Next Article in Journal
Terpenoids from Marine Soft Coral of the Genus Lemnalia: Chemistry and Biological Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Mangrove Tirucallane- and Apotirucallane-Type Triterpenoids: Structure Diversity of the C-17 Side-Chain and Natural Agonists of Human Farnesoid/Pregnane–X–Receptor
Previous Article in Journal
The Bisindole Alkaloid Caulerpin, from Seaweeds of the Genus Caulerpa, Attenuated Colon Damage in Murine Colitis Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Eudesmane-Type Sesquiterpenoids from the Mangrove-Derived Endophytic Fungus Penicillium sp. J-54
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms

Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Universitaetsstrasse 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2018, 16(9), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090319
Submission received: 7 August 2018 / Revised: 22 August 2018 / Accepted: 29 August 2018 / Published: 7 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Mangroves and Their-Associated Microbes)

Abstract

:
The mangrove ecosystem is considered as an attractive biodiversity hotspot that is intensively studied in the hope of discovering new useful chemical scaffolds, including those with potential medicinal application. In the past two decades, mangrove-derived microorganisms, along with mangrove plants, proved to be rich sources of bioactive secondary metabolites as exemplified by the constant rise in the number of publications, which suggests the great potential of this important ecological niche. The present review summarizes selected examples of bioactive compounds either from mangrove endophytes or from soil-derived mangrove fungi and bacteria, covering the literature from 2014 to March 2018. Accordingly, 163 natural products are described in this review, possessing a wide range of potent bioactivities, such as cytotoxic, antibacterial, antifungal, α-glucosidase inhibitory, protein tyrosine phosphatase B inhibitory, and antiviral activities, among others.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mangrove (mangal) communities represent a coastal habitat located in tropical and subtropical intertidal estuarine zones, occurring in 112 countries, and mostly attributed to latitudes between 30° N and 30° S [1]. Special ecological conditions of mangroves include relatively high tidal range, high average temperature with little seasonal fluctuation, high salinity, strong winds, and muddy anaerobic or sandy soil [1,2,3]. The flora of these communities includes the so-called “exclusive” or true mangroves as well as “nonexclusive” mangrove species that inhabit other terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems (semi-mangrove or mangrove associates). Tomlinson defines true mangroves by several criteria, including exclusive occurrence in mangrove ecosystem, morphological adaptations (e.g., aerial roots and viviparous, water-dispersed propagules), physiological mechanisms for salt exclusion/excretion, as well as taxonomical distinctness from terrestrial species (at least at the generic level), albeit all these characteristics are not necessary to be present among one plant species [1]. One of the main extreme habitat factors that influences mangroves is high salinity, resulting in the following specific leaf traits and osmotic properties of true mangroves: lower specific leaf area, higher succulence, lower K+/Na+ ratio, higher Na+ and Cl contents, and hence higher osmolality in contrast to semi-mangrove plants [4]. Since mangrove ecosystems can be viewed as an extreme environment, which demands various morphological and physiological adaptations of inhabiting species, the biosynthetic potential of the latter to produce a distinct array of novel chemical entities is apparent. Thus, the mangrove ecosystem is considered as an attractive biodiversity hotspot that is intensively investigated in the hope of discovering new structural scaffolds, including those with medicinal applications. Indeed, studies on secondary metabolites from mangrove plants in the past were found to be quite fruitful, and gave rise to new carbon frameworks accompanied by pronounced biological activities [2]. Notable recent examples of bioactive derivatives from mangroves include the tetranortriterpenoids xylogranatins A–D [5] and krischnadimer A [6], as well as the triterpenoid paracaseolin [7] possessing potent cytotoxic activity toward cancerous cells, the limonoids krishnolides A–D with anti-HIV activity [8], and thaixylomolin B with anti-inflammatory properties [9]. Furthermore, secondary metabolites from typical mangrove plants of the genera Xylocarpus, Avicennia, Rhizophora, and Bruguiera significantly enriched our current knowledge of the chemistry of complex tetranorterpenoids (limonoids), di- and triterpenoids, and iridoids, among others [2,10].
Mangrove-associated microorganisms, including fungal and bacterial endophytes, as well as microbes derived from soil samples, have likewise drawn the attention of natural product researchers. Remarkable discoveries of bioactive xyloketals with unprecedented structures from Xylaria sp. [11] and salinosporamide A from the mangrove bacterium Salinospora tropica [12] in the early 2000s indicated a great potential for drug discovery and inspired further studies on microbes derived from mangroves. Intensive investigation of the latter resulted in more than 350 publications that appeared during the last ten years, focusing on natural product chemistry, bioactivity, biotechnology, and chemical synthesis of their bioactive metabolites, thus demonstrating the potential of mangrove-associated microbes as a prolific source of lead compounds [13]. Particularly, over the last decade, research on these microbes resulted in characterization of almost 1000 new metabolites, among them, ~850 derived from fungi (the majority of them obtained as endophytes), and ~120 from bacteria [14]. Thus, the overall trend in the number of experimental articles dedicated to description of new/bioactive mangrove-derived metabolites over the past ten years, remains promising (Figure 1) [13].
Attempts to estimate fungal and bacterial diversity from soil samples collected in mangroves of Saudi Arabia, China, Brazil, and India showed a high diversity of associated microbes [15,16,17,18,19]. Interestingly, a study directed towards the estimation of bacterial diversity, utilizing 16S rRNA sequencing, demonstrated that the bacterial community of pristine mangrove sediments contains species that are mostly unrelated to known bacteria [19]. Moreover, analysis of culturable fungal endophytes collected in Brazil indicated that among fungal isolates some species could not be classified within any known genera [20]. These investigations, together with promising results from studies on mangrove-associated secondary metabolites, demonstrate this unique ecosystem as a rich reservoir of natural product diversity that could be utilized in the exploration of new drug leads.
Advances in natural products derived from mangrove actinomycetes were discussed by Xu et al. (up to 2013) [21]. Bioactive natural products from mangrove-associated microorganisms, their chemical features and biosynthetic aspects, covering the time span of 2011–2013, were summarized by Jing Xu [22]. In this review, we highlight selected examples (studies in which at least one compound exhibits IC50 (/MIC) values less than 10 μM (/10 μg/mL) and/or comparable or higher activity than that of the positive control in the respective bioassay) of recently described microbial bioactive compounds of mangrove origin. The time frame covered in this paper extends from 2014 to March 2018. The articles selected for the review contain natural products with mechanism-of-action studies and/or compounds with pronounced activity. The natural products described herein are grouped according to the microorganism ecological source into endophytes and those derived from soil, the latter group including studies on compounds of fungal or bacterial origin.

2. Bioactive Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms

2.1. Bioactive Compounds from Endophytic Fungi

2.1.1. Cytotoxic Compounds

Meng et al. successfully isolated twenty-one new compounds from a single fungal strain Penicillium brocae MA-231, obtained from fresh tissue of the marine mangrove plant Avicennia marina (Hainan Island, China) using different types of media for cultivation of this fungus [23,24,25,26]. The first fermentation on potato-dextrose broth (PDB) medium afforded six new disulfide-bridged diketopiperazines brocazines A–F [23]. Among them, brocazines A (1), B (2), E (3), and F (4) (Figure 2) displayed cytotoxicity against a panel of human tumor cell lines, including Du145 (human prostate cancer), HeLa (cervical cancer), HepG2 (liver cancer), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), NCI-H460 (non-small-cell lung cancer), SGC-7901 (gastric cancer), SW1990 (pancreatic adenocarcinoma), SW480 (colon cancer), and U251 (glioblastoma) with IC50 values in the range from 0.89 to 12.4 μM, whereas brocazines C and D did not show activity, indicating that the presence of two double bonds at positions C-6 and C-6′ or of one double bond at C-6/6′ in conjugation with a keto group (at C-5/5′), plays an important role in the cytotoxicity of these metabolites. In a further study, chemical investigation of the extract from the fungus grown in Czapek medium showed induction of new natural products, among them, the bisthiodiketopiperazine derivative brocazine G (5) (Figure 2) that was active against A2780 (human ovarian cancer) cells that are either sensitive (sens) or resistant (CisR) to the cytostatic drug cisplatin [24]. Interestingly, compound 5 displayed potent activity to both cell lines with IC50 values of 664 and 661 nM, respectively. In addition, 5 showed strong activity against Staphylococcus aureus with an MIC value of 0.62 μM (0.25 μg/mL), stronger than that of the positive control chloromycetin (MIC = 1.55 μM/0.5 μg/mL). Moreover, other studies on this fungus yielded a series of antibacterial compounds (2026) that are described in Section 2.1.2.
The endophytic fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae ZJ-HQ1, isolated from healthy leaves of the marine mangrove Acanthus ilicifolius (Guangdong Province, China), afforded two new chlorinated preussomerins (6 and 7) along with nine known analogs [27]. Interestingly, 6, 7, and the known compounds 814 (Figure 3), exhibited cytotoxicity against a panel of human cancer cell lines, including A549 (lung adenocarcinoma), HepG2, MCF-7, HeLa, and HEK 293T (embryonic kidney) cells, with IC50 values ranging from 2.5 to 83 μM. Structure–activity relationship analyses revealed that a ketone group at C-1 and/or a chlorine group at C-2 in ring A are favorable substituents for cytotoxicity of preussomerins. Furthermore, compounds 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, and 14 showed activity toward S. aureus with MIC values between 4.4 and 35.9 μM (1.6 and 13 μg/mL). However, the respective compounds were found to be inactive against a panel of Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella enteritidis, thus suggesting their selective inhibitory activity against Gram-positive bacteria, which is probably connected with the exerted cytotoxicity of these metabolites (Figure 3) [27].
The endophyte Annulohypoxylon sp. CA-2013, isolated from the mangrove plant Rhizophora racemosa, collected in Cameroon, led to the characterization of new benzo[j]fluoranthene-based congeners, daldinones H–J [28]. All compounds were tested for their cytotoxicity, and daldinone I (15) was shown to be the most active derivative (Figure 4). Interestingly, 15 was shown to be an artefact formed from daldinone H through intramolecular dehydration. Compound 15 exhibited strong to moderate cytotoxicity against adult lymphoblastic leukemia T cells (Jurkat J16) and Burkitt’s lymphoma B lymphocytes (Ramos), with IC50 values of 14.1 and 6.6 μM, respectively. Mechanism-of-action studies showed that 15 activates caspases, and subsequently induces apoptosis in Ramos cells with a rapid kinetic profile, comparable to that of the potent known apoptosis inducer staurosporine. Treatment of caspase-9-deficient and caspase-9-reconstituted Jurkat cells with 15 revealed that its pro-apoptotic effect is connected with caspase-9-dependent intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptosis. Moreover, treatment of murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) cells possessing high expression level of mCitrine-hLC3B with 15, and subsequent analysis of the level of LC3 protein (component of the membrane structure of autophagosomes) in cells, indicated that daldinone I (15), alone or together with the pan-caspase inhibitor QVD, shows inhibition of autophagy in a caspase-independent manner (Figure 4).
Investigation of the fungal strain Rhytidhysteron rufulum AS21B, isolated from Azima sarmentosa, which was collected from a mangrove area in Samutsakhon Province, Thailand, afforded a series of spirobisnaphthalene analogs, among them, compounds 1618 and 4041, exhibiting cytotoxic and nitric oxide (NO) production inhibitory activities, respectively (see Section 2.1.3). Cultivation of the fungus under slightly acidic conditions (pH = 5) led to a distinct change in its metabolic profile, affording two new spirobisnaphthalenes, rhytidenones G and H (17), along with eleven known compounds, among them, rhytidenones E and F (16 and 18, respectively) [29]. The production of the latter compound (18) was increased 8-fold compared to the culture under normal conditions (pH = 7), allowing its detection and isolation from the culture extract. Compounds 16 and 18 displayed potent activity against Ramos and drug resistant NSCLC H1975 (non-small cell lung cancer) cells, with IC50 values in the range between 0.018 and 1.17 μM. Moreover, compound 17 showed selective activity toward the Ramos lymphoma cell line with an IC50 value of 0.461 μM. These findings suggest that the C-4 α,β-unsaturated ketone moiety is essential for the potent cytotoxicity of these metabolites (Figure 5) [29].
Phomoxanthone A (19) is a tetrahydroxanthone dimeric natural product that has attracted significant attention due to its cytotoxic, antibacterial, and antifungal properties. In our research group, this intriguing metabolite was isolated from the endophyte Phomopsis longicolla that was derived from the mangrove plant Sonneratia caesolaris, collected on Hainan Island, South China (Figure 6) [30,31]. Initial cytotoxicity screening of 19 showed pronounced growth inhibition of cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant cell lines (IC50 in the range from 0.7 to 5.2 μM) in our bioassays, confirming the literature data [30]. Preliminary mechanistic investigations revealed caspase activation and proapoptotic activities of 19. Moreover, potent activation of murine T cells, NK cells, and macrophages after treatment with 19 were observed assuming cell immune stimulation to be part of the biological profile of phomoxanthone A (19). Semisynthetic studies revealed that a 4–4′ linkage between the tetrahydroxanthone monomers is favorable for mediating cytotoxicity [30]. The pronounced cytotoxicity of phomoxanthone A (19) towards cancer cells encouraged further investigation of its mode of action, through which the apoptotic events in the cells are released. At first, the effect of 19 on cellular Ca2+ levels was examined [32]. As a result, the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in Ramos cells treated with 19 was strongly increased, showing a similar pattern to that of the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate; however, 19 did not show any activity when tested against a broad panel of protein kinases. Furthermore, 19 was able to increase the cytosolic Ca2+ level in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, thus suggesting that the Ca2+ increase is caused by direct effects of the compound on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or on mitochondria. Co-treatment of the cells with thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the ER CaATPase, and 19 resulted in a higher increase of the Ca2+ concentration than that observed for cells treated solely with 19, thus indicating that the Ca2+ origin caused by 19 should be connected with other cell sources of these ions. Indeed, estimation of the effect of 19 on Ca2+ using HeLa cells expressing CEPIA (calcium-measuring organelle-entrapped protein indicators) Ca2+ probes targeted to the ER or mitochondria confirmed that 19 causes strong and rapid depletion of Ca2+ stored in mitochondria. Further comparison of the mitochondrial response after treatment with 19 with effects of the known mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) inducer ionomycin, and the mPTP inhibitor, cyclosporine A, allowed the conclusion that Ca2+ release caused by 19 is largely independent from the mPTP mechanism. Therefore, the mitochondrial Ca2+ release is likely to be connected with changes in other mitochondrial ion gradients. Further analysis of the effect of 19 revealed immediate depolarization of the membrane potential ΔΨm, similar to carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP), an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation. However, 19 produced only a slight decrease in cellular O2 consumption, in contrast to the rapid kinetics by CCCP, caused through the uncoupling of the proton gradient. Moreover, measurement of O2 consumption after respiration enhancement by CCCP showed a strong decrease in O2 utilization, pointing to the inhibition of cellular respiration and of electron transport chain (ETC) by 19. Detailed analysis of the effects of 19 on these mitochondrial processes based on comparison with known ETC inhibitors that target different complexes of the ETC and ATP synthase, such as rotenone, thenoyltrifluoroacetone, and antimycin A, suggested that 19 disturbs complex I and II of ETC or interferes with the shuttling of electrons between complex I/II and III. Moreover, 19, like CCCP, caused stress-induced OPA1 (enzyme essential for regulation of the equilibrium between mitochondrial fusion and mitochondrial fission) cleavage that was dependent on metalloendopeptidase OMA1, and led to cristae disruption, although it was proven that the disruption occurs independently of OMA1. Since mitochondrial fission is also regulated by the dynamin-related protein DRP1, which mediates outer mitochondrial membrane fission, the DRP1-deficient MEF cells were analyzed in the presence of 19, and the fragmentation was likewise observed. Experiments with dual staining of the mitochondrial matrix and the outer mitochondrial membrane, affected by 19 and CCCP (a positive control for fragmentation), showed that the outer membrane appeared to remain connected. This effect could also be observed in cells deficient for both DRP1 and OPA1, indicating induction of mitochondrial fission by 19 independently of canonical regulators. Finally, a close examination of the mitochondrial ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that 19 causes OMA1-independent disruption of mitochondrial matrix morphology, complete loss of cristae, and condensation of inner membrane structures at the outer membrane. Taken together, it was shown that the inner, but not the outer, mitochondrial membrane structure rapidly collapses into fragments, leading to cristae disruption, and eventually apoptosis upon treatment with 19, thus implying that phomoxanthone A (19) is a mitochondrial toxin with a novel mode of action, which is distinct from other known ETC inhibitors, OXPHOS uncouplers, and ionophores. Further studies on the identification of the molecular target of 19, through which mitochondrial Ca2+ release and inner mitochondrial membrane fission is induced, will undoubtedly uncover the mechanism of action of this interesting mycotoxin [32].

2.1.2. Antimicrobial Compounds

Subsequent work on the fungal extract of P. brocae MA-231 (see Section 2.1.1), cultured on PDB medium, allowed for the characterization of five new sulfide diketopiperazine derivatives, namely, penicibrocazines A–E, and one known analog, phomazine B (24) [25]. All compounds were tested for their antimicrobial properties against several human- or plant-pathogenic, as well as marine microorganisms. Penicibrocazines B–D (2022) and 24 (Figure 7) showed activity against S. aureus with MIC values of 82, 0.55, 17.6, and 0.55 μM (32.0, 0.25, 8.0 and 0.25 μg/mL), respectively, compared to the positive control chloromycetin (MIC = 12.4 μM/4.0 μg/mL). Compound 21 showed strong inhibiting activity against Micrococcus luteus with an MIC value of 0.55 μM (0.25 μg/mL), which is higher than that of chloromycetin (MIC = 6.2 μM/2.0 μg/mL). Moreover, derivatives 20, 22, penicibrocazine E (23) and 24 were active against the plant pathogen Gaeumannomyces graminis with MICs 0.64, 17.6, 0.55, and 159 μM (0.25, 8.0, 0.25, and 64.0 μg/mL), respectively, whereas the positive control amphotericin B displayed an MIC value of 17.3 μM (16.0 μg/mL). Evaluation of penicibrocazines A–E against eight tumor cell lines showed no significant cytotoxicity (IC50 > 10 μM). Further cultivation of P. brocae in liquid Czapek medium yielded four new thiodiketopiperazine alkaloids, penicibrocazines F–I, as well as two new N-containing p-hydroxyphenopyrrozin derivatives brocapyrrozins A (25) and B [26]. Subjected to the same bioactivity assays as in the previous report [25], 25 and the known compound 4-hydroxy-3-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one (26) (Figure 7) showed strong inhibitory activity against the bacterium S. aureus and the fungus Fusarium oxysporum with MIC values ranging from 0.41 to 2.85 μM (0.125 to 0.5 μg/mL). These values were equipotent or stronger than those of the positive antibacterial and antifungal controls, chloromycetin (MIC = 1.55 μM/0.5 μg/mL) and zeocin (MIC = 0.35 μM/0.5 μg/mL), respectively. The aforementioned results indicated that the presence of an acetonyl group at C-2 is favorable for the antibiotic activity of brocapyrrozins.
A fungal strain Stemphylium sp. 33231 isolated from the mangrove Bruguiera sexangula var. rhynchopetala collected from the South China Sea yielded eight new and seventeen known metabolites [33]. Among them, two new anthraquinone derivatives (27 and 28), two alterporriol-type anthranoid dimers (29 and 30), as well as the known analogs, altersolanols A–C (3133), macrosporin (34), tetrahydroaltersolanol B (35), and alterporriols B (36), C (37), D (38), and E (39), were found to possess moderate or weak antibacterial properties when tested against a panel of terrestrial and pathogenic bacteria, such as Micrococcus tetragenus, E. coli, Staphylococcus albus, Bacillus cereus, S. aureus, Kocuria rhizophila, and Bacillus subtilis (Figure 8). Metabolites 28, 31, 32, 34, and 38 were active against at least three bacterial strains, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in the range between 2.07 and 10 μM. Compounds 27, 33, and 37 exhibited selective activity against E. coli (MIC = 9.8 μM), B. subtilis (MIC = 8.8 μM), and S. albus (MIC = 8.9 μM), respectively, while compounds 29, 30, and 36 showed selectivity against B. cereus strain with MIC values of 8.3, 8.1, and 7.9 μM, correspondingly. In addition, compound 39 showed antibacterial activity against two tested strains, B. cereus (MIC = 2.5 μM) and E. coli (MIC = 5.0 μM). All aforementioned metabolites, with the exception of 33 and 35, were investigated for cytotoxicity against mouse melanoma (B16F10) and A549 cell lines, however, showed no activity (IC50 > 10 μM). Moreover, these compounds were found to be inactive when tested for brine shrimp lethality using Artemia salina, thus suggesting that their antibacterial activity is not due to general cytotoxicity [33].

2.1.3. Compounds with Inhibitory Activity towards NO Production

The endophyte R. rufulum AS21B (see Section 2.1.1) afforded six new spirobisnaphthalene derivatives, namely, rhytidenones A–F [34]. Among the isolated compounds, rhytidenone C (40) showed the most potent inhibitory effect on NO production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated J774.A1 macrophages with an IC50 value of 0.31 μM. On the other hand, the anti-inflammatory activity of rhytidenone D (41) was 10-fold lower (IC50 = 3.60 μM), indicating that the α-orientation of the hydroxy group at position 7 is favorable for the anti-inflammatory activity of these metabolites. Remarkably, 40 and 41 exhibited no cytotoxicity in the respective cells, thus indicating that they are potential leads for the development of anti-inflammatory agents (Figure 9).
Cultivation of the fungus L. theobromae ZJ-HQ1 (see Section 2.1.1) on solid rice media with different salinity (0.3%) led to the isolation of the novel lactone lasiodiplactone A (42) with an unusual tetracyclic system, containing a 12-membered β-resorcylic acid lactone, a pyran, and a furan ring (Figure 10) [35]. Compound 42 showed potent inhibitory activity toward NO production in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells with an IC50 value of 23.5 μM, comparable to that of the positive control indomethacin (IC50 = 26.3 μM). Interestingly, compound 42 did not show any cytotoxicity against LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells up to 100 μM, thus indicating that the NO inhibitory effect of 42 is not due to cytotoxicity. Moreover, compound 42 displayed strong α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 29.4 μM, which was stronger than the clinically used anti-diabetic drug acarbose (IC50 = 367 μM).

2.1.4. Compounds with α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

The endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp. 16-5B, obtained from leaves of Sonneratia apetala (Hainan Island, China), was investigated, and this resulted in the characterization of polyketides with in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (4345) (Figure 11) [36]. Interestingly, the new metabolite aspergifuranone (43) showed significant inhibition of enzyme activity, with an IC50 value of 9 μM, which is approximately 60-fold more potent than the clinically used α-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose (IC50 = 554 μM). Moreover, a new isocoumarin derivative (44), which was isolated as a racemate, along with the known metabolite pestaphthalide A (45), displayed considerable inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase with IC50 values of 90 and 70 μM, respectively. Subsequent kinetic analysis of the most active compound (43) revealed that it exhibits noncompetitive inhibition characteristics. A later study from the same research group led to the isolation of fifteen isocoumarins (4660), including six new natural products, which were derived from Talaromyces amestolkiae YX1, an endophyte of Kandelia obovata (Guangdong Province, China) (Figure 11) [37]. Remarkably, all these derivatives exhibited α-glucosidase inhibiting activity, with IC50 values ranging from 17.2 to 585.7 μM, which were more potent than acarbose (IC50 = 958.3 μM).

2.1.5. Compounds with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase B (MptpB) Inhibitory Activity

The endophytic fungus Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3, isolated from the mangrove plant Excoecaria agallocha, afforded three isoprenylisoindole alkaloids with a rare 1,4-benzodioxan moiety, namely diaporisoindoles A–C, in addition to the known derivative tenellone C (62) [38]. Diaporisoindole A (61) and 62 (Figure 12) showed strong inhibitory activity toward MptpB, with IC50 values of 4.2 and 5.2 μM, respectively (positive control oleanolic acid; IC50 22.1 μM). Interestingly, the co-isolated diastereomer diaporisoindole B, possessing an 8R configuration, displayed no activity, indicating that the S configuration at C-8 is essential for the MptpB inhibitory effect of 61. In order to get further insights into the mode of action of these compounds, enzyme kinetic analysis was performed. The results showed that 61 acted as an uncompetitive inhibitor, whereas 62 as a competitive inhibitor. Moreover, compounds 61 and 62 showed no inhibitory activity against protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) at a concentration of 200 μM, suggesting that they are selective MptpB inhibitors, and thus potential leads for anti-TB investigation.
Further bioactive metabolites derived from mangrove endophytes that could serve as potential lead structures are presented in Table 1, and Figure 13 and Figure 14.

2.2. Bioactive Compounds Derived from Fungi Originating from Mangrove (Rhizosphere) Soil/Sediment Samples

2.2.1. Cytotoxic Compounds

The fungal strain Aspergillus versicolor HDN1009 derived from mangrove soil that was collected in Guangzhou, China yielded six unusual heterogeneous dimers, versixanthones A–F (106111) possessing a tetrahydroxanthone unit and a biogenetically-related chromanone monomer coupled via a biaryl linkage, as well as a known compound, secalonic acid D (112) [51]. All compounds were tested for cytotoxicity toward HL-60, K562 (myelogenous leukemia), A549, H1975, MGC-803 (human gastric cancer), HO8910 (ovarian cancer), and HCT-116 (colorectal carcinoma) cell lines. Interestingly, compounds 106108 showed activity against at least two cell types, with IC50 values between 2.6 and 25.6 μM, and derivatives 109112 exhibited cytotoxicity against at least five cancer lines with IC50 values ranging between 0.7 and 21 μM (Figure 15). Remarkably, among all new compounds, only 110 revealed topoisomerase I inhibitory activity, as was previously shown for the known derivative secalonic acid D (112) [51].
Addition of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine to the fungus Penicillium variabile HXQ-H-1, isolated from the mangrove rhizosphere soil collected on the coast of Fujian Province, China, led to alteration of the fungal metabolome, yielding a highly modified fatty acid amide, varitatin A (113) (Figure 16) [52]. Interestingly, 113 exhibited activity against the HCT-116 cell line with an IC50 value of 2.8 μM. Moreover, it inhibited 50% and 40% of the protein tyrosine kinases PDGFR-β and ErbB4, respectively, at a concentration of 1 μM, suggesting that the cytotoxicity of 113 is probably exerted due to its protein kinase inhibitory activity. Subsequent mixed fermentation of this mangrove fungal strain with the deep-sea-derived fungus Talaromyces aculeatus (collected at a depth of 3386 m, Indian Ocean) afforded four novel polyketides, penitalarins A–C, containing an unusual 3,6-dioxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane, in addition to nafuredins A and B (114) (Figure 16), which were not detected in the axenic fungal cultures under the same conditions [53]. Compound 114 showed cytotoxicity against a panel of human cancer cell lines (HeLa, K562, HCT-116, HL-60, A549, and MCF-7), with IC50 values in the range from 1.2 to 9.8 μM, whereas penitalarins A–C and nafuredin A proved to be inactive.
In 2009, a study on the chemical constituents of the solid-phase culture of the fungus Aspergillus ustus 094102 (from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza collected in Hainan Province, China) afforded a series of cytotoxic drimane sesqui- and meroterpenoids [54]. To further investigate the biosynthetic capacity of A. ustus, this fungus was cultured in both liquid and on solid media to obtain extracts enriched with ophiobolin derivatives. Eventually, the chromatographic work-up of both extracts yielded seven new and eleven known ophiobolin congeners [55]. Interestingly, ophiobolins were only produced during static cultivation, but not in the shaking mode. In addition, the metabolic profile of liquid cultivation under static condition was investigated at different times/days; however, no significant effect on the production of ophiobolins was found. Compounds 115124 (Figure 17) showed cytotoxicity against the human gemcitabine-resistant G3K (pancreatic cancer) cell line, MCF-7, MD-MBA-231 (triple-negative breast cancer) cells, MCF-7/Adr (adriamycin-resistant human breast cancer) cell line, MCF-10A (nontumorigenic breast epithelial cell line), A549, and HL-60 cells, with IC50 values in the range from 0.6 to 9.5 μM. Among the tested compounds, 21-epi-ophiobolin O (121) was found to be the most active analog, with IC50 values of 0.6 and 0.8 μM toward the A549 and HL-60 cell lines, respectively, thus suggesting that the 2,5-dimethoxyl-2H,3H,5H-furan moiety is a key structural feature for cytotoxicity against the tested cell lines [55]. It should be noted that ophiobolin O (122) has previously been shown to induce cell apoptosis in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways [56]. Moreover, inverse docking analysis suggested that 122 could bind to glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β), which is an upstream regulator of G1 phase [57]. Accordingly, it was shown that GSK3β knocked-down MCF-7 cells were not sensitive to ophiobolin O (122) treatment, indicating that the latter may target GSK3β to induce G1 phase arrest in MCF-7 cells. In addition, 122 treatment resulted in decreased phosphorylation levels of AKT (protein kinase B) and GSK3β, as well as in the protein expression level of cyclin D1, whereas pre-treatment with phosphatase inhibitor sodium orthovanadate blocked 122-induced G1 phase arrest. These results indicated that the anti-proliferative effect of 122 in MCF-7 cells may be mediated through interaction with the Akt/GSK3β/cyclin D1 pathway. Besides, 122 suppressed tumorigenesis in a mouse xenograft model, whereas it showed no apparent cytotoxicity [57]. Furthermore, 122 significantly reversed adriamycin resistance in human breast cancer MCF-7/ADR cells (11-fold) at low micromolar concentrations (0.1 μM; less than 20% inhibition concentration) [57]. The reversal effect of 122 was suggested to be via elevated expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, as well as downregulation of resistance-related proteins, especially of P-glycoprotein, in MCF-7/ADR cells. Moreover, 122 enhanced mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and G2/M cell cycle arrest caused by adriamycin, due to increased level of ROS in MCF-7/ADR cells [58]. Remarkably, combination treatment of 122 and adriamycin resulted in significant tumor growth suppression (70%) in nude mice, suggesting 122 as a promising lead structure for multidrug resistance cancer chemotherapy.

2.2.2. Compounds with Lipid-Lowering Activity

Chromatographic work-up of sediment-derived Penicillium pinophilum H608 (collected from the Xiamen coastline, China) extract resulted in isolation of a series of phenolic compounds, which were evaluated for their inhibitory effects against oleic acid-elicited lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells [59]. As a result of this bioactivity screening, eight compounds (125132) (Figure 18) were found to inhibit lipid accumulation at a dose of 10 μM, with no significant cytotoxicity (IC50 > 50 μM). Further investigation revealed five compounds (125, 128, and 130132) that significantly suppressed intracellular total cholesterol and triglycerides. Remarkably, the analogs 125, 130132 were more active than the positive control simvastatin. A real-time quantitative PCR experiment indicated that compounds 125, 128, and 130132 affect the genes responsible for enzymes involved in lipid metabolism, including downregulation of the expression of fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (inhibition of lipogenesis), as well as upregulation of carnitinepalmitoyl transferase-1 (stimulation of lipid catabolism). Moreover, metabolites 125, 127, 128, and 130133 reduced oxidized low-density lipoprotein stimulated lipid accumulation in RAW264.7 cells. Among the active derivatives in the latter assay, compounds 125 and 132 revealed the most pronounced effect comparable to the positive control rosiglitazone at a dose of 10 μM. Further bioassays showed that compounds 125, 128, and 131133 significantly decreased the intracellular total cholesterol levels, although congeners 127 and 130 were inactive in RAW264.7 macrophages. Further mechanistic studies revealed that compounds 128 and 131133 significantly inhibited cholesterol uptake in RAW264.7, whereas 125 and 131133 stimulated cholesterol efflux to HDL. Compounds 125 and 132 showed a cholesterol efflux effect comparable to rosiglitazone and caused upregulation of mRNA levels of key regulators, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), liver X receptor α (LXRα), and ATP-binding cassette G1 (ABCG1). Similarly, compounds 131 and 133 showed significant inhibition of cholesterol influx, which was slightly weaker than that of rosiglitazone, as well as stimulation of cholesterol efflux. However, both compounds did not affect transcription of the aforementioned cholesterol efflux stimulators, suggesting an unknown mechanism of the action for regulation of cholesterol efflux. Furthermore, congeners 131133 decreased CD36 and SR-1 (critical scavenger receptors for regulation of cholesterol dynamics) transcription [59]. Thus, the aforementioned phenolic compounds represent new natural product leads that can be utilized for the development of hypolipidemic and anti-atherosclerotic agents (Figure 18).

2.3. Cytotoxic Compounds Derived from Bacteria Originating from Mangrove (Rhizosphere) Soil/Sediment Samples

The culture broth of the actinomycete strain Streptomyces sp. 219807 derived from mangrove soil collected in Hainan Province, China, revealed a remarkably high yield of glycosylated 16-membered macrolide derivatives belonging to the elaiophylin family [60]. Specifically, Streptomyces sp. 219807 was cultured on 18 different media, and was shown to produce the highest yield of elaiophylin (up to 4486 mg/L) in shake-flasks containing DO fermentation medium. The high yield of elaiophylin was attributed to both the strain of microorganism and the DO medium containing complex carbon sources. Subsequent chemical investigation of the respective fermentation extract afforded a new elaiophylin metabolite, halichoblelide D (134), along with several known analogs (135140). Compounds 134140 exhibited potent cytotoxicity against HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines, with IC50 values in the range from 0.19 to 2.12 μM, which renders them promising lead structures for the development of anticancer agents (Figure 19).
Bioassay-guided investigation of the mangrove-derived actinomycete Streptomyces sp. Q22, isolated from a sample of mangrove soil (Guangdong, China), afforded eight natural products, including the known bagremycin B (141) and a new derivative bagremycin C (142) that showed cytotoxic properties (Figure 20) [61]. Compound 142 was found to be the most active analog against four human glioma cells, with IC50 values ranging between 2.2 and 6.4 μM, followed by 141, with IC50 values from 7.3 to 13.3 μM, thus indicating that the N-acetyl-(S)-cysteine moiety plays an important role in the cytotoxicity of these metabolites. Interestingly, bagremycin C (142) at concentrations of 2.2 and 4.4 μM was found to induce late apoptosis (after 48 and 72h) in U87MG cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, a U87MG cell cycle assay showed that the cell population at the G0/G1 phase was enhanced after 12 h of exposure to 4.4 μM bagremycin C (142), indicating that the latter might block the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase.
In 2013 and 2015, the Streptomyces sp. strain CHQ-64, obtained from rhizosphere soil collected from the mangrove conservation area of Guangdong province, China, was reported to be a source of intriguing natural products [62,63]. Chemical investigation of the crude extract of this actinomycete led to the isolation of hybrid isoprenoids (indotertines A and B, and drimentines C and H) as well as skipped-polyol polyene macrolides (reedsmycins A–F) with unprecedented scaffolds [62,63]. In a subsequent study, a mutant strain ΔrdmF of Streptomyces sp. CHQ-64 was obtained by knockout of the regulatory gene rdmF involved in reedsmycins biosynthesis [64]. Chemical investigation of the ΔrdmF mutant strain afforded an unusual 2,3,4-trisubstituted pyrrole, namely geranylpyrrol A, along with a new alkaloid piericidin F (143). Interestingly, the latter exhibited pronounced activity toward HeLa, NB4 (acute promyelocytic leukemia), A549, and H1975 cell lines, with IC50 values in the range between 0.003 to 0.56 μM, whereas geranylpyrrol A was inactive (Figure 21).
Hayakawa et al., in the course of screening for antitumor compounds using 3Y1 rat fibroblasts transformed with adenovirus oncogenes, reported a novel N-acylated undecapeptide, thioviridamide, from the culture broth of the actinomycete Streptomyces olivoviridis [65]. Remarkably, thioviridamide showed selective cytotoxicity against 3Y1 rat fibroblast cells transformed with adenovirus type 12 (Ad12-3Y1) and adenovirus E1A gene (E1A-3Y1), with IC50 values of 2.3 nM (3.9 ng/mL) and 23.8 nM (32 ng/mL), respectively. Significant numbers of Ad12-3Y1 cells treated with thioviridamide contained condensed chromatin and fragmented nuclei, indicating that thioviridamide induced apoptosis. In a subsequent study, the gene cluster for the biosynthesis of thioviridamide in S. olivoriridis NA05001 was identified and heterologously produced in Streptomyces lividans TK23 [66]. In addition, during genome mining for thioviridamide-like biosynthetic gene clusters, a novel cryptic biosynthetic gene cluster was identified from Streptomyces sp. MSB090213SC12 strain, obtained from mangrove soil in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan. In order to induce the expression of the cryptic metabolite, various fermentation media were employed, including the production medium for thioviridamide. However, this proved to be unsuccessful for the production of the novel analog. Nevertheless, heterologous expression of the respective biosynthetic gene cluster in Streptomyces avermitilis SUKA22 strain resulted in the production of the new derivative neothioviridamide (144) possessing four thioamide bonds and the unusual amino acids β-hydroxy-N1,N3-dimethylhistidinium (hdmHis) and 3-methyl-S-(2-aminovinyl)cysteine (3-Me-avCys) [67]. Interestingly, neothioviridamide (144) displayed cytotoxic activities against SKOV-3 (human ovarian adenocarcinoma), Meso-1 (malignant pleural mesothelioma), and Jurkat cells with IC50 values of 2.1, 0.7, and 0.4 μM, respectively (Figure 22).
Sun et al. reported the isolation of four new macrolactone polyketide natural products of the borrelidin family, namely, borrelidin F (146), borrelidin G (147), borrelidin H (148), and borrelidin I, in addition to the known analogue borrelidin A (145) (Figure 23) [68]. These metabolites were obtained from Streptomyces rochei SCSIO ZJ89, which was originated from a mangrove-derived sediment sample collected in Yalongwan, China. All compounds were investigated for cytotoxicity against A549, CNE2 (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cell lines, as well as against normal hepatic L02 and normal umbilical vein endothelial Huvec-12 cells. Compounds 145148 were active toward the respective cell lines, with IC50 values in the range from 0.12 to 22.75 μM. Among them, compounds 145 and 148 were the most active with IC50 values between 0.12 and 2.19 μM, stronger than those of the positive controls doxorubicin (IC50 = 1.02–3.52 μM) and cisplatin (IC50 = 2.30–12.85 μM). However, compound 148 was found to be less active toward the non-cancerous cell lines than 145, which might be attributed to both the α-OH configuration and cis geometry of the C14–C15 olefin in its structure compared to the latter. Due to its selectivity toward cancer cells, 148 was further investigated on tumor cell migration, employing an in vitro wound-healing assay. Remarkably, 148 effectively inhibited tumor (HeLa and A549) cell migration, even at low micromolar concentrations (1/2 IC50). Moreover, it exerted little influence upon non-malignant human umbilical vein endothelial (Huvec-12) cells, which renders 148 a potential new antitumor lead compound with both cytotoxic and antimetastatic properties. Interestingly, the known analog borrelidin A (145) has been reported to be an allosteric inhibitor of threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), thus preventing normal protein synthesis [69]. Moreover, its cytotoxic effect is associated with induction of G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and caspase-mediated cell death via the MAPK signaling pathway [70]. Interestingly, in a recent study, 145 was shown to increase the levels of unfolded protein response (UPR) associated with ER stress, leading to C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP)-dependent cell death in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells [71]. Therefore, 148 might exert similar mechanisms for selectively targeting cancer cells.
Further bioactive metabolites derived from mangrove soil/sediment microorganisms that could serve as potential lead structures are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 24.

3. Conclusions and Outlook

Mangrove-associated microorganisms have gained considerable attention as a rich source of structurally diverse secondary metabolites with pronounced biological activities, which could be utilized in the discovery of new drug leads [79]. In this review, 163 compounds have been presented from mangrove-associated microorganisms, the majority of which show remarkable activities, such as the potent cytotoxic penicisulfuranols A–C (100102) [48], phomoxanthone A (19) [32], and piericidin F (143) [64], as well as the anti-inflammatory rhytidenones C and D (40 and 41) [34]. Nevertheless, these metabolites represent only a small fraction of the biosynthetic capacity of the source microorganisms, as predicted through genomic studies [80]. This is partially due to the fact that most of the biosynthetic gene clusters expressing novel bioactive metabolites remain silent (or cryptic) under standard laboratory culture conditions, and thus the metabolic potential of these microorganisms remains untapped [81,82]. Taking this fact into account, new methods and technologies are warranted to activate cryptic pathways and explore the secondary metabolome of microbes [83].
The biosynthetic potential of mangrove-associated microorganisms has been associated with activation of silent genes by unique environmental stimuli imparted on this special ecological niche [84]. Thus, production of cryptic metabolites may be accomplished by altering culture conditions, such as temperature, media, pH, and light, or by adding elicitors/chemicals, e.g., DMSO, inorganic salts, and plant exudates—in the case of endophytes—to the culture [79,82]. Alteration of culture conditions, the so-called OSMAC approach, has been successfully exploited to generate novel compounds from mangrove-associated fungi, such as brocapyrrozin A (25) and lasiodiplactone A (42) from the endophytic fungi P. brocae MA-231 [26] and L. theobromae ZJ-HQ1 [35], respectively.
Co-cultivation of microorganisms has likewise been exploited to enhance the accumulation of constitutively present natural products and/or to trigger the production of cryptic metabolites [85], which could not be achieved though fermentation of individual strains. It is assumed that microbial interactions imitate the natural habitat of microbes, either in a symbiotic relationship or in competition for nutrients and space, and thus play an important role in the activation of silent genes [84]. This methodology has led to the induction of several novel cryptic metabolites, including citrifelins A (68) and B (69) from co-culture of the mangrove endophyte P. citrinum MA-197 with the bryozoan-derived B. felina EN-135 [42], as well as microsphaeropsisin C (75) and lasiodiplodin derivatives (7679) with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity from co-culture of the endophytic fungus Trichoderma sp. 307 with A. johnsonii B2 [44].
In the last few years, epigenetic manipulation has attracted great interest as a strategy for activation of silent biosynthetic pathways. Several regulatory proteins, such as chromatin-modulating agents and transcription factors, are known to control the secondary metabolome of microbes [84]. The epigenetic modifiers suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and 5-azacytidine that inhibit the activities of histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases, respectively, have proven to be effective in activation of silenced gene clusters [83,84]. For instance, addition of 5-azacytidine to the mangrove-associated fungus P. variabile HXQ-H-1 afforded the cryptic metabolite varitatin A (113) with potent cytotoxic and protein kinase inhibitory activities [52]. Notably, it has been shown that secondary metabolite production in Aspergillus nidulans was triggered by co-cultivation with the bacterium Streptomyces rapamycinicus due to targeted histone modification, thus shedding light on the connection between epigenetic modification and microbial crosstalk [86].
The majority of compounds described in this review have been derived from common genera, such as Streptomyces and Penicillium. Even though these microorganisms still hold enormous biosynthetic potential, as demonstrated by recent genome sequence studies, a vast amount of novel fungal and/or bacterial taxonomic groups still lies unexplored [79]. To a large extent, this is due to limitations in traditional isolation procedures, as well as the non-culturable feature of many of these latter microorganisms [87]. To overcome this problem, molecular approaches, such as high-throughput sequencing and metagenomics, have become promising tools for unraveling the biosynthetic potential of hitherto uncultured microorganisms, evading the need for isolation of individual species [87,88], and thus providing an inexhaustible source of new microbial taxa. Genome mining and bioinformatics approaches also serve as powerful strategies towards the prediction of key biosynthetic clusters from genome sequence analysis data, providing a wealth of information that can be linked to cryptic secondary metabolites, as exemplified in the case of neothioviridamide (144) from Streptomyces sp. MSB090213SC12 [67,89,90]. These novel biosynthetic clusters can be genetically engineered and expressed in heterologous hosts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, E. coli, or Streptomyces lividans for large-scale production of the desired lead compounds or derivatives thereof [66,91,92].
Overall, mangrove-associated microorganisms have gained considerable attention due to their unique ecological characteristics, diversity, and wealth of novel bioactive secondary metabolites. Nevertheless, pharmaceutical development of these metabolites is still in its infancy, with only the proteasome inhibitor, salinosporamide A, being hitherto in phase I clinical trials for the treatment of multiple myeloma [12,93]. In order to unravel the metabolic potential of mangrove endophytes, an integrative understanding of the principal molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of natural product biogenesis is essential [88]. Strategies to activate silent genes for exploration of novel compounds, such as epigenetic modification, OSMAC, and microbial co-cultivation approaches, along with continuing advancements in modern “omics” methodologies, including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, is expected to open up an exciting area of research for the discovery of lead compounds from mangrove-associated microorganisms in the coming years.

Funding

This research was funded by the DFG (GRK 2158) and by the Manchot Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tomlinson, P.B. Ecology. In The Botany of Mangroves, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 11–28. ISBN 9781107080676. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu, J.; Xiao, Q.; Xu, J.; Li, M.-Y.; Pan, J.-Y.; Yang, M.-H. Natural products from true mangrove flora: Source, chemistry and bioactivities. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 955–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saenger, P. Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 11–47. ISBN 9789401599627. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, L.; Mu, M.; Li, X.; Lin, P.; Wang, W. Differentiation between true mangroves and mangrove associates based on leaf traits and salt contents. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 4, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yin, S.; Fan, C.-Q.; Wang, X.-N.; Lin, L.-P.; Ding, J.; Yue, J.-M. Xylogranatins A−D:  Novel tetranortriterpenoids with an unusual 9,10-seco scaffold from marine mangrove Xylocarpus granatum. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4935–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, W.S.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Satyanandamurty, T.; Shen, L.; Bringmann, G. Krishnadimer A, an axially chiral non-biaryl natural product: Discovery and biomimetic synthesis. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gong, K.-K.; Li, P.-L.; Qiao, D.; Zhang, X.-W.; Chu, M.-J.; Qin, G.-F.; Tang, X.-L.; Li, G.-Q. Cytotoxic and antiviral triterpenoids from the mangrove plant Sonneratia paracaseolaris. Molecules 2017, 22, e1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Q.; Satyanandamurty, T.; Shen, L.; Wu, J. Krishnolides A–D: New 2-ketokhayanolides from the Krishna mangrove, Xylocarpus moluccensis. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, e333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, J.; Li, M.-Y.; Bruhn, T.; Katele, F.Z.; Xiao, Q.; Pedpradab, P.; Wu, J.; Bringmann, G. Thaixylomolins A–C: Limonoids featuring two new motifs from the Thai Xylocarpus moluccensis. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3682–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fei, Y.; Li, X.-W.; Guo, Y.-W. Recent progress on the mangrove plants: Chemistry and bioactivity. Curr. Org. Chem. 2016, 20, 1923–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, Y.; Wu, X.; Feng, S.; Jiang, G.; Luo, J.; Zhou, S.; Vrijmoed, L.L.P.; Jones, E.B.G.; Krohn, K.; Steingröver, K.; et al. Five unique compounds:  Xyloketals from mangrove fungus Xylaria sp. from the South China Sea coast. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6252–6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Feling, R.H.; Buchanan, G.O.; Mincer, T.J.; Kauffman, C.A.; Jensen, P.R.; Fenical, W. Salinosporamide A: A highly cytotoxic proteasome inhibitor from a novel microbial source, a marine bacterium of the new genus Salinospora. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 355–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. MarinLit. Available online: http://pubs.rsc.org/marinlit (accessed on 25 April 2018).
  14. Blunt, J.W.; Carroll, A.R.; Copp, B.R.; Davis, R.A.; Keyzers, R.A.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 8–53, (and all papers of the same series prior to this). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Simões, M.F.; Antunes, A.; Ottoni, C.A.; Amini, M.S.; Alam, I.; Alzubaidy, H.; Mokhtar, N.-A.; Archer, J.A.C.; Bajic, V.B. Soil and rhizosphere associated fungi in gray mangroves (Avicennia marina) from the Red Sea—A metagenomic approach. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2015, 13, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sanka Loganathachetti, D.; Poosakkannu, A.; Muthuraman, S. Fungal community assemblage of different soil compartments in mangrove ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, e8560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mendes, L.; Tsai, S. Variations of bacterial community structure and composition in mangrove sediment at different depths in Southeastern Brazil. Diversity 2014, 6, e827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Basak, P.; Pramanik, A.; Sengupta, S.; Nag, S.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Roy, D.; Pattanayak, R.; Ghosh, A.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Bhattacharyya, M. Bacterial diversity assessment of pristine mangrove microbial community from Dhulibhashani, Sundarbans using 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing. Genom. Data 2016, 7, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liang, J.-B.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Lan, C.-Y.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Zan, Q.-J.; Huang, L.-N. Recovery of novel bacterial diversity from mangrove sediment. Mar. Biol. 2007, 150, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Souza Sebastianes, F.L.; Romão-Dumaresq, A.S.; Lacava, P.T.; Harakava, R.; Azevedo, J.L.; de Melo, I.S.; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A. Species diversity of culturable endophytic fungi from Brazilian mangrove forests. Curr. Genet. 2013, 59, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xu, D.-B.; Ye, W.-W.; Han, Y.; Deng, Z.-X.; Hong, K. Natural products from mangrove actinomycetes. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2590–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, J. Bioactive natural products derived from mangrove-associated microbes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 841–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, L.-H.; Li, X.-M.; Lv, C.-T.; Huang, C.-G.; Wang, B.-G. Brocazines A–F, cytotoxic bisthiodiketopiperazine derivatives from Penicillium brocae MA-231, an endophytic fungus derived from the marine mangrove plant Avicennia marina. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1921–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Meng, L.-H.; Wang, C.-Y.; Mándi, A.; Li, X.-M.; Hu, X.-Y.; Kassack, M.U.; Kurtán, T.; Wang, B.-G. Three diketopiperazine alkaloids with spirocyclic skeletons and one bisthiodiketopiperazine derivative from the mangrove-derived endophytic fungus Penicillium brocae MA-231. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 5304–5307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meng, L.-H.; Zhang, P.; Li, X.-M.; Wang, B.-G. Penicibrocazines A–E, five new sulfide diketopiperazines from the marine-derived endophytic fungus Penicillium brocae. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Meng, L.-H.; Li, X.-M.; Liu, Y.; Xu, G.-M.; Wang, B.-G. Antimicrobial alkaloids produced by the mangrove endophyte Penicillium brocae MA-231 using the OSMAC approach. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 55026–55033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, S.; Chen, D.; Cai, R.; Cui, H.; Long, Y.; Lu, Y.; Li, C.; She, Z. Cytotoxic and antibacterial preussomerins from the mangrove endophytic fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae ZJ-HQ1. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2397–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, Y.; Stuhldreier, F.; Kurtan, T.; Mandi, A.; Arumugam, S.; Lin, W.; Stork, B.; Wesselborg, S.; Weber, H.; Henrich, B.; et al. Daldinone derivatives from the mangrove-derived endophytic fungus Annulohypoxylon sp. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 5381–5393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Siridechakorn, I.; Yue, Z.; Mittraphab, Y.; Lei, X.; Pudhom, K. Identification of spirobisnaphthalene derivatives with anti-tumor activities from the endophytic fungus Rhytidhysteron rufulum AS21B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 2878–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marian, F.; Hendrik, N.; Philip, B.; Björn, S.; Sebastian, W.; Wenhan, L.; Peter, P. Phomoxanthone A—from mangrove forests to anticancer therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 3523–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rönsberg, D.; Debbab, A.; Mándi, A.; Vasylyeva, V.; Böhler, P.; Stork, B.; Engelke, L.; Hamacher, A.; Sawadogo, R.; Diederich, M.; et al. Pro-apoptotic and immunostimulatory tetrahydroxanthone dimers from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis longicolla. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 12409–12425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Böhler, P.; Stuhldreier, F.; Anand, R.; Kondadi, A.K.; Schlutermann, D.; Berleth, N.; Deitersen, J.; Wallot-Hieke, N.; Wu, W.; Frank, M.; et al. The mycotoxin phomoxanthone A disturbs the form and function of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, e286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, X.-M.; Zheng, C.-J.; Chen, G.-Y.; Song, X.-P.; Han, C.-R.; Li, G.-N.; Fu, Y.-H.; Chen, W.-H.; Niu, Z.-G. Bioactive anthraquinone derivatives from the mangrove-derived fungus Stemphylium sp. 33231. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2021–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pudhom, K.; Teerawatananond, T. Rhytidenones A–F, spirobisnaphthalenes from Rhytidhysteron sp. AS21B, an endophytic fungus. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1962–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, S.; Liu, Z.; Liu, H.; Long, Y.; Chen, D.; Lu, Y.; She, Z. Lasiodiplactone A, a novel lactone from the mangrove endophytic fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae ZJ-HQ1. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 6338–6341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Liu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Xia, G.; Liu, H.; He, L.; She, Z. Bioactive metabolites from mangrove endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp. 16–5B. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3091–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cai, R.; Lu, Y.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Isocoumarins and benzofurans from the mangrove endophytic fungus Talaromyces amestolkiae possess α-glucosidase inhibitory and antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 26412–26420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cui, H.; Lin, Y.; Luo, M.; Lu, Y.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Diaporisoindoles A–C: Three isoprenylisoindole alkaloid derivatives from the mangrove endophytic fungus Diaporthe sp. SYSU-HQ3. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5621–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Z.; Lin, S.; Xia, G.; Xia, X.; Ding, B.; He, L.; Lu, Y.; She, Z. Peniphenones A–D from the mangrove fungus Penicillium dipodomyicola HN4-3A as inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis phosphatase MptpB. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, S.; He, L.; Chen, D.; Cai, R.; Long, Y.; Lu, Y.; She, Z. Talaramide A, an unusual alkaloid from the mangrove endophytic fungus Talaromyces sp. (HZ-YX1) as an inhibitor of mycobacterial PknG. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 4273–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, G.; Zhou, G.; Zhu, M.; Wang, W.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Neosartoryadins A and B, fumiquinazoline alkaloids from a mangrove-derived fungus Neosartorya udagawae HDN13-313. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Meng, L.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.-M.; Xu, G.-M.; Ji, N.-Y.; Wang, B.-G. Citrifelins A and B, citrinin adducts with a tetracyclic framework from cocultures of marine-derived isolates of Penicillium citrinum and Beauveria felina. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 2301–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, Y.; Yang, Q.; Xia, G.; Huang, H.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; Lu, Y.; He, L.; Xia, X.; She, Z. Polyketides with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity from a mangrove endophytic fungus, Penicillium sp. HN29-3B1. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1816–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, L.; Niaz, S.; Khan, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, L. Induction of diverse bioactive secondary metabolites from the mangrove endophytic fungus Trichoderma sp. (strain 307) by co-cultivation with Acinetobacter johnsonii (strain B2). Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. El-Elimat, T.; Figueroa, M.; Raja, H.A.; Graf, T.N.; Swanson, S.M.; Falkinham, J.O.; Wani, M.C.; Pearce, C.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Biosynthetically distinct cytotoxic polyketides from Setophoma terrestris. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, S.-S.; Li, X.-M.; Williams, K.; Proksch, P.; Ji, N.-Y.; Wang, B.-G. Rhizovarins A–F, indole-diterpenes from the mangrove-derived endophytic fungus Mucor irregularis QEN-189. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2066–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, S.; Dai, H.; Makhloufi, G.; Heering, C.; Janiak, C.; Hartmann, R.; Mándi, A.; Kurtán, T.; Müller, W.E.G.; Kassack, M.U.; et al. Cytotoxic 14-membered macrolides from a mangrove-derived endophytic fungus, Pestalotiopsis microspora. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2332–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhu, M.; Zhang, X.; Feng, H.; Dai, J.; Li, J.; Che, Q.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D. Penicisulfuranols A–F, alkaloids from the mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium janthinellum HDN13-309. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zheng, C.-J.; Bai, M.; Zhou, X.-M.; Huang, G.-L.; Shao, T.-M.; Luo, Y.-P.; Niu, Z.-G.; Niu, Y.-Y.; Chen, G.-Y.; Han, C.-R. Cytotoxic indole diterpenes from the mangrove-derived fungus Eupenicillium sp. HJ002. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Luo, X.; Lin, X.; Tao, H.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y. Isochromophilones A–F, cytotoxic chloroazaphilones from the marine mangrove endophytic fungus Diaporthe sp. SCSIO 41011. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wu, G.; Yu, G.; Kurtán, T.; Mándi, A.; Peng, J.; Mo, X.; Liu, M.; Li, H.; Sun, X.; Li, J.; et al. Cytotoxic xanthone–chromanone dimers from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor HDN1009. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 2691–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Varitatin A, a highly modified fatty acid amide from Penicillium variabile cultured with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 2841–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, G.; Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Inducing secondary metabolite production by combined culture of Talaromyces aculeatus and Penicillium variabile. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 3167–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Miao, C.; Liu, P.; Hong, K.; Zhu, W. Sesquiterpenoids and benzofuranoids from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus ustus 094102. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1761–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, T.; Lu, Z.; Fan, J.; Wang, L.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Hong, K.; Piyachaturawat, P.; Chairoungdua, A.; et al. Ophiobolins from the mangrove fungus Aspergillus ustus. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, T.; Lu, Z.; Meng, L.; Wei, S.; Hong, K.; Zhu, W.; Huang, C. The novel agent ophiobolin O induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of MCF-7 cells through activation of MAPK signaling pathways. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lv, C.; Qin, W.; Zhu, T.; Wei, S.; Hong, K.; Zhu, W.; Chen, R.; Huang, C. Ophiobolin O isolated from Aspergillus ustus induces G1 arrest of MCF-7 cells through interaction with AKT/GSK3β/Cyclin D1 signaling. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sun, W.; Lv, C.; Zhu, T.; Yang, X.; Wei, S.; Sun, J.; Hong, K.; Zhu, W.; Huang, C. Ophiobolin O reverses adriamycin resistance via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis sensitization in adriamycin-resistant human breast carcinoma (MCF-7/ADR) cells. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 4570–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, R.; Liu, D.; Liu, M.; Proksch, P.; Guo, P.; Lin, W. Phenolic metabolites from mangrove-associated Penicillium pinophilum fungus with lipid-lowering effects. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21969–21978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, Y.; Tian, E.; Xu, D.; Ma, M.; Deng, Z.; Hong, K. Halichoblelide D, a new elaiophylin derivative with potent cytotoxic activity from mangrove-derived Streptomyces sp. 219807. Molecules 2016, 21, e970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, L.; Chai, W.; Wang, W.; Song, T.; Lian, X.-Y.; Zhang, Z. Cytotoxic bagremycins from mangrove-derived Streptomyces sp. Q22. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1450–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Keyzers, R.A.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Polycyclic hybrid isoprenoids from a reed rhizosphere soil derived Streptomyces sp. CHQ-64. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Che, Q.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Yao, T.; Li, J.; Gu, Q.; Li, D.; Li, W.; Zhu, T. Genome scanning inspired isolation of reedsmycins A–F, polyene-polyol macrolides from Streptomyces sp. CHQ-64. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 22777–22782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Han, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, W.; Che, Q.; Li, D. Geranylpyrrol A and piericidin F from Streptomyces sp. CHQ-64 ΔrdmF. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1684–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hayakawa, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Nagai, K.; Shin-ya, K.; Furihata, K. Structure of thioviridamide, a novel apoptosis inducer from Streptomyces olivoviridis. J. Antibiot. 2006, 59, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Izawa, M.; Kawasaki, T.; Hayakawa, Y. Cloning and heterologous expression of the thioviridamide biosynthesis gene cluster from Streptomyces olivoviridis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 7110–7113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kawahara, T.; Izumikawa, M.; Kozone, I.; Hashimoto, J.; Kagaya, N.; Koiwai, H.; Komatsu, M.; Fujie, M.; Sato, N.; Ikeda, H.; et al. Neothioviridamide, a polythioamide compound produced by heterologous expression of a Streptomyces sp. Cryptic RiPP biosynthetic gene cluster. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sun, J.; Shao, J.; Sun, C.; Song, Y.; Li, Q.; Lu, L.; Hu, Y.; Gui, C.; Zhang, H.; Ju, J.; et al. Cytotoxic and cell migration inhibiting agents from mangrove-derived Streptomyces rochei SCSIO ZJ89. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 1488–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ruan, B.; Bovee, M.L.; Sacher, M.; Stathopoulos, C.; Poralla, K.; Francklyn, C.S.; Söll, D. A unique hydrophobic cluster near the active site contributes to differences in borrelidin inhibition among threonyl-tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Han, L.; Chen, X.; Hu, C.; Su, H.; Mu, Y.; Guan, P.; Huang, X. Effect of borrelidin on hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 44401–44409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Sidhu, A.; Miller, J.R.; Tripathi, A.; Garshott, D.M.; Brownell, A.L.; Chiego, D.J.; Arevang, C.; Zeng, Q.; Jackson, L.C.; Bechler, S.A.; et al. Borrelidin induces the unfolded protein response in oral cancer cells and chop-dependent apoptosis. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1122–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Meng, L.-H.; Li, X.-M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.-G. Penicibilaenes A and B, sesquiterpenes with a tricyclo[6.3.1.01,5]dodecane skeleton from the marine isolate of Penicillium bilaiae MA-267. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 6052–6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Xu, R.; Li, X.-M.; Wang, B.-G. Penicisimpins A–C, three new dihydroisocoumarins from Penicillium simplicissimum MA-332, a marine fungus derived from the rhizosphere of the mangrove plant Bruguiera sexangula var. rhynchopetala. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 17, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, H.-L.; Xu, R.; Li, X.-M.; Yang, S.-Q.; Meng, L.-H.; Wang, B.-G. Simpterpenoid A, a meroterpenoid with a highly functionalized cyclohexadiene moiety featuring gem-propane-1,2-dione and methylformate groups, from the mangrove-derived Penicillium simplicissimum MA-332. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1465–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, M.; Shen, N.-X.; Chen, Z.-Q.; Zhang, F.-M.; Chen, Y. Penicilones A–D, anti-MRSA azaphilones from the marine-derived fungus Penicillium janthinellum HK1-6. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Meng, L.-H.; Du, F.-Y.; Li, X.-M.; Pedpradab, P.; Xu, G.-M.; Wang, B.-G. Rubrumazines A–C, indolediketopiperazines of the isoechinulin class from Eurotium rubrum MA-150, a fungus obtained from marine mangrove-derived rhizospheric soil. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Guo, W.; Li, D.; Peng, J.; Zhu, T.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Penicitols A–C and penixanacid A from the mangrove-derived Penicillium chrysogenum HDN11-24. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fu, P.; MacMillan, J.B. Thiasporines A–C, thiazine and thiazole derivatives from a marine-derived Actinomycetospora chlora. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Schneider, P.; Misiek, M.; Hoffmeister, D. In vivo and in vitro production options for fungal secondary metabolites. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zhang, H.W.; Song, Y.C.; Tan, R.X. Biology and chemistry of endophytes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 753–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ludwig-Müller, J. Plants and endophytes: Equal partners in secondary metabolite production? Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 37, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Katz, L.; Baltz, R.H. Natural product discovery: Past, present, and future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tan, R.X.; Zou, W.X. Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Deepika, V.B.; Murali, T.S.; Satyamoorthy, K. Modulation of genetic clusters for synthesis of bioactive molecules in fungal endophytes: A review. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 182, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Daletos, G.; Ebrahim, W.; Ancheeva, E.; El-Neketi, M.; Lin, WH.; Proksch, P. Microbial co-culture and OSMAC approach as strategies to induce cryptic fungal biogenetic gene clusters. In Chemical Biology of Natural Products; Grothaus, P., Cragg, G.M., Newman, D.J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 233–284. ISBN 9781439841945. [Google Scholar]
  86. Nützmann, H.-W.; Reyes-Dominguez, Y.; Scherlach, K.; Schroeckh, V.; Horn, F.; Gacek, A.; Schümann, J.; Hertweck, C.; Strauss, J.; Brakhage, A.A. Bacteria-induced natural product formation in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans requires Saga/Ada-mediated histone acetylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14282–14287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Vasundhara, M.; Kumar, A.; Reddy, M.S. Molecular approaches to screen bioactive compounds from endophytic fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kaul, S.; Sharma, T.; Dhar, M.K. “Omics” tools for better understanding the plant–endophyte interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, e955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ziemert, N.; Alanjary, M.; Weber, T. The evolution of genome mining in microbes—A review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 988–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. van der Lee, T.A.J.; Medema, M.H. Computational strategies for genome-based natural product discovery and engineering in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 89, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pickens, L.B.; Tang, Y.; Chooi, Y.-H. Metabolic engineering for the production of natural products. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2011, 2, 211–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhang, M.M.; Wang, Y.; Ang, E.L.; Zhao, H. Engineering microbial hosts for production of bacterial natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 963–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Spencer, A.; Harrison, S.; Zonder, J.; Badros, A.; Laubach, J.; Bergin, K.; Khot, A.; Zimmerman, T.; Chauhan, D.; Levin, N.; et al. A phase 1 clinical trial evaluating marizomib, pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (NPI-0052-107): Final study results. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 180, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Number of publications describing new and/or bioactive mangrove-associated secondary metabolites covering the period 2007–2017. Source: MarinLit database and series of annual reviews by Blunt et al. in Natural Product Reports [13,14]. Articles on mangrove-associated fungi and bacteria include both ecological groups, plant- and soil-derived microorganisms.
Figure 1. Number of publications describing new and/or bioactive mangrove-associated secondary metabolites covering the period 2007–2017. Source: MarinLit database and series of annual reviews by Blunt et al. in Natural Product Reports [13,14]. Articles on mangrove-associated fungi and bacteria include both ecological groups, plant- and soil-derived microorganisms.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of 15.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of 15.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of 614.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of 614.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structure of 15.
Figure 4. Chemical structure of 15.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structures of 1618.
Figure 5. Chemical structures of 1618.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structure of 19.
Figure 6. Chemical structure of 19.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structures of 2026.
Figure 7. Chemical structures of 2026.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structures of 2739.
Figure 8. Chemical structures of 2739.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g008
Figure 9. Chemical structures of 40 and 41.
Figure 9. Chemical structures of 40 and 41.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structure of 42.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of 42.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structures of 4360.
Figure 11. Chemical structures of 4360.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g011
Figure 12. Chemical structures of 61 and 62.
Figure 12. Chemical structures of 61 and 62.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g012
Figure 13. Chemical structures of compounds with MptpB- (63 and 64), mycobacterial PknG (65), anti-infective (6669) and α-glucosidase (7082) inhibitory activities derived from mangrove endophytic fungi.
Figure 13. Chemical structures of compounds with MptpB- (63 and 64), mycobacterial PknG (65), anti-infective (6669) and α-glucosidase (7082) inhibitory activities derived from mangrove endophytic fungi.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g013
Figure 14. (a) Chemical structures of compounds with cytotoxic activity (8395) derived from mangrove endophytic fungi. (b) Chemical structures of compounds with cytotoxic activity (96105) derived from mangrove endophytic fungi.
Figure 14. (a) Chemical structures of compounds with cytotoxic activity (8395) derived from mangrove endophytic fungi. (b) Chemical structures of compounds with cytotoxic activity (96105) derived from mangrove endophytic fungi.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g014aMarinedrugs 16 00319 g014b
Figure 15. Chemical structures of 106112.
Figure 15. Chemical structures of 106112.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g015
Figure 16. Chemical structures of 113 and 114.
Figure 16. Chemical structures of 113 and 114.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g016
Figure 17. Chemical structures of 115124.
Figure 17. Chemical structures of 115124.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g017
Figure 18. Chemical structures of 125133.
Figure 18. Chemical structures of 125133.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g018
Figure 19. Chemical structures of 134140.
Figure 19. Chemical structures of 134140.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g019
Figure 20. Chemical structures 141 and 142.
Figure 20. Chemical structures 141 and 142.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g020
Figure 21. Chemical structure of 143.
Figure 21. Chemical structure of 143.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g021
Figure 22. Chemical structure of 144.
Figure 22. Chemical structure of 144.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g022
Figure 23. Chemical structures of 145148.
Figure 23. Chemical structures of 145148.
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g023
Figure 24. Chemical structures of bioactive compounds from mangrove fungi and bacteria derived from soil/sediment samples (149163).
Figure 24. Chemical structures of bioactive compounds from mangrove fungi and bacteria derived from soil/sediment samples (149163).
Marinedrugs 16 00319 g024
Table 1. Further bioactive compounds isolated from endophytic fungi (63105) of mangrove origin.
Table 1. Further bioactive compounds isolated from endophytic fungi (63105) of mangrove origin.
Compound NameSourceType of Activity [Ref.]IC50 or MIC Values
Peniphenone B (63)Penicillium dipodomyicola HN4-3A from Acanthus ilicifolius (Hainan Province, China)MptpB inhibitory [39]IC50 0.16 μM
Peniphenone C (64)IC50 1.37 μM
Talaramide A (65)Talaromyces sp. HZ-YX1 from Kandelia obovata (Guangdong Province, China)Mycobacterial serine/threonine protein kinase G (PknG) inhibitory [40]IC50 55 μM,
positive control AX20017 (IC50 = 98 μM) 1
Neosartoryadin A (66)Neosartorya udagawae HDN13-313 from Avicennia marina (Hainan Province, China)Anti-influenza A virus (H1N1) [41]IC50 66 μM;
positive control
ribavirin (IC50 94 μM);
no cytotoxicity
against the human leukemia (HL-60)
cell line
Neosartoryadin B (67)IC50 58 μM;
-//-
Citrifelin A (68)Co-culture of Penicillium citrinum MA-197 (from Lumnitzera racemosa) and Beauveria felina EN-135Antibacterial against E. coli and S. aureus [42]MIC 24.5 μM/8.0 μg/mL (both E. coli and S. aureus)
Citrifelin B (69)MICs 5.6 μM/2.0 μg/mL (E. coli) and 11.2 μM/4.0 μg/mL (S. aureus)
Pinazaphilone A (70)Penicillium sp. HN29-3B1 from Cerbera manghas (Hainan Island, China)α-Glucosidase inhibitory [43]IC50 81.7 μM;
positive control acarbose (IC50 = 446.7 μM)
Pinazaphilone B (71)IC50 28.0 μM;
-//-
6′-Methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3,3′,4′,5-tetraol (72)IC50 2.2 μM;
-//-
Sch 1385568 (73)IC50 16.6 μM;
-//-
(±)-Penifupyrone (74)IC50 14.4 μM;
-//-
Microsphaeropsisin C (75)Co-culture of Trichoderma sp. 307 (from Clerodendrum inerme; Guangdong Province, China) with Acinetobacter johnsonii B2α-Glucosidase inhibitory [44]IC50 188.7 μM;
positive control acarbose (IC50 = 703.8 μM)
(3R,7R)-7-Hydroxy-de-O-methyllasiodiplodin (76)IC50 25.8 μM;
-//-
(3R)-5-Oxo-de-O-methyllasiodiplodin (77)IC50 54.6 μM;
-//-
(3R)-7-Oxo-de-O-methyllasiodiplodin (78)IC50 178.5 μM;
-//-
(3R)-5-Oxolasiodiplodin (79)IC50 176.8 μM;
-//-
(3R,4R)-4-Hydroxy-de-O-methyllasiodiplodin (80)IC50 60.3 μM;
-//-
(3S)-Ozoroalide (81)IC50 198.1 μM;
-//-
(E)-9-Etheno-lasiodiplodin (82)IC50 101.3 μM;
-//-
Secalonic acid A (83)Plant endophyte Setophoma terrestris from a leaf litter collected in a mangrove habitatCytotoxic against MDA-MB-435 (melanoma) and SW-620 (colon cancer) cell lines [45]IC50 0.16 (MDA-MB-435) and 0.41 μM (SW-620)
Penicillixanthone A (84)IC50 0.18 (MDA-MB-435) and 0.21 μM (SW-620)
Blennolide J (85)IC50 4.06 (MDA-MB-435) and 6.14 μM (SW-620)
Hypothemycin (86)IC50 0.58 (MDA-MB-435) and 2.14 μM (SW-620)
Penicillixanthone B (87)IC50 5.20 (MDA-MB-435) and 5.55 μM (SW-620)
Secalonic acid G (88)Cytotoxic against MDA-MB-435 and SW-620 cell lines/antibacterial against M. luteus [45]IC50 3.27 (MDA-MB-435) and 3.67 μM (SW-620)/MIC 7.83 μM (/5 μg/mL)
Rhizovarin A (89)Mucor irregularis QEN-189 from Rhizophora stylosa (Hainan Island, China)Cytotoxic against A549 and/or HL-60 (promyelocytic leukemia) cancer cell lines [46]9.6 μM (HL-60)
Rhizovarin B (90)6.3 (A549) and 5.0 μM (HL-60)
Rhizovarin E (91)9.2 μM (A549)
Penitrem A (92)8.4 (A549) and 7.0 μM (HL-60)
Penitrem C (93)8.0 (A549) and 4.7 μM (HL-60)
Penitrem F (94)8.2 (A549) and 3.3 μM (HL-60)
10β-Hydroxy-13-desoxypaxilline (95)4.6 (A549) and 2.6 μM (HL-60)
7-O-Methylnigrosporolide (96)Pestalotiopsis microspora from Drepanocarpus lunatus (Cameroon)Cytotoxic against L5178Y (murine lymphoma) cell line or human ovarian (A2780) cancer cell line [47]IC50 0.7 μM (L5178Y)
Pestalotioprolide D (97)IC50 5.6 μM (L5178Y)
Pestalotioprolide E (98)IC50 3.4 (L5178Y) and 1.2 μM; (A2780)
Pestalotioprolide F (99)IC50 3.9 μM (L5178Y)
Penicisulfuranol A (100)Penicillium janthinellum HDN13-309 from Sonneratia caseolaris (Hainan Province, China)Cytotoxic against HeLa and HL-60 cell lines [48]IC50 0.5 (HeLa) and 0.1 (HL-60) μM;
Penicisulfuranol B (101)IC50 3.9 (HeLa) and 1.6 μM (HL-60)
Penicisulfuranol C (102)IC50 0.3 (HeLa) and 1.2 μM (HL-60)
Penicilindole A (103)Eupenicillium sp. HJ002 from Xylocarpus granatum (South China Sea)Cytotoxic against A549 and HepG2 cell lines [49]IC50 5.5 (A549) and 1.5 (HepG2) μM
epi-Isochromophilone II (104)Diaporthe sp. SCSIO 41011 from Rhizophora stylosa (Hainan Province, China)Cytotoxic against renal carcinoma cell lines: ACHN, OS-RC-2, and 786-O [50]IC50 4.4 (ACHN), 3.0 (786-O) and 3.9 μM (OS-RC-2)
Isochromophilone D (105)IC50 14 (ACHN), 8.9 (786-O) and 13 μM (OS-RC-2); induced apoptosis (in 786-O cells) in a dose- and time-dependent manner, whereas it did not induce cell cycle arrest at a concentration level up to 10 μM.
1 Positive control is indicated in case the IC50 value of the respective compound is higher than 10 μM.
Table 2. Bioactive compounds isolated from soil-derived fungi (149162) and bacteria (163) of mangrove origin.
Table 2. Bioactive compounds isolated from soil-derived fungi (149162) and bacteria (163) of mangrove origin.
Penicibilaene A (149)Penicillium bilaiae MA-267 from the rhizospheric soil of Lumnitzera racemosa (Hainan Island, China)Antifungal against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides [72]MIC 4.23 μM/1.0 μg/mL
Penicibilaene B (150)MIC 0.45 μM/0.125 μg/mL
Penicisimpin A (151)Penicillium simplicissimum MA-332 from the rhizospheric soil of B. sexangula var. rhynchopetala (Hainan Island, China)Antibacterial and antifungal [73]MIC 15.1 μM/4.0 μg/mL (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus C. gloeosporioides) and 30.3 μM (8 μg/mL) (M. luteus, Vibrio alginolyticus)
MIC 15.1 μM/4.0 μg/mL (C. gloeosporioides)
Penicisimpin C (152)MIC 30.5 μM/8.0 μg/mL (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus)
MIC 30.5 μM (8.0 μg/mL) (C. gloeosporioides)
Simpterpenoid A (153)Influenza neuraminidase inhibitory activity [74]IC50 8.1 nM
Penicilone B (154)Penicillium janthinellum HK1-6, isolated from mangrove rhizosphere soil (Dongzhaigang, Hainan Island)Antibacterial against methicillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, and -susceptible Enterococcus faecium strains [75]MIC 6.54 μM/3.13 μg/mL
Penicilone C (155)MIC 11.8–23.5 μM (6.25–12.5 μg/mL)
Penicilone D (156)MIC 6.1–24.4 μM (3.13–12.5 μg/mL)
Rubrumazine B (157)Eurotium rubrum MA-150 from mangrove-derived rhizospheric soil (Andaman Sea coastline, Thailand)Cytotoxic in brine shrimp assay [76]LD50 2.4 μM
Dehydroechinulin (158)LD50 3.5 μM
Neoechinulin E (159)LD50 3.9 μM
Variecolortide C (160)LD50 9.8 μM
Penicitol A (161)Penicillium chrysogenum HND 11–24 from the rhizosphere soil of Acanthus ilicifoliusCytotoxic against several cancer cell lines and HEK 293 [77]IC50 4.6–7.6 μM; HeLa, HEK 293, HCT-116, and A549 cell lines
Penicitol B (162)IC50 3.4–9.6 μM; HeLa, BEL-7402 (hepatocellular carcinoma), HEK 293, HCT-116, and A549 cell lines
Thiasporine A (163)Actinomycetospora chlora SNC-032 from mangrove swamp sediment sample (Vava’u, Tonga)Cytotoxic toward non-small-cell lung cancer H2122 cell line [78]IC50 5.4 μM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ancheeva, E.; Daletos, G.; Proksch, P. Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090319

AMA Style

Ancheeva E, Daletos G, Proksch P. Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms. Marine Drugs. 2018; 16(9):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ancheeva, Elena, Georgios Daletos, and Peter Proksch. 2018. "Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms" Marine Drugs 16, no. 9: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090319

APA Style

Ancheeva, E., Daletos, G., & Proksch, P. (2018). Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms. Marine Drugs, 16(9), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop