Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Robust Control System for Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor of Electric Medium Bus Based on Torque Optimal Distribution Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Bio-Briquette Fuel by Using Spent Coffee Ground as an External Additive
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Optimization of a Multi-Element Hydrofoil for a Horizontal-Axis Hydrokinetic Turbine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Forestry Wood Waste for Bio-Energy Recovery Using Nano-Catalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.)

1
Department of Biobased Products and Energy Crops (340b), Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
2
College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(24), 4680; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244680
Submission received: 11 November 2019 / Revised: 27 November 2019 / Accepted: 2 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass for Energy Application)

Abstract

This study reports on the effects of two rhizome-based establishment procedures ‘miscanthus under maize’ (MUM) and ‘reference’ (REF) on the methane yield per hectare (MYH) of miscanthus in a field trial in southwest Germany. The dry matter yield (DMY) of aboveground biomass was determined each year in autumn over four years (2016–2019). A biogas batch experiment and a fiber analysis were conducted using plant samples from 2016–2018. Overall, MUM outperformed REF due to a high MYH of maize in 2016 (7211 m3N CH4 ha−1). The MYH of miscanthus in MUM was significantly lower compared to REF in 2016 and 2017 due to a lower DMY. Earlier maturation of miscanthus in MUM caused higher ash and lignin contents compared with REF. However, the mean substrate-specific methane yield of miscanthus was similar across the treatments (281.2 and 276.2 lN kg−1 volatile solid−1). Non-significant differences in MYH 2018 (1624 and 1957 m3N CH4 ha−1) and in DMY 2019 (15.6 and 21.7 Mg ha−1) between MUM and REF indicate, that MUM recovered from biotic and abiotic stress during 2016. Consequently, MUM could be a promising approach to close the methane yield gap of miscanthus cultivation in the first year of establishment.
Keywords: biogas; biomass; cropping system; establishment; intercropping; low-input; maize; miscanthus; methane yield; perennial crop biogas; biomass; cropping system; establishment; intercropping; low-input; maize; miscanthus; methane yield; perennial crop
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

von Cossel, M.; Mangold, A.; Iqbal, Y.; Lewandowski, I. Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.). Energies 2019, 12, 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244680

AMA Style

von Cossel M, Mangold A, Iqbal Y, Lewandowski I. Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.). Energies. 2019; 12(24):4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244680

Chicago/Turabian Style

von Cossel, Moritz, Anja Mangold, Yasir Iqbal, and Iris Lewandowski. 2019. "Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.)" Energies 12, no. 24: 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244680

APA Style

von Cossel, M., Mangold, A., Iqbal, Y., & Lewandowski, I. (2019). Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.). Energies, 12(24), 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop