Next Article in Journal
Prevalence and Correlates of Likely Major Depressive Disorder among Medical Students in Alberta, Canada
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between Cyber-Ostracism and Adolescents’ Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Mediating Roles of Depression and Experiential Avoidance
Previous Article in Journal
Valuing Human Impact of Natural Disasters: A Review of Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Mortality Salience, Negative Emotions and Cultural Values on Suicidal Ideation in COVID-19: A Conditional Process Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Exploring the Suicide Mechanism Path of High-Suicide-Risk Adolescents—Based on Weibo Text Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11495; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811495
by Liuling Mo 1,2, He Li 1,2 and Tingshao Zhu 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11495; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811495
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Suicide and Self-Harm Behavior on the Internet)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks for sending the paper. I am not sure what the authors attempted in this paper. What I understand is that they applied the suicide pathways based on Weibo text analysis. The paper revealed already stabilized facts from previous studies. I strongly oppose the process of assigning psychiatric diagnoses based on  Weibo text analysis.  Finally, it stands that the paper revealed already known factors with questionable methods. I may suggest that authors may consider contrasting the facts between Weibo data and clinical diagnoses. 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made a thorough review according to my suggestions. Two points were adequately addressed despite they were not exactly as I suggested, as good as possible.

I now recommend publication in its present form.

Sincerely,

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks

Back to TopTop