Next Article in Journal
Resiliency Improvement of an AC/DC Power Grid with Embedded LCC-HVDC Using Robust Power System State Estimation
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Hydrogeological Heterogeneity on CO2 Migration and Mineral Trapping: 3D Reactive Transport Modeling of Geological CO2 Storage in the Mt. Simon Sandstone, Indiana, USA
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Artificial Intelligence Forecasting Models Performance with Data Preprocessing: European Union Allowance Prices Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Technical and Economic Evaluation of CO2 Capture and Reinjection Process in the CO2 EOR and Storage Project of Xinjiang Oilfield
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Modified Multiple-Mixing-Cell Method with Sub-Cells for MMP Determinations

School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(23), 7846; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237846
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 2 November 2021 / Accepted: 20 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Sequestration)

Abstract

Minimum miscible pressure (MMP) is an essential design parameter of gas flooding for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Researchers have developed a number of methods for MMP computations, including the analytical methods, the slim-tube simulation method, and the multiple-mixing-cell (MMC) method. Among these methods, the MMC method is widely accepted for its simplicity, robustness, and moderate computational cost An important version of the MMC method is the Jaubert et al. method which has a much lower computational cost than the slim-tube simulation method. However, the original Jaubert et al. method suffers several drawbacks. One notable drawback is that it cannot be applied to the scenario where the oil-gas MMP is lower than the saturation pressure of the crude oil. In this work, we present a modified MMC method that is more versatile and robust than the original version. Our method can handle the scenario where the oil-gas MMP is lower than the saturation pressure of the crude oil. Besides, we propose a modified MMC model that can reduce the computational cost of MMP estimations. This modified model, together with a newly proposed pressure search algorithm, increases the MMP estimation accuracy of the modified method. We demonstrate the good performance of the modified MMC method by testing it in multiple case studies. A good agreement is obtained between the MMPs calculated by the modified method and the tie-line-based ones from the literature.
Keywords: minimum miscibility pressure; multiple-mixing-cell method; recovery factor; phase equilibrium calculation minimum miscibility pressure; multiple-mixing-cell method; recovery factor; phase equilibrium calculation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Li, H. A Modified Multiple-Mixing-Cell Method with Sub-Cells for MMP Determinations. Energies 2021, 14, 7846. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237846

AMA Style

Xu L, Li H. A Modified Multiple-Mixing-Cell Method with Sub-Cells for MMP Determinations. Energies. 2021; 14(23):7846. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237846

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Lingfei, and Huazhou Li. 2021. "A Modified Multiple-Mixing-Cell Method with Sub-Cells for MMP Determinations" Energies 14, no. 23: 7846. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237846

APA Style

Xu, L., & Li, H. (2021). A Modified Multiple-Mixing-Cell Method with Sub-Cells for MMP Determinations. Energies, 14(23), 7846. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237846

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop