Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Selected Papers from the 8th International OTEC Symposium”
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Stability and Cementation of the Surrounding Rock in Roof-Cutting and Pressure-Relief Entry under Mining Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Green Finance on Urban Haze Pollution in China: A Technological Innovation Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Empirical Test of Low-Carbon and Sustainable Financing’s Spatial Spillover Effect

1
School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
4
School of Finance and Economics, Zhenjiang College, Zhenjiang 212028, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(3), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030952
Submission received: 27 December 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022

Abstract

In this paper, the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2019 are analyzed by the spatial measure model and the threshold regression model. The results show that the air quality level is positively correlated with green finance, but there is no spatial effect. The spatial effect of the three influencing factors, including the degree of openness, the level of infrastructure, and the level of education, is the crowding-out effect. At the same time, variables such as human resource level, air quality, and infrastructure construction level all have threshold effects in the relationship between green finance and economic development. The research conclusions suggested that local governments at all levels should formulate policies according to the actual situation to promote the development of provinces’ intensive, intelligent, and green development, and build a regionally-linked green finance development model, thereby promoting the improvement of green finance.
Keywords: green finance; spatial Dubin model; influencing factors; threshold effect green finance; spatial Dubin model; influencing factors; threshold effect

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Sun, H.; Ma, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, D. An Empirical Test of Low-Carbon and Sustainable Financing’s Spatial Spillover Effect. Energies 2022, 15, 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030952

AMA Style

Sun Y, Sun H, Ma Z, Li M, Wang D. An Empirical Test of Low-Carbon and Sustainable Financing’s Spatial Spillover Effect. Energies. 2022; 15(3):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yu, Huaping Sun, Zhiqiang Ma, Mingxing Li, and Dan Wang. 2022. "An Empirical Test of Low-Carbon and Sustainable Financing’s Spatial Spillover Effect" Energies 15, no. 3: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030952

APA Style

Sun, Y., Sun, H., Ma, Z., Li, M., & Wang, D. (2022). An Empirical Test of Low-Carbon and Sustainable Financing’s Spatial Spillover Effect. Energies, 15(3), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop