Next Article in Journal
Methodology for the Optimization of a Novel Hydro Turbine with a Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Formulation of an Efficiency Model Valid for High Vacuum Flat Plate Collectors
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Feasibility of Producing and Using Biogas in Large Cities, Based on the Example of Krakow and Its Surrounding Municipalities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Analysis of Large-Scale Renewable Energy (RE) Source Investment Incorporating Power System Transmission Costs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Kernel-Based Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil Seeds: Techniques, Optimization, and Environmental Implications

by
Kavitha Munisamy Sambasivam
1,*,
Praveen Kuppan
2,
Lafiya Shanavas Laila
3,
Viswanaathan Shashirekha
4,
Krishnamurthi Tamilarasan
5 and
Sudharsanam Abinandan
2,*
1
CO2 Research and Green Technologies Center, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
2
Global Center for Environmental Remediation, College of Engineering Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
3
School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
4
Shri AMM Murugappa Chettiar Research Center (MCRC), Taramani, Chennai 600113, India
5
Department of Chemical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(22), 7589; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227589
Submission received: 17 October 2023 / Revised: 9 November 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published: 15 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Renewable and Sustainable Energy)

Abstract

:
Biodiesel represents a renewable alternative to conventional diesel, offering comparable potential. This paper delves into the production of biodiesel from non-edible oil seeds, emphasizing kernel-based feedstocks for their sustainable qualities. We discuss the critical stages of kernel separation and degumming, offering an in-depth examination of seed distribution, attributes, pretreatment, and oil extraction methodologies. Additionally, the paper considers the status of life cycle assessment (LCA) associated with biodiesel. Furthermore, it outlines the necessary steps toward sustainable biodiesel production and underscores the importance of integrating a sustainable circular bioeconomy in biodiesel synthesis.

1. Introduction

The depletion of fossil fuels and environmental concerns have led to the use of renewable energy as an alternative fuel source in recent years [1]. Biodiesel is an alternative fuel source that can substitute diesel fuel. Biodiesel is defined as mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids and is typically produced through the transesterification of oils and fats with methanol or ethanol in the presence of different acidic and alkaline catalysts [2,3,4]. The advantages of biodiesel as a fuel source are its renewable nature, non-toxicity, and mobility and the fact that it is readily obtainable and ecologically sound [5]. Biodiesel is obtained from fats and oils and has fewer hydrocarbons, reduced carbon monoxide emissions, and reduced smoke and particulates and provides engine lubrication and a higher cetane number compared with petro-diesel [6,7]. In addition to these benefits, biodiesel lacks sulfur and aromatic compounds, which are present in petroleum diesel. The minimization of air pollution is achieved by the reduction of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter through the replacement of petroleum diesel with biodiesel. Biodiesel usage not only provides a clean environment but can also decrease cancer-causing agents and air toxicity in a considerable range [5,8].
Over 350 oil crops have been identified for biodiesel production around the world [7,9,10]. The feedstocks used for biodiesel production are categorized into edible vegetable oils, non-edible oils, waste oils, and animal fats [7,9]. Biodiesel produced from edible oil sources that include palm and soybean serves as a first-generation fuel. Biodiesel derived from edible sources not only increases the price of food but also causes environmental issues. Biofuel production and use have drawbacks as well, including land and water resource requirements, as well as air and groundwater pollution [11]. Non-edible oil sources are found to be more beneficial than edible oil sources. Biodiesel obtained from these non-edible oil sources is considered a second-generation fuel [12]. Non-edible oil sources are preferred over edible oil sources due to the following reasons: adaptability in marginal land with a smaller moisture demand, development in arid zones, propagation through direct seeds or cuttings, the restoration of wasteland, the absorption of CO2 emissions, increased rural employment, non-competition with agricultural resources, eco-friendliness, the ability to adapt intercropping systems, the production of other useful products along with fuel, resistance to pests, renewable sources, good availablity, lower sulfur content, and lower aromatic content [1].
There are numerous methods available for the extraction of oil from vegetable sources. A screw press is commonly employed for oil extraction and it is one of the traditional methods used to extract oil from kernels [13]. The efficiency of the screw press depends mainly on the type of feedstock utilized [14]. Generally, dried and treated kernels are employed for this type of mechanical extraction [15,16]. Mechanical press extraction is a continuous process of extraction with a high yield. Castor seeds produce 36% of the oil, while Jatropha seeds produce up to 25% of the oil. A high oil yield was obtained at a temperature of 175 °C and 135 rpm speed for Jatropha, while, for castor seed, a 250 °C preheating temperature with a 35 rpm screw rotation speed was optimal. The hydraulic press produces less oil from Jatropha and castor compared to other mechanical methods because of oil absorption [17]. Another common method used for extraction is solvent extraction, where n-hexane is employed. The oil yield and oil quality are superior compared to mechanical extraction [18]. Numerous factors are involved in solvent extraction to obtain maximum yields, which include the solvent type, reaction temperature, stirring speed, feedstock size, time, solid-to-solvent ratio, and the moisture content of the feedstock [19]. To increase the oil yield, numerous pre-treatments of the feedstock are required, which comprise preparation, grating, drying, and moisture conditioning of the kernel required before oil extraction [20]. Seeds are processed by removing the shell or husk, followed by cracking, crushing, cooking, and kernel drying, which increase the oil yield during the pressing of oil seeds [21,22]. This pre-treatment of oil seeds has a substantial impact on the oil yield [23]. Unprocessed seeds with hulls decrease the yield considerably, due to the absorption of oil by the hull [23,24]. The harvesting and drying of oil seeds were also found to have a significant impact on the oil yield [25]. The particle size of the feedstock also plays a major role in the oil yield [6].
India has a huge land area for forestry. Many sources have been identified as possible sources for biodiesel production. Currently, the most common non-edible feedstocks analyzed for biodiesel production in India are karanja oil, Jatropha oil, mahua oil, Pongamia oil, rubber oil, palm oil, jojoba oil, cottonseed oil, and neem oil. These feedstocks have higher free fatty acid content, which are difficult to convert into biodiesel using alkaline catalysts because they undergo the saponification process, thereby reducing the biodiesel yield [26]. The use of an alkaline catalyst is possible when the free fatty acid levels are less than 0.3% to 3% [27]. Usually, two-step transesterification is performed for oils with higher free fatty acid content and the reduction of the free fatty acids in the oil is achieved using an acid catalysis technique followed by alkali transesterification [28,29]. The cost of biodiesel is dependent on parameters such as the type and availability of the source, the production process, and production costs and also includes the usage of additives while producing the biodiesel [30]. Among these parameters, feedstock acquisition plays a major role in the cost of biodiesel production [31]. Oilseeds are the major feedstock for biodiesel production; thus, focusing on the improvement of these feedstocks concerning their yields is key to the success of biofuel plants. The yield of oil content, free fatty acid content, fatty acid composition, and biodiesel yield through transesterification are all factors that play a major role in the maximum production of biodiesel. Most researchers focus on the type of oil extraction to improve the yield, transesterification methods, and the application of green catalysts, but there are other factors that have to be considered, such as the quantity of seed yield, space between plants, propagation methods, fertilizer amount required, type of soil, water requirement, removal of weeds, pruning and harvesting techniques for seeds, processing of seeds, and seed storage.
Biodiesel assessment comprises three main parameters, which include the energy balance, a decline in greenhouse emissions, and the methyl ester yield [32]. Further investigations on the energy utilized in biodiesel synthesis and its life cycle assessment (LCA) are required [33]. The complete investigation of biodiesel production from soybeans was performed and the inputs used in lifecycle analysis had six phases: soybean production, transportation, crushing, biodiesel synthesis, distribution, and its application in the engine [34]. LCA is a technique used to assess the possible impacts created by the product on the environment, from the raw material to the end product. The standard method for LCA was developed by international organizations for standardization, namely ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006. Most of the LCA studies have focused on single environmental concerns such as water usage, global warming, and the energy used to generate a single product. However, the impact on many parameters has to be studied [35]. The production of biodiesel has been categorized into two major stages, which are agricultural-based and industrial-based tasks, as shown in Figure 1. The production of oil seeds includes site processing, seed production, sowing, the usage of fertilizers, pesticide and herbicide application, watering, and harvesting [36]. The storage and processing of oilseeds, degumming, biodiesel production, the processing of oil cakes, and the purification of biodiesel and its by-product, glycerin, are considered industrial-based work. This paper aims to review the oil extraction techniques, biodiesel production, fatty acid composition, and physical and chemical properties of oil.
Biodiesel production from microalgae has vast advantages, and it is classified as a third-generation biofuel. Microalgae can use atmospheric carbon dioxide and different types of wastewater, accumulate lipids, and survive in extreme weather and offer a potential source for the extraction of valuable compounds [37]. Transesterification and thermo-pressure transformations are the two most common methods of producing microalgal biodiesel [38]. Transesterification converts only a small portion of the microalgal dry mass (between 7 and 40%) into biofuel [39]. Its economic yield can be increased further through gasification, pyrolysis as a catalyst in bio-refineries, and the production of valuable compounds such as polyunsaturated fatty acids or other by-products [40].

Objective of the Paper

The most favorable condition for the selection of feedstocks for biodiesel production is based on the oil content of the source. Oil extraction from these feedstocks is done using either the seed or kernel. The direct usage of seeds for oil extraction is not applicable for a few feedstocks. This highlights the need for seed processing to obtain kernels. The foremost step in the production of biodiesel with high yields relies on the successful extraction of oil from seeds. The oil content of the seed is usually low compared to the kernel. The major constraint in oil extraction is the absorption of oil by the outer shell of the kernel. Proper separation of the kernel is an important step in maximizing the oil yield from the seed. Kernel-based oil extraction not only increases the oil yield but also enhances the quality of the oil cake. However, there is a lack of data on the processing of seeds to acquire kernels. The current work focuses on kernel-based biodiesel.

2. Kernel-Based Biomass Feedstock

2.1. Jatropha curcas L.

Jatropha belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family and tends to grow on abandoned agricultural land. It grows up to 5–7 m tall [41,42]. This species is native to India, Brazil, Central America, Argentina, Africa, Mexico, and Peru [10,43]. The tree can survive in soil that is moderately saline or degraded soil and adapts well in arid and semiarid areas. The oil content of Jatropha kernels varies from 43 to 59% [7]. The lifespan of this large shrub varies from 30 to 50 years, which mainly depends on the soil conditions, and the yield varies from 0.1 t ha−1 Y−1 to 8 t ha−1 Y−1 [44].

2.2. Pongamia pinnata

Pongamia pinnata is a small tree belonging to the Legumnosae family that is native to India and Southeast Asia [45,46]. This tree is also found in tropical regions such as Australia, China, New Zealand, and the USA and has high tolerance to saline soil. The yield of seeds is around 9–90 kg per tree, which is roughly 900–9000 kg of seeds per ha [46]. This particular species not only produces oilseeds but also, in turn, fixes nitrogen in the soil [47]. The oil content of the seed varies from 30 to 40% and thus it could be a potential resource for the biofuel industry [44,45,48,49].

2.3. Calophyllum inophyllum

Calophyllum inophyllum, also commonly called polang or honne, belongs to the Clusiaceae family, seen in East Africa, India, Australia, and Southeast Asia. It is a medium-sized tree that grows deep in the soil, is exposed to sea sands, and requires rainfall of 750 mm–5000 mm/year [48,50,51]. It grows up to 20 cm long, and the color of the tree changes from pale green to dark green based on its growth condition [52]. The oil content of the seed varies from 65 to 75% [50,53].

2.4. Madhuca indica

Madhuca belongs to the Sapotaceae family and grows to around 20 m in height. Its native country is India [54,55,56]. It adapts easily to arid regions [48,51]. This tree is usually seen in forest regions and can be a viable source of biofuel due to its availability in large quantities, around 60 million tons per year. The seed yield begins after 10 years of maturity and it has a lifespan of 70 years. Mahua tree yields can range from 20 to 200 kg annually, depending on the maturity of the tree [57]. The kernel constitutes 70% of the seed and yields oil of around 50% [56].

2.5. Sapium sebiferum

Sapium sebiferum is also known as the Chinese tallow or stillingia tree and belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family. It is a fast-growing tree and its lifespan is around 70–100 years. This tree can be grown on marginal land and it also adapts to alkaline, saline, drought, and acidic soils. Its native area is Eastern Asia, commonly seen in China and Japan. It is grown in the United States to control soil erosion [58,59,60]. The oil is used in soap production and candle making. It is popularly used as a biofuel [6].

2.6. Azadirachta indica

Azadirachta indica belongs to the Meliaceae family and grows to 12–18 m tall. It is an evergreen tree that grows well in saline, alkaline, dry, and shallow soil. It is native to India, Pakistan, Burma, Malaysia, Japan, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Australia [6,7,44]. It grows well in arid and semiarid regions and it can also adapt its growth to high temperatures and less rainfall of around 250 mm. The seed yields are optimal after 15 years and it has a life expectancy of 150–200 years. The neem seed yield varies from 2 to 4 t/ha/Year. The oil content of the seed is around 30%, whereas the kernel yields around 40–50% [61,62].

2.7. Hevea brasiliensis

Hevea brasiliensis is a rubber tree that belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family. This tree is native to Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand and is widely grown as an economic tree in Nigeria [63]. It grows up to a height of 34 m and requires heavy rainfall, and the seeds are considered waste and are not used in any industrial application [6,51]. The rubber seed contains between 40 and 50% oil [64].

2.8. Sapindus mukorossi

Sapindus mukorossi is also commonly known as soapnut and is found in tropical and subtropical regions around the world, which include, Asia, Himachal Pradesh, America, and Europe. It develops well in loamy and leached soil, which in turn helps to prevent soil erosion. The kernel has 39% oil and consists of 92% triglycerides, thus holding promise for biodiesel production [65,66,67].

2.9. Prunus Sibirica

Siberian apricot (Prunus sibirica) grows in mountainous and temperate regions. It is found in Mongolia, Russia, and the northern part of China. It belongs to the family Rosaceae. It is a shrub that yields about 192,500 tons of seed per year [68]. It grows well with abundant solar radiation, low temperatures, less rainfall, and poor soil. The kernel oil of Siberian apricot can be used as an edible oil, lubricant, cosmetic, and surfactant. It also lowers cholesterol levels and thus can treat cardiovascular diseases [69]. However, this tree is grown to enhance greenery and conserve water and soil. The presence of amygdalin in the seed kernel inhibits its usage for edible purposes because it breaks down into glucose, benzaldehyde, and hydrocyanic acid via the β-glucosidase enzyme. The lower concentration of hydrocyanic acid improves respiration and stimulates digestion, whereas a higher concentration leads to death [70].

2.10. Sterculia foetida

Sterculia foetida, usually known as jangali badam or poon tree in India, belongs to the family of Sterculiaceae under the order of Malvales [71,72]. It is an evergreen tropical tree and is native to Australia, Bangladesh, Djibouti, India, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malaysia, Myanmar, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the Philippines, Somalia, Tanzania, Zanzibar, Uganda, and Oman and is considered exotic in Ghana and Puerto Rico [73,74]. It grows to a height of 40 m and up to 3 m in girth [73,75]. The Sterculia fruit contains 10–15 seeds that appear red and have an almost smooth surface [1]. The seeds are white in the initial stages and turn black when they are ripe. The oil obtained from this seed is commonly used as an illuminate and also in the surface coating industry, the soap making industry, and as a medicine for some skin diseases [72].

2.11. Prunus armeniaca

The largest producer of stone fruit (Prunus armeniaca) in the world is Turkey, and other countries such as Iran and Uzbekistan are also leading in its production. The native stone fruit is found in India and Armenia. Most cultivation of stone fruit is performed in ice-free zones [76]. Currently, the stone fruit is cultivated in Australia, but the cultivation is limited to humid regions because of fungal attacks [77]. The fruit color of the stone fruit changes from yellow to orange, it has a diameter of 1.5–2.5 cm, and the seed is covered by a hard shell. The kernel yield from seeds is approximately 22 to 38% and the oil content is found to be 54.2% [78,79]. Most seeds are considered waste after fruit processing due to the presence of hydrocyanic acid [80].

2.12. Camelia sinensis

Camelia sinensis is an evergreen shrub and belongs to the family Theaceae. Tea seed oil is extracted from tea seeds. The annual production of tea seeds is almost 3–4 tons [81]. It is indigenous to East Asia, India, and Southeast Asia but is currently grown all over the world in tropical and subtropical regions. The kernel content of tea seeds is 47% [82]. Tea seeds contain 29–34% of oil and the presence of saponins is around 11–15% [83]. Tea seed oil contains antioxidants and polyphenols, as well as vitamin E at around 200 mg/L. Thus, tea seeds can be a potent source of biodiesel and used for the extraction of saponins, and vitamin E can also be applied in fuel production [84].

2.13. Elaeis guineensis

Elaeis guineensis is one of the highest oil-yielding crops, grown in tropical countries such as Malayasia and Indonesia [85]. Being a perennial crop, annual sowing is not required [86]. Palm fruit harvesting starts in the third year of plantation, whereas the maximum yield is achieved from the twelfth year until 25 years after plantation [87]. The palm tree’s economic life is around 25 years [88]. Palm fruits usually grow in bunches, around 1000–3000 fruits per bunch. Every bunch weighs around 10–15 kg and the oil content of each bunch is 25% (w/w) [85]. Palm oil is extracted from the mesocarp, the fleshy part of the fruit, at around 49%, and about 50% of the oil is extracted from the palm kernel [85,89]. Palm kernel oil is utilized in soap manufacturing [90]. It has high productivity and a positive energy balance [32].

2.14. Thevetia peruviana

Thevetia peruviana is native to Mexico, Brazil, America, and the West Indies and has adapted to tropical regions around the world. It is an evergreen shrub belonging to the Apocynaceae [91,92]. It is also known as yellow oleander and bush milk in India, Puerto Rico, and Nigeria. It grows up to 4.5–6 m, with green-colored leaves and white and yellow-colored flowers. The seed yield can vary from 400 to 800 fruits based on rainfall and the maturity of the plant. The oil content of the kernel is around 67% [48]. The feedstocks used for biodiesel production are shown in Table 1.

3. Preliminary Steps for Oil Extraction

The preliminary steps include seed harvesting, cleaning, conditioning, and drying before extracting the kernel from the seed. Seeds for oil extraction are collected from the tree using long sticks. The collected seeds are cleaned to remove unwanted twigs, stones, and other impurities. The cleaning of seeds involves the removal of the outer skin and cover of the fruits. The initial step requires the separation of the pulp and seeds [79]. In a few species, the dewaxing of seeds is a preliminary step before oil extraction. In the industry, kernel oil from S. sebiferum L. is extracted by heating the seeds with saturated vapor, since the seeds are covered with wax. The seeds are centrifuged to remove the wax that has melted. The dewaxing of the kernel is important to ensure the properties of biodiesel, such as the cloud point and pour point, and also to provide better viscosity [96]. The process of oil extraction has numerous steps, as shown in Figure 2.

3.1. Kernel Processing

The seeds obtained are subjected to different processes, namely dehulling, kernel drying, oil extraction, and the purification of the extracted oil. The seeds are processed to separate the husk and kernels from the seeds. The husk obtained from seeds can be used to extract more biologically active compounds, and the kernel is employed for oil extraction. Thus, the oil is collected for further purification and processing, and the oil cake can be utilized for various applications, which include its use as a biogas or biofertilizer, enzyme production, animal feeding, and as briquettes for power generation, as shown in Figure 3.

3.2. Decortication of Seeds

The dehulling of the seeds is an essential step in obtaining the kernel after the cleaning, conditioning, and drying of oilseeds. The removal of the hard seed coat results in the kernel and also increases the nutritional content and reduces the antinutritional constituents such as tannins, pigments, and insoluble dietary fiber (IDF). Kernel usage in the oil extraction process also reduces energy usage and equipment wear [97,98]. Usually, oil seeds are dehulled to enhance the oil yield and quality. The use of whole oil seeds leads to the accumulation of pigments and impurities in the oil. The protein content of the meal can be increased to 48.3% from 36% by dehulling [99]. Mostly, manual shelling is performed to separate the kernel from the seed, which requires high labor input and has low efficiency. Decorticated Jatropha seeds’ oil content may vary from 40 to 60% based on their variety [100]. Thevetia peruviana shells are removed before the extraction of the oil, due to the presence of semi-oily material in the seed coat and also the presence of some hexane-soluble compounds. The typical methods utilized in the shelling process include cutting, rub-tearing, extrusion, and impacting [101]. However, the dehulling efficiency of oil seeds depends upon several factors, which include the size and shape of the seed, the kernel’s adherence to the hull, the moisture content, and the capacity of the seed to bear mechanical loading [102]. Abrasive dehulling is employed to remove the outer coat of the seed layer, which has an abrasive surface, coated on the drum or rotor surfaces, which is also known as pearling [103,104].

3.3. Processing of Kernel

Oil extraction from the kernel is possible by removing the outer shell of the fruit and thus obtaining the kernel, which is dried to obtain the preferred moisture content [18]. The softening of the seed is done to recover the kernels from the hard shell. In some species, such as Sterculia foetida, the soaking of seeds is carried out to remove the powder layer in the seed and to obtain the kernel, so as to increase the oil extraction efficiency [95]. This particular step can avoid the absorption of the oil by the powdery layer. Hence, seed processing is an essential step for oil extraction. Seeds are manually cracked to open the kernel or by the application of stompers [105]. The manual processing of seeds is a time-consuming and laborious process. Apricot seeds are processed by immersing the seed in water for 10–20 min before breaking the shell [79]. The kernels are separated from the seeds, cleaned, and stored for oil extraction [6,105].

3.4. Kernel Drying

The moisture content is one of the main factors involved in achieving the maximum efficiency. The presence of moisture content of around 15% yields more oil in both mechanical and solvent extraction methods [20]. Seeds are dried at 50 to 70 °C until they reach the desired moisture content. Weighing the oilseeds constantly throughout the day facilitates the drying process [18,105,106]. The occasional stirring of the sample also ensures uniformity in drying [20]. The drying of the seed has a greater influence on the oil yield because the tissues are softened and the oil viscosity is greatly reduced [107]. Sufficient drying of the kernel not only softens the cellular structure but also increases the coagulation of proteins and collapses the oil cells, which increases the oil yield [108]. The high moisture content of the kernel increases its plasticity and reduces the compression strength [109,110]. A larger amount of water in the kernel generates an inhomogeneous layer between the lipids and water and thus the diffusivity of the lipids in the solvent is reduced, which in turn reduces the yield of oil [111,112,113].

3.5. Purification of Oil

The oil extracted by mechanical means may have several impurities, such as solids, dust particles, free fatty acids, water, phosphorous, and oxidative metals. The removal of these impurities is an essential step to avoid oil deterioration and prevent filter clogging in the engine when using crude oil. Impurities also have a negative impact on biodiesel production [114]. Processes such as sedimentation, centrifugation, and filtration are applied for the removal of impurities [115]. Sedimentation is usually applied in small processing units. Filtration of the oil is carried out by gravity, band, or bag filters, or filter presses and leaf filters [114]. The FFA content is reduced by the esterification of the catalyst, steam distillation, and the extraction of alcohols [116].

3.6. Storage of Oil

The oil quality can deteriorate due to several reactions, such as hydrolysis, polymerization, and oxidation, when it is stored in improper conditions [117]. Many factors, such as temperature variations, exposure to light and air, the presence of volatile gaseous substances, and water condensation, will induce oxidation. The oil must be stored in a cool and dry room [114].

3.7. Seed Cake

The by-product obtained after oil extraction is the seed cake, which has leftover oil content, usually dependent on the extraction process. High oil content is present in the oil cake, which is subjected to mechanical extraction rather than chemical extraction, thus increasing its energy value [43]. The pressed cake has high levels of nutrients and protein and more calorific content after oil extraction [118]. Thus, the pressed cake can be utilized for fertilizer, fuel, and biogas production. The use of the Jatropha seed cake showed a significant increase in the yield of edible crops such as Pennisetum glaucum, Brassica oleracea, and Oryza sativa as well as an increase in the seed yield of Jatropha curcas [43]. The phorbol esters present in the seed cake are completely degradable in soil and have no impact on other microbial communities in the soil [119]. The seed cake can be directly burned as fuel due to its high calorific value [43]. The conversion of the seed cake into charcoal briquettes is beneficial compared to cake briquettes. The benefits of converting the pressed cake to charcoal briquettes include an increase in the energy content of the fuel, reduced weight, and a reduction in smoke while using it as a fuel [114]. The seed cake is also used as a resource for biogas production, and the yield varies depending on the type of extraction and the inoculum used in the biogas reactor [43]. The slurry from the biogas reactor can be diverted to fields as a nutrient for plants [120]. Solid-state fermentation of the oil cake is also possible to produce enzymes [121]. The use of seed cakes as animal feed is the best option to increase the nutritional content of the feed, but the presence of phorbol and other antinutritional compounds inhibits its usage as a feed. Further research on the detoxification of the seed cake is required for its application as an animal feed [119,122].

4. Current Status of Oil Extraction Techniques (Kernel Oil Extraction Techniques)

4.1. Oil Extraction Methods

Oil can be extracted from seeds using various techniques, which include mechanical extraction, solvent extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasonic-assisted extraction, and enzymatic extraction. On a commercial scale, only two methods of oil extraction are widely reported, which are mechanical extraction and solvent extraction. Both extraction methods require seed drying before oil extraction. The whole seeds are commonly used in mechanical extraction, whereas only kernels are used for solvent extraction [9,43]. The extraction of oil from oil seeds is a midstream process, whereas the growth of oil crops and the pre-treatment of seeds are upstream processes. The downstream process comprises biofuel production. The various methods of oil extraction are shown in Figure 4.

4.2. Mechanical Extraction Methods

Oil extraction can be achieved by mechanical extraction. Generally, expellers or screw presses are applied for the extraction of oil from seeds. The process is inefficient because the yield is lower compared to solvent extraction. Around 8–14% of the oil may be left in the oil cake [6]. Extraction through the ram process yields about 60–65%, whereas the application of an engine-driven screw press increases the yield compared to the ram press to 68–80%. The equipment is designed for a particular seed, which reduces the oil yield for other seeds. The yield of oil can be enhanced by the application of heat and pressure [6]. In a screw press, the cooked seeds showed a high yield of oil ranging from 89 to 91% [9].
Mechanical extraction is divided into two methods, namely cold pressing and hot pressing [123]. Seed pre-treatment (cooking) is an essential step where thermal heat is used for hot pressing, whereas cold pressing is done without heat treatment [124]. Cold-pressed oil has its nutritional content preserved and is more valued by consumers [125]. Hot pressing yields more oil than cold pressing [126]. Hot pressing is the best option for the synthesis of biodiesel.
A screw-type press was used for the extraction of oil from sterculia seeds [95]. Calophyllum oil can be extracted from seeds by using either a hydraulic or screw press [6]. Different researchers have used various methods of mechanical extraction because the process is inexpensive [127]. However, mechanical means of oil extraction need further processing to improve the oil quality, such as filtering and degumming processes [6]. The density, free fatty acids, acid value, and viscosity were found to be higher than for solvent extraction [20].

4.3. Solvent Extraction

Solvent extraction is a method of obtaining components from solids with the help of a solvent [128]. The selection of the solvent for oil extraction is based on its low viscosity to ease the free circulation of the solvent. Generally, oil is extracted from seeds using a Soxhlet apparatus, where contact between the solid and liquid is established to extract the oil from the seeds. The extraction of oil using a hexane solvent was found to yield a large amount of oil. The quality of the oil extracted using hexane was found to be high compared to mechanical extraction. The resulting biofuel had properties such as a high cetane number, calorific value, and oxidation stability [20]. There are many solvents used for oil extraction, which include hexane, chloroform, and methanol [129]. Commonly, n-hexane is used over other solvents such as petroleum ether, tetrahydrofuran, methanol, and chloroform based on the amount of unsaponifiable content in the extracted oil. Sterculia seeds yielded 57% of oil content when using n-hexane as a solvent, and Jatropha kernels yielded around 41% of oil [130,131]. Various parameters have an impact on the yield of oil, which include the sample size, solvent-to-seed ratio, extraction time, boiling temperature of solvents, particle size of seeds, solvent type, extraction temperature, and moisture content of seeds [128]. Finally, the obtained hexane and oil mixture is exposed to evaporation to obtain the extracted oil. Solvent extraction is feasible for large-scale applications. This type of extraction takes more time than other methods and it harms the environment due to the generation of more wastewater and the evaporation of volatile compounds; there is also a risk to human health due to the use of flammable chemicals [6].

4.4. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Method

In the ultrasound-assisted method, materials are immersed in a solvent and subjected to ultrasonic vibrations. The range of vibration created by ultrasound varies from 18 kHz to 100 MHz [132]. This technology is used currently to extract value-added compounds from different bio-sources and has been commercialized by various manufacturers [133]. Microscopic bubbles are formed and collapsed, emitting large amounts of energy, pressure, and mechanical shear. This technique targets particular compounds to extract from the intracellular to extracellular level [134]. The disruption of cell walls is seen, which releases oil into the solvent. The benefits of this method are the shorter time and lower solvent utilization, which in turn also have a positive impact on the environment [84]. The use of ultrasound on oil seeds reduced the number of cycles required in the Soxhlet process and also increased the oil yield to 75% [135]. There is no variation in fatty acid composition when applying the ultrasound technique [136]. This technique is a successful method for the extraction of essential oils and lipid molecules from oil seeds [137,138]. The advantages of this process include high extraction yields, less time, and less energy consumption [139,140]. This method is the best method for the extraction of oil and has been found to be a developing technology even in the food industry. The major drawback in the usage of ultrasound for oil extraction is in the development stage, because no report has been conducted on commercial oil seed pressing units. The grinding of seeds is required for ultrasound extraction. An economic analysis of the ultrasound extraction of oil seeds is required to utilize this technique on an industrial scale [136]. The kernel powder of an exotic fruit, Canarium odontophyllum, was investigated for maximum oil extraction using optimization techniques, and the optimal conditions were determined to be as follows: ultrasound amplitude level: 38.30%, n-hexane to kernel powder ratio: 50:1 in mL/g, extraction time: 45.79 min, and oil extraction yield: 63.48%. Thus, ultrasound-assisted oil extraction increases the maximum oil yield [141].

4.5. Microwave-Assisted Extraction Method

This technique utilizes a micro-oven for extraction, through which various plant materials can be extracted successfully [142]. This method is a combination of conventional solvent extraction methods and microwave extraction methods [143]. An electromagnetic field is created by microwave irradiation, which enhances the oil extraction process. This technique is found to be an energy-efficient technique due to the lower energy requirement. Oil is extracted in less time and the consumption of the solvent is found to be minimal, and it gives a higher yield than expellers and solvent extraction methods [144]. Microwave extraction disrupts the cell wall and lipid fractions and releases the oil. The oil released from the cell forms a liquid phase, which is further separated [84]. Microwave-treated seeds show better storability as feedstocks. Microwave-treated seeds were stored for six months at 30 °C and found to have lesser acid values, small changes in peroxide values, and reduced water content [145]. This ensures the better storage capacity of seeds for further processing. Researchers have found that the treatment of seeds through microwave also enhances the oxidation stability of the oil, the nutraceutical content, and the oil yield [146]. Thus, the microwave technique can be used in the food industry, especially for the production of bioactive compounds from plant materials.

4.6. Enzymatic Extraction

The aqueous enzymatic method is a promising technology utilized to extract oil from plant material [147,148]. The success of this technique mainly depends on the proper usage of enzymes [149]. Enzymes can also be employed for oil extraction, and the yield is found to be high. The seed kernel cell wall is ruptured and the oil compounds are discharged into the extraction media. This technique is eco-friendly since solvents are not utilized in this process. The lower processing cost of the oil cake obtained after oil extraction is another advantage of this technique [84]. The primary location of lipid storage in oil seeds is found in cell organelles called oleosomes [29]. Cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose, and a small amount of pectin make up these walls [150]. The most crucial stage in the AEE process is breaking the cell wall. The application of the AEE technique utilizes hydrolytic enzymes such as cellulase, protease, pectinase, and hemicellulose. The optimum conditions for oil extraction have the greatest impact on the oil yield [151]. During enzyme treatment, the Camelina oleifera kernel yield ranged from 26 to 49%. This process is still not applied on a commercial scale due to the high enzyme costs [152]. This issue can be addressed by the production of enzymes from oil cakes through solid fermentation [84]. Although the use of immobilized enzymes lowers the overall cost, the reaction rate of the enzyme decreases due to steric hindrance [43]. The combined usage of enzymes and ultrasonication can increase the oil yield, as well as offering a lower acid value, higher iodine value, and similar fatty acid composition, regardless of the extraction process [153].

5. Fatty Acid Composition

A crucial characteristic of the yield of any biodiesel feedstock is the fatty acid composition. The oil composition varies in terms of the fatty acid proportion of any kernel oil based on the feedstock quality, the environment, and the geographic location [95]. Most of the non-edible oils, including Pongamia, have palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acids [154]. Biodiesel usually has a high percentage of unsaturated fatty acids, which generally undergo autoxidation. Additionally, oxidative deterioration negatively affects the acid value and kinematic viscosity. In contrast, biodiesel with a large number of unsaturated fatty acids has better flow characteristics than biodiesel containing only saturated fatty acids. In general, the use of biodiesel in cold areas is constrained by poor cold flow characteristics [52]. Therefore, the oil yield from seed kernels is a crucial characteristic in selecting any feedstock as a source of biodiesel. Table 1 displays the estimated results and oil content of various non-edible vegetable oil feedstocks. A higher biodiesel yield is based on the composition of fatty acids in the feedstock. Some non-edible oils have a distribution and composition of fatty acids that typically include aliphatic molecules with a carboxyl group at the end of a straight chain. Straight fatty acid chains are the major biodiesel components, and the most widely used ones are palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), and linolenic (C18:3) acids [12]. However, some feedstocks have fatty acids other than the usual ones in substantial amounts. The fatty acid compositions have a negative impact on the fuel quality and attributes of biodiesel [12].
Furthermore, it has been suggested that biodiesel containing a high concentration of methyl oleate (a monounsaturated fatty acid) may exhibit outstanding ignition quality, fuel stability, and flow qualities at low temperatures [12,51]. On the other hand, the fatty acid content will influence the iodine value, and a lubricating oil will quickly deteriorate at greater iodine levels [155]. Saturated fatty acid alkyl ester enhanced the cloud point, cetane number, and stability of methyl ester, according to Sahoo and Das [156]. In general, non-edible oil contains a large proportion of double carbon chains (polyunsaturated acid), which suggests that it has more unsaturated fatty acids than saturated carbon chains [12]. As a result, this structural fatty acid composition will impact the physicochemical characteristics of biodiesel, such as its viscosity, heat of combustion, and cetane number [6,51]. Table 2 shows the fatty acid compositions of various feedstocks.

6. Biodiesel Production Technologies

The direct usage of vegetable oil from diesel engines is impossible due to the viscosity of the oil, free fatty acid content, gum formation, and polymerization of the oil while storing it for further processing and also during combustion. The major problems that restrict the use of oil directly in the engine are carbon deposits and oil thickening [161]. To overcome these critical problems, the conversion of the oil into biodiesel is necessary. There are technologies available that can convert these oils into biodiesel, including micro-emulsification, dilution, transesterification, and pyrolysis. Among these methods, the most widely reported method is the transesterification process [162]. Fatty acids are converted into esters and glycerol as a by-product in the transesterification process. A large amount of methanol is required for the conversion of oil into methyl esters. Methanol is preferred over ethanol due to its low cost [163]. Acid or alkali catalysts can be utilized for the transesterification process, which are mostly chosen based on the free fatty acid content. Enzyme application in biodiesel production was also reported by previous researchers [164]. Numerous process variables are involved in biodiesel production, including the temperature, catalyst, molar ratio of oil to methanol, and agitation speed [165]. A few biodiesel production operating conditions are shown in Table 3.

6.1. Homogenous Catalyst

Most catalysts are used in liquid form for both alkali- and acid-based transesterification processes. The reaction between alcohol and fatty acids is known as transesterification and also called alcoholysis. Triglycerides are converted into biodiesel via three steps. In the initial step, the formation of tetrahedral occurs, followed by the conversion of intermediate tetrahedral into diglycerides, and the last step is catalyst recovery through proton transfer [173]. These steps are repeated for each fatty acid molecule to form biodiesel and glycerol [174]. Homogenous catalysts are usually employed in industry, but researchers are still focusing on the usage of heterogenous catalysts to maximize the yield.

6.2. Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterification

The most common method used in laboratories at the pilot-scale level and also on a commercial scale is the utilization of alkali catalysts in biodiesel production [175,176]. The catalysts employed for fuel production include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, alkaline metal hydroxides, potassium carbonate, sodium carbonate, and alkoxides [177]. High yields in less time and also the low cost of the catalyst characterize this method of biodiesel production [161,177]. The use of alkali catalysts is favored when the feedstock has low free fatty acid content in the oil, preferably less than 3% [178]. However, it has a few disadvantages: it is energy-intensive, the recovery of glycerol is challenging, the separation of the catalyst from biodiesel is difficult, and wastewater is generated during separation [176,179]. Potassium hydroxide has been used as a catalyst for biodiesel production from stone fruit kernel oil and palm kernel oil, yielding around 95.8 and 96% [77,94]. The average transesterification yield was 95.8% when utilizing 100 g PKO, 20.0% ethanol (wt% PKO), 1.0% NaOH, a 60 °C reaction temperature, and 90 min of reaction time [172]. The optimum methanol-to-oil molar ratio of 7.5:1, a catalyst-to-oil ratio of 2.09% w/w of oil, and a reaction temperature of 60 °C resulted in the highest yield of 80.5% biodiesel from Jatropha curcas [166]. Thus, the usage of low-cost alkali catalysts is favorable for biodiesel production for maximum yields.

6.3. Acid Catalysts

Usually, when the feedstock has high free fatty acid content, low quality, and a low price, acid catalysts are used for biodiesel production [161,179]. Pongamia kernel oil and Calophyllum kernel oil are high in FFA content, thus requiring an acid catalyst for transesterification [50,168]. The acid catalysts used for biodiesel production are phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid. Biodiesel fuel properties are mainly dependent on the feedstock fatty acid composition and the methyl esters formed during transesterification [50]. Biodiesel production through this method usually employs a larger amount of methanol than required. This method is slow compared to the alkali-based catalyst method, and the use of high concentrations of acids is required [163,180]. The water content present in the oil also has a significant impact on the biodiesel yield. The purification of biodiesel is tedious and capital-intensive.

6.4. Two-Stage Transesterification

In this technique, both acid-based and alkali-based transesterification are performed, because of the high FFA content of oil and the reaction mechanism, as shown in the literature [178]. If the FFA content is above 3%, a high biodiesel yield cannot be achieved in single-stage transesterification; hence, to optimize the yield, double esterification is employed [181]. Initially, the oil is subjected to acid transesterification, where FFA is converted into FAME [182,183,184]. After acid transesterification, alkali transesterification is performed to maximize the yield [185,186,187]. Biodiesel fuels from Karanja, mahua, and a mixture of both Karanja and mahua at a ratio of 50:50 were studied and produced yields of around 98.6, 95.71 and 94% through two-stage transesterification [171]. Mahua biodiesel synthesis was optimized using a central composite rotatable design to identify the optimum concentration of acid usage in the esterification reaction. The acid value was reduced to less than 1% after treating the oil with 1.24% v/v H2SO4, a 0.32 v/v methanol-to-oil ratio, and 1.26 h reaction time at 60 °C [167]. Few studies report the usage of two-stage transesterification using alkali catalysts to increase the yield. Double-step transesterification using an alkali catalyst for both times increased the production to 10% [188].
Sterculia oil was taken into a three-necked flask and kept above a hot plate magnetic stirrer. The oil was mixed with a methanol-to-oil ratio of 12:1 and 1% anhydrous sulfuric acid was added. The oil was continuously stirred using a magnetic stirrer at 1200 rpm for around 3 h. After three hours, the sample was transferred into a separating funnel to remove the excess methanol, and the lower layer had free fatty acid content, which was washed with distilled water. Then, the oil was dried using anhydrous CaCl2 for one day. The oil was filtered using filter paper and again anhydrous Na2SO4 was used for drying for around three hours. Finally, the sample was filtered using filter paper. The oil obtained from the lower layer of the separating funnel was further transesterified. Then, the oil was poured into the separating funnel for the separation of the biodiesel and glycerol. The biodiesel obtained was washed with distilled water, dried using 100 g of anhydrous CaCl2 for one day, and filtered [1].

6.5. Heterogeneous Catalysts

The major obstacle in commercializing biodiesel production is the price of feedstocks and the processing costs of feedstocks. The use of heterogeneous catalysts in biodiesel production overcomes the difficulties related to homogenous catalysts. The benefits of heterogeneous catalysts include catalyst recycling, reducing the feedstock level involved in processing, and minimizing the processing costs. They can also be utilized on a commercial scale without any need for further purification steps [189,190]. Heterogeneous catalysts including acidic and basic catalysts are vital in biodiesel production [189,191]. The solid catalysts are categorized based on the temperature as high-temperature and low-temperature catalysts. The generation of wastewater during the production of alkali catalysts is avoided during the use of heterogeneous catalysts. Thus, the requirement of a wastewater treatment unit is eliminated in a biofuel plant that utilizes heterogeneous catalysts. The need for the removal of the spent catalyst from the biodiesel is also avoided by the use of heterogeneous catalysts [178]. The biodiesel purity is also almost 99% and it can decrease the water content in the medium [192]. It is cheap compared to homogenous catalysts [178]. The reaction mechanism of a heterogeneous catalyst is similar to that of a homogenous catalyst, irrespective of the type of catalyst (acid or alkali). Acid transesterification by heterogeneous catalysts will be beneficial when using low-quality feedstocks [179]. This type of catalyst creates fewer environmental problems than the conventional catalysts [192]. Feedstocks that are acidic in nature can be treated with this type of catalyst [190]. A heterogeneous alkali catalyst in biodiesel production is much preferred due to the ease of production and the refining process of the fuel. It reduces the amount of water required for purification and also reduces the cost by downsizing the equipment required for the separation or purification process [193]. A copper-doped zinc oxide nanocatalyst was shown to be an effective catalyst for biodiesel production and to achieve a greater yield. It could also be recycled five times [169].

6.6. Solid Acid Catalysts

Solid acid catalysts are an eco-friendly alternative to liquid acids. The use of a solid acid catalyst allows the product to be separated solely by filtration [194]. The primary characteristics of solid acid catalysts can be modified in an economical and environmentally friendly manner to reduce the overall cost of fuel products on an industrial scale [195]. Researchers have used metal oxides as a support for the development of solid acid catalysts [196]. The majority of these oxides, such as zinc oxides, zirconium oxides, iron oxides, tungsten oxides, tin oxides, and titanium oxides, are of transition metal group origin and are of interest to industry and research groups. Sulfonated zirconia, tungstened zirconia, and CaO zirconia are promising solid acid catalysts for the conversion of triglycerides to fatty acid alkyl esters [197]. A cobalt-doped zinc oxide nanocatalyst was used for biodiesel production from Mesua ferrea oil, which achieved maximum biodiesel conversion of 98.03% after 3 h at 333.15 K with 2.5 wt% catalyst loading and a 1:9 oil-to-methanol molar ratio under optimal reaction conditions [198]. TiO2-Cu2O nanoparticles were effective for biodiesel production, with a 60% conversion rate of triglycerides from thumba oil [199].

6.7. Natural Heterogeneous Catalysts

The application of biomass to produce heterogeneous catalysts is possible and it can be also utilized for biodiesel production [200,201]. The production of catalysts from natural sources will have an impact on the cost of the process and at the same time will be eco-friendly. Catalyst recycling is also possible after the separation of biodiesel and glycerol [202]. Solid catalyst production is complicated and requires trained personnel and also a time-consuming process [201]. Calcium-based natural sources are also used in biodiesel synthesis, including eggshell, dolomite, limestone, calcite, hydroxyapatite, and cuttlebone [203]. Researchers studied the effect of eggshell and dolomite, which yielded biodiesel at around 95 and 98% [201,203]. During calcination, calcium oxide is formed, which acts as a catalyst [202].

6.8. Enzyme-Based Transesterification

Enzyme-based catalysts alleviate the problems caused by the usage of conventional acid or alkali catalysts, which are wastewater generation, catalyst removal, energy-intensive processes, and feedstock pre-treatment. Lipase is an enzyme used for the transesterification process, produced by various microbes, plants, and animals [204,205]. Enzymes are quite high in price, but this can be addressed by immobilizing the enzyme. The utilization of enzymes can increase the efficiency of the process, thereby increasing the yield of biodiesel [206,207]. Glycerol separation from biodiesel was found to be superior to the alkaline process [161]. The major advantage of utilizing enzymes as catalysts is that the feedstock has high FFA content and also can be used without any pre-treatment [204,208]. The temperature required for transesterification is 30–40 °C. Methyl ester reduction is visualized in alkaline catalysts for high FFA oils [161,205]. In enzyme transesterification, triglycerides are transformed to partial glycerides and partial glycerides to FFA, which is further converted into methyl esters while reacting with methanol [209]. Thus it favors the production of methyl esters from oil with high FFA content. Methanol and ethanol usage in enzyme transesterification hinder the production process because of the inhibitory effect on enzymes [210]. This inhibitory effect is created by the alcohol in the lipase, and this can be overcome by the batch-wise addition of alcohol [211]. The usage of solvents and alcohol has an impact on the enzyme activity [212]. The use of enzyme catalysts in production for biofuel plants is hampered by the high production costs and long processing times [161,213]. The transesterification of oil through enzymes and its maximum production rate depend on the process parameters and catalytic activity. Lipase extract powder obtained from Leonotis nepetifolia seed was used for enzyme-catalyzed biodiesel production using Leonotis nepetifolia oil, commercial olive oil, and waste cooking oil as substrates, and the yields were around 70 to 75% [214].

6.9. Transesterification Using Ultrasound

The usage of ultrasound for transesterification increases the mixing of reactants and maximizes the yield [115]. It increases the mixing of the alcohol and oil phases and also increases the reaction rate [215]. There is less energy usage than mechanical stirring in conventional systems [216]. Higher conversion rates are achieved as the ultrasonic power is increased. Furthermore, raising the ultrasonic frequency from 1 MHz to 3 MHz results in higher conversion rates (48.7 to 79.5%) for the same reaction time [217]. A few studies revealed that the combination of ultrasound and microwave irradiation was efficient and the yield of methyl esters from rice bran oil was around 97.74% [218].

6.10. Microwave Transesterification

Microwave transesterification is another technique used for biodiesel production. The microwave-assisted method has many advantages, including high yields, reduced time, and an eco-friendly method [219,220]. The microwave method increases the collision of molecules of reactant molecules [219,221,222]. The heat increases in the feedstock, which creates uniform heat transfer. The disadvantage of the microwave method is the safety issues on a commercial scale [221,223]. Biodiesel production from Camellia using microwave energy was investigated. The parameters, namely the reaction time, catalyst load, and molar ratio of methanol to oil, were investigated to maximize the yield using an RSM-BBD design. The highest biodiesel yield of 95.31% (desirability of 95%) was obtained at the reaction time of 5.85 min, a catalyst concentration of 1.26 wt%, and a molar ratio of 6.91 [224].

6.11. Direct Transesterification

Direct transesterification eliminates the need for the processing of seeds and thus avoids the pre-treatment of seeds and other related processing steps. The direct conversion of fatty acids to esters is achieved through this technique [225]. Oil extraction and transesterification reactions progress in a single step in the presence of alcohols, catalysts, and co-solvents [226,227,228]. The cell wall breakage of oil-bearing seeds is the major challenge in direct transesterification, which inhibits solvent diffusion; thereby, optimizing the process parameters is essential to achieve maximum yield [229]. The process can be enhanced by the utilization of ultrasound- and microwave-assisted direct transesterification [230,231]. The usage of sulfuric acid in direct transesterification to degrade the cell wall and increase the yield was studied [232]. Jatropha was subjected to direct transesterification, with a 95% yield at 60 °C for 30 min in the presence of alkali catalyst NaOH 0.15 N [233]. Sulfuric acid was used as a catalyst at 0.87 M at a reaction time of 240 min at 56 °C, with a yield of 93% of biodiesel from rubber seeds [234]. Therefore, the usage of reactive transesterification yields more biodiesel and also eliminates the preliminary step of seed processing.

7. Properties and Characteristics of Non-Edible Biodiesel

Numerous non-edible feedstock properties have been analyzed for the development of biofuel [7]. The determination of the properties of various feedstocks has become demanding due to the increased usage of alternative fuels. The physical and chemical properties of various feedstocks of kernel oil are shown in Table 4.

7.1. Kinematic Viscosity and Density

The viscosity and density of biodiesel are the foremost fuel properties in ensuring the quality of biodiesel [235]. Kinematic viscosity is defined as the resistance of a liquid to flow. This value is an indication of the thickness of the oil. This has been evaluated by considering the total time taken for a specified amount of fuel to flow through the orifice at a specified size [128]. It has a major impact on the working of the fuel injection system, especially at lower temperatures, when the fuel has higher viscosity [236]. Soot formation engine deposits were the main problem found with a higher-viscosity fuel. The kinematic viscosity of Sterculia oil was found to be 4.92 mm2/s [72], 6.0 mm2/s [160], 3.96 mm2/s [1], and 4.72 mm2/s [237]. The values are within the limit specified in the ASTM D445 standard. The viscosity of stone fruit kernel oil was found to be 34.82 mm2/s, whereas that of the biodiesel was 4.26 mm2/s. Thus, the biodiesel produced met the ASTM and EN standards. The density must be tested at a temperature of 15 °C [128]. The density of the fuel directly affects its properties, such as the cetane number, viscosity, and heating value [238]. The density also has a direct impact on the engine output. The combustion quality of fuel is greatly influenced by the biofuel density. Most of the biodiesels produced from kernel oils are within the range of the ASTM standards’ limit for density, which is within 860–900 kg/m3 [52].

7.2. Flash Point

The flash point is one of the key parameters that determines the safety of a fuel. The flash point of a biofuel is determined by exposing the fuel to heat. The fuel ignites at a specific temperature and creates a spark, known as the flash point. Usually, biodiesel has a high flash point compared to diesel. The flash point of biodiesel usually lies above 150 °C, while diesel has a range of 55–66 °C. The flash point of Pongamia is 180 °C, which is higher than that of kernel oils [239], followed by tea seed oil at 165 °C [240], and palm kernel oil has the lowest flash point at 100 °C.

7.3. Cloud and Pour Point

The cloud and pour points are important fuel properties that ensure their usage in low-temperature regions. Biodiesel usually forms wax-like crystals when the fuel is cooled. The pour point is the temperature at which the fuel forms a gel. Usually, the cloud and pour points are higher in biodiesel than diesel. The cloud and pour points are mainly dependent on the fatty acid composition and also vary depending on the type of feedstock. The pour point of biodiesel produced from tea seed oil is one of the lowest ever reported for a biodiesel fuel at −5 °C [170].

7.4. Cetane Number

The cetane number is a significant parameter that measures the ignition quality of a fuel [241]. The cetane number also provides data on the ignition delay of the fuel. The higher the cetane number, the lower the ignition delay. A low cetane number leads to incomplete combustion and raises the particulate exhaust emissions. The cetane number of biodiesel is higher than that of diesel fuel [163]. Pongamia pinnata has a high cetane number of 58 compared to other kernel oils [239].

7.5. Acid Number

The acid number of a feedstock is measured by the extent of carboxylic acid present in the fatty acids [241]. The acid value is also a measure of the mg KOH necessary to counteract the free fatty acids [242]. A high acid value can cause more corrosion in the fuel system [77]. Siberian apricot (0.25), stone fruit kernel (0.25), and Sterculia biodiesel (0.14) have the lowest acid numbers compared to other kernel oils [73,77,159].

7.6. Calorific Value

Calorific value is an essential parameter for the selection of feedstocks. The calorific value of biodiesel is usually lower than that of diesel due to the oxygen content of biodiesel [243]. Table 5 shows that the calorific value of Jatropha is higher (41.17 MJ/Kg) and Pongamia has the lowest calorific value (35.56 MJ/Kg) [239,244].

7.7. Iodine Number

The iodine number is an indicator of double bonds, which influence the unsaturation degree of biodiesel. This property has an influence on the oxidation stability, and it is related to other fuel properties such as the viscosity, cold flow, and cetane number. Rubber seed biodiesel has a high iodine number of 144, and mahua seed has a lower iodine number of 74.2 [158,245].
Table 4. Physicochemical properties of various kernel oils.
Table 4. Physicochemical properties of various kernel oils.
PropertyUnitJ. curcas
[162]
M.
indica
[57]
P. pinnata
[147]
A.
indica
[56]
H. brasiliensis [7]S. sebifeum [8]S. mukorossi oil
[3]
P.
armeniaca [1]
C. inophyllum
[4]
P. sibirica [6]C.
sinensis [2]
E.
guineensis
[5]
S. foetida [9]T. peruviana [86]
Density at 15 °C (kg/m3) 9189209319120.920---943879.7907874955890
Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C mm2s−1 3724.584620.538.1046.92-34.8226.6424.34274.034236
Free
fatty acids (%)
%----23.47-----2.7-3.10-
Saponification number mg KOH g−1-----206.35191.83173204.3-195.2---
Iodine value g I
100 g−1
8271---137.52113.1510377-106.859--
Acid value mg KOH g−1 --30 42.2-4.121.6540.4-0.2060.26.171-
Calorific valueMJ
kg−1
37.53639.1223239.72--38.6937.81-37.1441.336.44639.8
Flash point°C238232226214 ---238175 119-190
Pour point°C410−210 ---6 −8−6−3
Cloud point°C915119 ---9 -21-
Cetane number-3957 3149.73----49.243.857.8--
Oxidation stabilityhour---12.4 ----2.7---6
Table 5. Physicochemical properties of kernel biodiesel.
Table 5. Physicochemical properties of kernel biodiesel.
PropertyUnitJ.
curcas
[6]
M.
indica [5]
P.
pinnata
[7]
A.
indica [62]
H. brasiliensis [4]S.
sebifeum
[8]
S.
mukororsi
[67]
P.
armeniaca [1]
C.
inophyllum
[53]
P. sibirica
[2]
C.
sinensis
[10]
E.
guineensis [3]
S.
foetida
[9]
T.
peruviana [91]
Density at 15 °C (kg/m3) 880916890820860900876-868.6878.2884 875875
Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C mm2s−1 4.43.984.853.25.814.814.634.264.74.3414.953.3664.33
Iodine value % 74.289 144 104.70 - -9869.9
Acid value mg KOH g−1 0.48 0.42 0.90.70.140.25 0.25 -0.140.057
Calorific valueMJ kg−1 41.1739.435.5639.6 40.0239.0439.38-37.5- 42.279
Flash point°C163129180120130137140105141.517316510016275
Pour point°C 6 2-80−4−88 −5−3 +3
Cloud point°C45 94 −1−410- 3−13+12
Cetane number-57.151584836.5505650.45 48.851.1-5461.5
Oxidation stabilityh6 67.1 0.61.207.156.012.7 -

8. LCA of Biodiesel Production

Biodiesel produced from non-edible oil sources is considered environmentally friendly since the carbon emissions during combustion are absorbed by crops. Apart from these advantages, numerous benefits of biodiesel synthesis are reported compared to fossil fuels. However, the large plantation of energy crops may lead to deforestation and thus eradicate the available natural carbon sink. The GHG emissions are high due to the cultivation and fertilization of non-edible plants, energy spent on oil extraction and biodiesel synthesis, and use of chemicals in oil extraction and biodiesel synthesis. Thus, a life cycle impact assessment (LCA) for biodiesel using various feedstocks has to be performed to understand the complete impact of biodiesel synthesis. The LCA of biodiesel production from substandard resources such as sewage sludge and used vegetable oil was investigated. The biodiesel synthesis from sewage sludge and vegetable oil decreased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 79.7 and 24.5%, respectively, compared to sulfur diesel [246]. Sapindus mukorossi plantations showed a higher impact due to the fertilizers used and contributed the most to the global warming potential, primary energy demand, acidification potential, eutrophication ozone depletion, and abiotic depletion potential. Thus, the cultivation of these plants needs to be improved from an environmental perspective [247]. Biodiesel from rubber seed oil showed lower carbon mitigation potential than fossil fuel-based diesel and conformed with global sustainability standards [248]. Compared to rapeseed biodiesel, palm biodiesel has a higher energy ratio; thus, palm oil would be a more sustainable feedstock for the manufacturing of biodiesel. A GHG assessment of palm and rapeseed biodiesel showed no adverse effects on the environment because the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere was significantly lower than the amount of CO2 absorbed. However, this study emphasizes the utilization of existing plantations rather than deforestation to promote biodiesel and valuable by-product synthesis from the seed cake, to enhance the economy of the process. The usage of scrubland to grow energy crops is strongly recommended for higher CO2 assimilation [248]. The agricultural and industrial tasks of biodiesel production are shown in Figure 5.

9. Sustainable Biodiesel Production

Successful biofuel production in terms of sustainability can be achieved by the following methods:
(1)
Utilization of either green catalysts, biochar, or activated catalysts;
(2)
Application of enzyme catalysts produced from the oil cake of the feedstock;
(3)
Use of waste cooking oil as a feedstock for biodiesel synthesis;
(4)
Implementation of circular economy in biodiesel production.
The use of enzyme catalysts in biofuel synthesis is not suitable on a commercial scale due to its high costs. Hence, the application of bio-based enzymes obtained from biomass is an alternative for the transesterification process. These green catalysts are highly efficient, eco-friendly, and non-corrosive and reduce water usage in biodiesel production [249]. These catalysts are found in abundance and are low-cost materials that are easily biodegradable in the environment [250,251]. A few studies have utilized char from hardwood, peanut hulls, pine log residues, and wood chips for biodiesel synthesis. Biochar was subjected to sulfonation and obtained a yield of 92% biodiesel. The catalyst showed a larger surface area and higher porosity of the catalyst, which increased the performance of the catalyst [252,253]. This catalyst can be reused for biodiesel production. Higher biodiesel production of 87.57% was achieved using a sulfonated rice husk catalyst, compared to amberlyst-15, which yielded 45.17% [254]. Activated carbon from peanut hulls showed efficiency of 90% in biodiesel conversion, but these catalysts lost their catalytic activity after the fourth cycle [253]. The utilization of sulfonated corn straw activated carbon was shown to achieve a 98% FAME yield [255]. Usually, most of the non-edible feedstocks used in biodiesel production have higher free fatty acid content and thus require a larger amount of alcohol (esterification and transesterification), and they also need acid and alkali catalysts for synthesis. The application of green catalysts minimizes the impacts created by the usage of acid and alkali catalysts. It also minimizes the alcohol quantity required for the transesterification reaction. Thus, it can reduce the effect created by the use of alcohol and chemical catalysts in biodiesel synthesis.
Oil cakes are the most often used substrates among the agricultural wastes used to produce lipase. Oil cakes (oil meals) are leftovers from the extraction of oil from seeds. They have been described as ideal substrates for the synthesis of microbial enzymes because they still contain nutrients that can act as carbon and nitrogen sources [256]. One of the earliest reports of lipase production using oil cakes dates back to the 1950s. Their residual oil content is a lipase production inducer [257]. In addition, there have been reports of several agricultural leftovers used to produce lipase, including brans, oil cakes, and bagasse. Solid-state fermentation offers a practical substitute for the manufacturing of industrial enzymes at reduced prices, with the benefit of using agro-industrial leftovers as fermentation substrates, many of which are viewed as inexpensive because they represent processing waste products [258]. In developing nations, enormous amounts of agricultural waste are produced, and their disposal is a significant environmental concern. Utilizing these residues as a source of nutrients for enzyme manufacturing will also lower the overall production costs [258]. Wheat bran, soybean cake, rice husk, gingelly oil cake, olive oil cake, sugar cane bagasse, babassu oil cake, and shea nut cake were among the agro-industrial leftovers investigated [259]. Thus, utilizing the oil cake in lipase production may have a great impact on the biofuel industry and food industry because of the mass production of the lipase from various agricultural resources. This not only generates a valuable compound from waste material but also addresses the environmental management and safe disposal of oil cakes.
Waste cooking oil utilization in biodiesel production is beneficial to the environment because it recycles waste cooking oil and produces renewable energy with less pollution. It can substitute some petrochemical oil imports while simultaneously lowering the waste management costs. Biodiesel synthesis from waste cooking oil offers three benefits: economic, environmental, and waste management [254,260]. Because of its cheaper cost, WCO is more likely than other raw materials to play a role in future biodiesel production [261]. Recycling low-cost feedstocks into high-value products, on the other hand, is a critical pillar in the development of a sustainable circular economy, which is an emerging economic paradigm [262]. As a result, converting WCO to bioenergy and biofuel might simultaneously improve energy security, reduce waste and pollution, protect food safety, and promote a circular economy and sustainable development [263].
The application of a circular economy in the biodiesel production process will increase the likelihood of successful biofuel applications. The production of valuable compounds such as enzymes and biochar not only creates new products; it also creates new job opportunities. The cost of biodiesel can be reduced by the application of the circular economy. Thus, it could generate more positive impacts, such as reduced pollution, better resource management, energy synthesis, and new product synthesis, as shown in Figure 5. The circular economy (CE), with a special emphasis on sustainable waste management strategies, aims to slow, narrow, and shut down supply chain loops by converting materials and waste back into resources, so as to create a sustainable and zero-waste environment [264].

10. Conclusions

The current work emphasizes the need to process oil seeds to increase the yields of oil. We demonstrate that few studies have reported on the processing of seeds for oil extraction. Using resource- and energy-efficient techniques for oil extraction and biodiesel synthesis will help to make the process more economical. Further, research on defatted biomass after oil extraction is required for waste minimization and the generation of revenue. Glycerol synthesis from the biodiesel production process also needs to be studied for use in various applications; for example, it can be used as a carbon source for the production of valuable compounds. We also recommend that future studies perform a complete LCA, incorporating both agricultural and industrial processes, which will give a clear picture of the sustainability of biofuel utilization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A. and K.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A. and K.M.S.; writing—review and editing, P.K., K.T., V.S. and L.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the scientific community for inspiring us with their works on biodiesel production from non-edible seeds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Silitonga, A.S.; Ong, H.C.; Masjuki, H.H.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Chong, W.T.; Yusaf, T.F. Production of Biodiesel from Sterculia foetida and Its Process Optimization. Fuel 2013, 111, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, F.; Hanna, M.A. Biodiesel Production: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 70, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Foidl, N. Jatropha curcas L. as a source for the production of biofuel in Nicaragua. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 58, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zullaikah, S.; Lai, C.-C.; Vali, S.R.; Ju, Y.-H. A Two-Step Acid-Catalyzed Process for the Production of Biodiesel from Rice Bran Oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1889–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, S.P.; Singh, D. Biodiesel Production through the Use of Different Sources and Characterization of Oils and Their Esters as the Substitute of Diesel: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Atabani, A.E.; Silitonga, A.S.; Ong, H.C.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Masjuki, H.H.; Badruddin, I.A.; Fayaz, H. Non-Edible Vegetable Oils: A Critical Evaluation of Oil Extraction, Fatty Acid Compositions, Biodiesel Production, Characteristics, Engine Performance and Emissions Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 18, 211–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. No, S. Inedible Vegetable Oils and Their Derivatives for Alternative Diesel Fuels in CI Engines: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, G.; Chen, F.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, G. Biodiesel Production by Microalgal Biotechnology. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Atabani, A.E.; Silitonga, A.S.; Anjum, I.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Masjuki, H.H.; Mekhilef, S. A Comprehensive Review on Biodiesel as an Alternative Energy Resource and Its Characteristics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2070–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silitonga, A.S.; Atabani, A.E.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Masjuki, H.H.; Anjum, I.; Mekhilef, S. A Review on Prospect of Jatropha curcas for Biodiesel in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3733–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. US Environmental Protection Agency. Biofuels and the Environment: Second Triennial Report to Congress; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  12. Ong, H.C.; Silitonga, A.S.; Masjuki, H.H.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Chong, W.T.; Boosroh, M.H. Production and Comparative Fuel Properties of Biodiesel from Non-Edible Oils: Jatropha curcas, Sterculia foetida and Ceiba pentandra. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 73, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, L.M.; Hanna, M.A. Expression of Oil from Oilseeds—A Review. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1983, 28, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, K.K.; Wiesenborn, D.P.; Tostenson, K.; Kangas, N. Influence of Moisture Content and Cooking on Screw Pressing of Crambe Seed. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2002, 79, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fadhlullah, M.; Widiyanto, S.N.B.; Restiawaty, E. The Potential of Nyamplung (Calophyllum inophyllum L.) Seed Oil as Biodiesel Feedstock: Effect of Seed Moisture Content and Particle Size on Oil Yield. Energy Procedia 2015, 68, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jahirul, M.I.; Brown, R.J.; Senadeera, W.; Ashwath, N.; Rasul, M.G.; Rahman, M.M.; Hossain, F.M.; Moghaddam, L.; Islam, M.A.; O’Hara, I.M. Physio-Chemical Assessment of Beauty Leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum) as Second-Generation Biodiesel Feedstock. Energy Rep. 2015, 1, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khalaf, M.; Abdel-Fadeel, W.; Hashish, H.M.; Wapet, D.E.M.; Mahmoud, M.M.; Elhady, S.A.; Esmail, M.F.C. Experimental Investigation of Different Extraction Methods for Producing Biofuel from Jatropha Seeds and Castor Seeds. Int. J. Energy Res. 2023, 2023, 1780536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jahirul, M.I.; Brown, J.R.; Senadeera, W.; Ashwath, N.; Laing, C.; Leski-Taylor, J.; Rasul, M.G. Optimisation of Bio-Oil Extraction Process from Beauty Leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum) Oil Seed as a Second Generation Biodiesel Source. Procedia Eng. 2013, 56, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kostić, M.D.; Joković, N.M.; Stamenković, O.S.; Rajković, K.M.; Milić, P.S.; Veljković, V.B. Optimization of Hempseed Oil Extraction by N-Hexane. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 48, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bhuiya, M.M.K.; Rasul, M.; Khan, M.; Ashwath, N.; Mofijur, M. Comparison of Oil Extraction between Screw Press and Solvent (n-Hexane) Extraction Technique from Beauty Leaf (Calophyllum inophyllum L.) Feedstock. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 144, 112024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chapuis, A.; Blin, J.; Carré, P.; Lecomte, D. Separation Efficiency and Energy Consumption of Oil Expression Using a Screw-Press: The Case of Jatropha curcas L. Seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, Y.; Wiesenborn, D.P.; Tostenson, K.; Kangas, N. Screw Pressing of Whole and Dehulled Flaxseed for Organic Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2003, 80, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Savoire, R. Screw Pressing Application to Oilseeds. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Willems, P.; Kuipers, N.J.M.; de Haan, A.B. Hydraulic Pressing of Oilseeds: Experimental Determination and Modeling of Yield and Pressing Rates. J. Food Eng. 2008, 89, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rombaut, N.; Savoire, R.; Thomasset, B.; Castello, J.; Van Hecke, E.; Lanoisellé, J.-L. Optimization of Oil Yield and Oil Total Phenolic Content during Grape Seed Cold Screw Pressing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 63, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saraf, S.; Thomas, B. Influence of Feedstock and Process Chemistry on Biodiesel Quality. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2007, 85, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sharma, Y.C.; Singh, B. Development of Biodiesel: Current Scenario. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1646–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Canakci, M. The Potential of Restaurant Waste Lipids as Biodiesel Feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muthukumaran, C.; Praniesh, R.; Navamani, P.; Swathi, R.; Sharmila, G.; Kumar, N.M. Process Optimization and Kinetic Modeling of Biodiesel Production Using Non-Edible Madhuca indica Oil. Fuel 2017, 195, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ng, J.-H.; Ng, H.K.; Gan, S. Recent Trends in Policies, Socioeconomy and Future Directions of the Biodiesel Industry. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2010, 12, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Atadashi, I.M.; Aroua, M.K.; Aziz, A.A. High Quality Biodiesel and Its Diesel Engine Application: A Review. Renew. Sustain. energy Rev. 2010, 14, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Souza, S.P.; Pacca, S.; de Ávila, M.T.; Borges, J.L.B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Balance of Palm Oil Biofuel. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 2552–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ali, M.; Ghobadian, B.; Safa, M. Energy Life-Cycle Assessment and CO2 Emissions Analysis of Soybean- Based Biodiesel: A Case Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sheehan, J.; Camobreco, V.; Duffield, J.; Graboski, M.; Shapouri, H. Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus; Final Report; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 1998.
  35. Piastrellini, R.; Arena, A.P.; Civit, B. Energy Life-Cycle Analysis of Soybean Biodiesel: Effects of Tillage and Water Management. Energy 2017, 126, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sajid, Z.; Khan, F.; Zhang, Y. Process Simulation and Life Cycle Analysis of Biodiesel Production. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Neag, E.; Stupar, Z.; Maicaneanu, S.A.; Roman, C. Advances in Biodiesel Production from Microalgae. Energies 2023, 16, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maroušek, J.; Maroušková, A.; Gavurová, B.; Tuček, D.; Strunecký, O. Competitive Algae Biodiesel Depends on Advances in Mass Algae Cultivation. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 374, 128802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wahidin, S.; Idris, A.; Yusof, N.M.; Kamis, N.H.H.; Shaleh, S.R.M. Optimization of the Ionic Liquid-Microwave Assisted One-Step Biodiesel Production Process from Wet Microalgal Biomass. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roy, M.; Mohanty, K. Valorization of De-Oiled Microalgal Biomass as a Carbon-Based Heterogeneous Catalyst for a Sustainable Biodiesel Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Openshaw, K. A Review of Jatropha Curcas: An Oil Plant of Unfulfilled Promise. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Balat, M. Potential Alternatives to Edible Oils for Biodiesel Production—A Review of Current Work. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011, 52, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Achten, W.M.J.; Verchot, L.; Franken, Y.J.; Mathijs, E.; Singh, V.P.; Aerts, R.; Muys, B. Jatropha Bio-Diesel Production and Use. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 1063–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ãzam, M.M.; Waris, A.; Nahar, N.M. Prospects and Potential of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters of Some Non-Traditional Seed Oils for Use as Biodiesel in India. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 29, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scott, P.T.; Pregelj, L.; Chen, N.; Hadler, J.S.; Djordjevic, M.A.; Gresshoff, P.M. Pongamia pinnata: An Untapped Resource for the Biofuels Industry of the Future. Bioenergy Res. 2008, 1, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karmee, S.K.; Chadha, A. Preparation of Biodiesel from Crude Oil of Pongamia pinnata. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1425–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gui, M.M.; Lee, K.T.; Bhatia, S. Feasibility of Edible Oil vs. Non-Edible Oil vs. Waste Edible Oil as Biodiesel Feedstock. Energy 2008, 33, 1646–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, A.; Sharma, S. Potential Non-Edible Oil Resources as Biodiesel Feedstock: An Indian Perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1791–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanford, S.D.; White, J.M.; Shah, P.S.; Wee, C.; Valverde, M.A.; Meier, G.R. Feedstock and Biodiesel Characteristics Report; Renewable Energy Group: Ames, IA, USA, 2009; Volume 416, pp. 1–136. [Google Scholar]
  50. Venkanna, B.K.; Reddy, C.V. Biodiesel Production and Optimization from Calophyllum inophyllum Linn Oil (Honne Oil)—A Three Stage Method. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5122–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pinzi, S.; Garcia, I.L.; Lopez-Gimenez, F.J.; Luque de Castro, M.D.; Dorado, G.; Dorado, M.P. The Ideal Vegetable Oil-Based Biodiesel Composition: A Review of Social, Economical and Technical Implications. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 2325–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Atabani, A.E.; César, S. Calophyllum inophyllum L.—A Prospective Non-Edible Biodiesel Feedstock. Study of Biodiesel Production, Properties, Fatty Acid Composition, Blending and Engine Performance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 37, 644–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fattah, I.M.R.; Kalam, M.A.; Masjuki, H.H.; Wakil, M.A. Biodiesel Production, Characterization, Engine Performance, and Emission Characteristics of Malaysian Alexandrian Laurel Oil. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 17787–17796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Balat, M.; Balat, H. Progress in Biodiesel Processing. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 1815–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jena, P.C.; Raheman, H.; Kumar, G.V.P.; Machavaram, R. Biodiesel Production from Mixture of Mahua and Simarouba Oils with High Free Fatty Acids. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 1108–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghadge, S.V.; Raheman, H. Biodiesel Production from Mahua (Madhuca indica) Oil Having High Free Fatty Acids. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Acharya, N.; Nanda, P.; Panda, S.; Acharya, S. Analysis of properties and estimation of optimum blending ratio of blended mahua biodiesel. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2017, 20, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, Y.; Xin, H.; Yan, Y. Physicochemical Properties of Stillingia Oil: Feasibility for Biodiesel Production by Enzyme Transesterification. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 30, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, R.; Hanna, M.A.; Zhou, W.-W.; Bhadury, P.S.; Chen, Q.; Song, B.-A.; Yang, S. Production and Selected Fuel Properties of Biodiesel from Promising Non-Edible Oils: Euphorbia lathyris L., Sapium sebiferum L. and Jatropha curcas L. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Murillo, G.; He, Y.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J.; Bartocci, P.; Ali, S.S.; Fantozzi, F. Ultrasonics—Sonochemistry Scaled-up Biodiesel Synthesis from Chinese Tallow Kernel Oil Catalyzed by Burkholderia Cepacia Lipase through Ultrasonic Assisted Technology: A Non-Edible and Alternative Source of Bio Energy. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 58, 104658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ragit, S.S.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Kundu, K.; Gill, P. Optimization of Neem Methyl Ester from Transesterification Process and Fuel Characterization as a Diesel Substitute. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 1138–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karmakar, A.; Karmakar, S.; Mukherjee, S. Biodiesel Production from Neem towards Feedstock Diversification: Indian Perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Okieimen, F.E.; Bakare, O.I.; Okieimen, C.O. Studies on the Epoxidation of Rubber Seed Oil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2002, 15, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmad, J.; Yusup, S.; Bokhari, A.; Kamil, R.N.M. Study of Fuel Properties of Rubber Seed Oil Based Biodiesel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 78, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Misra, R.D.; Murthy, M.S. Performance, Emission and Combustion Evaluation of Soapnut Oil–Diesel Blends in a Compression Ignition Engine. Fuel 2011, 90, 2514–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chhetri, A.B.; Tango, M.S.; Budge, S.M.; Watts, K.C.; Islam, M.R. Non-Edible Plant Oils as New Sources for Biodiesel Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chakraborty, M.; Baruah, D.C. Production and Characterization of Biodiesel Obtained from Sapindus mukorossi Kernel Oil. Energy 2013, 60, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Yu, H.; Yu, D.; Li, G.; Wang, L. Oil Content, Fatty Acid Composition and Biodiesel Properties among Natural Provenances of Siberian Apricot (Prunus sibirica L.) from China. Gcb Bioenergy 2021, 13, 112–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Zhao, G.; Binkoski, A.E.; Coval, S.M.; Etherton, T.D. The Effects of Nuts on Coronary Heart Disease Risk. Nutr. Rev. 2001, 59, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, J.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, H. Determination of Ability of Several Arbor and Shrub Species to Endure and Survive Extreme Aridity with Limited-Areas Methods under Field Conditions in Horqin Sandy Land. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2006, 26, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kale, S.S.; Darade, V.; Thakur, H.A. Analysis of Fixed Oil from Sterculia foetida Linn. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2011, 2, 2908. [Google Scholar]
  72. Silitonga, A.S.; Masjuki, H.H.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Ong, H.C.; Chong, W.T.; Boosroh, M.H. Overview Properties of Biodiesel Diesel Blends from Edible and Non-Edible Feedstock. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Devan, P.K.; Mahalakshmi, N. V Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics of Poon Oil and Its Diesel Blends in a DI Diesel Engine. Fuel 2009, 88, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Atabani, A.E.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Anjum Badruddin, I.; Masjuki, H.H.; Chong, W.T.; Lee, K.T. Investigation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Potential Edible and Non-Edible Feedstocks for Biodiesel Production, a Comparative Analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vipunngeun, N.; Palanuvej, C. Fatty Acids of Sterculia foetida Seed Oil. J. Health Res. 2009, 23, 157. [Google Scholar]
  76. Salunkhe, D.K.; Kadam, S. Handbook of Fruit Science and Technology: Production, Composition, Storage, and Processing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; ISBN 1482273454. [Google Scholar]
  77. Anwar, M.; Rasul, M.; Ashwath, N. Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Stone Fruit Kernel Oil. Energy Procedia 2019, 160, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yadav, A.K.; Pal, A.; Dubey, A.M. Experimental Studies on Utilization of Prunus armeniaca L. (Wild Apricot) Biodiesel as an Alternative Fuel for CI Engine. Waste Biomass Valor. 2018, 9, 1961–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kate, A.E.; Lohani, U.C.; Pandey, J.P.; Shahi, N.C.; Sarkar, A. Traditional and Mechanical Method of the Oil Extraction from Wild Apricot Kernel: A Comparative Study. Res. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  80. Sharma, R.; Gupta, A.; Abrol, G.S.; Joshi, V.K. Value Addition of Wild Apricot Fruits Grown in North–West Himalayan Regions-a Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2917–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Yu-Shan, W.; Zhi-Shu, X.; Zhi-Bin, Z. Seed Deposition Patterns of Oil Tea Camellia Oleifera Influenced by Seed-Caching Rodents. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2004, 46, 773. [Google Scholar]
  82. Demirbas, A.; Kinsara, R.A. Cost Analysis of Biodiesel from Kernel Oil of Tea Seed. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2017, 12, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singh, R. Energy Sufficiency Aspirations of India and the Role of Renewable Resources: Scenarios for Future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2783–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Karmakar, B.; Halder, G. Progress and Future of Biodiesel Synthesis: Advancements in Oil Extraction and Conversion Technologies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 182, 307–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahmad, F.B.; Zhang, Z.; Doherty, W.O.S.; O’Hara, I.M. The Outlook of the Production of Advanced Fuels and Chemicals from Integrated Oil Palm Biomass Biorefinery. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 109, 386–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lam, M.K.; Tan, K.T.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Malaysian Palm Oil: Surviving the Food versus Fuel Dispute for a Sustainable Future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mohammed, M.A.A.; Salmiaton, A.; Azlina, W.W.; Amran, M.S.M.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Hydrogen Rich Gas from Oil Palm Biomass as a Potential Source of Renewable Energy in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Murata, Y.; Tanaka, R.; Fujimoto, K.; Kosugi, A.; Arai, T.; Togawa, E.; Takano, T.; Ibrahim, W.A.; Elham, P.; Sulaiman, O. Development of Sap Compressing Systems from Oil Palm Trunk. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 51, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ong, H.C.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Masjuki, H.H.; Norhasyima, R.S. Comparison of Palm Oil, Jatropha curcas and Calophyllum inophyllum for Biodiesel: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3501–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sumathi, S.; Chai, S.P.; Mohamed, A.R. Utilization of Oil Palm as a Source of Renewable Energy in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 2404–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deka, D.C.; Basumatary, S. High Quality Biodiesel from Yellow Oleander (Thevetia peruviana) Seed Oil. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yadav, A.K.; Khan, M.E.; Pal, A.; Dubey, A.M. Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics of an Indica Diesel Engine Operated with Yellow Oleander (Thevetia peruviana) Oil Biodiesel Produced through Hydrodynamic Cavitation Method. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2018, 39, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chhetri, A.B.; Watts, K.C.; Rahman, M.S.; Islam, M.R. Soapnut Extract as a Natural Surfactant for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2009, 31, 1893–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alamu, O.J. Effect of Ethanol—Palm Kernel Oil Ratio on Alkali-Catalyzed Biodiesel Yield. Fuel 2008, 87, 1529–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kavitha, M.S.; Murugavelh, S. Optimization and Transesteri Fi Cation of Sterculia Oil: Assessment of Engine Performance, Emission and Combustion Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 1192–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Canoira, L.; Alcantara, R.; García-Martínez, M.J.; Carrasco, J. Biodiesel from Jojoba Oil-Wax: Transesterification with Methanol and Properties as a Fuel. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wood, J.A.; Malcolmson, L.; Tiwari, B.; Gowen, A.; Mckenna, B. Pulse Foods: Processing, Quality and Nutraceutical Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  98. Shukla, B.D.; Srivastava, P.K.; Gupta, R.K. Oilseeds Processing Technology; Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering: Nabi Bagh, India, 1992.
  99. Carré, P.; Citeau, M.; Robin, G.; Estorges, M. Hull Content and Chemical Composition of Whole Seeds, Hulls and Germs in Cultivars of Rapeseed (Brassica napus). OCL 2016, 23, A302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kumar, A.; Sharma, S. An Evaluation of Multipurpose Oil Seed Crop for Industrial Uses (Jatropha curcas L.): A Review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhu, G.; Liu, H.; Xie, Y.; Liao, Q.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, H.; Gao, Z.; Hu, S. Postharvest Processing and Storage Methods for Camellia Oleifera Seeds. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 36, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Martinez-Soberanes, E.E.; Mustafa, R.; Reaney, M.J.T.; Zhang, W.J. Seed Hull Utilization. In Food Wastes and By-Products: Nutraceutical and Health Potential; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 291–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Oomah, B.D.; Ward, S.; Balasubramanian, P. Dehulling and Selected Physical Characteristics of Canadian Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ikebudu, J.A.; Sokhansanj, S.; Tyler, R.T.; Milne, B.J.; Thakor, N.S. Grain Conditioning for Dehulling of Canola. Can. Agric. Eng. 2000, 42, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ashwath, N. Evaluating Biodiesel Potential of Australian Native and Naturalised Plant Species; CQUniversity: Sydney, Australia, 2010; ISBN 174254181X. [Google Scholar]
  106. Cao, L.; Zhang, S. Production and Characterization of Biodiesel Derived from Hodgsonia Macrocarpa Seed Oil. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Indrasari, S.D.; Koswara, S.; Muchtadi, D.; Nagara, L.M. The Effect of Heating on the Physicochemical Characteristics of Rice Bran Oil. Indones. J. Agric. Sci. 2001, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pradhan, R.C.; Mishra, S.; Naik, S.N.; Bhatnagar, N.; Vijay, V.K. Oil Expression from Jatropha Seeds Using a Screw Press Expeller. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 109, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jaswant, S.; Bargale, P.C. Mechanical Expression of Oil from Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). J. Oilseeds Res. 1990, 7, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
  110. Lim, S.; Lee, K.T. Process Intensification for Biodiesel Production from Jatropha curcas L. Seeds: Supercritical Reactive Extraction Process Parameters Study. Appl. Energy 2013, 103, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Franco, D.; Sineiro, J.; Núñez, M.J. Analysis of Variables and Modeling of Gevuina Avellana Oil Extraction with Ethanol near Azeotrope Conditions. J. Food Process Eng. 2009, 32, 664–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Karlovic, D.; Sovilj, M.; Turkulov, J. Kinetics of Oil Extraction from Corn Germ. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1992, 69, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nagy, B.; Simándi, B. Effects of Particle Size Distribution, Moisture Content, and Initial Oil Content on the Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Paprika. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2008, 46, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Contran, N.; Chessa, L.; Lubino, M.; Bellavite, D.; Paolo, P.; Enne, G. State-of-the-Art of the Jatropha curcas Productive Chain: From Sowing to Biodiesel and by-Products. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 42, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Koh, M.Y.; Idaty, T.; Ghazi, M. A Review of Biodiesel Production from Jatropha curcas L. Oil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2240–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Leung, D.Y.C.; Wu, X.; Leung, M.K.H. A Review on Biodiesel Production Using Catalyzed Transesterification. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wilson, P. Biodiesel Production from Jatropha curcas: A Review. Sci. Res. Essays 2010, 5, 1796–1808. [Google Scholar]
  118. Ye, M.; Li, C.; Francis, G.; Makkar, H.P.S. Current Situation and Prospects of Jatropha curcas as a Multipurpose Tree in China. Agrofor. Syst. 2009, 76, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Devappa, R.K.; Makkar, H.P.S.; Becker, K. Biodegradation of Jatropha curcas Phorbol Esters in Soil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 2090–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gunaseelan, V.N. Biomass Estimates, Characteristics, Biochemical Methane Potential, Kinetics and Energy Flow from Jatropha curcus on Dry Lands. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mahanta, N.; Gupta, A.; Khare, S.K. Production of Protease and Lipase by Solvent Tolerant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa PseA in Solid-State Fermentation Using Jatropha curcas Seed Cake as Substrate. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Makkar, H.P.S.; Francis, G.; Becker, K. Protein Concentrate from Jatropha curcas Screw-pressed Seed Cake and Toxic and Antinutritional Factors in Protein Concentrate. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Savoire, R.; Lanoisellé, J.-L.; Vorobiev, E. Mechanical Continuous Oil Expression from Oilseeds: A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Anderson, D. A Primer on Oils Processing Technology. In Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; Volume 5, pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  125. Prescha, A.; Grajzer, M.; Dedyk, M.; Grajeta, H. The Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stability of Cold-pressed Oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Azadmard-Damirchi, S.; Alirezalu, K.; Achachlouei, B.F. Microwave Pretreatment of Seeds to Extract High Quality Vegetable Oil. World Acad Sci. Eng Technol 2011, 57, 72–75. [Google Scholar]
  127. Bhuiya, M.M.K.; Rasul, M.G.; Khan, M.M.K.; Ashwath, N.; Azad, A.K. Prospects of 2nd Generation Biodiesel as a Sustainable Fuel—Part: 1 Selection of Feedstocks, Oil Extraction Techniques and Conversion Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1109–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sambasivam, K.M.; Murugavelh, S. Optimisation, Experimental Validation and Thermodynamic Study of the Sequential Oil Extraction and Biodiesel Production Processes from Seeds of Sterculia foetida. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 31301–31314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Kou, D.; Mitra, S. Extraction of Semivolatile Organic Compounds from Solid Matrices. In Sample Preparation Techniques in Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; Volume 162, pp. 139–182. [Google Scholar]
  130. Sivakumar, P.; Parthiban, K.S.; Sivakumar, P.; Vinoba, M.; Renganathan, S. Optimization of Extraction Process and Kinetics of Sterculia foetida Seed Oil and Its Process Augmentation for Biodiesel Production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 8992–8998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mahanta, P.; Shrivastava, A. Technology Development of Bio-Diesel as an Energy Alternative; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology: Guwahati, India, 2004; pp. 1–19. Available online: https://www.newagepublishers.com/samplechapter/001305.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2023).
  132. Chemat, F.; Cravotto, G. Microwave-Assisted Extraction for Bioactive Compounds: Theory and Practice; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 4, ISBN 1461448301. [Google Scholar]
  133. Chemat, F.; Khan, M.K. Applications of Ultrasound in Food Technology: Processing, Preservation and Extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 813–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Roselló-Soto, E.; Koubaa, M.; Moubarik, A.; Lopes, R.P.; Saraiva, J.A.; Boussetta, N.; Grimi, N.; Barba, F.J. Emerging Opportunities for the Effective Valorization of Wastes and By-Products Generated during Olive Oil Production Process: Non-Conventional Methods for the Recovery of High-Added Value Compounds. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Luque-Garcıa, J.L.; de Castro, M.D.L. Ultrasound-Assisted Soxhlet Extraction: An Expeditive Approach for Solid Sample Treatment: Application to the Extraction of Total Fat from Oleaginous Seeds. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1034, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Koubaa, M.; Mhemdi, H.; Barba, F.J.; Roohinejad, S.; Greiner, R.; Vorobiev, E. Oilseed Treatment by Ultrasounds and Microwaves to Improve Oil Yield and Quality: An Overview. Food Res. Int. 2016, 85, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wei, F.; Gao, G.-Z.; Wang, X.-F.; Dong, X.-Y.; Li, P.-P.; Hua, W.; Wang, X.; Wu, X.-M.; Chen, H. Quantitative Determination of Oil Content in Small Quantity of Oilseed Rape by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Combined with Gas Chromatography. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Farahani, G.T.; Azari, P.Y. Improving the Oil Yield of Iranian Jatropha curcas Seeds by Optimising Ultrasound-Assisted Ethanolic Extraction Process: A Response Surface Method. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2016, 8, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Koubaa, M.; Rosello-Soto, E.; Žlabur, J.; Rezek Jambrak, A.; Brncic, M.; Grimi, N.; Boussetta, N.; Barba, F.J. Current and New Insights in the Sustainable and Green Recovery of Nutritionally Valuable Compounds from Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 6835–6846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Roselló-Soto, E.; Parniakov, O.; Deng, Q.; Patras, A.; Koubaa, M.; Grimi, N.; Boussetta, N.; Tiwari, B.K.; Vorobiev, E.; Lebovka, N. Application of Non-Conventional Extraction Methods: Toward a Sustainable and Green Production of Valuable Compounds from Mushrooms. Food Eng. Rev. 2016, 8, 214–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ideris, F.; Nomanbhay, S.; Kusumo, F.; Silitonga, A.S.; Ong, M.Y.; Ong, H.C.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Oil Extraction from Canarium odontophyllum Kernel as a Novel Biodiesel Feedstock. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Golmakani, M.-T.; Rezaei, K. Comparison of Microwave-Assisted Hydrodistillation Withthe Traditional Hydrodistillation Method in the Extractionof Essential Oils from Thymus vulgaris L. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hao, J.; Han, W.; Xue, B.; Deng, X. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Artemisinin from Artemisia annua L. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 28, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Letellier, M.; Budzinski, H.; Charrier, L.; Capes, S.; Dorthe, A.M. Optimization by Factorial Design of Focused Microwave Assisted Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Marine Sediment. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 364, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Pawelzik, E.; Irfan, I.; Luecke, W. Microwave Treatment of Rape to Ensure Seed Quality during Storage. In Proceedings of the 7th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, Beijing, China, 14–19 October 1998; Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology: Chengdu, China, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 1671–1675. [Google Scholar]
  146. Azadmard-Damirchi, S.; Habibi-Nodeh, F.; Hesari, J.; Nemati, M.; Achachlouei, B.F. Effect of Pretreatment with Microwaves on Oxidative Stability and Nutraceuticals Content of Oil from Rapeseed. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 1211–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rosenthal, A.; Pyle, D.L.; Niranjan, K.; Gilmour, S.; Trinca, L. Combined Effect of Operational Variables and Enzyme Activity on Aqueous Enzymatic Extraction of Oil and Protein from Soybean. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2001, 28, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Shah, S.; Sharma, A.; Gupta, M.N. Extraction of Oil from Jatropha curcas L. Seed Kernels by Combination of Ultrasonication and Aqueous Enzymatic Oil Extraction. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Rosenthal, A.; Pyle, D.L.; Niranjan, K. Aqueous and Enzymatic Processes for Edible Oil Extraction. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 402–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rao, T.V.; Rao, G.P.; Reddy, K.H.C. Experimental Investigation of Pongamia, Jatropha and Neem Methyl Esters as Biodiesel on CI Engine. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2008, 2, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  151. Ramadhas, A.S.; Jayaraj, S.; Muraleedharan, C. Biodiesel Production from High FFA Rubber Seed Oil. Fuel 2005, 84, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lamsal, B.P.; Johnson, L.A. Separating Oil from Aqueous Extraction Fractions of Soybean. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2007, 84, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Liu, Z.; Gui, M.; Xu, T.; Zhang, L.; Kong, L.; Qin, L.; Zou, Z. Industrial Crops & Products Efficient Aqueous Enzymatic-Ultrasonication Extraction of Oil from Sapindus mukorossi Seed Kernels. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Singh, B.; Kumar, N.; Muk, H.; Chang, H. A Study on the Performance and Emission of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Karanja Biodiesel and Its Blends. Energy 2013, 56, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sanli, M.C.H. Biodiesel Production from Various Feedstocks and Their e V Ects on the Fuel Properties. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sahoo, P.K.; Das, L.M. Process Optimization for Biodiesel Production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga Oils. Fuel 2009, 88, 1588–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Olisakwe, H.C.; Tuleun, L.T.; Eloka-Eboka, A.C. Comparative Study of Thevetia peruviana and Jatropha curcas Seed Oils as Feedstock for Grease Production. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2011, 1, 793–806. [Google Scholar]
  158. Saravanan, N.; Nagarajan, G.; Puhan, S. Experimental Investigation on a DI Diesel Engine Fuelled with Madhuca indica Ester and Diesel Blend. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, L.; Yu, H. Biodiesel from Siberian Apricot (Prunus sibirica L.) Seed Kernel Oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Devan, P.K.; Mahalakshmi, N. V Study of the Performance, Emission and Combustion Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Using Poon Oil-Based Fuels. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fukuda, H.; Kond, A.; Noda, H. Biodiesel Fuel Production by Transesterification. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001, 92, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jain, S.; Sharma, M.P. Prospects of Biodiesel from Jatropha in India: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Demirbas, A. Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oils via Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Supercritical Methanol Transesterification Methods. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 466–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhao, C.; Ding, Y.; Xu, P. Bioresource Technology Biodiesel Production in Packed-Bed Reactors Using Lipase—Nanoparticle Biocomposite. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 6352–6355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Barnwal, B.K.; Sharma, M.P. Prospects of Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oils in India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2005, 9, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gandhi, B.S.; Chelladurai, S.S.; Kumaran, D.S. Process Optimization for Biodiesel Synthesis from Jatropha curcas Oil. Distrib. Gener. Altern. Energy J. 2011, 26, 6–16. [Google Scholar]
  167. Ghadge, S.V.; Raheman, H. Process Optimization for Biodiesel Production from Mahua (Madhuca indica) Oil Using Response Surface Methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Sharon, H.; Karuppasamy, K.; Kumar, D.R.S.; Sundaresan, A. A Test on DI Diesel Engine Fueled with Methyl Esters of Used Palm Oil. Renew. Energy 2012, 47, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Gurunathan, B.; Ravi, A. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using Copper Doped Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite as Heterogeneous Catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 188, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Serin, H.; Ozcanli, M.; Kemal Gokce, M.; Tuccar, G. Biodiesel Production from Tea Seed (Camellia sinensis) Oil and Its Blends with Diesel Fuel. Int. J. Green Energy 2013, 10, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Sharma, Y.C.; Singh, B. A Hybrid Feedstock for a Very Efficient Preparation of Biodiesel. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Alamu, O.J.; Akintola, T.A.; Enweremadu, C.C.; Adeleke, A.E. Characterization of Palm-Kernel Oil Biodiesel Produced through NaOH-Catalysed Transesterification Process. Sci. Res. Essay 2008, 3, 308–311. [Google Scholar]
  173. Schuchardt, U.; Sercheli, R.; Vargas, R.M. Transesterification of Vegetable Oils: A Review. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1998, 9, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Demirbas, A. Comparison of Transesterification Methods for Production of Biodiesel from Vegetable Oils and Fats. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008, 49, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Frascari, D.; Zuccaro, M.; Pinelli, D.; Paglianti, A. A Pilot-Scale Study of Alkali-Catalyzed Sunflower Oil Transesterification with Static Mixing and with Mechanical Agitation. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Noureddini, H.; Gao, X.; Philkana, R.S. Immobilized Pseudomonas Cepacia Lipase for Biodiesel Fuel Production from Soybean Oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Cetinkaya, M.; Karaosmanoǧlu, F. Optimization of Base-Catalyzed Transesterification Reaction of Used Cooking Oil. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1888–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Aransiola, E.F.; Ojumu, T.V.; Oyekola, O.O.; Madzimbamuto, T.F. ScienceDirect A Review of Current Technology for Biodiesel Production: State of the Art. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 61, 276–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Maçaira, J.; Santana, A.; Recasens, F.; Larrayoz, M.A. Biodiesel Production Using Supercritical Methanol/Carbon Dioxide Mixtures in a Continuous Reactor. Fuel 2011, 90, 2280–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kiss, A.A. Novel Process for Biodiesel by Reactive Absorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 69, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Atadashi, I.M.; Aroua, M.K.; Aziz, A.R.A.; Sulaiman, N.M.N. Production of Biodiesel Using High Free Fatty Acid Feedstocks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 3275–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Aransiola, E.F.; Betiku, E.; Ikhuomoregbe, D.I.O.; Ojumu, T.V. Production of Biodiesel from Crude Neem Oil Feedstock and Its Emissions from Internal Combustion Engines. African J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 6178–6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Aranda, D.A.G.; Santos, R.T.P.; Tapanes, N.C.O.; Ramos, A.L.D.; Antunes, O.A.C. Acid-Catalyzed Homogeneous Esterification Reaction for Biodiesel Production from Palm Fatty Acids. Catal. Letters 2008, 122, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zhang, J.; Jiang, L. Acid-Catalyzed Esterification of Zanthoxylum Bungeanum Seed Oil with High Free Fatty Acids for Biodiesel Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 8995–8998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Berchmans, H.J.; Hirata, S. Biodiesel Production from Crude Jatropha curcas L. Seed Oil with a High Content of Free Fatty Acids. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1716–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Deng, X.; Fang, Z.; Liu, Y. Ultrasonic Transesterification of Jatropha curcas L. Oil to Biodiesel by a Two-Step Process. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 2802–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Wang, Y.; Ou, S.; Liu, P.; Xue, F.; Tang, S. Comparison of Two Different Processes to Synthesize Biodiesel by Waste Cooking Oil. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 252, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Çaylı, G.; Küsefoğlu, S. Increased Yields in Biodiesel Production from Used Cooking Oils by a Two Step Process: Comparison with One Step Process by Using TGA. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Endalew, A.K.; Kiros, Y.; Zanzi, R. Heterogeneous Catalysis for Biodiesel Production from Jatropha curcas Oil (JCO). Energy 2011, 36, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Yan, S.; DiMaggio, C.; Mohan, S.; Kim, M.; Salley, S.O.; Ng, K.Y. Advancements in Heterogeneous Catalysis for Biodiesel Synthesis. Top. Catal. 2010, 53, 721–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Helwani, Z.; Othman, M.R.; Aziz, N.; Fernando, W.J.N.; Kim, J. Technologies for Production of Biodiesel Focusing on Green Catalytic Techniques: A Review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 1502–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Zhang, S.; Zu, Y.-G.; Fu, Y.-J.; Luo, M.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Efferth, T. Rapid Microwave-Assisted Transesterification of Yellow Horn Oil to Biodiesel Using a Heteropolyacid Solid Catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Yang, R.; Yan, Y. Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oil Using Heterogenous Acid and Alkali Catalyst. Fuel 2010, 89, 2939–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Arumugam, A. Production of Biodiesel from Non-Edible Sources: Technological Updates; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; ISBN 032385897X. [Google Scholar]
  195. Parangi, T.; Mishra, M.K. Solid Acid Catalysts for Biodiesel Production. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2020, 40, 176–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Dhawane, S.H.; Kumar, T.; Halder, G. Parametric Effects and Optimization on Synthesis of Iron (II) Doped Carbonaceous Catalyst for the Production of Biodiesel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 122, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Vasić, K.; Hojnik Podrepšek, G.; Knez, Ž.; Leitgeb, M. Biodiesel Production Using Solid Acid Catalysts Based on Metal Oxides. Catalysts 2020, 10, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Borah, M.J.; Devi, A.; Borah, R.; Deka, D. Synthesis and Application of Co Doped ZnO as Heterogeneous Nanocatalyst for Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Patil, A.; Baral, S.S.; Dhanke, P.; Kore, V. Biodiesel Production Using Prepared Novel Surface Functionalised TiO2 Nano-Catalyst in Hydrodynamic Cavitation Reactor. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Babajide, O.; Petrik, L.; Musyoka, N.; Amigun, B.; Ameer, F. Use of Coal Fly Ash as a Catalyst in the Production of Biodiesel. Pet. Coal 2010, 52, 261–272. [Google Scholar]
  201. Sharma, Y.C.; Singh, B.; Korstad, J. Application of an Efficient Nonconventional Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis from Pongamia pinnata Oil. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 3223–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Kotwal, M.S.; Niphadkar, P.S.; Deshpande, S.S.; Bokade, V.V.; Joshi, P.N. Transesterification of Sunflower Oil Catalyzed by Flyash-Based Solid Catalysts. Fuel 2009, 88, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ngamcharussrivichai, C.; Nunthasanti, P.; Tanachai, S.; Bunyakiat, K. Biodiesel Production through Transesterification over Natural Calciums. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gog, A.; Roman, M.; Toşa, M.; Paizs, C.; Irimie, F.D. Biodiesel Production Using Enzymatic Transesterification—Current State and Perspectives. Renew. Energy 2012, 39, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Antczak, M.S.; Kubiak, A.; Antczak, T.; Bielecki, S. Enzymatic Biodiesel Synthesis—Key Factors Affecting Efficiency of the Process. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Dizge, N.; Keskinler, B. Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel from Canola Oil Using Immobilized Lipase. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Shah, S.; Gupta, M.N. Lipase Catalyzed Preparation of Biodiesel from Jatropha Oil in a Solvent Free System. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Lee, M.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.; Cho, J.; Kim, S.; Park, C. Improvement of Enzymatic Biodiesel Production by Controlled Substrate Feeding Using Silica Gel in Solvent Free System. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 49, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Kaieda, M.; Samukawa, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Ban, K.; Kondo, A.; Shimada, Y.; Noda, H.; Nomoto, F.; Ohtsuka, K.; Izumoto, E. Biodiesel Fuel Production from Plant Oil Catalyzed by Rhizopus oryzae Lipase in a Water-Containing System without an Organic Solvent. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1999, 88, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Chen, J.-W.; Wu, W.-T. Regeneration of Immobilized Candida antarctica Lipase for Transesterification. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003, 95, 466–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Nelson, L.A.; Foglia, T.A.; Marmer, W.N. Lipase-Catalyzed Production of Biodiesel. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1996, 73, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Soumanou, M.M.; Bornscheuer, U.T. Improvement in Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters from Sunflower Oil. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2003, 33, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Meher, L.C.; Sagar, D.V.; Naik, S.N. Technical Aspects of Biodiesel Production by Transesterification—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2006, 10, 248–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Vázquez, V.Á.; Flores, M.M.A.; Casas, L.F.H.; Castillo, N.A.M.; Uribe, A.R.; Aguado, H.C.C. Biodiesel Production Catalyzed by Lipase Extract Powder of Leonotis nepetifolia (Christmas Candlestick) Seed. Energies 2023, 16, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Santos, F.F.P.; Rodrigues, S.; Fernandes, F.A.N. Optimization of the Production of Biodiesel from Soybean Oil by Ultrasound Assisted Methanolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Fan, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, F. Ultrasonically Assisted Production of Biodiesel from Crude Cottonseed Oil. Int. J. Green Energy 2010, 7, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Oliveira, P.A.; Baesso, R.M.; Morais, G.C.; Alvarenga, A.V.; Costa-Félix, R.P.B. Ultrasound-Assisted Transesterification of Soybean Oil Using Low Power and High Frequency and No External Heating Source. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 78, 105709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Sebayang, A.H.; Kusumo, F.; Milano, J.; Shamsuddin, A.H.; Silitonga, A.S.; Ideris, F.; Siswantoro, J.; Veza, I.; Mofijur, M.; Chia, S.R. Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Rice Bran Oil by Ultrasound and Infrared Radiation Using ANN-GWO. Fuel 2023, 346, 128404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Azcan, N.; Danisman, A. Alkali Catalyzed Transesterification of Cottonseed Oil by Microwave Irradiation. Fuel 2007, 86, 2639–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Groisman, Y.; Gedanken, A. Continuous Flow, Circulating Microwave System and Its Application in Nanoparticle Fabrication and Biodiesel Synthesis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 8802–8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Borugadda, V.B.; Goud, V. V Biodiesel Production from Renewable Feedstocks: Status and Opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4763–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Marra, F.; de Bonis, M.V.; Ruocco, G. Combined Microwaves and Convection Heating: A Conjugate Approach. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Vyas, A.P.; Verma, J.L.; Subrahmanyam, N. A Review on FAME Production Processes. Fuel 2010, 89, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Rokni, K.; Mostafaei, M.; Soufi, M.D.; Kahrizi, D. Microwave-Assisted Intensification of Transesterification Reaction for Biodiesel Production from Camelina Oil: Optimization by Box-Behnken Design. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 17, 100928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Kavitha, M. In Situ Acid Catalysed Transesterification of Biodiesel Production from Sterculia foetida Oil and Seed. Int. J. Green Energy 2019, 16, 1465–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Kildiran, G.; Yücel, S.Ö.; Türkay, S. In-situ Alcoholysis of Soybean Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1996, 73, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Georgogianni, K.G.; Kontominas, M.G.; Pomonis, P.J.; Avlonitis, D.; Gergis, V. Conventional and in Situ Transesterification of Sunflower Seed Oil for the Production of Biodiesel. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Shuit, S.H.; Lee, K.T.; Kamaruddin, A.H.; Yusup, S. Reactive Extraction and in Situ Esterification of Jatropha curcas L. Seeds for the Production of Biodiesel. Fuel 2010, 89, 527–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Choi, W.; Kim, G.; Lee, S.; Lee, H. Biodiesel Production from Scenedesmus sp. through Optimized in Situ Acidic Transesterification Process. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2014, 28, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Koberg, M.; Gedanken, A. Direct Transesterification of Castor and Jatropha Seeds for FAME Production by Microwave and Ultrasound Radiation Using a SrO Catalyst. BioEnergy Res. 2012, 5, 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Koutsouki, A.A.; Tegou, E.; Kontakos, S.; Kontominas, M.G.; Pomonis, P.J.; Manos, G. In Situ Transesterification of Cynara Cardunculus L. Seed Oil via Direct Ultrasonication for the Production of Biodiesel. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 134, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Kavitha, M.S.; Murugavelh, S. Biodiesel Production from Reactive Extraction of Sterculia and Waste Cooking Oil Blend Using an Acid Catalyst Biodiesel Production from Reactive Extraction of Sterculia and Waste Cooking Oil Blend Using an Acid. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2019, 42, 1435–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Tarigan, J.B.; Prakoso, H.T.; Siahaan, D.; Kaban, J. Rapid Biodiesel Production from Palm Kernel through in Situ Transesterification Reaction Using CaO as Catalyst. Int. J. Appl. Chem. 2017, 13, 631–646. [Google Scholar]
  234. Muhammad, A.B.; Obianke, M.; Gusau, L.H.; Aliero, A.A. Optimization of Process Variables in Acid Catalysed in Situ Transesterification of Hevea brasiliensis (Rubber Tree) Seed Oil into Biodiesel. Biofuels 2017, 8, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Belagur, V.K.; Chitimi, V.R. Few Physical, Chemical and Fuel Related Properties of Calophyllum inophyllum Linn (Honne) Oil and Its Blends with Diesel Fuel for Their Use in Diesel Engine. Fuel 2013, 109, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Demirbas, A. Progress and Recent Trends in Biodiesel Fuels. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 14–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Munarso, J. Plantation of Sterculia feotida L. as Vegetable Oil. Inf. Technol. Agric. Jakarta Indones. Agency Agric. Res. Dev. 2010, 1, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  238. Barabás, I.; Todoruţ, I.-A. Biodiesel Quality, Standards and Properties. In Biodiesel-Quality, Emissions and By-Products; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  239. Sureshkumar, K.; Velraj, R.; Ganesan, R. Performance and Exhaust Emission Characteristics of a CI Engine Fueled with Pongamia pinnata Methyl Ester (PPME) and Its Blends with Diesel. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 2294–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Demirbas, A. Tea Seed Upgrading Facilities and Economic Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Tea Seed Oil. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 2595–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Raj, F.R.M.S.; Sahayaraj, J.W. A Comparative Study over Alternative Fuel (Biodiesel) for Environmental Friendly Emission. In Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Space Technology Services and Climate Change 2010 (RSTS & CC-2010), Chennai, India, 13–15 November 2010; pp. 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  242. Fernando, S.; Karra, P.; Hernandez, R.; Jha, S.K. Effect of Incompletely Converted Soybean Oil on Biodiesel Quality. Energy 2007, 32, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Ramadhas, A.S.; Muraleedharan, C.; Jayaraj, S. Performance and Emission Evaluation of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Methyl Esters of Rubber Seed Oil. Renew. Energy 2005, 30, 1789–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Tiwari, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Raheman, H. Biodiesel Production from Jatropha Oil (Jatropha curcas) with High Free Fatty Acids: An Optimized Process. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Omorogbe, S.O.; Ikhuoria, E.U.; Aigbodion, A.I.; Obazee, E.O.; Momodu, V.M. Production of Rubber Seed Oil Based Biodiesel Using Different Catalysts. Curr. Res. Chem. 2013, 5, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Dufour, J.; Iribarren, D. Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Free Fatty Acid-Rich Wastes. Renew. Energy 2012, 38, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Liu, S.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Xi, B.; Chen, Z.; Chang, S.; Gao, S.; Zhao, G.; Weng, X.; Jia, L. Plantation Model of Soapberry (Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn.) in Southeast China in Relation to Environmental Impact Effect Based on a Life Cycle Assessment. BioEnergy Res. 2022, 15, 1342–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Wagner, M.; Lippe, M.; Lewandowski, I.; Salzer, M.; Cadisch, G. CO2 Footprint of the Seeds of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) as a Biodiesel Feedstock Source. Forests 2018, 9, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Lam, M.K.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Homogeneous, Heterogeneous and Enzymatic Catalysis for Transesterification of High Free Fatty Acid Oil (Waste Cooking Oil) to Biodiesel: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 500–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Luque, R.; Pineda, A.; Colmenares, J.C.; Campelo, J.M.; Romero, A.A.; Serrano-Riz, J.C.; Cabeza, L.F.; Cot-Gores, J. Carbonaceous Residues from Biomass Gasification as Catalysts for Biodiesel Production. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Sanjay, B. Heterogeneous Catalyst Derived from Natural Resources for Biodiesel Production: A Review. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 2013, 3, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  252. Dehkhoda, A.M.; West, A.H.; Ellis, N. Biochar Based Solid Acid Catalyst for Biodiesel Production. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 382, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Kastner, J.R.; Miller, J.; Geller, D.P.; Locklin, J.; Keith, L.H.; Johnson, T. Catalytic Esterification of Fatty Acids Using Solid Acid Catalysts Generated from Biochar and Activated Carbon. Catal. Today 2012, 190, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Li, M.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, X. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil Using a Heterogeneous Catalyst from Pyrolyzed Rice Husk. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 154, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Babadi, F.E.; Hosseini, S.; Soltani, S.M.; Aroua, M.K.; Shamiri, A.; Samadi, M. Sulfonated Beet Pulp as Solid Catalyst in One-Step Esterification of Industrial Palm Fatty Acid Distillate. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2016, 93, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Ramachandran, S.; Singh, S.K.; Larroche, C.; Soccol, C.R.; Pandey, A. Oil Cakes and Their Biotechnological Applications—A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2000–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Singhania, R.R.; Soccol, C.R.; Pandey, A. Application of Tropical Agro-Industrial Residues as Substrate for Solid-State Fermentation Processes. In Current Developments in Solid-State Fermentation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 412–442. [Google Scholar]
  258. Salihu, A.; Bala, M.; Bala, S.M. Application of Plackett-Burman Experimental Design for Lipase Production by Aspergillus niger Using Shea Butter Cake. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 718352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Fleuri, L.F.; de Oliveira, M.C.; de Lara Campos Arcuri, M.; Capoville, B.L.; Pereira, M.S.; Delgado, C.H.O.; Novelli, P.K. Production of Fungal Lipases Using Wheat Bran and Soybean Bran and Incorporation of Sugarcane Bagasse as a Co-Substrate in Solid-State Fermentation. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Park, S.H.; Khan, N.; Lee, S.; Zimmermann, K.; DeRosa, M.; Hamilton, L.; Hudson, W.; Hyder, S.; Serratos, M.; Sheffield, E. Biodiesel Production from Locally Sourced Restaurant Waste Cooking Oil and Grease: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance Evaluation. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 7775–7784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Suzihaque, M.U.H.; Alwi, H.; Ibrahim, U.K.; Abdullah, S.; Haron, N. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: A Brief Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 63, S490–S495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Madadian, E.; Haelssig, J.B.; Mohebbi, M.; Pegg, M. From Biorefinery Landfills towards a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis in Atlantic Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Chang, Y.; Hao, Y. Converting Waste Cooking Oil to Biodiesel in China: Environmental Impacts and Economic Feasibility. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 140, 110661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Ranjbari, M.; Esfandabadi, Z.S.; Ferraris, A.; Quatraro, F.; Rehan, M.; Nizami, A.-S.; Gupta, V.K.; Lam, S.S.; Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M. Biofuel Supply Chain Management in the Circular Economy Transition: An Inclusive Knowledge Map of the Field. Chemosphere 2022, 296, 133968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Agricultural- and industrial-based tasks in biodiesel production.
Figure 1. Agricultural- and industrial-based tasks in biodiesel production.
Energies 16 07589 g001
Figure 2. Oil extraction process.
Figure 2. Oil extraction process.
Energies 16 07589 g002
Figure 3. Oil extraction and by-products from oil cake and seed husk.
Figure 3. Oil extraction and by-products from oil cake and seed husk.
Energies 16 07589 g003
Figure 4. Various methods of oil extraction.
Figure 4. Various methods of oil extraction.
Energies 16 07589 g004
Figure 5. An outline of by-products and fuel generation from oil seeds.
Figure 5. An outline of by-products and fuel generation from oil seeds.
Energies 16 07589 g005
Table 1. Distribution, characteristics, and uses of kernel-based oil feedstocks.
Table 1. Distribution, characteristics, and uses of kernel-based oil feedstocks.
S. No.Common NameFeedstockCountryOil Content (%)UsesReference
Seed (wt%)Kernel (wt%)
1Physic nutJatropha curcasIndonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philipines, India, Pakistan, Nepal20–4040–60Lighting, lubricant,
soap making and biodiesel
[5,6,44]
2Mahuva treeMadhuca indicaIndia35–5050Biodiesel, illuminant[6,7,44]
3Pongam oil treePongamia pinnataWestern Ghats in India, Northern Australia, Fiji, and some regions of Eastern Asia25–5030–50Biodiesel, fodder, green manure[5,6,44]
4Neem seedAzardirachta indicaNative to India, Burma, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Cuba20–3025–45Oil illuminant, timber, firewood, biodiesel[5,6,7]
5Rubber seedHevea brasiliensisNigeria, India, Brazil, Southeast Asia, West Africa40–6040–50Surface coatings including paints, printing inks, rubber/plastic processing, pharmaceuticals, lubricants, cosmetics, chemical intermediates, and diesel fuel substitute/extender[6,7,51]
6Chinese tallow treeSapium sebifeumChina, France, India, Sudan, Martinique, Algeria, and the southern area of the United States13–3253–64Candles, soap, wood varnish[6,7,58,60]
7SoapnutSapindus mukorossiAsia (India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan), America, Europe51.839Rural building construction, oil and sugar presses[66,93]
8Stone kernel fruitPrunus
armeniaca L.
Turkey, Iran, Uzbekistan
-54.2Oil[77]
9CalophyllumCalophyllum inophyllum L.Tropical regions of India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines6522Cosmetics, oil, timber[89]
10Siberian apricotPrunus sibirica L.Eastern Siberia, Russia, Monogolia, and China-50.18Lubricant, surfactant, cosmetics, and medicinal uses[68]
11Tea seedCamellia
sinensis L.
Turkey, India, and China-32.1Vitamins, polyphenols, and saponins[82]
12Palm kernel oilElaeis guineensisMalaysia, Indonesia, Nigeria, Colombia,
Thailand, Zaire, and Equador
-50Soap, oleochemicals, cosmetics, soaps, toothpaste, lubricants[94]
13Java oliveSterculia foetidaAustralia, Bangladesh, Djibouti, India, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malaysia-50–60Biodiesel, medicinal, illuminant[95]
14Yellow oleanderThevetia peruvianaMexico, Brazil, America, and West indies 67Oil[48]
Table 2. Fatty acid compositions of various feedstocks.
Table 2. Fatty acid compositions of various feedstocks.
Fatty AcidsJ. curcas
[157]
(%)
M.
indica
[158]
(%)
P. pinnata [51]
(%)
A.
indica
[49]
(%)
H. brasiliensis [63]
(%)
S. sebifeum [59]
(%)
S. mukorossi [153]
(%)
P.
armeniaca [77]
(%)
C. inophyllum
[20]
(%)
P. sibirica [159]
(%)
C.
sinensis [82]
(%)
E.
guineensis [94]
(%)
S. foetida [160]
(%)
T. peruviana [157]
(%)
Caprylic-----------3.3--
Capric -----------3.4--
Lauric -----0.4---0.03-48.2--
Myristic1.41.0-0.262.20.1---0.03-16.2--
Palmitic 12.717.83.7–7.914.910.27.54.755.8513.603.7911.48.422.415.6
Palmitoleic0.7--0.1 3.710.35 0.20.67----
Stearic 5.514.02.4–8.9 8.721.742.5116.71.012.52.57.310.5
Oleic 39.146.344.5–71.343.92416.760.9563.840.165.2362.315.316.460.9
Linoleic40.417.910.8–18.317.938.627.54.5025.326.328.9220.02.345.65.2
Linolenic 0.2--0.416.341.52.450.510.30.122.2--7.4
Arachidic-3.04.11.6--4.47-0.70.09 -6.460.3
Eicosenoic --2.4--0.5918.84-0.30.110.8---
Behenic --5.30.3--0.940.660.2----0.1
Lignoceric
Total
-
100
-
100
1.–3.5
74.2
-
79.36
-
100
-
100
1.01
100
-
98.63
-
98.4
-
100
-
99.2
-
99.6
--
 
Table 3. Biodiesel production through various methodologies.
Table 3. Biodiesel production through various methodologies.
SourceCatalyst Concentration
(wt%)
Methanol to Oil Reaction
(Ratio)
Reaction Temperature
(°C)
Time
(min)
Maximum Yield (%)Ref.
J. curcasKOH—2.09 7.5:1606080.5[166]
M. indicaKOH—0.7 6:1603098[167]
P. pinnataH2SO4—1 mL6:154.5–55.56098.6[168]
A. indicaCu-ZnO 10%10:1556097.18[169]
H. brasiliensisKOH 1%6:15567.596.8[64]
S. sebifeumLipase 5% 5:14012555.22[60]
S. mukorossiH2SO4 1% and KOH 1%6:1 and 8:1603092.5[59]
P. armeniaca L.KOH—0.5%6:1556095.8[77]
C. inophyllum L.H2SO4 0.5 mL8:145–6530–15089[50]
P. sibiricaKOH-15.5:1606088.7[94]
C. sinensisNaOH—0.256:1606097.5[170]
E. guineensisNaOH6:16518087[171]
S. foetidaKOH 1.5 12:1556090.2[95]
T. peruvianaKOH 16:1553597.5[172]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sambasivam, K.M.; Kuppan, P.; Laila, L.S.; Shashirekha, V.; Tamilarasan, K.; Abinandan, S. Kernel-Based Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil Seeds: Techniques, Optimization, and Environmental Implications. Energies 2023, 16, 7589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227589

AMA Style

Sambasivam KM, Kuppan P, Laila LS, Shashirekha V, Tamilarasan K, Abinandan S. Kernel-Based Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil Seeds: Techniques, Optimization, and Environmental Implications. Energies. 2023; 16(22):7589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sambasivam, Kavitha Munisamy, Praveen Kuppan, Lafiya Shanavas Laila, Viswanaathan Shashirekha, Krishnamurthi Tamilarasan, and Sudharsanam Abinandan. 2023. "Kernel-Based Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil Seeds: Techniques, Optimization, and Environmental Implications" Energies 16, no. 22: 7589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227589

APA Style

Sambasivam, K. M., Kuppan, P., Laila, L. S., Shashirekha, V., Tamilarasan, K., & Abinandan, S. (2023). Kernel-Based Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Oil Seeds: Techniques, Optimization, and Environmental Implications. Energies, 16(22), 7589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop