Next Article in Journal
How Can One Strengthen a Tiered Healthcare System through Health System Reform? Lessons Learnt from Beijing, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Hospital Bed Shortages on the Containment of COVID-19 in Wuhan
Previous Article in Journal
Comorbidity in Older Patients Hospitalized with Cancer in Northeast China based on Hospital Discharge Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring How Media Influence Preventive Behavior and Excessive Preventive Intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 21
10.3390/ijerph17218039
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Related Factors and Association with Perceived Social Support

by
Wei-Po Chou
1,2,
Peng-Wei Wang
1,2,
Shiou-Lan Chen
1,
Yu-Ping Chang
3,
Chia-Fen Wu
1,
Wei-Hsin Lu
4,* and
Cheng-Fang Yen
1,2,*
1
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
2
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
3
School of Nursing, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, New York, NY 14214-3079, USA
4
Department of Psychiatry, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City 60002, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(21), 8039; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218039
Submission received: 1 October 2020 / Revised: 26 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of COVID-19 on Public Health, Social Science, and Human Behaviors)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to determine the proportion of individuals who voluntarily reduced interaction with their family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates to avoid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and the associations of reduced social interaction with perceived social support during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Moreover, the related factors of voluntary reduction of social interaction were examined. We recruited participants via a Facebook advertisement. We determined the reduced social interaction, perceived social support, cognitive and affective constructs of health belief and demographic characteristics among 1954 respondents (1305 women and 649 men; mean age: 37.9 years with standard deviation 10.8 years). In total, 38.1% of respondents voluntarily reduced their social interaction with friends to avoid COVID-19 infection, 36.1% voluntarily reduced their interaction with colleagues or classmates, and 11.1% voluntarily reduced interaction with family members. Respondents who voluntarily reduced interaction with other people reported lower perceived social support than those who did not voluntarily reduce interaction. Respondents who were older and had a higher level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19 were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates to avoid COVID-19 infection than respondents who were younger and had a lower level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19, respectively. The present study revealed that despite strict social distancing measures not being implemented in Taiwan, more than one-third of respondents voluntarily reduced their interaction with friends and colleagues or classmates. The general public should be encouraged to maintain social contacts through appropriately distanced in-person visits and telecommunication.

1. Introduction

1.1. Reduction of Social Interaction and Social Support during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had an enormous impact on numerous dimensions of human lives, including health [1,2,3], work [4], education [5], leisure activities [6], and economic action [7]. The change in social interaction is an especially obvious and far-reaching effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study in 25 European countries revealed that higher perceived sociability among respondents was a predictor of higher COVID-19 mortality in their countries [8]. COVID-19 is highly contagious [9], which has forced governments worldwide to implement policies to reduce the spread of the infection, such as quarantine, lockdown, closure of nonessential stores and educational institutions, and border closure [10]. However, fewer regulation policies are implemented in the regions where the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are less severe. In situations where social distancing mostly remains voluntary, the public may choose to reduce the frequency of social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Studies have revealed that although social distancing mitigates the spread of respiratory infectious diseases [11], it may increase the possibility of social isolation, which increases the risk of morbidity and mortality [12]. Research has indicated that social distancing and isolation from social networks were associated with negative mental health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic [13,14]. Reduced social support has been proposed as a mediator of the association of social distancing with negative mental health outcomes. Social support refers to the access of an individual to support through social ties to other individuals, groups, and the larger community [15]. Studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic have revealed that a higher level of perceived social support was associated with fewer COVID-19-related worries in the general public [16] and fewer acute stress disorder symptoms among college students [17]. A study in medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that a higher level of social support was positively associated with self-efficacy and higher sleep quality and negatively associated with the degree of anxiety and stress [18,19]. Social support was also crucial in the retention in care of older people with human immunodeficiency virus infection and substance use disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic [20]. These results support that perceived social support is a critical protector of the mental health of individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the effects of voluntarily reducing the frequency of social interaction on the level of perceived social support in the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic warrant further study. The results of the study may assist in the development of strategies that would provide the necessary social connections [21].

1.2. Factors Related to the Reduction of Social Interaction

The Health Belief Model (HBM) indicates that worry regarding falling ill is a health belief construct that predicts individuals’ engagement in health-related behaviors [22,23]. A study reported that individuals who perceived a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 were more likely to adopt social distancing behaviors [24]. Worry regarding contracting COVID-19 may have similar effects on individuals’ voluntary social interaction with their family, friends, and colleagues or classmates.
In contrast to the specific worry of contracting COVID-19, general anxiety is persistent, as well as excessive worry regarding numerous things, such as disaster, money, health, family, and work. During the COVID-19 pandemic, general anxiety may develop in both healthy individuals and people with preexisting mental health conditions [25]. The relationship between general anxiety and the reduction of social interaction during the COVID pandemic remains unclear. General anxiety may compromise individuals’ working memory [26], which is essential for the awareness of benefits over costs of social distancing [27]. General anxiety may also compromise the motivation to socially interact with other people [28]. The association between general anxiety and the voluntary reduction of social interaction warrants further study.
Research has revealed disparities in COVID-19 incidence, knowledge, and behavior among people with various demographic characteristics. A study in China revealed that individuals aged ≥65 years were more susceptible to COVID-19 infection [29]. A study in the United States reported that people aged <30 years were more likely to know someone who tested positive for COVID-19 than other age groups [30]. A study in the United States revealed that men possessed less COVID-19-related knowledge compared with women [30]. Furthermore, a study in Switzerland determined that women had worse mental health during the pandemic compared with men [14]. The associations of demographic characteristics with the voluntary reduction of social interaction in the general public warrant further study.

1.3. COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan

The number of COVID-19 cases in Taiwan is very low compared with numerous other countries or regions because of the early adoption of proactive containment and comprehensive contact tracing [31]. By 1 October 2020, 514 confirmed cases had been identified in Taiwan, among which 55 were domestic and 7 were fatal [32]. Taiwan experienced a major outbreak of 2002–2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), with the third-highest number of SARS cases after China and Hong Kong [33]. The traumatic experience of the SARS epidemic increased the vigilance of Taiwanese people toward COVID-19. People in Taiwan may voluntarily adopt protective behaviors, including reducing social interaction, despite the absence of government-imposed social lockdown. The extent of voluntarily reduced social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic and the factors related to the reduction of social interaction in Taiwan, where social distancing mostly remains voluntary, were investigated; the related results may contribute to the establishment of strategies to control the spread of respiratory infectious diseases in the future.

1.4. Aims of This Study

The present study had three aims. First, we examined the proportions of individuals who voluntarily reduced interaction with their family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates to avoid COVID-19 infection. Second, we examined the associations of reduced social interaction with perceived social support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Third, we examined the associations of demographic characteristics, worry regarding contracting COVID-19, and general anxiety with the reduction of social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

The current investigation was based on dataset of the Survey of Health Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan, which was comprehensively described elsewhere [34]. Briefly, a Facebook advertisement was deployed between 10 April and 23 April 2020. By 23 April 2020, 427 confirmed cases had been identified in Taiwan, of which six were fatal [32]. The inclusion criteria for participants were aged 20 years or older and residing in Taiwan. The Facebook advertisement included a headline, main text, pop-up banner, and link to the research questionnaire website. We designed the advertisement to appear in the Facebook users’ “news feeds,” which is a continually updated list of updates from advertisers and the user’s connections (such as friends and the Facebook groups that they have joined). Our advertisement only targeted users’ news feeds, as opposed to other Facebook advertising locations (e.g., the right column), because news feed advertisements are most effective in recruiting research participants [35]. We targeted the advertisement to Facebook users by location (Taiwan) and language (Chinese), where Facebook’s advertising algorithm determined which users to show our advertisement to. The survey administration software Google Forms was used for data collection (https://www.google.com/forms/about/). The Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (Kaohsiung City, Taiwan) approved this study (KMUHIRB-EXEMPT(I) 20200011) and ruled that informed consent was not required. At the end of the online questionnaire, participants were provided links to the COVID-19 sections of the websites of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and Medical College of National Cheng Kung University (Tainan City, Taiwan), to access COVID-19-related information and knowledge.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction

The voluntary reduction of social interaction because of COVID-19 was measured with the following three-part question: “In the last week, did you voluntarily reduce the frequency of interaction with your (1) family members, (2) friends, and (3) colleagues or classmates?” The response options were as follows: 1, “No”; 2, “Yes, but not to avoid COVID-19 infection”; and 3, “Yes, to avoid COVID-19 infection.” Responses 1 and 2 were classified as not voluntarily reducing social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, and response 3 was classified as voluntarily reducing social interaction.

2.2.2. Perceived Social Support

Perceived social support was measured with the following three-part question: “In the last week, were you satisfied with the support from your (1) family member, (2) friends, and (3) colleagues or classmates?” The response options were as follows: 0, “Not satisfied at all”; 1, “Mildly unsatisfied”; 2, “Fair”; 3, “Satisfied”; and 4, “Very satisfied.”

2.2.3. Worry about Contracting COVID-19

A five-item questionnaire was used to measure the level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19 [36]. The five items assessed the respondents’ level of worry if they developed flu-like symptoms, level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19, level of worry toward COVID-19, likelihood of contracting COVID-19, and chances of contracting COVID-19 compared with others outside their family. The questions, response scales, and scoring are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The scores of the five questions were summed. The Cronbach’s α was 0.759. The median total score of 2.95 was used as the cutoff, and respondents with total scores of ≤2.95 and >2.95 were classified as the low and high worry groups, respectively.

2.2.4. General Anxiety

The 10-item state anxiety scale from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was used to measure respondents’ general anxiety levels over the previous week [36,37,38]. The questions, response scales, and scoring are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The scores of the 10 items were summed. The Cronbach’s α was 0.921. The median total score of 23 was used as the cutoff, and respondents with total scores ≤23 and >23 were classified as the low and high general anxiety groups, respectively.

2.2.5. Demographic Variables

Participants’ sex (women vs. men), age, and education level (high school or below vs. college or above) were recorded. The median age (37 years old) was used as the cutoff, and respondents aged ≤37 and >37 years were classified as the younger and older groups, respectively.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data collected were input, processed and analyzed using the statistical software SPSS (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). First, the percentages of respondents who voluntarily reduced the frequency of social interaction with their family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates to avoid COVID-19 infection were calculated. Second, multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the associations of voluntarily reduced social interaction with perceived social support, controlling for the effects of demographic characteristics. Finally, the associations of demographic characteristics, worry regarding contracting COVID-19, and general anxiety with the voluntary reduction of social interaction were examined using multivariate logistic regression with odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Proportion of Respondents Who Voluntarily Reduced Their Social Interaction

In total, the data of 1954 respondents (649 men and 1305 women) were analyzed, with 70 of the original 2024 respondents excluded due to missing data. The demographic characteristics, percentage of respondents who voluntarily reduced their social interaction, levels of perceived social support, levels of worry regarding contracting COVID-19, and general anxiety are presented in Table 1. The results indicated that 38.1% of respondents voluntarily reduced their social interaction with friends to avoid COVID-19 infection, 36.1% voluntarily reduced their interaction with colleagues or classmates, and 11.1% voluntarily reduced interaction with family members; 23.2% and 9.3% of respondents voluntarily reduced two and three categories of social interaction, respectively.

3.2. Association between the Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction and Perceived Social Support

The relationship between the voluntary reduction of social interaction and perceived social support is presented in Figure 1 and Table 2. The results indicated that voluntary reduction of interaction with family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates were negatively associated with perceived support from family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates, respectively, after controlling for the effects of demographic characteristics.

3.3. Factors Related to the Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction

The factors related to each type of voluntary reduced social interaction are presented in Table 3. The results indicated that respondents who were older and had a higher level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19 were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates to avoid COVID-19 infection than respondents who were younger and had a lower level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19, respectively. Men were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with colleagues or classmates than women. Respondents with a low education level were less likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with friends compared with respondents with a higher education level. Respondents who had a higher level of general anxiety were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with family members than respondents who had a lower level of general anxiety.

4. Discussion

4.1. Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction and Its Association with Perceived Social Support

The present study revealed that 38.1% and 36.1% of respondents voluntarily reduced interaction with their friends and colleagues or classmates to avoid COVID-19 infection, respectively, whereas only 11.1% voluntarily reduced interaction with family members. A study in China revealed that the strict social distancing measures implemented reduced people’s daily contacts sevenfold to eightfold during the COVID-19 pandemic, with most interaction restricted to the household members [29]. Because face-to-face interaction and random encounters are minimized as a result of the social distancing measures, individuals likely focus on the relationships that are spatially close, most meaningful, or most established [14], such as those in the household [39]. The present study revealed that despite strict social distancing measures not being implemented in Taiwan, more than one-third of respondents voluntarily reduced their interaction with friends and colleagues or classmates. Moreover, the present study revealed that respondents who voluntarily reduced interaction with other people reported lower perceived social support than those who did not voluntarily reduce interaction. Therefore, voluntary reduction of social interaction appears to cause feelings of isolation and negatively affects perceived social support, whereas more social support may be required to cope with stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic [40]. Maintaining social contact can improve overall mental health, enhance feelings of social connectedness, and reduce loneliness. Therefore, the general public should be encouraged to maintain social contact through appropriately distanced in-person visits, telephone calls, video calls, and e-mail [21]. Novel models of social support and crisis intervention that utilize telecommunication, such as social media applications on smartphones, could be used during global pandemics [41]. However, people that are unable to access or use smartphones or the Internet have fewer opportunities to access social resources [42].

4.2. Factors Related to Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction

The present study determined that a higher level of worry regarding contracting COVID-19 was positively associated with the voluntary reduction of interaction with family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates because of COVID-19. The HBM [22,23], indicates that perceived susceptibility to and severity of infectious diseases were the cognitive constructs of health beliefs that contribute to the adoption of preventive actions [43]. However, people with excessive worry may implement extreme measures to cope with COVID-19; for example, extreme social isolation may obstruct access to the social support necessary to cope the pandemic. Delivering timely and adequate information regarding COVID-19 is essential to instill a reasonable range of concerns regarding COVID-19 in the general public [44].
The study results revealed that older respondents were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with family members, friends, and colleagues or classmates as a result of COVID-19 than younger respondents. A study published in March 2020 revealed that elderly people in China are susceptible to COVID-19 infection and prone to serious outcomes, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and cytokine storm [45]. The results were widely reported in Taiwan, which might have led older people to be vigilant and reduce social interaction to avoid contracting COVID-19. Moreover, older people in Taiwan may have clearer memories of SARS, which drives their proactive response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as voluntarily reducing social interaction. However, prolonged social isolation is significantly associated with higher risks of cognitive impairment and physical problems among elderly people [46]. Balancing the benefits and damages of social isolation during the pandemic among elderly people is a critical topic that should be addressed by governments and health professionals.
Male respondents were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with colleagues or classmates than female respondents. Respondents with higher levels of general anxiety were more likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with family members than respondents with lower levels of general anxiety. Respondents with lower education levels were less likely to voluntarily reduce interaction with friends compared with those with higher education levels. Research in China revealed that male sex (vs. female), age group of 16–29 years (vs. 30–49 years), and education level of bachelor’s degree or lower (vs. master degree and above) were significantly associated with lower knowledge of COVID-19 [47]. Research also revealed that women were more likely to display negative emotional effects as a result of the pandemic; however, women also generally rely on denser support networks, which may help them buffer the negative effects of the crisis [14]. The reasons underlying the various associations between general anxiety and voluntary reduction of interaction with different groups warrant further study.

4.3. Future Research

There are several lines of studies worth further examination based on the data of this study. First, the prediction of personality, coping strategies and psychopathology for voluntary reduction of social interactions during the pandemic warrants study. Second, the follow-up studies are needed to determine the outcomes of the individuals with voluntary reduction of social interactions. Third, what programs that governments and nongovernmental organizations can adopt to increase social support warrants further study. Fourth, cross-cultural comparisons may provide knowledge to understand cultural differences in changes of social relationship during the pandemic.

4.4. Limitations

The present study has some limitations. First, although recruiting participants using the Facebook advertisement can deliver large numbers of participants quickly [48], Facebook users may not be representative of the population. Second, the cross-sectional design of this study limited causal inference between voluntary reduction of social interaction and perceived social support. Third, there might be factors such as personality characteristics that were not examined in the present study accounting for both voluntary reduction of social interaction and decreased social support. Fourth, participants completed the online questionnaire anonymously. Hence, it is impossible to verify the identity of the respondents and their responses in the survey. It needs to be clarified by a face-to-face interview study with examining the test-retest reliability.

5. Conclusions

This Facebook-based online study on the general public found that 38.1%, 36.1% and 11.1% of respondents voluntarily reduced interaction with their friends, colleagues or classmates, and family members to avoid COVID-19 infection, respectively, despite strict social distancing measures not being implemented in Taiwan. Moreover, respondents who voluntarily reduced interaction with other people reported lower perceived social support than those who did not voluntarily reduce interaction. The general public should be encouraged to maintain social contact through appropriately distanced in-person visits and telecommunication. The present study identified that age, sex, educational level, worry regarding contracting COVID-19 and general anxiety were significantly associated with all or some aspects of reduced social interactions during the pandemic. The results indicated that the changes in social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic is a complicated phenomenon involving demographic characteristics and health beliefs. These factors can be used to early identify individuals who reduced social interaction with other people and then perceived low social support.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8039/s1, Table S1: Measures used in this study.

Author Contributions

W.-P.C. and C.-F.Y. designed and conducted the study, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. P.-W.W., S.-L.C., W.-H.L., C.-F.W. and Y.-P.C. drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins. Modeling 2019-nCoV. Available online: https://systems.jhu.edu/research/public-health/ncov-model (accessed on 18 July 2020).
  2. Torales, J.; O’Higgins, M.; Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; Ventriglio, A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2020, 66, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. McIntyre, R.S.; Lee, Y. Preventing suicide in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. World Psychiatry 2020, 19, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Crayne, M.P. The traumatic impact of job loss and job search in the aftermath of COVID-19. Psychol. Trauma 2020, 12, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rundle, A.G.; Park, Y.; Herbstman, J.B.; Kinsey, E.W.; Wang, Y.C. COVID-19-related school closings and risk of weight gain among children. Obesity 2020, 28, 1008–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Moore, S.A.; Faulkner, G.; Rhodes, R.E.; Brussoni, M.; Chulak-Bozzer, T.; Ferguson, L.J.; Mitra, R.; O’Reilly, N.; Spence, J.C.; Vanderloo, L.M.; et al. Impact of the COVID-19 virus outbreak on movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth: A national survey. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nicola, M.; Alsafi, Z.; Sohrabi, C.; Kerwan, A.; Al-Jabir, A.; Iosifidis, C.; Agha, M.; Agha, R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Int. J. Surg. 2020, 78, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oksanen, A.; Kaakinen, M.; Latikka, R.; Savolainen, I.; Savela, N.; Koivula, A. Regulation and trust: 3-month follow-up study on COVID-19 mortality in 25 European countries. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e19218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pollitt, K.J.G.; Peccia, J.; Ko, A.I.; Kaminski, N.; Dela Cruz, C.S.; Nebert, D.W.; Reichardt, J.K.V.; Thompson, D.C.; Vasiliou, V. COVID-19 vulnerability: The potential impact of genetic susceptibility and airborne transmission. Hum. Genom. 2020, 14, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chu, D.K.; Akl, E.A.; Duda, S.; Solo, K.; Yaacoub, S.; Schünemann, H.J. COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020, 395, 1973–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Glass, R.J.; Glass, L.M.; Beyeler, W.E.; Min, H.J. Targeted social distancing design for pandemic influenza. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bavel, J.J.V.; Baicker, K.; Boggio, P.S.; Capraro, V.; Cichocka, A.; Cikara, M.; Crockett, M.J.; Crum, A.J.; Douglas, K.M.; Druckman, J.N.; et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020, 4, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Elmer, T.; Mepham, K.; Stadtfeld, C. Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cooke, B.; Rossmann, M.; McCubbin, H.; Patterson, J. Examining the definition and assessment of social support: A resource for individuals and families. Fam. Relat. 1988, 37, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zysberg, L.; Zisberg, A. Days of worry: Emotional intelligence and social support mediate worry in the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ye, Z.; Yang, X.; Zeng, C.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Li, X.; Lin, D. Resilience, social support, and coping as mediators between COVID-19-related stressful experiences and acute stress disorder among college students in China. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, D.; Li, S.; Yang, N. The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e923549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Labrague, L.J.; De Los Santos, J.A.A. COVID-19 anxiety among front-line nurses: Predictive role of organisational support, personal resilience and social support. J. Nurs. Manag. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rozanova, J.; Shenoi, S.; Zaviryukha, I.; Zeziulin, O.; Kiriazova, T.; Rich, K.; Mamedova, E.; Yariy, V. Social support is key to retention in care during COCID-19 pandemic among older people with HIV and substance use disorders in Ukraine. Subst. Use Misuse 2020, 55, 1902–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pantell, M.S.; Shields-Zeeman, L. Maintaining social connections in the setting of COVID-19 social distancing: A call to action. Am. J. Public Health 2020, 110, 1367–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Glanz, K.; Rimer, B.K.; Viswanath, K. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosenstock, I.M.; Strecher, V.J.; Becker, M.H. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ. Behav. 1988, 15, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xie, K.; Liang, B.; Dulebenets, M.A.; Mei, Y. The impact of risk perception on social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shigemura, J.; Ursano, R.J.; Morganstein, J.C.; Kurosawa, M.; Benedek, D.M. Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: Mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 74, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vytal, K.E.; Arkin, N.E.; Overstreet, C.; Lieberman, L.; Grillon, C. Induced-anxiety differentially disrupts working memory in generalized anxiety disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2016, 16, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Xie, W.; Campbell, S.; Zhang, W. Working memory capacity predicts individual differences in social-distancing compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 17667–17674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Przeworski, A.; Newman, M.G.; Pincus, A.L.; Kasoff, M.B.; Yamasaki, A.S.; Castonguay, L.G.; Berlin, K.S. Interpersonal pathoplasticity in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2011, 120, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, J.; Litvinova, M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, S.; Wu, Q.; Merler, S.; Viboud, C.; Vespignani, A.; et al. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science 2020, 368, 1481–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alsan, M.; Stantcheva, S.; Yang, D.; Cutler, D. Disparities in coronavirus 2019 reported incidence, knowledge, and behavior among US adults. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2012403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, H.-Y.; Li, S.-Y.; Yang, C.-H. Initial rapid and proactive response for the COVID-19 outbreak—Taiwan’s experience. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2020, 119, 771–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. COVID-19. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov.tw/ (accessed on 18 July 2020).
  33. World Health Organization. Summary of Probable SARS Cases with Onset of Illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. 2004. Available online: https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/ (accessed on 6 September 2020).
  34. Wang, P.W.; Lu, W.H.; Ko, N.Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Li, D.J.; Chang, Y.P.; Yen, C.F. COVID-19-related information sources and the relationship with confidence in people coping with COVID-19: Facebook survey study in Taiwan. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e20021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramo, D.E.; Rodriguez, T.M.; Chavez, K.; Sommer Prochaska, J.J. Facebook recruitment of young adult smokers for a cessation trial: Methods, metrics, and lessons learned. Internet Interv. 2014, 1, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liao, Q.; Cowling, B.J.; Lam, W.W.; Ng, D.M.; Fielding, R. Anxiety, worry and cognitive risk estimate in relation to protective behaviors during the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 in Hong Kong: Ten cross-sectional surveys. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Leung, G.M.; Ho, L.M.; Chan, S.K.; Ho, S.Y.; Bacon-Shone, J.; Choy, R.Y.; Hedley, A.J.; Lam, T.H.; Fielding, R. Longitudinal assessment of community psychobehavioral responses during and after the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Spielberger, C.; Gorusch, R.; Luschene, R. State Trait Anxiety Inventory: A Test Manual/Test Form; Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bolger, N.; Eckenrode, J. Social relationships, personality, and anxiety during a major stressful event. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1991, 61, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Williams, S.N.; Armitage, C.J.; Tampe, T.; Dienes, K. Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e039334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cheng, P.; Xia, G.; Pang, P.; Wu, B.; Wei, J.; Li, Y.T.; Wang, M.; Ling, Q.; Chang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. COVID-19 epidemic peer support and crisis intervention via social media. Community Ment. Health J. 2020, 56, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nouri, S.; Khoong, E.C.; Lyles, C.R.; Karliner, L. Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the COVID-19 pandemic. NEJM Catal. Innov. Care Deliv. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dionne, G.; Desjardins, D.; Lebeau, M.; Messier, S.; Dascal, A. Health care workers’ risk perceptions and willingness to report for work during an influenza pandemic. Risks 2018, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hua, J.; Shaw, R. Corona virus (COVID-19) “infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: The case of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Guo, Y.R.; Cao, Q.D.; Hong, Z.S.; Tan, Y.Y.; Chen, S.D.; Jin, H.J.; Tan, K.S.; Wang, D.Y.; Yan, Y. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak—An update on the status. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Plagg, B.; Engl, A.; Piccoliori, G.; Eisendle, K. Prolonged social isolation of the elderly during COVID-19: Between benefit and damage. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020, 89, 104086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhong, B.L.; Luo, W.; Li, H.M.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Liu, X.G.; Li, W.T.; Li, Y. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: A quick online cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1745–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bobkowski, P.; Smith, J. Social media divide: Characteristics of emerging adults who do not use social network websites. Media Cult. Soc. 2013, 35, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 08039 g001 550
Figure 1. Levels of Perceived Social Support in the Participants with and Without Reduction of Social Interaction.
Figure 1. Levels of Perceived Social Support in the Participants with and Without Reduction of Social Interaction.
Ijerph 17 08039 g001
Table
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics, Reduction of Social Interaction, and Perceived Social Support, Worry About Contracting COVID-19, and General Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic (N = 1954).
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics, Reduction of Social Interaction, and Perceived Social Support, Worry About Contracting COVID-19, and General Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic (N = 1954).
Variablesn (%)Mean (SD)Range
Sex
Women1305 (66.8)
Men649 (33.2)
Age
Younger1000 (51.2)
Older954 (48.8)
Education level
High (university or above)1736 (88.8)
Low (high school or below)218 (11.2)
Reduction of social interaction with others
Family members217 (11.1)
Friends744 (38.1)
Colleagues or classmates706 (36.1)
One form213 (10.9)
Two forms454 (23.2)
Three forms182 (9.3)
Perceived social support
Family members 3.0 (0.8)0–4
Friends 2.9 (0.7)0–4
Colleagues or classmates 2.7 (0.8)0–4
Worry about contracting COVID-19
Low998 (51.1)
High956 (48.9)
General anxiety
Low1011 (51.7)
High943 (48.3)
COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; SD: standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Association between the Reduction of Social Interaction and Perceived Social Support: Multiple Regression Analysis.
Table 2. Association between the Reduction of Social Interaction and Perceived Social Support: Multiple Regression Analysis.
VariablesPerceived Support from Family MembersPerceived Support from FriendsPerceived Support from Colleagues/Classmates
B95% CI of BpB95% CI of BpB95% CI of Bp
Reduction of interactions with a
Family members−0.075−0.300, −0.0780.001
Friends −0.105−0.220, −0.088<0.001
Colleagues/classmates −0.112−0.268, −0.115<0.001
Men b0.0440.000, 0.1480.052−0.026−0.107, 0.0280.2430.016−0.049, 0.1070.479
Older age c0.0740.049, 0.1910.001−0.002−0.076, 0.0540.9450.0760.044, 0.1940.001
Low education level d−0.050−0.244, −0.0180.027−0.061−0.240, −0.0350.007−0.018−0.166, 0.0700.442
CI: Confidence interval. a: No reduction of social contact as the reference; b: Women as the reference; c: Younger age as the reference; d: High education level as the reference.
Table
Table 3. Factors Associated with the Three Types of Reduced Social Interaction: Logistic Regression Analysis.
Table 3. Factors Associated with the Three Types of Reduced Social Interaction: Logistic Regression Analysis.
VariablesReduction of Interactions with Family MembersReduction of Interactions with FriendsReduction of Interactions with Colleagues/Classmates
OR95% CI of ORpOR95% CI of ORpOR95% CI of ORp
Men a1.0250.749, 1.4010.8790.9930.810, 1.2190.9491.2701.036, 1.5570.022
Older age b1.3881.034, 1.8630.0291.7961.477, 2.183<0.0011.5871.305, 1.931<0.001
Low education level c0.8820.543, 1.4350.6140.7050.513, 0.9690.0310.7490.544, 1.0300.076
High worry about contracting COVID-19 d2.1031.536, 2.879<0.0012.5082.051, 3.067<0.0012.3051.884, 2.821<0.001
High general anxiety e1.8511.346, 2.546<0.0011.2060.984, 1.4800.0721.2100.986, 1.4850.068
CI: Confidence interval; COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; OR: Odds ratio. a: Women as the reference; b: Younger age as the reference; c: High education level as the reference; d: Low worry as the reference; e: Low general anxiety as the reference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chou, W.-P.; Wang, P.-W.; Chen, S.-L.; Chang, Y.-P.; Wu, C.-F.; Lu, W.-H.; Yen, C.-F. Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Related Factors and Association with Perceived Social Support. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218039

AMA Style

Chou W-P, Wang P-W, Chen S-L, Chang Y-P, Wu C-F, Lu W-H, Yen C-F. Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Related Factors and Association with Perceived Social Support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(21):8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chou, Wei-Po, Peng-Wei Wang, Shiou-Lan Chen, Yu-Ping Chang, Chia-Fen Wu, Wei-Hsin Lu, and Cheng-Fang Yen. 2020. "Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Related Factors and Association with Perceived Social Support" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 21: 8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218039

APA Style

Chou, W.-P., Wang, P.-W., Chen, S.-L., Chang, Y.-P., Wu, C.-F., Lu, W.-H., & Yen, C.-F. (2020). Voluntary Reduction of Social Interaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Related Factors and Association with Perceived Social Support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop