Next Article in Journal
Potential of Triazines as Antidiabetic Agents—A Review of Structures and Pharmacological Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Encapsulated Locust Bean Gum for Wound Healing: In Vitro/In Vivo and Molecular Docking Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Roles of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment: A Review

by
Suresh Kumar Srinivasamurthy
1,
Vijaya Paul Samuel
2,
Tarig Hakim Merghani Hakim
3,
Biji Thomas George
4,
Grisilda Vidya Bernardt
5,
Ashwin Kamath
6 and
Chakradhara Rao Satyanarayana Uppugunduri
7,*
1
Department of Pharmacology, RAK College of Medicine, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Anatomy, RAK College of Medicine, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Physiology, RAK College of Medicine, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
4
Department of Surgery, RAK College of Medicine, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
5
Department of Biochemistry, RAK College of Medicine, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
6
Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
7
Department of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(7), 1016; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071016
Submission received: 12 April 2026 / Revised: 10 June 2026 / Accepted: 23 June 2026 / Published: 30 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)

Abstract

Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 2B (UGT2B) enzymes constitute a critical subgroup of phase II metabolizing enzymes that modulate the clearance of steroid hormones, carcinogens, and numerous anticancer agents, thereby influencing cancer susceptibility, progression, and therapeutic outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the genetic, regulatory, and functional roles of UGT2B family members, particularly UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, UGT2B17, and UGT2B28, in oncogenesis and cancer treatment. We summarize evidence from molecular, epidemiological, pharmacogenetic, and clinical studies demonstrating how UGT2B expression patterns, polymorphisms, copy number variations, epigenetic regulation, and microRNA-mediated control shape intratumoral hormone homeostasis, carcinogen detoxification, and drug resistance across multiple malignancies, including prostate, breast, lung, colorectal, hematological, and hormone-dependent cancers. UGT2B enzymes metabolize several widely used anticancer drugs and active metabolites, thereby affecting pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity. Understanding the context-specific roles of UGT2B family members offers a compelling opportunity for therapeutic exploitation. In particular, rational combination strategies incorporating UGT2B inhibitors or modulators alongside standard anticancer agents may enhance drug effectiveness without increasing dosage, while simultaneously enabling the dose reduction of the partner agent to mitigate dose-dependent toxicities. Such approaches are especially relevant for therapies with narrow therapeutic indices. Overall, this review highlights UGT2B enzymes as multifunctional determinants of cancer risk and treatment response and underscores their promise as biomarkers and actionable targets for precision oncology and optimized combination regimens.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are an important family of phase II metabolic enzymes that conjugate glucuronic acid to lipophilic substrates, thereby facilitating their enhanced solubility and elimination [1]. These enzymes play a vital role in the biotransformation of endogenous substances and xenobiotics, underscoring their broad physiological significance [1,2]. Within the UGT superfamily, the UGT2B subfamily is particularly relevant in oncology due to its involvement in the metabolism of steroid hormones, bile acids, and xenobiotics [2,3]. Six isoforms have been identified in this subfamily: UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B11, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17 [2,3]. Except for UGT2B10 and UGT2B11, all isoforms have demonstrated activity toward steroid molecules [4].
UGT2B7 most efficiently glucuronidates estrogens, catechol estrogens, and androstane3α,17βdiol [4]. UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 display similar activity toward androstane3α,17βdiol (approximately 30% lower than UGT2B7), while UGT2B17 shows the highest activity toward androsterone, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone. UGT2B4 also acts on 5α-reduced androgens and catechol estrogens, though with lower efficiency [4].
A comprehensive analysis of UGT expression across 23 human tissue types revealed several UGT isoforms in steroidogenic tissues such as the breast, prostate, heart, and adrenal glands [5]. However, UGT enzymes are predominantly expressed in the alimentary tract and liver [5]. Notably, UGT2B4 and UGT2B15 exhibit exceptionally high hepatic expression, with levels approximately nine-fold and four-fold higher, respectively, than UGT2B7 [5].
In the prostate, UGT2B enzymes localize mainly to epithelial cells, strongly in basal and moderately in luminal cells, with UGT2B17 found exclusively in basal cells [6]. UGT2B17 converts DHEA to androsterone and 3αdiol, while UGT2B15, localized in luminal cells, acts where DHT is formed from testosterone [7]. This spatial expression pattern underscores their role in inactivating potent androgens and protecting prostate tissue from excessive steroid activity [6,7].
The selective expression of UGT2B enzymes suggests organ-specific roles, with presence not only in the liver but also in extrahepatic tissues such as the prostate, breast, and ovary, where they regulate local steroid levels [8,9]. UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 are key enzymes that conjugate 5α-reduced C19 steroids, including dihydrotestosterone (DHT), in prostate cells. Their expression is differentially regulated by hormones and growth factors, with UGT2B17 being more labile than UGT2B15 [8]. Overexpression of UGT2B17 in prostate cells reduces androgen responsiveness by enhancing steroid clearance [8]. Protein stability studies revealed that UGT2B17 is the most labile enzyme [4]. UGT2B17 is also the first human UGT enzyme demonstrated to be found in extrahepatic tissues, such as the prostate and uterus [8].
Genetic variation in UGT enzymes affects the in vivo glucuronidation of tobacco-related compounds, a key process in detoxifying nicotine and carcinogenic nitrosamines [10]. The strongest associations were found with UGT2B10 variants, particularly for cotinine glucuronidation in two ethnic groups studied (e.g., rs2331559, rs11726322 in Europeans; rs835309 in African Americans) [10]. Other nominal associations involved UGT2B17*2, UGT2B7, and UGT1A variants with the glucuronidation of nicotine, trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (3HC), and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL). Thus, UGT2B10 plays a pivotal role in cotinine metabolism, and genetic differences in UGT enzymes contribute to ethnic variability in glucuronidation capacity, potentially explaining smoking-related cancer risk disparities [10].
Beyond their metabolic roles, evidence increasingly supports the involvement of UGT2B enzymes in cancer-related processes [3]. Differential UGT expression has been associated with the initiation and progression of oncogenic signaling pathways, contributing to tumor development [3,9,11]. The large-scale cancer genome atlas (TCGA) analysis of 10,069 tumors across 33 cancer types identified 3427 somatic mutations in UGT genes, with about 18% of tumors harboring such mutations [12]. Approximately 65% of these mutations were coding (missense, nonsense, or frameshift), while 10% occurred in noncoding regions, potentially impacting gene regulation [12]. Mutation frequency varied widely across cancers, exceeding 25% in colon, lung, skin, and uterine cancers, but under 5% in others. The frequently affected gene is UGT2B4.
Recent molecular profiling and bioinformatic analyses have identified UGT2B15 as an oncogene, with overexpression linked to poor patient outcomes in gastric cancer, potentially mediated through the HippoYAP signaling pathway [13]. The UGT2B genes exhibit numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms and cis-regulatory variants [14]. Notably, UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 exhibit common whole-gene deletion polymorphisms [15].
In the context of cancer chemotherapy, UGTs are involved in the metabolism of anticancer agents or their metabolites, such as topoisomerase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and hormonal modulators [16,17,18]. The cellular UGT activity also influences resistance to anticancer agents [19,20]. Dellinger et al. showed that UGT expression diminishes during melanoma progression [19]. However, metastatic melanoma cell lines treated with vemurafenib showed the re-expression of UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15, accompanied by a corresponding increase in glucuronidation activity—indicating an adaptive metabolic response to therapy [19]. Silencing UGT2B7 increased sensitivity to adriamycin and epirubicin, suggesting a role in drug resistance [19]. Additionally, cancer cells such as CLL may express high UGT2B17, locally inactivating fludarabine and affecting intratumoral drug levels [20]. The current review presents a narrative synthesis of the role of UGT2B in cancer, focusing on genetic or functional variation, cancer type, and therapeutic implications.
A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant English language studies published from database inception to early 2026. Search terms combined keywords such as “Phase II glucuronosyl conjugation enzymes,” “UGT2B family enzymes,” “UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 2B family,” “cancer predisposition,” and “oncology treatment,” connected with Boolean operators (AND, OR). Studies were included if they addressed the role of UGT2Bs in cancer susceptibility, association, progression, or therapeutic response, encompassing both in vitro and clinical evidence. Exclusion criteria included non-English publications, conference abstracts without full text, and studies lacking mechanistic or pharmacological relevance. Studies were selected based on title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review. Data were extracted and summarized narratively to identify key findings, mechanisms, and gaps in the literature. Given the narrative design, the focus was on the conceptual synthesis of key evidence and mechanisms.

2. UGT2B Structural Characteristics

The UGT2B gene cluster on chromosome 4q13 was mapped, containing UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, pseudogenes, and remnant gene fragments, with UGT2B4 located between UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 [21]. Also, the UGT2B gene family is hypothesized to have evolved through recent gene duplication, mutation, and rearrangement events, showing greater genetic complexity and diversity [21]. Protein sequence similarity among the UGT2B family members is moderate to high, with few members sharing more than 90% similarity. Despite sharing 95% sequence identity, the UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 genes showed differences in basal promoter activity, indicating distinct regulatory mechanisms [22].

2.1. UGT2B Substrates with Oncological Relevance

UGT2B members plays a critical role in phase II detoxification of carcinogens like NNAL and steroid compounds (Table 1). The Bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor, is primarily glucuronidated through UGT2B15 in human liver microsomes [23]. Comparative kinetic and inhibition studies showed substrate-selective glucuronidation by different UGT2B enzymes. UGT2B7 selectively glucuronidated 6α-hydroxyprogesterone and 21-hydroxyprogesterone, with 6α-OHP following Michaelis–Menten kinetics and 21-OHP showing positive cooperativity [24]. UGT2B7 also mediated the high-affinity glucuronidation of 11α-hydroxyprogesterone. In contrast, UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 were the primary enzymes responsible for testosterone 17β-glucuronidation and the high-affinity glucuronidation of 16α-hydroxyprogesterone. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations identified acetaminophen, lorazepam, mycophenolic acid, and a voriconazole N-oxide intermediate as potential ligands of UGT2B10, which may have significance for drug interactions [25].
A pharmacophore model identified key structural features required for intestinal UGT2B17 substrates, including an accessible hydroxyl or carboxyl group, a nearby hydrophobic group, and an aromatic ring [26]. However, several more tested compounds, including amines, inhibited UGT2B17 regardless of whether they were substrates, suggesting multiple inhibitory mechanisms. Thus, UGT2B17 has broad substrate and inhibitor promiscuity, contributing to variability in oral drug metabolism and disposition [26]. Precht et al. identified the carbinol metabolite of the phase 1 reaction of letrozole metabolism as a novel in vitro probe substrate for UGT2B7 [27].
Table 1. UGT2B members and their substrates, modulators in the context of oncology.
Table 1. UGT2B members and their substrates, modulators in the context of oncology.
UGT Isoform(s)SubstratesInducersInhibitorsOncology RelevanceReferences
UGT2B4Hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA), catechol estrogens, codeine, morphine, canagliflozin, carvedilol, clopidogrel carboxylate, propranolol Fenofibric acid, Chenodeoxycholic acidClotrimazole, methadoneImportant in bile acid and endogenous steroid detoxification[28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]
UGT2B7Androsterone, catechol estrogens, estriol, steroids, fatty acids, 4 OH tamoxifen, endoxifen, epirubicin, letrozole, hydroxycotinine, HDCA, 6α-hydroxyprogesterone, 21-hydroxyprogesterone, 11α-hydroxyprogesterone, zidovudine, morphine, hydromorphone, codeine, buprenorphine, ketoprofen, all-trans retinoic acid, efavirenz, R-oxazepam, carvedilol, clopidogrel carboxylate, propranolol, lamotrigine, chloramphenicol, asciminib Dexamethasone, rifampinTetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), mefenamic acid, licoagrochalcone A, glycycoumarin, crizotinib, ceritinib, asciminib, everolimus, bromophenols, fluconazole, flavone O-glycosides, methadone Metabolism of endogenous steroids and bile acids
Pharmacokinetics of letrozole and tamoxifen
 
Drug interactions of oncology context—crizotinib, ceritinib, asciminib, everolimus, cannabidiol and morphine
[24,27,28,29,30,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]
UGT2B10Cotinine, nicotine, NNAL, amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, trimipramine, medetomidine, clozapine, olanzapine, dexmedetomidineAflatoxin B1lorazepam, mycophenolic acid, fluconazole, amitriptyline, doxepin, mianserin, desloratadine, loratadineN-glucuronidation; polymorphisms affect nicotine dependence and smoking behavior[60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]
UGT2B15Sorafenib, dasatinib, imatinib, 4 OH tamoxifen, DHT, androsterone, 5αandrostane 3α, 17βdiol, androsterone, 16α-hydroxyprogesterone, S-oxazepam, lorazepam, rofecoxib, acetaminophen, hydroxyphenytoin (R isomer), morphine, dabigatran, bisphenol ANaftopidil, Aflatoxin B1CBD, 11-OH-THC, and THC, entrectinib, tucatinib, fedratinib, pexidartinib, calcitriolProstate androgen clearance; variants linked to prostate cancer[23,24,36,38,46,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]
UGT2B17Testosterone, DHT, androsterone, 5αandrostane 3α,17βdiol, 16α-hydroxyprogesterone, 3hydroxycotinine, exemestane, fludarabine, vorinostat, morphine, clopidogrel carboxylate, diclofenac, asciminibExemestane, 17-hydroyexemestane, Aflatoxin B1Imatinib, tucatinib, asciminib, curcumin, salicylic acid, calcitriolGlucuronidation of 17dihydroexemestane
High UGT2B17 in leukemic cells inactivates fludarabine, contributing to drug resistance
UGT2B17*2 genotype is associated with reduced glucuronidation of vorinostat
[24,29,51,67,75,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]
UGT2B4 is highly liable for differential expression through alternative promoters, exon skipping, and alternative splicing [11]. Sorafenib, dasatinib, and imatinib showed mixed inhibition of paracetamol glucuronidation, while demonstrating strong inhibitory effects on UGT1A9 and UGT2B15 [69].
Sun et al. demonstrated that multiple UGTs, particularly UGT2B7 in addition to UGT1A10 and UGT1A8, are significantly involved in 4 OH tamoxifen and endoxifen metabolism [36]. Furthermore, fluconazole, a recognized UGT2B7 inhibitor, markedly reduced efavirenz (EFV) glucuronide formation by up to 80%, indicating that EFV may serve as a specific UGT2B7 substrate in vitro [37]. Flunitrazepam (FNZ) inhibited UGT2B7-mediated catechol estrogen glucuronidation and also inhibited buprenorphine glucuronidation by UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 but not UGT1A3 [39].
Similarly, cotinine was identified as a highly selective substrate for UGT2B10-mediated N-glucuronidation [66]. Among phenotyping inhibitors, only fluconazole significantly inhibited UGT2B10 activity. Most antidepressants and antipsychotics tested inhibited UGT2B10, with the strongest inhibition observed for amitriptyline, doxepin, mianserin, desloratadine, and loratadine [66]. In vitro in vivo prediction showed clinically significant interactions with medications exclusively metabolized by UGT2B10.
Innocenti et al. (2001) studied the specific UGT isoform responsible for epirubicin glucuronidation in humans [43]. The methodology utilized the screening of seven UGT isoforms (UGT1A1, 2B7, 2B15, etc.) in cellular systems and the analysis of microsomes from 47 human livers and HK293 cells expressing UGT2B7 variants. It was concluded that UGT2B7 is the major human UGT catalyzing epirubicin glucuronidation, evidenced by its unique activity among screened isoforms, having an oncological relevance [43].

2.2. The UGT2B Inhibitors and Inducers

The UGT2B family of glucuronosyltransferases is widely modulated by xenobiotics that are not themselves substrates. For example, zafirlukast exhibits substrate-specific inhibition of UGTs, particularly UGT1As, and a moderate inhibitor of UGT2Bs [88]. Exposure to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α activators (fenofibric acid) has been shown to significantly elevate UGT2B4 mRNA expression in hepatocytes or hepatoblastoma HepG2 and Huh7 cells, thereby potentially increasing the catabolism of bile acids [31].
PPARα agonists such as fenofibric acid promote cytotoxic bile acid catabolism apart from their role in lipid and cholesterol metabolism in human hepatocytes, through the induction of UGT2B4 [31]. Chenodeoxycholic acid, apart from being a substrate, also independently induces UGT2B4 through its agonism on farnesoid X receptor (FXR) [89]. By developing a selective activity assay using canagliflozin, Lapham et al. identified clotrimazole as a potent and highly selective inhibitor of UGT2B4 [32]. The metabolic activity of UGT2B7 was enhanced in HuH-7 cells by dexamethasone, possibly via glucocorticoid receptor activation [48]. Exemestane upregulated UGT2B17 expression in breast cancer cells through steroid-responsive promoter elements. Licoagrochalcone A and Glycycoumarin were also identified as potent UGT2B7 inhibitors using UPro2B7-enabled real-time imaging of endogenous UGT2B7 activity [49]. Among Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, used for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), crizotinib and ceritinib have shown inhibitory activity to UGT2B7 [50]. Asciminib, used for adult patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia harboring the T315I mutation, is also a substrate of UGT2B7 and UGT2B17 [51]. In vitro enzyme-based assays using human liver microsomes demonstrated that asciminib inhibited UGT2B7 [51]. Everolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is also shown to exhibit moderate inhibitory activity to UGT2B7 [52]. Another example is that of cannabinoids inhibiting UGT2B7-mediated metabolism of opioids, indicating a clinically relevant risk of moderate drug–drug interactions when opioids are used alongside cannabis- or cannabinoid-based therapies [45]. Salicylic acid inhibited UGT2B17 activity through an uncompetitive inhibition mechanism, which has negligible potential to cause clinically significant drug interactions [86].
Environmental pollutants, such as Bromophenols (BPs), were also demonstrated to potently inhibit several UGT enzymes, including UGT2B7, using glucuronidation assays [53]. Using recombinant UGT-mediated 4-methylumbelliferone glucuronidation assays, Yang et al. demonstrated that both Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and hydroxylated metabolites (OH-PAHs) inhibited several UGT isoforms, including UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 [90]. Similarly, HPLC-based 4-methylumbelliferone disposition assays demonstrated that dietary flavone O-glycosides such as rutin and nicotifiorin significantly inhibited recombinant UGT2B7 activity [55]. Similarly, the enantiomers of naftopidil (NAF), an α1D/α1A adrenoceptor antagonist, upregulate UGT2B15 in human BPH1 cells [91]. This is accompanied by reduced intraprostatic and intracellular DHT levels and consequent increase in apoptosis. These findings suggest that NAF enantiomers act as novel UGT2B15 inducers, distinct from AR antagonists and 5α-reductase inhibitors, by enhancing DHT elimination and promoting apoptosis in prostate cells [91].
Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exhibited inhibitory potential towards several UGT2B family members. Entrectinib used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown inhibition of UGT2B15 in recombinant in vitro assays [74]. Fedratinib, approved for myelofibrosis, potently inhibited UGT2B15 in enzyme kinetics systems and human liver microsomes (HLMs) [76]. Pexidartinib approved for adult tenosynovial giant cell tumor was shown to act as a broad inhibitor of multiple human UGT enzymes in recombinant in vitro assays [77]. It showed mixed inhibition of UGT2B15, while in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) analysis predicted a significant risk of drug–drug interactions with UGT-metabolized drugs at clinical doses [77]. Imatinib was also demonstrated to inhibit UGT2B17 in human enzyme assays [84]. Tucatinib, approved for adult advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, showed in vitro inhibition of multiple human UGT enzymes, including UGT2B15 and UGT2B17, suggesting potential clinically relevant drug–drug interaction risk and the possibility of exploitation of this drug interaction for therapeutic efficacy [75].
Natural products may also inhibit UGT2B isoforms. Bacchav et al. demonstrated that curcumin inhibited UGT2B17-mediated testosterone glucuronidation in human intestinal cells, significantly reducing testosterone glucuronide and androstenedione formation [85]. The in vitro findings were supported by a pilot crossover study in hypogonadal men, which showed that the coadministration of curcumin with oral testosterone undecanoate increased testosterone bioavailability [85]. Treatment with Aflatoxin B1 significantly upregulated the mRNA expression of UGT1A3, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17 in HepG2 cells [67].
Endogenous molecules were also shown to modulate the activity of UGT2B isoforms in addition to being a substrate of these enzymes. β-Estradiol (β-E2) and α-estradiol (α-E2) differ in the stereochemical configuration of the C17-OH group, which markedly influences their interactions with UGT enzymes. β-E2 moderately inhibited UGT1A9, UGT2B4, and UGT2B7, while enhancing UGT2B17 activity by improving substrate binding and catalytic turnover. In contrast, α-E2 showed much stronger inhibition of UGT2B4 and UGT2B7, but had minimal effects on UGT1A9 and UGT2B17 [92]. Calcitriol, a vitamin D receptor activator, negatively regulates UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 in prostate cancer LNCaP cells, reducing androgen inactivation.

3. Genetic Factors Influencing the UGT2B Genes, Expression and Function

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are regulated at multiple biological levels. At the genetic level, polymorphisms such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variations (CNVs) can affect gene structure and expression [93]. Transcriptionally, promoter activity and transcription factor binding influence the initiation and rate of UGT gene transcription. At the post-transcriptional level, UGT regulation includes alternative splicing, which generates diverse isoforms with potentially distinct functions, and microRNAs (e.g., miR376), which bind to UGT mRNAs to modulate their stability and translation. Translational regulation involves ribosomal control and RNA binding proteins that influence how efficiently UGT mRNAs are translated into proteins. Finally, posttranslational modifications affect UGT protein stability, subcellular localization, and interactions, thereby fine-tuning enzyme activity and function. The list of common genetic variants reported in UGT2B family members and their minor allele frequencies across different populations is outlined in Supplementary Material Table S1. These population differences indicate their relevance in defining the therapeutic outcomes of substrates of the UGT2B family. These differences are also essential to understand the exploitation of drug–drug interactions and their relevance in specific populations.
Neumann et al. showed that the expression of UGTs, including UGT2B7 and UGT2B17, increased throughout childhood and adolescence, potentially influenced by hormonal signaling [94]. This developmental regulation may contribute to interindividual variability in drug response among pediatric patients [94]. The elevated UGT activity including that of UGT2B7 seemed to explain a significant portion of the metabolic changes observed during pregnancy which has impact for analgesics use such as buprenorphine [95]. Studies have investigated genetic factors influencing testosterone/epitestosterone (T/E) ratios, a key marker in doping tests. While a T/E ratio > 4 suggests testosterone abuse, some individuals naturally exceed this threshold, risking false positive results [96]. T/E ratio analyses in urine samples and the genotyping of men for polymorphisms in CYP17, UGT2B17, UGT2B15, and UGT2B7 showed that individuals lacking UGT2B17 had higher UGT2B15 mRNA expression, suggesting a compensatory mechanism [96]. These findings highlight that genetic variation in UGT2B17, at least partly, can affect T/E ratios.
Lampe et al. examined the frequency of UGT2B4(D458E), UGT2B7(H268Y), and UGT2B15(D85Y) polymorphisms in 233 individuals of Asian and Caucasian descent [97]. Significant ethnic differences were found in allele and genotype frequencies for all three polymorphisms (p < 0.02). Asians showed a much higher frequency of UGT2B4 (D458) (100%) and a greater occurrence of UGT2B7(H268) and UGT2B15(D85) homozygosity compared to Caucasians [97]. Conversely, Caucasians had a higher prevalence of Y268 and Y85 homozygotes. These findings suggest notable interethnic variability in UGT2B gene polymorphisms, which probably contributes to differences in hormone metabolism and cancer susceptibility, particularly in sex hormone-related cancers, highlighting the need for further multiethnic research (see Supplementary Table S1). Nuclear receptors, such as pregnane X receptor (PXR), constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), and PPAR, play a role in the regulation of UGTs, which is specific to tissues [98]. Alternative splice variants, often catalytically inactive, can regulate enzyme activity and are implicated in tumor progression in cancer cells [99] (Figure 1).

4. UGT 2B Family and Their Role in Various Cancers

4.1. UGT 2B and Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most studied in association studies evaluating UGT2B polymorphisms risks (Table 2). Androgens play a pivotal role in prostate physiology and cancer progression. Active androgens like dihydrotestosterone (DHT) are metabolized and cleared through glucuronidation by UGT2B15 and UGT2B17. Several studies have shown positive association between UGT2B and prostate cancer [68,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. Park et al. in a case–control (420 prostate cancer patients and 487 controls) genetic study involving African American and Caucasian showed that UGT2B17 null genotype (gene deletion) was linked to an augmented risk of prostate cancer, especially in Caucasians, but not significantly in African Americans [104]. Studies have also explored the additive effects of UGT with other polymorphisms. Age-matched case–control study from the United States (356 prostate cancer patients and 363 controls) demonstrated that the UGT2B17 null polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk (OR = 1.7), and the risk was even higher in individuals with the HSD3B1 Asn/Asn genotype (OR = 2.7) [106]. Similarly, a study investigated the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) in relation with UGT gene polymorphisms, particularly UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 deletions [107]. Among 526 Caucasian and 320 Asian men with localized prostate cancer, those with at least two deleted UGT2B gene copies had a significantly higher risk of BCR (HR, 2.26 and 2.16, respectively) [107]. In Asians, UGT2B17 deletion was also linked to higher Gleason scores, while no associations were found with PSA or TNM staging. Patients with these deletions also showed reduced circulating androgen glucuronides, indicating altered androgen metabolism. This study suggested a potential prognostic value of inherited UGT deletions in prostate cancer progression, indicating that such genetic variants may influence recurrence risk through their impact on hormonal inactivation pathways [107].
However, not all studies have shown an unequivocal positive result [110,111,112,113,114,115]. A large population-based case–control study found no association between the UGT2B17 gene deletion polymorphism and prostate cancer risk or prostate cancer-specific mortality, contradicting earlier reports [111]. Similarly, a study evaluated UGT2B17 gene deletion polymorphism in a Caucasian population [113]. Using a high-throughput real-time PCR genotyping method, researchers analyzed 411 prostate cancer cases and 397 controls. The frequency of the UGT2B17 homozygous deletion (0/0) was 12% among controls, aligning with expected population frequencies. However, there was lack of significant association between the deletion polymorphism and prostate cancer risk [113]. Hu et al. identified a functional promoter polymorphism (155G/A) in the UGT2B17 gene, which influences its expression in prostate cells. FOXA1 knockdown reduced UGT2B17 expression, and individuals with the 155A allele had higher levels of glucuronidated androgen metabolites in circulation. Despite its functional effect on gene regulation, the 155G/A polymorphism was not associated with prostate cancer risk [114]. Also, another study found no significant association between the analyzed polymorphisms and prostate cancer (PC) risk in Iranian patients; however, it showed increased risk for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [115].
A meta-analysis of six studies by Kpoghomou et al., including 7029 participants (3839 prostate cancer cases and 3190 controls), evaluated the relationship between UGT2B17 gene status and PC risk [116]. The pooled analysis revealed a significant association, with individuals carrying the UGT2B17 deletion showing an increased risk of PC (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.14–2.64, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity and control type yielded consistent results, confirming that UGT2B17 genetic variation contributes to prostate cancer susceptibility [116]. A comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the association of UGT2B17 deletion and CYP17 T34C polymorphisms with PC risk analyzed data from over 25 studies, involving approximately 17,000 subjects [117]. The analysis found a lack of significant association between the CYP17 c34T>C polymorphism and prostate cancer across various genetic models. However, the UGT2B17 deletion polymorphism (Del/Del genotype) showed a marginal association with increased prostate cancer risk in the overall analysis, and a statistically significant association. These findings reinforce the functional importance of UGT2B17 in androgen metabolism and suggest a potential genetic susceptibility marker for PC [117].

4.2. UGT 2B and Breast Cancer

Genetic variation upstream of the UGT2B4 gene, a key enzyme in the metabolism of steroid hormones and bile acids, has been a focus in relation to breast cancer risk (Figure 2) [118]. A study investigated the association between tag SNP rs13129471 and breast cancer risk in 1261 patients and 825 controls of African ancestry [118]. The homozygous variant genotype was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk, while heterozygotes showed no significant effect [118]. Similarly, a retrospective study assessed the link between UGT2B7 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Han Chinese women [119]. Among 672 breast cancer patients and 670 healthy controls, the rs7441774 G allele was significantly more frequent in cases (41.2% vs. 35.8%; p = 0.006), and individuals with the GG genotype had a notably higher risk compared to those with AA genotype (adjusted OR = 1.63, p = 0.008). Functional assays showed that the rs7441774 G allele reduces UGT2B7 transcriptional activity, suggesting a potential mechanism [119]. These findings support a role for UGT2B7 variants, particularly rs7441774, in breast cancer susceptibility in the Chinese population. Contrary to these reports, no association of UGT2B7 polymorphisms with breast cancer was reported in Jordanian Arab women [120].
UGT2B genetic variants increases the risk for breast cancer by altering circulating sex hormone levels [121]. Among 163 women in western Washington, the UGT1A1 variant allele was significantly associated with a reduced risk of estrogen receptor-negative tumors, while UGT2B15 and SULT1A1 variants showed non-significant protective trends [121]. In a subset of postmenopausal patients not on hormone therapy, estradiol levels were significantly higher in those with UGT2B15 Asp/Tyr or Tyr/Tyr genotypes [121]. Functional polymorphisms in UGT2B were not associated with sex hormone clearance, and with breast density, in premenopausal women aged 40–45 [122].
In addition to genetic variants gene expression, changes may alter the risk for breast cancer. Haakensen et al. investigated the biological basis of mammographic density (MD) for breast cancer through the gene expression profiling of breast tissue from 143 women (79 healthy and 64 with breast cancer) [123]. Analysis revealed that 24 genes, including three UGT genes and ESR1 (estrogen receptor), were downregulated in high MD tissues [123]. Notably, UGT2B10 expression independently predicted MD, regardless of age, hormone therapy, or parity. These findings suggest that lower UGT expression is associated with higher MD and may contribute to increased breast cancer risk, particularly in younger women and hormone therapy users [123]. Another case–control study (236 breast cancer patients and 203 controls) in an Iranian population demonstrated significant association of UGT2B17 null genotype with breast cancer [124].

4.3. UGT2B and Lung Cancer

UGT2B17, known to metabolize tobacco-related carcinogens like NNAL, exhibits common copy number variation CNVs [125]. However, the null genotype was not significantly more frequent among lung cancer patients, including women with adenocarcinoma, and showed no association with overall survival or cancer risk by sex or tumor type. Thus, there is a need for the population-specific validation of genetic risk markers [125].
Qian et al. showed that the rs12233179 SNP of UGT2B7 was associated with an increased risk of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in never-smoking Chinese women [126]. Furthermore, UGT2B7 was found to be upregulated in the tumor tissues of female NSCLC patients and was linked to a poor prognosis [126]. Given that the SNP is involved in the altered regulation of sex hormone binding globulin, a potential involvement of sex steroid hormones in lung cancer has been proposed.

4.4. UGT2B and Esophageal Cancers

Hu et al. investigated the contribution of CNVs to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk using a candidate gene strategy [15]. Among six CNVs examined in 404 ESCC patients and 402 controls, a significant association was observed between increased ESCC risk and UGT2B28 copy number loss. This germline copy number loss was also associated with somatic gene deletions and reduced UGT2B28 mRNA levels in tissues, indicating impaired detoxification capacity. These findings substantiate the role of UGT2B in the detoxification of carcinogens such as NNAL [127]. Furthermore, it should be noted that steroid compounds, including bile acids and sex steroids, are known risk factors for ESCC [128,129].
Similarly, a study by Lian et al., exploring the common pathways between ESCC and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), found that UGT2B17 and miR224, originally linked to ESCC, was also significantly associated with EAC. Functional analysis suggested shared biological pathways between the two cancer types. Notably, increased UGT2B17 expression and reduced miR224 signaling may influence EAC development and its responsiveness to male sex hormones [130].
The case–control study by Dura et al., among 351 EC patients and 592 controls, showed that UGT1A1 high-activity genotypes were linked to risk of ESCC (OR = 1.62), possibly due to lower bilirubin (an antioxidant) [131]. In contrast, UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 genotypes linked to reduced predicted enzyme activity were significantly associated with a higher risk of ESCC, likely due to the impaired detoxification of toxic carcinogens [131]. No associations were found for EAC. These findings also highlight the role of the UGT2B-related detoxification capacity of carcinogens in ESCC susceptibility.
Dura et al. studied 351 esophageal cancer patients and 592 controls to determine the functional polymorphisms in UGT genes, which influence detoxification enzyme activity, affecting EC risk [131]. Based on predicted in vivo enzyme activity, UGT genotypes were classified as high, medium, or low activity. Significant associations were found for ESCC but not EAC. Specifically, high-activity UGT1A1 genotypes were linked to increased ESCC risk (OR = 1.62), whereas high-and-medium-activity UGT2B4 and high-activity UGT1A8 genotypes were associated with reduced ESCC risk [131]. The findings suggest that UGT polymorphisms may modulate susceptibility to ESCC, likely through effects on carcinogen detoxification and antioxidant metabolism, but do not influence EAC risk.

4.5. UGT2B and Bladder Cancer

Lin et al. investigated whether the UGT2B7 c.802C>T (His268Tyr) polymorphism is associated with bladder cancer risk in benzidine-exposed Chinese workers from the dye industry [132]. Among 36 bladder cancer cases and control groups (251 exposed and 218 unexposed individuals), the TT genotype was significantly more frequent in cancer patients (25%) than in unexposed controls (9%; OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.37–7.98, p = 0.006). The T allele was also more common in cases (46%) than in controls (33%; OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.05–2.87, p = 0.03). Population comparison showed that the TT genotype was less frequent in Chinese than in Caucasians but similar to Japanese frequencies. Overall, the findings suggest that the UGT2B7 TT genotype may increase bladder cancer susceptibility in individuals exposed to benzidine, likely due to altered detoxification capacity [132]. But this observation was not consistent across other populations [133]. Using a PCRRFLP assay, researchers analyzed 211 bladder cancer cases, 210 urological controls, and 171 occupationally exposed patients from Germany. The TT genotype frequencies were similar across all groups (27% in cancer cases, 35% in controls, 25% in exposed patients), indicating no significant association between UGT2B7 genotype and bladder cancer risk in this Caucasian population. However, the study confirmed ethnic differences in UGT2B7 genotype frequencies between Caucasians and Chinese, suggesting that genetic background may influence susceptibility in different populations [133].

4.6. UGT2B and Colorectal Cancers

The studies investigating the effect of UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 gene deletions on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk are sparse. In one such study in a Caucasian population, involving 665 CRC cases and 621 controls, the UGT2B17 deletion genotype (0/0) showed a significant association with a reduced risk of CRC, particularly in men, but not in women [134]. The protective effect was especially evident for rectal cancer, with no association found for colon cancer or for UGT2B28 CNV [134]. These findings suggest that UGT2B17 deletion may lower CRC risk, possibly by increasing exposure to protective compounds like flavonoids and NSAIDs, which are normally metabolized by UGT2B17. In the same direction, a meta-analysis confirmed a significant association between the UGT2B7 rs7439366 variant and colorectal cancer risk, suggesting that it could serve as a promising biomarker [135]. Similarly, in a study of 79 CRC cases, copy number aberration data, gene expression profiles, and clinical information highlighted several potential CRC-related genes, including UGT2B28 [136].
Van der Logt et al. investigated whether the UGT2B7 H268Y polymorphism influences CRC risk in 411 Caucasian CRC patients and 600 controls [137]. While overall genotype frequencies did not differ between groups, the UGT2B7 genotype was significantly more frequent in patients with proximal colon cancer (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.11–2.89), with an even stronger association in males. No link was found with tumor stage. The findings suggest that the UGT2B7 variant may increase susceptibility to proximal CRC, particularly among men [137].

4.7. UGT2B and Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Kilfoy et al. investigated whether genetic polymorphisms in metabolism and detoxification genes influence the risk of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and whether these associations are modified by alcohol or tobacco use. A total of 1647 SNPs in 132 candidate genes was analyzed among 344 PTC cases and 452 controls [138]. While nine SNPs and seven gene regions initially showed associations with PTC risk, none remained significant after correction for multiple testing. However, significant gene–environment interactions were observed: UGT2B7 and NAT1 polymorphisms interacted with alcohol intake, and CYP26B1 polymorphisms interacted with tobacco use. These findings suggest that detoxification gene variants may modify the effects of alcohol and tobacco on PTC risk, though larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary observations [138].

4.8. UGT2B and Endometrial Cancer

The progression of endometrial cancer (EC) is closely linked to estrogen levels, with UGTs serving as key phase II enzymes involved in steroid hormone detoxification. The role of UGTs in estrogen metabolism and the development of EC has been explored [139]. A total of 100 EC patients and 100 healthy controls was analyzed for UGT gene polymorphisms and estrogen levels, while UGT expression was examined in tumor and adjacent tissues from six EC cases. Results revealed disrupted estrogen homeostasis in EC patients, marked by elevated carcinogenic catechol estrogens (4OHE1, 2OHE1, 2OHE2) and reduced estrogen glucuronides [139]. Moreover, UGT1A8 and UGT2B7 expressions were significantly downregulated in EC tissues, and the genotype distributions of UGT1A8 rs1042597 and UGT2B7 rs7439366 differed notably between patients and controls [139]. The allele frequency analysis revealed that the C allele was more prevalent in EC patients (59%) compared to healthy controls (43.5%), whereas the T allele was more frequent in the control group (56.5%) than in EC patients (41%) [139]. These findings suggest that altered UGT1A8 and UGT2B7 activity and genetic variation may impair estrogen detoxification and play a critical role in the pathogenesis of EC.

4.9. UGT2B and Ovarian Cancer

Grant et al. investigated the associations between genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and related pathway genes with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) among women of African ancestry [140]. Using a custom 533,631-SNP Illumina OncoArray and imputation from the 1000 Genomes reference, data from 755 EOC cases (including 537 high-grade serous ovarian cancer-HGSOC) and 1235 controls were analyzed. Significant associations were found in the UGT2A1/2 region with EOC and in both EGFR and UGT2A1/2 with HGSOC. SNPs of UGT2B4 and UGT2B10 were also associated with EOC [140].
A summary of genetic association studies evaluating variants in UGT2B with cancer susceptibility across different populations is outlined in Table 2, and their relevance to the treatment of cancers is outlined in Table 3. The frequency of mutations/variants among different cancers, and their cooccurrence tendencies is depicted in Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S2. The functional roles of UGT2B in hepatocytes and cancer cells as well as their role in steroid hormone metabolism are depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Table 2. Summary of genetic association studies evaluating variants in UGT2B with cancer susceptibility across different populations.
Table 2. Summary of genetic association studies evaluating variants in UGT2B with cancer susceptibility across different populations.
AuthorsCountry; Population/EthnicityCancer TypeStudy DesignSample Size (Cases/Controls)Enzymes/Gene Variant/RS IDs StudiedGenotyping MethodAdjustment for Confounders (Age, Smoking, BMI, Family History)Inferences
1MacLeod et al. 2000 [100]USA; African American and CaucasianPCaCase–control study64/64UGT2B15 D85Y polymorphismAllele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodControls matched by age, race, and residence countryProstate cancer patients showed a significant excess of homozygosity for the D85 allele
2Gsur et al. 2002 [110]Austria; CaucasianPCaCase–control study (Controls: BPH patients)190/190UGT2B15(D85Y)Oligonucleotide ligation assayControls matched on ageNo association observed between UGT2B15(D85Y) polymorphism and PCa risk
3Hajdinjak et al. 2004 [101]Slovenia; Slovenian CaucasianPCaAssociation study (Case–control)206/178 (Controls: women blood donors)UGT2B15 D85YRFLP assayCorrelation confirmed after age adjustment.D85Y polymorphism correlates with differentiation of PCa. Comparing controls to patients with Gleason score 7 and above, DD homozygosity frequency difference was significant
4Park et al. 2004 [102]USA (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center); White menPCaHospital-based Case–control study (age-matched)155/155UGT2B15 Asp85Tyr (D85Y) polymorphismAllelic-specific PCR analysisAdjusted for age, alcohol consumption, and smoking pack-years.The UGT2B15 Asp85/Asp85 (D/D) genotype increased risk; Overall (Asp/Asp vs. Tyr/Tyr ref)
5Sparks et al. 2004 [121]USA (Western Washington State); Caucasian and Asian womenBC (Risk of ER- or PR- tumor/Hormone concentrations)Prospective cohort study (Cross-sectional analysis of cancer cases)163 CasesUGT1A1 ((TA)6/(TA)7); UGT2B4 (Asp458Glu); UGT2B7 (His268Tyr); UGT2B15 (Asp85Tyr); oligonucleotide ligation assayLogistic regression adjusted for age, menopausal status, BMI, smoking, and parity. Hormone analyses adjusted for age, tamoxifen use, BMI, smoking, alcohol use, and race.UGT2B15 (Hom. variant Asp85Tyr vs. Wild-type ref) associated with reduced risk of ER-tumor
6Lin et al. 2005 [132]China (Shanghai); Chinese Han (Benzidine-exposed workers)BCaCase–control study (Cohort comparison)36/218 (Controls: healthy general population)UGT2B7 802C>T (His268Tyr)PCR-based procedureNone explicitly stated in OR calculations.T/T genotype carriers at elevated bladder cancer risk compared to healthy controls
7Okugi et al. 2006 [103]Japan; Japanese population (Familial PCa)PCaCase–control study102/117 (Controls: healthy age-matched males)UGT2B15, CAG
repeat length of androgen receptor (AR), CYP17, 5 alpha reductase type II (SRD5A2), PSA promoter
genes
PCR-based RFLP methodControls age-matched; adjusted in logistic regression.Analysis showed DD genotype significantly increased PC risk. Presence of Y allele (D/Y + Y/Y vs. D/D ref) was protective. The combination of UGT2B15 and CYP17 identified higher-risk individuals
8Park et al. 2006 [104]USA (Florida, Arkansas); Caucasian and African American menPCaCase–control study420/487 (293 Caucasians cases/367 controls; 127 AA cases/120 controls)UGT2B17 deletion polymorphism (CNV)PCR analysisAdjusted for race, age, and pack-years.UGT2B17 null genotype significantly increased risk, primarily in Caucasians
9Gallagher et al. 2007 [113]USA (Arkansas); CaucasianPCaCase–control study411/397UGT2B17 gene deletion polymorphism (CNV)High-throughput real-time PCR with allelic discriminationAdjusted for age (continuous), smoking pack-years (continuous), and family history of prostate cancer (categorical).No association detected between the UGT2B17 gene deletion polymorphism and prostate cancer risk in Caucasians
10Karypidis et al. 2008 [105]Sweden; Caucasian menPCaPopulation-based case–control study176/161UGT2B17 deletion polymorphism (del/ins, del/del)Real-time PCR (used for gene expression analysis, genotyping method for CNV not explicitly stated)Adjusted for age.Deletion carriers showed increased risk (Del/ins + Del/del vs. Ins/ins ref)
11Park et al. 2007 [106]USA (Tampa, FL); White men (primarily)PCaHospital-based Case–control study356/363 (primarily White)UGT2B17 null polymorphism; HSD3B1 367N>TDideoxy DNA sequencing (examining PCR-amplified DNA)Adjusted for age and family history of prostate cancer.UGT2B17 null genotype was associated with increased PC risk; Combined UGT2B17 null with HSD3B1 367Asn/Asn was also determined to high risk
12Zimmermann et al. 2008 [133]Germany; CaucasianBcaCase–control study (Clinical cases vs. Urological controls)211/210UGT2B7 c.802C>T (His268Tyr)PCR-RFLP procedureStratified by smoking status; Mantel–Haenszel estimates adjusted for smoking.No relevant association observed between UGT2B7 genotypes and increased bladder cancer occurrence in Caucasians; T/T carriers (vs. C/C ref)
13Olsson et al. 2008 [111]Sweden; Swedish men (CAPS study)PCaPopulation-based case–control study followed for mortality2779 Cases/1722 ControlsUGT2B17 deletion (Del/Del genotype)Not explicitly detailed in excerptMatched by age and geographical region.No association found with PC risk or PC death (Del/Del vs. Insertion ref)
14Van der Logt et al. 2009 [137]Netherlands; Caucasian (Dutch)CRC (Sporadic)Case–control study411/600UGT2B7 H268Y polymorphism (*1 and *2 alleles)Dual-color real-time PCR assayORs adjusted for age and gender.No overall difference in genotype distributions
15Setlur et al. 2010 [112]Austria; Caucasian (Tyrol screening program)PCaCase–control study221/205CNV of UGT2B17 and UGT2B28. Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0.Adjusted for ageNo association between UGT2B CNVs and PCA risk. HSD3B1 rs6428830 (AA vs. GG ref) was significantly high risk. Combination of HSD3B1 and SRD5A1 risk alleles also significant
16Hu et al. 2010 [114]Australia; Australian population-based (Caucasian)PCa (Incident cases)Case–control study826/731UGT2B17-155G/A SNP, FOXA1 binding site (promoter)Multiplex PCRRegression models adjusted for age and laboratory assayThe UGT2B7-155A allele shows higher promoter activity than the -155G allele in prostate cancer (LNCaP) cells; the -155G allele weakens FOXA1 binding, reducing promoter stimulation and expression; despite affecting androgen metabolism, the –155G/A polymorphism shows no association with prostate cancer risk
17Haakensen et al. 2010 [123]Norway/USA (Oslo); Women (Caucasian)BC (Mammographic Density correlates)Gene expression analysis of breast biopsies (Cohort with cross-sectional analysis)64 Cancer Patients/79 Healthy ControlsUGT2B7, UGT2B10 (rs1828705), UGT2B11 (Expression/SNPs)GWAS (Illumina Human-1 109K BeadChip); candidate gene study (iPlex, Sequenom MassARRAY)Linear regression predicting MD adjusted for age (forced), BMI, current hormone therapy, age at first birth, and parity.UGT2B10 expression was a significant, independent predictor of MD in women influenced by female hormones. Down-regulation of UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B11 expression associated with higher MD.
18Nadeau et al. 2011 [107]Canada (Quebec) and Asia; Caucasian and Asian menPCa (Biochemical Recurrence—BCR)Cohort study (evaluating outcomes after prostatectomy)846 total men (526 Caucasians; 320 Asians)CNV of UGT2B17, UGT2B28Not explicitly specified in excerpt (CNV analysis performed)Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for age, PSA, Gleason score, T stage, Nodal status, hormonotherapy, and UGT2B17/UGT2B28 status.Deletion copies of UGT2B genes increased the risk of PSA recurrence (BCR) in Caucasians (1 deletion vs. 0 ref). In Asians UGT2B17 (2 deletions vs. ≤1 deletion ref) posed significant risk. Combined UGT2B17 + UGT2B28 (≥2 deletions vs. ≤1 deletion ref) posed risk in both Caucasians and Asians.
19Sun et al. 2011 [118]USA, Barbados, Nigeria; African ancestryBCCase–control study1261/825UGT2B4 tag SNP rs13129471 (upstream region)Custom Taqman assayNot explicitly listed in excerpt for odds ratio calculationSNP rs13129471 (A allele) associated with increased breast cancer risk; overall (Heterozygote vs. G/G ref)
20Parmar et al. 2011 [141]Austria (TIGER cohort)BCPharmacogenetic study (PGt) based on a retrospective cohort745 total BC patients (205 epirubicin-treated)UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism (802 C>T)Validated TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay via Real-time PCRTumor size, age at diagnosis, nodal status, histological gradeBC patients carrying the UGT2B7 (Tyr/Tyr) genotype may derive the greatest benefit from adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy, demonstrating longer invasive disease-free survival. This effect was more pronounced when subsequent tamoxifen treatment was administered.
21Sun et al. 2012 [142]USA, Barbados, Nigeria; African ancestryBCCase–control study (Combined 3 populations)1287/851UGT2B15 D85Y (rs1902023); UGT2B15 T523K (rs4148269); UGT2B7 H268Y (rs7439366)Commercial TaqMan assaysAdjusted for population indicator variable in logistic regression.Lack of association between common UGT2B nonsynonymous SNPs and breast cancer in populations of African ancestry
22Aschebrook-Kilfoy et al. 2012 [138]USA; European ancestryPapillary Thyroid Cancer (PTC)Nested case–control study within a cohort (USRT) + hospital cases (UTMDACC)344/4521647 tagging SNPs in 132 genes/regions; UGT2B7 SNPs (rs7657426, rs4986993, rs9650592, rs7606254, rs194243, rs7387059, rs7837181, rs3924192, rs3924194, rs975612, rs11681809, rs15561)Custom-designed iSelect Infinium assay (Tagging SNPs)Adjusted for gender, age, and year of birth. Interaction analyses adjusted for alcohol or tobacco use.UGT2B7, SOD1, CYP8B1, MTF2, GSTT1, DHRS9 and FMO3 were associated with PTC. All of genetic regions not significant after multiple comparison correction.
23Dura et al. 2012 [131]Netherlands; CaucasianEsophageal Cancer (ESCC, EAC)Case–control study351 (85 ESCC, 260 EAC)/592UGT1A1; UGT1A6, UGT1A7, UGT1A8; UGT2B4; UGT2B7; UGT2B17 (Enzyme activity/Genotype groups)Various PCR-based assays (e.g., PCR-RFLP, real-time PCR)Matched for age, ethnicity, gender. Stratified by histology.UGT2B4 high- and medium-activity genotypes are protective against ESCC; UGT1A8 high-activity genotype decreased ESCC risk; UGT1A1 high-activity genotype increased ESCC risk; haplotype UGT2B7 + UGT2B17 mutation (011) reduced ESCC risk
24Eskandari-Nasab et al. 2012 [124]Iran; Iranian populationBCCase–control study236/203 (expression assay in 62 breast cancerous and 62 adjacent noncancerous tissue)UGT2B17 null genotype (CNV); multiplex PCR assay; PCR allele-specific amplification; quantitative reverse transcriptase PCRLogistic regression adjusted for ageUGT2B17 null genotype significantly increased cancer risk; DHFR 19 bp ins/del polymorphism showed no association; NGX6 mRNA levels were significantly lower in cancerous tissue
25Vidal et al. 2013 [108]USA; African American and Caucasian (Multiethnic)PCaHospital-based case–control study233/342UGT2B15 (rs4148269, rs3100, rs9994887, rs13112099, rs7686914, rs7696472, rs1580083, rs1960773); UGT2B17 (rs7435827, rs7686008, rs7671342, rs59678213); Cis acting at UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 (rs17147338, rs2168047); Cis acting at UGT2B17 (rs6822259)Sequenom-iPlex GenotypingAdjusted for age, race, and BMI.Six UGT2B15 SNPs (rs4148269, rs3100, rs9994887, rs7686914, rs7696472, and rs13112099) and a cis acting (rs17147338) associated with increased PC risk
26Angstadt et al. 2013 [134]USA (Pennsylvania); CaucasianCRCPopulation-based case–control study665/621UGT2B17, UGT2B28 (CNVs)TaqMan Copy Number Assays (Custom and Predesigned) using 7900-HT real-time PCR in quadruplicate.Multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, first degree family history, NSAID use, and physical activity.UGT2B17 (0/0) genotype showed decreased overall CRC risk, specifically in rectal cancer and in males. No association found for UGT2B28.
27Gruber et al. 2013 [125]Austria; Austrian CaucasianLung CancerRetrospective case–control study453/449UGT2B17 (CNV)Conventional PCR followed by sequencing verificationAdjusted for gender, smoking status, and histologic subtype.No significant association observed between UGT2B17 CNV and lung cancer risk or outcome
28Grant et al. 2013 [109]USA (Durham, NC); Black and White menPcaHospital-based case–control studyUGT2B15D85Y: 92 Cases/297 Controls; UGT2B17 CNV: 148 Cases/201 ControlsUGT2B17 CNV, rs7434408; UGT2B15 D85Y (rs1902023); UGT2B7 (rs7435335)Sequenom-iPlexAdjusted for age and race.UGT2B15 D85/D85 (G/G) homozygosity associated with increased risk (G/G vs. T/T ref); UGT2B17 CNV, two-copy genotype associated with higher androstane-3a,17b-diol-glucuronide levels in Whites but not in Blacks
29Vulsteke et al. 2013 [143]Leuven, BelgiumBCRetrospective cohort study1012 female breast cancer cases who received 3–6 cycles of FEC as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapyTwenty-six SNPs in 16 genes, including UGT2B7 (rs7668282)Sequenom MassARRAYPrimary growth factor use, age, BMI, and number of planned cyclesUGT2B7 rs7668282 C-allele carriers were also associated with prolonged grade 4 or deep neutropenia
30Scherer et al. 2014 [144]Multi-site (CCFR); CaucasianCRCMatched case–sibling control study (CCFR)1584/2516 (Unaffected sibling controls)Total of 35 functional polymorphisms including UGT familz member genes UGT2B15; UGT2B4; UGT1A3; UGT1A6TaqMan assaysAdjusted for age, sex; BMI, pack-years, and physical activity were also adjusted for NSAID interactionUGT2B15, TG heterozygotes and G alleles had increased CRC risk (vsTT); individuals homozygous for the UGT2B15 minor allele, who used aspirin, had higher CRC risk (vs T/T non-users); Ibuprofen users homozygous for UGT2B4 major alleles had increased risk (vs. major alleles homozygous, non-users)
31Angstadt et al. 2014 [145]USA (Pennsylvania); CaucasianCRCPopulation-based case–control study857/932 (UGT2B analysis)9 UGT1A and 5 UGT2B genes. Analysis included 85 SNPs in UGT1A and 12 SNPs along with one deletion/insertion polymorphism in UGT2BIllumina
GoldenGate genotyping assay
Multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, family history, NSAID use, and physical activity.UGT1A10 exon 1 (T-G haplotype; rs17864678, rs10929251) decreased colon cancer risk both proximal and distal; UGT1A 3′ flanking region (C-T-G haplotype; rs7578153; rs10203853; rs6728940) increased CRC risk in males; UGT2B15 haplotype (rs4148269, K523T + rs6837575) increased rectal cancer risk overall and in females; UGT1A shared exon haplotype (A-G-T; rs6717546, rs1500482, rs7586006) with high NSAID use and decreased CRC risk
32Hu et al. 2015 [15]Southwest China; Chinese HanEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)Case–control study investigating Copy Number Variations (CNVs)404/402CNV of UGT2B28, UGT2B17, and other genes e.g., PLEC Custom Multiplex AccuCopy KitAdjusted for age, gender, smoking/drinking status, and family cancer history.Copy number loss of UGT2B28 conferred increased ESCC risk (UGT2B28 Deletion carriers vs. 2 copies as ref) associated with decreased UGT2B28 mRNA expression in tumor tissues; PLEC copy number gain also increased ESCC risk; Concordant germline and somatic CNV alterations observed for PLEC, UGT2B17, and UGT2B28, but not for other loci
33Habibi et al. 2017 [115]Iran; Iranian populationPCa and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)Case–control study (PC vs. BPH vs. Controls)120 (PC)/120 (Healthy Controls)/120 (BPH)UGT2B15 D85Y (rs1902023); CNV of UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 lociPCR-RFLP for UGT2B15 D85YQuestionnaire covered smoking, BMI, PSA level (no explicit adjustment used in ORs provided).No association found between UGT2B15 D85Y, UGT2B17 CNV, or UGT2B28 CNV and PC risk. UGT2B17 deletion genotypes significantly more frequent in BPH vs. healthy controls
34Grant et al. 2017 [68]USA (Duke University/VA Medical Center); Black (48%) and Non-black (52%) menPCa (Biochemical Recurrence—BCR)Cohort study (evaluation post-prostatectomy)190 total patientsUGT2B15, UGT2B17, and UGT2B28 (Expression levels, measured by percent positive cells and H-score)Immunohistochemical detection (IHC)Adjusted for PSA, age, pathological Gleason score, race, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion (Cox model).UGT2B17 overexpression (High vs. Low ref) was associated with BCR risk. Crude HR = 1.638 (95% CI 1.050, 2.557). Adjusted HR = 1.547 (95% CI 0.985, 2.433)
35AL-Eitan et al. 2019 [120]Jordan; Jordanian–Arab populationBCCase–control study218/219UGT2B7 (rs28365062, rs4348159); Not explicitly statedModified Bonferroni procedure applied. Crude ORs provided.No significant association found between the investigated UGT2B7 SNPs and BC risk. rs4348159 (TT vs. CC ref): OR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.41–2.88).
36He et al. 2018 [119]China (Zhengzhou); Chinese HanBCRetrospective case–control study672/670UGT2B7 tagSNPs (rs12233719, rs4356975, rs7435335, rs7441774)MALDI-TOF MSAdjusted for conventional risk factors (e.g., age, BMI, menopausal status, family history) via multiple logistic regression.UGT2B7 rs7441774 G allele associated with increased breast cancer risk. GG genotype: adjusted OR = 1.63 (95% CI 1.18–2.26)
37Grant et al. 2019 [140]Multi-site (AACES, OCAC); African Ancestry (AA) womenEpithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) and High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSOC)Combined case–control study (pooled from consortia: GAME-ON project)EOC: 755/1235 (Total N = 1990). HGSOC: 537/1235 (Total N = 1772).Several SNPs in VDR, UGT2B, UGT1A, UGT2A1/2,22 SNPs in UGT2B4 and 1 SNP of UGT2B10Illumina OncoArray (533,631 SNP array), followed by imputation (Minimac3) to 1000 Genomes Phase 3 v5 reference set.Adjusted for two principal components (PCs) of ancestry using logistic regression.African American OncoArray analysis showed SNPs of UGT2B4 and UGT2B10 associated with EOC. Bayesian False Discovery Probability analysis confirmed significant SNP associations with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in the UGT2A1/2 region (rs10017134) and with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in the EGFR (rs114972508) and UGT2A1/2 (rs1017134) regions
38Qian et al. 2021 [126]China (Shenyang, Tianjin); Never-smoking Chinese women (Han ethnic)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Two-stage, case–control studyTraining: 417/368; Validation: 282/282UGT2B7 rs12233719 (G>T); UGT2B7 rs7439366TaqMan methodMultivariate logistic regression adjusted by age and family history of cancer.UGT2B7 rs12233719 T allele associated with increased NSCLC risk
39Zhao et al. 2020 [139]China (Xuzhou Central Hospital); (likely Chinese Han)Endometrial Cancer (EC)Case–control study100 EC patients/100 healthy subjectsUGT1A8 rs1042597; UGT2B7 rs7439366PCR followed by ABI sequencing.Subjects were excluded based on narrow BMI range (18.5–24.99), menarche age (12–16 y), and smoking history. Age difference was assessed and found non-significant.The distribution of genotypes for both SNPs was significantly different between cases and controls. UGT1A8 rs1042597: Genotype frequencies (CC, CG, GG) significantly differed. UGT2B7 rs7439366: Genotype frequencies (CC, CT, TT) significantly differed. Allele frequencies (C/T) significantly differed (C allele higher in cases, 59% vs. 43.5%). The study infers that these polymorphisms may influence altered circulating hormones and EC risk
PCa, prostate cancer; BC, breast cancer; BCa, bladder cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; EC, esophageal cancer; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; BCR, biochemical recurrence; ER-/PR-, estrogen/progesterone receptor negative; MD, mammographic density.
Table 3. Overview of pharmacogenetic studies investigating the influence of UGT2B polymorphisms on chemotherapy treatment outcomes.
Table 3. Overview of pharmacogenetic studies investigating the influence of UGT2B polymorphisms on chemotherapy treatment outcomes.
AuthorsCountry; Population/EthnicityCancer TypeStudy DesignSample Size (Cases/Controls)Enzymes/Gene Variant/RS IDs StudiedGenotyping MethodAdjustment for Confounders (Age, Smoking, BMI, Family History)Inferences
1Parmar et al. 2011 [141]Austria; Austrian Caucasian (TIGER cohort)BC (Adjuvant treatment outcome)Pharmacogenetic cohort study745 total patients (205 received epirubicin)UGT2B7 His268Tyr (c.802 C>T)TaqMan assays (Real Time PCR System 7300)Adjusted for tumor size, age at diagnosis, nodal status, and histological grade (Cox model).The UGT2B7 His268Tyr (802 C>T) was associated with shorter invasive disease-free survival after epirubicin treatment. (Tyr/Tyr vs. His allele carriers ref)
2Ahern et al. 2011 [146]Denmark (Jutland Peninsula); Caucasian womenBC (Recurrence in Tamoxifen-treated survivors)Nested case–control study within a population-based cohortER+/TAM+ Group: 541/541; ER−/TAM− Group: 300/300UGT2B15*2 (rs1902023, 85 D>Y); UGT2B7*2 (rs7439366, 268 H>Y); UGT1A8*3 (rs17863762, 277 C>Y)Applied Biosystems kits (C-27028164-10, C-34418788-20) and custom TaqMan kit for proxy SNP (rs7434332)Adjusted for tumor stage, menopausal status, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy/radiotherapy, type of surgery, time to recurrence, and histologic grade.No association found between UGT polymorphisms and breast cancer recurrence risk in either tamoxifen-treated or non-tamoxifen-treated groups; UGT2B15*2 (Two variant alleles vs. 2 normal alleles ref)
3Sawyer et al. 2016 [147]Not specified (Multi-center study)Early stage BC receiving epirubicin (FEC regimen)Prospective pharmacogenetic study132 women enrolled (26 CC, 63 CT, 37 TT)UGT2B7c.-161 C>T germline SNP (rs7668258)PSQ 96 HSA genotyping system (pyrosequencing)Not availableThe CC genotype showed significantly reduced epirubicin clearance compared with those with CT or TT genotypes. Also, CC homozygotes were at an increased risk of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia compared with TT homozygotes or heterozygotes; TT homozygotes or heterozygotes had an increased risk of early recurrence
4Li et al. 2019 [148]Wuhan, China (Chinese BC patients)BCProspective cohort study427 BC patients (141 CC, 196 CT, 90 TT)UGT2B7-161 single-nucleotide polymorphism (C>T, rs7668258)PCR amplification followed by pyrosequencing on the PSQTM96MA SystemAge, BMI, smoking, hypertension, TNM stage, cumulative dose of epirubicin, administration of trastuzumab, cTnI, NT-proBNPThe UGT2B7-161 T allele independently predicts a low occurrence of cardiotoxicity in BC patients undergoing EC-D adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiotoxicity rate was lowest in the TT group (1.1%).
5Joy et al. 2021 [149]Canada (Caucasian 87%)Early stage BCProspective dose-tailoring study (intrapatient dose escalation trial)45 early-stage BC patients (10 CC, 21 CT, 14 TT genotypes)UGT2B7-161 promoter polymorphism (C>T, rs7668258)PSQ 96 HSA genotyping system (Pyrosequencing AB)None specified for primary toxicity/survival, though PK covariates such as body weight, height, body surface area, lean body mass, age, and liver function are considered in the modelPharmacogenetically guided epirubicin dosing (escalating doses for CT/TT genotypes) is feasible and well-tolerated, as leukopenia rates remained comparable across all genotypes after dose escalation.
6Jian Li et al. 2022 [150]Shenzhen, China (Chinese HER-2 positive BC patients)HER-2 positive BCCohort study/Exploratory study50 patients (24 CC, 15 CT, 11 TT) and 30 healthy controlsUGT2B7-161 single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs7668258)PCR kit and the 7900HT PCR instrument; ABI 3730XL sequencerLogistic Multivariate Regression included UGT2B7-161 genotypes, BMI, hyperurecemia and cardiac troponin I (cTnI)The UGT2B7-161 SNP is a potential predictive factor for cardiotoxicity (assessed by myocardial work decreased events using PSL) in HER-2 positive BC patients receiving dual-targeted therapy. The CC genotype had a significantly higher incidence of myocardial work decrease events (41.7%) compared to CT + TT (12.5%). The BMI, and cTnI were also other independent factors affecting the occurrence of myocardial toxicity
7Kruger et al. 2026 [59]South Africa; Women of Mixed and African Ancestry receiving tamoxifenBCObservational pharmacogenetic association study in tamoxifen-treated cohort166 breast cancer patients (no separate controls reported)UGT2B7: rs7439366
UGT2B15: rs4148269
Mass spectrometry-based genotyping assay
Sanger DNA sequencing
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based genotyping
TaqMan real-time PCR copy number assay
Copy number variation (CNV) genotyping assay
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) platform
Logistic regression and Bonferroni correction. Musculoskeletal complaints associated with UGT2B7 rs7439366 and CYP3A4 rs2242480. Gynecological symptoms associated with SULT1A2*2, SULT1E1 rs3736599, and UGT2B15 rs4148269. Hot flashes showed no significant pharmacogenetic association. Findings support the relevance of pharmacogenetic variability in tamoxifen tolerability in African populations.
BC, breast cancer; EC, endometrial cancer; FEC, 5-Fluorouracil + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide.

5. UGT2B Polymorphisms Clinical Implications and Pharmacogenomics

Scherer et al. examined whether genetic variations in NSAID-metabolizing enzymes, particularly CYP2C9 and UGT genes, affect the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and modify the protective effect of NSAIDs. Using data from 1584 CRC cases and 2516 sibling controls in the Colon Cancer Family Registry, researchers analyzed 35 functional polymorphisms [144]. They found that specific variants UGT1A6 GAA (Ala7Thr181Arg184) and UGT2B15 Asp85 were associated with increased CRC risk. Additionally, significant gene–NSAID interactions were identified, including between UGT1A3 Thr78Thr and NSAID use, UGT2B4 variants and ibuprofen use, and UGT2B15 Tyr85Asp and aspirin use. These findings suggest that UGT polymorphisms may influence both CRC susceptibility and the chemopreventive efficacy of NSAIDs, underscoring the importance of pharmacogenetic profiling in CRC prevention strategies [144].
Ning et al. examined the impact of UGT2B7 gene polymorphisms on the efficacy of morphine for cancer pain in 120 Chinese Han patients receiving morphine via patient controlled analgesia [151]. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points up to 72 h, and plasma morphine levels were determined alongside genotyping for UGT2B7 c.802C>T and c.221G>T variants. The c.802C>T polymorphism showed significant influence: patients with CT or TT genotypes had higher VAS scores (indicating poorer analgesic response) and higher plasma morphine concentrations than those with the CC genotype. No significant differences were observed for c.221G>T genotypes. These findings suggest that the UGT2B7 c.802C>T variant, but not c.221G>T, affects morphine metabolism and analgesic efficacy in Chinese Han patients with cancer pain [151].
Several studies have assessed the role of UGT2B polymorphisms in patients with breast cancer receiving epirubicin-based chemotherapy, providing evidence for the potential role of pharmacogenomics in improving treatment safety/outcomes. A prospective study examined the impact of the UGT2B7 c.161C>T SNP on epirubicin treatment outcomes in women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy [147]. Patients with the CC genotype showed significantly lower epirubicin clearance and had a higher risk of severe leukopenia (grade 3–4) compared to CT and TT carriers. Conversely, TT and CT genotypes were associated with a higher risk of early cancer recurrence [147]. These findings suggest that the UGT2B7 c.161 C>T polymorphism influences both drug toxicity and efficacy, supporting its potential as a pharmacogenetic marker for tailoring epirubicin-based treatment. The effect of UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism in 745 non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin-based chemotherapy was also studied [141]. Among the 205 epirubicin-treated patients, those with the Tyr/Tyr genotype had significantly longer invasive disease-free survival compared to carriers of at least one His allele. The survival benefit was even greater in patients who also received tamoxifen [141]. No survival difference was observed in patients not treated with epirubicin. These findings suggest that the UGT2B7 268Tyr/Tyr genotype may predict better outcomes with epirubicin and support its potential as a biomarker for personalized breast cancer therapy. Similarly, Parmar et al. investigated the impact of the UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism on invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in 745 non-metastatic breast cancer patients from the Austrian TIGER cohort. Among 205 patients treated with epirubicin-based chemotherapy, those homozygous for the 268Tyr allele (Tyr/Tyr) had a longer mean IDFS of 8.6 years compared to 7.5 years in patients carrying at least one 268His allele (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.64; p = 0.014) [141]. The effect was more pronounced in patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen (adjusted HR = 5.22; p = 0.015) [141]. No significant differences in IDFS were observed in patients who did not receive epirubicin [141].
Vulsteke et al. showed that variants in UGT2B7 (C-allele carriers of the rs7668282) were associated with febrile neutropenia (FN) in breast cancer cases receiving FEC regimen. However, after correcting for multiple testing (FDR), only rs4148350 (T allele) in ABCC1 remained significantly associated with FN. Nevertheless, UGT2B7 (C-allele carriers of the rs7668282) was associated with prolonged grade 4 neutropenia, which persisted significantly after multiple testing corrections [143].
Joy et al. evaluated whether UGT2B7c.-161 C>T promoter polymorphism carriers could safely tolerate higher epirubicin doses. Forty-five women with non-metastatic breast cancer received standard FE100C in the first cycle, followed by genotype-based dose escalation in subsequent cycles (up to 130 mg/m2 for CT and 140 mg/m2 for TT patients). Leukopenia incidence increased with dose in CT and TT groups but remained comparable to CC patients at standard doses [149]. The findings suggest that genotype-guided epirubicin dosing enables safe dose escalation without added toxicity [149]. Similarly, Li et al. evaluated the relationship between the UGT2B7-161 C>T polymorphism and cardiotoxicity in 427 Chinese breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-docetaxel (EC-D) adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were genotyped as CC (n = 141), CT (n = 196), and TT (n = 90). Cardiotoxicity was defined by a ≥10% decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to <53%, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, or fatal arrhythmia [148]. LVEF decreased significantly during and up to 12 months after chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Cardiotoxicity occurred in 4.2% of patients overall and was lowest in the TT group (1.1%), compared to CT (3.1%) and CC (7.8%) (p = 0.026) [148]. Multivariate analysis indicated that the T allele independently predicted lower cardiotoxicity (p = 0.004) [148]. This observation was supported by the investigation by Li et al. among 50 Chinese HER-2 positive breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy [150]. Blood samples were collected at baseline to determine UGT2B7c.-161 genotypes, and myocardial function parameters were measured before treatment and after four therapy cycles. Among the patients, 35 experienced decreased myocardial work, with occurrences varying by genotype: CC 41.7%, CT 12.5%, and TT 12.5% (p < 0.001) [150]. Multivariate analysis identified UGT2B7-161 genotype, body mass index, and cardiac troponin I as independent predictors of cardiotoxicity.
Functional polymorphisms in genes coding for UGT enzymes (UGT2B152, UGT2B72, UGT1A8*3) may also affect breast cancer recurrence in women treated with tamoxifen, but no clear evidence is available [146]. Among 541 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/tamoxifen-treated and 300 ER-negative/untreated cases (matched with controls), no significant association was found between any UGT polymorphism and recurrence risk [146]. Results remained consistent even when stratified by CYP2D6*4 genotype, another key tamoxifen metabolizing gene [146]. These findings indicate that UGT genetic variants do not influence tamoxifen treatment outcomes, and genotyping these UGT polymorphisms is not supported for predicting breast cancer recurrence. A similar study evaluated the impact of genetic variation in UGT1A4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15 on tamoxifen metabolism in Asian breast cancer patients [152]. In 240 healthy individuals from Chinese, Malay, and Indian populations, haplotype tagging SNPs were identified and then tested in 202 tamoxifen-treated patients. The UGT1A4*3 haplotype (142T>G; L48V) was significantly associated with the increased formation of TAMN glucuronide, showing a twofold higher TAMN glucuronide/TAM ratio (p < 0.0001). UGT2B7 variants showed no significant effect on the O-glucuronidation of active metabolites (4OHT, endoxifen), and UGT2B15 haplotypes had only a modest influence on (E) endoxifen levels after adjusting for CYP2D6 genotypes [152]. These results highlight the key role of UGT1A4 polymorphisms in tamoxifen glucuronidation in Asians, with UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 variants contributing minimally.
Gene expression of UGT2B family members may aid in identifying the non-responders in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer treatment. Gil et al. investigated molecular biomarkers predictive of response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in HER2 positive, hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer [153]. Tissue samples from women who received NAT at several hospitals in Andalusia, Spain, were analyzed. These patients were treated with standard chemotherapy (taxanes and/or anthracyclines) alongside antiHER2 agents such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab and categorized as responders (achieving pathological complete response) or non-responders. Microarray analysis in a discovery cohort (n = 20) revealed 954 differentially expressed transcripts. Five genes from the UGT2B family, UGT2B10, UGT2B11, UGT2B15, UGT2B17, and UGT2B28, were selected for validation. qPCR in an independent cohort (n = 40) showed overexpression of these genes in non-responders, with UGT2B15 demonstrating statistically significant association [153]. As UGT2B family genes are involved in drug detoxification, UGT2B15 may influence drug metabolism and predict treatment response, warranting further research.
Few studies have looked at UGT polymorphisms in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Analyzing 320 CLL patients and 449 healthy donors, Gruber et al. found that high UGT2B17 expression was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, such as reduced treatment-free and overall survival in patients with CLL [154]. Elevated mRNA levels correlated closely with increased glucuronidation activity toward androgens and the anticancer drug vorinostat. Notably, UGT2B17 was upregulated following fludarabine treatment, especially in poor responders. Furthermore, after knocking down UGT2B17 in MEC1 CLL cells, gene expression profiling revealed significant changes in multiple pathways, indicating that UGT2B17 actively influences key cellular functions rather than being a passive gene product. Overall, the study identified UGT2B17 as a functionally relevant biomarker in CLL with potential therapeutic implications [154]. Rouleau et al. explored the regulatory mechanisms underlying the expression of UGT2B17 [155]. Using RNA sequencing and qPCR, the study found that in both normal and leukemic B cells, UGT2B17 is expressed exclusively through alternative transcripts distinct from the canonical transcript seen in liver and intestine. Furthermore, genomic and chromatin accessibility data (ATACseq) revealed the presence of alternative promoters, some likely derived from retrotransposons. Functional assays identified key binding sites for transcription factors STAT3, NFκB (RELA), and IRFs, which drive UGT2B17 expression in CLL cells. These findings suggest that a NFκB/STAT3/IRF/UGT2B17 axis may play a pivotal role in CLL progression and therapeutic resistance [155]. These factors are activated through key signaling pathways; STAT3 via the JAK pathway, and NFκB/IRFs via B cell receptor (BCR) signaling and Syk activation. Inhibitors targeting these pathways, such as Syk inhibitors (e.g., entospletinib) and JAK inhibitors (e.g., ruxolitinib), can disrupt the activation of these transcription factors. The pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 and NFκB led to reduced UGT2B17 promoter activity in luciferase assays, suggesting that Syk/JAK inhibition may downregulate UGT2B17 expression by interfering with its upstream regulatory axis [155].
See Supplementary Table S1 for UGT2B gene variant frequencies from populations to populations; this can alter their relevance in predicting not only UGT2B family member-mediated treatment outcomes but also disease risks. A genome-wide association study among 2239 smokers from five ethnic groups in the Multiethnic Cohort to examine genetic variants influencing nicotine and cotinine glucuronidation mediated by UGT2B10 showed association that fifteen key SNPs explained up to 33% of metabolic variation in cotinine glucuronidation, with the strongest association at rs115765562. The other two SNPs showing high significance were UGT2B10 splice site variant, rs116294140, and rs6175900 (Asp67Tyr). The top SNP for nicotine glucuronidation (rs116224959) showed strong linkage with rs115765562 [156]. Another study examined nicotine metabolism across five ethnic groups, African American, Native Hawaiian, White, Latino, and Japanese American smokers, focusing on the roles of CYP2A6 (C oxidation), UGT2B10 (N glucuronidation), and FMO3 (N oxidation). Marked ethnic differences were observed: C oxidation was lowest in Japanese Americans and Native Hawaiians, while N glucuronidation was lowest in African Americans [157]. Two UGT2B10 variants, a missense mutation (Asp67Tyr, rs61750900) and a splice variant (rs116294140), together explained about 33% of the variability in nicotine glucuronidation, with the splice variant being the major contributor to reduced glucuronidation, particularly among African Americans [157]. Overall, findings highlight that genetic and ethnic variation in nicotine metabolism pathways influences smoking behavior and may contribute to ethnic disparities in lung cancer risk.

6. UGT2B and Cancer-Tissue Studies

Studies have employed primary human tissue, microsomes, or clinical cohort data to establish the oncological relevance and coordinated expression of UGTs [43,158,159,160,161]. Keading et al. demonstrated that calcitriol downregulates UGT2B15 and UGT2B17, which are key enzymes that inactivate androgens in prostate cancer cells (LNCaP and 22Rv1) [78]. Calcitriol treatment led to reduced glucuronidation of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and its metabolites, along with significant decreases in UGT2B15/17 mRNA and protein levels [78]. Since androgens fuel prostate cancer growth, this suppression of androgen inactivation by calcitriol may counteract its intended antiproliferative effects, highlighting a potential limitation in using calcitriol for prostate cancer therapy. Jones and Lazarus (2014) characterized UGT2B expression levels in human tissues targeted by tobacco carcinogens [160]. Using quantitative expression analysis across multiple human tissues (e.g., tonsil, lung, liver, aerodigestive tract), the study inferred that extrahepatic UGT2B expression is highest in the tonsil, comparable to liver levels. Furthermore, specific UGT2B enzymes (e.g., UGTs 2B10, 2B11, 2B17) are expressed and coordinately regulated in these target sites for tobacco-related cancers [160].
Invasive cancers commonly exhibit enhanced aerobic glycolysis and de novo lipid biosynthesis. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), key phase II metabolizing enzymes, normally facilitate the glucuronidation and elimination of lipids; however, their dysregulation in cancer cells may lead to the accumulation of bioactive lipids that promote tumor progression [162]. This study hypothesized that UGT2B isoforms are downregulated in cancer cells and that restoring their expression could reduce lipid accumulation, alter cellular phenotype, and suppress proliferation. Steady state mRNA levels of UGT2B isoforms were quantified by qPCR in four breast cancer and five pancreatic cancer cell lines. Expression plasmids encoding UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15 isoforms involved in lipid glucuronidation were transfected into MCF7 and Panc1 cells [162]. Cell viability and cytotoxicity were assessed using trypan blue exclusion, annexin V/PI staining, TUNEL assays, and caspase3 immunohistochemistry. Overexpression of each UGT2B isoform significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased cell death in both cell lines, accompanied by a marked reduction in intracellular lipid levels [162]. These findings support the hypothesis that UGT2B enzymes modulate lipid homeostasis and proliferation in cancer cells, highlighting their potential role as “lipid regulators” and therapeutic targets in cancer management.
UGT2B member function is not only governed by genetic variants and expression, but also mediated by epigenetic changes mediated by miRNAs. Wijayakumara et al. (2017) described novel miRNA-mediated regulation pathways for UGT2B4 and UGT2B7 [161]. Functional assays in HepG2 and Huh7 liver cancer cell lines were complemented by correlative analysis using normal human tissue panels and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. The core inference confirmed that miR3664 controls UGT2B7, and miR135a and miR410 control UGT2B4 expression, which are mechanisms supported by inverse correlations observed in clinical cohorts and tissue panels [161]. The same group also investigated the regulation of UGT2B15 by miR3315p, focusing on the characterization of its target sites [159]. Experiments in prostate cancer cells, validated using a tissue RNA panel and TCGA data, inferred that miR3315p represses UGT2B15 activity via the cooperative action of canonical and non-canonical 3′UTR sites. Crucially, this post-transcriptional mechanism differentially regulates UGT2B15 without affecting UGT2B17 [159]. Furthermore, Margaillan et al. 2016 analyzed the epigenetic regulation of androgen inactivating UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 by microRNAs in prostate cancer progression [158]. Using reporter assays in HEK293 cells and ectopic expression in prostate cancer cells, followed by the analysis of UGT/miRNA levels in prostatic tumors and metastases, the study inferred that miR376c directly downregulates both UGTs. This action reduces androgen inactivation and enhances cell proliferation, and the observed inverse correlation in clinical specimens suggests miR376c critically influences steroid metabolism during cancer progression [158].
Another observational study by Pâquet et al. analyzed UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 expression in prostate cancer using tissue samples from a cohort of 239 patients, including 127 prostate cancer cases and 112 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) controls collected at Laval University (Québec) and the University of British Columbia (Vancouver) [163]. mRNA levels were quantified by real-time PCR, and protein expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry. While neither UGT2B15 nor UGT2B17 expression correlated significantly with Gleason score, UGT2B17 was significantly upregulated in all tumor grades and was fivefold higher in metastases compared with benign tissue [163]. In contrast, UGT2B15 expression was markedly decreased in both treatment-naive and castration-resistant tumors and was undetectable in lymph node metastases. These results demonstrate that UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 are differentially regulated during prostate cancer progression, with UGT2B15 downregulated and UGT2B17 upregulated, suggesting distinct roles in disease advancement and metastasis [163].
The studies involving exclusive in vitro elucidation of UGT expression and function with oncology context have employed hepatic, prostate and melanoma cancer cell lines [19,164,165,166]. Dluzen et al. established that miR216b5p represses UGT2B7, 2B4, and 2B10 expression in HuH7 and Hep3B liver cancer cell lines, resulting in significant decreases in glucuronidation activity against specific substrates (e.g., epirubicin, codeine, nicotine) [166]. Hu et al. (2014) characterized the regulation of UGT2B7, the primary epirubicin (EPI) inactivating enzyme, in response to EPI exposure [164]. Utilizing promoter construct analysis and p53 manipulation in HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines, the study inferred that EPI promotes its own detoxification by upregulating UGT2B7 through a p53-mediated pathway involving a specific p53 response element (p53RE). This mechanism may contribute to tumor resistance and reduced cardiotoxicity compared to other anthracyclines [164]. Functional testing in LNCaP prostate cancer cells showed that miR376c negatively regulates both UGT2B15 and 2B17 by binding to their 3′UTRs. This reduces UGT2B15/UGT2B17 mRNA/protein levels and inhibits testosterone/androsterone glucuronidation, representing the first evidence of miRNA-mediated control for these UGTs in prostate cancer [165].
Dellinger et al. (2012) elucidated UGT expression loss and re-expression in melanoma [19]. Using primary melanoma lines (WM115, WM3211) and metastatic melanoma cell lines, the researchers inferred that while UGT2B7, 2B10, and 2B15 expression is lost during progression, it is inducible by anticancer agents. Crucially, UGT2B7 knockdown sensitized WM115 cells to adriamycin/epirubicin, suggesting that inducible UGT re-expression constitutes an unsuspected mechanism for intratumoral drug resistance in melanoma [19]. Another study investigating the regulatory role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on detoxification enzymes UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 in prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) found that EGF treatment suppressed the expression of UGT2B15, UGT2B17, and DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B, while the inhibition of EGFR with PD16893 reversed these effects [167]. Treatment with the methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine or DNMT3B siRNA markedly reduced UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 expression, indicating epigenetic regulation via DNMT3B-dependent methylation. Analysis of prostate cancer versus benign prostate tissue using Illumina 450K Methylation Array data revealed differential hypomethylation of UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 in tumors. Collectively, the findings suggest that epigenetic dysregulation and hypomethylation of these genes may contribute to prostate cancer risk and progression, highlighting their potential as biomarkers or therapeutic targets [167].
UGT2B7 showed two mutually exclusive exon 1 variants, each regulated by a distinct 5′ promoter. The developmental switch toward the expression of the functional enzyme was shown to occur during kidney maturation. In contrast, neoplastic cells exhibited a reversal to the inactive form, thereby showing reduced glucuronidation capacity [168]. Similarly, quantitative profiling of human renal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases revealed that neoplastic kidney tissues have markedly reduced glucuronidation capacity compared with normal kidneys, accompanied by substantial decreases in UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 mRNA and protein expression [169]. These findings are corroborated by Matsumoto et al., who investigated the expression and genetic variants of UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tissues from Japanese patients. All three UGT enzymes were significantly downregulated in RCC tissues compared with normal kidney tissue [170]. Importantly, the UGT2B7c.-161C>T variant and higher UGT2B7 mRNA expression were associated with better cancer-specific survival and overall survival, respectively [170]. Thus, UGT2B7 expression and its genetic variant were identified as independent prognostic factors, suggesting that UGT2B7 may play a protective role in RCC progression and could serve as a prognostic biomarker.
Increased tumor expression of UGT2B28 was associated with aggressive prostate cancer features, including higher Gleason scores, nodal invasion, and increased risk of disease progression [171]. Overexpression of the enzyme correlated with elevated circulating testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels, whereas patients lacking UGT2B28 gene copies showed reduced androgen and androgen–glucuronide levels with increased androstenedione [171]. These findings suggest that UGT2B28 plays an important role in steroid metabolism, hormone homeostasis, and prostate cancer progression.

7. Non-Canonical Functions Independent of Metabolic Roles

The upregulation of UGT2B17 in therapy-resistant prostate cancer has paved the way for exploring non-canonical functions. UGT2B17 interacts with proteins involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR), thereby allowing PCa cells to withstand endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [172]. In addition, UGT2B17 influences transcriptional programs linked to mitosis and the DNA damage response (DDR), mainly via Src kinase signaling. Through this pathway, it suppresses the activity of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinases, allowing cells to bypass the G2/M checkpoint and thereby accelerating cell proliferation [172]. These observations indicate that although androgen signaling inhibition upregulates UGT2B17 and reduces androgen dependence in PCa cells, UGT2B17 also performs androgen-independent metabolic roles that enhance tumor cell survival and growth, ultimately contributing to the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
In Laron syndrome, where IGF1 signaling is reduced and cancer incidence is low, UGT2B15 is markedly upregulated, suggesting that it may participate in pathways of reduced cellular stress and enhanced clearance capacity. In the same context, UGT2B15 has been linked to p53-associated cellular defense pathways, with higher expression observed in p53 wild-type [173]. Similarly, high expression of UGT2B17 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is linked with poor survival and reduced drug response [174]. UGT2B17 is shown to interact with multiple kinases within the BCR signaling pathway, including ZAP70, SYK, and BTK, suggesting a potential therapeutic vulnerability. Notably, the dual SYK and JAK/STAT6 inhibitor cerdulatinib is more effective than the selective BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in suppressing the proliferation driven by UGT2B17 [174]. There is evidence for alternate splicing isoforms of UGT2B7 involvement in cellular processes. Functional studies on the UGT2B7_i8 variant showed that alternative isoforms extend beyond traditional roles, influencing global cell metabolism [175]. The UGT2B7_i8 isoforms play a role within a core metabolic network, suggesting a connection between the glucuronidation pathway and primary cellular metabolic processes such as amino acid and nucleotide metabolism [175]. It remains to be clarified whether this link involves protein interactions (e.g., dimerization/oligomerization) or the glucuronidation of novel endogenous substrates. Additionally, UGT2B7_i8 expression has also been shown to influence cell adhesion and proliferation, reinforcing the idea that UGT enzymes play broader roles in regulating multiple cellular functions beyond detoxification [175].

8. Future Directions

UGT2B family members play a significant role in the metabolism of endogenous substrates, and drugs, whose function in turn is affected by drugs and endogenous substances. Future research must focus on the tissue-specific distribution and non-canonical roles of these highly expressed enzymes in addition to their metabolic role. Furthermore, exploiting drug–drug interactions mediated by UGT2B members to improve the efficacy of the substrates must be undertaken. The compensatory role of other UGT2B members in the absence of closest members and dual protein–protein interactions of UGT2B members may also shed light on how we can exploit their metabolic role and tissue-specific interactions for improved efficacy and reduced toxicities in oncology setting.
UGT2B17 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in pediatric cancer treatment due to its involvement in oncogenic signaling pathways and drug resistance. UGT2B17 has a non-canonical role as part of the BCR signalosome, interacting with kinases such as ZAP70, SYK, and BTK. These interactions enhance prosurvival and proliferative signaling in leukemic cells. Dual inhibition of SYK and JAK/STAT6 pathways using agents like cerdulatinib has shown promise in overcoming the proproliferative effects of UGT2B17. This approach is more effective compared to selective BTK inhibitors like ibrutinib, which fail to fully abrogate UGT2B17-mediated proliferation [174]. UGT2B17 is also connected to IL4 cytokine signaling, which contributes to its oncogenic functions. Targeting the JAK/STAT6 pathway could disrupt this signaling axis, reducing the survival advantage conferred by UGT2B17 overexpression [155].
High expression of UGT2B17 correlates with poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy in certain cancers like chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Epigenetic therapies or gene editing approaches could be employed to downregulate UGT2B17 expression or disrupt its transcriptional regulation, potentially improving treatment outcomes [155]. Since UGT2B17 enhances resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, combining standard chemotherapy with inhibitors targeting UGT2B17-mediated pathways (e.g., SYK/JAK or BCR signaling) may improve efficacy. For example, combining cerdulatinib with conventional therapies could sensitize resistant cancer cells to treatment [176].
The expression level of UGT2B17 can serve as a biomarker for identifying patients at higher risk of poor outcomes or those less likely to respond to specific treatments. Stratifying patients based on UGT2B17 expression could guide personalized treatment plans, optimizing therapeutic choices.
In summary, therapeutic strategies targeting UGT2B17 focus on disrupting its role in oncogenic signaling pathways (e.g., BCR and JAK/STAT6), modulating its expression, and integrating it into combination therapies. These approaches hold the potential for improving outcomes in pediatric cancers where UGT2B17 plays a critical role.

9. Conclusions

The evidence discussed in this review reinforces the importance of the UGT2B enzyme family in cancer biology and treatment, particularly in hormone-driven malignancies and cancers in which drug metabolism strongly influences therapeutic response. Across different cancer types, genetic variation, tissue-specific expression, and complex regulatory mechanisms, including epigenetic and microRNA-mediated control, shape both disease risk and treatment outcomes. While UGT2B enzymes are best known for their role in the glucuronidation of endogenous compounds and anticancer drugs, accumulating data indicate that certain isoforms, such as UGT2B17, may also contribute to oncogenic signaling and treatment resistance in a context-dependent manner. This dual metabolic and functional relevance has clear translational implications. From a therapeutic perspective, targeting UGT2B activity should not be viewed in isolation, but rather as part of rational combination strategies. Selective inhibition or modulation of UGT2B family members may enhance the effectiveness of co-administered anticancer agents without increasing their dose, while simultaneously allowing the dose reduction in drugs associated with dose-dependent toxicities. Taken together, these observations place UGT2B enzymes as clinically relevant modifiers of cancer treatment and support their further evaluation as biomarkers and therapeutic targets within precision oncology frameworks.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph19071016/s1; Figure S1: UGT2B family members’ genetic variations across various cancers. A minimum of 100 patients were considered as an inclusion criterion for obtaining frequency data. Various cohorts and their original sources of the data can be seen on the plots, and can also be obtained from the cBioPortal webpage. (A) UGT2B17 variations across cancer types; (B) UGT2B15 variations across cancer types (minimum 100 patients per cancer type); (C) UGT2B7 variations across cancer types (minimum 100 patients per cancer type); (D) UGT2B10 variations across cancer types (minimum 100 patients per cancer type) [177]; Table S1: Cooccurrence tendencies of variants in UGT2B family members across the datasets investigated in cBioPortal; Table S2: A comparison of allele frequencies in UGT2B family genes in various populations. The data presented are not comprehensive and are only meant to indicate the population variations seen [104,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.S.U.; methodology, S.K.S. and C.R.S.U.; software, S.K.S.; validation, V.P.S., T.H.M.H. and B.T.G.; resources, G.V.B. and A.K.; data curation, S.K.S. and C.R.S.U.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.S. and G.V.B.; writing—review and editing, V.P.S., T.H.M.H., B.T.G., A.K. and C.R.S.U.; visualization, S.K.S.; supervision, C.R.S.U.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge the support, guidance, and encouragement of the RAKMHSU administration throughout the preparation of this review. Microsoft Copilot was used to improve the manuscript language and simplify certain complex sentences. All content was reviewed and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rowland, A.; Miners, J.O.; Mackenzie, P.I. The UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases: Their Role in Drug Metabolism and Detoxification. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guillemette, C.; Lévesque, É.; Rouleau, M. Pharmacogenomics of Human Uridine Diphospho-Glucuronosyltransferases and Clinical Implications. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 96, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allain, E.P.; Rouleau, M.; Lévesque, E.; Guillemette, C. Emerging Roles for UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases in Drug Resistance and Cancer Progression. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 122, 1277–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Turgeon, D.; Carrier, J.S.; Lévesque, E.; Hum, D.W.; Bélanger, A. Relative Enzymatic Activity, Protein Stability, and Tissue Distribution of Human Steroid-Metabolizing UGT2B Subfamily Members. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ohno, S.; Nakajin, S. Determination of mRNA Expression of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Application for Localization in Various Human Tissues by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2009, 37, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Barbier, O.; Lapointe, H.; El Alfy, M.; Hum, D.W.; Bélanger, A. Cellular Localization of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in the Human Prostate by in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 4819–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chouinard, S.; Pelletier, G.; Bélanger, A.; Barbier, O. Cellular Specific Expression of the Androgen-Conjugating Enzymes UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 in the Human Prostate Epithelium. Endocr. Res. 2004, 30, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bélanger, A.; Hum, D.W.; Beaulieu, M.; Lévesque, E.; Guillemette, C.; Tchernof, A.; Bélanger, G.; Turgeon, D.; Dubois, S. Characterization and Regulation of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases in Steroid Target Tissues. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1998, 65, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhou, L.; Montalvo, A.D.; Collins, J.M.; Wang, D. Quantitative Analysis of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase Transcriptome in Human Tissues. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2023, 11, e01154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wassenaar, C.A.; Conti, D.V.; Das, S.; Chen, P.; Cook, E.H.; Ratain, M.J.; Benowitz, N.L.; Tyndale, R.F. UGT1A and UGT2B Genetic Variation Alters Nicotine and Nitrosamine Glucuronidation in European and African American Smokers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2015, 24, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lévesque, E.; Ménard, V.; Laverdière, I.; Bellemare, J.; Barbier, O.; Girard, H.; Guillemette, C. Extensive Splicing of Transcripts Encoding the Bile Acid-Conjugating Enzyme UGT2B4 Modulates Glucuronidation. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2010, 20, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, D.G.; Marri, S.; Hulin, J.-A.; McKinnon, R.A.; Mackenzie, P.I.; Meech, R. The Somatic Mutation Landscape of UDP-Glycosyltransferase (UGT) Genes in Human Cancers. Cancers 2022, 14, 5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, X.; Li, D.; Wang, N.; Yang, M.; Liao, A.; Wang, S.; Hu, G.; Zeng, B.; Yao, Y.; Liu, D.; et al. Bioinformatic Analysis Suggests That UGT2B15 Activates the Hippo-YAP Signaling Pathway Leading to the Pathogenesis of Gastric Cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 1855–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, C.; Southard, C.; Huo, D.; Hernandez, R.D.; Witonsky, D.B.; Olopade, O.I.; Di Rienzo, A. SNP Discovery, Expression and Cis-Regulatory Variation in the UGT2B Genes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012, 12, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hu, L.; Wu, Y.; Guan, X.; Liang, Y.; Yao, X.; Tan, D.; Bai, Y.; Xiong, G.; Yang, K. Germline Copy Number Loss of UGT2B28 and Gain of PLEC Contribute to Increased Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk in Southwest China. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 3056–3071. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Iyer, L.; Hall, D.; Das, S.; Mortell, M.A.; Ramírez, J.; Kim, S.; Di Rienzo, A.; Ratain, M.J. Phenotype-Genotype Correlation of in Vitro SN-38 (Active Metabolite of Irinotecan) and Bilirubin Glucuronidation in Human Liver Tissue with UGT1A1 Promoter Polymorphism. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 65, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ando, Y.; Saka, H.; Ando, M.; Sawa, T.; Muro, K.; Ueoka, H.; Yokoyama, A.; Saitoh, S.; Shimokata, K.; Hasegawa, Y. Polymorphisms of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Gene and Irinotecan Toxicity: A Pharmacogenetic Analysis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 6921–6926. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Lazarus, P.; Sun, D. Potential Role of UGT Pharmacogenetics in Cancer Treatment and Prevention: Focus on Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors. Drug Metab. Rev. 2010, 42, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dellinger, R.W.; Matundan, H.H.; Ahmed, A.S.; Duong, P.H.; Meyskens, F.L.M. Anti-Cancer Drugs Elicit Re-Expression of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases in Melanoma Cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, R.; Lu, Y.; Huang, P. The Uridine Diphosphate (UDP)-Glycosyltransferases (UGTs) Superfamily: The Role in Tumor Cell Metabolism. Front. Oncol. 2023, 12, 1088458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Riedy, M.; Wang, J.Y.; Miller, A.P.; Buckler, A.; Hall, J.; Guida, M. Genomic Organization of the UGT2b Gene Cluster on Human Chromosome 4q13. Pharmacogenetics 2000, 10, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Turgeon, D.; Carrier, J.S.; Lévesque, E.; Beatty, B.G.; Bélanger, A.; Hum, D.W. Isolation and Characterization of the Human UGT2B15 Gene, Localized within a Cluster of UGT2B Genes and Pseudogenes on Chromosome 4. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hanioka, N.; Naito, T.; Narimatsu, S. Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Isoforms Involved in Bisphenol A Glucuronidation. Chemosphere 2008, 74, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bowalgaha, K.; Elliot, D.J.; Mackenzie, P.I.; Knights, K.M.; Miners, J.O. The Glucuronidation of Delta4-3-Keto C19- and C21-Hydroxysteroids by Human Liver Microsomal and Recombinant UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs): 6alpha- and 21-Hydroxyprogesterone Are Selective Substrates for UGT2B7. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2007, 35, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Robin, S.; Hassine, K.B.; Muthukumaran, J.; Jurkovic Mlakar, S.; Krajinovic, M.; Nava, T.; Uppugunduri, C.R.S.; Ansari, M. A Potential Implication of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B10 in the Detoxification of Drugs Used in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Setting: An in Silico Investigation. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ahire, D.; Mariasoosai, C.; Naji-Talakar, S.; Natesan, S.; Prasad, B. Promiscuity and Quantitative Contribution of UGT2B17 in Drug and Steroid Metabolism Determined by Experimental and Computational Approaches. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, 64, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Precht, J.C.; Schroth, W.; Klein, K.; Brauch, H.; Krynetskiy, E.; Schwab, M.; Mürdter, T.E. The Letrozole Phase 1 Metabolite Carbinol as a Novel Probe Drug for UGT2B7. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2013, 41, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ohno, A.; Saito, Y.; Hanioka, N.; Jinno, H.; Saeki, M.; Ando, M.; Ozawa, S.; Sawada, J. Involvement of Human Hepatic UGT1A1, UGT2B4, and UGT2B7 in the Glucuronidation of Carvedilol. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2004, 32, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kahma, H.; Filppula, A.M.; Neuvonen, M.; Tarkiainen, E.K.; Tornio, A.; Holmberg, M.T.; Itkonen, M.K.; Finel, M.; Neuvonen, P.J.; Niemi, M.; et al. Clopidogrel Carboxylic Acid Glucuronidation Is Mediated Mainly by UGT2B7, UGT2B4, and UGT2B17: Implications for Pharmacogenetics and Drug-Drug Interactions. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2018, 46, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hanioka, N.; Hayashi, K.; Shimizudani, T.; Nagaoka, K.; Koeda, A.; Naito, S.; Narimatsu, S. Stereoselective Glucuronidation of Propranolol in Human and Cynomolgus Monkey Liver Microsomes: Role of Human Hepatic UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Isoforms, UGT1A9, UGT2B4 and UGT2B7. Pharmacology 2008, 82, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Barbier, O.; Duran-Sandoval, D.; Pineda-Torra, I.; Kosykh, V.; Fruchart, J.-C.; Staels, B. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Induces Hepatic Expression of the Human Bile Acid Glucuronidating UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 Enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 32852–32860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lapham, K.; Ferguson, N.; Niosi, M.; Goosen, T.C. Clotrimazole Identified as a Selective UGT2B4 Inhibitor Using Canagliflozin-2′-O-Glucuronide Formation as a Selective UGT2B4 Probe Reaction. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2024, 52, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pillot, T.; Ouzzine, M.; Fournel-Gigleux, S.; Lafaurie, C.; Radominska, A.; Burchell, B.; Siest, G.; Magdalou, J. Glucuronidation of Hyodeoxycholic Acid in Human Liver. Evidence for a Selective Role of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B4. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 25636–25642. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Gelston, E.A.; Coller, J.K.; Lopatko, O.V.; James, H.M.; Schmidt, H.; White, J.M.; Somogyi, A.A. Methadone Inhibits CYP2D6 and UGT2B7/2B4 in Vivo: A Study Using Codeine in Methadone- and Buprenorphine-Maintained Subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 73, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Court, M.H.; Krishnaswamy, S.; Hao, Q.; Duan, S.X.; Patten, C.J.; Von Moltke, L.L.; Greenblatt, D.J. Evaluation of 3′-Azido-3′-Deoxythymidine, Morphine, and Codeine as Probe Substrates for UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) in Human Liver Microsomes: Specificity and Influence of the UGT2B7*2 Polymorphism. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2003, 31, 1125–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, D.; Sharma, A.K.; Dellinger, R.W.; Blevins-Primeau, A.S.; Balliet, R.M.; Chen, G.; Boyiri, T.; Amin, S.; Lazarus, P. Glucuronidation of Active Tamoxifen Metabolites by the Human UDP Glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2007, 35, 2006–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bae, S.K.; Jeong, Y.-J.; Lee, C.; Liu, K.-H. Identification of Human UGT Isoforms Responsible for Glucuronidation of Efavirenz and Its Three Hydroxy Metabolites. Xenobiotica Fate Foreign Compd. Biol. Syst. 2011, 41, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Court, M.H.; Duan, S.X.; Guillemette, C.; Journault, K.; Krishnaswamy, S.; Von Moltke, L.L.; Greenblatt, D.J. Stereoselective Conjugation of Oxazepam by Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs): S-Oxazepam Is Glucuronidated by UGT2B15, While R-Oxazepam Is Glucuronidated by UGT2B7 and UGT1A9. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2002, 30, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cheng, Z.; Rios, G.R.; King, C.D.; Coffman, B.L.; Green, M.D.; Mojarrabi, B.; Mackenzie, P.I.; Tephly, T.R. Glucuronidation of Catechol Estrogens by Expressed Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) 1A1, 1A3, and 2B7. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol. 1998, 45, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Coffman, B.L.; Rios, G.R.; King, C.D.; Tephly, T.R. Human UGT2B7 Catalyzes Morphine Glucuronidation. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 1997, 25, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Petrenaite, V.; Öhman, I.; Jantzen, F.P.T.; Ekström, L. Effect of UGT1A4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, UGT2B17 and ABC1B Polymorphisms on Lamotrigine Metabolism in Danish Patients. Epilepsy Res. 2022, 182, 106897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Barbier, O.; Turgeon, D.; Girard, C.; Green, M.D.; Tephly, T.R.; Hum, D.W.; Bélanger, A. 3′-Azido-3′-Deoxythimidine (AZT) Is Glucuronidated by Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2000, 28, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Innocenti, F.; Iyer, L.; Ramírez, J.; Green, M.D.; Ratain, M.J. Epirubicin Glucuronidation Is Catalyzed by Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2001, 29, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, M.; LeDuc, B.; Kerr, S.; Howe, D.; Williams, D.A. Identification of Human UGT2B7 as the Major Isoform Involved in the O-Glucuronidation of Chloramphenicol. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2010, 38, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Coates, S.; Bardhi, K.; Zhao, M.; Lazarus, P. UGT2B7-Mediated Drug–Drug Interaction between Cannabinoids and Hydromorphone. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2025, 53, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bardhi, K.; Coates, S.; Chen, G.; Lazarus, P. Cannabinoid-Induced Stereoselective Inhibition of R-S-Oxazepam Glucuronidation: Cannabinoid-Oxazepam Drug Interactions. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ji, J.-Z.; Huang, B.-B.; Gu, T.-T.; Tai, T.; Zhou, H.; Jia, Y.-M.; Mi, Q.-Y.; Zhang, M.-R.; Xie, H.-G. Human UGT2B7 Is the Major Isoform Responsible for the Glucuronidation of Clopidogrel Carboxylate. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2018, 39, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yu, H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kang, H.E. Dexamethasone-Mediated Regulation of CYP3A4 and UGTs in Human Hepatoma HuH-7 Cells. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2026, 40, e70089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhai, X.-F.; Wang, Z.; Fu, X.-J.; Fan, J.-J.; Yi, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhao, J.-Q.; Jin, C.-Y. Rational Design of an Isoform-Specific Fluorogenic Probe for Human UGT2B7: Enabling Functional Analysis and Inhibitor Screening. Anal. Chem. 2026, 98, 13056–13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yin, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lv, X.; Jiang, L.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y. Inhibition of Four Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors on the Activity of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2026, 39, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Loisios-Konstantinidis, I.; Huth, F.; Hoch, M.; Einolf, H.J. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations in Lieu of Clinical Pharmacology Studies to Support the New Drug Application of Asciminib. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Du, Z.; Wang, G.; Cao, Y.-F.; Hu, C.-M.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Zhang, C.-Z.; Zhang, W.-H.; Zhu, Z.-T.; Sun, H.-Z.; et al. Everolimus-Inhibited Multiple Isoforms of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). Xenobiotica Fate Foreign Compd. Biol. Syst. 2018, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, F.; Wang, S.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Yang, K.; Chen, Y.; Fang, Z.-Z. Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) by Bromophenols (BPs). Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Coates, S.; Bardhi, K.; Prasad, B.; Lazarus, P. Evaluation of the Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Cannabidiol Against UGT2B7-Mediated Morphine Metabolism Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, T.; Lv, Y.; Cui, Y.; Liu, D.; Xu, T.; Lu, B.; Yang, X. Properties of Dietary Flavone Glycosides, Aglycones, and Metabolites on the Catalysis of Human Endoplasmic Reticulum Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). Nutrients 2023, 15, 4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vourvahis, M.; Davis, J.; Wang, R.; Layton, G.; Choo, H.W.; Chong, C.-L.; Tawadrous, M. Effect of Rifampin and Rifabutin on the Pharmacokinetics of Lersivirine and Effect of Lersivirine on the Pharmacokinetics of Rifabutin and 25-O-Desacetyl-Rifabutin in Healthy Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4303–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gall, W.E.; Zawada, G.; Mojarrabi, B.; Tephly, T.R.; Green, M.D.; Coffman, B.L.; Mackenzie, P.I.; Radominska-Pandya, A. Differential Glucuronidation of Bile Acids, Androgens and Estrogens by Human UGT1A3 and 2B7. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 70, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mackenzie, P.; Little, J.M.; Radominska-Pandya, A. Glucosidation of Hyodeoxycholic Acid by UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 65, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kruger, B.; Chimusa, E.; Abera, A.; Singh, J.; Shamley, D.; Dandara, C. SULT and UGT Genetic Variants Modulate Side Effect Profiles in South African Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen. Genes 2026, 17, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhou, D.; Guo, J.; Linnenbach, A.J.; Booth-Genthe, C.L.; Grimm, S.W. Role of Human UGT2B10 in N-Glucuronidation of Tricyclic Antidepressants, Amitriptyline, Imipramine, Clomipramine, and Trimipramine. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2010, 38, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kaivosaari, S.; Toivonen, P.; Aitio, O.; Sipilä, J.; Koskinen, M.; Salonen, J.S.; Finel, M. Regio- and Stereospecific N-Glucuronidation of Medetomidine: The Differences between UDP Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4 and UGT2B10 Account for the Complex Kinetics of Human Liver Microsomes. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2008, 36, 1529–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pardiñas, A.F.; Nalmpanti, M.; Pocklington, A.J.; Legge, S.E.; Medway, C.; King, A.; Jansen, J.; Helthuis, M.; Zammit, S.; MacCabe, J.; et al. Pharmacogenomic Variants and Drug Interactions Identified Through the Genetic Analysis of Clozapine Metabolism. Am. J. Psychiatry 2019, 176, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Erickson-Ridout, K.K.; Zhu, J.; Lazarus, P. Olanzapine Metabolism and the Significance of UGT1A448V and UGT2B1067Y Variants. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2011, 21, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Guan, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Wang, X.; Bai, X.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, Y.; Wei, W.; Huang, M.; et al. Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacokinetic Factors for Dexmedetomidine-Associated Hemodynamic Instability in Pediatric Patients. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1515523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bennani, Y.; Ben Hassine, K.; Gencaslan, M.; Boudal-Khoshbeen, M.; Samer, C.; Ansari, M.; Daali, Y.; Satyanarayana Uppugunduri, C.R. In Vitro Screening of UGT2B10 in Silico Prioritized Putative Ligands from Drugs Used in the Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Setting. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2024, 12, e70011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pattanawongsa, A.; Nair, P.C.; Rowland, A.; Miners, J.O. Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B10: Validation of Cotinine as a Selective Probe Substrate, Inhibition by UGT Enzyme-Selective Inhibitors and Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Drugs, and Structural Determinants of Enzyme Inhibition. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2016, 44, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hanioka, N.; Nonaka, Y.; Saito, K.; Negishi, T.; Okamoto, K.; Kataoka, H.; Narimatsu, S. Effect of Aflatoxin B1 on UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase mRNA Expression in HepG2 Cells. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 526–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Grant, D.J.; Chen, Z.; Howard, L.E.; Wiggins, E.; De Hoedt, A.; Vidal, A.C.; Carney, S.T.; Squires, J.; Magyar, C.E.; Huang, J.; et al. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Progression. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, Y.; Ramírez, J.; Ratain, M.J. Inhibition of Paracetamol Glucuronidation by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011, 71, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nakajima, M.; Yamanaka, H.; Fujiwara, R.; Katoh, M.; Yokoi, T. Stereoselective Glucuronidation of 5-(4′-Hydroxyphenyl)-5-Phenylhydantoin by Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, UGT1A9, and UGT2B15: Effects of UGT-UGT Interactions. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2007, 35, 1679–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chung, J.-Y.; Cho, J.-Y.; Yu, K.-S.; Kim, J.-R.; Jung, H.-R.; Lim, K.-S.; Jang, I.-J.; Shin, S.-G. Effect of the UGT2B15 Genotype on the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Interactions of Intravenous Lorazepam in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 77, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Park, J.-W.; Kim, J.-M.; Bang, Y.Y.; Kim, K.-A.; Yu, S.; Park, J.-Y. UGT2B15 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Reduces Dabigatran Acylglucuronide Formation in Humans. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 15, 1507915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. He, X.; Hesse, L.M.; Hazarika, S.; Masse, G.; Harmatz, J.S.; Greenblatt, D.J.; Court, M.H. Evidence for Oxazepam as an in Vivo Probe of UGT2B15: Oxazepam Clearance Is Reduced by UGT2B15 D85Y Polymorphism but Unaffected by UGT2B17 Deletion. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2009, 68, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yin, H.; Wang, Z.; Lv, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fan, W.; Li, S.; Jiang, L.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y. Inhibition of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzyme by Entrectinib: Implications for Drug-Drug Interactions. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2024, 395, 111023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lv, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yin, H.; Xia, Y.; Jiang, L.; Liu, Y. Drug-Drug Interaction Potentials of Tucatinib Inhibition of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2023, 381, 110574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, Z.; Lv, X.; Yin, H.; Jiang, L.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qv, C.; Liu, Y. Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases by Fedratinib, Implying a High Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2026, 430, 111994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, Z.; Lv, X.; Yin, H.; Jiang, L.; Li, W.; Liu, Y. High Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions Caused by Pexidartinib via UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases Inhibition. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2026, 39, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kaeding, J.; Bélanger, J.; Caron, P.; Verreault, M.; Bélanger, A.; Barbier, O. Calcitrol (1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3) Inhibits Androgen Glucuronidation in Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kang, S.P.; Ramirez, J.; House, L.; Zhang, W.; Mirkov, S.; Liu, W.; Haverfield, E.; Ratain, M.J. A Pharmacogenetic Study of Vorinostat Glucuronidation. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2010, 20, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wong, N.-S.; Seah, E.Z.; Wang, L.-Z.; Yeo, W.-L.; Yap, H.-L.; Chuah, B.; Lim, Y.-W.; Ang, P.C.; Tai, B.-C.; Lim, R.; et al. Impact of UDP-Gluconoryltransferase 2B17 Genotype on Vorinostat Metabolism and Clinical Outcomes in Asian Women with Breast Cancer. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2011, 21, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sun, D.; Chen, G.; Dellinger, R.W.; Sharma, A.K.; Lazarus, P. Characterization of 17-Dihydroexemestane Glucuronidation: Potential Role of the UGT2B17 Deletion in Exemestane Pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2010, 20, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ahire, D.; Heyward, S.; Prasad, B. Intestinal Metabolism of Diclofenac by Polymorphic UGT2B17 Correlates with Its Highly Variable Pharmacokinetics and Safety across Populations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 114, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Allain, E.P.; Rouleau, M.; Vanura, K.; Tremblay, S.; Vaillancourt, J.; Bat, V.; Caron, P.; Villeneuve, L.; Labriet, A.; Turcotte, V.; et al. UGT2B17 Modifies Drug Response in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, N.; Liu, Y.; Jeong, H. Drug-Drug Interaction Potentials of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors via Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bachhav, N.; Singh, D.K.; Shaffer, G.; Amory, J.K.; Prasad, B. Curcumin Enhances the Oral Bioavailability of Testosterone by Inhibiting Its Intestinal Metabolism. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2025, 53, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Salhab, H.; Naughton, D.P.; Barker, J. Potential Assessment of UGT2B17 Inhibition by Salicylic Acid in Human Supersomes In Vitro. Molecules 2021, 26, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chanawong, A.; Mackenzie, P.I.; McKinnon, R.A.; Hu, D.G.; Meech, R. Exemestane and Its Active Metabolite 17-Hydroexemestane Induce UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B17 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 361, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Oda, S.; Fujiwara, R.; Kutsuno, Y.; Fukami, T.; Itoh, T.; Yokoi, T.; Nakajima, M. Targeted Screen for Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases Inhibitors and the Evaluation of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions with Zafirlukast. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2015, 43, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Barbier, O.; Torra, I.P.; Sirvent, A.; Claudel, T.; Blanquart, C.; Duran-Sandoval, D.; Kuipers, F.; Kosykh, V.; Fruchart, J.-C.; Staels, B. FXR Induces the UGT2B4 Enzyme in Hepatocytes: A Potential Mechanism of Negative Feedback Control of FXR Activity. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1926–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Qin, G.-Q.; Jia, R.-Y.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, D.; Fang, Z.-Z. Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Hydroxy-PAHs (OH-PAHs). Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhan, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Cai, Y.; Huang, J.; Wu, D.; Huang, B.; Wu, B.; Liu, X. Naftopidil Enantiomers Suppress Androgen Accumulation and Induce Cell Apoptosis via the UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 in Benign Prostate Hyperplasia. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2022, 221, 106117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhu, L.; Lv, H.; Xiao, L.; Hou, Y.; Li, W.; Ge, G.; Ai, C. Diverse Effects of α-/β-Estradiol on Catalytic Activities of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2023, 225, 106196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Guillemette, C.; Lévesque, E.; Harvey, M.; Bellemare, J.; Menard, V. UGT Genomic Diversity: Beyond Gene Duplication. Drug Metab. Rev. 2010, 42, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Neumann, E.; Mehboob, H.; Ramírez, J.; Mirkov, S.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W. Age-Dependent Hepatic UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Gene Expression and Activity in Children. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, H.; Bastian, J.R.; Zhao, W.; Chen, H.; Shaik, I.H.; Chaphekar, N.; Caritis, S.N.; Venkataramanan, R. Pregnancy Alters CYP- and UGT-Mediated Metabolism of Buprenorphine. Ther. Drug Monit. 2020, 42, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Schulze, J.J.; Lorentzon, M.; Ohlsson, C.; Lundmark, J.; Roh, H.-K.; Rane, A.; Ekström, L. Genetic Aspects of Epitestosterone Formation and Androgen Disposition: Influence of Polymorphisms in CYP17 and UGT2B Enzymes. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2008, 18, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lampe, J.W.; Bigler, J.; Bush, A.C.; Potter, J.D. Prevalence of Polymorphisms in the Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B Family: UGT2B4(D458E), UGT2B7(H268Y), and UGT2B15(D85Y). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2000, 9, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Xie, W. Xenobiotic Nuclear Receptor-Mediated Regulation of UDP-Glucuronosyl-Transferases. Curr. Drug Metab. 2005, 6, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Labriet, A.; Allain, E.P.; Rouleau, M.; Audet-Delage, Y.; Villeneuve, L.; Guillemette, C. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of UGT2B10 Hepatic Expression and Activity by Alternative Splicing. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2018, 46, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. MacLeod, S.L.; Nowell, S.; Plaxco, J.; Lang, N.P. An Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Method for the Determination of the D85Y Polymorphism in the Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 Gene in a Case-Control Study of Prostate Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2000, 7, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hajdinjak, T.; Zagradisnik, B. Prostate Cancer and Polymorphism D85Y in Gene for Dihydrotestosterone Degrading Enzyme UGT2B15: Frequency of DD Homozygotes Increases with Gleason Score. Prostate 2004, 59, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Park, J.; Chen, L.; Shade, K.; Lazarus, P.; Seigne, J.; Patterson, S.; Helal, M.; Pow-Sang, J. Asp85tyr Polymorphism in the Udp-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B15 Gene and the Risk of Prostate Cancer. J. Urol. 2004, 171, 2484–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Okugi, H.; Nakazato, H.; Matsui, H.; Ohtake, N.; Nakata, S.; Suzuki, K. Association of the Polymorphisms of Genes Involved in Androgen Metabolism and Signaling Pathways with Familial Prostate Cancer Risk in a Japanese Population. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2006, 30, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Park, J.; Chen, L.; Ratnashinge, L.; Sellers, T.A.; Tanner, J.-P.; Lee, J.-H.; Dossett, N.; Lang, N.; Kadlubar, F.F.; Ambrosone, C.B.; et al. Deletion Polymorphism of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 and Risk of Prostate Cancer in African American and Caucasian Men. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2006, 15, 1473–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Karypidis, A.-H.; Olsson, M.; Andersson, S.-O.; Rane, A.; Ekström, L. Deletion Polymorphism of the UGT2B17 Gene Is Associated with Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer and Correlated to Gene Expression in the Prostate. Pharmacogenomics J. 2008, 8, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Park, J.Y.; Tanner, J.-P.; Sellers, T.A.; Huang, Y.; Stevens, C.K.; Dossett, N.; Shankar, R.A.; Zachariah, B.; Heysek, R.; Pow-Sang, J. Association between Polymorphisms in HSD3B1 and UGT2B17 and Prostate Cancer Risk. Urology 2007, 70, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Nadeau, G.; Bellemare, J.; Audet-Walsh, É.; Flageole, C.; Huang, S.-P.; Bao, B.-Y.; Douville, P.; Caron, P.; Fradet, Y.; Lacombe, L.; et al. Deletions of the Androgen-Metabolizing UGT2B Genes Have an Effect on Circulating Steroid Levels and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E1550–E1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Vidal, A.C.; Tucker, C.; Schildkraut, J.M.; Richardson, R.M.; McPhail, M.; Freedland, S.J.; Hoyo, C.; Grant, D.J. Novel Associations of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B Gene Variants with Prostate Cancer Risk in a Multiethnic Study. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Grant, D.J.; Hoyo, C.; Oliver, S.D.; Gerber, L.; Shuler, K.; Calloway, E.; Gaines, A.R.; McPhail, M.; Livingston, J.N.; Richardson, R.M.; et al. Association of Uridine Diphosphate-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B Gene Variants with Serum Glucuronide Levels and Prostate Cancer Risk. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2013, 17, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gsur, A.; Preyer, M.; Haidinger, G.; Schatzl, G.; Madersbacher, S.; Marberger, M.; Vutuc, C.; Micksche, M. A Polymorphism in the UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 Gene (D85Y) Is Not Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002, 11, 497–498. [Google Scholar]
  111. Olsson, M.; Lindström, S.; Häggkvist, B.; Adami, H.-O.; Bälter, K.; Stattin, P.; Ask, B.; Rane, A.; Ekström, L.; Grönberg, H. The UGT2B17 Gene Deletion Is Not Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk. Prostate 2008, 68, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Setlur, S.R.; Chen, C.X.; Hossain, R.R.; Ha, J.S.; Van Doren, V.E.; Stenzel, B.; Steiner, E.; Oldridge, D.; Kitabayashi, N.; Banerjee, S.; et al. Genetic Variation of Genes Involved in Dihydrotestosterone Metabolism and the Risk of Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gallagher, C.J.; Kadlubar, F.F.; Muscat, J.E.; Ambrosone, C.B.; Lang, N.P.; Lazarus, P. The UGT2B17 Gene Deletion Polymorphism and Risk of Prostate Cancer. A Case-Control Study in Caucasians. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2007, 31, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hu, D.G.; Gardner-Stephen, D.; Severi, G.; Gregory, P.A.; Treloar, J.; Giles, G.G.; English, D.R.; Hopper, J.L.; Tilley, W.D.; Mackenzie, P.I. A Novel Polymorphism in a Forkhead Box A1 (FOXA1) Binding Site of the Human UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 Gene Modulates Promoter Activity and Is Associated with Altered Levels of Circulating Androstane-3α,17β-Diol Glucuronide. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 78, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Habibi, M.; Mirfakhraie, R.; Khani, M.; Rakhshan, A.; Azargashb, E.; Pouresmaeili, F. Genetic Variations in UGT2B28, UGT2B17, UGT2B15 Genes and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Case-Control Study. Gene 2017, 634, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kpoghomou, M.-A.; Kalembo, F.W.; Soatiana, J.E.; Bishwajit, G.; Sheng, W. UGT2B17 Status and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Open J. Prev. Med. 2013, 3, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cai, L.; Huang, W.; Chou, K.-C. Prostate Cancer with Variants in CYP17 and UGT2B17 Genes: A Meta-Analysis. Protein Pept. Lett. 2012, 19, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sun, C.; Huo, D.; Southard, C.; Nemesure, B.; Hennis, A.; Cristina Leske, M.; Wu, S.-Y.; Witonsky, D.B.; Olopade, O.I.; Di Rienzo, A. A Signature of Balancing Selection in the Region Upstream to the Human UGT2B4 Gene and Implications for Breast Cancer Risk. Hum. Genet. 2011, 130, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. He, B.-X.; Qiao, B.; Lam, A.K.-Y.; Zhao, X.-L.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Liu, H. Association between UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 tagSNPs and Breast Cancer Risk in Chinese Females. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 45, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Al-Eitan, L.N.; Rababa’h, D.M.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Khasawneh, R.H. Association between ESR1, ESR2, HER2, UGT1A4, and UGT2B7 Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer in Jordan: A Case-Control Study. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Sparks, R.; Ulrich, C.M.; Bigler, J.; Tworoger, S.S.; Yasui, Y.; Rajan, K.B.; Porter, P.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Ballard-Barbash, R.; Yuan, X.; et al. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase and Sulfotransferase Polymorphisms, Sex Hormone Concentrations, and Tumor Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2004, 6, R488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yong, M.; Schwartz, S.M.; Atkinson, C.; Makar, K.W.; Thomas, S.S.; Newton, K.M.; Aiello Bowles, E.J.; Holt, V.L.; Leisenring, W.M.; Lampe, J.W. Associations between Polymorphisms in Glucuronidation and Sulfation Enzymes and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Haakensen, V.D.; Biong, M.; Lingjærde, O.C.; Holmen, M.M.; Frantzen, J.O.; Chen, Y.; Navjord, D.; Romundstad, L.; Lüders, T.; Bukholm, I.K.; et al. Expression Levels of Uridine 5′-Diphospho-Glucuronosyltransferase Genes in Breast Tissue from Healthy Women Are Associated with Mammographic Density. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2010, 12, R65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Eskandari-Nasab, E.; Hashemi, M.; Rezaei, H.; Fazaeli, A.; Mashhadi, M.A.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Arbabi, F.; Jahantigh, M.; Taheri, M. Evaluation of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 (UGT2B17) and Dihydrofolate Reductase (DHFR) Genes Deletion and the Expression Level of NGX6 mRNA in Breast Cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 10531–10539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Gruber, M.; Le, T.; Filipits, M.; Gsur, A.; Mannhalter, C.; Jäger, U.; Vanura, K. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 Genotype and the Risk of Lung Cancer among Austrian Caucasians. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013, 37, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Qian, Y.; Xie, L.; Li, L.; Feng, T.; Zhu, T.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Yu, H.; Qian, B. Association between Sex Hormones Regulation-Related SNP Rs12233719 and Lung Cancer Risk among Never-Smoking Chinese Women. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 1880–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lazarus, P.; Zheng, Y.; Runkle, E.A.; Muscat, J.E.; Wiener, D. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation between the Polymorphic UGT2B17 Gene Deletion and NNAL Glucuronidation Activities in Human Liver Microsomes. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2005, 15, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. McQuaid, K.R.; Laine, L.; Fennerty, M.B.; Souza, R.; Spechler, S.J. Systematic Review: The Role of Bile Acids in the Pathogenesis of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease and Related Neoplasia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 34, 146–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, Q.-M.; Yuan, L.; Qi, Y.-J.; Ma, Z.-Y.; Wang, L.-D. Estrogen Analogues: Promising Target for Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in High Risk Areas. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2010, 16, HY19–HY22. [Google Scholar]
  130. Lian, X.; Baranova, A.; Ngo, J.; Yu, G.; Cao, H. UGT2B17 and miR-224 Contribute to Hormone Dependency Trends in Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20190472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Dura, P.; Salomon, J.; Te Morsche, R.H.M.; Roelofs, H.M.J.; Kristinsson, J.O.; Wobbes, T.; Witteman, B.J.M.; Tan, A.C.I.T.L.; Drenth, J.P.H.; Peters, W.H.M. High Enzyme Activity UGT1A1 or Low Activity UGT1A8 and UGT2B4 Genotypes Increase Esophageal Cancer Risk. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 1789–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Lin, G.-F.; Guo, W.-C.; Chen, J.-G.; Qin, Y.-Q.; Golka, K.; Xiang, C.-Q.; Ma, Q.-W.; Lu, D.-R.; Shen, J.-H. An Association of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 C802T (His268Tyr) Polymorphism with Bladder Cancer in Benzidine-Exposed Workers in China. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol. 2005, 85, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zimmermann, A.; Blaszkewicz, M.; Roth, G.; Seidel, T.; Dietrich, H.; Schutschkow, O.; Bolt, H.M.; Golka, K. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 C802T (His268Tyr) Polymorphism in Bladder Cancer Cases. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2008, 71, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Angstadt, A.Y.; Berg, A.; Zhu, J.; Miller, P.; Hartman, T.J.; Lesko, S.M.; Muscat, J.E.; Lazarus, P.; Gallagher, C.J. The Effect of Copy Number Variation in the Phase II Detoxification Genes UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 on Colorectal Cancer Risk. Cancer 2013, 119, 2477–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Shen, M.-L.; Xiao, A.; Yin, S.-J.; Wang, P.; Lin, X.-Q.; Yu, C.-B.; He, G.-H. Associations between UGT2B7 Polymorphisms and Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis. Gene 2019, 706, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Yoshida, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Itoda, M.; Muto, T.; Miyaguchi, K.; Mogushi, K.; Shoji, S.; Shimokawa, K.; Iida, S.; Uetake, H.; et al. Clinical Omics Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Incorporating Copy Number Aberrations and Gene Expression Data. Cancer Inform. 2010, 9, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. van der Logt, E.M.J.; te Morsche, R.H.M.; Groenendaal, N.; Roelofs, H.M.J.; de Metz, M.; van der Stappen, J.W.; Nagengast, F.M.; Peters, W.H.M. Genetic Polymorphism in UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Oncol. Res. 2009, 17, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Aschebrook-Kilfoy, B.; Neta, G.; Brenner, A.V.; Hutchinson, A.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Sturgis, E.M.; Xu, L.; Wheeler, W.; Doody, M.M.; Chanock, S.J.; et al. Common Genetic Variants in Metabolism and Detoxification Pathways and the Risk of Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2012, 19, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zhao, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lai, R.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, X. The Function of Uterine UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A8 (UGT1A8) and UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) Is Involved in Endometrial Cancer Based on Estrogen Metabolism Regulation. Horm. Athens Greece 2020, 19, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Grant, D.J.; Manichaikul, A.; Alberg, A.J.; Bandera, E.V.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.; Bondy, M.; Cote, M.L.; Funkhouser, E.; Moorman, P.G.; Peres, L.C.; et al. Evaluation of Vitamin D Biosynthesis and Pathway Target Genes Reveals UGT2A1/2 and EGFR Polymorphisms Associated with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in African American Women. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Parmar, S.; Stingl, J.C.; Huber-Wechselberger, A.; Kainz, A.; Renner, W.; Langsenlehner, U.; Krippl, P.; Brockmöller, J.; Haschke-Becher, E. Impact of UGT2B7 His268Tyr Polymorphism on the Outcome of Adjuvant Epirubicin Treatment in Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2011, 13, R57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Sun, C.; Huo, D.; Nemesure, B.; Hennis, A.; Leske, M.C.; Wu, S.-Y.; Niu, Q.; Olopade, O.I.; Di Rienzo, A. Lack of Association between Common UGT2B Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer in Populations of African Ancestry. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 2740–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Vulsteke, C.; Lambrechts, D.; Dieudonné, A.; Hatse, S.; Brouwers, B.; van Brussel, T.; Neven, P.; Belmans, A.; Schöffski, P.; Paridaens, R.; et al. Genetic Variability in the Multidrug Resistance Associated Protein-1 (ABCC1/MRP1) Predicts Hematological Toxicity in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving (Neo-)Adjuvant Chemotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (FEC). Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 1513–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Scherer, D.; Koepl, L.M.; Poole, E.M.; Balavarca, Y.; Xiao, L.; Baron, J.A.; Hsu, L.; Coghill, A.E.; Campbell, P.T.; Kleinstein, S.E.; et al. Genetic Variation in UGT Genes Modify the Associations of NSAIDs with Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Colon Cancer Family Registry. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer 2014, 53, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Angstadt, A.Y.; Hartman, T.J.; Lesko, S.M.; Muscat, J.E.; Zhu, J.; Gallagher, C.J.; Lazarus, P. The Effect of UGT1A and UGT2B Polymorphisms on Colorectal Cancer Risk: Haplotype Associations and Gene-Environment Interactions. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer 2014, 53, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ahern, T.P.; Christensen, M.; Cronin-Fenton, D.P.; Lunetta, K.L.; Søiland, H.; Gjerde, J.; Garne, J.P.; Rosenberg, C.L.; Silliman, R.A.; Sørensen, H.T.; et al. Functional Polymorphisms in UDP-Glucuronosyl Transferases and Recurrence in Tamoxifen-Treated Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2011, 20, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Sawyer, M.B.; Pituskin, E.; Damaraju, S.; Bies, R.R.; Vos, L.J.; Prado, C.M.M.; Kuzma, M.; Scarfe, A.G.; Clemons, M.; Tonkin, K.; et al. A Uridine Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Polymorphism Predicts Epirubicin Clearance and Outcomes in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 2016, 16, 139–144.e1-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Li, H.; Hu, B.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, X.; Su, X.; Zhang, X. Correlation of UGT2B7 Polymorphism with Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Yonsei Med. J. 2019, 60, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Joy, A.A.; Vos, L.J.; Pituskin, E.; Cook, S.F.; Bies, R.R.; Vlahadamis, A.; King, K.; Basi, S.K.; Meza-Junco, J.; Mackey, J.R.; et al. Uridine Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Polymorphism-Based Pharmacogenetic Dosing of Epirubicin in FEC Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 2021, 21, e584–e593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Li, J.; Luo, H.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Chen, L.-X.; Zhu, M.-Q.; Deng, Q.-T.; Zhu, D.-M.; Wang, Z.-M.; Xu, J.-F. Value of UGT2B7-161 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in Predicting the Risk of Cardiotoxicity in HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Pertuzumab Combined with Trastuzumab Therapy by PSL. Pharmacogenomics Pers. Med. 2022, 15, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ning, M.; Tao, Y.; Hu, X.; Guo, L.; Ni, J.; Hu, J.; Shen, H.; Chen, Y. Roles of UGT2B7 C802T Gene Polymorphism on the Efficacy of Morphine Treatment on Cancer Pain among the Chinese Han Population. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2019, 22, 1319–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Sutiman, N.; Lim, J.S.L.; Muerdter, T.E.; Singh, O.; Cheung, Y.B.; Ng, R.C.H.; Yap, Y.S.; Wong, N.S.; Ang, P.C.S.; Dent, R.; et al. Pharmacogenetics of UGT1A4, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 and Their Influence on Tamoxifen Disposition in Asian Breast Cancer Patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2016, 55, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Gil, A.; Dominguez-Cejudo, M.Á.; Molina-Pinelo, S.; Pascual, J.; Rodríguez-Alonso, B.; Rodríguez De La Borbolla, M.; Benavent Viñuales, M.; Cejuela Solís, M.; Falcon, A.; Miras, I.; et al. Unveiling the Relationship between the UGT2B Gene Family and Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, e12651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gruber, M.; Bellemare, J.; Hoermann, G.; Gleiss, A.; Porpaczy, E.; Bilban, M.; Le, T.; Zehetmayer, S.; Mannhalter, C.; Gaiger, A.; et al. Overexpression of Uridine Diphospho Glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 in High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Blood 2013, 121, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rouleau, M.; Villeneuve, L.; Allain, E.P.; McCabe-Leroux, J.; Tremblay, S.; Nguyen Van Long, F.; Uchil, A.; Joly-Beauparlant, C.; Droit, A.; Guillemette, C. Non-Canonical Transcriptional Regulation of the Poor Prognostic Factor UGT2B17 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemic and Normal B Cells. BMC Cancer 2024, 24, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Patel, Y.M.; Stram, D.O.; Wilkens, L.R.; Park, S.-S.L.; Henderson, B.E.; Le Marchand, L.; Haiman, C.A.; Murphy, S.E. The Contribution of Common Genetic Variation to Nicotine and Cotinine Glucuronidation in Multiple Ethnic/Racial Populations. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2015, 24, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Murphy, S.E.; Park, S.-S.L.; Thompson, E.F.; Wilkens, L.R.; Patel, Y.; Stram, D.O.; Le Marchand, L. Nicotine N-Glucuronidation Relative to N-Oxidation and C-Oxidation and UGT2B10 Genotype in Five Ethnic/Racial Groups. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Margaillan, G.; Lévesque, É.; Guillemette, C. Epigenetic Regulation of Steroid Inactivating UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases by microRNAs in Prostate Cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 155, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Wijayakumara, D.D.; Mackenzie, P.I.; McKinnon, R.A.; Hu, D.G.; Meech, R. Regulation of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 by miR-331-5p in Prostate Cancer Cells Involves Canonical and Noncanonical Target Sites. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2018, 365, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Jones, N.R.; Lazarus, P. UGT2B Gene Expression Analysis in Multiple Tobacco Carcinogen-Targeted Tissues. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2014, 42, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wijayakumara, D.D.; Mackenzie, P.I.; McKinnon, R.A.; Hu, D.G.; Meech, R. Regulation of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases UGT2B4 and UGT2B7 by MicroRNAs in Liver Cancer Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 361, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Dates, C.R.; Fahmi, T.; Pyrek, S.J.; Yao-Borengasser, A.; Borowa-Mazgaj, B.; Bratton, S.M.; Kadlubar, S.A.; Mackenzie, P.I.; Haun, R.S.; Radominska-Pandya, A. Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases: Effects of Altered Expression in Breast and Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015, 16, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Pâquet, S.; Fazli, L.; Grosse, L.; Verreault, M.; Têtu, B.; Rennie, P.S.; Bélanger, A.; Barbier, O. Differential Expression of the Androgen-Conjugating UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 Enzymes in Prostate Tumor Cells during Cancer Progression. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E428-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Hu, D.G.; Rogers, A.; Mackenzie, P.I. Epirubicin Upregulates UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Expression in Liver Cancer Cells via the P53 Pathway. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Wijayakumara, D.D.; Hu, D.G.; Meech, R.; McKinnon, R.A.; Mackenzie, P.I. Regulation of Human UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 by miR-376c in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015, 354, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Dluzen, D.F.; Sutliff, A.K.; Chen, G.; Watson, C.J.W.; Ishmael, F.T.; Lazarus, P. Regulation of UGT2B Expression and Activity by miR-216b-5p in Liver Cancer Cell Lines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2016, 359, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Shafiee-Kermani, F.; Carney, S.T.; Jima, D.; Utin, U.C.; Farrar, L.B.; Oputa, M.O.; Hines, M.R.; Kinyamu, H.K.; Trotter, K.W.; Archer, T.K.; et al. Expression of UDP Glucuronosyltransferases 2B15 and 2B17 Is Associated with Methylation Status in Prostate Cancer Cells. Epigenetics 2021, 16, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Ménard, V.; Lévesque, E.; Chen, S.; Eap, O.; Joy, M.S.; Ekström, L.; Rane, A.; Guillemette, C. Expression of UGT2B7 Is Driven by Two Mutually Exclusive Promoters and Alternative Splicing in Human Tissues: Changes from Prenatal Life to Adulthood and in Kidney Cancer. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2013, 23, 684–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Margaillan, G.; Rouleau, M.; Fallon, J.K.; Caron, P.; Villeneuve, L.; Turcotte, V.; Smith, P.C.; Joy, M.S.; Guillemette, C. Quantitative Profiling of Human Renal UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Glucuronidation Activity: A Comparison of Normal and Tumoral Kidney Tissues. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2015, 43, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Matsumoto, J.; Nishimoto, A.; Watari, S.; Ueki, H.; Shiromizu, S.; Iwata, N.; Takeda, T.; Ushio, S.; Kajizono, M.; Fujiyoshi, M.; et al. Significance of UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 Genetic Variants and Their mRNA Expression in the Clinical Outcome of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2023, 478, 1779–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Belledant, A.; Hovington, H.; Garcia, L.; Caron, P.; Brisson, H.; Villeneuve, L.; Simonyan, D.; Têtu, B.; Fradet, Y.; Lacombe, L.; et al. The UGT2B28 Sex-Steroid Inactivation Pathway Is a Regulator of Steroidogenesis and Modifies the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Feng, T.; Xie, N.; Gao, L.; Jia, Q.; Kung, S.H.Y.; Morova, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Fazli, L.; Lacombe, L.; et al. Noncanonical Functions of UGT2B17 Promote Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2025, 136, e196495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Sarfstein, R.; Nagaraj, K.; Parikh, S.; Levy, C.; Laron, Z.; Benayahu, D.; Werner, H. Identification of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 (UGT2B15) as a Target for IGF1 and Insulin Action. Cells 2022, 11, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Wagner, A.; Rouleau, M.; Villeneuve, L.; Le, T.; Peltier, C.; Allain, É.P.; Beaudoin, C.; Tremblay, S.; Courtier, F.; Nguyen Van Long, F.; et al. A Non-Canonical Role for the Glycosyltransferase Enzyme UGT2B17 as a Novel Constituent of the B Cell Receptor Signalosome. Cells 2023, 12, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Rouleau, M.; Tourancheau, A.; Girard-Bock, C.; Villeneuve, L.; Vaucher, J.; Duperré, A.-M.; Audet-Delage, Y.; Gilbert, I.; Popa, I.; Droit, A.; et al. Divergent Expression and Metabolic Functions of Human Glucuronosyltransferases through Alternative Splicing. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Blunt, M.D.; Koehrer, S.; Dobson, R.; Larrayoz, M.; Wilmore, S.; Hayman, A.; Parnell, J.; Smith, L.; Davies, A.; Johnson, P.W.; et al. The Dual Syk/JAK Inhibitor Cerdulatinib Antagonises B-Cell Receptor and Microenvironmental Signaling in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2313–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cerami, E.; Niehaus, A.; Gao, J.; Dogrusoz, U.; Gross , B.E.; Sumer, S.O.; Aksoy, B.A.; Jacobsen, A.; Byrne, C.J.; Heuer, M.L.; et al. The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: An Open Platform for Exploring Multidimensional Cancer Genomics Data. Cancer Discov. 2012, 2, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Ford, G.R.; Niehaus, A.; Joubert, F.; Pepper, M.S. Pharmacogenetics of CYP2A6, CYP2B6, and UGT2B7 in the Context of HIV Treatments in African Populations. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Božina, T.; Karačić, E.; Ganoci, L.; Čuković-Čavka, S.; Palić, J.; Božina, N.; Šimičević, L. UGT2B7 c.-161C>T Polymorphism Frequency in Croatian Population. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2022, 73, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Bertholim-Nasciben, L.; Scliar, M.O.; Debortoli, G.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; Scherer, S.W.; Duarte, Y.A.O.; Zatz, M.; Suarez-Kurtz, G.; Parra, E.J.; Naslavsky, M.S. Characterization of Pharmacogenomic Variants in a Brazilian Admixed Cohort of Elderly Individuals Based on Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1178715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Hwang, M.-S.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, W.-Y.; Jeong, H.-E.; Shin, J.-G. Genetic Variations in UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 in a Korean Population. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2014, 29, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Mehlotra, R.K.; Bockarie, M.J.; Zimmerman, P.A. Prevalence of UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in West African, Papua New Guinean, and North American Populations. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2007, 63, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Kim, J.Y.; Cheong, H.S.; Park, B.L.; Kim, L.H.; Namgoong, S.; Kim, J.O.; Kim, H.D.; Kim, Y.H.; Chung, M.W.; Han, S.Y.; et al. Comprehensive Variant Screening of the UGT Gene Family. Yonsei Med. J. 2014, 55, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Roco, A.; Quiñones, L.; Agúndez, J.A.G.; García-Martín, E.; Squicciarini, V.; Miranda, C.; Garay, J.; Farfán, N.; Saavedra, I.; Cáceres, D.; et al. Frequencies of 23 Functionally Significant Variant Alleles Related with Metabolism of Antineoplastic Drugs in the Chilean Population: Comparison with Caucasian and Asian Populations. Front. Genet. 2012, 3, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. John, S.; Klumsathian, S.; Own-Eium, P.; Charoenyingwattana, A.; Eu-Ahsunthornwattana, J.; Sura, T.; Dejsuphong, D.; Sritara, P.; Vathesatogkit, P.; Thongchompoo, N.; et al. Thai Pharmacogenomics Database -2 (TPGxD-2) Sequel to TPGxD-1, Analyzing Genetic Variants in 26 Non-VIPGx Genes within the Thai Population. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2024, 17, e70019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Wilson, W.; Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F.; Lyn-Cook, B.D.; Chatterjee, P.K.; Bell, T.A.; Detwiler, D.A.; Gilmore, R.C.; Valladeras, I.C.; Wright, C.C.; Threadgill, D.W.; et al. Characterization of a Common Deletion Polymorphism of the UGT2B17 Gene Linked to UGT2B15. Genomics 2004, 84, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Hwang, M.-S.; Lee, S.-J.; Jeong, H.-E.; Lee, S.; Yoo, M.-A.; Shin, J.-G. Genetic Variations in UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Gene (UGT2B7) in a Korean Population. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2010, 25, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Bhasker, C.R.; McKinnon, W.; Stone, A.; Lo, A.C.; Kubota, T.; Ishizaki, T.; Miners, J.O. Genetic Polymorphism of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) at Amino Acid 268: Ethnic Diversity of Alleles and Potential Clinical Significance. Pharmacogenetics 2000, 10, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Contrasting functional roles of UGT2B canonical and alternative isoforms in hepatocytes (A) and cancer cell (B). UGT2B (C) represents canonical uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 2B isoforms localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), responsible for the glucuronidation (G) of anticancer drugs (AC) and steroid compounds (SC) and toxicants (TX) in hepatocytes. UGT2B (Alt) indicates alternative splice isoforms, which may have reduced or no enzymatic activity, but are involved in cellular adhesion and metabolic pathways in mitochondria (MT) of cancer cells.
Figure 1. Contrasting functional roles of UGT2B canonical and alternative isoforms in hepatocytes (A) and cancer cell (B). UGT2B (C) represents canonical uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 2B isoforms localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), responsible for the glucuronidation (G) of anticancer drugs (AC) and steroid compounds (SC) and toxicants (TX) in hepatocytes. UGT2B (Alt) indicates alternative splice isoforms, which may have reduced or no enzymatic activity, but are involved in cellular adhesion and metabolic pathways in mitochondria (MT) of cancer cells.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01016 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of steroid hormone metabolism in breast and prostate tissues, highlighting the role of UGT2B enzymes in androgen and estrogen glucuronidation and elimination. Red arrows mediated by UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, UGT2B17, UGT2B28. Yellow arrows are mediated by UGT2B15, UGT2B17. Horizontal reversible arrow symbol mediated by 17β HSD. A, Aromatase (CYP19A1); COMT, Catechol-O-Methyltransferase; A-DIONE, Androstenedione; A-DIOL, Androstenediol (usually 5-androstenediol); DHEA, Dehydroepiandrosterone; 3β-HSD, 3β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase; 5α-R, 5α-Reductase (5α-hydroxysteroid reductase); T, Testosterone; DHT, Dihydrotestosterone; 3α-DIOL, 3α-Androstanediol; AST-G, Androsterone Glucuronide.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of steroid hormone metabolism in breast and prostate tissues, highlighting the role of UGT2B enzymes in androgen and estrogen glucuronidation and elimination. Red arrows mediated by UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, UGT2B17, UGT2B28. Yellow arrows are mediated by UGT2B15, UGT2B17. Horizontal reversible arrow symbol mediated by 17β HSD. A, Aromatase (CYP19A1); COMT, Catechol-O-Methyltransferase; A-DIONE, Androstenedione; A-DIOL, Androstenediol (usually 5-androstenediol); DHEA, Dehydroepiandrosterone; 3β-HSD, 3β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase; 5α-R, 5α-Reductase (5α-hydroxysteroid reductase); T, Testosterone; DHT, Dihydrotestosterone; 3α-DIOL, 3α-Androstanediol; AST-G, Androsterone Glucuronide.
Pharmaceuticals 19 01016 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Srinivasamurthy, S.K.; Samuel, V.P.; Hakim, T.H.M.; George, B.T.; Bernardt, G.V.; Kamath, A.; Uppugunduri, C.R.S. Roles of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment: A Review. Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19, 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071016

AMA Style

Srinivasamurthy SK, Samuel VP, Hakim THM, George BT, Bernardt GV, Kamath A, Uppugunduri CRS. Roles of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment: A Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2026; 19(7):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Srinivasamurthy, Suresh Kumar, Vijaya Paul Samuel, Tarig Hakim Merghani Hakim, Biji Thomas George, Grisilda Vidya Bernardt, Ashwin Kamath, and Chakradhara Rao Satyanarayana Uppugunduri. 2026. "Roles of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment: A Review" Pharmaceuticals 19, no. 7: 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071016

APA Style

Srinivasamurthy, S. K., Samuel, V. P., Hakim, T. H. M., George, B. T., Bernardt, G. V., Kamath, A., & Uppugunduri, C. R. S. (2026). Roles of Uridine Diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B Enzymes in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment: A Review. Pharmaceuticals, 19(7), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19071016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop