Next Article in Journal
Percutaneous Navigation under Local Anesthesia for Computed Tomography-Guided Microwave Ablation of Malignant Liver Lesions Located in the Hepatic Dome
Next Article in Special Issue
Absence of Wharton’s Jelly at the Abdominal Site of the Umbilical Cord Insertion. Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Colocasia antiquorum var. Esculenta Extract In Vitro and In Vivo against Periodontal Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Maternal Obesity on Cell-Free Fetal DNA and Blood Pressure Regulation in Pregnancies with Hypertensive Disorders
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Spontaneous Hepatic Rupture Associated with HELLP Syndrome: A Case Report

Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1055; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101055
by In-Chul Nam 1,†, Jung-Ho Won 2,†, Sungbin Kim 1, Kyungsoo Bae 1, Kyung-Nyeo Jeon 1, Jin-Il Moon 1, Eun Cho 1, Ji-Eun Park 3, Jae-Yool Jang 4 and Sung-Eun Park 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2021, 57(10), 1055; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101055
Submission received: 20 September 2021 / Accepted: 24 September 2021 / Published: 2 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Risk Pregnancy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have significantly revised the manuscript. This is a very informative and well-written case report.

Reviewer 2 Report

No comments

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very instructive and well-written case report, and deserves to be published. In order to make it a better paper, I suggest the following modifications.

  1. The “Introduction” session is too long. Most of the content should be included in the "Discussion" section. The introduction is just an appetizer, so to speak. If readers are full from the appetizer alone, they will not be able to taste the main dish.
  2. In the end, it was the right decision, but why did authors choose to have a C-section instead of vaginal delivery?
  3. Was the anesthesia a general anesthesia?
  4. Did authors noticed the intraabdominal bleeding by pre-operative transabdominal ultrasound?
  5. Please describe the possible cause of the fetal death.
  6. Are there any pathological examination of placenta? Microscopical findings of placenta would be informative.

Author Response

Reviewer #1:

1) The “Introduction” session is too long. Most of the content should be included in the "Discussion" section. The introduction is just an appetizer, so to speak. If readers are full from the appetizer alone, they will not be able to taste the main dish.

 

Response: We would like to thank you for your valuable comment and agree with your suggestion. We are happy to inform you that we have now simplified the introduction in our revised manuscript to increase readability.

Reviewer 2 Report

I suggest you to change the description of the time window. Instead of: "....weeks after the patient had been discharged..." I suggest: ".... weeks after the TAE...".  Change everywhere in the text.

Author Response

Reviewer #2:

1) I suggest you to change the description of the time window. Instead of: "....weeks after the patient had been discharged..." I suggest: ".... weeks after the TAE...".  Change everywhere in the text.

Response: We would like to thank you for your valuable comment. We are happy to inform you that we have now changed the descriptions of the time window as suggested (Lines: 116,117, 126-129).

 

Back to TopTop