Next Article in Journal
Energy Multiphase Model for Biocoal Conversion Systems by Means of a Nodal Network
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of the Risk Quantification in Traditional and Renewable Energy Markets
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Photovoltaic and Battery Storage Effects on the Load Matching Indicators Based on Real Monitored Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modified Modelling for Heat Like Equations within Caputo Operator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Efficient Analytical Approach for the Solution of Certain Fractional-Order Dynamical Systems

1
Data Recovery Lab of Sichuan Province, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641112, China
2
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641112, China
3
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
4
Department of Mathematics, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Cankaya University, 06530 Ankara, Turkey
6
Institute of Space Sciences, 077125 Magurele-Bucharest, Romania
7
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(11), 2725; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112725
Submission received: 18 March 2020 / Revised: 11 May 2020 / Accepted: 12 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical and Statistical Models for Energy with Applications)

Abstract

:
Mostly, it is very difficult to obtained the exact solution of fractional-order partial differential equations. However, semi-analytical or numerical methods are considered to be an alternative to handle the solutions of such complicated problems. To extend this idea, we used semi-analytical procedures which are mixtures of Laplace transform, Shehu transform and Homotopy perturbation techniques to solve certain systems with Caputo derivative differential equations. The effectiveness of the present technique is justified by taking some examples. The graphical representation of the obtained results have confirmed the significant association between the actual and derived solutions. It is also shown that the suggested method provides a higher rate of convergence with a very small number of calculations. The problems with derivatives of fractional-order are also solved by using the present method. The convergence behavior of the fractional-order solutions to an integer-order solution is observed. The convergence phenomena described a very broad concept of the physical problems. Due to simple and useful implementation, the current methods can be used to solve problems containing the derivative of a fractional-order.

1. Introduction

Coupled schemes of fractional-order partial differential equations (PDEs) are commonly applied in phenomena that occur in biomechanics and engineering. Various implementations of coupled PDE schemes arise in the modeling of electrical movement of the heart in biomechanics (see, for instance, [1,2,3]). They similarly occur when modeling other problems in biochemical and physical engineering, such as a device that includes a continuous stirred boiler container and a series plug or container [4,5]. The coupled FPDEs can be used for the combination of different-deformable objects with a fractional-order continuum of standard lightly surfaces [6,7]. Coupled PDE schemes also occur in modeling several significant gravitational and electromagnetic problems (see, for instance, [8,9,10,11,12,13]).
In 1965, Harry Bateman introduced a differential equation [14], which was later renamed as the Burger equation [15]. In science and engineering, the Burger equation has several implementations, particularly in problems that have the structure of non-linear problems. The Burger equation has interesting and important applications and defines various types of physical processes such as dynamic modeling, turbulence, acoustic waves heat transfer, and several others [16,17,18]. In many other cases, this type of non-linear PDE should be addressed utilizing special techniques because it does not support analytical approaches. In modern years, several scholars and mathematicians have developed an analytical technique for the solution of fractional-order problems such as the high order spectral volume formulation of Kannan et al. [19,20,21,22,23], homotopy perturbation (HPM), differential transformation, homotopy analysis, variational iteration and Adomian decomposition methods [24,25,26,27,28].
Recently, researchers have shown a greater interest in the study of fractional-calculus and Fractional differential equations (FDEs). Several important implementations have been explored in a number of different fields [29,30,31,32,33]. Researchers have also shown that several engineering and practical phenomena can be described well by FDEs systems as compared to classical differential equation systems and that equivalent FDEs and fractional integral equations give better precise and practical insights into the systems under discussion [34,35,36,37,38]. Many of these engineering challenging problems are addressed by using deterministic mathematical models that are represented by either partial differential equations of integer order or fractional-order. These mathematical models can further be classified into a scheme of ordinary differential equations, integro differential equations, and partial differential equations [39,40]. The existence of fractional differential equations is also discussed in [41]. In 1998, He [42,43] introduced HPM. In this technique, the solution is assumed to be in series form with a large number of terms that converge quickly towards the actual derived solution. The technique has the capability to solve nonlinear PDEs adequately. The HPTM results were compared with the actual solution to the problems and confirmed a higher degree of accuracy. This technique has also been used to solve address non-linear wave equations [44], bifurcation of nonlinear problems [45], and boundary value problems [46].
In the present research work, an efficient analytical technique is utilized to solve fractional-order Burger equations. The current is found to be very effective for the systems of FDEs. The present methodology is very attractive and has less computational cost. The present technique has shown a sufficient degree of accuracy.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we present fractional calculus definitions along with properties of Laplace and Shehu transform theory.
Definition 1.
The Rieman–Liouville fractional integral is defined by [47,48,49]
I 0 γ h ( τ ) = 1 Γ ( γ ) 0 τ ( τ s ) γ 1 h ( s ) d s ,
showing that the integral on the right side converges.
Definition 2.
Caputo’s fractional-order derivative of h ( τ ) is given as [47,48,49]
D τ γ h ( τ ) = I n γ f n , n 1 < γ < n , n N d n d τ n h ( τ ) , γ = n , n N .
Definition 3.
Shehu transformation is new and similar to other integral transformation which is defined for functions of exponential order. We take a function in the set A define by [50,51,52,53]
A = { ν ( τ ) : , ρ 1 , ρ 2 > 0 , | ν ( τ ) | < M e | τ | ρ i , i f τ [ 0 , ) ,
The Shehu transformation which is defined by S ( . ) for a function ν ( τ ) is expressed as
S { ν ( τ ) } = V ( s , μ ) = 0 ν ( τ ) e s τ μ ν ( τ ) d τ , τ > 0 , s > 0 .
The Shehu transformation of a function ν ( τ ) is V ( s , μ ) : then ν ( τ ) is called the inverse of V ( s , μ ) which is defined as
S 1 V ( s , μ ) = ν ( τ ) , f o r τ 0 , S 1 is inverse Shehu transformation .
Definition 4.
Shehu transform for nth derivatives. The Shehu transformation for nth derivatives is defined as [50,51,52,53]
S ν ( n ) ( τ ) = s n u n V ( s , u ) k = 0 n 1 s u n k 1 ν ( k ) ( 0 ) .
Definition 5
(Shehu transform for fractional order derivatives [50,51,52,53]). The Shehu transformation for the fractional order derivatives is expressed as
S ν ( γ ) ( τ ) = s γ u γ V ( s , u ) k = 0 n 1 s u γ k 1 ν ( k ) ( 0 ) , 0 < β n ,

3. Homotopy Perturbation Shehu Transform Method

In this section, we explain the main idea of Homotopy Perturbation Shehu Transform Method [50,51,52,53].
D τ γ ξ ( ν , τ ) + M ξ ( ν , τ ) + N ξ ( ν , τ ) = h ( ν , τ ) , τ > 0 , 0 < γ 1 , ξ ( ν , 0 ) = g ( ν ) , ν .
where D τ γ = γ τ γ is Caputo’s derivative, M, N are the linear and nonlinear operators in ν and h ( ν , τ ) represents source terms.
Using Shehu transform, we can write Equation (8) as [50,51,52,53]
S [ D τ γ ξ ( ν , τ ) + M ξ ( ν , τ ) + N ξ ( ν , τ ) ] = S [ h ( ν , τ ) ] , τ > 0 , 0 < γ 1 , R ( ν , s , u ) = g ( ν ) s + u γ s γ S [ h ( ν , τ ) ] u γ s γ S [ M ξ ( ν , τ ) + N ξ ( ν , τ ) ] .
Now, by taking inverse Shehu transform, we get [50,51,52,53]
ξ ( ν , τ ) = F ( ν , τ ) S 1 u γ s γ S [ M ξ ( ν , τ ) + N ξ ( ν , τ ) ] ,
where
F ( ν , τ ) = S 1 [ g ( ν ) s + u γ s γ S [ h ( ν , τ ) ] ] = g ( ν ) + S 1 u γ s γ S [ h ( ν , τ ) ] .
Now, perturbation technique having parameter ϵ in the form of power series is given as
ξ ( ν , τ ) = k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) ,
where ϵ is perturbation parameter and ϵ [ 0 , 1 ] .
The nonlinear term can be expressed as
N ξ ( ν , τ ) = k = 0 ϵ k H k ( ξ k ) ,
where H n are He’s polynomials in term of ξ 0 , ξ 1 , ξ 2 , . . . , ξ n , and can be determined as
H n ( ξ 0 , ξ 1 , , ξ n ) = 1 γ ( n + 1 ) D ϵ k N k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ϵ = 0 ,
where D ϵ k = k ϵ k .
Putting Equations (13) and (14) in Equation (10) and introducing the Homotopy, we get the couple of HPSTM as
k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) = F ( ν , τ ) ϵ × S 1 u γ s γ S { M k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) + k = 0 ϵ k H k ( ξ k ) } .
On comparing coefficient of ϵ on both sides, we obtain
ϵ 0 : ξ 0 ( ν , τ ) = F ( ν , τ ) , ϵ 1 : ξ 1 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S ( M ξ 0 ( ν , τ ) + H 0 ( ξ ) ) , ϵ 2 : ξ 2 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S ( M ξ 1 ( ν , τ ) + H 1 ( ξ ) ) , ϵ k : ξ k ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S ( M ξ k 1 ( ν , τ ) + H k 1 ( ξ ) ) , k > 0 , k N .
The component ξ k ( ν , τ ) can be calculated easily, which leads us to the convergent series rapidly. By taking ϵ 1 , we obtain
ξ ( ν , τ ) = lim M k = 1 M ξ k ( ν , τ ) .
Similarly, the procedure of the Laplace transform as special case for u = 1 of Shehu transform is used to derived similar results as Shehu transformation.

4. Applications

In this section, the solutions of numerical examples are presented to confirm the validity of the suggested methods.
Example 1.
Consider the following system of fractional-order Burger’s equations [54,55,56]
ξ τ γ ξ ν ν 2 ξ ξ ν + ( ξ ζ ) ν = 0 ζ τ γ ζ ν ν 2 ζ ζ ν + ( ξ ζ ) ν = 0
with initial conditions
ξ ( ν , 0 ) = sin ( ν ) , ζ ( ν , 0 ) = sin ( ν ) ,
Taking the Shehu Transform of Equation (18), we have
s γ u γ S [ ξ ( ν , τ ) ] = ξ ( 0 ) ( ν , 0 ) s γ 1 u γ + S ξ ν ν + 2 ξ ξ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν , s γ u γ S [ ζ ( ν , τ ) ] = ζ ( 0 ) ( ν , 0 ) s γ 1 u γ + S ζ ν ν + 2 ζ ζ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν ,
S [ ξ ( ν , τ ) ] = 1 s sin ( ν ) + u γ s γ S ξ ν ν + 2 ξ ξ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν , S [ ζ ( ν , τ ) ] = 1 s sin ( ν ) + u γ s γ S ζ ν ν + 2 ζ ζ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν .
Taking Inverse Shehu Transform, we obtain
ξ ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) + S 1 u γ s γ S ξ ν ν + 2 ξ ξ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν , ζ ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) + S 1 u γ s γ S ζ ν ν + 2 ζ ζ ν ( ξ ζ ) ν .
By applying homotopy perturbation method as in Equation (16), we get
k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) + ϵ S 1 u γ s γ S k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) ν ν + 2 k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) ν k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) ν k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) + ϵ S 1 u γ s γ S k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) ν ν + 2 k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) ν k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , τ ) k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , τ ) ν
On comparing coefficient of ϵ on both sides, we obtain
ϵ 0 : ξ 0 ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) ϵ 0 : ζ 0 ( ν , τ ) = sin ( ν ) ϵ 1 : ξ 1 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ξ 0 ν ν + 2 ξ 0 ξ 0 ν ( ξ 0 ζ 0 ) ν ] = τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) ϵ 1 : ζ 1 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ζ 0 ν ν + 2 ζ 0 ζ 0 ν ( ξ 0 ζ 0 ) ν ] = τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) ϵ 2 : ξ 2 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ξ 1 ν ν + 2 ( ξ 1 ξ 0 ν + ξ 0 ξ 1 ν ) ( ξ 1 ζ 0 + ξ 0 ζ 1 ) ν ] = τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) ϵ 2 : ζ 2 ( ν , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ζ 1 ν ν + 2 ( ζ 1 ζ 0 ν + ζ 0 ζ 1 ν ) ( ξ 1 ζ 0 + ξ 0 ζ 1 ) ν ] = τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) sin ( ν )
Thus, by taking ϵ 1 we get convergent series form solution as
ξ ( ν , τ ) = ξ 0 + ξ 1 + ξ 2 + = sin ( ν ) τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) + = sin ( ν ) 1 τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + ζ ( ν , τ ) = ζ 0 + ζ 1 + ζ 2 + = sin ( ν ) τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) sin ( ν ) + = sin ( ν 1 τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) +
Particularly, putting γ = 1 , we get the exact solution
ξ ( ν , τ ) = exp τ sin ( ν ) ζ ( ν , τ ) = exp τ sin ( ν )
The homotopy perturbation Laplace transform method which is the special case for u = 1 of the homotopy perturbation Shehu transform method is used to obtain the same results of Example 1.
In Figure 1, the graphs a and b represent the exact and HPSTM solutions of Example 1. It is observed that the exact and HPSTM solutions are in closed contact and justify the validity of the proposed method. In Figure 2, the sub-graphs a and b have shown the plot of HPSTM solutions at various fractional-order of the derivatives in two and one dimensions of Example 1 respectively. The convergence phenomena of the fractional-order solutions towards integer-order solution is observed by using sub-graphs a and b.
In Table 1, the solutions of Example 1 at fractional-orders γ = 0.8 , 1 have been investigated. For this purpose, the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) with two different transformations is implemented to obtain the solutions. The results of HPM, homotopy perturbation Laplace transform method (HPLTM) and homotopy perturbation Shehu transform method (HPSTM) are compared in Table 1 for the variable ξ and ζ . The comparison has confirmed the best contact among the solutions of the suggested methods. The comparisons have been done in terms of absolute error. It is analyzed from the table that the proposed techniques have the desire degree of accuracy towards the exact solution of the problems.
Example 2.
Consider the following system of fractional PDEs [47]
ξ τ γ + ζ ν η μ ζ μ η ν = ξ ζ τ γ + η ν ξ μ ξ ν η μ = ζ η τ γ + ξ ν ζ μ ξ μ ζ ν = η ,
with initial conditions
ξ ( ν , μ , 0 ) = exp ν + μ ζ ( ν , μ , 0 ) = exp ν μ η ( ν , μ , 0 ) = exp μ ν
Taking Shehu Transform of Equation (27), we have
s γ u γ S [ ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = ξ ( 0 ) ( ν , μ , 0 ) s γ 1 u γ + S ζ ν η μ + ζ μ η ν ξ . s γ u γ S [ ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = ζ ( 0 ) ( ν , μ , 0 ) s γ 1 u γ + S η ν ξ μ + ξ ν η μ + ζ . s γ u γ S [ η ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = η ( 0 ) ( ν , μ , 0 ) s γ 1 u γ + S ξ ν ζ μ + ξ μ ζ ν + η .
S [ ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = 1 s exp ν + μ + u γ s γ S ζ ν η μ + ζ μ η ν ξ S [ ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = 1 s exp ν μ + u γ s γ S η ν ξ μ + ξ ν η μ + ζ S [ η ( ν , μ , τ ) ] = 1 s exp μ ν + u γ s γ S ξ ν ζ μ + ξ μ ζ ν + η
Taking Inverse Shehu Transform, we get
ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν + μ + S 1 u γ s γ S ζ ν η μ + ζ μ η ν ξ . ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν μ + S 1 u γ s γ S η ν ξ μ + ξ ν η μ + ζ . η ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp μ ν + S 1 u γ s γ S ξ ν ζ μ + ξ μ ζ ν + η .
By applying homotopy perturbation method as in Equation (16), we get
k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , μ , τ ) = e ν + μ + ϵ S 1 u γ s γ S k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ν , μ , τ ν k = 0 ϵ k η k ν , μ , τ y + k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ν , μ , τ μ k = 0 ϵ k η k ν , μ , τ ν k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ν , μ , τ , k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ν , μ , τ = e ν μ + ϵ S 1 u γ s γ S k = 0 ϵ k η k ν , μ , τ ν k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ν , μ , τ μ + k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ν , μ , τ ν k = 0 ϵ k η k ν , μ , τ μ + k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ν , μ , τ , k = 0 ϵ k η k ν , μ , τ = e μ ν + ϵ S 1 u γ s γ S k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ν , μ , τ ν k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ν , μ , τ μ + k = 0 ϵ k ξ k ( ν , μ , τ ) μ k = 0 ϵ k ζ k ( ν , μ , τ ) μ + k = 0 ϵ k η k ( ν , μ , τ ) .
On comparing coefficient of ϵ on both sides, we obtain
ϵ 0 : ξ 0 ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν + μ ϵ 0 : ζ 0 ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν μ ϵ 0 : η 0 ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp μ ν ϵ 1 : ξ 1 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ζ 0 ν η 0 μ + ζ 0 μ η 0 ν ξ 0 ] = τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp ν + μ ϵ 1 : ζ 1 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ η 0 ν ξ 0 μ + ξ 0 ν η 0 μ + ζ 0 ] = τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp ν μ ϵ 1 : η 1 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ξ 0 ν ζ 0 μ + ξ 0 μ ζ 0 ν + η 0 ] = τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp ν + μ ϵ 2 : ξ 2 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ( ζ 1 μ η 0 ν + ζ 0 μ η 1 ν ) ( ζ 1 ν η 0 ν + ζ 0 ν η 1 μ ) ξ 1 ] = τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp ν + μ ϵ 2 : ζ 2 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ ζ 1 ( η 1 ν ξ 0 μ + η 0 ν ξ 1 μ ) ( ξ 1 ν η 0 μ + ξ 0 ν η 1 μ ) ] = τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp ν μ ϵ 2 : η 2 ( ν , μ , τ ) = S 1 u γ s γ S [ η 1 ( ξ 1 ν ζ 0 μ + ξ 0 ν ζ 1 μ ) ( ξ 1 μ ζ 0 ν + ξ 0 μ ζ 1 ν ) ] = τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp μ ν
Thus, by taking ϵ 1 we get convergent series form solution as
ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) = ξ 0 + ξ 1 + ξ 2 + = exp ν + μ τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp ν + μ + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp ν + μ + = exp ν + μ 1 τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) = ζ 0 + ζ 1 + ζ 2 + = exp ν μ + τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp ν μ + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp ν μ + = exp ν μ 1 + τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + η ( ν , μ , τ ) = η 0 + η 1 + η 2 + = exp μ ν + τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) exp μ ν + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) exp μ ν + = exp μ ν 1 + τ γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + τ 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) +
particularly, putting γ = 1 , we get the exact solution of Equation (27)
ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν + μ τ ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp ν μ + τ η ( ν , μ , τ ) = exp μ ν + τ
Using the Laplace homotopy perturbation method, the same results are derived for Example 2, because Laplace transformation is the special case for u = 1 of Shehu transformation.
In Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 the sub-graphs a and b are respectively the graphs of the exact and HPSTM solutions at γ = 1 of example 2 for variables ξ , ζ and η . The graphical representation has confirmed the closed contact of the exact solution with HPSTM solution. In Figure 6, the sub-graphs a and b have shown the plot of HPSTM solutions at various fractional-order of the derivatives in two dimensions of Example 2 for variables ξ and ζ respectively. In Figure 7, the sub-graphs a and b have shown the plot of HPSTM solutions at various fractional-order of the derivatives in two and one dimensions of Example 2 for variable η respectively. The convergence phenomena of the fractional-order solutions towards integer-order solution is observed by using sub-graphs a and b.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, some systems of FPDEs are solved by the homotopy perturbation method along with Laplace and Shehu transformations. The derivatives with fractional-order are expressed in term of the Caputo operator. The suggested technique is implemented to find the solution of certain numerical examples. The solutions of these illustrative examples are determined for derivatives at different fractional-orders. The significant extent between the actual and approximate solutions is observed. Furthermore, fractional solutions are found to be convergent to integer-order solution for every targeted problem. It is observed that the proposed methods are simple, straightforward, have low computational cost, and can be modified for the solutions of FPDEs in science and engineering. In future, the proposed method can be extended to find the analytical solutions of nonlinear higher dimension fractional partial differential equations and systems of fractional partial differential equations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S. and H.K.; Methodology, R.S; Software, A.K.; Validation, D.B. and Y.Q.; Formal Analysis, I.A.; Investigation, R.S. and A.K.; Resources, H.K. and A.K.; Data Curation, R.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, H.K., D.B. and A.K.; Visualization, M.A.Q.; Supervision, M.A.Q., H.K.; Project Administration, H.K.; Funding Acquisition, Y.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team (No. 2019JDTD0015); The Application Basic research Project of Department of Education of Sucgyabb province (18ZA0273, !5T0027); The Scientific Research Project of Neijiang Normal University (18TD08).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The numerical data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  1. Linge, S.; Sundnes, J.; Hanslien, M.; Lines, G.T.; Tveito, A. Numerical solution of the bidomain equations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2009, 367, 1931–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sundnes, J.; Lines, G.T.; Mardal, K.A.; Tveito, A. Multigrid block preconditioning for a coupled system of partial differential equations modeling the electrical activity in the heart. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 5, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sundnes, J.; Lines, G.T.; Tveito, A. An operator splitting method for solving the bidomain equations coupled to a volume conductor model for the torso. Math. Biosci. 2005, 194, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aksikas, I.; Fuxman, A.; Forbes, J.F.; Winkin, J.J. LQ control design of a class of hyperbolic PDE systems: Application to fixed-bed reactor. Automatica 2009, 45, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moghadam, A.A.; Aksikas, I.; Dubljevic, S.; Forbes, J.F. LQ control of coupled hyperbolic PDEs and ODEs: Application to a CSTR-PFR system. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2010, 43, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fackeldey, K.; Krause, R. Multiscale coupling in function space—Weak coupling between molecular dynamics and continuum mechanics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2009, 79, 1517–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hedrih, K.R. Fractional order hybrid system dynamics. PAMM 2013, 13, 25–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, L.L.; Li, Z.Y.; Lin, B. Engineering waveguide-cavity resonant side coupling in a dynamically tunable ultracompact photonic crystal filter. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 165330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahmood, S.; Shah, R.; Arif, M. Laplace Adomian Decomposition Method for Multi Dimensional Time Fractional Model of Navier-Stokes Equation. Symmetry 2019, 11, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. An analytical technique to solve the system of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. Mathematics 2019, 7, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Baleanu, D. Fractional Whitham–Broer–Kaup Equations within Modified Analytical Approaches. Axioms 2019, 8, 125. [Google Scholar]
  12. Srivastava, H.M.; Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Arif, M. Some analytical and numerical investigation of a family of fractional-order Helmholtz equations in two space dimensions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2020, 43, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wald, R.M. Construction of solutions of gravitational, electromagnetic, or other perturbation equations from solutions of decoupled equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1978, 41, 203. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bateman, H. Some recent researches on the motion of fluids. Mon. Weather. Rev. 1915, 43, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, H.; Khan, A.; Al-Qurashi, M.; Shah, R.; Baleanu, D. Modified Modelling for Heat Like Equations within Caputo Operator. Energies 2020, 13, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Naghipour, A.; Manafian, J. Application of the Laplace Adomian decomposition and implicit methods for solving Burgers’ equation. TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 6, 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rashidi, M.M.; Erfani, E. New analytical method for solving Burgers’ and nonlinear heat transfer equations and comparison with HAM. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moslem, W.M.; Sabry, R. Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burger’s equation for dust ion acoustic waves. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 36, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kannan, R.; Wang, Z.J. A study of viscous flux formulations for a p-multigrid spectral volume Navier stokes solver. J. Sci. Comput. 2009, 41, 165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kannan, R.; Wang, Z.J. LDG2: A variant of the LDG flux formulation for the spectral volume method. J. Sci. Comput. 2011, 46, 314–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kannan, R.; Wang, Z.J. The direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) viscous flux scheme for the high order spectral volume method. Comput. Fluids 2010, 39, 2007–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kannan, R. A high order spectral volume formulation for solving equations containing higher spatial derivative terms: Formulation and analysis for third derivative spatial terms using the LDG discretization procedure. Commun. Comput. Phys. 2011, 10, 1257–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Baleanu, D.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. A semi-analytical method to solve family of Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equations. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2020, 14, 402–411. [Google Scholar]
  24. Adomian, G. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method, with a Preface by Yves Cherruault; Fundamental Theories of Physics, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, J.H. Variational iteration method–a kind of non-linear analytical technique: Some examples. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 1999, 34, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Baleanu, D.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. The analytical investigation of time-fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation. Alexandria Eng. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liao, S.J. Beyond Perturbation: Introduction to the Homotopy Analysis Method; Champan Hall, CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, J.K. Differential Transformation and Its Applications for Electrical Circuits; Huazhong University Press: Wuhan, China, 1986; pp. 1279–1289. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hilfer, R. Fractional diffusion based on Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 3914–3917. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ibrahim, R.W. Solutions to systems of arbitrary-order differential equations in complex domains. Electron. J. Differ. Equations 2014, 46, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan, H.; Shah, R.; Baleanu, D.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. Analytical Solution of Fractional-Order Hyperbolic Telegraph Equation, Using Natural Transform Decomposition Method. Electronics 2019, 8, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Mustafa, S.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. Analytical Solutions of Fractional-Order Diffusion Equations by Natural Transform Decomposition Method. Entropy 2019, 21, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Oldham, K.B. Fractional differential equations in electrochemistry. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2010, 41, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scalas, E.; Gorenflo, R.; Mainardi, F. Fractional calculus and continuous-time finance. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 2000, 284, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, F.; Anh, V.; Turner, I. Numerical solution of the space fractional Fokker–Planck equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2004, 166, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Maleknejad, K.; Shahrezaee, M.; Khatami, H. Numerical solution of integral equations system of the second kind by block–pulse functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 166, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  37. Khan, H.; Shah, R.; Arif, M.; Bushnaq, S. The Chebyshev Wavelet Method (CWM) for the Numerical Solution of Fractional HIV Infection of CD4+T Cells Model. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2020, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ali, I.; Khan, H.; Shah, R.; Baleanu, D.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. Fractional View Analysis of Acoustic Wave Equations, Using Fractional-Order Differential Equations. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 610. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jan, R.; Xiao, Y. Effect of partial immunity on transmission dynamics of dengue disease with optimal control. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2019, 42, 1967–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jan, R.; Xiao, Y. Effect of pulse vaccination on dynamics of dengue with periodic transmission functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 1, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lazopoulos, K.; Lazopoulos, A. On the mathematical formulation of fractional derivatives. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2019, 5, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  42. He, J.H. Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999, 178, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, J.H. A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2000, 35, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, J.H. Application of homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear wave equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 26, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, J.H. Homotopy perturbation method for bifurcation of nonlinear problems. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2005, 6, 207–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, J.H. Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems. Phys. Lett. 2006, 350, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jafari, H.; Nazari, M.; Baleanu, D.; Khalique, C.M. A new approach for solving a system of fractional partial differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2013, 66, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Machado, J.; Baleanu, D.; Chen, W.; Sabatier, J. New trends in fractional dynamics. J. Vib. Control SAGE Public. 2014, 20, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Baleanu, D.; Guvenc, Z.; Machado, J. New Trends in Nanotechnology and Fractional Calculus Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Maitama, S.; Zhao, W. New integral transform: Shehu transform a generalization of Sumudu and Laplace transform for solving differential equations. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.11370. [Google Scholar]
  51. Khan, H.; Farooq, U.; Shah, R.; Baleanu, D.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. Analytical Solutions of (2+ Time Fractional Order) Dimensional Physical Models, Using Modified Decomposition Method. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bokhari, A.; Baleanu, D.; Belgacem, R. Application of Shehu transform to Atangana-Baleanu derivatives. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2019, 20, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Belgacem, R.; Baleanu, D.; Bokhari, A. Shehu Transform and Applications to Caputo-Fractional Differential Equations. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2019, 17, 917–927. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yıldırım, A.; Kelleci, A. Homotopy perturbation method for numerical solutions of coupled Burger’s equations with time-and space-fractional derivatives. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 2010, 20, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maitama, S. A hybrid natural transform homotopy perturbation method for solving fractional partial differential equations. Int. J. Differ. Equ 2016, 2016, 9207869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Prakash, A.; Verma, V.; Kumar, D.; Singh, J. Analytic study for fractional coupled Burger’s equations via Sumudu transform method. Nonlinear Eng. 2018, 7, 323–332. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Plot of (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solutions of ξ γ = 1 for Example 1.
Figure 1. Plot of (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solutions of ξ γ = 1 for Example 1.
Energies 13 02725 g001
Figure 2. The plot of HPSTM solutions of ζ example 1 at (a) various values of γ (b) τ = 0.5 .
Figure 2. The plot of HPSTM solutions of ζ example 1 at (a) various values of γ (b) τ = 0.5 .
Energies 13 02725 g002
Figure 3. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of ξ Example 2, at γ = 1 .
Figure 3. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of ξ Example 2, at γ = 1 .
Energies 13 02725 g003
Figure 4. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of ζ Example 2, at γ = 1 .
Figure 4. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of ζ Example 2, at γ = 1 .
Energies 13 02725 g004
Figure 5. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of η Example 2, γ = 1 .
Figure 5. (a) Exact (b) HPSTM solution graph of η Example 2, γ = 1 .
Energies 13 02725 g005
Figure 6. The HPSTM solutions plot are represented by (a,b) for variables ξ and ζ respectively at γ = 1 , 0.8 , 0.6 and 0.5 of ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) and ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) .
Figure 6. The HPSTM solutions plot are represented by (a,b) for variables ξ and ζ respectively at γ = 1 , 0.8 , 0.6 and 0.5 of ξ ( ν , μ , τ ) and ζ ( ν , μ , τ ) .
Energies 13 02725 g006
Figure 7. The (a) represents HPSTM solution of example 2 at different fractional orders of γ and (b) τ = 0.5 of η ( ν , μ , τ ) .
Figure 7. The (a) represents HPSTM solution of example 2 at different fractional orders of γ and (b) τ = 0.5 of η ( ν , μ , τ ) .
Energies 13 02725 g007
Table 1. HPLTM, HPSTM and HPM solutions comparison of Example 1 at ξ ( ν , τ ) and ζ ( ν , τ ) for different fractional-order of γ absolute error.
Table 1. HPLTM, HPSTM and HPM solutions comparison of Example 1 at ξ ( ν , τ ) and ζ ( ν , τ ) for different fractional-order of γ absolute error.
HPLTMHPLTMHPSTMHPSTMHPM [54]HPM [54]
τ ν γ = 0.8 γ = 1 γ = 0.8 γ = 1 γ = 0.8 γ = 1
18.19373 × 10 5 7.06835 × 10 8 8.19373 × 10 5 7.06835 × 10 8 8.19373 × 10 5 7.06835 × 10 8
28.85419 × 10 5 7.63809 × 10 8 8.85419 × 10 5 7.63809 × 10 8 8.85419 × 10 5 7.63809 × 10 8
0.131.37414 × 10 5 1.18540 × 10 8 1.37414 × 10 5 1.18540 × 10 8 1.37414 × 10 5 1.18540 × 10 8
47.36928 × 10 5 6.35714 × 10 8 7.36928 × 10 5 6.35714 × 10 8 7.36928 × 10 5 6.35714 × 10 8
59.33742 × 10 5 8.05496 × 10 8 9.33742 × 10 5 8.05496 × 10 8 9.33742 × 10 5 8.05496 × 10 8
11.40490 × 10 4 2.32077 × 10 6 1.40490 × 10 4 2.32077 × 10 6 1.40490 × 10 4 2.32077 × 10 6
21.51814 × 10 4 2.50784 × 10 6 1.51814 × 10 4 2.50784 × 10 6 1.51814 × 10 4 2.50784 × 10 6
0.232.35611 × 10 4 3.89208 × 10 6 2.35611 × 10 4 3.89208 × 10 6 2.35611 × 10 4 3.89208 × 10 6
41.26354 × 10 4 2.08726 × 10 6 1.26354 × 10 4 2.08726 × 10 6 1.26354 × 10 4 2.08726 × 10 6
51.60100 × 10 4 2.64471 × 10 6 1.60100 × 10 4 2.64471 × 10 6 1.60100 × 10 4 2.64471 × 10 6
11.92364 × 10 4 1.79300 × 10 5 1.92364 × 10 4 1.79300 × 10 5 1.92364 × 10 4 1.79300 × 10 5
22.07869 × 10 4 1.93753 × 10 5 2.07869 × 10 4 1.93753 × 10 5 2.07869 × 10 4 1.93753 × 10 5
0.333.22607 × 10 4 3.00698 × 10 5 3.22607 × 10 4 3.00698 × 10 5 3.22607 × 10 4 3.00698 × 10 5
41.73008 × 10 4 1.61259 × 10 5 1.73008 × 10 4 1.61259 × 10 5 1.73008 × 10 4 1.61259 × 10 5
52.19214 × 10 4 2.04327 × 10 5 2.19214 × 10 4 2.04327 × 10 5 2.19214 × 10 4 2.04327 × 10 5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, Y.; Khan, A.; Ali, I.; Al Qurashi, M.; Khan, H.; Shah, R.; Baleanu, D. An Efficient Analytical Approach for the Solution of Certain Fractional-Order Dynamical Systems. Energies 2020, 13, 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112725

AMA Style

Qin Y, Khan A, Ali I, Al Qurashi M, Khan H, Shah R, Baleanu D. An Efficient Analytical Approach for the Solution of Certain Fractional-Order Dynamical Systems. Energies. 2020; 13(11):2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Ya, Adnan Khan, Izaz Ali, Maysaa Al Qurashi, Hassan Khan, Rasool Shah, and Dumitru Baleanu. 2020. "An Efficient Analytical Approach for the Solution of Certain Fractional-Order Dynamical Systems" Energies 13, no. 11: 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop