hydrogen system reduced annual costs by over 40% and greenhouse gas emissions by over 65%. |
Kumar et al. [58], 2022 | - Stand-alone microgrids (off-grid energy providers) can obtain 100% of their energy from renewables - Use of metal hydride-based hydrogen energy storage system - Optimal sizing of components | - Optimization performed via simulation software HOMER | Hybrid systems typically require smaller storage capacities compared to wind-only microgrid systems. |
Li et al. [59], 2023 | - Analysis of hydrogen energy storage and battery based on the levelized cost of storage, carbon emissions, and uncertainty assessments | - Monte Carlo method | - Hydrogen production using alkaline electrolyzers, pipeline delivery, and refueling demonstrated the lowest cost of 0.227 USD/kWh and CO2 emissions of 61.63 gCO2e/kWh. - Large-scale storage systems yielded comparable results. |
Xu et al. [60], 2024 | - Hydrogen storage for a pumping unit using renewable energy | - Simulations and control strategy | - Stand-alone operation for up to 72 h. - Energy conversion efficiency of 35%. - Proven through real-world implementation. |
Pignataro et al. [61], 2024 | - Modelling a power-to-gas system (synthetic methane using wind energy) | - Management strategy incl. storage - Mathematical modelling | The larger size of storage leads to better performance. |
Abdolmaleki and Berardi [62], 2024 | - Solar and hydrogen energy for a single-house and a midrise apartment | - HOMER software | - Simulated systems: PV–battery, PV–hydrogen, and PV–battery–hydrogen. Best economical configuration: - 522 kW photovoltaic (PV) panels; - 150 kW electrolyzers; - 20 kW fuel cell; - 200 kg hydrogen tank; - 18.6 kW converter; - 159 batteries. |
Liu et al. [63], 2024 | - Design of large-scale hydrogen storage pipeline networks - Costs | - A mixed-integer nonlinear optimization mode - Hybrid genetic algorithm that combines the Modified Feasible Directions Method and Genetic Algorithm Theory | - Investment of the pipeline network is affected by wellhead temperature more than ambient temperature. |
Dong et al. [36], 2023 | - Hydrogen-based microgrid fuel cell electric buses - Economic feasibility | - A two-stage robust optimization formulation with integer corrective decisions | - Hydrogen-based microgrids can serve as operation centers for fuel cell electric buses. - This integration offers economic feasibility and contributes to decarbonization. |
K/bidi et al. [38], 2022 | - Solving a unit commitment problem due different constraints of system components - A multistage power and energy management strategy | - Distributed explicit model predictive control - Mixed-integer quadratic programming | - The proposed method effectively prevents premature and inefficient start-up of fuel cells and electrolyzers. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Miri, M.; Tolj, I.; Barbir, F. Review of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell-Powered Systems for Stationary Applications Using Renewable Energy Sources. Energies 2024, 17, 3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153814
Miri M, Tolj I, Barbir F. Review of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell-Powered Systems for Stationary Applications Using Renewable Energy Sources. Energies. 2024; 17(15):3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153814
Chicago/Turabian StyleMiri, Motalleb, Ivan Tolj, and Frano Barbir. 2024. "Review of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell-Powered Systems for Stationary Applications Using Renewable Energy Sources" Energies 17, no. 15: 3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153814
APA StyleMiri, M., Tolj, I., & Barbir, F. (2024). Review of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell-Powered Systems for Stationary Applications Using Renewable Energy Sources. Energies, 17(15), 3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153814