“They could just say [vaping is] less harmful, right? … But then they downplay it again… And that’s like, we all know that. But it’s still healthier than the latter, than the cigarettes. So, just let me make my decision is what I’m saying. Give me all of the facts, all of the facts, and I’ll make a decision.”(from an interview for the “Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and California Youth” study )
“The effectiveness of institutions depends heavily on the public’s trust. Factors that contribute to trust in an institution include the following actions on the part of the institution: communication; truth telling; transparency (i.e., not concealing information); accountability; reliability; and reciprocity. One critical form of reciprocity and communication is listening to as well as speaking with the community.”
Conflicts of Interest
- Jhanjee, S. Putting tobacco harm reduction in perspective: Is it a viable alternative? Indian J. Med. Res. 2016, 143, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kozlowski, L.T. Prospects for a nicotine-reduction strategy in the cigarette endgame: Alternative tobacco harm reduction scenarios. Int. J. Drug Policy 2015, 26, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Stimson, G.V. A tale of two epidemics: Drugs harm reduction and tobacco harm reduction in the United Kingdom. Drugs Alcohol Today 2016, 16, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, W.; Gartner, C.; Forlini, C. Ethical issues raised by a ban on the sale of electronic nicotine devices. Addiction 2015, 110, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Glantz, S.A.; Bareham, D.W. E-Cigarettes: Use, Effects on Smoking, Risks, and Policy Implications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2018, 39, 215–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Abrams, D.B.; Glasser, A.M.; Pearson, J.L.; Villanti, A.C.; Collins, L.K.; Niaura, R.S. Harm Minimization and Tobacco Control: Reframing Societal Views of Nicotine Use to Rapidly Save Lives. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2018, 39, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Green, L.W.; Fielding, J.E.; Brownson, R.C. The Debate About Electronic Cigarettes: Harm Minimization or the Precautionary Principle. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2018, 39, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, W.; Gartner, C.; Forlini, C. Nuances in the ethical regulation of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Addiction 2015, 110, 1074–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kiviniemi, M.T.; Kozlowski, L.T. Deficiencies in public understanding about tobacco harm reduction: Results from a United States national survey. Harm. Reduct. J. 2015, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlowski, L.T.; Sweanor, D. Withholding differential risk information on legal consumer nicotine/tobacco products: The public health ethics of health information quarantines. Int. J. Drug Policy 2016, 32, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Franck, C.; Filion, K.B.; Kimmelman, J.; Grad, R.; Eisenberg, M.J. Ethical considerations of e-cigarette use for tobacco harm reduction. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Biener, L.; Nyman, A.L.; Stepanov, I.; Hatsukami, D. Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: An intervention for tobacco control professionals. Tob. Control 2014, 23, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czoli, C.D.; Fong, G.T.; Mays, D.; Hammond, D. How do consumers perceive differences in risk across nicotine products? A review of relative risk perceptions across smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy and combustible cigarettes. Tob. Control 2017, 26, e49–e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Popova, L.; Ling, P.M. Perceptions of relative risk of snus and cigarettes among US smokers. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, e21–e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McNeill, A.; Brose, L.S.; Calder, R.; Bauld, L.; Robson, D. Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/684963/Evidence_review_of_e-cigarettes_and_heated_tobacco_products_2018.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2019).
- Science and Technology Committee. E-cigarettes: Seventh report of session 2017–19; House of Commons: London, UK, 2018.
- Brose, L.S.; Brown, J.; Hitchman, S.C.; McNeill, A. Perceived relative harm of electronic cigarettes over time and impact on subsequent use. A survey with 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015, 157, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Huerta, T.R.; Walker, D.M.; Mullen, D.; Johnson, T.J.; Ford, E.W. Trends in e-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness in the US. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-0-309-46834-3. [Google Scholar]
- Gartner, C.E.; Hall, W.D.; Chapman, S.; Freeman, B. Should the Health Community Promote Smokeless Tobacco (Snus) as a Harm Reduction Measure? PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Annechino, R.; Antin, T. Taking Sides in E-cigarette Research. Ethnogr. Prax. Ind. Conf. Proc. 2016, 2016, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Frieden, T.R. Six Components Necessary for Effective Public Health Program Implementation. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 104, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, S.R.; Jazwa, A.; Popova, L.; Slovic, P.; Rothenberg, R.B.; Eriksen, M.P. Worldviews and trust of sources for health information on electronic nicotine delivery systems: Effects on risk perceptions and use. SSM Popul. Health 2017, 3, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Notley, C.; Cox, S.; Jakes, S.; Ross, L. What is the value of peer involvement in advancing tobacco harm reduction? Harm. Reduct. J. 2019, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Public Health Leadership Society. Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health 2002. Available online: https://www.apha.org/-/media/files/pdf/membergroups/ethics/ethics_brochure.ashx (accessed on 4 January 2019).
- Sisk, B.; Frankel, R.; Kodish, E.; Harry Isaacson, J. The Truth about Truth-Telling in American Medicine: A Brief History. Perm. J. 2016, 20, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hardin, R. Trustworthiness. Ethics 1996, 107, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spiegelhalter, D. Risk and uncertainty communication. Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl. 2017, 4, 31–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frewer, L. The public and effective risk communication. Toxicol. Lett. 2004, 149, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gamble, V.N. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. Am. J. Public Health 1997, 87, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drope, J.; Liber, A.C.; Cahn, Z.; Stoklosa, M.; Kennedy, R.; Douglas, C.E.; Henson, R.; Drope, J. Who’s still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harrington, M. Survey: People’s Trust Has Declined in Business, Media, Government, and NGOs. Available online: https://hbr.org/2017/01/survey-peoples-trust-has-declined-in-business-media-government-and-ngos (accessed on 6 August 2018).
- Public Trust in Government Remains Near Historic Lows as Partisan Attitudes Shift, 2017. Available online: http://www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-remains-near-historic-lows-as-partisan-attitudes-shift/ (accessed on 4 January 2019).
- Marwick, A.; Lewis, R. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online; Data & Society Research Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bradshaw, S.; Howard, P.N. Challenging Truth and Trust: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation; Oxford Internet Institute: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bruns, A. The active audience: Transforming journalism from gatekeeping to gatewatching. In Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production; Paterson, C.A., Domingo, D., Eds.; Peter Lang: Bern, Switzerland, 2008; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Seymour, B.; Gyenes, N.; Roberts, H.; Fish, S.A.; Bermejo, F.; Zuckerman, E. Public health, Social Networks, and the Digital Media Ecosystem. Available online: http://salis.org/salisjournal/vol4/1_Seymour_2017.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2019).
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).