Next Article in Journal
Successful Follow-Up Twenty Years After Heart Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Angio-SealTM Vascular Closure Device: An Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness
 
 
Cardiovascular Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Editores Medicorum Helveticorum (EMH).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Cannabinoids for Therapeutic Use in Atherosclerosis †

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Foundation for Medical Researches, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Die Autorin dieses Beitrages hat den «Cardiovascular Biology Prize 2005» gewonnen, siehe «Mitteilungen der Fachgesellschaften», Seite 284 dieses Heftes.
Cardiovasc. Med. 2006, 9(7), 268; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2006.01188
Submission received: 30 May 2006 / Revised: 30 June 2006 / Accepted: 30 July 2006 / Published: 30 August 2006

Summary

Atherosclerosis remains the primary cause of heart disease and stroke that causes about 50% of all deaths in Western countries. The identification of promising novel anti-atherosclerotic therapeutics is therefore of great interest and represents a continued challenge to the medical community. Cannabinoids, such as D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the major psychoactive compound of marijuana, their synthetic analogs and endogenous cannabinoid ligands, produce their biological effects by interacting with specific receptors. In a mouse model of atherosclerosis, we have recently shown that THC inhibits disease progression through pleiotropic effects on inflammatory cells. Blocking of cannabinoid receptor CB2, the main cannabinoid receptor expressed on immune cells, abolished the observed effects. The potential therapeutic benefit is in conflict with the known health risks of marijuana use, as THC also binds to and activates neuronal CB1 cannabinoid receptors. Besides its well known neurobehavioral effects, THC also mediates cardiovascular effects such as vasodilation and hypotension. The development of novel cannabinoid receptor ligands that selectively target CB2 receptors and are devoid of adverse effects might overcome this problem. In addition, pharmacological modulation of the endocannabinoid system might also offer a new therapeutic strategy in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Several reports demonstrating an implication of the endocannabinoid system in different inflammatory conditions support this hypothesis.

Zusammenfassung

  • Atherosklerose (Arteriosklerose) stellt nach wie vor die Hauptursache für Herzerkrankungen und Schlaganfall dar und ist für etwa 50% aller Todesfälle in der westlichen Gesellschaft verantwortlich. Ein grosses Interesse für die Medizin besteht daher in der Entwicklung neuer anti-atherosklerotischer Therapien.
  • Cannabinoide, wie zum Beispiel die in Marijuana hauptsächlich enthaltene psychaktive Substanz D9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), erzielen ihre biologische Wirkung durch Interaktion mit spezifischen Rezeptoren. Im Mausmodel konnten wir kürzlich zeigen, dass THC das Fortschreiten der Atherosklerose mittels vielseitiger Effekte auf inflammatorische Zellen verlangsamt. Durch Blockierung des vorwiegend auf Immunzellen vorhandenen Cannabinoid-Rezeptors CB2 wurden all diese Effekte verhindert. Der potentielle therapeutische Nutzen steht im Konflikt mit dem bekannten Gesundheitsrisiko, welches mit dem Konsum von Marijuana verbunden ist. Denn es ist bekannt, dass THC auch an den neuronalen Cannabinoid-Rezeptor CB1 bindet und somit aktiviert. Neben den bekannten bewusstseinsverändernden Auswirkungen verursacht THC auch kardiovaskuläre Effekte wie Vasodilatation und Hypotension. Die Entwicklung neuer Cannabinoid-Rezeptor-Liganden ohne die ungewünschten Nebenwirkungen könnte helfen, dieses Problem zu überwinden. Zudem könnte die pharmakologische Manipulation des Endocannabinoidsystems eine neue Therapiestrategie zur Behandlung von Atherosklerose darstellen. Verschiedene Studien, welche auf eine Beteiligung des Endocannabinoidsystems in verschiedenen inflammatorischen Situationen hinweisen, unterstützen diese Hypothese.
  •  
  • Schlüsselwörter: Atherosclerosis; chronische Entzündung, Cannabinoide

Introduction

The discovery of membrane receptors that bind the psychoactive compound of marijuana, D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and their endogenous ligands has led to the description of the endocannabinoid system [1,2,3,4,5]. Within the last years, a whole signaling system has been identified, composed of the two known receptors, endogenous ligands and enzymes for ligand biosynthesis and inactivation [6]. All endocannabinoids identified so far are derivatives of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and exhibit varying selectivity for the two cannabinoid receptors [7]. In the past few years, many different regulatory actions have been attributed to endocannabinoids, and their involvement in several pathophysiological conditions is subject of ongoing investigations. Consequently, the endocannabinoid system represents an attractive target for drug developing pharmaceutical companies.

Cannabinoid receptors

Both cannabinoid receptors are G protein-coupled receptors that modulate second messengers and signaling components such as adenylate cyclase [8], mitogen-activated protein kinases [9] or members of the NF-kB family [10,11]. The tissue distribution of the two receptors is likely to account for the well-known psychotropic and peripheral effects of THC. Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is expressed predominantly in the central and peripheral nervous system, while cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) is present on immune cells [12]. Thus, CB2 receptors may have physiological importance in immune response, inflammation and chronic pain [13]. So far, the presence and function of CB2 receptors in central nervous system (CNS) neurons were controversial. However, a recent study demonstrates the expression of functional CB2 receptors on brainstem neurons [14]. Substantial evidence further suggests the presence of the endocannabinoid system in liver, pancreas and adipocyte tissue, indicating its regulatory role in metabolic functions [15,16,17,18,19,20]. A recent study demonstrating endocannabinoid signaling in gingival tissue and receptor upregulation in response to inflammatory stimulation further indicates a modulatory function of the endocannabinoid system in periodontal inflammation [21]. In addition, CB2 receptors have been implicated in bone mass regulation [22,23,24].
Moreover, there is emerging evidence suggesting that some cannabinoid effects are not mediated by either CB1 or CB2 receptors, which implicates additional receptors involved in these actions [25]. These include the transient receptor potential channels of type V1 (TRPV1), also known as vanilloid VR1 receptors [26] as well as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma [27,28].
The fact that CB1 and CB2 are differentially expressed depending on the cell differentiation and activation status may represent a major mechanism by which the endocannabinoid system is involved in immune functions. Indeed, stimuli such as phytohemagglutinin (PHA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), cytokines or mitogenic antibodies have been reported to regulate the expression of CB1 and CB2 [13].

Cannabinoids and immunomodulation

The development of selective agonists, antagonists, and transgenic mice lacking CB1 and CB2 receptors has contributed to broaden our current understanding of cannabinoid biology. As a consequence, the capacity of cannabinoids to regulate immune function is now well established. In vitro, THC treatment of human immune cells inhibits secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and triggers the differentiation into a Th2 phenotype [29,30]. As demonstrated, a CB2-specific antagonist abrogates the majority of these immunomodulatory effects [30]. Moreover, THCmediated inhibition of T helper cell activation is absent in CB2-deficient mice, supporting the hypothesis that the immunomodulatory effects of cannabinoids are CB2-dependent [31].
Cannabidiol, the major non-psychotropic constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has been reported to ameliorate chronic inflammation in murine collagen-induced arthritis, a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis, by inhibiting antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation and IFN-g secretion [32]. Several reports described beneficial effects of cannabinoids in experimental animal models of multiple sclerosis. These effects not only affected tonic control of spasticity, but also inflammatory responses in the spinal cord [33,34]. Interestingly, two studies employing selective inhibitors of endocannabinoid cellular uptake demonstrated improved motor function and diminished inflammatory responses in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis [35,36]. By preventing the uptake and thus degradation of endocannabinoids, the inhibitors enhance their half-life in vivo. In both studies, the authors observed a decreased expression of major histocompability complex (MHC) class II antigen, nitric oxide synthase and proinflammatory cytokine expression.

Effects of THC on atherosclerosis

Encouraged by the vast number of studies demonstrating immunomodulatory properties of cannabinoids, we recently tested the antiatherosclerotic potential of THC in a murine model [37]. In our study, we used the apolipoprotein E knock out (ApoE–/–) mouse model. These mice rapidly develop hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic lesions when fed at high cholesterol diet for only a few weeks. We found that THC inhibited progression of established atherosclerotic lesions (Figure 1). This was associated with reduced proliferation and IFN-g secretion of lymphoid cells as well as reduced macrophage infiltration into atherosclerotic lesions. Moreover, we detected CB2 receptor expression within human and mouse atherosclerotic lesions (Figure 2). In vitro, we observed that THC inhibited macrophage chemotaxis in response to MCP-1 and reduced expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2. Importantly, these effects were blocked by a specific CB2 receptor antagonist [38]. It is particularly noteworthy that the observed in vitro and in vivo effects of THC were dose-dependent. The dose dependency showed a U-shaped curve, where both higher and lower doses were inactive. The effective dose was lower than the dose usually associated with psychotropic effects of THC. However, it is difficult to translate our findings obtained in the used apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE–/–) mouse model of atherosclerosis to humans. We found very low nanomolar concentrations in blood serum of THC-treated mice, which might be a consequence of local THC storage within fat tissue, as cannabinoids are known to be very lipophilic. Indeed, several animal experiments have demonstrated that the instant uptake and unlimited storage of THC by neutral fat limits the molecular concentration of the drug present in plasma [39,40,41]. The hypercholesterolemic ApoE–/– mouse model is characterised by a strong accumulation of fat tissue, especially within the vessel wall. Thus, THC might be stored within atherosclerotic lesions, resulting in high local concentrations at inflammatory sites. Additional experiments are warranted to clarify whether local accumulation of THC contributes to the anti-atherosclerotic effect, and whether similar THC concentrations may be effective in humans.

Potential role of endocannabinoids in atherosclerosis

Today, it remains unclear whether receptor signaling via endocannabinoids plays a modulatory role in chronic inflammation ongoing during atherogenesis. Several reports demonstrating an implication of the endocannabinoid system in different inflammatory conditions support this hypothesis. For example, a recent study demonstrates that CB1 receptors mediate intrinsic protective signals that counteract proinflammatory responses in a mouse model of colonic inflammation [42]. A different report provides evidence for the involvement of CB2 receptor signaling in cutaneous inflammation [43]. Furthermore, endocannabinoid signaling has been implicated in periodontal inflammation, as both cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 were upregulated under pathological conditions [21]. Finally, two studies have shown that pharmacological modulation of the endocannabinoid system to increase the half-life of endocannabinoids might have a therapeutic potential for the treatment of multiple sclerosis [35,36].
To clarify the role of the endocannabinoid system during atherosclerosis, additional studies employing selective CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists or cannabinoid receptor deficient mice are warranted.

Cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids

Although cannabinoids may be of therapeutic use for the treatment of atherosclerosis, these effects are in conflict with the known adverse effects associated with marijuana consumption. Indeed, the bioactive constituents of the marijuana plant and their synthetic and endogenous analogs cause not only neurobehavioral, but also cardiovascular effects such as vasodilation and hypotension [44,45,46,47]. However, targeting the endocannabinoid system may also offer novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of hypertension [48]. Recently published clinical trial reports to test the effectiveness of the CB1 receptor blocker rimonabant as an antiobesity drug have shown that it also had a significant effect on lipid parameters and several other cardiovascular risk factors [49,50].
Underlying mechanisms of the cardiovascular cannabinoid actions may involve not only activation of cannabinoid receptors on peripheral nerves, but also signaling via receptors located in the vascular wall [45]. The presence of CB1 receptors on vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells as well as experiments performed with isolated arteries provide evidence for this hypothesis [44,51,52,53].

Non-psychoactive cannabinoid receptor ligands for therapeutic use

Besides the risk of unwanted cardiovascular effects, a broad acceptance of cannabinoids as therapeutic agents is hampered by the fact that they exhibit psychotropic effects. Therefore, particular research interest is focusing on the development and characterisation of either synthetic or plant derived cannabinoids with therapeutic value that are non-psychotropic [54]. Several non-psychotroptic synthetic cannabinoids with anti-inflammatory properties have recently been developed from plant cannabinoids. Their anti-inflammatory properties suggest that CB2 ligands may serve as novel immunomodulatory agents in the treatment of immune disorders such as atherosclerosis. However, little is known about the molecular mode of action of these compounds and requires further investigation.

Conclusion

A growing body of evidence suggests a broad therapeutic potential of cannabinoids for a variety of conditions. Nevertheless, the medical use has been very limited in the past, mainly due to the psychotropic effects associated with marijuana use. Now that non-psychoactive cannabinoids become available, it is essential to investigate in more detail the pharmacological and biological activities of these drugs to identify the most powerful and selective agents for therapeutic use. In particular, several newly described synthetic CB2 ligands with immunomodulatory properties may serve as novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of immune disorders such as atherosclerosis. The recent demonstration that THC mediates anti-atherosclerotic effects in a mouse model via CB2 receptor-dependent mechanisms suggests that CB2 activation may attenuate atherosclerosis progression.

References

  1. Matsuda, L.A.; Lolait, S.J.; Brownstein, M.J.; Young, A.C.; Bonner, T.I. Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature 1990, 346, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Munro, S.; Thomas, K.L.; Abu-Shaar, M. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature 1993, 365, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Devane, W.A.; Hanus, L.; Breuer, A.; Pertwee, R.G.; Stevenson, L.A.; Griffin, G.; et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 1992, 258, 1946–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mechoulam, R.; Ben-Shabat, S.; Hanus, L.; Ligumsky, M.; Kaminski, N.E.; Schatz, A.R.; et al. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 1995, 50, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sugiura, T.; Kondo, S.; Sukagawa, A.; Nakane, S.; Shinoda, A.; Itoh, K.; et al. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995, 215, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Petrocellis, L.; Cascio, M.G.; Di Marzo, V. The endocannabinoid system: a general view and latest additions. Br J Pharmacol 2004, 141, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McAllister, S.D.; Glass, M. CB(1) and CB(2) receptor-mediated signalling: a focus on endocannabinoids. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2002, 66, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Howlett, A.C.; Johnson, M.R.; Melvin, L.S.; Milne, G.M. Nonclassical cannabinoid analgetics inhibit adenylate cyclase: development of a cannabinoid receptor model. Mol Pharmacol 1988, 33, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bouaboula, M.; Poinot-Chazel, C.; Marchand, J.; Canat, X.; Bourrie, B.; Rinaldi-Carmona, M.; et al. Signaling pathway associated with stimulation of CB2 peripheral cannabinoid receptor. Involvement of both mitogen-activated protein kinase and induction of Krox-24 expression. Eur J Biochem 1996, 237, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Daaka, Y.; Zhu, W.; Friedman, H.; Klein, T.W. Induction of interleukin-2 receptor alpha gene by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol is mediated by nuclear factor kappaB and CB1 cannabinoid receptor. DNA Cell Biol 1997, 16, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeon, Y.J.; Yang, K.H.; Pulaski, J.T.; Kaminski, N.E. Attenuation of inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol is mediated through the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B/Rel activation. Mol Pharmacol 1996, 50, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lutz, B. Molecular biology of cannabinoid receptors. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2002, 66, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Klein, T.W.; Newton, C.; Larsen, K.; Lu, L.; Perkins, I.; Nong, L.; et al. The cannabinoid system and immune modulation. J Leukoc Biol 2003, 74, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Sickle, M.D.; Duncan, M.; Kingsley, P.J.; Mouihate, A.; Urbani, P.; Mackie, K.; et al. Identification and functional characterization of brainstem cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Science 2005, 310, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Batkai, S.; Jarai, Z.; Wagner, J.A.; Goparaju, S.K.; Varga, K.; Liu, J.; et al. Endocannabinoids acting at vascular CB1 receptors mediate the vasodilated state in advanced liver cirrhosis. Nat Med 2001, 7, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bensaid, M.; Gary-Bobo, M.; Esclangon, A.; Maffrand, J.P.; Le Fur, G.; Oury-Donat, F.; et al. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 increases Acrp30 mRNA expression in adipose tissue of obese fa/fa rats and in cultured adipocyte cells. Mol Pharmacol 2003, 63, 908–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Osei-Hyiaman, D.; DePetrillo, M.; Pacher, P.; Liu, J.; Radaeva, S.; Batkai, S.; et al. Endocannabinoid activation at hepatic CB1 receptors stimulates fatty acid synthesis and contributes to diet-induced obesity. J Clin Invest 2005, 115, 1298–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roche, R.; Hoareau, L.; Bes-Houtmann, S.; Gonthier, M.P.; Laborde, C.; Baron, J.F.; et al. Presence of the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, in human omental and subcutaneous adipocytes. Histochem Cell Biol, Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006; 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cota, D.; Marsicano, G.; Tschop, M.; Grubler, Y.; Flachskamm, C.; Schubert, M.; et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system affects energy balance via central orexigenic drive and peripheral lipogenesis. J Clin Invest 2003, 112, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Juan-Pico, P.; Fuentes, E.; Javier Bermudez-Silva, F.; Javier Diaz-Molina, F.; Ripoll, C.; Rodriguez de Fonseca, F.; et al. Cannabinoid receptors regulate Ca(2+) signals and insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cell. Cell Calcium 2006, 39, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nakajima, Y.; Furuichi, Y.; Biswas, K.K.; Hashiguchi, T.; Kawahara, K.; Yamaji, K.; et al. Endocannabinoid, anandamide in gingival tissue regulates the periodontal inflammation through NF-kappaB pathway inhibition. FEBS Lett 2006, 580, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Idris, A.I.; van ‘t Hof, R.J.; Greig, I.R.; Ridge, S.A.; Baker, D.; Ross, R.A.; et al. Regulation of bone mass, bone loss and osteoclast activity by cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med 2005, 11, 774–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Karsak, M.; Cohen-Solal, M.; Freudenberg, J.; Ostertag, A.; Morieux, C.; Kornak, U.; et al. Cannabinoid receptor type 2 gene is associated with human osteoporosis. Hum Mol Genet 2005, 14, 3389–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ofek, O.; Karsak, M.; Leclerc, N.; Fogel, M.; Frenkel, B.; Wright, K.; et al. Peripheral cannabinoid receptor, CB2, regulates bone mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Begg, M.; Pacher, P.; Batkai, S.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Offertaler, L.; Mo, F.M.; et al. Evidence for novel cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol Ther 2005, 106, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zygmunt, P.M.; Petersson, J.; Andersson, D.A.; Chuang, H.; Sorgard, M.; Di Marzo, V.; et al. Vanilloid receptors on sensory nerves mediate the vasodilator action of anandamide. Nature 1999, 400, 452–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Burstein, S. PPAR-gamma: a nuclear receptor with affinity for cannabinoids. Life Sci 2005, 77, 1674–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’Sullivan, S.E.; Tarling, E.J.; Bennett, A.J.; Kendall, D.A.; Randall, M.D. Novel time-dependent vascular actions of Delta 9tetrahydrocannabinol mediated by peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor gamma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 337, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srivastava, M.D.; Srivastava, B.I.; Brouhard, B. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alter cytokine production by human immune cells. Immunopharmacology 1998, 40, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, M.; Kiertscher, S.M.; Cheng, Q.; Zoumalan, R.; Tashkin, D.P.; Roth, M.D. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol regulates Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in activated human T cells. J Neuroimmunol 2002, 133, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buckley, N.E.; McCoy, K.L.; Mezey, E.; Bonner, T.; Zimmer, A.; Felder, C.C.; et al. Immunomodulation by cannabinoids is absent in mice deficient for the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 2000, 396, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Malfait, A.M.; Gallily, R.; Sumariwalla, P.F.; Malik, A.S.; Andreakos, E.; Mechoulam, R.; et al. The nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol is an oral anti-arthritic therapeutic in murine collagen-induced arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97, 9561–9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Croxford, J.L.; Miller, S.D. Immunoregulation of a viral model of multiple sclerosis using the synthetic cannabinoid R+WIN55,212. J Clin Invest 2003, 111, 1231–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Arevalo-Martin, A.; Vela, J.M.; Molina-Holgado, E.; Borrell, J.; Guaza, C. Therapeutic action of cannabinoids in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci 2003, 23, 2511–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mestre, L.; Correa, F.; Arevalo-Martin, A.; Molina-Holgado, E.; Valenti, M.; Ortar, G.; et al. Pharmacological modulation of the endocannabinoid system in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurochem 2005, 92, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ortega-Gutierrez, S.; Molina-Holgado, E.; Arevalo-Martin, A.; Correa, F.; Viso, A.; Lopez-Rodriguez, M.L.; et al. Activation of the endocannabinoid system as therapeutic approach in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. Faseb J 2005, 19, 1338–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Steffens, S.; Veillard, N.R.; Arnaud, C.; Pelli, G.; Burger, F.; Staub, C.; et al. Low dose oral cannabinoid therapy reduces progression of atherosclerosis in mice. Nature 2005, 434, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rinaldi-Carmona, M.; Barth, F.; Millan, J.; Derocq, J.M.; Casellas, P.; Congy, C.; et al. SR 144528, the first potent and selective antagonist of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998, 284, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McGilveray, I.J. Pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids. Pain Res Manag 2005, 10, 15A–22A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nahas, G.; Leger, C.; Tocque, B.; Hoellinger, H. The kinetics of cannabinoid distribution and storage with special reference to the brain and testis. J Clin Pharmacol 1981, 21, 208S–214S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nahas, G.G. The pharmacokinetics of THC in fat and brain: resulting functional responses to marihuana smoking. Hum Psychopharmacol 2001, 16, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Massa, F.; Marsicano, G.; Hermann, H.; Cannich, A.; Monory, K.; Cravatt, B.F.; et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system protects against colonic inflammation. J Clin Invest 2004, 113, 1202–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ueda, Y.; Miyagawa, N.; Matsui, T.; Kaya, T.; Iwamura, H. Involvement of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor-mediated response and efficacy of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor inverse agonist, JTE-907, in cutaneous inflammation in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 2005, 520, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Randall, M.D.; Kendall, D.A.; O’Sullivan, S. The complexities of the cardiovascular actions of cannabinoids. Br J Pharmacol 2004, 142, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hillard, C.J. Endocannabinoids and vascular function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000, 294, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kunos, G.; Jarai, Z.; Batkai, S.; Goparaju, S.K.; Ishac, E.J.; Liu, J.; et al. Endocannabinoids as cardiovascular modulators. Chem Phys Lipids 2000, 108, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pacher, P.; Batkai, S.; Kunos, G. Blood pressure regulation by endocannabinoids and their receptors. Neuropharmacology 2005, 48, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Batkai, S.; Pacher, P.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Radaeva, S.; Liu, J.; Harvey-White, J.; et al. Endocannabinoids acting at cannabinoid1 receptors regulate cardiovascular function in hypertension. Circulation 2004, 110, 1996–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Van Gaal, L.F.; Rissanen, A.M.; Scheen, A.J.; Ziegler, O; Rossner, S. Effects of the cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker rimonabant on weight reduction and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients: 1-year experience from the RIO-Europe study. Lancet 2005, 365, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. S. Effects of the cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker rimonabant on weight reduction and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients: 1-year experience from the RIO-Europe study. Lancet 2005, 365, 1389–1397. [CrossRef]
  51. Despres, J.P.; Golay, A.; Sjostrom, L. Effects of rimonabant on metabolic risk factors in overweight patients with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med 2005, 353, 2121–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gebremedhin, D.; Lange, A.R.; Campbell, W.B.; Hillard, C.J.; Harder, D.R. Cannabinoid CB1 receptor of cat cerebral arterial muscle functions to inhibit L-type Ca2+ channel current. Am J Physiol 2085, 276, H2085–H2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, J.; Gao, B.; Mirshahi, F.; Sanyal, A.J.; Khanolkar, A.D.; Makriyannis, A.; et al. Functional CB1 cannabinoid receptors in human vascular endothelial cells. Biochem J 2000, 346 Pt 3, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sugiura, T.; Kodaka, T.; Nakane, S.; Kishimoto, S.; Kondo, S.; Waku, K. Detection of an endogenous cannabimimetic molecule, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, and cannabinoid CB1 receptor mRNA in human vascular cells: is 2-arachidonoylglycerol a possible vasomodulator? Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998, 243, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Klein, T.W. Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol 2005, 5, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reduced atherosclerotic plaque development and macrophage content in THC-treated apoE–/– mice. Representative cryosections of mouse aortic roots, stained for lipid deposition by Sudan IV, and quantification of atherosclerotic lesions. After 5 weeks of feeding with a high cholesterol diet, apoE–/– mice developed atherosclerotic lesions (n = 5). THC (1 mg kg–1) was orally administered during the last 6 weeks of the 11 week diet group (n = 6 for THC and n = 8 for controls). Data represent mean values ± SEM. * p <0.05 vs apoE–/– 5 weeks; ** p <0.05 vs apoE–/– 11 weeks without THC.
Figure 1. Reduced atherosclerotic plaque development and macrophage content in THC-treated apoE–/– mice. Representative cryosections of mouse aortic roots, stained for lipid deposition by Sudan IV, and quantification of atherosclerotic lesions. After 5 weeks of feeding with a high cholesterol diet, apoE–/– mice developed atherosclerotic lesions (n = 5). THC (1 mg kg–1) was orally administered during the last 6 weeks of the 11 week diet group (n = 6 for THC and n = 8 for controls). Data represent mean values ± SEM. * p <0.05 vs apoE–/– 5 weeks; ** p <0.05 vs apoE–/– 11 weeks without THC.
Cardiovascmed 09 00268 g001
Figure 2. The cannabinoid receptor CB2 is expressed in human and mouse atherosclerotic plaques. Representative cryosections of human coronary atherosclerotic lesion (A), normal carotid artery from wild-type mouse (B), aortic arch atherosclerotic lesion from apoE–/– mouse (C, D), aortic root atherosclerotic lesion from apoE–/– mouse (E, F). Sections were immunolabeled with an anti-CB2 receptor antibody (A, B, C, E), or with secondary antibody only (D, F).
Figure 2. The cannabinoid receptor CB2 is expressed in human and mouse atherosclerotic plaques. Representative cryosections of human coronary atherosclerotic lesion (A), normal carotid artery from wild-type mouse (B), aortic arch atherosclerotic lesion from apoE–/– mouse (C, D), aortic root atherosclerotic lesion from apoE–/– mouse (E, F). Sections were immunolabeled with an anti-CB2 receptor antibody (A, B, C, E), or with secondary antibody only (D, F).
Cardiovascmed 09 00268 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Steffens, S. Cannabinoids for Therapeutic Use in Atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Med. 2006, 9, 268. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2006.01188

AMA Style

Steffens S. Cannabinoids for Therapeutic Use in Atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2006; 9(7):268. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2006.01188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Steffens, Sabine. 2006. "Cannabinoids for Therapeutic Use in Atherosclerosis" Cardiovascular Medicine 9, no. 7: 268. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2006.01188

APA Style

Steffens, S. (2006). Cannabinoids for Therapeutic Use in Atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular Medicine, 9(7), 268. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2006.01188

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop