Comparison of Type I and Type III Collagen Concentration between Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus in Relation to Skin Scaffolding
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation and Sterilization
2.2. Microbiological Analysis
2.3. Histochemical Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. Microbiological Analysis
3.2. Collagen Type I Histochemical Analysis
3.3. Collagen Type III Histochemical Analysis
3.4. Collagen I/III Ratio
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- WHO. Burns. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns (accessed on 3 January 2021).
- Burkey, B.; Besner, G.E. Burns. In Fundamentals of Pediatric Surgery; Mattei, P., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 153–168. [Google Scholar]
- Elijah, I.E.; Komak, S.; Finnerty, C.C.; Herndon, D.N. Pediatric burns. In Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: Volume 4: Peri-Operative Care of the Critically Ill or Injured Child; Wheeler, D.S., Wong, H.R., Shanley, T.P., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2014; pp. 277–286. [Google Scholar]
- Jeschke, M.G.; van Baar, M.E.; Choudhry, M.A.; Chung, K.K.; Gibran, N.S.; Logsetty, S. Burn injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Motamed, S.; Taghiabadi, E.; Molaei, H.; Sodeifi, N.; Hassanpour, S.E.; Shafieyan, S.; Azargashb, E.; Farajzadeh-Vajari, F.; Aghdami, N.; Bajouri, A. Cell-based skin substitutes accelerate regeneration of extensive burn wounds in rats. Am. J. Surg. 2017, 214, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haddad, A.G.; Giatsidis, G.; Orgill, D.P.; Halvorson, E.G. Skin Substitutes and Bioscaffolds: Temporary and Permanent Coverage. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2017, 44, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoon, J.; Yoon, D.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Jo, S.; Kym, D.; Yim, H.; Hur, J.; Chun, W.; Kim, G.; et al. Wound healing ability of acellular fish skin and bovine collagen grafts for split-thickness donor sites in burn patients: Characterization of acellular grafts and clinical application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 205, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, R., 2nd; Saathoff, E.C.; Larson, D.A.; Wall, J.T.; Wienandt, N.A.; Magnusson, S.; Kjartansson, H.; Natesan, S.; Christy, R.J. Accelerated Wound Closure of Deep Partial Thickness Burns with Acellular Fish Skin Graft. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jana, S.; Datta, P.; Das, H.; Ghosh, P.R.; Kundu, B.; Nandi, S.K. Engineering Vascularizing Electrospun Dermal Grafts by Integrating Fish Collagen and Ion-Doped Bioactive Glass. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 734–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, R.; Lin, C.; Lin, Z.; Chen, H.; Lu, W.; Lin, C.; Li, H. Approaches to cutaneous wound healing: Basics and future directions. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 374, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathangi Ramakrishnan, K.; Babu, M.; Mathivanan Jayaraman, V.; Shankar, J. Advantages of collagen based biological dressings in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns in children. Ann. Burns Fire Disasters 2013, 26, 98–104. [Google Scholar]
- Sugiura, H.; Yunoki, S.; Kondo, E.; Ikoma, T.; Tanaka, J.; Yasuda, K. In Vivo Biological Responses and Bioresorption of Tilapia Scale Collagen as a Potential Biomaterial. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2009, 20, 1353–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Ritch, R.; Lin, S.; Ni, M.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Lu, Y.; Lai, H.; Lin, F.-H. A new fish scale-derived scaffold for corneal regeneration. Eur. Cells Mater. 2010, 19, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, A.P.N.N.; Verde, M.E.Q.L.; Fereira Júnior, A.E.C.; Silva, P.G.B.; Feitosa, V.P.; Júnior, E.M.L.; de Miranda, M.J.B.; de Filho, M.O.M. Avaliação microscópica, estudo histoquímico e análise de propriedades tensiométricas da pele de tilápia do Nilo. Rev. Bras. Queimaduras 2015, 14, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Lau, C.S.; Hassanbhai, A.; Wen, F.; Wang, D.; Chanchareonsook, N.; Goh, B.T.; Yu, N.; Teoh, S. Evaluation of decellularized tilapia skin as a tissue engineering scaffold. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2019, 13, 1779–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alves, A.P.N.N.; Júnior, E.M.L.; Piccolo, N.S.; de Miranda, M.J.B.; Verde, M.E.Q.L.; Júnior, A.E.C.F.; Silva, P.G.D.B.; Feitosa, V.P.; de Bandeira, T.J.P.G.; Mathor, M.B.; et al. Study of tensiometric properties, microbiological and collagen content in nile tilapia skin submitted to different sterilization methods. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018, 19, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, B.A.; Lima Júnior, E.M.; de Moraes Filho, M.O.; Fechine, F.V.; de Moraes, M.E.A.; Silva Júnior, F.R.; do Nascimento Soares, M.F.A.; Rocha, M.B.S. Use of Tilapia Skin as a Xenograft for Pediatric Burn Treatment: A Case Report. J. Burn Care Res. 2019, 40, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima Júnior, E.M.; de Moraes Filho, M.O.; Costa, B.A.; Fechine, F.V.; Alves, A.P.N.N.; de Moraes, M.E.A.; Rocha, M.B.S.; Silva Júnior, F.R. Pediatric Burn Treatment Using Tilapia Skin as a Xenograft for Superficial-Partial Thickness Wounds: A Pilot Study. J. Burn Care Res. 2020, 41, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basavaraja, N.; Raghavendra, C.H. Hormonal sex reversal in red tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus and Oreochromis mossambicus) and inheritance of body colour in O. mossambicus and red tilapia: Implications for commercial farming. Aquac. Int. 2017, 25, 1317–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valenzuela-Rojo, D.R.; López-Cervantes, J.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I. Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) Collagen for Medical Biomaterials, Seaweed Biomaterials, Sabyasachi Maiti, IntechOpen. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/61471 (accessed on 2 March 2020).
- Center for Invasive Species Solutions Australia Tilapia Mossambica. Available online: https://pestsmart.org.au/toolkit-resource/biology-and-ecology-of-mozambique-tilapia-oreochromis-mossambicus/ (accessed on 2 March 2021).
- Atwa, E.I. Bacteriological Study of Fish Samples Collected from Different Markets in Some Egyptian Governorates and Antimicrobial Sensitivity of Isolates. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 2765–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Chaumont, F.; Dallongeville, S.; Chenouard, N.; Hervé, N.; Pop, S.; Provoost, T.; Meas-Yedid, V.; Pankajakshan, P.; LeComte, T.; Le Montagner, Y.; et al. Icy: An open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Huang, K. Structural Characteristics of Extracted Collagen from Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) Bone: Effects of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Solution and Hydrochloric Acid Treatment. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menezes, M.D.L.L.R.; Ribeiro, H.L.; Flávia de Oliveira, M.; de Andrade Feitosa, J.P. Optimization of the collagen extraction from Nile tilapia skin (Oreochromis niloticus) and its hydrogel with hyaluronic acid. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 189, 110852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, H.; Lista, A.; Siekapen, M.M.; Ghaffari-Bohlouli, P.; Nie, L.; Alimoradi, H.; Shavandi, A. Fish Collagen: Extraction, Characterization, and Applications for Biomaterials Engineering. Polymers 2020, 12, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bi, C.; Li, X.; Xin, Q.; Han, W.; Shi, C.; Guo, R.; Shi, W.; Qiao, R.; Wang, X.; Zhong, J. Effect of extraction methods on the preparation of electrospun/electrosprayed microstructures of tilapia skin collagen. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2019, 128, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strong, A.L.; Neumeister, M.W.; Levi, B. Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering: Regeneration of the Skin and Its Contents. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2017, 44, 635–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamamoto, T.; Iwase, H.; King, T.W.; Hara, H.; Cooper, D.K. Skin xenotransplantation: Historical review and clinical potential. Burns 2018, 44, 1738–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oryan, A.; Alemzadeh, E.; Moshiri, A. Burn wound healing: Present concepts, treatment strategies and future directions. J. Wound Care 2017, 26, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto, K.; Igawa, K.; Sugimoto, K.; Yoshizawa, Y.; Yanagiguchi, K.; Ikeda, T.; Yamada, S.; Hayashi, Y. Biological Safety of Fish (Tilapia) Collagen. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 630757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; He, C.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, S.; Mo, X. Evaluation of biocompatibility and immunogenicity of micro/nanofiber materials based on tilapia skin collagen. J. Biomater. Appl. 2019, 33, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.; Saito, T. Biocompatibility of Novel Type I Collagen Purified from Tilapia Fish Scale: An In Vitro Comparative Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 139476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mei, F.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Duan, Z.; Chen, M.; Meng, K.; Chen, S.; Shen, X.; Xia, G.; Zhao, M. Collagen Peptides Isolated from Salmo salar and Tilapia nilotica Skin Accelerate Wound Healing by Altering Cutaneous Microbiome Colonization via Upregulated NOD2 and BD14. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima Júnior, E.M.; De Moraes Filho, M.O.; Costa, B.A.; Rohleder, A.V.P.; Sales Rocha, M.B.; Fechine, F.V.; Forte, A.J.; Alves, A.P.N.N.; Silva Júnior, F.R.; Martins, C.B.; et al. Innovative Burn Treatment Using Tilapia Skin as a Xenograft: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Burn Care Res. 2020, 41, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, K.; Wang, L.; He, X.; Li, W.; Han, L.; Qin, S. Application of Tilapia Skin Acellular Dermal Matrix to Induce Acute Skin Wound Repair in Rats. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 9, 792344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gauza-Włodarczyk, M.; Kubisz, L.; Mielcarek, S.; Włodarczyk, D. Comparison of thermal properties of fish collagen and bovine collagen in the temperature range 298–670 K. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 80, 468–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zain, N.M.; Saidin, S.; Sosiawan, A. Properties of Tilapia Collagen as a Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering: A Review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 932, p. 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Na, G.C. Interaction of calf skin collagen with glycerol: Linked function analysis. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Penkova, R.; Goshev, I.; Gorinstein, S.; Nedkov, P. Stabilizing effect of glycerol on collagen type I isolated from different species. Food Chem. 1999, 66, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herson, M.R.; Hamilton, K.; White, J.; Alexander, D.; Poniatowski, S.; O’connor, A.J.; Werkmeister, J.A. Interaction of preservation methods and radiation sterilization in human skin processing, with particular insight on the impact of the final water content and collagen disruption. Part I: Process validation, water activity and collagen changes in tissues. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018, 19, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.-K. Absorption of glycerol and its effects on the physical properties of a collagen material: Leather. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 87, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lattouf, R.; Younes, R.; Lutomski, D.; Naaman, N.; Godeau, G.; Senni, K.; Changotade, S. Picrosirius red staining: A useful tool to appraise collagen networks in normal and pathological tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2014, 62, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, C.; Barker, J.; Bleiker, T.; Chalmers, R.; Creamer, D. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology, 9th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2016; Volume 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, A.J.; Boyce, S.T. Burn Wound Healing and Tissue Engineering. J. Burn Care Res. 2017, 38, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Groups | Intervention | Time |
---|---|---|
1 | Fat and muscle scrapping and 0.9% saline wash (Natural state) | N/A |
2 | 2 × 2% Chlorhexidine baths + Solution: 50% Glycerol–49% Saline (0.9%) 1% PMF (Penicillin + Metronidazole + Fluconazole solution) + | 2 × 30 min 24 h at 4 °C |
3 | Solution: 75% Glycerol–24% Saline (0.9%) 1% PMF + | 3 h at 37 °C |
4 | Solution: 99% Glycerol–1% PMF | 3 h at 37 °C |
Sterilization | (I) Type | (J) Type | Mean Difference (I–J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||
Natur | Niloticus | Mosambicus | −106.683 * | 43.154 | 0.017 | −193.547 | −19.818 |
50% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 107.243 | 68.461 | 0.124 | −30.562 | 245.048 |
75% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 20.591 | 99.001 | 0.836 | −178.687 | 219.869 |
99% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 267.085 * | 112.275 | 0.022 | 41.087 | 493.083 |
Type | Sterilization Stage | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
Niloticus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | −303.084 * | 43.812 | <0.001 | −391.273 | −214.894 |
75% Glycerol | −246.303 * | 63.687 | <0.001 | −374.498 | −118.107 | ||
99% Glycerol | −689.578 * | 71.680 | <0.001 | −833.862 | −545.294 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | 56.781 | 66.035 | 0.394 | −76.141 | 189.703 | |
99% Glycerol | −386.494 * | 77.439 | <0.001 | −542.371 | −230.618 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | −443.275 * | 87.093 | <0.001 | −618.584 | −267.967 | |
Mossambicus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | −89.158 | 56.562 | 0.122 | −203.011 | 24.695 |
75% Glycerol | −119.029 | 82.220 | 0.154 | −284.529 | 46.471 | ||
99% Glycerol | −315.810 * | 92.538 | 0.001 | −502.080 | −129.540 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | −29.871 | 85.251 | 0.728 | −201.473 | 141.731 | |
99% Glycerol | −226.652 * | 99.973 | 0.028 | −427.887 | −25.416 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | −196.781 | 112.436 | 0.087 | −423.103 | 29.542 |
Sterilization | (I) Type | (J) Type | Mean Difference (I–J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||
Natur | Niloticus | Mosambicus | −255.257 * | 30.623 | <0.001 | −316.899 | −193.616 |
50% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | −106.039 * | 45.942 | 0.026 | −198.515 | −13.563 |
75% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | −109.035 * | 43.777 | 0.016 | −197.153 | −20.917 |
99% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 49.084 | 44.883 | 0.280 | −41.261 | 139.428 |
Type | Sterilization Stage | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
Niloticus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | −100.379 * | 28.407 | 0.001 | −157.559 | −43.199 |
75% Glycerol | −160.451 * | 34.668 | <0.001 | −230.233 | −90.669 | ||
99% Glycerol | −179.153 * | 33.035 | <0.001 | −245.648 | −112.657 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | −60.072 | 31.775 | 0.065 | −124.032 | 3.887 | |
99% Glycerol | −78.774 * | 27.496 | 0.006 | −134.121 | −23.427 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | −18.702 | 23.347 | 0.427 | −65.697 | 28.293 | |
Mossambicus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | 48.840 | 36.673 | 0.190 | −24.979 | 122.659 |
75% Glycerol | −14.229 | 44.756 | 0.752 | −104.317 | 75.860 | ||
99% Glycerol | 125.188 * | 42.648 | 0.005 | 39.343 | 211.033 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | −63.069 | 41.021 | 0.131 | −145.640 | 19.503 | |
99% Glycerol | 76.348 * | 35.497 | 0.037 | 4.896 | 147.801 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | 139.417* | 30.141 | <0.001 | 78.747 | 200.087 |
Sterilization | (I) Type | (J) Type | Mean Difference (I–J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||
Natur | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 0.280 * | 0.066 | <0.001 | 0.147 | 0.412 |
50% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 0.394 * | 0.088 | <0.001 | 0.217 | 0.571 |
75% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 0.221 | 0.110 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.443 |
99% Glycerol | Niloticus | Mosambicus | 0.198 | 0.168 | 0.244 | −0.140 | 0.535 |
Type | Sterilization Stage | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
Niloticus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | −0.297 * | 0.072 | <0.001 | −0.441 | −0.153 |
75% Glycerol | −0.049 | 0.069 | 0.480 | −0.189 | 0.090 | ||
99% Glycerol | −0.646 * | 0.115 | <0.001 | −0.877 | −0.415 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | 0.248 * | 0.087 | 0.006 | 0.073 | 0.422 | |
99% Glycerol | −0.349 * | 0.112 | 0.003 | −0.575 | −0.123 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | −0.597 * | 0.122 | <0.001 | −0.842 | −0.351 | |
Mossambicus | Natur | 50% Glycerol | −0.182 | 0.092 | 0.054 | −0.368 | 0.003 |
75% Glycerol | −0.108 | 0.089 | 0.234 | −0.288 | 0.072 | ||
99% Glycerol | −0.728 * | 0.148 | <0.001 | −1.026 | −0.429 | ||
50% Glycerol | 75% Glycerol | 0.075 | 0.112 | 0.508 | −0.151 | 0.300 | |
99% Glycerol | −0.545 * | 0.145 | <0.001 | −0.837 | −0.253 | ||
75% Glycerol | 99% Glycerol | −0.620 * | 0.157 | <0.001 | −0.937 | −0.303 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ciornei, B.; Vaduva, A.; David, V.L.; Popescu, D.; Vulcanescu, D.D.; Adam, O.; Avram, C.R.; Pacurari, A.C.; Boia, E.S. Comparison of Type I and Type III Collagen Concentration between Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus in Relation to Skin Scaffolding. Medicina 2023, 59, 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061002
Ciornei B, Vaduva A, David VL, Popescu D, Vulcanescu DD, Adam O, Avram CR, Pacurari AC, Boia ES. Comparison of Type I and Type III Collagen Concentration between Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus in Relation to Skin Scaffolding. Medicina. 2023; 59(6):1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061002
Chicago/Turabian StyleCiornei, Bogdan, Adrian Vaduva, Vlad Laurentiu David, Diana Popescu, Dan Dumitru Vulcanescu, Ovidiu Adam, Cecilia Roberta Avram, Alina Cornelia Pacurari, and Eugen Sorin Boia. 2023. "Comparison of Type I and Type III Collagen Concentration between Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus in Relation to Skin Scaffolding" Medicina 59, no. 6: 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061002