Next Article in Journal
Performance of Indocyanine Green Compared to 99mTc-Nanocolloids for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Early Vulvar Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Poor Muscle Status, Dietary Protein Intake, Exercise Levels, Quality of Life and Physical Function in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer at Chemotherapy Commencement and during Follow-Up
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Lung Cancer Patients’ Use of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Overall Survival: Real-World Evidence from Quebec, Canada
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dietary Habits Are Related to Phase Angle in Male Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(11), 8074-8083; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29110637
by Paraskevi Detopoulou 1,2, Theodora Tsiouda 3, Maria Pilikidou 4, Foteini Palyvou 4, Maria Mantzorou 5, Persefoni Perzirkianidou 3, Krystallia Kyrka 3, Spyridon Methenitis 4,6,7, Foivi S. Kondyli 4, Gavriela Voulgaridou 4, Paul Zarogoulidis 8,9,*, Dimitris Matthaios 10, Rena Oikonomidou 11, Maria Romanidou 12, Dimitrios Giannakidis 13 and Sousana K. Papadopoulou 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(11), 8074-8083; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29110637
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 18 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Assessment and Management of Cancer Patients)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is my pleasure to help review the manuscrpt. I have some comments and suggestions for authors.

 

They had a good outcome in the ideas they wanted to convey, subject domain, appropriate statistical methodsused and the way of presenting the results was fine, although they can improved and it could also be presented in graphic form so that the results can be more visible

 

For suggestions I might said that in the discussion part comment that they do not have data on segmental PhA measurements but that by comparing several measurements they manage to make a predictor of malnutrition. I would suggest that having the data from the various past measurementsmention the parameters or phase angle cut-offs that were used so the results can have more importance than the one that already haves.

 

Author Response

Reviewer #1

It is my pleasure to help review the manuscript. I have some comments and suggestions for authors.

 

They had a good outcome in the ideas they wanted to convey, subject domain, appropriate statistical methodsused and the way of presenting the results was fine, although they can improved and it could also be presented in graphic form so that the results can be more visible. 

 

For suggestions I might said that in the discussion part comment that they do not have data on segmental PhA measurements but that by comparing several measurements they manage to make a predictor of malnutrition. I would suggest that having the data from the various past measurements, mention the parameters or phase angle cut-offs that were used so the results can have more importance than the one that already haves.

 

We would like to thank the Reviewer for the comments.

We have added a figure (Figure 1) to depict factor loadings and we have kept Table 3 as supplementary information (Supplementary Table 1).

Unfortunately, the authors do not have previous phase angle measurements for these patients.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

I do not see the corresponding author in the list of authors

methods

- why were only men included in the research? please write why women were not included, what is the significance of this for the study.

Were the patients tested on the BIA without socks? They had bare feet?

is there a scientific source for the phase angle equation? please specify

Table 1 - please indicate which result is the mean and which is the median. Weaving the same SD and 25th-75th

page 6 is almost blank ... please correct it.

Table 3 - what are the results in bold for?

line 187: The word "table 5" without bold

citations should be before the period. It's not good.

Missing: "Author Contributions: "

the references repeats itself. It cannot be like that ... One references is longer, the other is shorter. I guess the correct references is shorter ....

Please correct the references in accordance with the journal's guidelines.

Please standardize the font and its size in accordance with the journal's guidelines.

Author Response

Reviewer #2

 

- why were only men included in the research? please write why women were not included, what is the significance of this for the study.

The present study included only men. Sex- disparities have been documented in lung cancer incidence and sex may also influence treatment outcomes (such as in the case of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitors). Moreover, there are sex-related body composition and PhA differences and possibly sex differences in diet related behaviors. In this context, the sole inclusion of men can better reflect the net associations of diet with the PhA. This point was added at the Discussion with the appropriate references.

Were the patients tested on the BIA without socks? They had bare feet?

Yes, this condition is necessary for the BIA measurement. This point was added at the Methodology

is there a scientific source for the phase angle equation? please specify

Table 1 - please indicate which result is the mean and which is the median. Weaving the same SD and 25th-75th

Table 1 was accordingly updated

page 6 is almost blank ... please correct it.

Done

Table 3 - what are the results in bold for?

Numbers in bold indicate absolute loadings greater than 0.5, which correspond to a specific component.

line 187: The word "table 5" without bold

Done

citations should be before the period. It's not good.

We have updated the manuscript accordingly.

Missing: "Author Contributions: "

We have added this section.

the references repeats itself. It cannot be like that ... e references is longer, the other is shorter. I guess the correct references is shorter ....

We have updated the references list.

Please correct the references in accordance with the journal's guidelines.

Done

Please standardize the font and its size in accordance with the journal's guidelines.

Done

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop