Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness and Safety of Portable Ultrasound-Guided Pharmacopuncture for Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Multi-Center Study
Previous Article in Journal
Switching to Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine in Turkey: Perspectives from People Living with HIV in a Setting of Increasing HIV Incidence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as an Index of Prognosis in Severe COVID-19 Disease

by
Lambros Athanassiou
1,
Ifigenia Kostoglou-Athanassiou
2,*,
Georgia Kaiafa
3,
Sofia Nikolakopoulou
1,
Alexandra Konstantinou
1,
Olga Mascha
4,
Charilaos Samaras
1,
Christos Savopoulos
3,
Yehuda Shoenfeld
5 and
Panagiotis Athanassiou
6
1
COVID-19 Department, Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, 16673 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, 16673 Athens, Greece
3
First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Department of Biochemistry, Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, 55134 Athens, Greece
5
Medical School, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
6
Department of Rheumatology, St. Paul’s Hospital, 55134 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081372
Submission received: 9 June 2025 / Revised: 19 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 29 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology & Public Health)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Euthyroid sick syndrome, or non-thyroidal illness syndrome, has been observed in severely ill patients and has been found to be an index of prognosis. It has been detected in patients with severe infectious diseases, e.g., those with severe COVID-19 infection. Prognostic indicators of the outcome of severe COVID-19 disease are important for the prognosis of individual as well as groups of patients. The aim of this study was to identify euthyroid sick syndrome in patients admitted for severe COVID-19 disease and its relationship to disease severity and outcome. Materials and Methods: In a cohort of patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19 disease, thyroid function in patients requiring hospitalization was evaluated by measuring TSH, FreeT3 (FT3), and FreeT4 (FT4) levels. Patients were classified into four groups: a group with uncompromised respiratory function (pO2 > 70 mmHg, without need of oxygen supplementation) (disease severity 1); a group with mild respiratory insufficiency (pO2 50–60 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with nasal cannula) (disease severity 2); a group with severe respiratory insufficiency (pO2 < 50 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with high flow oxygen) (disease severity 3); and a group with severe respiratory insufficiency requiring intubation (pO2 < 60 mmHg on high flow oxygen supplementation) (disease severity 4). Results: In this cohort, euthyroid sick syndrome was diagnosed in 57.1% of the patients. The presence of euthyroid sick syndrome was related to increased disease severity and adverse disease outcome, i.e., death. FT3 levels were inversely related to CRP levels. Conclusions: Euthyroid sick syndrome may be observed in severe COVID-19 disease and is related to increased disease severity and adverse outcomes. Measurement of thyroid hormones in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 infection may aid in the prognosis of the disease.

1. Introduction

Euthyroid sick syndrome or low T3 or non-thyroidal illness syndrome is a condition induced by severe illness in patients without thyroid or hypothalamic and pituitary disease [1,2]. It reflects an adaptation of the thyroid to severe disease [2]. The condition was first described in the 1970s, as it was observed that thyroid hormone levels dropped during starvation and illness. In a state of mild illness, T3 levels decreased, but as illness duration and severity increased, T4 levels decreased as well. This drop in thyroid hormone levels was observed in a variety of disease states. In contrast to hypothyroidism, decreased peripheral thyroid hormone levels were not followed by an increase in TSH levels. Following these early observations, various studies investigated alterations in thyroid hormone secretion observed during acute illness [3]. However, the exact pathophysiology of euthyroid sick syndrome is still under investigation.
Various mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of euthyroid sick syndrome. Modulation of deiodinase activity—in particular, upregulation of deiodinase type 1 (D1) and type 3 (D3)—leads to decreased production of FT3 and increased production of the inactive compound rT3 [2], respectively [4,5]. Modulation of hypothalamic pituitary secretory activity, i.e., decreased TRH secretion due to higher inhibitory signals or impaired pulsatile TSH, leads to decreased TSH levels. Leptin levels decrease as the illness progresses and lead to decreased TRH secretion and thereby decreased TSH levels [6]. Thyroid hormone binding to transport proteins is modulated and may lead to the profile of euthyroid sick syndrome [2]. Modulated T3 binding to its receptors may also contribute to its pathogenesis [2].
Euthyroid sick syndrome may be observed in various situations and disease states, including cases of starvation [7,8,9], patients in the intensive care unit [3], patients undergoing cardiac operations [10,11], premature infants [3,12], severely ill pediatric and adult patients requiring extracorporeal circulatory support [13], patients with hip fractures [14], patients with acute complications of diabetes mellitus such as diabetic ketoacidosis [15], patients with renal failure [16] as well as severely ill patients suffering from various conditions but not cared for in the intensive care unit [17]. In acute coronary artery disease events as well as in patients under acute care, severe euthyroid sick syndrome may be observed [18,19], and it is considered a prognostic indicator of disease outcome, i.e., survival or death [20].
The secretory activity of the hypothalamic pituitary unit is modulated by circulating inflammatory cytokines during acute illness, leading to the hormone profile of euthyroid sick syndrome. Modulation of deiodinase activity has been considered a major mechanism leading to decreased secretion of T3 and FT3 and augmented secretion of rT3. RT3 is a thyroid hormone product and is deprived of the major actions of thyroid hormones. Modulation of thyroid hormone metabolism during acute disease is also considered another mechanism involved in the pathophysiology of euthyroid sick syndrome. Modulation of the conjugation of circulating thyroid hormones with thyroid binding proteins and albumin is also a mechanism considered to contribute to its pathogenesis [21].
Euthyroid sick syndrome is mainly characterized by the presence of low FT3, which is not accompanied by a compensatory increase in TSH levels but by a decrease. As the underlying disease state deteriorates, low FT4 levels may be observed [22]. These alterations reflect the effect of severe illness on inflammatory mediator secretion which affects the neuroendocrine and endocrine axis [23].
Euthyroid sick syndrome is also observed in infectious diseases [21]. The condition has been previously described in pulmonary tuberculosis [24], in severe meningococcal infection [21], and in human immunodeficiency virus infection [25]. Chow et al. [24] studied a cohort of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and estimated thyroid hormone secretion. They observed euthyroid sick syndrome in 63% of their cohort, and they found that a very low FT3 at presentation was related to subsequent mortality. Post et al. [26] studied endocrine function in active tuberculosis patients and found that 92% of the patients had euthyroid sick syndrome at presentation. Den Brinker et al. [21] studied euthyroid sick syndrome in pediatric patients with meningococcal sepsis. They found that all their pediatric patients with severe meningococcal infection showed alterations in thyroid hormone levels, indicating the diagnosis of non-thyroidal illness syndrome. Altered thyroid hormone levels were inversely related to disease duration and could be due to type 3 deiodinase (D3) induction. In addition, dopamine was found to suppress TSH levels, and T4 and IL-6 levels were predictive of mortality. In the context of COVID-19 infection, euthyroid sick syndrome has been reported [27] and serves as a marker of disease outcome. The relationship between euthyroid sick syndrome and outcomes of death has been described in the literature [20,28,29,30]. It was found to be a marker of adverse outcomes in elderly patients who had undergone surgery for emergency situations [28], in patients with cardiac insufficiency [29], in patients with coronary artery disease [20,30], and in patients with sepsis [31].
The aim of this study was to evaluate thyroid function and investigate euthyroid sick syndrome and its relationship with disease severity and prognosis in a group of patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 infection.

2. Materials and Methods

In a group of 63 patients admitted to the COVID-19 Department of Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, Athens, Greece, over a period of 12 months, from April 2021 to the end of March 2022, for severe COVID-19 infection, TSH, FT3, FT4, and CRP levels were measured. Thyroid hormone measurement was performed upon admission to the COVID-19 Department. Patients underwent evaluation and treatment for severe COVID-19 disease, which was defined as disease requiring hospitalization in the COVID-19 Department. The patients were classified into four groups: a group with uncompromised respiratory function (pO2 > 70 mmHg, without need of oxygen supplementation) (disease severity 1); a group with mild respiratory insufficiency (pO2 50–60 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with nasal cannula) (disease severity 2); a group with severe respiratory insufficiency (pO2 < 50 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with high flow oxygen) (disease severity 3); and a group with severe respiratory insufficiency requiring intubation (pO2 < 60 mmHg on high flow oxygen supplementation, displaying tachypnea and tachycardia) (disease severity 4) (Table 1). Patients had either one, two, or three comorbidities, i.e., arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. Patients who had a history of thyroid disease or were taking medications for the treatment of an underlying thyroid disease were excluded from the study.
TSH, Free T3 (FT3), and Free T4 (FT4) levels were measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay, which is a laboratory method applied to detect analytes in biological fluids by the generation of light via a chemical reaction between specific antibodies and labeled molecules.
TSH levels were assayed in serum by the application of the ARCHITECT TSH immunoassay (Abbott Park IL), a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. The analytical sensitivity of the immunoassay was <0.0025 μIU/mL, the precision was <10%, and the inter-assay coefficient of variation was <20%; normal values were 0.35–4.94 μIU/mL. The assay uses flexible protocols, known as Chemiflex. The assay is based on acridinium labeled conjugate and the detection of relative light units by an optical system.
FT3 levels were assayed by the ARCHITECT FT3 assay (Abbott Park IL). The analytical sensitivity of the immunoassay was <1.0 pg/mL, and the analytical specificity was <0.001%; normal values were 1.58–3.91 pg/mL. The assay is based on acridinium labeled conjugate which is added to the reaction mixture.
FT4 levels were assayed by the ARCHITECT FT4 assay (Abbott Park IL). The analytical sensitivity of the immunoassay was <0.4 ng/dL, and the precision was <10%; normal values were 0.70–1.48 ng/dL. The assay is based on the inverse relationship between the amount of FT4 in the sample and the light units emitted during the reaction and detected by an optical system.
CRP was estimated by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry (CardioPhase hsCRP, Siemens Helathcare Diagnostics, Camerley, UK), a method with a sensitivity and intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 0.175 mg/L with a CV of 7.6% at 0.41 mg/L, 2.7% at 14 mg/L, and 2.0% at 14 mg/L, respectively. Normal values for CRP were <5 mg/L.
The subjects included in the study had no known history of thyroid disease and were not taking any medication for thyroid disease.
Euthyroid disease was diagnosed if patients without a known history of thyroid disease had low FT3 levels in the presence of normal or low TSH levels.
The study was approved by the ethical committee of Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, Athens, Greece (approval number 15335, 24 November 2020). All the patients involved in the study gave their informed consent.
The statistical evaluation of the data generated in the study was performed by SPSS (IBP SPSS Statistics v27). Data are shown as mean ± SD. For the statistical evaluation of qualitative data, a chi square test was performed. For the statistical evaluation of quantitative data, ANOVA and linear regression analysis were performed.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

Patients underwent evaluation and treatment for severe COVID-19 infection (Table 1).

3.2. Identification of Euthyroid Sick Syndrome

Euthyroid sick syndrome, as assessed by low FT3 and normal or low TSH levels, was observed in 36 patients in this cohort (57.1%), while 27 patients did not have such evidence.
Euthyroid sick syndrome was related to adverse outcomes, i.e., non-survival or death, and to disease severity (p < 0.001, chi square test).

3.3. Laboratory Findings

FT3 levels in the group of patients diagnosed with euthyroid sick syndrome (1.59 ± 0.31 pg/mL) were lower compared to patients without evidence of euthyroid sick syndrome (2.26 ± 0.31 pg/mL) (mean ± SD) (p < 0.001, ANOVA) (shown in Figure 1). FT3 levels were lower in male and female patients with COVID-19 infection with euthyroid sick syndrome compared to those without euthyroid sick syndrome (p < 0.001).
FT4 levels were lower in the group of patients with euthyroid sick syndrome (1.07 ± 0.19 ng/dL) as opposed to the patients without euthyroid sick syndrome (1.18 ± 0.18 ng/dL) (mean ± SD, p < 0.05 ANOVA) (Figure 1). FT4 levels were lower in male and female patients with COVID-19 infection with euthyroid sick syndrome as opposed to those without the syndrome (p < 0.05).
TSH levels were lower in the group of patients with euthyroid sick syndrome (1.26 ± 1.68 μIU/mL) as opposed to the patients without euthyroid sick syndrome (1.64 ± 1.8 μIU/mL) (mean ± SD, p < 0.05 ANOVA) (Figure 2). TSH levels were lower in male and female patients with COVID-19 infection with euthyroid sick syndrome as opposed to those without the syndrome (p < 0.05).
FT3 levels were inversely related to CRP levels in patients with severe COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001, beta coefficient of variation —0.34, linear regression analysis) (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Euthyroid sick syndrome or non-thyroidal illness syndrome represents the response of the organism to acute and severe illness [2,3]. In a state of acute illness, a patient may present with reduced levels of T3 and normal or decreased TSH levels. In contrast, plasma rT3 levels increase and plasma T4 levels are low or low–normal. These thyroid hormone alterations are observed in all age groups, ranging from neonatal age and childhood to adulthood and old age [12]. The severity of the underlying condition is correlated with the euthyroid sick syndrome phenotype. Although euthyroid sick syndrome was described many years ago, the pathophysiology of the condition remains incompletely understood. The pathophysiology of euthyroid sick syndrome is multifactorial. In acute disease, thyroid hormones are inactivated peripherally. These changes, which are observed in the circulation, may represent a beneficial adaptation to illness aiming to reduce energy consumption. Peripheral inactivation of thyroid hormones leads to activation of the innate immune response in order to enable survival [32]. In the case of more severe and prolonged illness, in addition to peripheral thyroid hormone changes, the thyroid hormone axis is centrally suppressed, leading to a more severe euthyroid hormone sick phenotype. In severe, critical, and prolonged disease, the presence of a centrally suppressed thyroid hormone axis leads to aggravation of the euthyroid sick syndrome phenotype [33]. Euthyroid sick syndrome is found in patients suffering from infectious diseases and has been observed in ill children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome [34] and severe disease course.
Euthyroid sick syndrome has been observed in patients with COVID-19 virus infection [27]. In a retrospective study performed at the Sheba Medical Center in Israel [35], it was found that, in a cohort of COVID-19 patients, those with FT3 levels in the lower tertile had significantly higher mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for specialized acute care. In a clinical study performed in Changsha, China, non-thyroidal illness syndrome was found to be related to severe disease and inflammatory parameters in COVID-19 disease [27]. In an observational study performed in London, thyroid function was evaluated in patients with COVID-19 infection [36], showing decreased FT4 and TSH levels in comparison to baseline historical levels of the same patients, where available. FT4 and TSH levels increased in the survivors after recovery from the infection. In a retrospective study performed in Lodz, Poland, amongst patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, it was found that euthyroid sick syndrome was related to higher inflammatory indices, longer hospitalization, and the need for oxygen therapy or intubation, as compared to those without euthyroid sick syndrome [37]. In the aforementioned study, mortality was higher in those suffering from euthyroid sick syndrome and <50% of lung parenchymal involvement on computer tomography. In a prospective study of one year duration, performed in Florence, Italy, in patients hospitalized with mild COVID-19 infection, it was found that euthyroid sick syndrome, as depicted by decreased FT3 levels, was independently associated with poor outcome and death [38]. In the aforementioned study, euthyroid sick syndrome was the most frequent thyroid disorder in a population of patients with mild COVID-19 infection and was an index of adverse outcome [38]. In a study performed in Italy, Baldelli et al. [39] evaluated thyroid hormone levels in COVID-19 patients, a group with pneumonia, a group with respiratory distress syndrome, and a group of controls and found significantly decreased FT3 and TSH levels in the patient groups, with lower levels found in the respiratory distress group. In a large retrospective study performed in Kroatia in severe COVID-19 patients, low TSH was observed. Sciacchitano et al. [40] studied patients with COVID-19 infection and hematological malignancies during the initial episodes of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Rome, Italy, and found that low FT3 levels were related with increased neutrophil count, reduced T lymphocyte subpopulations, and augmented inflammation, tissue damage, and coagulation status. In the current study, low FT3 and TSH levels were observed in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. We found that euthyroid sick syndrome in our group of patients was significantly correlated with adverse outcomes, i.e., non-survival or death. In accordance with our findings, Iervasi et al. [41] noted that euthyroid sick syndrome is a strong predictor of death in patients with heart disease. Cerillo et al. [42] also found that low T3 syndrome may be a strong predictor of death in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. We found that, in our group of severe SARS-CoV-2 disease patients, the presence of euthyroid sick syndrome was significantly related to disease severity and adverse outcome.
The pathophysiology of euthyroid sick or non-thyroidal illness syndrome is multifactorial and multifaceted. The thyroid hormone axis is centrally downregulated and induces a decrease in thyroid hormone secretion [43]. Euthyroid sick syndrome may be a manifestation of the acute phase response. Various inflammatory cytokines released during inflammation may alter thyroid secretion and hormone metabolism [44]. In particular, increased circulating interleukin-6 [45] and TNF-α [46], released during the acute phase response, reduce T4 metabolism to T3 leading to the euthyroid sick profile. In SARS-CoV-2 infection, an inflammatory cytokine release syndrome, described as “cytokine storm”, may be observed, which may be related to disease severity and even death [47,48]. The term cytokine storm describes the release of inflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory mediators during an infectious disease and is related to rapid disease progression and mortality [49]. The term was initially applied to describe graft versus host disease during allogeneic stem cell transplantation [47]. Subsequently, the term was further elucidated and applied in various disease states as well as in sepsis [50]. The role of the immune system is to recognize a foreign intruder in the organism and produce an inflammatory response in order to eliminate the foreign and possibly harmful agent. It also supports the repair of any damage induced by the foreign agent and the organism’s return to its initial basal condition. This immune system response is enhanced by cytokines, which are the means of communication between the immune cells as well as in the coordination of various immune cells. There appears to be a complex system of regulatory processes which maintain an equlibrium between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and thus keep the immune response limited and balanced. If this balanced response of various mechanisms fails in one or more ways, it may induce excessive immune activation and augmented cytokine production, causing an unlocalized and systemic inflammatory response which may harm the organism [50]. The cytokine storm is shown to be characteristic of serious COVID-19 infection and characterized by augmented secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and it is related to disease severity [51]. The cytokine storm in COVID-19 disease is related to increased IL-6 and TNF-α expression [52]. IL-6 is implicated in the pathogenesis of euthyroid sick syndrome [53]. In acute myocardial infarction, low FT3, normal or low TSH, and high IL-6 and its soluble receptor were observed. IL-6 elevation and euthyroid sick syndrome development are interconnected [53]. Various data show a role of IL-6 in the interaction between thyroid axis and inflammatory mediators [17]. In a clinical study, IL-6 levels were negatively correlated with FT3 and positively with rT3 [43,54]. It may thus be that, in the case of acute and serious SARS-CoV-2 disease, the development of non-thyroidal illness syndrome may be linked to augmented inflammatory cytokine secretion [55].
In our study, we observed a negative correlation between CRP and FT3 levels, which was statistically significant, but the correlation was not statistically strong. CRP levels increase in acute infectious disease and are observed in acute COVID-19 infection [56]. CRP levels characterize acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. CRP synthesis by the liver is induced by IL-6. Elevated CRP levels in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection are related to the cytokine storm and to disease severity [56,57]. Thus, in our study, elevated CRP levels were found to be negatively related to FT3 levels.
Treatment of euthyroid sick syndrome remains a topic of high research interest [58]. Euthyroid sick syndrome may be considered an adaptive and energy preservation response [17]. Various investigators have attempted to treat patients with euthyroid sick syndrome with thyroxine, with controversial results. Thyroxine administration in the acute care unit as an intravenous infusion normalized T4 levels without affecting mortality [59]. Various studies have examined the effect of therapeutic T3 administration in adult patients with heart failure or coronary artery surgery. Other studies have shown promising as well as less promising results [60,61]. T3 administration for the preservation of organ function in brain-dead donors has been attempted in order to preserve functionality in the organs to be transplanted [62]. Combined treatment with GHRH, TRH, and GnRH in male patients with critical disease has also been attempted [63]. However, most researchers and clinicians agree that non-thyroidal illness syndrome should not be treated with thyroid drug administration [64], as the syndrome improves in parallel with the underlying illness. Euthyroid sick syndrome or non-thyroidal illness syndrome represents a response to fasting in healthy individuals and is present in patients with acute severe illness [65,66]. However, euthyroid sick syndrome in long-term critically ill patients, who have low T3, T4, and TSH levels, may represent a different facet of the disorder and may require treatment in order to prevent catabolic alterations within the organism [33]. It is this particular group of patients that may benefit from treatment for euthyroid sick syndrome and may be the subjects to benefit from new or developing treatments for the disorder [33,63].
Soon after the COVID-19 pandemic swept over the world, it became evident that the virus affected the thyroid gland, as numerous cases of subacute thyroiditis were described in relation with the infection [67,68,69,70]. Simultaneously, various cases of thyroiditis and autoimmune Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were described in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, new cases of Graves’ disease or exacerbation of previously stable Graves’ disease or Graves’ ophthalmopathy were described. Data emerged highlighting that the SARS-CoV-2 virus may be an autoimmune virus, i.e., a virus causing autoimmune diseases [71]. The COVID-19 virus invades the thyroid gland via the ACE2 enzyme, which the virus uses as a receptor and is expressed on thyroid cells. Prognosis of severe COVID-19 infection is a topic of interest in the current literature. Various indicators of severe disease and adverse outcome have been described, including vitamin D levels and kidney function parameters [72,73,74]. Herein, we describe the association of severe SARS-CoV-2 disease with euthyroid sick or non-thyroidal illness syndrome. The presence of euthyroid sick syndrome was related to disease severity and death. It appears that the measurement of thyroid hormone levels in patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19 disease may help to define disease severity and prognosis.

5. Study Limitations

This study has limitations as it utilizes a relatively small number of patients from a single center.

6. Conclusions

The SARS-CoV-2 virus led to a global pandemic and caused mild and severe disease. It also caused cases of severe pneumonia that could be lethal. The development of the cytokine storm, i.e., an inflammatory cascade, was related to severe disease and adverse outcomes. Early observations showed that the virus may affect the thyroid gland and induce subacute thyroiditis. Various cases of subacute thyroiditis have been described in the literature. It was later reported that the virus may also cause thyroiditis, autoimmune thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, and Graves’ disease or exacerbation of previously quiescent Graves’ disease or Graves’ ophthalmopathy. In the present study, we have provided evidence that patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 disease may present with euthyroid sick syndrome or non-thyroidal illness syndrome or low T3 syndrome. The cytokine storm observed in severe SARS-CoV-2 disease may be related to the development of euthyroid sick syndrome. Data presented herein indicate that euthyroid sick syndrome in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 disease may be related to disease severity and appears to be an indicator of adverse prognosis. The relationship between euthyroid sick syndrome and the cytokine storm may be further proof of the severe inflammatory reaction in severe COVID-19 infection. Thyroid hormone measurement in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 disease and the subsequent identification of the presence of euthyroid sick syndrome may be an index of disease severity and subsequent adverse outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A., I.K.-A., P.A. and Y.S.; methodology, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; software, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; validation, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; formal analysis, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; investigation, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; resources, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; data curation, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; writing—review and editing, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; visualization, L.A., I.K.-A., G.K., S.N., A.K., O.M., C.S. (Charilaos Samaras), C.S. (Christos Savopoulos), P.A. and Y.S.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, P.A.; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, Athens, Greece (approval number 15335, 24 November 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available at the data archives of Asclepeion Hospital, Voula, Athens, Greece.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. McIver, B.; Gorman, C.A. Euthyroid sick syndrome: An overview. Thyroid 1997, 7, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fliers, E.; Boelen, A. An update on non-thyroidal illness syndrome. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2021, 44, 1597–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fliers, E.; Bianco, A.C.; Langouche, L.; Boelen, A. Thyroid function in critically ill patients. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peeters, R.P.; Wouters, P.J.; Kaptein, E.; van Toor, H.; Visser, T.J.; Van den Berghe, G. Reduced activation and increased inactivation of thyroid hormone in tissues of critically ill patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 3202–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peeters, R.P.; van der Geyten, S.; Wouters, P.J.; Darras, V.M.; van Toor, H.; Kaptein, E.; Visser, T.J.; Van den Berghe, G. Tissue thyroid hormone levels in critical illness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 6498–6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nillni, E.A.; Vaslet, C.; Harris, M.; Hollenberg, A.; Bjørbak, C.; Flier, J.S. Leptin regulates prothyrotropin-releasing hormone biosynthesis. Evidence for direct and indirect pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36124–36133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lawson, E.A.; Klibanski, A. Endocrine abnormalities in anorexia nervosa. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 4, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hennemann, G.; Krenning, E.P. The kinetics of thyroid hormone transporters and their role in non-thyroidal illness and starvation. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 21, 323–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Douyon, L.; Schteingart, D.E. Effect of obesity and starvation on thyroid hormone, growth hormone, and cortisol secretion. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 31, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holland, F.W., II; Brown, P.S.; Weintraub, B.D., Jr.; Clark, R.E. Cardiopulmonary bypass and thyroid function: A “euthyroid sick syndrome”. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1991, 52, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Broderick, T.J.; Wechsler, A.S. Triiodothyronine in cardiac surgery. Thyroid 1997, 7, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, S.; Farwell, A.P. Euthyroid Sick Syndrome. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nistal-Nuño, B. Euthyroid sick syndrome in paediatric and adult patients requiring extracorporeal circulatory support and the role of thyroid hormone supplementation: A review. Perfusion 2021, 36, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cauteruccio, M.; Vitiello, R.; Perisano, C.; Covino, M.; Sircana, G.; Piccirillo, N.; Pesare, E.; Maccauro, G. Euthyroid sick syndrome in hip fractures: Evaluation of postoperative anemia. Injury 2020, 51 (Suppl. S3), S9–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, X.Y.; Yi, M.; Li, W.G.; Ye, H.Y.; Chen, Z.S.; Zhang, X.D. The prevalence, hospitalization outcomes and risk factors of euthyroid sick syndrome in patients with diabetic ketosis/ketoacidosis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023, 23, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akman, T.; Topaloglu, O.; Altunoglu, A.; Neselioglu, S.; Erel, O. Frequency of Euthyroid Sick Syndrome before and after renal transplantation in patients with end stage renal disease and its association with oxidative stress. Postgrad. Med. 2022, 134, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pappa, T.A.; Vagenakis, A.G.; Alevizaki, M. The nonthyroidal illness syndrome in the non-critically ill patient. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 41, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. AlQahtani, A.; Alakkas, Z.; Althobaiti, F.; Alosaimi, M.; Abuzinadah, B.; Abdulkhalik, E.; Alswat, K. Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients Admitted in Cardiac Care Unit: Prevalence, Characteristic and Hospitalization Outcomes. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maiden, M.J.; Torpy, D.J. Thyroid Hormones in Critical Illness. Crit. Care Clin. 2019, 35, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Yuan, W.; Dong, R.; Liu, N.; Liu, D.; Zhou, Y. Predictors for euthyroid sick syndrome and its impact on in-hospital clinical outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 2019, 34, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. den Brinker, M.; Joosten, K.F.; Visser, T.J.; Hop, W.C.; de Rijke, Y.B.; Hazelzet, J.A.; Boonstra, V.H.; Hokken-Koelega, A.C. Euthyroid sick syndrome in meningococcal sepsis: The impact of peripheral thyroid hormone metabolism and binding proteins. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 5613–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ataoğlu, H.E.; Ahbab, S.; Serez, M.K.; Yamak, M.; Kayaş, D.; Canbaz, E.T.; Çetin, F.; Seçmeler, Ş.; Şar, F.; Yenigün, M. Prognostic significance of high free T4 and low free T3 levels in non-thyroidal illness syndrome. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 57, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raber, J.; Sorg, O.; Horn, T.F.; Yu, N.; Koob, G.F.; Campbell, I.L.; Bloom, F.E. Inflammatory cytokines: Putative regulators of neuronal and neuro-endocrine function. Brain Res. Rev. 1998, 26, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chow, C.C.; Mak, T.W.; Chan, C.H.; Cockram, C.S. Euthyroid sick syndrome in pulmonary tuberculosis before and after treatment. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 1995, 32 Pt 4, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sharma, N.; Sharma, L.K.; Dutta, D.; Gadpayle, A.K.; Anand, A.; Gaurav, K.; Mukherjee, S.; Bansal, R. Prevalence and Predictors of Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients with HIV Infection and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: An Indian Perspective. J. Thyroid Res. 2015, 2015, 517173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Post, F.A.; Soule, S.G.; Willcox, P.A.; Levitt, N.S. The spectrum of endocrine dysfunction in active pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin. Endocrinol. 1994, 40, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zou, R.; Wu, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, B.; Wu, Y.; Dong, H.; Wu, G.; Wu, S.; et al. Euthyroid Sick Syndrome in Patients With COVID-19. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 566439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Girvent, M.; Maestro, S.; Hernández, R.; Carajol, I.; Monné, J.; Sancho, J.J.; Gubern, J.; Sitges-Serra, A. Euthyroid sick syndrome, associated endocrine abnormalities, and outcome in elderly patients undergoing emergency operation. Surgery 1998, 123, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Opasich, C.; Pacini, F.; Ambrosino, N.; Riccardi, P.G.; Febo, O.; Ferrari, R.; Cobelli, F.; Tavazzi, L. Sick euthyroid syndrome in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 1996, 17, 1860–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Özcan, K.S.; Osmonov, D.; Toprak, E.; Güngör, B.; Tatlısu, A.; Ekmekçi, A.; Kaya, A.; Tayyareci, G.; Erdinler, I. Sick euthyroid syndrome is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. Cardiol. J. 2014, 21, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zeng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, R. Related factors of euthyroid sick syndrome in patients with sepsis. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2024, 56, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Langouche, L.; Jacobs, A.; Van den Berghe, G. Nonthyroidal Illness Syndrome Across the Ages. J. Endocr. Soc. 2019, 3, 2313–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van den Berghe, G. Non-thyroidal illness in the ICU: A syndrome with different faces. Thyroid 2014, 24, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fastiggi, M.; Meneghel, A.; de Rubalcava Doblas, J.G.; Vittadello, F.; Tirelli, F.; Zulian, F.; Martini, G. Prognostic role of euthyroid sick syndrome in MIS-C: Results from a single-center observational study. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1217151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schwarz, Y.; Percik, R.; Oberman, B.; Yaffe, D.; Zimlichman, E.; Tirosh, A. Sick Euthyroid Syndrome on Presentation of Patients With COVID-19: A Potential Marker for Disease Severity. Endocr. Pract. 2021, 27, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khoo, B.; Tan, T.; A Clarke, S.; Mills, E.G.; Patel, B.; Modi, M.; Phylactou, M.; Eng, P.C.; Thurston, L.; Alexander, E.C.; et al. Thyroid Function Before, During, and After COVID-19. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e803–e811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Świstek, M.; Broncel, M.; Gorzelak-Pabiś, P.; Morawski, P.; Fabiś, M.; Woźniak, E. Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as a Prognostic Indicator of COVID-19 Pulmonary Involvement, Associated With Poorer Disease Prognosis and Increased Mortality. Endocr. Pract. 2022, 28, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sparano, C.; Zago, E.; Morettini, A.; Nozzoli, C.; Yannas, D.; Adornato, V.; Caldini, E.; Vaudo, M.; Maggi, M.; Petrone, L. Euthyroid sick syndrome as an early surrogate marker of poor outcome in mild SARS-CoV-2 disease. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2022, 45, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baldelli, R.; Nicastri, E.; Petrosillo, N.; Marchioni, L.; Gubbiotti, A.; Sperduti, I.; Di Giacinto, P.; Rizza, L.; Rota, F.; Franco, M.; et al. Thyroid dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2021, 44, 2735–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sciacchitano, S.; De Vitis, C.; D’aScanio, M.; Giovagnoli, S.; De Dominicis, C.; Laghi, A.; Anibaldi, P.; Petrucca, A.; Salerno, G.; Santino, I.; et al. Gene signature and immune cell profiling by high-dimensional, single-cell analysis in COVID-19 patients, presenting Low T3 syndrome and coexistent hematological malignancies. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iervasi, G.; Pingitore, A.; Landi, P.; Raciti, M.; Ripoli, A.; Scarlattini, M.; L’aBbate, A.; Donato, L. Low-T3 syndrome: A strong prognostic predictor of death in patients with heart disease. Circulation 2003, 107, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cerillo, A.G.; Storti, S.; Kallushi, E.; Haxhiademi, D.; Miceli, A.; Murzi, M.; Berti, S.; Glauber, M.; Clerico, A.; Iervasi, G. The low triiodothyronine syndrome: A strong predictor of low cardiac output and death in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014, 97, 2089–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boelen, A.; Kwakkel, J.; Fliers, E. Beyond low plasma T3: Local thyroid hormone metabolism during inflammation and infection. Endocr. Rev. 2011, 32, 670–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. de Vries, E.; Kwakkel, J.; Eggels, L.; Kalsbeek, A.; Barrett, P.; Fliers, E.; Boelen, A. NFκB signaling is essential for the lipopolysaccharide-induced increase of type 2 deiodinase in tanycytes. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 2000–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wajner, S.M.; Goemann, I.M.; Bueno, A.L.; Larsen, P.R.; Maia, A.L. IL-6 promotes nonthyroidal illness syndrome by blocking thyroxine activation while promoting thyroid hormone inactivation in human cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1834–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Feelders, R.; Swaak, A.; Romijn, J.; Eggermont, A.; Tielens, E.; Vreugdenhill, G.; Endert, E.; van Eijk, H.; Berghout, A. Characteristics of recovery from the euthyroid sick syndrome induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha in cancer patients. Metabolism 1999, 48, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zanza, C.; Romenskaya, T.; Manetti, A.C.; Franceschi, F.; La Russa, R.; Bertozzi, G.; Maiese, A.; Savioli, G.; Volonnino, G.; Longhitano, Y. Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: Immunopathogenesis and Therapy. Medicina 2022, 58, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ye, Q.; Wang, B.; Mao, J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chousterman, B.G.; Swirski, F.K.; Weber, G.F. Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017, 39, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schulert, G.S.; Grom, A.A. Pathogenesis of macrophage activation syndrome and potential for cytokine- directed therapies. Annu. Rev. Med. 2015, 66, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hirano, T.; Murakami, M. COVID-19: A New Virus, but a Familiar Receptor and Cytokine Release Syndrome. Immunity 2020, 52, 731–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kimura, T.; Kanda, T.; Kotajima, N.; Kuwabara, A.; Fukumura, Y.; Kobayashi, I. Involvement of circulating interleukin-6 and its receptor in the development of euthyroid sick syndrome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 143, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boelen, A.; Schiphorst, M.C.P.-T.; Bakker, O.; Wiersinga, W.M. The role of cytokines in the lipopolysaccharide-induced sick euthyroid syndrome in mice. J. Endocrinol. 1995, 146, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Karki, R.; Sharma, B.R.; Tuladhar, S.; Williams, E.P.; Zalduondo, L.; Samir, P.; Zheng, M.; Sundaram, B.; Banoth, B.; Malireddi, R.S.; et al. Synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ Triggers Inflammatory Cell Death, Tissue Damage, and Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cytokine Shock Syndromes. Cell 2021, 184, 149–168.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luan, Y.Y.; Yin, C.H.; Yao, Y.M. Update Advances on C-Reactive Protein in COVID-19 and Other Viral Infections. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 720363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Molins, B.; Figueras-Roca, M.; Valero, O.; Llorenç, V.; Romero-Vázquez, S.; Sibila, O.; Adán, A.; García-Vidal, C.; Soriano, A. C-reactive protein isoforms as prognostic markers of COVID-19 severity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1105343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stathatos, N.; Wartofsky, L. The euthyroid sick syndrome: Is there a physiologic rationale for thyroid hormone treatment? J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2003, 26, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brent, G.A.; Hershman, J.M. Thyroxine therapy in patients with severe nonthyroidal illnesses and low serum thyroxine concentration. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1986, 63, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mullis-Jansson, S.L.; Argenziano, M.; Corwin, S.; Homma, S.; Weinberg, A.D.; Williams, M.; Rose, E.A.; Smith, C.R. A randomized double-blind study of the effect of triiodothyronine on cardiac function and morbidity after coronary bypass surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999, 117, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pingitore, A.; Nicolini, G.; Kusmic, C.; Iervasi, G.; Grigolini, P.; Forini, F. Cardioprotection and thyroid hormones. Heart Fail. Rev. 2016, 21, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Goarin, J.-P.; Cohen, S.; Riou, B.; Jacquens, Y.; Guesde, R.; Le Bret, F.; Aurengo, A.; Coriat, P. The effects of triiodothyronine on hemodynamic status and cardiac function in potential heart donors. Anesth. Analg. 1996, 83, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van den Berghe, G. Growth hormone secretagogues in critical illness. Horm. Res. 1999, 51 (Suppl. S3), 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bartalena, L. The dilemma of non-thyroidal illness syndrome: To treat or not to treat? J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2003, 12, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Boelen, A.; Wiersinga, W.M.; Fliers, E. Fasting-induced changes in the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis. Thyroid 2008, 18, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Everts, M.E.; de Jong, M.; Lim, C.-F.; Docter, R.; Krenning, E.P.; Visser, T.J.; Hennemann, G. Different regulation of thyroid hormone transport in liver and pituitary: Its possible role in the maintenance of low T3 production during nonthyroidal illness and fasting in man. Thyroid 1996, 6, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Christensen, J.; O’CAllaghan, K.; Sinclair, H.; Hawke, K.; Love, A.; Hajkowicz, K.; Stewart, A.G. Risk factors, treatment and outcomes of subacute thyroiditis secondary to COVID-19: A systematic review. Intern. Med. J. 2022, 52, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seyed Resuli, A.; Bezgal, M. Subacute Thyroiditis in COVID-19 Patients. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022, 101, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sohrabpour, S.; Heidari, F.; Karimi, E.; Ansari, R.; Tajdini, A. Subacute Thyroiditis in COVID-19 Patients. Eur. Thyroid J. 2021, 9, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Henke, K.; Odermatt, J.; Ziaka, M.; Rudovich, N. Subacute Thyroiditis Complicating COVID-19 Infection. Clin. Med. Insights Case Rep. 2023, 16, 11795476231181560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dotan, A.; Muller, S.; Kanduc, D.; David, P.; Halpert, G.; Shoenfeld, Y. The SARS-CoV-2 as an instrumental trigger of autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Battaglini, D.; Lopes-Pacheco, M.; Castro-Faria-Neto, H.C.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M. Laboratory Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 857573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. de La Flor, J.C.; Gomez-Berrocal, A.; Marschall, A.; Valga, F.; Linares, T.; Albarracin, C.; Ruiz, E.; Gallegos, G.; Gómez, A.; de Los Santos, A.; et al. Impacto de la corrección temprana de la hiponatremia en el pronóstico de la infección del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave del coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Med. Clin. 2022, 159, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chiodini, I.; Gatti, D.; Soranna, D.; Merlotti, D.; Mingiano, C.; Fassio, A.; Adami, G.; Falchetti, A.; Eller-Vainicher, C.; Rossini, M.; et al. Vitamin D Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 736665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FT3 (pg/mL, mean ± SD) and FT4 (ng/dL, mean ± SD) levels in patients with severe COVID-19 disease without and with euthyroid sick syndrome.
Figure 1. FT3 (pg/mL, mean ± SD) and FT4 (ng/dL, mean ± SD) levels in patients with severe COVID-19 disease without and with euthyroid sick syndrome.
Medicina 61 01372 g001
Figure 2. TSH levels (μIU/mL) (mean ± SD) in patients with severe COVID-19 infection with and without euthyroid sick syndrome.
Figure 2. TSH levels (μIU/mL) (mean ± SD) in patients with severe COVID-19 infection with and without euthyroid sick syndrome.
Medicina 61 01372 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between FT3 and CRP levels in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Figure 3. Relationship between FT3 and CRP levels in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Medicina 61 01372 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of patients admitted and cared for in hospital for severe COVID-19 infection: age (years) (mean ± SD), sex, white blood cell count, CRP (mg/L), ESR (mm/1 h), ferritin (ng/mL), d-dimers (μg/L), fibrinogen (ng/dL), K (mmol/l), PT (s), APTT (s), INR, and disease severity (1–4) [1—uncompromised respiratory function (pO2 > 70 mmHg, without need of oxygen supplementation); 2—mild respiratory insufficiency (pO2 50–60 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with nasal cannula); 3—severe respiratory insufficiency (pO2 < 50 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with high flow oxygen); 4—and severe respiratory insufficiency requiring intubation (pO2 < 60 mmHg on high flow oxygen supplementation)].
Table 1. Characteristics of patients admitted and cared for in hospital for severe COVID-19 infection: age (years) (mean ± SD), sex, white blood cell count, CRP (mg/L), ESR (mm/1 h), ferritin (ng/mL), d-dimers (μg/L), fibrinogen (ng/dL), K (mmol/l), PT (s), APTT (s), INR, and disease severity (1–4) [1—uncompromised respiratory function (pO2 > 70 mmHg, without need of oxygen supplementation); 2—mild respiratory insufficiency (pO2 50–60 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with nasal cannula); 3—severe respiratory insufficiency (pO2 < 50 mmHg, in need of oxygen supplementation with high flow oxygen); 4—and severe respiratory insufficiency requiring intubation (pO2 < 60 mmHg on high flow oxygen supplementation)].
SARS-CoV-2 Patients
Age72.1 ± 16.09
Sex33 F/30 M
White blood cell count (cells/μL)6474.23 ± 3499.10
Neutrophils (%)70.8 ± 13.4
CRP65.1 ± 60.1
ESR (mm/1 h)43.1 ± 23.9
Ferritin (ng/mL)846.8 ± 125.1
d-dimers (μg/L)1640.1 ± 1104.1
Fibrinogen (ng/dL)547.5 ± 164.1
K (mmol/L)3.87 ± 0.59
PT (s)11.7 ± 1.05
APTT (s)30.81 ± 3.96
 INR 1.02 ± 0.1
 Disease severity 1 (23), 2 (18), 3 (16), 4 (6)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Athanassiou, L.; Kostoglou-Athanassiou, I.; Kaiafa, G.; Nikolakopoulou, S.; Konstantinou, A.; Mascha, O.; Samaras, C.; Savopoulos, C.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Athanassiou, P. Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as an Index of Prognosis in Severe COVID-19 Disease. Medicina 2025, 61, 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081372

AMA Style

Athanassiou L, Kostoglou-Athanassiou I, Kaiafa G, Nikolakopoulou S, Konstantinou A, Mascha O, Samaras C, Savopoulos C, Shoenfeld Y, Athanassiou P. Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as an Index of Prognosis in Severe COVID-19 Disease. Medicina. 2025; 61(8):1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Athanassiou, Lambros, Ifigenia Kostoglou-Athanassiou, Georgia Kaiafa, Sofia Nikolakopoulou, Alexandra Konstantinou, Olga Mascha, Charilaos Samaras, Christos Savopoulos, Yehuda Shoenfeld, and Panagiotis Athanassiou. 2025. "Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as an Index of Prognosis in Severe COVID-19 Disease" Medicina 61, no. 8: 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081372

APA Style

Athanassiou, L., Kostoglou-Athanassiou, I., Kaiafa, G., Nikolakopoulou, S., Konstantinou, A., Mascha, O., Samaras, C., Savopoulos, C., Shoenfeld, Y., & Athanassiou, P. (2025). Euthyroid Sick Syndrome as an Index of Prognosis in Severe COVID-19 Disease. Medicina, 61(8), 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081372

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop