Next Article in Journal
WP3—Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry Sector for Energetic Sustainability
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Role of Stakeholder Dynamics in Residential Photovoltaic Adoption Decisions: A Synthesis of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
An Assessment of Different Integration Strategies of Hydrothermal Carbonisation and Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patterns of Energy Consumption in Polish One-Person Households
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context

by
Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis
Department of Engineering Systems and Services, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
Energies 2020, 13(22), 5984; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225984
Submission received: 22 October 2020 / Revised: 6 November 2020 / Accepted: 12 November 2020 / Published: 16 November 2020

Abstract

Energy transition is a result of mankind’s reaction to climate change and individuals are expected to have a crucial role in achieving it in developed countries. The purpose of this study is to apply the social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) tool and investigate the social performance of the Dutch energy transition while focusing on individual behavior, and if this is not possible, to develop indicators focusing on individual behavior dimension. The social performance of the energy transition in the Netherlands was assessed on a hotspot level. Additionally, the S-LCA guidelines were examined to identify the human dimension and behavior in the existing subcategories, and environmental psychology literature was explored to identify drivers and behavior that are important for the energy transition. Existing subcategories fail to show the extent of social progress of the Dutch energy transition nor how individuals perceive it. As a result, a total of 8 subcategories and 25 indicators at a hotspot and site-specific levels are developed. These subcategories and indicators focus on prosumer’s and individual’s behaviors, and traits of local communities. Application of the developed hotspot indicators shows that the Dutch government still subsidies fossil energy and, even though Dutch citizens show environmental concerns, the energy transition is delayed due to insufficient top-down coordination. Developed indicators are considered to be both feasible and relevant to investigate the social aspects of the energy transition in developed countries.
Keywords: individual; values; social life cycle assessment; prosumer; energy transition individual; values; social life cycle assessment; prosumer; energy transition

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsalidis, G.A. Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context. Energies 2020, 13, 5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225984

AMA Style

Tsalidis GA. Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context. Energies. 2020; 13(22):5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsalidis, Georgios Archimidis. 2020. "Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context" Energies 13, no. 22: 5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225984

APA Style

Tsalidis, G. A. (2020). Integrating Individual Behavior Dimension in Social Life Cycle Assessment in an Energy Transition Context. Energies, 13(22), 5984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop