Investigation of a Metallic Interconnect Extracted from an SOFC Stack after 40,000 h of Operation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. The Air Side
3.2. The Fuel Side
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hansen, J.B. Solid oxide electrolysis—A key enabling technology for sustainable energy scenarios. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 182, 9–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dincer, I. Green methods for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 37, 1954–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tao, Z.; Fu, M.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Tong, H.; Hu, W.; Lei, L.; Bi, L. High-performing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with triple-conducting cathode of Pr0.5Ba0.5(Co0.7Fe0.3)O3-δ tailored with W. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 47, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abdin, Z.; Zafaranloo, A.; Rafiee, A.; Mérida, W.; Lipinski, W.; Khalilpour, K.R. Hydrogen as an energy vector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yokokawa, H. Report of Five-Year NEDO Project on Durability/Reliability of SOFC Stacks. ECS Trans. 2013, 57, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Al-Khori, K.; Al-Ghamdi, S.; Boulfrad, S.; Koç, M. Life Cycle Assessment for Integration of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells into Gas Processing Operations. Energies 2021, 14, 4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yokokawa, H.; Horita, T.; Yamaji, K.; Kishimoto, H.; Brito, M.E. Degradation of SOFC Cell/Stack Per-formance in Relation to Materials Deterioration. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2012, 49, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fang, Q.; de Haart, U.; Schäfer, D.; Thaler, F.; Rangel-Hernandez, V.; Peters, R.; Blum, L. Degradation Analysis of an SOFC Short Stack Subject to 10,000 h of Operation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 144508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alenazey, F.; Alyousef, Y.; AlOtaibi, B.; Almutairi, G.; Minakshi, M.; Cheng, C.K.; Vo, D.-V.N. Degradation Behaviors of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks in Steady-State and Cycling Conditions. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 14864–14873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tucker, M.C. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells: A review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 24203–24218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yan, Y.; Fang, Q.; Blum, L.; Lehnert, W. Performance and degradation of an SOEC stack with different cell components. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 258, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chatzichristodoulou, C.; Chen, M.; Hendriksen, P.V.; Jacobsen, T.; Mogensen, M.B. Understanding degradation of solid oxide electrolysis cells through modeling of electrochemical potential profiles. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 189, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- The, D.; Grieshammer, S.; Schroeder, M.; Martin, M.; Al Daroukh, M.; Tietz, F.; Schefold, J.; Brisse, A. Microstructural comparison of solid oxide electrolyser cells operated for 6100 h and 9000 h. J. Power Sources 2014, 275, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Riedel, M.; Heddrich, M.; Friedrich, K.A. Analysis of pressurized operation of 10 layer solid oxide electrolysis stacks. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 4570–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anghilante, R.; Colomar, D.; Brisse, A.; Marrony, M. Bottom-up cost evaluation of SOEC systems in the range of 10–100 MW. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 20309–20322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yoo, J.; Woo, S.; Yu, J.; Lee, S.; Park, G. La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 and (Mn1.5Co1.5)O4 double layer coated by electrophoretic deposition on Crofer22 APU for SOEC interconnect applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 1542–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, X.; O’Brien, J.E.; O’Brien, R.; Hartvigsen, J.J.; Tao, G.; Housley, G.K. Improved durability of SOEC stacks for high temperature electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yokokawa, H.; Horita, T.; Sakai, N.; Yamaji, K.; Brito, M.E.; Xiong, Y.-P.; Kishimoto, H. Thermodynamic considerations on Cr poisoning in SOFC cathodes. Solid State Ion. 2006, 177, 3193–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ardigò, M.R.; Popa, I.; Chevalier, S.; Girardon, P.; Perry, F.; Laucournet, R.; Brevet, A.; Desgranges, C. Effect of coatings on long term behaviour of a commercial stainless steel for solid oxide electrolyser cell interconnect application in H2/H2O atmosphere. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 21673–21677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bianco, M.; Ouweltjes, J.P.; Van Herle, J. Degradation analysis of commercial interconnect materials for solid oxide fuel cells in stacks operated up to 18,000 h. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 31406–31422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghiara, G.; Piccardo, P.; Bongiorno, V.; Repetto, L.; Geipel, C.; Spotorno, R. Characterization of metallic interconnects extracted from Solid Oxide Fuel Cell stacks operated up to 20,000 h in real life conditions: The fuel side. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 23815–23827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghiara, G.; Piccardo, P.; Bongiorno, V.; Geipel, C.; Spotorno, R. Characterization of Metallic Interconnects Extracted from Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks Operated up to 20,000 h in Real Life Conditions: The Air Side. Energies 2020, 13, 6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bianco, M.; Caliandro, P.; Diethelm, S.; Yang, S.; Dellai, A.; Van Herle, J.; Steinberger-Wilckens, R. In-situ experimental benchmarking of solid oxide fuel cell metal interconnect solutions. J. Power Sources 2020, 461, 228163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Paravidino, D.; Piccardo, P.; Spotorno, R. A Novel Method for Evaluation of Chromium Evaporation from Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Interconnects: A Feasibility Study. Mater. Sci. Forum 2021, 1016, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- ThyssenKrupp. VDM, Crofer 22 APU—Material, Data Sheet No 4046. 2010. Available online: https://kipdf.com/vdm-crofer-22-apu-material-data-sheet-no-may-2010-edition_5ab1d0be1723dd339c808799.html (accessed on 5 May 2022).
- Quadakkers, W.J.; Shemet, V.; Singheiser, L. US Patent No.2,003,059,335, 11 September 2003.
- Timurkutluk, B.; Toros, S.; Onbilgin, S.; Korkmaz, H.G. Determination of formability characteristics of Crofer 22 APU sheets as interconnector for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 14638–14647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, J.; Liu, X. Recent Development of SOFC Metallic Interconnect. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010, 26, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jin, Y.; Sheng, J.; Hao, G.; Guo, M.; Hao, W.; Yang, Z.; Xiong, X.; Peng, S. Highly dense (Mn,Co)3O4 spinel protective coating derived from MneCo metal precursors for SOFC interconnect applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 13960–13968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mah, J.C.W.; Muchtar, A.; Somalu, M.R.; Ghazali, M.J. Metallic interconnects for solid oxide fuel cell: A review on protective coating and deposition techniques. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 9219–9229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Spotorno, R.; Paravidino, D.; Delsante, S.; Piccardo, P. Volatilization of chromium from AISI 441 stainless steel: Time and temperature dependence. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 433, 128125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bongiorno, V.; Spotorno, R.; Paravidino, D.; Piccardo, P. On the High-Temperature Oxidation and Area Specific Resistance of New Commercial Ferritic Stainless Steels. Metals 2021, 11, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Talic, B.; Venkatachalam, V.; Hendriksen, P.V.; Kiebach, R. Comparison of MnCo2O4 coated Crofer 22 H, 441, 430 as interconnects for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell stacks. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 821, 153229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Przybylski, K.; Brylewski, T.; Durda, E.; Gawel, R.; Kruk, A. Oxidation properties of the Crofer 22 APU steel coated with La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 for IT-SOFC interconnect applications. J. Therm. Anal. 2014, 116, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Si, X.; Wang, D.; Li, C.; Qi, J.; Cao, J. Exploring the role of Mn–Co spinel coating on Crofer 22 APU in adjusting reactions with the Ag based sealant during reactive air brazing. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 16, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Magdefrau, N.J.; Chen, L.; Sun, E.Y.; Yamanis, J.; Aindow, M. Formation of spinel reaction layers in manganese cobaltite—coated Crofer22 APU for solid oxide fuel cell interconnects. J. Power Sources 2013, 227, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Amendola, R.; Gannon, P.; Ellingwood, B.; Hoyt, K.; Piccardo, P.; Genocchio, P. Oxidation behavior of coated and preoxidized ferritic steel in single and dual atmosphere exposures at 800 °C. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ansara, I.; Chart, T.; Chevalier, P.Y. Phase Diagrams for FE-CR-NI Based Alloys. In Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission); Technical Report, EUR 9657; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Ohring, M. Interdiffusion, Reactions, and Transformations in Thin Films. In Materials Science of Thin Films, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; p. 641. [Google Scholar]











| Operation Type | SOFC (µCHP) |
|---|---|
| Total runtime/h | 30 k hours in field conditions using reformed hydrogen10 k hours in laboratory conditions of H2/N2 |
| Fuel gas (Co-flow) | Reformed methane: 44% N2; 34% H2; 16% CO; 4% H2O; 2% CO2H2/N2: 3% humidified |
| Nominal temperature/K | 1123 |
| Current density/mA·cm−2 | 90–200 |
| Wt. % | Cr | Fe | C | Mn | Si | Ti | La | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 20.0 | bal. | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.04 | Cu, Al | ||
| Maximum | 24.0 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Area | TGO Lower Thickness (μm) | TGO Higher Thickness (μm) |
|---|---|---|
| Inlet | 2 | 5 |
| Inlet-center | 4 | 11 |
| Center-outlet | 4 | 14 |
| Outlet | 9 | 17 |
| Area | TGO Lower Thickness (μm) | TGO Higher Thickness (μm) |
|---|---|---|
| Inlet | 6 | 8 |
| Inlet-center | 3 | 9 |
| Center-outlet | 7 | 18 |
| Outlet | 10 | 24 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Piccardo, P.; Spotorno, R.; Geipel, C. Investigation of a Metallic Interconnect Extracted from an SOFC Stack after 40,000 h of Operation. Energies 2022, 15, 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103548
Piccardo P, Spotorno R, Geipel C. Investigation of a Metallic Interconnect Extracted from an SOFC Stack after 40,000 h of Operation. Energies. 2022; 15(10):3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103548
Chicago/Turabian StylePiccardo, Paolo, Roberto Spotorno, and Christian Geipel. 2022. "Investigation of a Metallic Interconnect Extracted from an SOFC Stack after 40,000 h of Operation" Energies 15, no. 10: 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103548
APA StylePiccardo, P., Spotorno, R., & Geipel, C. (2022). Investigation of a Metallic Interconnect Extracted from an SOFC Stack after 40,000 h of Operation. Energies, 15(10), 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103548

