Next Article in Journal
Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Biomarker for Selected Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders—A Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Is a Ureteral Access Sheath Necessary for Maintaining Safe Intrarenal Pressures During Retrograde Lithotripsy Using a Flexible 7.5 Fr Scope and a High-Power TFL? In Vivo Experimental Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prognostic Value of Initial Inflammatory Biomarkers, ECG Findings, and Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity

by
Bojana Uzelac
1,*,
Vladimir Jakovljević
2,3,4,
Vladimir Živković
2,3,5,
Jelena Janković
6,
Katarina Lazarević
7,
Danilo Marković
7,
Marija Laban-Lazović
6,
Andrija Jovanović
1,
Marina Đikić
1,
Dušica Gujaničić
1,
Ivana Milićević-Nešić
1 and
Sanja Stanković
8,9
1
Emergency Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
3
Center of Excellence for Redox Balance Research in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
4
Department of Human Pathology, First Moscow State Medical University I.M. Sechenov, 119146 Moscow, Russia
5
Department of Pharmacology, First Moscow State Medical University I.M. Sechenov, 119146 Moscow, Russia
6
Clinic for Pulmonology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
7
Center for Radiology and Magnetic Resonance, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
8
Center for Medical Biochemistry, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
9
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(10), 1830; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101830
Submission received: 29 August 2025 / Revised: 8 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 13 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular mortality. Recent insights into PTE pathophysiology emphasize the complex interplay of multiple mechanisms, particularly the roles of thrombosis and inflammation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center observational study included 138 participants: 69 adult patients diagnosed with PTE via computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 69 matched healthy controls. Upon admission, a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed, and Daniel’s score was calculated. Peripheral blood samples were collected to assess inflammatory biomarkers and hemogram-derived ratios (SII, NLR, dNLR, NPR, PLR, LMR). CTPA scans were analyzed not only for diagnostic purposes and PTE localization but also for inflammatory changes. PTE severity was classified according to the 2019 ESC guidelines. Results: Patients with PTE had significantly higher Daniel’s ECG scores, initial values of inflammatory biomarkers (WBC, neutrophils, IL-6, CRP) and hemogram-derived ratios (SII, NLR, dNLR, NPR) compared to controls. In multivariate analysis, older age (OR = 1.05; p = 0.038), higher Daniel’s ECG score (OR = 1.24; p < 0.001), and higher dNLR (OR = 1.40; p = 0.001) were found as an independent predictors of PTE severity. Ground-glass opacity (GGO) was the most common parenchymal and pleural inflammatory finding relating to CTPA (48.4%), but these findings did not show significant predictive value for PTE severity. Conclusions: Daniel’s ECG score and dNLR, both readily available and cost-effective biomarkers demonstrated independent predictive value for assessing PTE severity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death, following acute myocardial infarction and stroke, with an estimated incidence of 75 to 269 events per 100,000 individuals and approximately 60,000 to 100,000 annual deaths [1,2,3].
The modern concept of PTE pathophysiology is closely linked to endothelial injury, inflammation, hypercoagulability, and hemodynamic disorders. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8) activate tissue factors, exhibit pro-coagulant effects, trigger platelet adhesion and aggregation, promote vasoconstriction, and may induce thrombosis. Sympathetic activation during acute stress affects leukocyte distribution by increasing neutrophil counts and decreasing lymphocyte counts. These mechanisms are reflected in hemogram-derived inflammatory ratios, low-cost markers easily calculated from a routine complete blood count (CBC) [4,5,6,7,8]. Although these ratios have proven useful as markers of inflammatory response in various pathological conditions [6,7,8], only a few studies have investigated their significance in PTE patients [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Acute PTE causes a sudden increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, leading to right ventricular (RV) pressure overload and acute dilation. This mechanical stress is reflected in ECG changes indicative of RV strain, such as sinus tachycardia, right bundle branch block (RBBB), ST-segment changes, T-wave inversions, and right axis deviation. Additionally, PTE triggers the release of inflammatory mediators, causing myocardial edema, oxidative stress, and direct injury to the RV myocardium-factors that further compromise hemodynamics, electrical stability, and ECG findings [16,17,18,19].
In 2001, Daniel et al. [20] proposed a scoring system that incorporates several ECG changes predictive of increased pulmonary arterial pressure and adverse clinical outcomes, including death, in patients with PTE. Subsequent investigations confirmed the diagnostic value of this score and expanded it beyond its original components (tachycardia, S1Q3T3 pattern, RBBB/incomplete RBBB, and T-wave inversions in leads V1–V4) to also include ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and atrial fibrillation (AF). All six ECG abnormalities were associated with an increased risk of circulatory shock and 30-day mortality in PTE patients [21,22]. However, despite these findings, Daniel’s ECG score remains underutilized in daily clinical practice.
While computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is well established as the gold standard for diagnosing PTE [23], its clinical utility extends beyond diagnosis. CTPA provides detailed visualization of thrombus location, which plays a key role in PTE risk stratification. More centrally located thrombi (in the main or lobar pulmonary arteries) are associated with a higher clot burden and worse clinical outcomes. In addition to thrombotic findings, CTPA can also reveal parenchymal and pleural inflammatory changes such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidation, pleural effusion, and lymphadenopathy. Although systemic inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., WBC, CRP, IL-6) and hemogram-derived inflammatory ratios have been linked to PTE severity and mortality, data on the prognostic significance of inflammatory findings on CTPA remain limited [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
This study aims to determine whether initial systemic inflammatory biomarkers, hemogram-derived inflammatory ratios, Daniel’s ECG score, or CTPA-detected inflammatory findings can serve as independent predictors of PTE severity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the University Clinical Centre of Serbia (UCCS), within the Emergency Center, from March 2023 to February 2024. A total of 138 adults were included: 69 patients with PTE diagnosed via CTPA and 69 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers without prior comorbidities, who served as controls.
Patients with confirmed PTE were stratified according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines [23] into four risk categories: low risk (n = 17, 24.6%), intermediate-low risk (n = 30, 43.5%), intermediate-high risk (n = 19, 27.5%), and high risk (n = 3, 4.3%). Due to the small number of high-risk patients, the intermediate-high and high-risk groups were combined for statistical analysis.

2.2. Laboratory Analysis

At admission, peripheral venous blood samples were collected for standard biochemical analyses and measurement of inflammatory biomarkers, including white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophils, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Hemogram-derived inflammatory ratios were calculated as follows [6]:
SII = (platelet count × neutrophil count)/lymphocyte count
NLR = neutrophils/lymphocytes
dNLR = neutrophils/(leukocytes − neutrophils)
PLR = platelets/lymphocytes
NPR = neutrophils/platelets
LMR = lymphocytes/monocytes

2.3. Electrocardiography (ECG)

All subjects underwent a standard 12-lead ECG using a Schiller Cardiovit AT-102 G2 device. The components of Daniel’s ECG score [20] were recorded and scored, including: sinus tachycardia, complete or incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB/iRBBB), T-wave inversion (TWI) in leads V1–V4, and the S1Q3T3 pattern.

2.4. Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)

CTPA was performed using a 64-row Siemens Somatom Drive CT scanner following a standard protocol: an intravenous injection of 100 mL of contrast medium at a flow rate of 4 mL/s, with lung scanning from the base to the apex in a caudocephalic direction at a tube voltage of 120 kV during an inspiratory breath-hold [29].
Pulmonary embolism was identified as partial intraluminal filling defects or complete occlusion of the pulmonary artery observed on two consecutive CT slices. Thrombus location was classified as main (left or right), lobar, or segmental. Inflammatory parenchymal and pleural findings were defined as follows: ground-glass opacity (an area of increased lung attenuation), consolidation (a dense, homogeneous opacity that obscures vessels and airway walls), pleural effusion (a fluid-density collection in one or both pleural spaces), and lymphadenopathy (mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes larger than 10 mm in short axis) [31].
All CTPA scans were independently reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Seven patients who had already undergone CTPA at another medical facility before referral to the Emergency Center were excluded from the analysis. Therefore, a total of 62 CT scans were evaluated by the radiologists at the Emergency Center.

3. Exclusion Criteria

Patients were excluded from the study if they met any of the following criteria: age > 70 years, chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine > 400 µmol/L), morbid obesity (weight > 160 kg, CT machine limit), or death prior to hospital admission.

4. Statistical Analysis

Depending on the type of variables and the normality of the distribution, the data description is presented as n (%), arithmetic mean ± standard deviation, or median (min-max). Among the methods for testing statistical hypotheses, we used: t-test, Mann–Whitney test, chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact probability test. Ordinal logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the dependent variable (degree of PTE) and potential predictors. Predictors from univariate analyses that were statistically significant at the significance level of 0.1 were included in the multivariate regression models. Statistical hypotheses were tested at a statistical significance level (alpha level) of 0.05. The results are presented tabularly and graphically. All data were processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 24 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

5. Results

A total of 138 subjects were included in the study: 69 patients with PTE diagnosed by CTPA (66.7% male, mean age 54.9 ± 11.8 years) and 69 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (66.7% male, mean age 55.3 ± 11.6 years).
Patients with PTE had significantly higher Daniel’s ECG scores at admission (p < 0.001) and significantly elevated initial levels of inflammatory biomarkers, including WBC, neutrophils, IL-6, and CRP (p < 0.001). Hemogram-derived inflammatory ratios (SII, NLR, dNLR, NPR) were significantly higher in the PTE group, whereas LMR was significantly lower (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in PLR levels between groups (p = 0.063). Clinical characteristics and laboratory findings are summarized in Table 1.
More than half of the patients, 36 (58.1%), had embolism in at least one of the main pulmonary arteries: 22 (35.5%) in both main branches and 14 (22.6%) in a single main artery. Lobar PTE was identified in 18 patients (29.0%), while segmental PTE was observed in 8 patients (12.9%). Parenchymal and pleural inflammatory changes detected on CTPA included ground-glass opacity (48.4%), pleural effusions (unilateral or bilateral) (32.3%), mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy (30.6%), and parenchymal consolidation (29.0%). The distribution of PTE and CTPA inflammatory findings is summarized in Table 2.
The univariate model of ordinal logistic regression, with the degree of PTE as the dependent variable, is shown in Table 3.
The multivariate model of ordinal logistic regression with the degree of PTE as a dependent variable, is shown in Figure 1. The whole model (with all predictors) was statistically significant (p < 0.001) and accounted for 42% of the variation in the dependent variable. Due to multi-collinearity with the dNLR variable, the NLR variable was not included in the multivariate model.
Statistically significant predictors of PTE severity included older age (OR = 1.05; p = 0.038), higher Daniel’s ECG score (OR = 1.24; p < 0.001), and elevated initial dNLR values (OR = 1.40; p = 0.001).
The relationship of individual predictors of PTE severity from the multivariable model is shown in Figure 2.

6. Discussion

This study is the first to comprehensively assess Daniel’s ECG score, inflammatory hemogram-derived ratios, and CTPA findings in assessing PTE severity. Our results demonstrate that both dNLR and Daniel’s ECG score are statistically significant independent predictors of PTE severity.
Earlier studies found no sex-related difference in total PTE incidence; however, the pattern varies across age groups. Among individuals aged 20–40, women experience PTE at nearly twice the rate of men, whereas after age 60, approximately 25% higher incidence is observed in men [32].
In our study, two-thirds of PTE patients were men (66.7% male and 33.3% female), with a mean age of 54.9 ± 11.8 years. Age was a statistically significant predictor of a higher degree of PTE (OR = 1.05; p = 0.038). Each additional year of age increased the likelihood for higher degree of PTE by 5%.
The interplay between inflammation and thrombosis has gained increasing attention, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic and its virus-induced hypercoagulability [6,33,34]. Afzal et al. first reported a correlation between elevated WBC and neutrophil counts and PTE [35], while Huang C.M. et al. later identified WBC ≥ 11,000/mm3 as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality [36]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is well-known to be elevated in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PTE [37,38]; however, recent studies remain inconclusive regarding its direct inflammatory role [39], and some have found no predictive value of CRP for PTE severity [9]. Bontekoe et al. [4] reported upregulation of inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β) in PTE patients, and several studies have demonstrated an association between IL-6 levels and PTE mortality [40].
Consistent with previous studies [35,36,37,38,39,40], our results also showed elevated inflammatory biomarkers (WBC, neutrophil counts, CRP, and IL-6) in PTE patients compared with healthy controls. However, these markers did not demonstrate statistically significant predictive value for PTE severity.
Recent research on hemogram-derived ratios has shown a strong correlation with pulmonary embolism. Gok et al. [9] reported elevated SII levels in PTE patients, correlating with PTE severity. Both PLR and NLR were found to be increased in high-risk PTE [10,11,12,13], with NLR recognized as an independent predictor of early mortality [14]. Although dNLR has been identified as an outcome predictor in other conditions such as COVID-19 and malignancy [41,42], it has not yet been investigated in PTE. NPR values have previously been studied in COVID-19 PTE patients [33]. Prior to this paper, only a few studies investigated LMR levels in PTE patients, concluding that lower LMR was an independent predictor of short-term mortality [15].
In our study, inflammatory hemogram-derived ratios, SII, NLR, dNLR, and NPR, were significantly higher in PTE patients (p < 0.001), while LMR values were significantly lower. Higher dNLR values were also significantly associated with PTE severity (OR = 1.40; p = 0.001).
ECG changes in PTE are well-known to result not only from mechanical right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and overload but are amplified by inflammation-induced myocardial injury and stress responses. Although ECG changes in PTE are often nonspecific, some reflect RV strain. In 2001, Daniel et al. [20] identified several ECG findings in PTE patients (tachycardia, S1Q3T3 pattern, RBBB/iRBBB, and TWI in V1–V4) and integrated them into an ECG scoring system (0–21), with scores above 8 predicting adverse clinical outcomes such as death, shock, or respiratory failure. Although subsequent studies [21,22] confirmed its validity and simplicity, this scoring system has not gained widespread clinical use.
We found that Daniel ECG score was significantly higher in PTE patients than in controls (p < 0.001). We also identified the Daniel ECG score as a significant predictor of PTE severity (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.11–1.39; p < 0.001). Each one-point increase in the Daniel score raised the likelihood of more severe PTE by 24%, after adjusting for other model variables.
Regarding PTE localization on CTPA, a meta-analysis found that neither total thrombus burden nor the most proximal PTE localization was correlated with all-cause mortality; nevertheless, both were predictive of adverse clinical outcomes [43].
Patients in our study exhibited a substantial embolic burden: more than half (58.1%) had embolism involving at least one main pulmonary artery, lobar PTE was observed in 29.0% of patients, and segmental PTE in 12.9%. However, these variables were not included in the final statistical model for two main reasons. First, involvement of the main pulmonary arteries (one or both) is inherently linked to higher PTE severity, making localization a proxy for the outcome rather than an independent predictor. Therefore, including it would introduce redundancy into the model. Second, PTE localization showed multicollinearity with the Daniel ECG score, already included as a predictor in the model.
Although the role of blood-based inflammatory biomarkers in PTE has been extensively studied, only few studies have examined inflammatory findings on CTPA in this population. Pfeil et al. [24] reported a correlation between wedge-shaped opacities and PTE, while Lee et al. [25] demonstrated a significant correlation between wedge-shaped peripheral consolidation and PTE in children. An animal model of acute PTE concluded that PTE triggers GGO in unobstructed lung regions, most likely due to the redistribution of blood flow. [26] Panjwani et al. [27] reported pleural effusion in 35% of PTE patients, typically exudative, small, and bilateral, associated with peripheral PTE. Although reported in more than one-third of patients with chronic pulmonary embolism, it remains unclear whether acute PTE is associated with reactive hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy [28].
In our study, GGO was observed on CTPA in nearly half of patients (48.4%), and parenchymal consolidation in nearly one-third (29.0%); however, neither finding was a significant predictor of PTE severity. These inflammatory findings on CTPA are most likely not directly related to PTE but may result from other pulmonary conditions such as infection, inflammation, or underlying lung disease [44]. Therefore, they cannot independently predict PTE severity.

7. Conclusions

Both Daniel’s ECG score and dNLR have been identified as independent, rapid, simple, and cost-effective predictors of PTE severity, available prior to other biochemical or imaging results. Their implementation could substantially enhance early risk stratification of PTE patients through simplified scoring systems applied at emergency admission.
However, given the modest sample size and the single-center design of this study, the generalizability of these findings is limited. Therefore, to validate their predictive value and determine whether Daniel’s score and dNLR improve risk stratification beyond current ESC guidelines, large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary.

8. Study Limitations

This study has several limitations. It was an observational, single-center study with a limited sample size. Therefore, the results should not be used definitively for clinical decision-making or risk prediction without confirmation from larger, randomized controlled trials. Additionally, due to the small number of high-risk patients, the intermediate-high and high-risk groups were combined; future multicenter studies with larger populations are warranted. Furthermore, patients over 70 years of age were not included, as this study represents a part of a larger research project conducted for a doctoral dissertation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.U., V.J., V.Ž. and S.S.; Data curation: B.U., V.Ž., J.J., K.L., D.M., M.L.-L., A.J., M.Đ., D.G., I.M.-N. and S.S.; Formal analysis: B.U., V.Ž., K.L., D.M. and S.S.; Investigation: B.U.; Methodology: B.U. and S.S.; Supervision: V.J. and S.S.; Validation: V.Ž.; Writing—original draft: B.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Centre of Serbia. Ethical Approval number: 745/12 and date of approval 28 April 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from all participants to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction in the Abstract. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

References

  1. Wendelboe, A.M.; Raskob, G.E. Global Burden of Thrombosis: Epidemiologic Aspects. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Konstantinides, S.V.; Barco, S.; Lankeit, M.; Meyer, G. Management of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 976–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Zhang, Q.; Abideen, Z.U.; Shan, K.S.; Yoon, T.; Farooq, M. A Silent Fatal Presentation of Pulmonary Embolism: Reflection and Discussion. Cureus 2020, 12, e8813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Bontekoe, E.; Brailovsky, Y.; Hoppensteadt, D.; Bontekoe, J.; Siddiqui, F.; Newman, J.; Iqbal, O.; Reed, T.; Fareed, J.; Darki, A. Upregulation of Inflammatory Cytokines in Pulmonary Embolism Using Biochip-Array Profiling. Clin. Appl. Thromb./Hemost. 2021, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Branchford, B.; Carpenter, S.L. The role of inflammation in venous thromboembolism. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Segalo, S.; Kiseljakovic, E.; Papic, E.; Joguncic, A.; Pasic, A.; Sahinagic, M.; Lepara, O.; Sporisevic, L. The Role of Hemogram-derived Ratios in COVID-19 Severity Stratification in a Primary Healthcare Facility. Acta Inform. Med. 2023, 31, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Çakir, E.; Turan, I.Ö. Which Hemogram-Derived Ratios Might Be Useful in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes of Sepsis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit? Cukurova Med. J. 2021, 46, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Buse Balci, S.; Aktas, G. A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Hemogram Derived Inflammatory Markers in Gastrointestinal Conditions. Iran. J. Color. Res. 2022, 10, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gok, M.; Kurtul, A. A novel marker for predicting severity of acute pulmonary embolism: Systemic immune-inflammation index, Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2021, 55, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Podlipaeva, A.A.; Mullova, I.S.; Pavlova, T.V.; Ushakova, E.V.; Duplyakov, D.V. Novel biological markers for the diagnosis and prediction of mortality risk in patients with pulmonary embolism. Russ. J. Cardiol. 2020, 25, 4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Arbănași, E.M.; Mureșan, A.V.; Arbănași, E.M.; Kaller, R.; Cojocaru, I.I.; Coșarcă, C.M.; Russu, E. The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio’s Predictive Utility in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review. J. Cardiovasc. Emergencies 2022, 8, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Galliazzo, S.; Nigro, O.; Bertù, L.; Guasti, L.; Grandi, A.M.; Ageno, W.; Dentali, F. Prognostic role of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2018, 13, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Telo, S.; Kuluöztürk, M.; Deveci, F.; Kirkil, G. The relationship between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and pulmonary embolism severity in acute pulmonary embolism. Int. Angiol. 2019, 38, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Slajus, B.; Brailovsky, Y.; Darwish, I.; Fareed, J.; Darki, A. Utility of Blood Cellular Ratios in the Risk Stratification of Patients Presenting with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 27, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Ertem, A.G.; Yayla, C.; Acar, B.; Kirbas, O.; Unal, S.; Sener, M.U.; Akboga, M.K.; Efe, T.H.; Sivri, S.; Sen, F.; et al. Relation between lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and short-term mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clin. Respir. J. 2018, 12, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Bryce, Y.C.; Perez-Johnston, R.; Bryce, E.B.; Homayoon, B.; Santos-Martin, E.G. Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A pictorial essay for the interventional radiologist. Insights Imaging 2019, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Watts, J.A.; Marchick, M.R.; Kline, J.A. Right ventricular heart failure from pulmonary embolism: Key distinctions from chronic pulmonary hypertension. J. Card. Fail. 2010, 16, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Sullivan, A.E.; Holder, T.A.; Beckman, J.A.; Green, C.L.; Patel, M.R.; Fortin, T.A.; Jones, W.S. Utility of electrocardiographic findings in acute pulmonary embolism. Eur. Heart J. Open 2023, 3, oead121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Novicic, N.; Dzudovic, B.; Subotic, B.; Shalinger-Martinovic, S.; Obradovic, S. Electrocardiography changes and their significance during treatment of patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2020, 9, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Daniel, K.R.; Courtney, D.M.; Kline, J.A. Assessment of cardiac stress from massive pulmonary embolism with 12-lead electrocardiography. Chest 2001, 120, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Shopp, J.D.; Stewart, L.K.; Emmett, T.W.; Kline, J.A. Findings from 12-lead electrocardiography that predict circulatory shock from pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2015, 22, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Iles, S.; LeHeron, C.J.; Davies, G.; Turner, J.G.; Beckert, L.E. ECG score predicts those with the greatest percentage of perfusion defects due to acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Chest 2004, 125, 1651–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.-J.; Harjola, V.-P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jiménez, D.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 543–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Pfeil, A.; Schmidt, P.; Hermann, R.; Böttcher, J.; Wolf, G.; Hansch, A. Parenchymal and pleural findings in pulmonary embolism visualized by multi-channel detector computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2010, 51, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Lee, E.Y.; Zurakowski, D.; Diperna, S.; d’Almeida Bastos, M.; Strauss, K.J.; Boiselle, P.M. Parenchymal and pleural abnormalities in children with and without pulmonary embolism at MDCT pulmonary angiography. Pediatr. Radiol. 2010, 40, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Thoma, P.; Rondelet, B.; Mélot, C.; Tack, D.; Naeije, R.; Gevenois, P.A. Acute pulmonary embolism: Relationships between ground-glass opacification at thin-section CT and hemodynamics in pigs. Radiology 2009, 250, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Panjwani, A.; Zaid, T.; Alawi, S.; Al Shehabi, D.; Abdulkarim, E.S. Pleural effusion in acute pulmonary embolism in Bahrain: Radiological and pleural fluid characteristics. Lung India 2019, 36, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Klok, F.A.; van der Bijl, N.; de Roos, A.; Kroft, L.J.M.; Huisman, M.V. Is pulmonary embolism associated with reactive mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy? Thromb. Res. 2010, 125, 557–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, M.; Mattar, G.; Abdulkarim, J. Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Using a 20% Reduction in Contrast Medium Dose Delivered in a Multiphasic Injection. World J. Radiol. 2017, 9, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Rodríguez-Núñez, N.; Gude, F.; Ferreiro, L.; Landín-Rey, E.; Carreiras-Cuiña, M.; Otero, B.; Carbajales, M.C.; Martínez-Martínez, H.J.; Díaz-Louzao, C.; Soto-Feijoo, R.; et al. Pleural effusion in acute pulmonary embolism: Characteristics and relevance. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2024, 11, e002179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Hansell, D.M.; Bankier, A.A.; MacMahon, H.; McLoud, T.C.; Müller, N.L.; Remy, J. Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging. Radiology 2008, 246, 697–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Jarman, A.F.; Mumma, B.E.; Singh, K.S.; Nowadly, C.D.; Maughan, B.C. Crucial considerations: Sex differences in the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in non-pregnant adult patients. J. Am. Coll. Emerg. Physicians Open 2021, 2, e12378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Safa, M.; Sarra, M.; Imen, N.; Sonia, H.; Hajer, R.; Nawelet, C. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Neutrophil-Platelet Ratio during Covid-19 infection: Association with the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, PA3888. [Google Scholar]
  34. Abou-Ismail, M.Y.; Diamond, A.; Kapoor, S.; Arafah, Y.; Nayak, L. The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and management. Thromb. Res. 2020, 194, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Afzal, A.; Noor, H.A.; Gill, S.A.; Brawner, C.; Stein, P.D. Leukocytosis in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1999, 115, 1329–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Huang, C.M.; Lin, Y.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Chang, S.L.; Lo, L.W.; Hu, Y.F.; Chiang, C.E.; Wang, K.L.; Chen, S.A. Risk stratification and clinical outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 44, 1110–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Bucek, R.A.; Reiter, M.; Quehenberger, P.; Minar, E. C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2002, 119, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Abul, Y.; Karakurt, S.; Ozben, B.; Toprak, A.; Celikel, T. C-reactive protein in acute pulmonary embolism. J. Investig. Med. 2011, 59, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Najarro, M.; Rodríguez, C.; Morillo, R.; Jara-Palomares, L.; Vinson, D.R.; Muriel, A.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Yusen, R.D.; Bikdeli, B.; Jimenez, D. C-reactive Protein and Risk of Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Mortality in Patients with Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2024, 60, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, R.; Miao, X.; Sun, S.; Liang, G.; Chu, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, X.; Guo, Q.; et al. IL (Interleukin)-6 Contributes to Deep Vein Thrombosis and Is Negatively Regulated by miR-338-5p. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Bompard, F.; Monnier, H.; Saab, I.; Tordjman, M.; Abdoul, H.; Fournier, L.; Sanchez, O.; Lorut, C.; Chassagnon, G.; Revel, M.-P. Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2001365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Alessi, J.V.; Ricciuti, B.; Alden, S.L.; Bertram, A.A.; Lin, J.J.; Sakhi, M.; Nishino, M.; Vaz, V.R.; Lindsay, J.; Turner, M.M.; et al. Low peripheral blood derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) is associated with increased tumor T-cell infiltration and favorable outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2021, 9, e003536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Meinel, F.G.; Nance, J.W.; Schoepf, U.J.; Hoffmann, V.S.; Thierfelder, K.M.; Costello, P.; Goldhaber, S.Z.; Bamberg, F. Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 747–759.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Koçak, N.D.; Tutar, N.; Çil, G.; Afşin, E.; Şentürk, A.; Aydın, D.; Mermit, B.; Parmaksız, E.T.; Çolak, M.; Yıldırım, E.; et al. The Prevalence of Previous Coronavirus Disease-19 in Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Its Effect on Embolism Severity. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the multivariate ordinal logistic regression model with the degree of PTE as the dependent variable.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the multivariate ordinal logistic regression model with the degree of PTE as the dependent variable.
Medicina 61 01830 g001
Figure 2. Individual predictor of PTE severity from the multivariate model (represented by blue circles). The red dashed lines represent the mean for age and the median for Daniel score and dNLR values.
Figure 2. Individual predictor of PTE severity from the multivariate model (represented by blue circles). The red dashed lines represent the mean for age and the median for Daniel score and dNLR values.
Medicina 61 01830 g002
Table 1. The correlation of investigated variables with pulmonary embolism.
Table 1. The correlation of investigated variables with pulmonary embolism.
VariablesPTE Patients
n = 69
Control Group
n = 69
p-Value
Sex, n (%)
-male
-female
46 (66.7%)
23 (33.3%)
46 (66.7%)
23 (33.3%)
1.000
Age, mean ± sd54.9 ± 11.8 55.3 ± 11.60.833
Daniel score, median (range)5 (0–21)0 (0–11)<0.001
WBC, mean ± sd10.5 ± 3.37.1 ± 2.1<0.001
Neutrophils, median (range)7.5 (1.8–18.2)3.4 (2.0–9.7)<0.001
IL 6, median (range)30.1 (2.7–358.7)1.5 (1.5–13.3)<0.001
CRP, median (range)48.1 (1.6–254.3)1.3 (0.6–109.0)<0.001
SII, median (range) 821.1 (208.5–11,946.0)391.3 (145.4–913.8)<0.001
NLR score, median (range)5.3 (1.2–53.5)1.6 (0.8–3.7)<0.001
PLR score, median (range)124.5 (17.5–905.0)113.3 (44.1–213.5)0.063
dNLR score, median (range)3.0 (0.9–21.4)1.1 (0.62–2.5)<0.001
NPR score, median (range)0.038 (0.009–0.378)0.015 (0.007–0.046)<0.001
LMR score, median (range)2.3 (0.3–6.4)3.7 (2.0–7.3)<0.001
Table 2. PTE location, parenchymal and pleural inflammatory findings on CTPA.
Table 2. PTE location, parenchymal and pleural inflammatory findings on CTPA.
Variablesn = 62(%)
PTE location
Both main braches2235.5
One of the main branches (L or R)1422.6
Lobar PTE1829.0
Segmental PTE812.9
Parenchymal and pleural inflammatory findings
Ground-glass opacity3048.4
Pleural effusion
-unilateral
-bilateral
17
4
27.4
6.5
Consolidation1829.0
Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy1930.6
Table 3. Univariate ordinal logistic regression with degree of PTE as dependent variable.
Table 3. Univariate ordinal logistic regression with degree of PTE as dependent variable.
VariablesUnivariate Ordinal Logistic Regression
OR (95%CI) p-Value
Sex (Male/Female)1.10 (0.43–2.78)0.842
Age1.04 (0.99–1.08)0.077
Daniel’s score1.22 (1.10–1.36)<0.001
WBC1.05 (0.92–1.20)0.458
Neutrophils1.1 (0.95–1.27)0.221
IL 61.01 (0.99–1.01)0.182
CRP1.01 (0.99–1.01)0.116
SII1.00012 (0.99989–1.00035)0.315
NLR1.08 (1.01–1.16)0.036
PLR1.002 (0.999–1.004)0.258
dNLR1.25 (1.06–1.48)0.009
NPR143.2 (0–4,278,016.4)0.345
LMR0.79 (0.55–1.12)0.179
Ground-glass opacity2.04 (0.8–5.21)0.135
Pleural effusions:
-unilateral
-bilateral
1.96 (0.68–5.66)
1.06 (0.16–7.06)
0.216
0.953
Mediastinal and hilar
lymphadenopathy
0.86 (0.27–2.76)0.806
Consolidation1.23 (0.44–3.38)0.695
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uzelac, B.; Jakovljević, V.; Živković, V.; Janković, J.; Lazarević, K.; Marković, D.; Laban-Lazović, M.; Jovanović, A.; Đikić, M.; Gujaničić, D.; et al. Prognostic Value of Initial Inflammatory Biomarkers, ECG Findings, and Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity. Medicina 2025, 61, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101830

AMA Style

Uzelac B, Jakovljević V, Živković V, Janković J, Lazarević K, Marković D, Laban-Lazović M, Jovanović A, Đikić M, Gujaničić D, et al. Prognostic Value of Initial Inflammatory Biomarkers, ECG Findings, and Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity. Medicina. 2025; 61(10):1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uzelac, Bojana, Vladimir Jakovljević, Vladimir Živković, Jelena Janković, Katarina Lazarević, Danilo Marković, Marija Laban-Lazović, Andrija Jovanović, Marina Đikić, Dušica Gujaničić, and et al. 2025. "Prognostic Value of Initial Inflammatory Biomarkers, ECG Findings, and Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity" Medicina 61, no. 10: 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101830

APA Style

Uzelac, B., Jakovljević, V., Živković, V., Janković, J., Lazarević, K., Marković, D., Laban-Lazović, M., Jovanović, A., Đikić, M., Gujaničić, D., Milićević-Nešić, I., & Stanković, S. (2025). Prognostic Value of Initial Inflammatory Biomarkers, ECG Findings, and Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Severity. Medicina, 61(10), 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101830

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop