# Virtual Inertia Control of Variable Speed Heat Pumps for the Provision of Frequency Support

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Modelling and Control Architecture

#### 2.1. Overview

#### 2.2. Thermal Model of a Residential Building

#### 2.3. Dynamic Model of the Heat Pump

#### 2.4. Enhanced Phase-Locked Loop

#### Small-Signal Model of EPLL

#### 2.5. Virtual Inertia Control

#### 2.6. Induction Machine Power Control

#### 2.7. Overall Small-Signal Model

#### 2.8. Induction Motor Power Controller Design

#### 2.9. Virtual Inertia Control Parameter Selection

#### Selection Based on the Worst Case Scenario

## 3. Hardware Validation and Single Device Characterisation

#### 3.1. Single Device Characteristics

#### 3.2. Modified VSHP System

- Case 4: ${M}_{VI}$ = 300 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 1000 Ws.
- Case 5: ${M}_{VI}$ = 100 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 1000 Ws.
- Case 6: ${M}_{VI}$ = 0 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 1000 Ws.
- Case 7: ${M}_{VI}$ = 100 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 250 Ws.
- Case 8: ${M}_{VI}$ = 0 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 250 Ws.
- Case 9: ${M}_{VI}$ = 300 Ws${}^{2}$${D}_{VI}$ = 250 Ws.

#### 3.3. Validation of VSHP Small-Signal Model

## 4. Case Study: Aggregated Response from a Population of Heat Pumps

#### 4.1. Simulation Results in the Test Distribution System

#### 4.1.1. Droop vs. Virtual Inertia Controller

#### 4.1.2. Increased Virtual Inertia Controller Installations

#### 4.1.3. Different Outdoor Temperatures

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- European Commission. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050; European Commission: Brussel, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Connolly, D.; Mathiesen, B.V.; Østergaard, P.A.; Möller, B.; Nielsen, S.; Lund, H.; Persson, U.; Werner, S.; Grözinger, J.; Boermans, T.; et al. Heat Roadmap Europe 2050. In Second Pre-study for the EU27; Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2013; p. 236. [Google Scholar]
- Davies, G.; Madden, C. Ireland’s Low Carbon Future–Dimensions of a Solution; Technical Report; ESB: Dublin, Ireland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dehghanpour, K.; Afsharnia, S. Electrical demand side contribution to frequency control in power systems: a review on technical aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2015**, 41, 1267–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Muhssin, M.T.; Cipcigan, L.M.; Jenkins, N.; Slater, S.; Cheng, M.; Obaid, Z.A. Dynamic frequency response from controlled domestic heat pumps. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2018**, 33, 4948–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Helman, U. Resource and transmission planning to achieve a 33% RPS in California–ISO modeling tools and planning framework. In Proceedings of the FERC Technical Conference on Planning Models and Software, Washington, DC, USA, 9–10 June 2010; Volume 2010, pp. 174–188. [Google Scholar]
- Masuta, T.; Yokoyama, A. Supplementary load frequency control by use of a number of both electric vehicles and water heaters. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
**2012**, 3, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, Y.J.; Norford, L.K.; Kirtley, J.L. Modeling and analysis of a variable speed for frequency regulation through direct load control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2015**, 30, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Su, L.; Norford, L.K. Demonstration of HVAC chiller control for power grid frequency regulation—Part 1: Controller development and experimental results. Sci. Technol. Built Environ.
**2015**, 21, 1134–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, Y.J.; Fuentes, E.; Norford, L.K. Experimental study of grid frequency regulation ancillary service of a variable speed heat pump. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2016**, 31, 3090–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Milano, F.; Dörfler, F.; Hug, G.; Hill, D.J.; Verbič, G. Foundations and challenges of low-inertia systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Dublin, Ireland, 11–15 June 2018; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Q.C.; Weiss, G. Synchronverters: Inverters that mimic synchronous generators. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
**2011**, 58, 1259–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mo, O.; D’Arco, S.; Suul, J.A. Evaluation of virtual synchronous machines with dynamic or quasi-stationary machine models. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
**2017**, 64, 5952–5962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Liu, J.; Miura, Y.; Ise, T. Comparison of dynamic characteristics between virtual synchronous generator and droop control in inverter-based distributed generators. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
**2016**, 31, 3600–3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Wesenbeeck, M.; De Haan, S.; Varela, P.; Visscher, K. Grid tied converter with virtual kinetic storage. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, 28 June–2 July 2009; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Driesen, J.; Visscher, K. Virtual synchronous generators. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting-Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 20–24 July 2008; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Van Thong, V.; Woyte, A.; Albu, M.; Van Hest, M.; Bozelie, J.; Diaz, J.; Loix, T.; Stanculescu, D.; Visscher, K. Virtual synchronous generator: Laboratory scale results and field demonstration. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, 28 June–2 July 2009; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Albu, M.; Visscher, K.; Creanga, D.; Nechifor, A.; Golovanov, N. Storage selection for DG applications containing virtual synchronous generators. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, 28 June–2 July 2009; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Liu, M.; O’Loughlin, C.; Milano, F.; O’Donnell, T. Modelling, simulation and hardware-in-the-loop validation of virtual synchronous generator control in low inertia power system. In Proceedings of the 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Dublin, Ireland, 11–15 June 2018; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, K.; Zheng, T.; Mei, S. A novel control strategy for stand-alone photovoltaic system based on virtual synchronous generator. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Boston, MA, USA, 17–21 July 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Morren, J.; De Haan, S.W.; Kling, W.L.; Ferreira, J. Wind turbines emulating inertia and supporting primary frequency control. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2006**, 21, 433–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Arani, M.F.M.; El-Saadany, E.F. Implementing virtual inertia in DFIG-based wind power generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2013**, 28, 1373–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ma, J.; Qiu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Song, Z.; Thorp, J.S. Research on the impact of DFIG virtual inertia control on power system small-signal stability considering the phase-locked loop. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2017**, 32, 2094–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yazdani, A.; Iravani, R. Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Systems; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 34. [Google Scholar]
- Karimi-Ghartemani, M.; Ooi, B.T.; Bakhshai, A. Application of enhanced phase-locked loop system to the computation of synchrophasors. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.
**2010**, 26, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karimi-Ghartemani, M. Linear and pseudolinear enhanced phased-locked loop (EPLL) structures. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
**2014**, 61, 1464–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elizondo, J.; Zhang, R.Y.; Huang, P.H.; White, J.K.; Kirtley, J.L. Inertial and frequency response of microgrids with induction motors. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 17th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL), Trondheim, Norway, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, N. An evaluation of the HVAC load potential for providing load balancing service. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
**2012**, 3, 1263–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rasmussen, B.P.; Alleyne, A.G. Dynamic Modeling and Advanced Control of Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Systems; Technical Report; Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Center, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Champaign, IL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- He, X.D. Dynamic Modeling and Multivariable Control of Vapor Compression Cycles in Air Conditioning Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Moradi, M.H.; Sohani, A.; Zabihigivi, M.; Wirbser, H. A comprehensive approach to find the performance map of a using experiment and soft computing methods. Energy Convers. Manag.
**2017**, 153, 224–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shintai, T.; Miura, Y.; Ise, T. Oscillation damping of a distributed generator using a virtual synchronous generator. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.
**2014**, 29, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delgado, J.; Martins, N.; Covas, D. Uncertainties in hydraulic transient modelling in raising pipe systems: Laboratory case studies. Procedia Eng.
**2014**, 70, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ibrahim, I.; Rigoni, V.; O’Loughlin, C.; Jasmin, S.; O’Donnell, T. Real Time Simulation Platform for Evaluation of Frequency Support from Distributed Demand Response. In Proceedings of the CIGRE International Symposium, Dublin, Ireland, 30 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
- ENWL. Low Voltage Networks Solutions. Available online: https://www.enwl.co.uk/zero-carbon/innovation/smaller-projects/low-carbon-networks-fund/low-voltage-network-solutions/ (accessed on 20 February 2020).
- Concordia, C.; Ihara, S. Load Representation in Power System Stability Studies. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst.
**1982**, PAS-101, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ashton, P.M.; Saunders, C.S.; Taylor, G.A.; Carter, A.M.; Bradley, M.E. Inertia estimation of the GB power system using synchrophasor measurements. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
**2014**, 30, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**A simplified schematic diagram of the VSHP model with VSMcontrol and indoor air temperature control. PFC, power factor correction; ETP, equivalent thermal parameter.

**Figure 3.**Single-phase enhanced phase-locked loop (EPLL) system with a direct estimation of amplitude, phase, frequency, and the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF).

**Figure 6.**Bode plot: (

**a**) open loop transfer function from the change in ${\widehat{\Gamma}}_{e,ref}$ to the resulting change in measured DC link power ${\widehat{P}}_{LPF}^{DC}$; (

**b**) closed loop transfer function from a change in ${\widehat{P}}_{ref}$ to the resulting change in DC power ${\widehat{P}}_{LPF}^{DC}$.

**Figure 10.**Comparison of the small-signal model with the hardware setup. (

**a**) Case 10. (

**b**) Case 11. (

**c**) Case 12. PHIL, power hardware in the loop.

**Figure 13.**Response of the distribution system for different virtual inertia controller installations.

**Table 1.**Building model parameters [5].

C (J/°C) | ${\mathit{R}}_{1}$ (°C/W) |
---|---|

3600 | 0.121 |

Number | Equation | Description |
---|---|---|

(25) | ${\widehat{\Gamma}}_{e,ref}$ = $\left(\frac{{K}_{ppc}s+{K}_{ipc}}{s}\right)({\widehat{P}}_{ref}-{\widehat{P}}_{LPF}^{DC})$ | PI controller for power to torque reference |

(26) | ${\widehat{i}}_{sq,ref}$ = $\frac{2(1+{\sigma}_{r})}{3{L}_{m}{i}_{mr}}{\widehat{\Gamma}}_{e,ref}$ | Relation between reference q-axis component |

of stator current and reference electrical torque | ||

(27) | ${\widehat{i}}_{sq}$ = $\frac{1}{{\tau}_{i}s+1}{\widehat{i}}_{sq,ref}$ | First-order system representing current controller response |

(28) | ${\widehat{\Gamma}}_{e}$ = $\frac{3{L}_{m}{i}_{mr}}{2(1+{\sigma}_{r})}{\widehat{i}}_{sq}$ | Relation between electrical torque |

and the q-axis component of stator current | ||

(31) | ${\widehat{\omega}}_{r}$ = $\frac{1}{sJ+B+\frac{{\widehat{\Gamma}}_{m}}{{\widehat{\omega}}_{r}}}{\widehat{\Gamma}}_{e}$ | Relation between compressor speed |

and electrical torque | ||

(37) | ${\widehat{P}}_{DC}$ = 3$({i}_{sq0}({L}_{a}s+{R}_{a})$ + ${v}_{sq0})$${\widehat{i}}_{sq}$ | Equation for DC bus power variation from |

+$3{L}_{s}{i}_{sq0}{i}_{sd0}{\widehat{\omega}}_{r}$ | ${\widehat{\omega}}_{r}$ and ${\widehat{i}}_{sq}$ | |

(38) | ${\widehat{P}}_{LPF}^{DC}$ = $\frac{1}{{\tau}_{LPF}^{power}s+1}{\widehat{P}}_{DC}$ | Filter used for measuring the DC bus power |

Parameter | Value | Units | Parameter | Value | Units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

${n}_{w0}$ | 0.004 | - | ${n}_{w1}$ | 0.004 | - |

${d}_{w0}$ | 4 | - | ${d}_{w1}$ | 5 | - |

${\Gamma}_{m0}$ | 1 | Nm | ${\omega}_{r0}$ | 125.664 | rads${}^{-1}$ |

${K}_{1}$ | 100 | - | ${K}_{2}$ | 10,000 | - |

${K}_{3}$ | 400 | - | ${\tau}_{LPF}^{f}$ | 0.050 | s |

${\tau}_{LPF}^{RoCoF}$ | 0.100 | s | $\rho $ | 0.050 | s |

${M}_{VI}$ | 750 | Ws${}^{2}$ | ${D}_{VI}$ | 500 | Ws |

${\tau}_{LPF}^{power}$ | 0.001 | s | ${R}_{s}$ | 2.200 | Ω |

${R}_{r}$ | 1.940 | Ω | ${L}_{m}$ | 271.780 | mH |

${L}_{s}$ | 288.780 | mH | ${L}_{r}$ | 288.780 | mH |

J | 0.0127 | kgm${}^{2}$ | B | 0.080 | Nms |

f | 50 | Hz | ${\tau}_{i}$ | 0.003 | s |

${i}_{sq0}$ | 2 | A | ${i}_{sd0}$ | 3.420 | A |

${v}_{sq0}$ | 41.667 | V | ${i}_{mr}$ | 3.420 | A |

${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{o}}$ (°C) | $\Delta {\mathit{\omega}}_{\mathit{max}}$ (rpm) | $\Delta {\mathit{P}}_{{\mathit{ref}}_{\mathit{max}}}$ (W) | $\Delta {\mathit{KE}}_{\mathit{max}}$ (Ws) |
---|---|---|---|

5 | 113 | 237.5 | 50.356 |

0 | 358.140 | 500 | 109.100 |

−5 | 608 | 761 | 187.534 |

−10 | 843 | 1022 | 285.711 |

${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{o}}$ (°C) | $\Delta {\mathit{P}}_{{\mathit{ref}}_{\mathit{max}}}$ (W) | $\Delta {\mathit{KE}}_{\mathit{max}}$ (Ws) | ${\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{VI}}$ (Ws) | ${\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{VI}}$ (W s${}^{2}$) |
---|---|---|---|---|

5 | 237.500 | 50.360 | 118.750 | 169.110 |

0 | 500 | 109.100 | 250 | 359.100 |

−5 | 76 | 187.530 | 380.500 | 568.030 |

−10 | 1022 | 285.710 | 511 | 796.710 |

Parameter | Description | Value |
---|---|---|

${P}_{frac},{Q}_{frac}$ | Fraction of total active or reactive load represented by the static model | 1, 1 |

${K}_{pi},{K}_{qi}$ | Per unit of active or reactive load that is constant current | 0.100, 0.100 |

${K}_{pc},{K}_{qc}$ | Per unit of active or reactive load that is constant power | 0.200, 0.200 |

${K}_{pz},{K}_{qz}$ | Per unit of active or reactive load that is constant impedance | 0.200, −0.252 |

${K}_{p1},{K}_{q1}$ | Per unit of active or reactive load that is voltage and frequency sensitive (Term 1) | 0.100, 0.384 |

${K}_{p2},{K}_{q2}$ | Per unit of active or reactive load that is voltage and frequency sensitive (Term 2) | 0.400, 0.572 |

${n}_{pv1},{n}_{qv1}$ | Voltage sensitivity exponent (Term 1) | 1, 3 |

${n}_{pv2},{n}_{qv2}$ | Voltage sensitivity exponent (Term 2) | 0.100, 0.500 |

${n}_{pf1},{n}_{qf1}$ | Frequency sensitivity (Term 1) | 1, −2.800 |

${n}_{pf2},{n}_{qf2}$ | Frequency sensitivity (Term 2) | 1.900, 1.200 |

Parameters | Values | Units | Parameters | Values | Units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

${P}_{gen}^{nom}$ | 2 | MW | D | 0.940 | MWs |

${P}_{base}$ | 2 | MW | R | −0.800 | MWs |

${P}_{load}$ | 1.210 | MW | ${\tau}_{t}$ | 0.020 | s |

M | 4 | MWs${}^{2}$ | ${\tau}_{g}$ | 0.010 | s |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Ibrahim, I.; O’Loughlin, C.; O’Donnell, T.
Virtual Inertia Control of Variable Speed Heat Pumps for the Provision of Frequency Support. *Energies* **2020**, *13*, 1863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081863

**AMA Style**

Ibrahim I, O’Loughlin C, O’Donnell T.
Virtual Inertia Control of Variable Speed Heat Pumps for the Provision of Frequency Support. *Energies*. 2020; 13(8):1863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081863

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Ibrahim, Ismail, Cathal O’Loughlin, and Terence O’Donnell.
2020. "Virtual Inertia Control of Variable Speed Heat Pumps for the Provision of Frequency Support" *Energies* 13, no. 8: 1863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081863