You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Photios Anninos1,*,
  • Adam Adamopoulos1 and
  • Nikolia Anninou2
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The following suggestions may increase the merit of the manuscript

  1. The Introduction could be expanded to provide a better background and establish the rationale for the study.
  2. The Discussion section could be expanded to highlight the novelty and significance of the findings and observations presented in the study. 
  3. The Abstract could be rephrased and rewritten such that it better represents and embodies the essence of the manuscript. 
  4. The Methods could be described in a relatively greater detailed manner.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The discussion should be very short, detailed and comparative studies should be included.

2. References are too old.

If these are done properly, the work can be accepted.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx