Next Article in Journal
Impact of Fulvic Acid and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidan Inoculum Amount on the Formation of Secondary Iron Minerals
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Contextual Factors in Shaping Urban Older Adults’ Intention of Institutional Care in China: A Mixed-Methods Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Coal Mining on Historical Buildings: Case Study in Shanxi
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation of Unsafe Acts Influence Law Based on System Dynamics Simulation: Thoughts on Behavior Mechanism and Safety Control

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4733; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064733
by Xuecai Xie 1,2,3, Jun Hu 4,5,*, Gui Fu 3, Xueming Shu 1,2, Yali Wu 3, Lida Huang 1,2 and Shifei Shen 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4733; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064733
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 March 2023 / Published: 8 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript adopted a system dynamics method to study the influence of enterprise safety culture, safety management system and individual safety ability on the individual safety acts. The paper is interesting, with many simulation images and concepts. However several issues should be solved before it can be accepted. 

1. English text needs to be improved and further editing is necessary.

2. The conclusions and abstract are not quantitative. The authors should explore more data from Figure 3 to Figure11.

3. Page 5. The equations are very non-standard. Authors need to pay attention to superscript and subscript. And the difference between * and × needs to be unified.

4.How to verify the effectiveness of your system dynamics model?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Despite being a very interesting theme, it loses interest by focusing on a specific area and not using, for example, a comparison of the different existing references.

 

The structure of the article is a little confusing in terms of content because there is no distinction of information between the different chapters. It is written not focused on a scientific paper but as a thesis.

You can find the suggestions along the document.

I would suggest a revision of the whole document before re-submission.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper presents significant improvements in its structure and presentation of content.  I leave only for their consideration improvements in the points indicated in the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop