Next Article in Journal
A Data-Driven Method for Calculating Neutron Flux Distribution Based on Deep Learning and the Discrete Ordinates Method
Next Article in Special Issue
How Much Progress Have We Made towards Decarbonization? Policy Implications Based on the Demand for Electric Cars in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Building a Sustainable Future: A Three-Stage Risk Management Model for High-Permeability Power Grid Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Vehicle Design Considering Quality Level and Life Cycle Environmental Assessment (LCA)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Temperature Reached by the Traction Battery of an Electric Vehicle during the Drying Phase in the Paint Booth

1
Research Department, Electric Vehicle and Mobility Area, Instituto de Investigación Sobre Vehículos, S.A., Ctra. N232, km 273, 50690 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/María de Luna s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(14), 3437; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143437
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 2 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024

Abstract

:
Lithium-ion battery pack performance, safety, and lifespan are significantly influenced by temperature, yet little research has focused on the specific effects of temperature during the drying phase in paint booths. This study aims to analyse how drying temperatures affect battery modules compared to operational conditions (e.g., driving, charging) and to analyse the influence of the battery state of charge on the temperature reached by the traction battery during the drying phase. Various temperature measurement methods, including diagnostic equipment and thermocouples, were employed to conduct tests. Results indicate that the battery pack temperature during the drying phase remains below 60 °C. Comparisons with temperature measurements in other scenarios (e.g., charging, high-temperature parking) show significantly higher temperatures, highlighting the relatively low impact of paint booth drying temperatures on battery thermal management.

1. Introduction

Temperature is a critical factor influencing the safety, cycle lifetime, and performance of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs). Extensive research has focused on how temperature affects the degradation of various LiB components. Studies have examined the degradation of the anode at elevated temperatures [1], the thermal ageing of cathode materials like LiCoO2 and LiMn2O2 [2], and the effects on electrolytes [3]. It has been established that increased degradation rates and decreased state of health (SoH) at higher temperatures are primarily due to changes in electrode surface films and the structure of the LCO electrode [4]. The safe operating temperature range for lithium-ion batteries is typically between 15 °C and 40 °C [5,6] as temperatures above 40 °C can cause significant issues [7,8]. High temperatures can drastically reduce the capacity and lifespan of LiBs, with studies showing a loss of nearly 70% capacity after 500 discharge cycles at 55 °C [9]. This effect greatly shortens the life of LIBs [10]. Failures in lithium-ion batteries can be mechanical, electrical, or thermal, occurring at the cell, module, or battery pack levels [11], potentially leading to Thermal Runaway (TR). Overheating, often due to poor contact connections or excessive heat near the battery pack, is a major concern. High temperatures are also encountered during fast charging and when electric vehicles (EVs) are parked outdoors on hot summer days.
During EV repairs, especially in the paint booth, equipment is used to accelerate the drying process, typically operating from 60 °C to 80 °C for 30 min. While some paint manufacturers have developed products that lower drying temperatures, this usually increases the time the vehicle remains in the booth.
The temperature of lithium-ion batteries must be controlled as it affects their performance, health, and safety. Catastrophic failures sometimes occur due to particularly high excessive temperature variations, which can cause TR leading to fire and consequent explosion. When the separators between the anode and cathode break or melt, the electrodes stop working properly or disappear, and a chemical reaction begins in the lithium that releases oxygen, carbon dioxide, other noxious gases, and a lot of heat. This chemical reaction causes the battery to heat up in a process called TR, a chemical reaction that generates heat and is accelerated by the very temperature it generates, causing it to enter a flashover that often results in fire. The TR is sustained by the heat of the battery, generating more and more heat.
Chemical reactions occur one after the other, forming chain reactions once the temperature increases abnormally under very high mechanical load. The cyclic heat–temperature reaction is the cause of the chain reactions. High heat causes the temperature of the cell to rise, initiating new side reactions, such as the decomposition of SEI (Solid Electrolyte Interphase). These secondary reactions release more heat, thus forming a feedback loop. This cycling at extremely high temperatures continues until the cell undergoes TR.
Lithium batteries can experience TR due to battery defects, battery damage, heat, rapid discharge, or overcharging, resulting in temperatures exceeding 550 °C for lithium-ion batteries and 760 °C for lithium metal batteries. If a single cell generates enough heat for adjacent cells to experience TR, cell-to-cell and module-to-module propagation occurs. TR can result in the release of flammable electrolytes and, in the case of lithium metal, the release of molten and burning lithium.
We can ask ourselves the following question: what could cause a lithium-ion battery in an electric vehicle to burn? A burning battery could be due to overheating or a rupture and leakage of electrolytes. Regarding overheating, under normal conditions, lithium-ion batteries have a protection system that regulates the charge and prevents overheating. When electrolytes rupture and leakage occurs, elements mix and gases are released, which occupy more and more space, generate heat, and crack the battery walls, eventually bursting the battery walls.
On the other hand, operating temperature can also affect the performance of the lithium-ion battery which, over time, will reduce its lifetime.
Most vehicle manufacturers recommend not exceeding a temperature of 60 °C on the battery surface during the drying process for more than 60 min. For this reason, every time an electric or hybrid vehicle drying process is performed, the temperature to which the traction battery is exposed should be controlled and monitored.
Some manufacturers even indicate that the lithium-ion traction battery must be disassembled before the electric vehicle is brought into the paint booth to prevent degradation. Car manufacturers provide procedures to repair electric and hybrid vehicles safely.
Here is what different vehicle manufacturers indicate:
  • BMW i3
BMW states that the maximum permissible temperature in the paint booth must not exceed 80 °C with the high-voltage battery unit mounted in the vehicle. To avoid excessive ageing of the high-voltage battery cells, the dwell time should be a maximum of 60 min [12].
2.
Nissan
For the Nissan Leaf, the following is stated [13]:
To use the paint booth, the outer footboard must be kept at a T ≤ 60 °C to prevent damage to the lithium-ion battery.
NOTES:
-
Measure the temperature with a non-contact thermometer.
-
If there is a cover (resin) over the footboard, it must be removed to measure the temperature.
If the temperature of the outer footboard exceeds 60 °C, remove the lithium-ion battery beforehand and then bring the vehicle into the paint booth. Figure 1 bellow shows the location of the footboard in the Nissan Leaf.
3.
TESLA
The manufacturer Tesla indicates that before placing the vehicle in the drying booth it must remain indoors, i.e., not outside, at a temperature < 35 °C for at least 12 h [15].
Before putting the vehicle into the drying booth if repairs to the thermal system (air conditioning and heating) have not been completed, the 12 V and high voltage battery must be disconnected to prevent these systems from being activated during drying.
Once the Model S, X, and 3 have been painted, they can be put into the drying booth with the high voltage battery installed, provided the following parameters are not exceeded [16]:
-
Maximum drying time: 45 min;
-
Maximum firing temperature: 74 °C.
4.
TOYOTA
Toyota does not indicate specific precautions to be taken when preparing an electric vehicle for introduction into the drying booth, this position is based on the assertion that temperatures capable of damaging the high-voltage battery cannot be reached during drying cycles in a paint booth [17].
5.
HONDA
Honda indicates that high temperatures can damage the high-voltage battery, therefore, during the drying phase in the paint booth, ensure that the temperature does not exceed 65 °C [18,19].
6.
AUDI
Audi states the following for the Audi Q5 with high-voltage battery [20]: The drying time for repairs using commercial, depending on the material and manufacturer, ranges between 30 and 60 min at 60 °C. Audi vehicles with high-voltage batteries are equipped with a robust battery that operates efficiently up to 55 °C. However, the cells can sustain damage if the temperature exceeds 70 °C. To prevent exceeding 70 °C, Audi vehicles should not remain in the paint booth for more than 60 min during drying.
If the materials used for the repair require a drying time longer than 60 min, an alternative drying method, such as infrared rays, must be used.
Additionally, it is important to note that during workshop repair procedures, the high-voltage system must typically be disconnected for safety reasons when working on electric vehicles. Disconnecting the high-voltage system also shuts down the battery cooling system, which could otherwise overheat and be damaged.
High temperatures can impact the service life of traction batteries. It is important to note that, during the vehicle painting process in the final phase (colour + varnish), the varnish typically requires drying in the booth at 60 °C for 30 min, as recommended by several suppliers. Alternatively, another approach is to use a varnish type that can air-dry or be booth-dried at 40 °C, albeit requiring more than 30 min. While effective, this method doubles the drying time, slowing down repairs and reducing overall workshop efficiency.
Audi has also highlighted another potential solution for drying the paintwork of electric vehicles without causing damage or compromising workshop performance: shortwave infrared drying technology. This technology penetrates directly into the substrate surface, whether metal, plastic, or other materials, heating and curing the coating from the inside out, focusing specifically on the painted panels.
In summary, it can be stated that most manufacturers indicate that when an electric vehicle is introduced into a paint booth during the drying phase, it should not exceed 60 °C for more than 60 min. There are exceptions, such as Tesla, which allows 74 °C but for less time (45 min). In other words, if the drying temperature is increased, the time spent in the paint booth must be shorter to avoid degradation and damage to the high-voltage traction battery.
The traction batteries of electric/hybrid vehicles must meet safety requirements, as defined in UN/ECE Regulation No. 100: Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the specific requirements of the electric powertrain. Therefore, these batteries undergo thermal tests as part of these safety requirements that must be fulfilled.
Annex 9 B of Regulation No. 100 specifies the thermal shock and cycle tests to which the battery is subjected. These tests are designed to assess the SAEER’s (Rechargeable Electrical Energy Storage System’s) resistance to abrupt temperature changes. The procedure involves subjecting the battery to a defined number of temperature cycles, starting from ambient temperature and alternating between high- and low-temperature extremes. This simulation replicates the rapid ambient temperature changes that a SAEER may encounter during its operational lifespan.
Before testing the battery, the State of Charge (SoC) must be adjusted by charging it to the maximum SoC specified by the manufacturer for normal operation, ensuring the charging process is completed. If the device being tested does not regulate SoC independently, it should be charged to at least 95% of the maximum SoC defined by the manufacturer for its specific configuration.
Furthermore, all protective devices that could impact the battery’s operation during testing and are relevant to the test results must be active. The battery under test should undergo cooling and heating over multiple cycles. Initially, the battery should be stored for a minimum of six hours at a test temperature of 60 ± 2 °C, or higher if required by the manufacturer. This is followed by a storage period of at least six hours at a test temperature of −40 ± 2 °C, or lower if specified by the manufacturer.
The maximum time interval between the extremes of test temperatures should not exceed 30 min. This operation must be repeated until a minimum of five complete cycles have been conducted. Following these cycles, the tested battery should be stored for 24 h at an ambient temperature of 22 ± 5 °C. After this storage period, a standard cycle, as specified in the Regulation, must be performed. The test concludes with a one-hour observation period under ambient temperature conditions in the test environment.
Nevertheless, comparisons with temperature measurements in other scenarios (e.g., charging, high-temperature parking) show significantly higher temperatures. A more in-depth literature review of VE temperature measurements in other scenarios has been carried out in order to compare them with the results obtained in this work.
Studies have analysed [21] the impact of high ambient temperatures on the efficiency of vehicles travelling in a region of high temperatures (>50 °C) in Kuwait compared to those recorded by Liu et al. [22] (<35 °C). The negative impact of high temperatures on electric vehicle efficiency was observed. Vehicles with excellent thermal management systems can still control temperature even in an extreme environment. However, for vehicles with worse thermal management systems, the situation will be worse. The load curves between −20 °C and 50 °C have been analysed. In the high-temperature charging test at 50 °C, the charging current fluctuates between 32 A and 100 A to control the battery temperature below 40 °C. It is agreed that there is low charging efficiency at extreme temperatures to control the battery temperature to be in a safe range [23].
DC fast charge tests were conducted at different temperatures including tests measuring charge duration, energy transfer, and energy used to thermally regulate the energy storage system (ESS) for charging events at different temperatures: 0, 25, and 50 °C [24]. Fast Charge at 50 °C could not be carried out during the tests to avoid an event, i.e., for safety reasons. It is observed that in the test at 0 °C the maximum temperature reached in the battery is 6.1 °C and in the test at 25 °C the maximum temperature reached in the battery is 27.8 °C.
Battery temperature has a major impact on the charging speed of electric vehicles, which is why most vehicles use a heating system to warm their battery and improve charging time. There are comprehensive analysis reports that help to understand the strategy chosen by each car manufacturer. In this −20 °C fast charge, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Mercedes EQS use coolant heaters to increase the battery temperature by up to 25 °C during charging. The maximum power of the Ioniq 5 heater is 5 kW and the EQS is 8 kW. The Tesla Model S Plaid’s strategy is different, as charging only starts when the battery temperature is above 0 °C and keeps it around 50 °C. The powertrains are used as coolant heaters with a peak power of 12 kW. Additional tests are conducted at −7 °C, 22 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C to understand the thermal management strategy of the high-voltage battery [25].
Given the critical impact of temperature on LiB performance, health, and safety, this study aims to investigate the thermal behaviour of high-voltage battery systems in EVs under various conditions. The primary objectives are to understand how temperature variations during different operational scenarios affect battery performance and to develop effective thermal management strategies.
Motivation and Novelty:
This work is motivated by the need to enhance the safety and efficiency of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles, particularly under extreme temperature conditions encountered during various operational and maintenance scenarios. The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive approach to examining thermal behaviour across a wide range of conditions, including the drying phase in paint booths, battery charging, summer parking, and driving. By employing advanced diagnostic equipment and thermocouple temperature measurements, this research provides detailed insights into temperature trends, compressor performance, and battery module behaviour. These findings will inform the development of improved thermal management systems and safety protocols, ultimately extending the lifespan and reliability of EV batteries.
This study will also address specific gaps in current research by proposing future investigations into the installation of thermocouples in battery modules for continuous temperature monitoring, the effects of seasonal variations on battery temperatures, and the impact of different driving styles on temperature distribution within battery packs. These proposed research avenues aim to deepen our understanding of battery temperature management in diverse operational conditions, contributing to the advancement of electric vehicle technology.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental principles focus on evaluating the thermal impact on the traction battery of a BMW i3 during the drying phase in a paint booth. By leveraging a combination of direct temperature measurements using T-type thermocouples and diagnostic tools connected to the vehicle’s OBD, this study aims to monitor and record the battery’s temperature at different states of charge (SoC). The paint booth conditions are carefully controlled, with the temperature set to 60 °C for 60 min, followed by a ventilation phase, to replicate typical automotive manufacturing and repair processes.
This setup ensures that the thermal response of the battery can be observed under realistic conditions that the vehicle might encounter in a paint booth. The data collected provide insights into the thermal behaviour of the battery cells, highlighting potential hotspots and the effectiveness of the vehicle’s cooling system. This information is critical for assessing the safety and longevity of the battery, as prolonged exposure to high temperatures can accelerate degradation and pose safety risks.
Overall, the experimental procedure combines precise temperature monitoring with controlled environmental conditions to understand the thermal dynamics of EV batteries during manufacturing processes. This approach allows for the identification of optimal operational parameters to ensure battery safety and performance.

2.1. Vehicle Used in the Tests

A BMW i3 60 Ah, Model Year 2013, was used in the tests carried out. The specifications of the battery used in this vehicle are provided below (Table 1).
The different parts of the traction battery of the tested vehicle are shown in Figure 2.
The battery management electronics (SME), which can be seen in Figure 2, continuously monitor the condition of the battery cells and the parameters required for safe battery operation. The SME control unit performs the following functions.
-
Control of the start and stop of the high-voltage system is carried out on request via the Electrical Machine Electronics (EMEs).
-
Evaluation of the voltage and temperature measurement signals of all battery cells and the current level in the high-voltage circuit.
-
Monitoring of the cooling system of the high-voltage battery unit.
-
Determination of the SoC and SoH of the high-voltage battery.
-
Determination of the available power of the high voltage battery.
-
Safety functions (e.g., voltage and temperature monitoring, high voltage interlock loop monitoring, and high voltage system monitoring for insulation faults).
On the other hand, the safety box, which can be seen in Figure 2, includes the following:
1. Switching contactors:
The high-voltage battery is connected to/disconnected from the high-voltage electrical system by two electromechanical contactors that are activated by the SME. A third switching contactor is used for pre-charging: before the electromechanical contactors are switched, the connection to the high-voltage electrical system is checked.
2. Voltage and current sensor at the current path of the negative battery terminal:
A voltage and current sensor measures the voltage and current at the output of the high-voltage battery and at the connection of the high-voltage electrical system. This sensor is connected to the battery management electronics (SME) via a local internal control network.
3. Safety fuse in the current path at the positive terminal of the battery.
4. Heating control electronics (depending on the options installed):
Depending on the equipment, heating may be installed in the high-voltage battery unit. The control electronics are located in the safety box and connected to the voltage and current sensor via the LIN bus.
The SME supplies the cell monitoring circuits with a 5 V supply voltage. A CSC monitors the status of 12 lithium-ion cells (the number of cells in a module):
-
Measuring and monitoring the voltage of each individual cell in the battery.
-
Measuring and monitoring the temperature at various points in the cell block.
-
Communicating the measured variables to the SME.
-
Performing the voltage adjustment process on the battery cells.
The high-voltage battery unit in this vehicle is cooled by coolant. For this reason, the air-conditioning circuit is extended to include the high-voltage battery unit. In the high-voltage battery unit, beneath the cell block, there is an aluminium flat-tube heat exchanger which is connected to the air-conditioning refrigerant circuit.
The following system functions are described for the high-voltage battery unit:
-
Control of the switching contactors for switching the high-voltage system on and off.
-
Monitoring of the high-voltage system for insulation faults.
-
Control of the cooling and heating of the high-voltage battery.
-
Balancing of individual battery cells (balancing).
The start-up of the high-voltage system occurs through the interaction between the EME and SME control units. The EME requests the start of the high-voltage system when Terminal 15 is connected or when there is a request for stationary cooling or charging. This start-up is performed in several stages:
-
High-voltage electrical system check (pre-charge): this involves verifying the operation of the high-voltage electrical system, including closing the pilot line circuit.
-
Voltage increase: Capacitors are present, causing a potential for high switching currents that could lead to damage to both capacitors and switching contactors over time. Therefore, voltage is increased gradually to mitigate this risk.
-
Closing the contacts of the switching contactor: When disconnecting the high-voltage system, a distinction is made between regular disconnection and fast disconnection. During regular disconnection, the protection of the electrical components and the testing of the high-voltage system is stopped. For example, the contacts of the contactor of the electromechanical switch must only be opened once the current level has fallen to a value close to 0 A, otherwise, they are subject to a high voltage.
The BMW i3 vehicle tested features a central control station (Cell Supervision Circuits, CSCs) as seen in Figure 2, overseeing each of the eight modules. The CSC analyzes measurements from temperature sensors (four per module) and monitors the voltages of individual cells. Apart from data collection, the CSC’s primary role involves periodic cell rebalancing using its integrated shunt resistor. This process is essential because battery cells can become slightly unbalanced during use, with some cells reaching lower states of charge and associated open-circuit voltages compared to others. Without rebalancing, relying solely on module voltage to determine charge and discharge limits can result in issues. For instance, during charging, a high state-of-charge (SoC) cell might be overcharged while other cells lag behind in voltage. Conversely, during discharge, a low SoC cell might reach a lower voltage than intended. Overcharging and over-discharging can damage cells, leading to safety concerns or reduced cycle life. Therefore, cell balancing plays a crucial role in maintaining optimal battery function and longevity.
The temperature (T) of the battery is continuously monitored, with the CSC collecting information to relay to the SME. Additionally, the CSC performs cell rebalancing using an integrated shunt resistor.
The temperature sensors are identified by two wires each. Figure 3 shows the locations of the four T-sensors in each module. To create a larger electrical unit with higher voltage, typically called a module, a specific number of cells are connected in series.
In the traction battery of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the tests, each module contains twelve 60 Ah prismatic cells (refer to Figure 4). To prevent short circuits between cells or between a cell and its housing, the cell assemblies are encased in round structures. The components are then electrically interconnected using a top-mounted cell contact system (CCS) (2). Aluminium side plates and outer plates are added, along with a lid and a bottom plate (7), specifically designed to dissipate heat from the cells. Due to the tendency of lithium-ion cells to expand during operation, which can impact performance, measures are taken to prevent this expansion. The outer plates (6) are press-fitted and secured by the side plates (5). Additionally, multiple temperature sensors are strategically placed around the module, as depicted in Figure 3, to monitor cell temperatures. Accurate temperature readings are crucial for the control system. Once these components are assembled, the module is ready for integration into a storage system.

2.2. Paint Booth Used in the Tests

The paint booth (Figure 5 and Figure 6) used in the tests is supplied by SAICO, model KL/78, and is equipped with a TRONIC control panel. The AZ-20 burner employed is a diesel burner, with a minimum power of 128 kW and a maximum power of 249 kW (equivalent to 112,000 and 214,000 Kcal, respectively). It consumes fuel nominally at a rate of from 6.9 to 15 kg/h. To initiate the drying phase in the paint booth, the temperature controller is adjusted to the desired temperature, typically set at 60 °C for vehicle repair applications. The heating timer for the drying phase is then adjusted by turning it clockwise until the indicator aligns with the set drying time. For instance, if the drying time is 30 min, the timer should be set to 40 min because the temperature (T) does not instantly reach the set value.
Following this, the ventilation timer is adjusted for the drying phase. The ventilation time should exceed the heating time to ensure effective cooling of both the system and the vehicle or painted part.
It is important to note that, for a drying temperature of 60 °C, the recommended cooling time is 10 min.
Refer to the following regarding the operation of the booth during the drying phase:
-
After setting the heating timer to 40 min, the ventilation timer should be set to 50 min to ensure adequate cooling.
-
To initiate the drying phase, both the heating and ventilation timers should be activated simultaneously by pressing the switches located at the centre of each timer.
-
Then, the drying phase starts.
The dimensions of the paint booth are given below:
-
Floor plan: Inner dimensions: length 7080 mm, width 4280 mm
     External dimensions: length 7320 mm, width 4520 mm
-
Plenum height (upper ceiling where heat is distributed). External dimensions: length 7420 mm, width 4520 mm.
-
Height: Inside 3080 mm
     Outside 3630 mm
-
As for the enclosure of the cabin, the walls are made of 20/11 mm glass and the floor has 40 × 2 mm gratings in 2 shafts.
-
The generator group (heating booster) is made up of two 5.5 kW three-phase asynchronous electric motors and two fans, with a total airflow of 24,000 m3/h. On the other hand, the extractor group (expulsion scrubber), is made up of two three-phase 5.5 kW electric motors, with a suction airflow of 22,500 m3/h.

2.3. Equipment Used for Temperature Measurement

To measure the temperature of the battery, temperature-measuring equipment has been used, consisting of the following:
-
Keysight 970A Datalogger (see Figure 7) measures, records, and stores data, together with a 20-channel acquisition module. This data logger can also read/store electrical variables by changing the type of recording module.
-
Includes visualization and recording software: BenchVue. 2020 Update 2.0.
-
Panel for 12 T-type mini-thermocouples.
The following Figure 8 shows a screenshot of the BenchVue software screen:
It also includes a panel for 12 class 1 (±0.5 °C accuracy) mini-T-type thermocouples and a box for screwing them inside the paint booth and has a corrugated tube for conducting them. T-type thermocouples up to 100 °C give good accuracy. They have a 4-m cable so that we can measure inside the climatic chamber.
T-type thermocouples are placed on the surface to be measured, have a 4-m cable (see Figure 9), and are then placed in the thermocouple connection panel, which has a 4-m cable to the datalogger, allowing the data extraction equipment to be located outside the cabin during the tests.

2.4. Characterisation of the Tests Carried Out

The objective of this study is to measure the temperature experienced by the battery modules when the vehicle is in the paint booth (according to the manufacturer’s specifications) during the drying phase.
After conducting the tests, these temperature values will be compared with those experienced by the battery in other scenarios:
-
During charging: analyzing the impact of charging speed based on power and charger specifications and assessing how the state of charge influences temperature.
-
In different driving situations and vehicle stresses.
-
When the electric vehicle is parked outside during the summer, exposed to elevated ambient temperatures.
To carry out the test, it is necessary to measure the temperature of the paint booth, on the one hand, the temperature indicated on the thermometer in the booth itself has been noted, and, on the other hand, the temperature and relative humidity inside the booth have been measured by placing a thermometer inside the booth.
Additionally, temperature measurements were taken at points on the bodywork near the location of the battery, specifically in the lower area and around the footboard. A thermographic camera was used for this purpose.
The battery temperature was measured using diagnostic equipment. In the specific case of the BMW i3 vehicle used for the tests, the diagnostic equipment allows us to measure the temperature in four modules of the battery. At various intervals between 0 and 90 min with intervals of 15 min, the temperature was measured at the four points of the battery, it was established that if at any point the temperature measured in the battery exceeded 60 °C, the test would be interrupted.
These measurements were carried out at different battery states of charge to also analyse the influence of the battery state of charge on the temperature reached by the traction battery.
To measure the battery temperature, we will use the following measurement methods:
-
BMW diagnostic equipment, which is connected to the vehicle’s OBD (Onboard Diagnostics). With this device, individual temperatures, and voltages of individual modules, can be measured, i.e., eight temperature measurements can be obtained.
-
Multibrand TEXA diagnostic equipment, which connects to the vehicle’s OBD. With this diagnostic equipment we can obtain, in the case of the BMW i3 tested, an average battery temperature value (see Figure 10), even though the battery, as we have seen in the analysis of its specifications and components, has a CSC for each of the eight modules.
-
Temperature-measuring equipment, using T-type thermocouples.
For the test, the vehicle contact is activated. The battery is charged to 100% SoC in the first tests, but then the tests are repeated with the battery charged to 50% SoC.
Regarding the programming of the temperature in the paint booth during drying, we consider what BMW states: “the maximum permissible temperature in the paint booth must not exceed 80 °C with the high-voltage battery unit fitted. To avoid excessive ageing of the high-voltage battery cells, the dwell time should be a maximum of 60 min”, and what the paint supplier indicates is not to exceed 60 °C for more than 60 min.
As for the paint booth schedule, considering the indications of BMW and the paint supplier, the maximum test levels are set at 60 °C and 60 min.

3. Results

The results obtained using different methods to measure the temperature in the traction battery of the electric vehicle BMW i3 are shown below.

3.1. Temperature Measurement Using BMW Diagnostic Equipment

The data are obtained by connecting the BMW diagnostic machine to the OBD of the BMW i3 vehicle (see Figure 11). The software used is BMW ISTA (Integrated Service Technical Application) 4.39.20. ISTA consists of several components designed to communicate with each other via LAN, WLAN, and Internet. The entire system provides up-to-date information and diagnostic data from BMW headquarters. It is an important diagnostic tool, offering various options for vehicle identification, searching for very specific information and guided troubleshooting.
The customer software is installed on devices with Integrated Service Information Display (ISID) and on the workshop PC.
The following Figure 12 shows two images of the BMW i3 inside the paint booth:
And Figure 13 shows two moments during the tests:
The test is carried out with the BMW i3 vehicle connected, as the ignition of the vehicle must be switched on for the diagnostic machine to connect. The machine is connected to the OBD II (On Board Diagnostics) connector.
The paint booth is programmed to 60 °C for 60 min. As the paint booth takes approximately 60 min to reach 60 °C, we then extend this by a further 60 min. The booth is then programmed to reach 80 °C, but it does not reach 80 °C, the maximum temperature reached is 65 °C.
The paint booth controls the temperature by means of a probe located in the central part of the roof, as shown in the picture (Figure 14). On the other hand, the temperature inside the cabin and the humidity are measured with an EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter (Figure 15), which is programmed to measure every minute. It is placed inside the cabin with support to measure the evolution of the temperature and humidity, as well as the dew point (Dew Point °C), over time.
An HTI 03 THERMAL IMAGER (120 × 90) thermal imaging camera (see Figure 16) was used to measure the temperature at various points on the bodywork near the location of the high-voltage battery, specifically in the lower area of the vehicle and in the footboard area.
The four points to be measured using the HTI 03 THERMAL IMAGER thermographic camera (120 × 90) are shown below (see Figure 17).
To measure the temperature in the footboard area, the outer plastic must first be removed (see Figure 18).
The results of the measurements for different battery states of charge are shown below, firstly for a 50% SoC and then for a 100% SoC.

3.1.1. Battery 50% SoC

In the first test conducted with BMW diagnostic equipment, the high voltage battery has a displayed SoC of 49.9%, however, upon checking the actual state of charge recorded by the BMW diagnostic equipment, it is 35.20%. This discrepancy is intended to provide greater security and peace of mind to the driver. The following image (Figure 19) displays the state of charge value of the battery obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment.
At the beginning of the test, the state of charge of the high-voltage battery cooling system’s shut-off valve is closed, and the average cell temperature is 11 °C, as indicated in the following image (Figure 20).
The following image (Figure 21) displays the temperature and voltage reading for each of the high-voltage battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment.
Below is a graph (Figure 22) depicting the temperature and humidity levels inside the paint booth during the test. These measurements were recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter positioned inside the booth.
The temperature was also measured at various points on the body of the BMW i3 vehicle using a thermal imaging camera (Figure 23), as outlined in the preceding section.
For the analysis of different SoCs, specifically 50% SoC, four tests have been defined. First is the reference test, which is performed by programming the cabin temperature to 60 °C for the first 60 min, then it is measured again at 60 °C after a further 60 min, then it is programmed at 80 °C and the measurement is taken after 60 min, and the measurement is taken again after a further 35 min.
A table with the defined tests to be carried out is given below (Table 2).
The following pictures (Figure 24) display the thermal imaging camera images capturing measurements at the four designated points, as defined in the previous section.
In the images (Figure 24, Figure 25, Figure 26 and Figure 27) it can be observed that the areas reaching the highest temperatures are the footboard areas. Additionally, it is evident that the highest temperatures are reached in the last test, corresponding to when the cabin temperature reaches its peak.
The following Table 3 shows the grouped temperatures obtained at the four measurement points defined on the bodywork for the four tests carried out.
By examining all temperature values in Table 3, several conclusions can be drawn. Test 4 consistently recorded the highest temperature values compared to the reference test. Moreover, the area that consistently reached the highest temperature is the right-hand side rear area (relative to the vehicle’s direction of travel).
Finally, Table 4 below presents the temperature data for each individual module, obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment.
The analysis of the data in Table 4 confirms that Modules 1 and 8 consistently reach the highest temperatures across all tests. These modules correspond to the first and last positions in the battery pack.
The following graph (Figure 28) shows the temperature at the various measuring points on the bodywork.
The graph above (Figure 28) indicates that, as the paint booth temperature increases and the duration of the measurement test extends, the temperature at various points measured on the bodywork also rises. On the other hand, across all tests conducted, the highest temperatures were consistently recorded at the footboard in the rear area, relative to the direction of travel of the vehicle. Notably, temperatures in the footboard area are higher than in the lower part, which is likely influenced by the presence of a cooling plate situated between the measurement point and the high-voltage battery.
Below is a graph (Figure 29) of the temperature in the individual modules of the traction battery obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment.
The graph above (Figure 29) demonstrates that, similarly to the temperature measured at different points on the bodywork, as the temperature within the paint booth and the duration of the test increase, the temperature within the different modules also increases. Across all tests conducted, Modules 1 and 8 consistently exhibit the highest temperatures, followed by Module 5. Interestingly, in Test 4, none of the modules exceeded 30 °C due to active cooling initiated by the opening of the cooling valve.
Analysing the placement of the modules within the traction battery, it is evident that modules located at the ends—specifically Module 1, Module 8, and Module 5—consistently reach the highest temperatures.
The following Figure 30 illustrates the positioning of the individual modules within the traction battery, by giving each of them a number (from 1 to 8).

3.1.2. Battery 100% SoC

The same test as in the previous section is repeated, but, in this case, the battery is at 100% SoC. The objective is to analyse how the SoC influences the temperature of the battery when introduced into the paint booth during the drying phase. Data are obtained by connecting the BMW diagnostic equipment to the OBD II of the BMW i3 vehicle. The test requires the ignition of the vehicle to be switched on, as this is necessary to connect the diagnostic equipment to the OBD II (On Board Diagnostics).
Similar to the previous test, the paint booth is programmed to maintain a temperature of 60 °C for 60 min. Since it takes approximately 60 min for the booth to reach 60 °C, an additional 60 min is added for a new measurement. Subsequently, the booth is programmed to reach the manufacturer-specified 80 °C, but it reaches a maximum of 67 °C.
As in the previous test, the temperature and humidity inside the booth are measured using an EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter.
In the second test with the BMW diagnostic equipment, the high voltage battery displays 100% SoC, however, upon checking the actual state of charge recorded by the BMW diagnostic equipment, it shows 70.10% (see Figure 31). This discrepancy ensures greater security and peace of mind for the driver.
At the beginning of the test, the state of the battery shut-off valve of the high-voltage battery cooling system is closed, and the average cell temperature is 11 °C.
Below is Figure 32, displaying the temperature and humidity of the paint booth during the test, recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter placed inside the booth.
The reason it starts at 49 °C is because, after warming up for 50 min, 10 min to 60 min, the thermometer was switched on. At 9.40 h (53 °C), the temperature drops because we are alerted by the BMW technician who arrives later, and we turn off the cabin. By 9.55 h, we switched on the paint booth, but, since the door was open to connect the equipment to the OBD, the temperature continued to drop to 32 °C (10.11 h). From there, we started warming up again for 60 min. We took a temperature measurement, and it was 56 °C, we continued heating at 60 °C for another 60 min, reaching 58.5 °C.
When the temperature in the cabin was 56 °C (at 11:21 h), the temperature in each module was as shown in the figure below (Figure 33).
The highest temperature is reached in Module 1, which is 25.0 °C. After 60 min, at 12:26 h, the temperature in the cabin is 58.5 °C, and the temperature of each module is as shown in Figure 34 below.
At 12:31 h, the shut-off valve of the compressor cooling system, which cools the battery, is open, with a maximum cell temperature of 32.99 °C, Figure 35.
However, the temperature of the modules does not decrease but continues to increase, as can be seen in the following, Figure 36.
It is confirmed that the compressor responsible for cooling the high-voltage battery is not operational; however, upon inspection, it is noted that the fan is operational. It is unusual that the compressor is not activating despite the fan running. Subsequently, the temperature of the coolant in the inverter is measured and found to be 41.13 °C. This elevated temperature triggers the fan, which cools the coolant circulating through the inverter, the load module, and the electrical machine, Additionally, it cools the condenser that manages the air-conditioning gas. The coolant pump, responsible for cooling all high-voltage components (inverter, electrical machine, converter…) excluding the high-voltage battery, is operational. This measurement of the inverter coolant temperature is conducted because the fan was observed to be running at maximum speed, and the objective is to verify if the fan activation is due to excessive temperature in the inverter. After checking, it was found that the compressor does not receive voltage or current. Using a thermographic camera, the temperature of the compressor was measured at 54.4 °C. It is deduced that the compressor remains inactive because it has reached a high temperature that could potentially cause damage. As a safety precaution, the system prevents the compressor from operating, as starting it could further increase its temperature.
Subsequently, the fault memory was read, revealing a fault code (IHKA 801251 Electric air conditioning compressor: switch-off due to start-up phase errors). This code indicates that the electric compressor of the air-conditioning unit (EKK) may have encountered an overtemperature condition. After ruling out other potential causes, such as excessive refrigerant pressure in the coolant circuit, a defective refrigerant shut-off valve, or mechanical issues in the EKK, it can be concluded that the fault code was triggered due to the detection of overtemperature in the EKK. By 13:12 h, the temperature in the paint booth had risen to 65 °C, and the temperature of each module continued to increase. Attempts to activate the compressor using both BMW’s diagnostic equipment and TEXA’s diagnostic equipment were unsuccessful. At 13:20 h, the final measurement was taken with the paint booth temperature at 67 °C, prompting the test to be stopped for safety reasons as the temperatures in the battery cells were still rising. The temperatures reached in each of the modules are detailed below (Figure 37).
It is then cooled by air until it reaches a temperature of 55.5 °C. It is confirmed that the compressor is activated at 13:45 h when the compressor temperature reaches 35.0 °C (Figure 38). When the compressor is activated, the shut-off valve of the cooling system closes.
A table with the defined tests that have been conducted is given below (Table 5).
The following images (Figure 39 and Figure 40) display the result of the measurements at the four measurement points defined above.
The temperature reached in the compressor is then measured to check its operation during Test 2 (Figure 41).
After 43 min, the third test is stopped to check the temperature of the modules and the compressor, which are found to be still rising, so the test is stopped for measurement and assessment.
The following images (Figure 42) display the result of the measurements at the four measurement points defined above.
The temperature reached in the compressor is then measured to check its operation during Test 3 (Figure 43).
After 10 min, the fourth test is stopped as the compressor still does not work and so the test is stopped for safety reasons.
The following images (Figure 44) display the result of the measurements at the four measurement points defined above.
The temperature reached in the compressor is then measured to check its operation during Test 4 (Figure 45).
At this point, the compressor is cooled with air until it reaches 35 °C and starts to operate, as mentioned earlier.
In the previous images (Figure 39, Figure 40, Figure 42 and Figure 44), it can be observed that the footboard areas reach the highest temperatures. It is also evident that the highest temperatures were reached in the last test, coinciding with the highest cabin temperature.
The compressor temperature was observed to rise to 60.3 °C, after which it was cooled with air and its temperature began to decrease.
Below is Table 6, which displays the temperatures recorded at the four designated measurement points on the bodywork across the four conducted tests.
Finally, Table 7 presents the temperature data for the individual modules, obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment.
The following graph (Figure 46) illustrates the temperature at various measuring points on the bodywork.
The graph above (Figure 46) illustrates that, as the paint booth temperature increases and the duration of the measurement test extends, the temperature at various points on the bodywork increases, similar to observations with a 50% SoC battery. Additionally, in each test conducted, the footboard area in the rear exhibits the highest temperatures, depending on the vehicle’s direction of travel. Notably, temperatures in the footboard area surpass those in the lower part, potentially due to the presence of a cooling plate between the measurement point and the high-voltage battery.
Below is a graph (Figure 47) of the temperature reading from individual modules of the traction battery obtained using BMW diagnostic equipment.
The graph above illustrates that, as the temperature inside the paint booth increases over the course of each test, the temperature recorded in the traction battery modules also rises. Modules 1 and 8 consistently show the highest temperatures across all tests, with module 5 following closely behind.
Notably, in Test 3, Modules 1, 4, 5, 7, and 8 exceed 32 °C. Similarly, in Test 4, all modules surpass this temperature threshold. This is attributed to the compressor’s non-operation due to overtemperature conditions, preventing effective cooling as previously discussed.
The following figures (Figure 48 and Figure 49) will provide a comparative analysis of temperature values recorded at various bodywork measurement points and in the traction battery modules across different states of charge (SoCs) of the battery.
The two graphs above (Figure 48 and Figure 49) depict the following observations:
-
Across all states of charge (SoCs) of the battery, Modules 1 and 8 consistently reach the highest temperatures, followed closely by Module 5.
-
Regardless of the SoC, the temperature measured at the right side footboard in the rear area (T4) is consistently higher than that in the lower part. This difference is likely due to the presence of a cooling plate located between the measurement point and the lower section of the high-voltage traction battery.
-
The temperature trends in the traction battery modules remain consistent irrespective of the battery’s SoC. Modules 1 and 8 consistently exhibit the highest temperatures.
-
Modules generally reach higher temperature values when the battery is at 100% SoC. Specifically, the temperature increase from 50% SoC to 100% SoC is most pronounced in Test 1, with subsequent tests showing reduced temperature differences. Test 4, in particular, shows lower temperature increases compared to Test 1, likely due to the operation of the cooling system during tests 3 and 4 at 50% SoC.
-
It is important to note that the compressor has a temperature limit: above 35 °C, it will not operate due to safety precautions aimed at preventing cell temperatures from exceeding 32 °C. This limitation ensures safe operation even when the vehicle is subjected to conditions such as those in a paint booth.

3.2. Temperature Measurement Using TEXA Multi-Brand Diagnostic Equipment

In the following tests, data are collected using the TEXA multi-brand diagnostic equipment connected to the OBD port of the BMW i3 vehicle. The diagnostic software, IDC5 76.5.0.a-31, facilitates comprehensive communication among its components via LAN, WLAN, and the Internet. This system provides real-time diagnostic information and data, offering various functionalities such as vehicle identification, detailed information searches, and guided troubleshooting. It automatically scans diagnosable electronic control units (ECUs), records parameters and errors during dynamic test drives, and instantly links error readings to corresponding components on wiring diagrams. The TEXA equipment enables the calculation of mean temperature (Tmean) as well as the recording of maximum temperature (Tmax) and minimum temperature (Tmin) values reached within the battery pack. Concurrently, temperature measurements are obtained using thermocouples placed in each module of the battery pack. The positioning of the thermocouples is determined based on the location of the temperature sensors identified in the system. While the measurements are conducted using the TEXA equipment, simultaneous readings are also taken using thermocouples positioned within each module of the battery pack. Prior to placing the thermocouples, the specific locations for temperature sensors are identified (Figure 50).
The test is performed with the BMW i3 vehicle powered on, as the vehicle’s ignition must remain active to enable connectivity for both TEXA and BMW diagnostic equipment via the OBD II connector (Onboard Diagnostics) (see Figure 51). All other test conditions remain consistent with those employed in tests conducted using BMW diagnostic equipment.
When placing the thermocouples on the modules and on the compressor, they are insulated to avoid problems, as it is verified that the housing of each cell is connected to the positive terminal.

3.2.1. Placement of Thermocouples in Traction Battery

First, the high-voltage battery of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested is dismantled. The procedure indicated by the manufacturer is followed as shown below (Figure 52).
The following images (Figure 53) show where the thermocouples have been placed in each of the modules, following the numbering established by BMW so that they correspond with the readings made by the BMW equipment and can be compared. The wiring has been routed along the same path as the rest of the cables and taken out through the relief valve hole after disassembling and removing the relief valve, as can be seen in the images.
The following Figure 54 illustrates the positioning of the individual modules within the traction battery, by giving each of them a number (from 1 to 8) taking into account the numbering provided by the manufacturer:
The thermocouples have been positioned according to the arrangement used by BMW to ensure that the numbering of the measurements taken with the thermocouples corresponds to those taken by the BMW equipment. Below is an image (Figure 55) showing the aperture through which the wiring of the thermocouples placed in the traction battery is routed out.
The following images (Figure 56) show the battery being reassembled after placing the thermocouples on each of the battery modules.
To visualize the temperature data measured with the thermocouples, the thermocouples are connected to the connection panel and then the datalogger is connected to a computer running the Keysight BenchVue program. This setup allows visualization of the temperature data recorded by the thermocouples placed on each of the traction battery modules and the thermocouple placed on the compressor. This program enables the configuration of temperature data recording; the temperature from all nine channels is recorded every 30 s for one hour and the recorded data are exported in Excel format.

3.2.2. Battery SoC 50%

In the initial test conducted using the TEXA multi-brand diagnostic equipment, the high-voltage battery displayed an SoC of 50.0%.
Below is Figure 57, a graph depicting the temperature and humidity inside the paint booth during the test, recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter placed inside the paint booth.
Despite the continuous heating process, the previous graph shows occasional temperature drops at different intervals. These occur when the cabin door is opened for inspections, causing temporary cooling before resuming the heating process.
Similar to tests conducted using BMW diagnostic equipment, temperatures are also measured at various points on the bodywork of the BMW i3 vehicle using a thermal imaging camera. For analysis across different states of charge, specifically at 50% SoC, four tests are defined. Initially, the reference test sets the paint booth temperature to 60 °C for the first 60 min, followed by a temperature check at 60 °C after an additional 60 min. Subsequently, the booth temperature is set to 80 °C, with measurements taken again after 60 min and another 60 min interval. A table with the defined tests to be carried out is given below (Table 8).
The following image (Figure 58) display the measurements obtained at the four designated points.
The temperature of the compressor is subsequently measured to verify its operation during Test 1 (Figure 59).
The following image (Figure 60) display the measurements obtained at the four designated points.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 2 (Figure 61).
The following image (Figure 62) display the measurements obtained at the four designated points.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 3 (Figure 63).
The following image (Figure 64) display the measurements obtained at the four designated points.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 4 (Figure 65).
The following Table 9 shows the temperatures recorded at the four measurement points on the bodywork and the temperature on the compressor, for the four tests conducted.
Additionally, Table 10 below displays the Tmax, Tmin, and Tmean temperatures of the battery pack, obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment.
Below (Figure 66) are snapshots of the measurements taken with the TEXA diagnostic equipment during the tests.
Finally, Table 11 below presents the temperature data for each of the traction battery modules and the compressor, obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment.
Figure 67 displays the temperature at various measuring points on the bodywork.
The graph above (Figure 67) illustrates that, as the temperature inside the paint booth increases and the duration of the measurement test extends, the temperature at different points on the bodywork also increases, similar to the results obtained with the BMW equipment. Additionally, each test reveals that the highest temperature is consistently recorded at the front footboard area, depending on the vehicle’s travel direction. In contrast, the BMW equipment test showed the highest temperature at the rear footboard area. In both tests, it is observed that temperatures in the footboard area are higher than in the lower part, possibly due to the presence of a cooling plate between the measuring point and the high-voltage battery.
Figure 68 displays the temperature readings from each of the traction battery modules obtained using temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples).
The graph above (Figure 68) illustrates that, similarly to the temperature measured at different points on the bodywork, as the temperature inside the paint booth increases and the duration of the measurement test extends, the temperature in the different modules also increases. Furthermore, in each of the tests conducted, it is evident that Modules 1 and 8 consistently reach the highest temperatures, followed by Module 5.
During this test, the cooling valve remained closed throughout as none of the module temperatures exceeded 32 °C.
Since the mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures of the battery pack for each test were measured using TEXA diagnostic equipment, these temperatures will be compared with those obtained from thermocouple measurements (Table 12).
The following graph (Figure 69) illustrates how the temperature measurements with thermocouples yield lower values compared to those obtained with TEXA diagnostic equipment. There is a notable difference in both maximum and minimum temperature measurements.

3.2.3. Battery SoC 100%

In the second test conducted with the TEXA multi-brand diagnostic equipment, the high-voltage battery displayed an SoC of 100.0%.
Below is a graph (Figure 70) illustrating the temperature and humidity inside the paint booth during the test, recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD temperature meter placed inside the paint booth.
Similar to tests conducted with the BMW diagnostic equipment, temperature readings were taken at various points on the BMW i3 vehicle’s bodywork using a thermal imaging camera. For analysis at different states of charge, in this instance, 100% SoC, four tests were defined. These include the initial reference test where the paint booth temperature was set at 60 °C for the first 60 min, followed by a second measurement at 60 °C after an additional 60 min. Subsequently, the booth temperature was raised to 80 °C, with a measurement taken after 60 min, and again after an extra 33 min, due to the maximum temperature reaching 36.0 °C in this final test leading to a safety stoppage. A table with the defined tests to be conducted is given below (Table 13).
The following image (Figure 71) depict the results of the measurements at the four designated points mentioned above, across the test 1 conducted.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 1 (Figure 72).
The following image (Figure 73) depict the results of the measurements at the four designated points mentioned above, across the test 2 conducted.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 2 (Figure 74).
The following image (Figure 75) depict the results of the measurements at the four designated points mentioned above, across the test 3 conducted.
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 3 (Figure 76).
After 33 min, the fourth test is stopped for safety as the maximum temperature measurement of the battery pack reaches 36.0 °C. The results of the temperature measurement at the four defined body points after 33 min are shown below (Figure 77).
The temperature of the compressor is then measured to verify its operation during Test 4 (Figure 78).
After stopping the test and checking the compressor temperature, the access door to the paint booth is opened for cooling. After 5 min, the compressor temperature is rechecked, and it has decreased to 38.1 °C (Figure 79).
From this point onward, the compressor begins to be cooled with air until it reaches 35 °C and starts operating after the vehicle has been put into READY mode.
Additionally, Table 14 displays the temperatures obtained at the four defined measurement points on the bodywork and the temperature on the compressor, for the four tests conducted with a 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Additionally, Table 15 shows the Tmax, Tmin and Tmean temperatures of the battery pack, obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment.
Finally, Table 16 displays the temperature data of the modules and in the compressor, obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment.
Figure 80 displays the temperature at various measurement points on the bodywork.
The graph above (Figure 80) illustrates that, as the paint booth temperature and the duration of the measurement test increase, the temperature at different points on the bodywork also rises, similar to the findings in the test conducted with BMW diagnostic equipment. Moreover, in each test conducted, the highest temperature is consistently observed at the footboard in the front area, depending on the vehicle’s direction of travel. Conversely, in tests conducted with BMW diagnostic equipment, the highest temperature point is at the footboard in the rear area. Both tests conclude that temperatures in the footboard area are higher than in the lower parts, possibly due to the cooling plate located between the measurement point and the high-voltage battery.
Figure 81 depicts the temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained with the temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples).
The graph below (Figure 81) demonstrates that, similarly to the temperature measurements at various points on the bodywork, as the paint booth temperature and test duration increase, temperatures in the different modules also rise. Additionally, in each test conducted, Modules 1 and 8 consistently exhibit the highest temperatures, followed by Module 5.
Another observation is the increasing temperature disparity among the modules as the paint booth temperature rises. For instance, during Test 1 (first 60 min), when the booth reached the programmed temperature based on ambient conditions, nearly all modules exhibited similar temperatures (between 17.7 °C and 19.2 °C). During this test, the compressor was only activated towards the end of the final test, Test 4, triggered by one of the modules reaching 32 °C (measured with the thermocouple).
As the mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures of the battery pack for each test were measured using TEXA diagnostic equipment, they will be compared against temperatures obtained from thermocouple measurements (Table 17).
The following graph (Figure 82) shows how the temperature measurement using thermocouples gives a smaller value than the measurement made using the TEXA diagnostic equipment. There is a greater disparity in the maximum temperature measurement and a larger difference in the lower temperature tests.
The following graphs (Figure 83 and Figure 84) compare the temperature values reached at the different measurement points on the bodywork and on the different modules of the traction battery, measured using TEXA diagnostic equipment and thermocouples, for the different battery SoCs analysed.
The two graphs (Figure 83 and Figure 84) above show the following:
-
Irrespective of the battery SoC, Modules 1 and 8 consistently reach the highest temperatures, followed by Module 5.
-
On the other hand, regardless of the SoC of the battery, a higher temperature is always reached at the right-side footboard in the front area (T3) than at the bottom, which may be due to the existence of a cooling plate at the bottom. This difference may be due to the presence of a cooling plate at the bottom, which is positioned between the measuring point and the underside of the high-voltage traction battery.
-
Regarding the temperature reached in the traction battery modules, the trend is the same regardless of the SoC of the battery, i.e., the modules that reach the highest temperature are Module 8 and Module 1.
-
It is concluded that the modules reach higher temperature values when the battery has an SoC of 100%. The temperature increases at 100% SoC compared to 50% SoC is higher in Test 3 and lower in Test 4. These tests are not influenced by the cooling system because it does not come into operation until the end of Test 4.
The following graphs (Figure 85) compare the temperatures measured using TEXA (mean, maximum, and minimum temperature of the battery pack) for each test at different SoC levels (50% and 100%), with the temperatures obtained from the mean temperatures in each module using thermocouples. In other words, the mean, maximum, and minimum temperature of the battery pack are derived from temperature measurements in each module taken with thermocouples, and these values are compared with those obtained using TEXA equipment.
Analysing the two graphs above (Figure 85), the same trend can be observed in the measurements obtained with the TEXA equipment as with the thermocouples. The various conclusions that can be drawn from this comparison are as follows:
-
The temperatures measured with the TEXA equipment are generally slightly higher than those measured with the thermocouples placed on the battery modules.
-
In the case of the thermocouple measurements, a linear difference of these measurements is observed across different battery SoCs, whereas, with the TEXA measurements, the difference is not linear.
-
The warm-up time is not considered because in each test it is stopped when the compressor starts running and begins to cool down, and what is being measured is the temperature reached at different points to check whether the maximum safety thresholds are exceeded.
-
For both measurement methods (TEXA and thermocouples) the difference between the Tmax, Tmin, and Tmean values for different SoC values is highest for Test 3 and lowest for Test 4.
In the following graphs (Figure 86), temperatures measured in each of the modules are compared, on one hand, with the BMW diagnostic equipment and, on the other hand, with the temperature measurement equipment using thermocouples, for each test carried out at different SoC levels (50% and 100%).
Analysing the two graphs above (Figure 86), we observe a similar trend in the measurements obtained with BMW diagnostic equipment compared to those with thermocouples. Several conclusions drawn from this comparison are outlined below:
-
In the case of the battery at 100% state of charge, the temperatures measured in each module using BMW diagnostic equipment are higher compared to those measured with thermocouples. Both sets of measurements exhibit a consistent trend: Module 8 consistently reaches the highest temperature, followed by Module 1 and Module 5 (in tests 2, 3, and 4). However, this trend was not observed in Test 1, because the spray booth had not yet reached 60 °C during that test.
-
Another conclusion drawn from the measurements with the thermocouples is that, for the two battery SoCs analysed, there is a more uniform and progressive distribution of the measurements across different tests. In contrast, measurements with BMW diagnostic equipment show a less uniform distribution. Specifically, data from test number 3 and test number 4 are very close for the two battery-charging SoCs analysed.
-
In the case of the measurement conducted using BMW diagnostic equipment, the observed temperature differences for each battery state of charge during the tests were significantly larger compared to the temperature differences measured using thermocouples placed on each of the traction battery modules.
From all the above conclusions, it follows that the measurement with the thermocouples is much more accurate than the measurements with the BMW diagnostic equipment, this may be due to the position of the thermocouple on the module which is not the same as the position of the sensor from which the BMW BMS obtains the information. Therefore, the final analysis will be performed on the thermocouple measurements.

4. Conclusions

This study represents a thorough investigation into the thermal behaviour of a high-voltage battery system in an electric vehicle (EV) under various conditions, employing advanced diagnostic equipment and precise thermocouple temperature measurements. Through a comprehensive series of tests conducted at different states of charge (SoCs) and ambient temperatures, invaluable insights have been gained regarding the thermal characteristics of the battery system.

4.1. Quantitative and Qualitative Conclusions

Temperature Analysis: This study revealed that the battery pack temperature during the drying phase within a paint booth remains below 60 °C, contrasting significantly with higher temperatures observed during battery charging, summer parking, and driving scenarios. Ambient temperatures surrounding EVs play a pivotal role in battery performance, notably influencing factors such as charging time.
Charging Speed Impact: Tests conducted on a 2013 BMW i3 Model Year highlighted the substantial impact of charging temperature on charging speed. Charging at 0 °C necessitated 120 min to reach an 80% SoC, whereas, at 25 °C, it took nearly 80 min, underscoring the necessity for heating systems in EVs to optimize charging times.
Temperature Trends: Quantitative analysis of data obtained from thermal imaging, TEXA diagnostic equipment, and thermocouples revealed consistent temperature increases with rising ambient temperature and duration of the test. Precise measurements at various points on the vehicle body and within individual battery modules were demonstrated.
Compressor Performance: The analysis of compressor temperatures elucidated its critical role in maintaining safe operating conditions for the battery system. Quantitative evaluation of compressor temperatures provided crucial data on its performance and response to thermal stress.
Battery Module Behaviour: Quantitative analysis showcased consistent elevation of temperatures in Module 1 and Module 8, with Module 5 also exhibiting increased temperatures. Temperature differences between modules are accentuated by higher paint booth temperatures, highlighting non-uniform thermal distribution within the battery pack.
Comparison of Measurement Methods: Comparing temperature measurements obtained from TEXA diagnostic equipment and thermocouples underscored the superiority of thermocouple measurements in accuracy and consistency. Thermocouples offered a more reliable assessment of battery thermal behaviour.
Thermal Management Implications: Qualitative assessment of temperature distribution across the vehicle body and battery modules provided critical insights for the development of effective thermal management strategies. Identification of hotspots and temperature gradients informs the design of cooling systems to ensure optimal battery performance and longevity.
Safety Considerations: Emphasis was placed on safety measures, particularly in monitoring compressor temperatures and halting tests when overheating occurs. Detailed examination of safety protocols highlights the commitment to ensuring the safe operation of EV battery systems.

4.2. Future Research Directions

Several avenues for future research have been proposed, including installing thermocouples in BMW i3 battery modules to measure temperatures during various charging scenarios and investigating temperature variations across battery modules under different driving styles. These directions aim to deepen our understanding of battery temperature management in EVs across diverse operational conditions, paving the way for enhanced thermal management strategies and improved battery performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O. and L.C.; data curation, A.O. and L.C.; formal analysis, A.O. and L.C.; funding acquisition, A.O. and L.C.; investigation, A.O. and L.C.; methodology, A.O.; project administration, L.C.; resources, A.O. and L.C.; supervision, L.C.; writing—original draft, A.O. and L.C.; writing—review and editing, A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Zaragoza: Industrial Doctorate (DI 4/2020).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions on privacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support received through the Industrial Doctorate financed by the University of Zaragoza (DI 4/2020) and Instituto de Investigación sobre Vehículos, S.A. (Centro Zaragoza), in which the work presented in this article was framed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Markevich, E.; Pollak, E.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. On the performance of graphitized meso carbon microbeads (MCMB)–meso carbon fibers (MCF) and synthetic graphite electrodes at elevated temperatures. J. Power Sources 2007, 174, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gabrisch, H.; Ozawa, Y.; Yazami, R. Crystal structure studies of thermally aged LiCoO2 and LiMn2O4 cathodes. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 52, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Handel, P.; Fauler, G.; Kapper, K.; Schmuck, M.; Stangl, C.; Fischer, R.; Uhlig, F.; Koller, S. Thermal aging of electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries—An investigation of the impact of protic impurities and different housing materials. J. Power Sources 2014, 267, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Leng, F.; Tan, C.M.; Pecht, M. Effect of Temperature on the Aging rate Li Ion Battery Operating above Room Temperature. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, Q.; Jiang, B.; Li, B.; Yan, Y. A critical review of thermal management models and solutions of lithium-ion batteries for the development of pure electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 64, 106–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alkhulaifi, Y.M.; Qasem, N.A.A.; Zubair, S.M. Improving the performance of thermal management system for electric and hybrid electric vehicles by adding an ejector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 201, 112133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, Z.; Xiong, R.; Lu, J.; Li, X. Temperature rise prediction of lithium-ion battery suffering external short circuit for all-climate electric vehicles application. Appl. Energy 2018, 213, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joris, D.H.; Joris, J.; Mohamed, A.M.; Peter, V.D.B.; Joeri, V.M.; Noshin, O. Combining an Electrothermal and Impedance Aging Model to Investigate Thermal Degradation Caused by Fast Charging. Energies 2018, 11, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Zareer, M.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. A novel approach for performance improvement of liquid to vapor based battery cooling systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 187, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Zareer, M.; Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. A novel phase change based cooling system for prismatic lithium ion batteries. Int. J. Refrig. 2017, 86, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, X.; Ouyang, M.; Liu, X.; Lu, L.; Xia, Y.; He, X. Thermal Runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: A review. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 10, 246–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Car Repairability Technical Support. Available online: https://rts.i-car.com/crn-1755.html (accessed on 1 July 2024).
  13. Leaf Repair Manual, Section BRM Body Repair. Revision: May 2014. Available online: https://carmanuals2.com/get/nissan-leaf-2014-body-repair-section-brm-47915#google_vignette (accessed on 4 July 2024).
  14. Nissan Motor Corporation. Available online: https://mexico.nissannews.com/es-MX/releases/nissan-da-una-segunda-vida-a-las-baterias-de-vehiculos-electricos?selectedTabId=photos# (accessed on 2 April 2024).
  15. Tesla, Collision Repair Manual. Available online: https://service.tesla.com/docs/Cybertruck/BodyRepair/BodyRepairProcedures/en-us/GUID-129E9E04-976F-4E8A-B053-4925919B3AE2.html (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  16. Car Repairability Technical Support. Available online: https://rts.i-car.com/20755.html (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  17. Car Repairability Technical Support. Available online: https://rts.i-car.com/11298.html (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  18. Car Repairability Technical Support. Available online: https://rts.i-car.com/hyb-1692.html (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  19. Honda Service Letter, 2014 Accord Hybrid. Available online: https://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/pubs/web/HSL-J-04-2014-E.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  20. Repairer Driven News. 2024. Available online: https://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2017/03/13/andersons-q5-example-battery-science-suggests-care-needed-with-electric-vehicles-in-paint-booths/ (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  21. Hamwi, H.; Rushby, T.; Mahdy, M.; Bahaj, A.S. Effects of High Ambient Temperature on Electric Vehicle Efficiency and Range: Case Study of Kuwait. Energies 2022, 15, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, T. Exploring the interactive effects of ambient temperature and vehicle auxiliary loads on electric vehicle energy consumption. Appl. Energy 2018, 227, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, P.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ou, Y.; Zeng, G.; Zhou, J.; Bai, Z. Assessment of Electric Vheicle Charging Scenarios in China Under Different- temperature Conditions. J. Energy Storage 2021, 41, 102859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. 2014 BMW i3-VINs 5486,5626,5655 & 5658 Advanced Vehicle Testing-DC Fast Charging at Temperature Test Results, Idaho National Laboratory. 2015. Available online: https://avt.inl.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fsev/2014i3DCFCAtTempBOT.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2024).
  25. A2MAC1. Available online: https://www.a2mac1.com/platform/ (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  26. Munzuel, V. Evaluation and Refinement of Measurement Procedures for High-Voltage Energy Storage Systems of Production Electric Vehicles. Master’s Thesis, University of Southampton Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics School of Engineering Sciences, Southampton, UK, 2011. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340598950_MSc_Thesis_Evaluation_and_Refinement_of_Measurement_Procedures_for_High-Voltage_Energy_Storage_Systems_of_Production_Electric_Vehicles (accessed on 4 July 2024).
Figure 1. Location of the footboard [13]. Picture showing the position of the high-voltage battery and the position of the footboard [14].
Figure 1. Location of the footboard [13]. Picture showing the position of the high-voltage battery and the position of the footboard [14].
Energies 17 03437 g001
Figure 2. Different parts of the high-voltage battery unit of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the tests. Source: BMW manuals.
Figure 2. Different parts of the high-voltage battery unit of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the tests. Source: BMW manuals.
Energies 17 03437 g002
Figure 3. Image of a module from the traction battery of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the testing of the paint booth and location of the temperature sensors.
Figure 3. Image of a module from the traction battery of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the testing of the paint booth and location of the temperature sensors.
Energies 17 03437 g003
Figure 4. Components and module layout of the energy storage system of the BMW i3 vehicle [26].
Figure 4. Components and module layout of the energy storage system of the BMW i3 vehicle [26].
Energies 17 03437 g004
Figure 5. Different painting works in the paint booth of CENTRO ZARAGOZA.
Figure 5. Different painting works in the paint booth of CENTRO ZARAGOZA.
Energies 17 03437 g005
Figure 6. Image of the exterior (left) and interior (right) of the CENTRO ZARAGOZA paint booth used during the tests.
Figure 6. Image of the exterior (left) and interior (right) of the CENTRO ZARAGOZA paint booth used during the tests.
Energies 17 03437 g006
Figure 7. Image of the Keysight 970A Datalogger and 20-channel acquisition module.
Figure 7. Image of the Keysight 970A Datalogger and 20-channel acquisition module.
Energies 17 03437 g007
Figure 8. Screenshot of the BenchVue viewing and recording software.
Figure 8. Screenshot of the BenchVue viewing and recording software.
Energies 17 03437 g008
Figure 9. Image of the T-type thermocouple with a 4-m cable for connection to the thermocouple panel.
Figure 9. Image of the T-type thermocouple with a 4-m cable for connection to the thermocouple panel.
Energies 17 03437 g009
Figure 10. Image of the information displayed by the TEXA diagnostic equipment regarding the temperature of the traction battery.
Figure 10. Image of the information displayed by the TEXA diagnostic equipment regarding the temperature of the traction battery.
Energies 17 03437 g010
Figure 11. Image of the connection of the BMW diagnostic equipment to the OBD of the BMW i3 vehicle.
Figure 11. Image of the connection of the BMW diagnostic equipment to the OBD of the BMW i3 vehicle.
Energies 17 03437 g011
Figure 12. Image of the BMW i3 vehicle inside the paint booth, ready for the temperature measurement test.
Figure 12. Image of the BMW i3 vehicle inside the paint booth, ready for the temperature measurement test.
Energies 17 03437 g012
Figure 13. Images during the tests with the BMW diagnostic equipment.
Figure 13. Images during the tests with the BMW diagnostic equipment.
Energies 17 03437 g013
Figure 14. Image of the paint booth control panel, showing the temperature and the programmed time (left). Image of the location of the probe that controls the temperature inside the booth (right).
Figure 14. Image of the paint booth control panel, showing the temperature and the programmed time (left). Image of the location of the probe that controls the temperature inside the booth (right).
Energies 17 03437 g014
Figure 15. Image of the EL-USB-2-LCD meter used to measure the temperature and humidity inside the spray booth during the tests.
Figure 15. Image of the EL-USB-2-LCD meter used to measure the temperature and humidity inside the spray booth during the tests.
Energies 17 03437 g015
Figure 16. Image of the HTI 03 THERMAL IMAGER thermal imaging camera (120 × 90) used to measure the temperature at various points on the bodywork near the location of the high-voltage battery.
Figure 16. Image of the HTI 03 THERMAL IMAGER thermal imaging camera (120 × 90) used to measure the temperature at various points on the bodywork near the location of the high-voltage battery.
Energies 17 03437 g016
Figure 17. Images of the measurement points on the underside of the vehicle (under the high-voltage battery).
Figure 17. Images of the measurement points on the underside of the vehicle (under the high-voltage battery).
Energies 17 03437 g017
Figure 18. Images of the measuring point in the footboard area.
Figure 18. Images of the measuring point in the footboard area.
Energies 17 03437 g018
Figure 19. Image of the values displayed by the diagnostic equipment, in the case of the test with a battery 50% SoC, among which the current state of charge value (displayed value) and the state of charge can be seen.
Figure 19. Image of the values displayed by the diagnostic equipment, in the case of the test with a battery 50% SoC, among which the current state of charge value (displayed value) and the state of charge can be seen.
Energies 17 03437 g019
Figure 20. Image showing the state of the shut-off valve of the high-voltage battery cooling system and the average cell temperature.
Figure 20. Image showing the state of the shut-off valve of the high-voltage battery cooling system and the average cell temperature.
Energies 17 03437 g020
Figure 21. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested (test battery 50% SoC).
Figure 21. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested (test battery 50% SoC).
Energies 17 03437 g021
Figure 22. Graph displaying the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the cabin during the test conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Figure 22. Graph displaying the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the cabin during the test conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g022
Figure 23. Image of the temperature measurement on the underside of the BMW i3 vehicle using the thermal imaging camera.
Figure 23. Image of the temperature measurement on the underside of the BMW i3 vehicle using the thermal imaging camera.
Energies 17 03437 g023
Figure 24. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 1, as specified in Table 2.
Figure 24. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 1, as specified in Table 2.
Energies 17 03437 g024
Figure 25. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 2, as specified in Table 2.
Figure 25. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 2, as specified in Table 2.
Energies 17 03437 g025
Figure 26. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 3, as specified in Table 2.
Figure 26. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 3, as specified in Table 2.
Energies 17 03437 g026
Figure 27. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 2.
Figure 27. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 2.
Energies 17 03437 g027
Figure 28. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermographic camera in the four tests carried out with the battery at 50% SoC.
Figure 28. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermographic camera in the four tests carried out with the battery at 50% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g028
Figure 29. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests carried out with the battery at 50% SoC.
Figure 29. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests carried out with the battery at 50% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g029
Figure 30. Identification of the position of the modules in the battery pack. Source: BMW i01 manual.
Figure 30. Identification of the position of the modules in the battery pack. Source: BMW i01 manual.
Energies 17 03437 g030
Figure 31. Image of the values displayed by the diagnostic equipment, in the case of the test with a battery SoC 100%, among which the current state of charge value (displayed value) and the state of charge can be seen.
Figure 31. Image of the values displayed by the diagnostic equipment, in the case of the test with a battery SoC 100%, among which the current state of charge value (displayed value) and the state of charge can be seen.
Energies 17 03437 g031
Figure 32. Graph showing the temperature (red) and humidity (blue) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the cabin during the test carried out with the battery at 100% SoC.
Figure 32. Graph showing the temperature (red) and humidity (blue) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the cabin during the test carried out with the battery at 100% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g032
Figure 33. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested (test battery 100% SoC).
Figure 33. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested (test battery 100% SoC).
Energies 17 03437 g033
Figure 34. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested, when the cabin temperature is 58.5 °C.
Figure 34. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested, when the cabin temperature is 58.5 °C.
Energies 17 03437 g034
Figure 35. Image showing that the shut-off valve of the cooling system is open.
Figure 35. Image showing that the shut-off valve of the cooling system is open.
Energies 17 03437 g035
Figure 36. Image showing the temperature of each of the modules after opening the shut-off valve of the refrigeration system.
Figure 36. Image showing the temperature of each of the modules after opening the shut-off valve of the refrigeration system.
Energies 17 03437 g036
Figure 37. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested reached when the test was stopped.
Figure 37. Image showing the temperature and voltage of each of the modules of the voltage battery tested reached when the test was stopped.
Energies 17 03437 g037
Figure 38. Image showing the temperature reached in the compressor now it is activated.
Figure 38. Image showing the temperature reached in the compressor now it is activated.
Energies 17 03437 g038
Figure 39. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 1, as specified in Table 5.
Figure 39. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 1, as specified in Table 5.
Energies 17 03437 g039
Figure 40. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 2, as specified in Table 5.
Figure 40. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 2, as specified in Table 5.
Energies 17 03437 g040
Figure 41. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 2.
Figure 41. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 2.
Energies 17 03437 g041
Figure 42. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 3, as specified in Table 5.
Figure 42. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 3, as specified in Table 5.
Energies 17 03437 g042
Figure 43. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 3.
Figure 43. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 3.
Energies 17 03437 g043
Figure 44. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 5.
Figure 44. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 5.
Energies 17 03437 g044
Figure 45. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 4.
Figure 45. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to check its operation in Test 4.
Energies 17 03437 g045
Figure 46. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Figure 46. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g046
Figure 47. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Figure 47. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g047
Figure 48. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted for different battery SoCs analysed.
Figure 48. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted for different battery SoCs analysed.
Energies 17 03437 g048
Figure 49. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests conducted for different battery SoCs analysed.
Figure 49. Temperature graph of each of the traction battery modules obtained with the BMW diagnostic equipment in the four tests conducted for different battery SoCs analysed.
Energies 17 03437 g049
Figure 50. Image of the BMW i3 being tested inside the paint booth with the thermocouple connection panel (left). Detail of the panel showing the cables from the 8 thermocouples placed in each of the battery modules and the thermocouple positioned in the compressor (right).
Figure 50. Image of the BMW i3 being tested inside the paint booth with the thermocouple connection panel (left). Detail of the panel showing the cables from the 8 thermocouples placed in each of the battery modules and the thermocouple positioned in the compressor (right).
Energies 17 03437 g050
Figure 51. Image showing the connection of the TEXA diagnostic equipment to the OBD II port of the BMW I3 vehicle (left) and another image displaying the temperature measurement equipment alongside the TEXA equipment (right).
Figure 51. Image showing the connection of the TEXA diagnostic equipment to the OBD II port of the BMW I3 vehicle (left) and another image displaying the temperature measurement equipment alongside the TEXA equipment (right).
Energies 17 03437 g051
Figure 52. Disassembly procedure of the high voltage battery of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested.
Figure 52. Disassembly procedure of the high voltage battery of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested.
Energies 17 03437 g052aEnergies 17 03437 g052b
Figure 53. Placement of the thermocouples in each of the eight high-voltage battery modules of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested.
Figure 53. Placement of the thermocouples in each of the eight high-voltage battery modules of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested.
Energies 17 03437 g053aEnergies 17 03437 g053b
Figure 54. Image showing the numbering assigned to each of the traction battery modules of the BMW i3 vehicle (left), taking into account the numbering provided by the manufacturer (right).
Figure 54. Image showing the numbering assigned to each of the traction battery modules of the BMW i3 vehicle (left), taking into account the numbering provided by the manufacturer (right).
Energies 17 03437 g054
Figure 55. Image showing the hole (relief valve) through which the wiring of the thermocouples is passed out, which will later be connected to a connection panel (left). Image of the connection panel where the thermocouple cables are connected to display the temperature in the measured area using the datalogger (right).
Figure 55. Image showing the hole (relief valve) through which the wiring of the thermocouples is passed out, which will later be connected to a connection panel (left). Image of the connection panel where the thermocouple cables are connected to display the temperature in the measured area using the datalogger (right).
Energies 17 03437 g055
Figure 56. Assembly procedure of the high-voltage battery of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested, after placing the thermocouples on the modules where their temperature will be measured during the tests.
Figure 56. Assembly procedure of the high-voltage battery of the BMW i3 vehicle to be tested, after placing the thermocouples on the modules where their temperature will be measured during the tests.
Energies 17 03437 g056
Figure 57. Graph illustrating the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the paint booth during the test conducted with the battery at 50% SoC (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Figure 57. Graph illustrating the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the paint booth during the test conducted with the battery at 50% SoC (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Energies 17 03437 g057
Figure 58. Thermal images captured at the end of Test 1, as outlined in Table 8, using a thermal imaging camera.
Figure 58. Thermal images captured at the end of Test 1, as outlined in Table 8, using a thermal imaging camera.
Energies 17 03437 g058
Figure 59. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 1.
Figure 59. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 1.
Energies 17 03437 g059
Figure 60. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 2, as specified in Table 8.
Figure 60. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 2, as specified in Table 8.
Energies 17 03437 g060
Figure 61. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 2.
Figure 61. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 2.
Energies 17 03437 g061
Figure 62. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 3, as specified in Table 8.
Figure 62. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 3, as specified in Table 8.
Energies 17 03437 g062
Figure 63. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 3.
Figure 63. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 3.
Energies 17 03437 g063
Figure 64. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 8.
Figure 64. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the end of Test 4, as specified in Table 8.
Energies 17 03437 g064
Figure 65. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 4.
Figure 65. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera of the compressor to verify its operation during Test 4.
Energies 17 03437 g065
Figure 66. Temperature measurements obtained using the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the various tests conducted.
Figure 66. Temperature measurements obtained using the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the various tests conducted.
Energies 17 03437 g066aEnergies 17 03437 g066b
Figure 67. Graph showing the temperature measured at various points of the bodywork using a thermal imaging camera during the four tests conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Figure 67. Graph showing the temperature measured at various points of the bodywork using a thermal imaging camera during the four tests conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g067
Figure 68. Graph showing the temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained with temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples) during the four tests conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Figure 68. Graph showing the temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained with temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples) during the four tests conducted with the battery at 50% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g068
Figure 69. Graph depicting temperatures measured in the battery pack using TEXA diagnostic equipment and the average values from thermocouples in the modules.
Figure 69. Graph depicting temperatures measured in the battery pack using TEXA diagnostic equipment and the average values from thermocouples in the modules.
Energies 17 03437 g069
Figure 70. Graph showing the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the paint booth during the test conducted with the battery at 100% SoC (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Figure 70. Graph showing the temperature (red line) and humidity (blue line) recorded by the EL-USB-2-LCD meter inside the paint booth during the test conducted with the battery at 100% SoC (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Energies 17 03437 g070
Figure 71. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 1, as specified in Table 13.
Figure 71. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four designated measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 1, as specified in Table 13.
Energies 17 03437 g071
Figure 72. Thermal imaging camera image capturing the operation of the compressor during Test 1.
Figure 72. Thermal imaging camera image capturing the operation of the compressor during Test 1.
Energies 17 03437 g072
Figure 73. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four specified measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 2, as outlined in Table 13.
Figure 73. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four specified measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 2, as outlined in Table 13.
Energies 17 03437 g073
Figure 74. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 2.
Figure 74. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 2.
Energies 17 03437 g074
Figure 75. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 3, as outlined in Table 13.
Figure 75. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four defined measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 3, as outlined in Table 13.
Energies 17 03437 g075
Figure 76. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 3.
Figure 76. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 3.
Energies 17 03437 g076
Figure 77. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four specified measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 4, as outlined in Table 13.
Figure 77. Images captured with the thermal imaging camera at the four specified measurement points, at the conclusion of Test 4, as outlined in Table 13.
Energies 17 03437 g077
Figure 78. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 4.
Figure 78. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor to verify its operation during Test 4.
Energies 17 03437 g078
Figure 79. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor 5 min after stopping the test.
Figure 79. Image captured with the thermal imaging camera on the compressor 5 min after stopping the test.
Energies 17 03437 g079
Figure 80. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests carried out with the battery at 100% SoC.
Figure 80. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests carried out with the battery at 100% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g080
Figure 81. Graph of the temperature in each of the modules of the traction battery obtained with temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples) in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Figure 81. Graph of the temperature in each of the modules of the traction battery obtained with temperature-measuring equipment (thermocouples) in the four tests conducted with the battery at 100% SoC.
Energies 17 03437 g081
Figure 82. Graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the TEXA diagnostic equipment and from the average values in the modules with the thermocouples.
Figure 82. Graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the TEXA diagnostic equipment and from the average values in the modules with the thermocouples.
Energies 17 03437 g082
Figure 83. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted for the different battery SoCs analysed.
Figure 83. Graph of the temperature measured at different points of the bodywork with a thermal imaging camera in the four tests conducted for the different battery SoCs analysed.
Energies 17 03437 g083
Figure 84. Graph of the temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained with the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment, in the four tests conducted for the different battery SoCs analysed.
Figure 84. Graph of the temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained with the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment, in the four tests conducted for the different battery SoCs analysed.
Energies 17 03437 g084
Figure 85. Graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the TEXA diagnostic equipment (left), and graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the temperature measurements taken in each module with the placement of thermocouples (right).
Figure 85. Graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the TEXA diagnostic equipment (left), and graph of the temperature measured in the battery pack with the temperature measurements taken in each module with the placement of thermocouples (right).
Energies 17 03437 g085
Figure 86. Graph of the temperature measured in each of the modules with the BMW diagnostic equipment (left) and graph of the temperature measured in each of the modules with the temperature measurement equipment using thermocouples (right).
Figure 86. Graph of the temperature measured in each of the modules with the BMW diagnostic equipment (left) and graph of the temperature measured in each of the modules with the temperature measurement equipment using thermocouples (right).
Energies 17 03437 g086
Table 1. Specifications of the high-voltage battery unit of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the tests.
Table 1. Specifications of the high-voltage battery unit of the BMW i3 vehicle used in the tests.
High Voltage Battery Unit 60 Ah
2013
Number of lithium-ion ells in the battery96 (in series)
Number of cell modules (each with 12 cells)8
Nominal voltage360 V
Voltage at 100% state of charge395 V
Voltage at 0% state of charge259 V
Capacity60 Ah
Energy (Nominal value)21.6 kWh
Energy (usable)18.8 kWh
Dimensions of battery housing (length × width × high)1660 mm × 964 mm × 174 mm
Weight~233 kg
Table 2. Definition of tests carried out with the traction battery at 50% state of charge.
Table 2. Definition of tests carried out with the traction battery at 50% state of charge.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTpaint booth SetTimedriying SetTpaint booth MeasuredHumiditypaint booth Measured
1 (reference)50%ConnectedDisconnected *60 °C60 min (in the first)56 °C12.5%rh
250%ConnectedDisconnected *60 °C60 min57.5 °C10.0%rh
350%ConnectedDisconnected *80 °C60 min64.5 °C8.0%rh
450%ConnectedDisconnected **80 °C35 min64.5 °C7.5%rh
* Cooling switched on, but no fan starts operation as the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test because the valve opened and cooling commenced, preventing a further rise in module temperatures. The cooling valve opens when a module reaches 32 °C, by the time measurements were taken, the module had already cooled due to the open valve.
Table 3. Results of measurements at the four measurement points defined on the bodywork for the four tests conducted.
Table 3. Results of measurements at the four measurement points defined on the bodywork for the four tests conducted.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingT1 Measured BodyworkT2 Measured BodyworkT3 Measured BodyworkT4 Measured Bodywork
1 (reference)50%ConnectedDisconnected *22.9 °C19.2 °C32.0 °C34.1 °C
250%ConnectedDisconnected *25.4 °C23.8 °C37.9 °C38.7 °C
350%ConnectedDisconnected *39.5 °C47.3 °C55.1 °C55.4 °C
450%ConnectedDisconnected **40.1 °C50.2 °C62.6 °C61.7 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan starts operation, as the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test because the valve opened and cooling commenced, preventing a further rise in module temperatures. The cooling valve opens when a module reaches 32 °C, by the time measurements were taken, the module had already cooled due to the open valve.
Table 4. Temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment for the four tests carried out.
Table 4. Temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment for the four tests carried out.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTmodule 1 BMWTmodule 2 BMWTmodule 3 BMWTmodule 4 BMWTmodule 5 BMWTmodule 6 BMWTmodule 7 BMWTmodule 8 BMW
1 (reference)50%ConnectedDisconnected *16.5 °C14.5 °C14.0 °C14.0 °C14.5 °C14.5 °C14.5 °C16.0 °C
250%ConnectedDisconnected *22.0 °C19.0 °C18.0 °C19.0 °C19.0 °C18.5 °C18.5 °C21.0 °C
350%ConnectedDisconnected *28.5 °C24.5 °C24.0 °C24.5 °C26.0 °C24.5 °C25.0 °C28.5 °C
450%ConnectedDisconnected **30.0 °C25.5 °C25.0 °C26.0 °C27.0 °C25.5 °C26.5 °C30.0 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan starts operation, as the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test because the valve opened and cooling commenced, preventing a further rise in module temperatures. The cooling valve opens when a module reaches 32 °C, by the time measurements were taken, the module had already cooled due to the open valve.
Table 5. Definition of tests carried out with the traction battery at 100% state of charge.
Table 5. Definition of tests carried out with the traction battery at 100% state of charge.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTpaint booth SetTimedriying SetTpaint booth MeasuredHumiditypaint booth Measured
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min (in the first)56 °C10.5%rh
2100%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min58.5 °C9.0%rh
3100%ConnectedConnected *80 °C43 min65.0 °C7.5%rh
4100%ConnectedConnected **80 °C10 min67.0 °C7.5%rh
* Cooling is activated, but the fan does not start operating; the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test for safety reasons because the module temperatures were still increasing, caused by the compressor overheating and consequently not functioning due to the overtemperature.
Table 6. Results of the measurements at the four measurement points defined on the bodywork for the four tests carried out.
Table 6. Results of the measurements at the four measurement points defined on the bodywork for the four tests carried out.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingT1 Measured BodyworkT2 Measured BodyworkT3 Measured BodyworkT4 Measured Bodywork
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *32.9 °C32.5 °C39.0 °C40.6 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *34.5 °C39.1 °C46.3 °C46.3 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *42.1 °C57.8 °C63.5 °C62.7 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **49.9 °C57.5 °C65.2 °C66.7 °C
* Cooling is activated, but the fan does not start operating; the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test for safety reasons because the module temperatures were still increasing, caused by the compressor overheating and consequently not functioning due to the overtemperature.
Table 7. Temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with an SoC at 100% battery.
Table 7. Temperature in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the BMW diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with an SoC at 100% battery.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTmodule 1 BMWTmodule 2 BMWTmodule 3 BMWTmodule 4 BMWTmodule 5 BMWTmodule 6 BMWTmodule 7 BMWTmodule 8 BMW
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *25.0 °C22.5 °C21.5 °C22.5 °C23.0 °C22.0 °C22.0 °C24.5 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *30.5 °C27.0 °C26.5 °C27.0 °C28.0 °C26.5 °C26.5 °C30.0 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *35.0 °C31.5 °C31.0 °C32.0 °C33.0 °C31.5 °C32.0 °C35.5 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **36.0 °C32.5 °C32.0 °C33.0 °C34.5 °C32.5 °C33.0 °C36.5 °C
* Cooling is activated, but the fan does not start operating; the fan valve remains closed. ** We stopped the test for safety reasons because the module temperatures were still increasing, caused by the compressor overheating and consequently not functioning due to the overtemperature.
Table 8. Definition of tests conducted with the traction battery at 50% state of charge (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Table 8. Definition of tests conducted with the traction battery at 50% state of charge (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTpaint booth SetTimedriying SetTpaint booth MeasuredHumiditypaint booth Measured
1 (reference)50%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min (in the first)50.5 °C10.0%rh
250%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min58.0 °C7.0%rh
350%ConnectedConnected *80 °C60 min60.0 °C7.0%rh
450%ConnectedConnected *80 °C60 min61.5 °C7.5%rh
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed.
Table 9. Temperature measurement at the four designated points on the bodywork and the temperature of the compressor for the four tests conducted.
Table 9. Temperature measurement at the four designated points on the bodywork and the temperature of the compressor for the four tests conducted.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingT1 Measured BodyworkT2 Measured BodyworkT3 Measured BodyworkT4 Measured BodyworkTcompressor
1 (reference)50%ConnectedConnected *22.6 °C24.4 °C32.2 °C31.6 °C30.9 °C
250%ConnectedConnected *26.0 °C28.9 °C39.0 °C37.2 °C39.1 °C
350%ConnectedConnected *31.2 °C38.9 °C47.4 °C45.4 °C49.7 °C
450%ConnectedConnected *41.3 °C50.8 °C54.1 °C50.7 °C56.8 °C
* Cooling is switched on, but no fan is operational as the fan valve is closed.
Table 10. Traction battery pack temperatures obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted.
Table 10. Traction battery pack temperatures obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTmeanTmaxTmin
1 (reference)50%ConnectedConnected *16.68 °C18.99 °C16.0 °C
250%ConnectedConnected *20.82 °C24.03 °C19.04 °C
350%ConnectedConnected *25.18 °C28.00 °C23.00 °C
450%ConnectedConnected *30.54 °C34.04 °C27.04 °C
* Cooling is switched on, but no fan is operational as the fan valve is closed.
Table 11. Temperatures in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment for the four tests carried out.
Table 11. Temperatures in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment for the four tests carried out.
Test
Number
SoCVehicleCoolingTmodule 1
thermocouple
Tmodule 2
thermocouple
Tmodule 3
thermocouple
Tmodule 4
thermocouple
Tmodule 5
thermocouple
Tmodule 6
thermocouple
Tmodule 7
thermocouple
Tmodule 8
thermocouple
Tcompressor
1
(reference)
50%ConnectedConnected *16.9 °C15.9 °C15.8 °C16.0 °C16.3 °C15.9 °C15.9 °C17.0 °C31.7 °C
250%ConnectedConnected *21.3 °C19.2 °C19.0 °C19.8 °C20.6 °C19.3 °C19.4 °C21.5 °C42.4 °C
350%ConnectedConnected *25.9 °C23.0 °C22.7 °C24.0 °C25.1 °C23.3 °C23.4 °C26.3 °C49.8 °C
450%ConnectedConnected *31.2 °C27.8 °C27.4 °C28.8 °C30.5 °C28.3 °C28.4 °C32.0 °C56.9 °C
* Cooling is switched on, but no fan is operational as the fan valve is closed.
Table 12. Traction battery pack temperatures obtained from TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted.
Table 12. Traction battery pack temperatures obtained from TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTEXATermocouple
TmeanTmaxTminTmeanTmaxTmin
1 (reference)50%ConnectedConnected *16.68 °C18.99 °C16.0 °C16.2 °C17.0 °C15.8 °C
250%ConnectedConnected *20.82 °C24.03 °C19.04 °C20.0 °C21.5 °C19.0 °C
350%ConnectedConnected *25.18 °C28.00 °C23.00 °C24.2 °C26.3 °C22.7 °C
450%ConnectedConnected *30.54 °C34.04 °C27.04 °C29.3 °C32.0 °C27.4 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed.
Table 13. Definition of tests conducted with the traction battery at 100% state of charge (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Table 13. Definition of tests conducted with the traction battery at 100% state of charge (TEXA diagnostic equipment + thermocouples).
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTpaint booth SetTimedriying SetTpaint booth MeasuredHumiditypaint booth Measured
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min (in the first)55.0 °C8.5%rh
2100%ConnectedConnected *60 °C60 min62.0 °C6.0%rh
3100%ConnectedConnected *80 °C60 min62.5 °C6.0%rh
4100%ConnectedConnected **80 °C33 min63.0 °C6.0%rh
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed. ** The test is halted for safety reasons because the module temperatures continue to rise due to overheating of the compressor, which is not functioning.
Table 14. Result of the measurement at the four defined points on the bodywork and the measurement on the compressor for the four tests conducted with a 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Table 14. Result of the measurement at the four defined points on the bodywork and the measurement on the compressor for the four tests conducted with a 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingT1 Measured BodyworkT2 Measured BodyworkT3 Measured BodyworkT4 Measured BodyworkTcompressor
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *29.5 °C28.0 °C33.9 °C34.3 °C32.7 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *31.2 °C32.7 °C44.3 °C41.8 °C44.5 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *42.5 °C49.5 °C55.1 °C51.7 °C58.2 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **45.2 °C55.0 °C62.7 °C59.8 °C61.1 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed. ** The test is stopped for safety as the temperature of the modules continues to rise due to overheating of the compressor, resulting in its inoperative state.
Table 15. Traction battery pack temperature obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with a 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Table 15. Traction battery pack temperature obtained from the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with a 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTmeanTmaxTmin
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *18.67 °C20.02 °C18.02 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *22.93 °C26.01 °C22.01 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *28.87 °C32.00 °C26.00 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **32.24 °C36.01 °C29.01 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed. ** The test is stopped for safety as the temperature of the modules continues to rise due to overheating of the compressor, resulting in its inoperative state.
Table 16. Temperatures in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment for the four tests conducted with 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Table 16. Temperatures in each of the traction battery modules obtained from the thermocouple temperature measurement equipment for the four tests conducted with 100% SoC in the battery pack.
Test
Number
SoCVehicleCoolingTmodule 1
thermocouple
Tmodule 2
thermocouple
Tmodule 3
thermocouple
Tmodule 4
thermocouple
Tmodule 5
thermocouple
Tmodule 6
thermocouple
Tmodule 7
thermocouple
Tmodule 8
thermocouple
Tcompressor
1
(reference)
100%ConnectedConnected *19.0 °C17.9 °C17.7 °C17.7 °C17.9 °C17.7 °C17.9 °C19.2 °C33.8 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *23.4 °C21.3 °C21.0 °C21.7 °C22.5 °C21.4 °C21.6 °C23.8 °C45.9 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *29.2 °C26.2 °C25.7 °C26.8 °C28.3 °C26.5 °C26.7 °C30.2 °C56.6 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **32.9 °C29.5 °C28.9 °C30.1 °C31.9 °C29.9 °C30.2 °C33.9 °C60.6 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed. ** The test is stopped for safety as the temperature of the modules is still rising because the compressor has overheated and due to this overtemperature it is not running.
Table 17. Traction battery pack temperature obtained using the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with an SoC at 100% for the battery pack.
Table 17. Traction battery pack temperature obtained using the TEXA diagnostic equipment for the four tests conducted with an SoC at 100% for the battery pack.
Test NumberSoCVehicleCoolingTEXATermocouple
TmeanTmaxTminTmeanTmaxTmin
1 (reference)100%ConnectedConnected *18.68 °C20.02 °C18.02 °C18.1 °C19.2 °C17.7 °C
2100%ConnectedConnected *22.93 °C26.01 °C22.01 °C22.1 °C23.8 °C21.0 °C
3100%ConnectedConnected *28.87 °C32.00 °C26.00 °C27.5 °C30.2 °C25.7 °C
4100%ConnectedConnected **32.24 °C36.01 °C29.01 °C30.9 °C33.9 °C28.9 °C
* Cooling switched on, but no fan comes into operation as the fan valve is closed. ** The test is stopped for safety as the temperature of the modules is still rising because the compressor has overheated and due to this overtemperature it is not running.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olona, A.; Castejón, L. Analysis of the Temperature Reached by the Traction Battery of an Electric Vehicle during the Drying Phase in the Paint Booth. Energies 2024, 17, 3437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143437

AMA Style

Olona A, Castejón L. Analysis of the Temperature Reached by the Traction Battery of an Electric Vehicle during the Drying Phase in the Paint Booth. Energies. 2024; 17(14):3437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olona, Ana, and Luis Castejón. 2024. "Analysis of the Temperature Reached by the Traction Battery of an Electric Vehicle during the Drying Phase in the Paint Booth" Energies 17, no. 14: 3437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143437

APA Style

Olona, A., & Castejón, L. (2024). Analysis of the Temperature Reached by the Traction Battery of an Electric Vehicle during the Drying Phase in the Paint Booth. Energies, 17(14), 3437. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop