Next Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of Honey- and Essential Oil-Based Structured Systems for Skin Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Muscarinic Receptor Signaling Processes in Specific Aspects of Morphine-Induced Respiratory Depression in Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 and Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Drug-Resistant Pathogens

by
Ghaida Saud Aljohani
* and
Saleh H. Salmen
*
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(7), 1102; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071102
Submission received: 1 July 2026 / Revised: 12 July 2026 / Accepted: 15 July 2026 / Published: 17 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The study addresses the global health challenge posed by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, highlighting the urgent need for alternative antimicrobial solutions. This study investigated the in vitro antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of endophytic mediated-synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Methods: An endophytic bacterium was isolated from the medicinal plant Commiphora gileadensis in Saudi Arabia and identified as Bacillus subtilis CG1 through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The bacterium was utilized for the green synthesis of AgNPs, as confirmed by Ultraviolet-visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy. AgNPs characterization was done using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM and SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). The antimicrobial efficacy of the fabricated AgNPs was tested against eight clinically relevant pathogens using standard in vitro assays such as the agar disk diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal and fungicidal concentrations (MBC and MFC). Additionally, AgNPs were tested for antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis. Tested pathogens included Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Candida auris, Candida albicans, and Candida tropicalis. The antibiofilm efficacy was tested using the Crystal violet assay. Results: UV–Vis spectroscopy confirmed AgNP formation with a characteristic absorption peak at 412 nm. FTIR analysis identified the presence of hydroxyl, nitrile, and alkyne functional groups, which are involved in nanoparticle reduction and stabilization. TEM and SEM revealed predominantly spherical AgNPs with sizes ranging from 17 to 72 nm, while EDX confirmed silver as the major elemental component. DLS analysis showed a Z-average particle size of 113.9 ± 67.75 nm and a zeta potential of −24.2 mV. The synthesized AgNPs exhibited concentration-dependent antimicrobial activity, producing inhibition zones of 10–20 mm at 240 µg/mL. MIC values ranged from 6.25 to 25 µg/mL, whereas MBC and MFC values ranged from 6.25 to 50 µg/mL and 25 to 100 µg/mL, respectively. Moreover, bacterial growth kinetics analysis demonstrated a concentration-dependent inhibition of growth by AgNPs at MIC and sub-MIC concentrations. Additionally, AgNPs demonstrated significant antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis. Conclusions: Overall, B. subtilis CG1-mediated AgNPs exhibited promising physicochemical properties and antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities, suggesting their potential as alternatives for combating resistant and biofilm-associated infections.

1. Introduction

Antibiotic resistance constitutes a significant challenge for the population. Global resistance is influenced by variables including overpopulation, increased global migration, and widespread antibiotic use [1]. Nowadays, antibiotics are the primary method for addressing microbial infections. Regrettably, the emergence of diseases exhibiting increasing antibiotic resistance has signaled the conclusion of the antibiotic discovery era. The persistent failure to develop or discover new antibiotics and irresponsible prescribing are key risk factors contributing to antibiotic resistance [2]. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, following the discovery of penicillin, researchers have persistently sought to develop novel antibiotics to combat bacterial infections caused by bacteria or candida that have developed resistance to current antibiotics [3]. The persistent development of resistance to antimicrobial drugs results in the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter species comprise the group abbreviated as “ESKAPE,” which are the primary agents of nosocomial infections [4]. In addition, Candida spp. are among the significant opportunistic fungal pathogens responsible for healthcare-associated infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and those undergoing extended antibiotic treatment [5,6]. These diseases, especially invasive candidiasis and candidemia, are linked to considerable morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses [6,7]. Prevalent pathogenic species include Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, and the developing multidrug-resistant Candida auris [5]. Recent investigations indicate concerning resistance rates in C. auris, highlighting extensive resistance to fluconazole and diminished susceptibility to other antifungal classes [5,6]. Novel antimicrobial drugs are necessary for overcoming the resistance of these microbes. Consequently, researchers have investigated the antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) to combat that resistance [8,9,10,11].
“Nanoparticles” denotes aggregates of atoms or molecules that assemble into solid and colloidal particles, nano-capsules, and nano-spheres, each exhibiting distinct shapes and dimensions. The dimensions and shape of nanoparticles influence their physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, with diminutive nanoparticles enhancing surface area [12]. Nanoparticles possess diverse uses in the fields of research and medicine. The biosynthesis and production of nanoparticles via bacterial endophytes have emerged as innovative technologies owing to their multifaceted functionality, potential bioactivity, nonpathogenic characteristics, and significant therapeutic utility [13].
Various techniques have been established for the synthesis of AgNPs, among which green synthesis stands out for its ability to yield environmentally advantageous products while minimizing organic waste generation [14]. Bacteria are regarded as very efficient agents for the environmentally friendly synthesis of nanoparticles, especially silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). They synthesize several biomolecules, including enzymes, proteins, and polysaccharides, which function as reducing agents to promote nanoparticle production [15]. The bacterial synthesis of AgNPs offers a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional chemical and physical approaches, as it obviates the necessity for hazardous chemicals and energy-intensive processes, hence promoting eco-friendly nanoparticle production and application [16].
Endophytic bacteria are a category of endosymbiotic microorganisms that reside within their plant hosts, fostering a mutually beneficial connection. They offer a host of advantages without compromising other areas of the plant or inducing negative effects. The majority of bacterial endophytes exert beneficial effects, such as the synthesis of bioproducts, phytohormones, and enzymes with diverse applications. They are considered attractive candidates for biological management as natural antagonists. Employing bioproducts generated by microorganisms, including endophytic bacteria, as an alternate method to reduce reliance on synthetic materials and an effective strategy to address pathogen resistance [13].
Commiphora gileadensis (Bisham), naturally found in the western and southwestern parts of Saudi Arabia, is regarded as one of the most important medicinal plants of the Arabian Peninsula. Research on Saudi populations of this plant revealed that its extracts contain high levels of flavonoids, terpenoids, phenolics, and volatile oils, all of which contribute to notable biological properties. Alhazmi et al. [17] found that methanolic extracts of C. gileadensis showed potent antibacterial activity against clinically significant pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, while also enhancing wound healing. In another Saudi investigation, Al-Abdallat et al. [18] analyzed leaves, seeds, callus tissues, and cell suspension cultures, reporting considerable antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities linked to elevated levels of secondary metabolites.
New opportunities for the development of innovative nanomaterials with a broad spectrum of applications are presented by the synthesis of nanoparticles through endophytic intervention. Some endophytic bacteria have developed a unique defense mechanism to combat metal ion toxicity. This method generates nanoparticles by precipitating metal ions at the nanoscale. Certain endophytic bacteria have demonstrated the ability to survive and flourish in environments with elevated metal ion concentrations. Bacteria present a possible avenue for nanoparticle synthesis due to their exceptional ability to transform metal ions into nanoparticles. Endophyte-mediated nanoparticles may exhibit biological effects including antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, cytotoxic, and seed germination properties. Nanoparticles synthesized by endophytic bacteria represent a promising strategy due to their diverse biological activities, encompassing antibacterial effects and antibiofilm properties [13].
In this context, the aim of the current study was to isolate and identify endophytic bacteria that are able to biosynthesize AgNPs and assess their antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities against several multidrug-resistant pathogens.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Endophytic Bacteria

2.1.1. Morphological and Biochemical Identification

Endophytic bacteria were isolated from Commiphora gileadensis collected from Al Mulaylih, Madinah region, Saudi Arabia (site: 24.8287354, 39.1490872). The bacterial isolate recovered from C. gileadensis was characterized using morphological and biochemical analyses. Phenotypic characteristics revealed that the isolate was a Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium exhibiting typical Bacillus-like morphology (Figure 1). The isolate was catalase-positive and capable of endospore formation. Furthermore, it demonstrated positive starch hydrolysis.

2.1.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogeny of Endophytic Bacteria

The endophytic bacterial isolate was successfully identified through molecular identification using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Sequence analysis demonstrated that the isolate was identified as Bacillus subtilis strain CG1 (GenBank accession no.: PZ666008.1). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed utilizing sequencing data from GenBank for strains exhibiting a high percentage of similarity to our strain. (Figure 2).

2.2. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

The green synthesis of AgNPs through the reduction of silver nitrate using Bacillus subtilis CG1 supernatant was monitored by observing the color change from light yellow to dark brown (Figure 3). The reaction was conducted under temperature 60 °C and pH 10.

2.3. Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

2.3.1. UV Spectral Analysis

AgNPs synthesis was confirmed using UV–Visible spectrophotometry. The AgNPs exhibited characteristic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption band within the range of 400–420 nm (Figure 4).

2.3.2. FTIR Spectrometer

The FTIR spectra of B. subtilis-AgNPs exhibited several unique absorption bands within the spectrum range of 4000–400 cm−1 (Figure 5), verifying the existence of diverse functional groups. An extensive absorption band was detected at around 3710 cm−1, signifying O–H stretching vibrations of unbound hydroxyl groups. Additional bands detected in the ranges of 2205–2156 cm−1 and 2011–1950 cm−1 were assigned to C≡N/C≡C and C≡C stretching vibrations, respectively, signifying the existence of nitrile, alkyne, and associated functional groups.

2.3.3. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed the successful formation of AgNPs in the tested sample. As shown in Figure 6A, the nanoparticles synthesized by B. subtilis CG1 appeared spherical with noticeable aggregation forming clusters, and their size ranged from 17.567 to 72.631 nm (Figure 6B).

2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray (EDX)

The nanoparticles fabricated by B. subtilis CG1 were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEM-1011) paired with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. SEM imaging was utilized to analyze the surface morphology and structural characteristics of the nanoparticles, as illustrated in Figure 7A. In parallel, EDX analysis provided qualitative and quantitative data regarding the elemental composition of the synthesized materials, verifying the existence of 77.17% silver and 22.83% chloride, which were involved in the synthesis process. Figure 7B presents the spectra displaying separate characteristic peaks for silver (Ag) at 2.983 keV and chloride (Cl) at 2.621 keV. The spectra displayed a strong signal for silver, validating a successful synthesis of AgNPs.

2.3.5. Zeta Size and Potential Determination

Zeta potential analysis and dynamic light scattering (DLS) were used to examine the surface charge and particle size distribution of the biosynthesized AgNPs produced by B. subtilis CG1 (Figure 8). Overall, the synthesized nanoparticles showed negative zeta potential values and a nanoscale size dispersion, suggesting that the bacterial isolate successfully biosynthesized comparatively stable and widely distributed AgNPs. For B. subtilis-AgNPs, the zeta potential value was −24.2 mV, while the Z-average particle size was 113.9 ± 67.75 nm. The main peak in the intensity distribution appeared at 95.07 ± 23.93 nm, with a Polydispersity Index (PDI) value of 0.354. These findings confirm that B. subtilis CG1 was capable of synthesizing AgNPs with nanoscale dimensions and varying degrees of colloidal stability.

2.4. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of AgNPs

2.4.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the biosynthesized AgNPs from B. subtilis CG1 exhibited a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect against all tested bacterial strains (Figure 9). The selected AgNPs concentrations (240, 160, and 80 µg/mL) were chosen based on previously reported studies evaluating nanoparticle antibacterial activity against clinically relevant multidrug-resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The highest concentration (240 µg/mL) demonstrated the strongest antibacterial activity, with inhibition zones ranged from 10–16 mm, followed by 8–12 mm at the concentration (160 µg/m), while the lowest concentration (80 µg/mL) exhibited comparatively reduced activity 7–9 mm, its effect was inconsistent across the tested bacterial strains, demonstrating inhibitory activity against some strains while showing no observable effect on others.

2.4.2. Anticandidal Activity

In addition to their antibacterial activity, the fabricated nanoparticles demonstrated inhibitory effects against C. albicans, C. auris, and C. tropicalis (Figure 10), as evidenced by the formation of clear inhibition zones ranging from 15–20 mm at the highest AgNPs concentration (240 µg/mL), followed by 160 µg/mL, with inhibition zones ranging from 12–16 mm, while the lowest concentration (80 µg/mL) showed the smallest inhibition zones, ranging from 8–11 mm. Among the tested candidal species, C. albicans showed the highest susceptibility, while C. auris was the least. The observed anticandidal activity confirms the ability of the nanoparticles to suppress candidal growth.

2.4.3. MIC, MBC and MFC

The MIC, MBC, and MFC of the biosynthesized AgNPs, derived from B. subtilis CG1, were evaluated against the multidrug-resistant bacterial and candidal strains mentioned above. Microbial growth in the MIC assay was assessed visually based on turbidity. The obtained results demonstrated that the antibacterial and anticandidal activity of AgNPs varied depending on the tested microbial strain (Table 1 and Table 2). Overall, MIC values ranged from 6.25 to 25 µg/mL for bacterial strains and 25 µg/mL for all Candida species, while MBC and MFC values ranged from 6.25 to 50 µg/mL and from 25 to 100 µg/mL, respectively.

2.4.4. Bacterial Growth Kinetics

Concentrations corresponding to MIC, 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, and 1/8 MIC values were used to assess the impact of B. subtilis-AgNPs on bacterial growth kinetics, which were previously determined for each bacterial strain. In general, the growth curves showed that the inhibitory effect of AgNPs against all the bacteria tested was concentration dependent (Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15). The treated cultures with MIC concentrations showed the highest degree of reduction in bacterial growth, either with complete inhibition or with significant suppression of growth throughout the incubation period. Conversely, bacterial cultures treated with sub-MIC concentrations showed different extents of growth retardation by delaying the onset of growth, reducing the growth rates and optical density values compared to the untreated controls. These observations agree with the MIC and MBC results. The gradual recovery of bacterial growth at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, and 1/8 MIC confirms the concentration-dependent antibacterial activity of AgNPs. The following figures provide detailed growth curves that illustrate the impact of each concentration on the tested bacterial strains.

2.4.5. Antibiofilm Activity

The antibiofilm activity of the AgNPs, derived from B. subtilis CG1, was evaluated against one Gram-positive bacterium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and one Gram-negative bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using both inhibition and eradication assays at the same concentrations. The AgNPs demonstrated a concentration-dependent reduction in biofilm biomass, where higher activity was observed at MIC, followed by gradual reduction at lower sub-MIC concentrations among the bacterial strains (Figure 16 and Figure 17).
Biofilm Inhibition
AgNPs derived from B. subtilis CG1 exhibited significant inhibitory effect on biofilm formation at sub-inhibitory concentrations of MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC. For S. epidermidis, B. subtilis-AgNPs exhibited markedly high inhibition percentages compared to P. aeruginosa. At MIC, inhibition value was consistently high, reaching approximately 86%. Even at 1/2 MIC, inhibition remained substantial, approximately 84%, with a gradual decline at 1/4 and 1/8 MIC, yet still maintaining notable activity >70%. In contrast, P. aeruginosa showed lower susceptibility. At MIC, inhibition value was approximately 54%. This activity decreased progressively at lower concentrations, reaching approximately 28% at 1/8 MIC.
Biofilm Eradication
In contrast to inhibition assay, B. subtilis-AgNPs showed reduced efficacy in eradicating preformed biofilms when applied at the same concentrations. For S. epidermidis, eradication at MIC reached approximately 83%. Even at 1/2 MIC, eradication remained high, approximately 79%, followed by moderate reductions at 1/4 and 1/8 MIC. Conversely, eradication of P. aeruginosa biofilms was notably lower. At MIC, eradication value was approximately 40%, decreasing to 29% at 1/8 MIC.

3. Discussion

In response to the growing global challenge of antibiotic resistance, the search for alternative antimicrobial and antibiofilm agents has become increasingly important. In this study, AgNPs were biosynthesized using B. subtilis CG1, an endophytic bacterial isolate obtained from C. gileadensis, which was collected from Al Mulaylih, Madinah region, Saudi Arabia. The biological activities of B. subtilis-AgNPs were evaluated against several pathogenic and multidrug-resistant (MDR) microbial strains. The results demonstrated notable antimicrobial efficacy of the synthesized nanoparticles, highlighting their potential as a promising therapeutic agent and supporting the need for further in vivo investigations.
Endophytic microorganisms are bacteria that inhabit the plants’ internal tissues without causing harm, often forming beneficial associations with their hosts [19]. In the present work, one endophytic bacterial isolate was identified; it was associated with Bacillus-related taxa within plant tissues. This finding aligns with recent studies emphasizing the importance of endophytic bacteria as integral components of the plant microbiome, contributing to plant health, growth, and stress resilience [20].
The ecological success of Bacillus species as endophytes can be attributed to their distinctive physiological and structural traits. These Gram-positive, spore-forming bacteria are capable of producing highly resistant endospores, enabling survival under adverse environmental conditions such as desiccation, temperature fluctuations, and nutrient scarcity [21]. This resilience likely explains their persistence within plant tissues and their frequent isolation in endophytic studies. Furthermore, a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites, such as lipopeptides, antibiotics, and hydrolytic enzymes, are known to be produced by Bacillus species. That molecules contribute to plant growth promotion and the biological control of various pathogens [22,23,24].
In the present study, the isolate was closely related to Bacillus subtilis CG1, with sequence similarity values exceeding 99%. This species is widely recognized as a model plant-associated bacterium and has been extensively studied for its plant growth-promoting and biocontrol capabilities [25]. Endophytic bacteria are recognized for producing distinctive secondary metabolites that can serve as effective reducing and capping agents, thereby enhancing nanoparticle stability and enabling controlled size distribution [26]. This likely accounts for the efficient synthesis and stability of the nanoparticles observed in the present study. The findings further demonstrate that AgNP biosynthesis by B. subtilis CG1 is strongly influenced by physicochemical parameters, particularly temperature and pH. B. subtilis-AgNPs are highly dependent on environmental conditions, with optimal production achieved at 60 °C and pH 10. The results are consistent with earlier reports and emphasize the importance of parameter optimization in enhancing the efficiency, stability, and reproducibility of green nanoparticle synthesis [27,28].
The observed color change was further validated by UV–Vis spectrophotometric analysis. Synthesized nanoparticles displayed a characteristic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak within the range of approximately 400–420 nm, confirming the formation of AgNPs. The higher absorbance intensity recorded under optimal conditions reflects an increased nanoparticle concentration, which corresponds with the darker coloration observed visually [29].
The FTIR spectra of the fabricated nanoparticles revealed a broad distribution of functional groups spanning both the high-frequency region (4000–400 cm−1) and the fingerprint region (2000–400 cm−1), indicating the involvement of diverse biomolecules derived from the bacterial extract. The broad bands observed in the region of ~3800–3500 cm−1 are attributed to O–H Free hydroxyl groups, suggesting the presence of hydroxyl-containing compounds. That group is well known to participate in the reduction of metal ions through electron donation mechanisms [30,31]. The presence of these functional groups across the fabricated nanoparticles indicates that the bacterial extract provides a complex biochemical environment facilitating nanoparticle formation via a green synthesis pathway. Overall, the FTIR findings confirm that hydroxyl, nitriles, alkynes, and oxygenated functional groups are primarily responsible for the reduction and stabilization processes. These results are highly consistent with previous studies demonstrating that microbial-mediated nanoparticle synthesis involves synergistic interactions among multiple biomolecular constituents.
Morphological characterization using TEM demonstrated that B. subtilis-AgNPs were predominantly spherical, with particle sizes within the nanoscale range from 17–72 nm and exhibited improved dispersion under optimal conditions. Likewise, SEM analysis confirmed the nanoscale structure and surface morphology of the particles, which appeared generally well-dispersed with slight aggregation. The apparent aggregation observed in the TEM images may be attributed to localized particle clustering within the selected imaging field and to the sample preparation and drying process during TEM analysis. In addition, the larger particle size measured by DLS compared with TEM is expected, which DLS measures the hydrodynamic diameter of nanoparticles in suspension, whereas TEM measures the dry particle size [28,31].
Elemental composition analysis using EDX further validated the successful formation of AgNPs. A prominent characteristic peak corresponding to silver (Ag) was detected at about 3 keV, which is indicative of metallic silver [32]. Additionally, signals for chlorine (Cl) were also observed, likely originating from organic biomolecules present in the bacterial extracts that serve as reducing and stabilizing agents during biosynthesis [28,33]. The distinct silver peak, along with these supporting elemental signals, confirms the effective bio-reduction of Ag+ ions and the successful synthesis of AgNPs.
Zeta potential analysis further supported the stability of B. subtilis-AgNPs. The nanoparticles produced under optimal conditions exhibited a negative zeta potential value, indicating good colloidal stability as a result of electrostatic repulsion between particles [34]. This negative surface charge is commonly attributed to the presence of biomolecules such as polysaccharides and proteins that act as capping and stabilizing agents during biosynthesis [28].
The present study demonstrates that B. subtilis-AgNPs exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant bacterial and candidal strains, with efficacy strongly influenced by microbial species. Among the tested bacteria, E. coli showed the highest susceptibility, with the lowest MIC and MBC values recorded. This enhanced sensitivity may be attributed to the structural characteristics of Gram-negative bacteria, where the outer membrane facilitates nanoparticle interaction and penetration, leading to increased intracellular damage [35]. Previous investigations have revealed similar results that demonstrate strong activity of AgNPs against E. coli [36]. In contrast, MRSA and S. epidermidis exhibited comparatively higher MIC and MBC values. This may be explained by the thicker peptidoglycan layer in Gram-positive bacteria, which can act as a physical barrier limiting the penetration of nanoparticle. Additionally, resistance mechanisms in these strains may further reduce nanoparticle susceptibility. Notably, B. subtilis-AgNPs demonstrated high antibacterial activity, which may be attributed to favorable physicochemical properties enhancing their reactivity and cellular interaction. The close MIC and MBC values observed indicate a bactericidal mode of action, suggesting that the nanoparticles do not merely inhibit bacterial growth but actively induce cell death. This effect is typically linked to various mechanisms, including the loss of cell membrane integrity, the formation of ROS, and interactions with intracellular macromolecules such as proteins and DNA [37].
Alongside the antibacterial efficacy of the produced AgNPs, their antifungal potential was further screened against the three Candida species. The nanoparticles exhibited significant anticandidal activity against all the isolates tested, as evidenced by clear zone of inhibition around the treated samples. Responses to nanoparticle exposure were species-dependent as evidenced by differences in susceptibility among the tested species which C. albicans showing the highest susceptibility, while C. auris was the least. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the concentrations of AgNPs tested (p < 0.05), indicating that the antifungal effect was dependent on the concentration, with higher concentrations of nanoparticles causing greater inhibition of growth of the Candida species tested. These observations suggest that the biosynthesized AgNPs possess a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity not only against bacterial pathogens but also against fungal microorganisms. Earlier studies have reported similar observations, showing the antifungal activity of AgNPs against clinically important and drug-resistant Candida species [38,39]. Multiple modes of action may account for the antifungal efficacy of AgNPs. Silver nanoparticles can compromise the integrity of fungal cell membranes, enhance membrane permeability, and trigger the release of intracellular contents, ultimately leading to cell death [11]. Furthermore, AgNPs induce the production of ROS, resulting in oxidative stress that damages proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [40]. AgNPs can also interact with biomolecules containing sulfur and phosphorus, disrupting vital metabolic processes and DNA replication, thus inhibiting fungal growth [10]. The activity of AgNPs against resistant Candida species further underlines their potential as alternative antifungal agents that can overcome conventional resistance mechanisms.
The bacterial growth kinetics results were in accordance with the MIC and MBC results, confirming the antibacterial efficacy of the synthesized AgNPs. Cultures exposed to concentrations equivalent to the MIC showed a marked suppression of growth, while sub-MIC concentrations resulted in varying degrees of growth delay and decrease in bacterial density. Comparable findings have been documented in earlier studies evaluating the antibacterial activity mediated by nanoparticles. Exposure to nanoparticles delayed the lag phase and reduced the specific growth rate of bacterial cells. The concentration-dependent inhibition observed in the current study indicates the continuous stress of AgNPs on the bacterial populations, thus limiting their ability to multiply and establish normal growth patterns. These results further support the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities shown by the MIC and MBC assays. Wang et al. [41] also obtained similar results, showing that antimicrobial treatments that produced low MIC and MBC values also significantly altered bacterial growth curves and inhibited bacterial growth. Similarly, El-Habib et al. [42] reported that exposure to nanoparticles resulted in decreased specific growth rates, extended lag phases, and increased antibacterial activity in a concentration-dependent manner.
Biofilm formation is a key determinant in the persistence and resistance of bacterial infections, as biofilm-embedded cells exhibit markedly higher tolerance to antimicrobial agents compared to planktonic counterparts. The complex structure of biofilms, driven by an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, acts as a barrier that limits antimicrobial penetration and reduces treatment efficacy. Consequently, targeting both biofilm formation and established biofilms has become an important strategy in controlling biofilm-associated infections. In this context, AgNPs have attracted considerable attention due to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties. In the present study, B. subtilis-AgNPs exhibited notable antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa. The obtained results demonstrated clear variation in activity depending on the bacterial strain. Both biofilm inhibition and eradication assays showed effective activity, indicating that B. subtilis-AgNPs are capable of interacting with different stages of biofilm development. The difference in susceptibility between the tested bacterial strains is consistent with previously reported findings. S.epidermidis, as a Gram-positive bacterium, exhibited higher sensitivity compared to P. aeruginosa, which is strongly known for its ability to form biofilms and intrinsic resistance mechanisms. The outer membrane structure and dense extracellular matrix of P. aeruginosa biofilms contribute significantly to its increased tolerance against antimicrobial agents [43]. The observed antibiofilm activity of B. subtilis-AgNPs can be explained by its multiple mechanisms of action. Previous studies have shown that silver nanoparticles can compromise bacterial cell membranes, produce ROS, and obstruct vital cellular functions, in addition to affecting biofilm structure and matrix integrity [44]. Furthermore, AgNPs have been reported to interfere with quorum sensing pathways, thereby reducing bacterial communication and limiting biofilm development [43]. Overall, the present findings agree with earlier studies demonstrating the effectiveness of AgNPs as antibiofilm agents. The ability of the synthesized nanoparticles to act on both developing and established biofilms highlights their potential application in controlling biofilm-associated infections, particularly considering their versatile mechanisms of action and strain-dependent efficacy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Collection and Identification

Healthy medicinal plant Commiphora gileadensis was collected from Al Mulaylih, Madinah region, Saudi Arabia, in February 2026 (site: 24.8287354, 39.1490872). Samples of different parts, such as stems, leaves, and roots, were collected in sterilized closed bags and were transported on the same day to the microbiology research laboratory in the Botany and Microbiology department, King Saud University, for the isolation of endophytic bacteria. Samples of plants were taxonomically authenticated, and a voucher specimen was deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Botany and Microbiology, King Saud University (KSUH-R.A. Baseni 3159).

4.2. Isolation of Pure Culture of Endophytic Bacteria

The plant was gently washed multiple times with sterile distilled water to remove adhering soil and debris. For surface sterilization, the sample was first treated with 70% (v/v) ethanol for 60 s, followed by immersion in 3% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for 2 min, and then re-treated with 70% (v/v) ethanol for an additional 60 s. To eliminate any residual NaClO, the sample was rinsed several times with sterile distilled water (dH2O). All sterilization procedures were carried out under aseptic conditions [45].
Sterilized plant segments were then aseptically placed onto Petri dishes containing Nutrient Agar (NA) medium. Each sample was plated in duplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Following incubation, emerging bacterial colonies were repeatedly subcultured onto fresh media to obtain pure isolates. The purified bacterial cultures were subsequently preserved at −20 °C in 30% glycerol stocks until further use [46].

4.3. Identification of Endophytic Bacterium

4.3.1. Morphological and Biochemical Identification

For morphological characterization, the bacterial isolate was streaked onto Nutrient Agar (NA) plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Colony characteristics, such as morphology, dimensions, margin, color, elevation, and surface texture, were recorded. A microscopic examination was subsequently performed utilizing freshly cultivated samples [47]. Standard identification protocols were executed in line with Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [48]. Gram staining was performed in accordance with standard methods [49]. Catalase activity was assessed by the conventional hydrogen peroxide assay [47,50]. Starch hydrolysis was assessed by inoculating bacterial colonies onto starch agar plates and incubating them at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Endospore staining was conducted with the Schaeffer–Fulton technique to assess the isolates’ spore production capability [47]. All morphological and biochemical results for isolated bacteria were documented and utilized as initial identification criteria before molecular characterization.

4.3.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogeny of Endophytic Bacteria

Molecular identification was conducted using sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, a highly conserved genetic marker extensively utilized for bacterial taxonomy and phylogenetic research [51,52]. Fresh cultures preserved in glycerol stock were sent to Macrogen Inc. in Seoul, Republic of Korea, for genetic analysis. The service encompassed genomic DNA extraction and PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene with universal bacterial primers; the forward 16S-27F primer (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′), and the reverse 16S-1492R primer (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′); purification of PCR products, and bidirectional sequencing to ensure sequence accuracy and coverage of approximately 1500 base pairs [51]. Raw sequencing reads were assembled into consensus contigs and subjected to similarity analysis. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn web server) was used to compare the resultant sequences with reference sequences stored in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database [53]. Taxonomic identification was assigned based on the highest percentage similarity, query coverage, and E-value (approaching 0.0). In accordance with commonly accepted thresholds in bacterial taxonomy, a sequence similarity value of ≥98% was considered indicative of close relatedness at the species level, while values below this threshold were interpreted cautiously and reported as closely related species [54,55]. Additionally, Mega 11 program was utilized to perform phylogenetic analysis using the data sequence acquired by Macrogen Inc. Reference sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, which represent the most closely related species found by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn web server) analysis, were used to build the phylogenetic tree.

4.4. Preparation of the Cell-Free Supernatant of Bacillus subtilis CG1

To obtain cell-free supernatant (CFS), Bacillus subtilis CG1 was cultured in 250 mL of Nutrient Broth medium and incubated at 37 °C for three days. Following incubation, the culture was centrifuged in a Model J2-21 centrifuge (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C in order to separate the supernatant. To guarantee total elimination of bacterial cells, the collected supernatant was run through a 0.22 µm membrane filter [56]. 100 µL of the CFS was spread onto Nutrient Agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to verify the lack of contamination. The sterile CFS was subsequently stored at 4 °C until further use in the biosynthesis of AgNPs.

4.5. Biosynthesis of AgNPs Using Supernatant of Bacillus subtilis CG1

Biosynthesis of AgNP was performed using 50 mL of Bacillus subtilis CG1 supernatant that was added to 450 mL of a 3 mM aqueous AgNO3 solution in a 750 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Preliminary tests were conducted under different pH and temperature conditions. Based on these preliminary observations, pH 10 and 60 °C were selected as the optimum conditions for AgNP biosynthesis and used in all subsequent experiments. The reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 10 using sterile 1 N NaOH prior to incubation at 60 °C. The flask was incubated in a rotary shaker at 150 rpm for 72 h in darkness to avoid the photoreduction of silver ions. The control sample was created under identical conditions. The treatment was conducted in triplicate. The successful production of nanoparticles was evidenced by a color transition from pale yellow to dark brown. The synthesized AgNPs were recovered using centrifugation at 15,000× g for 20 min, purified by washing twice with sterile double-distilled water (ddH2O), and subsequently kept at −80 °C for further analysis [57].

4.6. Characterization of AgNPs Synthesized Using Bacillus subtilis CG1

The characterization of biosynthesized AgNPs was conducted following the method of Elias et al. [58], with minor modifications, utilizing various techniques. UV–Vis spectroscopy was employed to assess optical density from 200 to 800 nm for evaluation of AgNP synthesis, using a 6705 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Jenway, Stone, Staffordshire, UK). The functional groups in AgNPs were determined using FTIR spectroscopy in the 4000–400 cm−1 range (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA). The morphology and mean dimensions of the AgNPs were assessed utilizing transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1011, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Samples were produced and processed following the manufacturer’s instructions. The chemical composition and elemental composition of AgNPs were measured using a JSM-6380 LA SEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray (EDX). The size distribution and surface charge of the synthesized AgNPs from the supernatant of Bacillus subtilis CG1 were measured using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). The average size and surface charge of the AgNPs were determined using a Zetasizer (ZS 90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, Worcestershire, UK).

4.7. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of AgNPs

4.7.1. Microbial Cultures

Eight drug-resistant microbial strains obtained from the Microbiology Lab of the Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, were used in this study. Microbial cultures included five bacterial strains, which are Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ATCC 43300), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 21584). Additionally, three candidal species were tested, including Candida albicans (ATCC 60193), Candida auris (ATCC 5130), and Candida tropicalis (ATCC 66029). All microbes were sub-cultured on suitable agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h prior to experimentation to ensure viability, purity, and optimal growth conditions.

4.7.2. Preparation of AgNPs Stock Solution

Stock solution of the synthesized AgNPs was prepared by accurately weighing 0.020 g of each dried nanoparticle sample using an analytical balance, followed by dissolution in 5 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to obtain a final concentration of 400 µg/mL. The suspension was initially vortexed to ensure preliminary mixing. To achieve uniform dispersion and minimize nanoparticle aggregation, the suspension was subjected to ultrasonic treatment using a probe sonicator (Sonics Vibra-Cell, Sonics & Materials Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) for 10 min under aseptic conditions. Sonication was performed in pulse mode, 5 s ON/5 s OFF, to enhance dispersion efficiency while preventing excessive heating. Following sonication, the AgNPs suspension appeared homogeneous with no visible aggregates, indicating effective dispersion. Following sonication, serial two-fold dilutions were prepared in sterile PBS to obtain a total of ten concentrations suitable for antimicrobial and antibiofilm assays. The dilution series included 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, 1.562, and 0.781 µg/mL, prepared under aseptic conditions to evaluate the concentration-dependent activity of the nanoparticles. AgNPs suspension and dilutions were freshly prepared prior to each experiment to ensure consistency and stability.

4.7.3. Disk Diffusion Method

The antibacterial efficacy of the biosynthesized nanoparticles was assessed via agar disk diffusion method, adhering to conventional protocols with slight modifications [59]. For the antibacterial activity assay, fresh bacterial suspensions were prepared in sterile saline (0.95% NaCl) and calibrated to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Using a sterilized glass bacterial spreader, the suspensions were then evenly spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates to create a confluent bacterial lawn. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles were impregnated onto sterile filter paper disks (6 mm diameter) at concentrations of 240, 160, and 80 µg/mL. Ciprofloxacin 5 µg was used as the positive control, whereas sterile saline (0.95% NaCl) served as the negative control. The cell-free supernatant of Bacillus subtilis CG1, employed in nanoparticle synthesis, was independently assessed to determine its intrinsic antibacterial activity compared to the fabricated nanoparticles. All prepared disks were left to dry under aseptic conditions prior to being carefully positioned onto the inoculated agar surface with adequate spacing. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for a duration of 18 to 24 h. Next, a calibrated ruler was used to measure the zones of inhibition surrounding the disks in millimeters.
The synthesized nanoparticles were assessed for anticandidal efficacy against three candidal species using the same methodology. The Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) medium was enriched with 0.5 µg/mL methylene blue and 2% glucose, subsequently inoculated with standardized candidal solutions, and then treated with nanoparticles at the same concentrations employed for bacterial strains. Clotrimazole at 33 µg/mL was used as the positive control, whereas the negative control was the same as above. All experiments were performed in triplicate to guarantee accuracy.

4.7.4. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC)

Following the method outlined by Loo et al. [60] with minimal modifications, the MIC, MBC, and MFC of the biosynthesized AgNPs were assessed in sterile 96-well microtiter plates using the standard broth microdilution technique. Microbial inoculates originated from fresh cultures, standardized to a 0.5 McFarland (~1 × 108 CFU/mL), and subsequently diluted to attain a final working concentration of nearly 1 × 106 CFU/mL. Two-fold serial dilutions of the AgNP were conducted in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) to achieve concentrations from 400 to 0.781 µg/mL. To achieve the required final inoculum, equal amounts of the standardized microbial suspensions were thereafter added to each well. Wells with microbial suspension devoid of AgNPs served as growth controls, whilst wells containing purely broth were designated as sterility controls. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. After incubation, microbial growth was assessed visually depending on turbidity; clear wells signified growth inhibition, whereas cloudy wells showed microbial multiplication. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of AgNPs that resulted in no observable growth. To determine MBC and MFC, aliquots (10–20 µL) from wells exhibiting no apparent growth were subcultured onto Mueller–Hinton agar plates and incubated under identical conditions. The MBC and MFC were determined to be the minimal concentrations that produced no observable colony formation, signifying total bactericidal and fungicidal efficacy. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results were presented as consistent values across independent replicates.

4.7.5. Bacterial Growth Kinetics

In accordance with El-Habib et al. [42], bacterial growth kinetics were evaluated to determine the effect of B. subtilis-AgNPs on bacterial proliferation at inhibitory and sub-inhibitory concentrations. Untreated cultures were used as controls, and fresh bacterial suspensions were treated with AgNPs at concentrations corresponding to the MIC, 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, and 1/8 MIC values previously determined for each bacterial strain. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density (OD) at 630 nm at 3 h intervals for 12 h. The OD values obtained were used to plot growth curves and to evaluate the change in bacterial growth patterns under treatment with AgNPs.

4.7.6. Anti-Biofilm Activity

Biofilm Inhibition Assay
Bacterial suspensions were co-incubated with sub-inhibitory concentrations of the investigated AgNPs at 1 × MIC, 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, and 1/8 MIC, and maintained at 37 °C for 24 h to assess biofilm inhibition. After incubation, the wells were carefully rinsed three times with sterile PBS to eliminate non-adherent (planktonic) cells. The residual adhering biofilm was fixed using methanol, stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 15 min, and subsequently washed with distilled water. The residual stain was subsequently solubilized with 33% (v/v) acetic acid, and the absorbance was recorded at 630 nm using a microplate reader (MR-96A, Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). The biofilm inhibition percentage was calculated relative to the untreated control as follows:
%   Biofilm   inhibition   = O D   c o n t r o l O D   s a m p l e O D   c o n t r o l × 100
Biofilm Eradication Assay
In the biofilm eradication assay, biofilms were initially produced by incubating bacterial suspensions in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) enriched with 1% (w/v) glucose for 24 h under the same conditions. Subsequent to biofilm growth, the wells were carefully rinsed with PBS to exclude non-adherent cells, followed by the addition of fresh media containing the evaluated AgNPs. Similar nanoparticle concentrations (MIC, 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC, and 1/8 MIC) were utilized to facilitate direct comparison of biofilm inhibition and eradication effects. The plates were subsequently incubated for a further 24 h, followed by washing, crystal violet staining, and absorbance measurement as previously reported. The reduction in biofilm biomass was determined relative to untreated biofilm controls as follows:
%   Biofilm   eradication   = O D   c o n t r o l O D   t r e a t e d O D   c o n t r o l × 100
All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity results were obtained in triplicate, and significance (p < 0.05) was determined by comparing the means using a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 11.0.1 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., Boston, MA, USA).

5. Conclusions

This work is the first to describe the simple and environmentally friendly biosynthesis of AgNPs using endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 isolated from C. gileadensis plant in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, it demonstrates the first use of these biosynthesized AgNPs against pathogenic microbes such as MRSA, S. epidermidis, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, C. auris, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis.
For the fabrication of silver nanoparticles, the extracellular method, which is straightforward, quick, repeatable, and environmentally friendly was employed under optimal conditions of pH 10 and temperature 60 °C.
Techniques including UV-Vis spectroscopy, TEM, EDX, DLS, and FTIR were used to examine the AgNPs produced by Bacillus subtilis CG1. Comprehensive characterization confirmed the successful formation of nanoscale, predominantly spherical AgNPs, stabilized by biologically active functional groups that contribute to their structural integrity and functional performance.
AgNPs synthesis confirmed by UV-visible spectroscopy at a peak of 412 nm. TEM and SEM revealed predominantly spherical nanoparticles, averaging 17 to 72 nm in size, with a uniform distribution. EDX validated silver as a major component, while dynamic light scattering DLS indicated a zeta potential of −24.2 mV and a Z-average particle size of 113.9 ± 67.75 nm, demonstrating good colloidal stability.
Critically, the biosynthesized AgNPs demonstrated potent antibacterial and anticandidal activity against clinically relevant MDR pathogens, exhibiting a clear concentration-dependent effect, with inhibition zones ranging from 10 to 20 mm at the highest concentration (240 µg/mL). MIC values ranged from 6.25 to 25 µg/mL, while MBC and MFC ranged from 6.25 to 50 µg/mL and 25 to 100 µg/mL, respectively.
Moreover, bacterial growth kinetics analysis demonstrated a concentration-dependent inhibition of growth by AgNPs at MIC and sub-MIC concentrations.
Beyond planktonic inhibition, the nanoparticles showed pronounced antibiofilm efficacy, effectively suppressing biofilm formation and disrupting established biofilms, thereby directly targeting a key driver of chronic and treatment-resistant infections.
Collectively, these findings highlight the dual functionality of endophyte-mediated AgNPs as both antimicrobial and antibiofilm agents, positioning them as strong candidates for next-generation antimicrobial strategies. Their effectiveness against MDR pathogens, combined with their green synthesis and physicochemical stability, underscores their translational potential in biomedical and clinical applications.
The antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of the biosynthesized AgNPs revealed in this investigation are mostly comparable to those previously documented for AgNPs produced with conventional Bacillus strains. Comparable antimicrobial efficacy has been documented for AgNPs produced utilizing non-endophytic Bacillus isolates, affirming the capability of Bacillus species as effective biological nano-factories. Nevertheless, the majority of published investigations have been on previously identified laboratory-derived Bacillus strains, while reports of AgNP production utilizing the endophytic B. subtilis CG1 remain scarce. This study enhances existing knowledge by showing that a new strain of an endophytic B. subtilis isolated from Commiphora gileadensis can effectively serve as a biological source for the green synthesis of bioactive AgNPs with notable antibacterial and antibiofilm properties.
While the present findings demonstrate the promising antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of the biosynthesized AgNPs under in vitro conditions, future studies should focus on evaluating the long-term stability, in vivo efficacy, and biosafety of these AgNPs to further support their potential biomedical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; methodology, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; validation, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; formal analysis, G.S.A.; investigation, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; resources, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; data curation, G.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S.A.; writing—review and editing, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; visualization, G.S.A. and S.H.S.; supervision, S.H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AgNPsSilver Nanoparticles
MDRMulti-Drug Resistant
MRSAMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
TEMTransmission Electron Microscopy
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
EDXEnergy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
DLSDynamic Light Scattering
FTIRFourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
AgNO3Silver Nitrate
PBSPhosphate Buffered Saline
NANutrient agar
MHAMueller Hinton Agar
TSBTryptone Soy Broth
CFSCell-Free Supernatant
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration
MBCMinimum Bactericidal Concentration
MFCMinimum Fungicidal Concentration

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance Report 2025: WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS), 1st ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nathan, C. Antibiotics at the Crossroads. Nature 2004, 431, 899–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mohamedsalih, P.; Sabir, D. Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles with Antibiotics Against Clinically Isolated Acinetobacter baumannii. Passer 2020, 2, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Puca, V.; Marulli, R.Z.; Grande, R.; Vitale, I.; Niro, A.; Molinaro, G.; Prezioso, S.; Muraro, R.; Di Giovanni, P. Microbial Species Isolated from Infected Wounds and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis: Data Emerging from a Three-Years Retrospective Study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Evren, K.; Öncel, B.; Kömeç, S. Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida auris Strains. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 39, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khairy, A.; Hejres, S.; Elbahr, U.; Dayyab, F.; Delos Reyes, C.S.; Pastrana, J.A.; Vineeth, C.; Prem Sudha, S.; Keskin, O.; Singh Rana, S.; et al. Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida auris Strains: Analysis of Clinical Strains in a Tertiary-Care Educational University Hospital. New Microbiol. 2024, 47, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Ibe, C.; Otu, A.; Pohl, C.H. Mechanisms of Resistance to Cell Wall and Plasma Membrane Targeting Antifungal Drugs in Candida Species Isolated in Africa. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2025, 23, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mulani, M.S.; Kamble, E.E.; Kumkar, S.N.; Tawre, M.S.; Pardesi, K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hetta, H.F.; Al-Kadmy, I.M.S.; Khazaal, S.S.; Abbas, S.; Suhail, A.; El-Mokhtar, M.A.; Ellah, N.H.A.; Ahmed, E.A.; Abd-ellatief, R.B.; El-Masry, E.A.; et al. Antibiofilm and Antivirulence Potential of Silver Nanoparticles against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Verma, N.; Riyaz, M.; Kaur, G.; Negi, P.; Ghawri, H.; Raj, K. Anticandidal Efficacy of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Trans-himalayan Plant Extracts Against Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates of Candida auris. Indian J. Microbiol. 2024, 64, 1912–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ganesh Kumar, A.; Pugazhenthi, E.; Sankarganesh, P.; Muthusamy, C.; Rajasekaran, M.; Lokesh, E.; Khusro, A.; Kavya, G. Cleome rutidosperma Leaf Extract Mediated Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Anti-candidal, Anti-biofilm, Anti-cancer, and Molecular Docking Analysis. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2024, 14, 28971–28983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, N.; Bilal, M.; Khan, A.; Nguyen, T.A.; Gupta, R.K. (Eds.) Smart Polymer Nanocomposites: Design, Synthesis, Functionalization, Properties, and Applications; Micro and Nano Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Kidlington, UK; Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kandasamy, G.D.; Kathirvel, P. Insights into Bacterial Endophytic Diversity and Isolation with a Focus on Their Potential Applications—A Review. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 266, 127256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fahim, M.; Shahzaib, A.; Nishat, N.; Jahan, A.; Bhat, T.A.; Inam, A. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Influencing Factors, and Applications. JCIS Open 2024, 16, 100125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vanlalveni, C.; Ralte, V.; Zohmingliana, H.; Das, S.; Anal, J.M.H.; Lallianrawna, S.; Rokhum, S.L. A Review of Microbes Mediated Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Antimicrobial Activities. Heliyon 2024, 10, e32333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tarannum, N.; Divya, D.; Gautam, Y.K. Facile Green Synthesis and Applications of Silver Nanoparticles: A State-of-the-Art Review. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 34926–34948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alhazmi, A.; Aldairi, A.F.; Alghamdi, A.; Alomery, A.; Mujalli, A.; Obaid, A.A.; Farrash, W.F.; Allahyani, M.; Halawani, I.; Aljuaid, A.; et al. Antibacterial Effects of Commiphora gileadensis Methanolic Extract on Wound Healing. Molecules 2022, 27, 3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Al-Abdallat, A.M.; Adayileh, B.K.; Sawwan, J.S.; Shibli, R.; Al-Qudah, T.S.; Abu-Irmaileh, B.; Albdaiwi, R.N.; Almaliti, J.; Bustanji, Y. Secondary Metabolites Profiling, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Properties of Commiphora gileadensis L. Leaves, Seeds, Callus, and Cell Suspension Extracts. Metabolites 2023, 13, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ali, M.A.; Ahmed, T.; Ibrahim, E.; Rizwan, M.; Chong, K.P.; Yong, J.W.H. A Review on Mechanisms and Prospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Their Plant Growth-Promoting Activities. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kumar, A.; Chauhan, P.; Kumar, A.; Pooja; Mishra, T.; Padiyal, A.; Walia, Y.; Dhir, S.; Pandey, A.K. Latest Progress (2020–2024) in Bacterial Endophyte Research with Special Reference to Plant Disease Management: Achievements and Challenges. Discov. Plants 2025, 2, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nicholson, W.L.; Munakata, N.; Horneck, G.; Melosh, H.J.; Setlow, P. Resistance of Bacillus Endospores to Extreme Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 548–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus Lipopeptides: Versatile Weapons for Plant Disease Biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adjei, M.O.; Yu, R.; Cao, X.; Fan, B. The Mechanisms of Bacillus Subtilis as a Plant-Beneficial Rhizobacterium in Plant–Microbe Interactions. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kloepper, J.W.; Ryu, C.-M.; Zhang, S. Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacillus Spp. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Verma, V.C.; Kharwar, R.N.; Gange, A.C. Biosynthesis of Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles by The Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus clavatus. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Solís-Sandí, I.; Cordero-Fuentes, S.; Pereira-Reyes, R.; Vega-Baudrit, J.R.; Batista-Menezes, D.; Montes De Oca-Vásquez, G. Optimization of the Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Bacterial Extracts and Their Antimicrobial Potential. Biotechnol. Rep. 2023, 40, e00816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Singh, S.; Numan, A.; Somaily, H.H.; Gorain, B.; Ranjan, S.; Rilla, K.; Siddique, H.R.; Kesharwani, P. Nano-Enabled Strategies to Combat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 129, 112384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sati, A.; Ranade, T.N.; Mali, S.N.; Ahmad Yasin, H.K.; Pratap, A. Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs): Comprehensive Insights into Bio/Synthesis, Key Influencing Factors, Multifaceted Applications, and Toxicity—A 2024 Update. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 7549–7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Iravani, S. Green Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, M.; Swami, B.L.; Ikram, S. A Review on Plants Extract Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Applications: A Green Expertise. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Loh, X.J.; Ying, A.N.J.; Verma, N.K.; Beuerman, R.W.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Methods and Strategies for the Synthesis of Diverse Nanoparticles and Their Applications: A Comprehensive Overview. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105003–105037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Green Synthesis, Biomedical and Biotechnological Applications of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots. A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 703–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bhattacharjee, S. DLS and Zeta Potential—What They Are and What They Are Not? J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoparticles: Present Situation and Prospects for the Future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dakal, T.C.; Kumar, A.; Majumdar, R.S.; Yadav, V. Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Slavin, Y.N.; Asnis, J.; Häfeli, U.O.; Bach, H. Metal Nanoparticles: Understanding the Mechanisms behind Antibacterial Activity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Arsène, M.M.J.; Viktorovna, P.I.; Alla, M.; Mariya, M.; Nikolaevitch, S.A.; Davares, A.K.L.; Yurievna, M.E.; Rehailia, M.; Gabin, A.A.; Alekseevna, K.A.; et al. Antifungal Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Prepared Using Aloe vera Extract against Candida albicans. Vet. World 2023, 16, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Al Mutairi, J.F.; Al-Otibi, F.; Alhajri, H.M.; Alharbi, R.I.; Alarifi, S.; Alterary, S.S. Antimicrobial Activity of Green Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Different Extracts from the Leaves of Saudi Palm Tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Molecules 2022, 27, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Manisekaran, R.; Chettiar, A.R.; Marasamy, L.; Ibarra, V.C.; Lopez-Ayuso, C.A.; Chavez-Granados, P.A.; Kandasamy, G.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Arthikala, M. Silver-Nanoparticles-Based Composites for Antimicrobial Applications: An Update. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202403772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, Z.; Liang, X.; Deng, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Lin, F.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; et al. Studies on the Antibacterial Activity of the Antimicrobial Peptide Mastoparan X against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2025, 15, 1552872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. El-Habib, I.; Maatouk, H.; Lemarchand, A.; Dine, S.; Roynette, A.; Mielcarek, C.; Traoré, M.; Azouani, R. Antibacterial Size Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles and Their Role as Additives in Emulsion Waterborne Paint. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gurunathan, S.; Han, J.W.; Kwon, D.-N.; Kim, J.-H. Enhanced Antibacterial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of Silver Nanoparticles against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Barapatre, A.; Aadil, K.R.; Jha, H. Synergistic Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized by Lignin-Degrading Fungus. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2016, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Christakis, C.A.; Daskalogiannis, G.; Chatzaki, A.; Markakis, E.A.; Mermigka, G.; Sagia, A.; Rizzo, G.F.; Catara, V.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Studholme, D.J.; et al. Endophytic Bacterial Isolates From Halophytes Demonstrate Phytopathogen Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion Under High Salinity. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 681567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Marchut-Mikołajczyk, O.; Drożdżyński, P.; Polewczyk, A.; Smułek, W.; Antczak, T. Biosurfactant from Endophytic Bacillus pumilus 2A: Physicochemical Characterization, Production and Optimization and Potential for Plant Growth Promotion. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cappuccino, J.G.; Sherman, N. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual, 10th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Breed, R.S.; Murray, E.G.D.; Smith, N.R. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Sci. Ed.) 1958, 47, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Beveridge, T. Use of the Gram Stain in Microbiology. Biotech. Histochem. 2001, 76, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jorgensen, J.H.; Carroll, K.C.; Funke, G.; Pfaller, M.A.; Landry, M.L.; Richter, S.S.; Warnock, D.W. (Eds.) Manual of Clinical Microbiology; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Janda, J.M.; Abbott, S.L. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing for Bacterial Identification in the Diagnostic Laboratory: Pluses, Perils, and Pitfalls. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2761–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stackebrandt, E.; Goebel, B.M. Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stackebrandt, E.; Ebers, J. Taxonomic Parameters Revisited: Tarnished Gold Standards. Microbiol. Today 2006, 33, 152–155. [Google Scholar]
  56. Deljou, A.; Goudarzi, S. Green Extracellular Synthesis of the Silver Nanoparticles Using Thermophilic Bacillus Sp. AZ1 and Its Antimicrobial Activity Against Several Human Pathogenetic Bacteria. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 14, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ibrahim, E.; Luo, J.; Ahmed, T.; Wu, W.; Yan, C.; Li, B. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Onion Endophytic Bacterium and Its Antifungal Activity against Rice Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Elias, E.M.; Meganathan, G.; Pappuswamy, M. Green Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Applications of Silver Nanoparticles from Pachira glabra Leaf Extract. Microbe 2025, 7, 100413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tepe, B.; Daferera, D.; Sokmen, A.; Sokmen, M.; Polissiou, M. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oil and Various Extracts of Salvia tomentosa Miller (Lamiaceae). Food Chem. 2005, 90, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Loo, Y.Y.; Rukayadi, Y.; Nor-Khaizura, M.-A.-R.; Kuan, C.H.; Chieng, B.W.; Nishibuchi, M.; Radu, S. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Against Selected Gram-Negative Foodborne Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Isolation and phenotypic characteristics of endophytic bacterial colonies from Commiphora gileadensis. (+) = Positive.
Figure 1. Isolation and phenotypic characteristics of endophytic bacterial colonies from Commiphora gileadensis. (+) = Positive.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of endophytic bacterial isolate that identified as Bacillus subtilis CG1, constructed using 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of endophytic bacterial isolate that identified as Bacillus subtilis CG1, constructed using 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g002
Figure 3. The Successful AgNPs formation indicated by changing the mixture’s color from light yellow (A) to dark brown (B).
Figure 3. The Successful AgNPs formation indicated by changing the mixture’s color from light yellow (A) to dark brown (B).
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis absorption spectrum of B. subtilis-AgNPs.
Figure 4. UV-Vis absorption spectrum of B. subtilis-AgNPs.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g004
Figure 5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1.
Figure 5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g005
Figure 6. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs, (B) A histogram of the nanoparticle size distribution based on TEM measurements.
Figure 6. (A) Transmission electron micrograph of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs, (B) A histogram of the nanoparticle size distribution based on TEM measurements.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g006
Figure 7. (A) Scanning electron microscopy image. (B) The elemental composition graph extracted by energy-dispersive X-ray of B. subtilis-AgNPs.
Figure 7. (A) Scanning electron microscopy image. (B) The elemental composition graph extracted by energy-dispersive X-ray of B. subtilis-AgNPs.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g007
Figure 8. DLS analysis of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs, zeta potential distribution, and size distribution by intensity and mass.
Figure 8. DLS analysis of B. subtilis CG1-AgNPs, zeta potential distribution, and size distribution by intensity and mass.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g008
Figure 9. The antibacterial activity of B. subtilis-AgNPs against MRSA, S. epidermidis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. (A) Bar chart showing inhibition zone diameters (mm) ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) followed by Tukey’s test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. (B) Representative agar plates demonstrating the inhibition zones. (1) = 240 (µg/mL), (2) = 160 (µg/mL), (3) = 80 (µg/mL), (S) = supernatant, (-VE) = Negative control (0.95% NaCl) and (+VE) = Positive control (Ciprofloxacin).
Figure 9. The antibacterial activity of B. subtilis-AgNPs against MRSA, S. epidermidis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. (A) Bar chart showing inhibition zone diameters (mm) ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) followed by Tukey’s test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. (B) Representative agar plates demonstrating the inhibition zones. (1) = 240 (µg/mL), (2) = 160 (µg/mL), (3) = 80 (µg/mL), (S) = supernatant, (-VE) = Negative control (0.95% NaCl) and (+VE) = Positive control (Ciprofloxacin).
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g009aPharmaceuticals 19 01102 g009b
Figure 10. The anticandidal activity of B. subtilis-AgNPs against C. albicans, C. auris and C. tropicalis. (A) Bar chart showing inhibition zone diameters (mm) ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) followed by Tukey’s test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. (B) Representative agar plate demonstrating the inhibition zones. (1) = 240 (µg/mL), (2) = 160 (µg/mL), (3) = 80 (µg/mL), (S) = supernatant, (-VE) = Negative control (0.95% NaCl) and (+VE) = Positive control (Clotrimazole).
Figure 10. The anticandidal activity of B. subtilis-AgNPs against C. albicans, C. auris and C. tropicalis. (A) Bar chart showing inhibition zone diameters (mm) ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) followed by Tukey’s test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. (B) Representative agar plate demonstrating the inhibition zones. (1) = 240 (µg/mL), (2) = 160 (µg/mL), (3) = 80 (µg/mL), (S) = supernatant, (-VE) = Negative control (0.95% NaCl) and (+VE) = Positive control (Clotrimazole).
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g010aPharmaceuticals 19 01102 g010b
Figure 11. Growth curves of K. pneumoniae treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Figure 11. Growth curves of K. pneumoniae treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g011
Figure 12. Growth curves of E. coli treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Figure 12. Growth curves of E. coli treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g012
Figure 13. Growth curves of MRSA treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Figure 13. Growth curves of MRSA treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g013
Figure 14. Growth curves of S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Figure 14. Growth curves of S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g014
Figure 15. Growth curves of P. aeruginosa treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Figure 15. Growth curves of P. aeruginosa treated with B. subtilis CG1 AgNPs at concentrations of its MIC, 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g015
Figure 16. Biofilm inhibition (%) of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis-AgNPs at different concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 16. Biofilm inhibition (%) of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis-AgNPs at different concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g016
Figure 17. Biofilm eradication (%) of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis-AgNPs at different concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 17. Biofilm eradication (%) of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis treated with B. subtilis-AgNPs at different concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 g017
Table 1. The MIC µg/mL and MBC µg/mL ± SD of B. subtilis-AgNPs against MRSA, S. epidermidis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa.
Table 1. The MIC µg/mL and MBC µg/mL ± SD of B. subtilis-AgNPs against MRSA, S. epidermidis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa.
Bacterial StrainsMIC
(µg/mL)
MBC
(µg/mL)
Growth of Bacterial Colonies
MRSA25 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i001
S. epidermidis25 ± 0.0050 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i002
E. coli6.25 ± 0.006.25 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i003
K. pneumoniae12.5 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i004
P. aeruginosa12.5 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i005
Table 2. The MIC µg/mL and MFC µg/mL ± SD of B. subtilis-AgNPs against C. albicans, C. auris and C. tropicalis.
Table 2. The MIC µg/mL and MFC µg/mL ± SD of B. subtilis-AgNPs against C. albicans, C. auris and C. tropicalis.
Candidal
Species
MIC
(µg/mL)
MFC
(µg/mL)
Growth of Candidal Colonies
C. albicans25 ± 0.00100 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i006
C. auris25 ± 0.0050 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i007
C. tropicalis25 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00Pharmaceuticals 19 01102 i008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aljohani, G.S.; Salmen, S.H. Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 and Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Drug-Resistant Pathogens. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071102

AMA Style

Aljohani GS, Salmen SH. Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 and Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Drug-Resistant Pathogens. Pharmaceuticals. 2026; 19(7):1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071102

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aljohani, Ghaida Saud, and Saleh H. Salmen. 2026. "Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 and Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Drug-Resistant Pathogens" Pharmaceuticals 19, no. 7: 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071102

APA Style

Aljohani, G. S., & Salmen, S. H. (2026). Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Endophytic Bacillus subtilis CG1 and Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Drug-Resistant Pathogens. Pharmaceuticals, 19(7), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071102

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop