Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxic and Infection-Controlled Investigations of Novel Dihydropyridine Hybrids: An Efficient Synthesis and Molecular-Docking Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
(L)-Monomethyl Tyrosine (Mmt): New Synthetic Strategy via Bulky ‘Forced-Traceless’ Regioselective Pd-Catalyzed C(sp2)–H Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling the In Vitro Toxicity Profile of Psychedelic 2C Phenethylamines and Their N-Benzylphenethylamine (NBOMe) Analogues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Symmetric Thioamides: Microwave-Aided Synthesis of Terephthalic Acid Derivatives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 16
Issue 8
10.3390/ph16081157
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Magic Methyl and Its Tricks in Drug Discovery and Development

by
Pedro de Sena Murteira Pinheiro
1,†,
Lucas Silva Franco
1,2,† and
Carlos Alberto Manssour Fraga
1,2,3,*
1
Laboratório de Avaliação e Síntese de Substâncias Bioativas (LASSBio), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, RJ, Brazil
2
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Fármacos e Medicamentos (INCT-INOFAR), CCS, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, RJ, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmacologia e Química Medicinal, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, RJ, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(8), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081157
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Revised: 6 August 2023 / Accepted: 12 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methyl-Containing Pharmaceuticals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
One of the key scientific aspects of small-molecule drug discovery and development is the analysis of the relationship between its chemical structure and biological activity. Understanding the effects that lead to significant changes in biological activity is of paramount importance for the rational design and optimization of bioactive molecules. The “methylation effect”, or the “magic methyl” effect, is a factor that stands out due to the number of examples that demonstrate profound changes in either pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic properties. In many cases, this has been carried out rationally, but in others it has been the product of serendipitous observations. This paper summarizes recent examples that provide an overview of the current state of the art and contribute to a better understanding of the methylation effect in bioactive small-molecule drug candidates.

1. Introduction

The small, monovalent, and lipophilic methyl group (-CH3) is versatile and of great importance in the design or optimization of bioactive compounds, whether in terms of pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic properties [1]. Its role in drug design and hit-to-lead optimization processes is broad, including the displacement of water molecules during molecular recognition, i.e., the realization of hydrophobic interactions [2,3]; the participation in van der Waals interactions; the modulation of physicochemical properties, such as LogP and aqueous solubility [1]; and the control of the conformational properties of a given scaffold [1]. The control of the number of conformations in a given system by methylation correlates with the strategy of conformational restriction [4,5]. Other drug design strategies, such as bioisosterism [6,7,8] and homologation [9], can also benefit from methyl group insertion. During the drug discovery process, controlling conformational behavior can not only favor the adoption of a bioactive conformation, generating a potency gain for pharmacological target modulation, but can also help break to planarity and symmetry, resulting in increased aqueous solubility while increasing lipophilicity [10,11].
Other uses of the methyl group include modulating metabolic reactions by preventing their occurrence through stereoelectronic effects, by serving as a metabolic point to prevent the formation of toxic metabolites, or by modulating the metabolic profile, making molecules softer for metabolic reactions [1].
This plethora of effects mediated by the methyl group is commonly referred to as the “methyl effect”, the “methylation effect”, or even the “magic methyl” effect. It is important to mention that there are previous works that have already reviewed this topic and are published elsewhere [1,12,13,14]. The aim of this work is to provide a recent analysis of the last 10 years, with selected key examples, to highlight how the rational use of the methyl effect has evolved since the last review published by our group [1].

2. The Discovery of the Anticancer Drug Tazemetostat

Undoubtedly, one of the most important recent examples of the methylation effect in the design of new drugs is related to the discovery of tazemetostat (8). Tazemetostat (8) is a recently FDA-approved agent (2020) for the treatment of patients with epithelioid sarcoma [15]. Tazemetostat (8) acts by inhibiting enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), preventing methylation of histone 3 at lysine 27 (H3K27), and abnormal methylation of this site is found in many cancers [16,17,18].
The discovery of tazemetostat (8) started with a high-throughput screening (HTS) campaign that resulted in the identification of the small molecule hit 1, bearing the 4,6-dimethylpyridone moiety (Figure 1) [16]. Next, the structurally related parent compounds of 1 were screened for EZH2 inhibition, leading to the identification of 2. Structure–activity relationship studies were performed, allowing important analyses of the methylation effect on 3. For example, the conformational effect produced by methylation at the R1 and R2 positions of 3 was remarkable, as can be seen by comparing the methylated derivatives (5 and 6) and their unmethylated analogs (4 and 7), which presented more than a 10-fold decrease in potency. Moreover, the methylation effect at the 4,6-dimethylpyridone moiety was investigated (9), showing significant differences in potency (10–13), and the dimethylated compound 10 was the most potent. Subsequently, these important studies regarding the methylation pattern of this system resulted in the discovery of the drug tazemetostat (8) [16].

3. The Methylation Effect in Pharmacodynamic Optimization

3.1. Selective EZH2 Inhibitors

Aiming to obtain new selective EZH2 inhibitors related to tazemetostat (8), the authors of [19] first tried to perform the cyclization of compound 14 by linking the methyl and ethyl groups to form an indoline ring (15) (Figure 2). However, it was observed that this modification led to a loss in potency against the EZH2 wild-type enzyme and the EZH2 Y641F mutant. The authors suggest that the cyclization abolished the “magic methyl” effect previously reported to be key to the FDA-approved drug 8. Therefore, the authors selected the open-ring analog (14) for further structure–activity relationship (SAR) exploration, resulting in compound 16, a derivative with a second methyl group at the pyridine ring that showed selectivity over 22 other methyl transferases [19].

3.2. PI3K/mTOR Inhibitors

A series of 2-methyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolines were reported [20] based on ring bioisosterism with the 1,3-dihydro-2H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-2-one system present in the phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor and clinical candidate BEZ235 (17) [21] (Figure 3). Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is a validated strategy for cancer treatment because it is aberrantly activated in several human cancers and plays an essential role in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [22,23]. The rationale for the modification was to utilize the methyl group to preserve cell permeability and cell absorption capacity while reducing the number of polar heteroatoms (i.e., the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group of candidate 17). Hence, a series of compounds were synthesized in order to explore the potential of the 2-methyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline scaffold and to improve its drug-like profile. This study resulted in compound 18 having the best profile of kinase selectivity, cellular antiproliferative activity, western blot and immunohistochemical analyses, antitumor efficacy in vivo, and pharmacokinetic properties [20].

3.3. Selective κ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists

Tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives have been described as selective κ-opioid receptor antagonists and as compounds of interest for the treatment of several CNS disorders, such as substance abuse, depression, and anxiety [24]. Compound 19 was first discovered as a potent antagonist of this receptor [25], and subsequent SAR evaluations were performed that focused, among other modifications, on the study of the methylation pattern of the piperidine ring. The results revealed that the 4-methylated analog (20) had an 18-fold increase in the affinity for κ-opioid receptors compared to 19 [26] (Figure 4).

3.4. Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators

Modulation of the endocannabinoid system by targeting G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors has broad therapeutic applications ranging from pain to cancer treatment [27,28]. A series of oxazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidines (22) were designed via the bioisosterism strategy as new cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) modulators (Figure 5) [29]. A classical bioisosteric heterocycle replacement strategy was applied to compound 21, a CB2R agonist developed by Eli Lilly [30]. SAR studies revealed the importance of methylation at position 5 of this core when 23 was compared with the unmethylated derivative of the series (24). Compound 23 was characterized as a selective CB2R antagonist with high binding affinity in the low nanomolar range [29].
Mugnaini et al. [31] reported that 2-(1-adamantanylcarboxamido)thiophene derivatives (25–28) are selective CB2R agonists (Figure 6). The chemical starting point, compound 25, had weak activity against CB2R, and the simple addition of the methyl group (26) resulted in a 50-fold increase in the affinity. The authors remarked on the crucial role that methyl groups play in biologically active small molecules and emphasized that the effect was likely due to 26’s ability to successfully insert its methyl into the receptor binding site to establish effective hydrophobic contacts. This theory was supported by the fact that the n-propyl analog (27) obtained only a threefold increase in the affinity for CB2 receptors. These results are in stark contrast to studies suggesting that adding a methyl group to a lead molecule can result in a 10-fold increase in activity in only 8% of cases, while a 100-fold increase in potency is much less likely, occurring in 0.4% of cases [14,31].
Garai and colleagues [32] employed the magic methyl effect to increase the potency and efficacy of GAT211 (29) [33], a cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB1R) agonist-positive allosteric modulator (ago-PAM) (Figure 7). The strategic placement of a methyl group at the alpha position of the nitro functional group was hypothesized to be advantageous in terms of activity and functional selectivity, as it generated two diastereomers and an additional chiral center. Results from studies with the two diastereomers highlighted the increased potency and efficacy of erythro, (±)-30 compared to threo, (±)-31. The analysis of the separate enantiomers highlighted (−)-(S,R)-30a and (+)-(S,S)-31a as the most potent. This result represents the first example of a diastereoselective CB1R allosteric modulator interaction [32].

3.5. Histamine 1 Receptor Antagonists

To identify new fragment-like [34,35] histamine 1 receptor (H1R) antagonists, a virtual screening campaign was performed, which led to the identification of compound 32 (Figure 8) [36]. Next, 32 was used for SAR exploration and to investigate the role of the well-defined receptor binding pockets, i.e., (1) the amine binding region, (2) the upper and lower aromatic binding regions, and (3) the effect of binding site (de)solvation on H1R antagonist binding. Molecular modeling analysis combined with SAR exploration indicated the amine binding region as the primary binding hotspot, preferentially binding small tertiary amines, which is related to hydrophobic interactions. The methylation effect is clear when comparing 32 and 33, since the N-methylation strongly increased the binding affinity for H1 receptors [37].

3.6. Inhibitors of Phosphopantetheine Adenylyltransferase

In a study conducted by Novartis [38], a fragment-based screening approach [34,35] was used to identify inhibitors of phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase (PPAT) for the discovery of new antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria [38]. Fragment 34 was one of the identified hits, and hit-to-lead optimization based on C5 methylation of the imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine core resulted in 35, which had a 15-fold increase in potency (Figure 9), related to additional interactions with a hydrophobic pocket (V135, M105, and L131) of the target [38].
Moreover, another fragment hit (36) was optimized, and the methylation pattern of this hit profoundly altered its potency (Figure 10). An X-ray cocrystal of the structurally related hit 37 revealed that this triazolopyrimidinone is bound in a similar manner to 34. The bioisosteric replacement of the bromine atom of 37 by a chlorine atom (38) did not change potency significantly. Surprisingly, substitution of the benzylic position of the benzylamine with a methyl group resulted in a 30-fold activity boost, as observed for the (R)-methyl analog 39, which is probably related to hydrophobic interactions [38].

3.7. Genetic Depletion of the Mitotic Aurora Kinase B (AURKB)

AURKB is a gene encoding mitotic Aurora Kinase B that is overexpressed in some tumor cells, making it an interesting therapeutic target [39]. Huang and colleagues [40] employed a methyl group scanning strategy to enable hit-to-lead optimization (Figure 11) of compounds identified by mechanism-informed phenotypic screening [41], evaluating the genetic depletion of Aurora Kinase B (AURKB) [40]. The authors modified the benzene ring of hit 40 and synthesized ortho-, meta-, and para-methyl-substituted analogs. The para-substituted compound (41) demonstrated the best polyploidy-inducing activity, with a minimum effective concentration for polyploidy (MECP) of 0.625 μM. The authors further optimized lead 41, resulting in compound 42 (MECP = 0.019 μM). This compound displayed substantial cytotoxic activity in several cancer cell lines and promoted the loss of function in Aurora Kinase B (AURKB) phenotypes [40].

3.8. Neurokinin-3 Receptor Antagonists

The discovery of new neurokinin-3 receptor (NK3R) antagonists for the treatment of sex hormone disorders was described [42]. Starting with an HTS campaign, hit 43 was identified as an interesting starting point for optimization, but several issues such as poor solubility, microsomal stability, and off-target safety profile led to the selection of the parent compound 44 as the starting point (Figure 12). Despite being significantly less active, 44 presented improved off-target and PK profiles, making it more suitable for optimization. From the SAR analysis, it was possible to perceive the methylation effect by installing a methyl group at the 8-position of the tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine core, where (R)-46 presented increased potency, reaching the nanomolar scale. A second methylation at C6 of the terminal pyridine ring further increased potency, resulting in low nanomolar activity (48 and 49) [42].

3.9. Cereblon Ligands for Targeted Protein Degradation

With the goal of obtaining new cereblon ligands for targeted protein degradation [43,44], Xie and coworkers [45] explored the ortho-effect produced by a methyl group (Figure 13). The authors modified phenyl dihydrouracil (PDHU) (50) (cereblon Kd = 3.05 μM) and observed that the ortho-substituted methyl analog (51) had improved binding potency (cereblon Kd = 1.24 μM). Given this result, the authors selected this compound for further modification and explored the vector at the meta-position for attachment of the linker and of the “protein of interest” ligand subunit. The authors identified compound 52 with the best affinity (Kd = 0.21 μM) for cereblon. The ortho-methylated cereblon ligands were explored and allowed the identification of potent bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) degraders [45].

3.10. Putative Dual Inhibitor of Tubulin and EGFR by Phenotypic Approach

Barbosa and colleagues [46] described a series of combretastatin A-4 analogs based on the N-acylhydrazone (NAH) LASSBio-1586 (54) with cytotoxic and antimitotic activity (Figure 14). Homologation [9] studies on the amide nitrogen led to the benzyl homolog of LASSBio-1586 (54), LASSBio-2070 (56), which showed microtubule-stabilizing behavior, while the methylated homolog, LASSBio-1735 (55), had microtubule-destabilizing behavior. In addition, none of the compounds had better cytotoxic activity when compared to the N-methylated compound LASSBio-1735 (55) [46].

3.11. Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors

The methylation effect was also shown to have an impact on multitarget small molecule discovery. The compounds (59 and 60) were designed through molecular hybridization [47] and bioisosteric replacement [7] strategies using 57 and 58 as starting points (Figure 15). As previously reported, 57 is an adenosine A2A receptor agonist [48], and 58 is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor [49]. Insertion of the methyl group at the amide nitrogen of the N-acylhydrazone (60) moiety significantly increased the percent inhibition of PDE4A1A compared to the non-methylated analog (59). Further evaluation showed that 60 had an IC50 of 1.08 µM for PDE4A1A inhibition and a moderate affinity for the adenosine A2A receptor (Ki = 1.5 µM), making this compound interesting for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Regardless of the presence of methyl, there is a σ-hole intramolecular interaction between the sulfur atom of the thiophene ring and the nitrogen atom of the imine, which establishes the bioactive conformation for the system, as already described for N-acylhydrazone derivatives [50,51]. However, with the N-methylation of the amide, there is a greater stabilization of this conformation and, consequently, an improvement in biological activity (Figure 15) [50].
Brullo and colleagues [52] designed and synthesized methylated PDE4 inhibitors as possible candidates for Alzheimer’s disease treatment due to their role in pro-cognitive effects. The authors observed that the methylated open-chain linkers were superior to both de-methylated and cyclic conformationally constrained analogs. For example, the methylated compound 62 showed an IC50 of 0.47 µM (PDE4D3), and the de-methylated 61 compound had an IC50 of 11 μM (PDE4D3) (Figure 16). In addition, crystallographic studies showed that the methyl group was able to interact with the binding site and improve potency while maintaining the linker flexibility necessary for inhibitors to interact with PDE4 [52].
Nunes et al. [53] reported the optimization of the sulfonamide prototype LASSBio-448 (63) [54], a PDE4 inhibitor (PDE4A IC50 = 0.7 μM; PDE4D IC50 = 4.7 μM), for the treatment of pulmonary inflammatory diseases such as asthma (Figure 17. In this work, the authors investigated the methyl effect by designing and synthesizing methylated homologs on the Nsp3 of a series of sulfonamides and sulfonylhydrazones. While the non-methylated sulfonylhydrazone LASSBio-1624 (64) was inactive against PDE4, the N-methylated sulfonylhydrazone derivative, LASSBio-1632 (65), was active, showing anti-asthmatic activity associated with the inhibition of PDE4A (IC50 = 0.5 μM) and PDE4D (IC50 = 0.7 μM). The authors also reported that the lead compound was able to block airway hyperreactivity and TNF-α production in lung tissue [53].

3.12. Rho-Associated Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors

ROCK inhibitors have emerged as interesting candidates for treating neurodegenerative diseases [55,56]. A series of N-sulfonylhydrazone derivatives were designed as Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitors [57] through molecular hybridization between the approved drug fasudil (67), a ROCK inhibitor [58], and 66, a previously reported inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta (IKKβ) [59] (Figure 18). Within this molecular framework (68), 69 was discovered to have low micromolar activity for ROCK1/2 inhibition. N-methylation of 69 resulted in 70, which was three- to fourfold more potent for ROCK1/2 inhibition [57].

3.13. Ligands of Toll-like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 Complex

Zhang and coworkers [60] demonstrated that Toll-like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 (TLR4/MD-2) complex [61,62] recognizes methamphetamine (71a and 71b) non-enantioselectively, whereas amphetamine (72a and 72b) is inactive. Compared to amphetamine (72) (MD-2 Kd not detectable up to 40 μM), the increased TLR4/MD-2 binding affinity of methamphetamine ((+)-71a MD-2 Kd = 7.0 μM; (−)-71b MD-2 Kd = 8.9 μM) suggests that the methyl group is essential for molecular recognition (Figure 19). Molecular dynamics simulations (20 ns) and binding free energies determined by the MM-PBSA technique indicated that (+)-71a and (−)-71b had comparable binding free energies. Further energy analysis revealed that hydrophobic interactions are predominantly responsible for the binding of methamphetamine/amphetamine to TLR4/MD-2 [60].

3.14. Human Ghrelin Receptor Agonist

Other interesting examples of the use of methyl groups in optimization processes are macrocycles and peptides, which normally lack adequate physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties [63,64]. In these cases, the methyl effect can be exploited to optimize these properties through conformational restriction.
A key example is the discovery of ulimorelin (74), a compound that has reached Phase 3 clinical trials. Ulimorelin (74) acts as an agonist of the human ghrelin receptor (also known as the growth hormone secretagogue receptor—GHSR) and has gastroprokinetic properties. The development of 74 was initiated by an HTS campaign that led to the identification of 73 (Figure 20). Despite its high potency, 73 did not show adequate pharmacokinetic properties, and modification of the macrocycle methylation pattern helped to stabilize the bioactive conformation of this compound, resulting in the discovery of ulimorelin (74), which was four- to fivefold more potent for receptor activation and showed minimally adequate pharmacokinetic properties to enter the clinical phase [65]. It is important to note that during the SAR investigation, the side chain modification of isoleucine to cyclopropyl and the introduction of para-fluor on the phenyl ring of 74 did not significantly affect the affinity of the compound. The authors reported that cyclopropyl is more metabolically stable than the side chain of isoleucine and that para-fluor resulted in an optimization of the ligand lipophilicity efficiency (LLE) [65].

3.15. Pan-Genotype NS3/4A Protease Inhibitors

The results reported by Sun and colleagues [66] highlight the effect of the methyl group in improving bioavailability following oral administration to rats of pan-genotype NS3/4A protease inhibitors for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection [67]. First, the authors incorporated two methyl groups on 75 (IC50 = 51 nM) to produce 76, a compound with improved activity (IC50 = 8 nM) against the genotype 3a (GT-3a) NS3/4A protease (Figure 21). Based on this compound, a series of macrocycles were designed to obtain a better in vivo profile. The authors addressed the metabolic liability of 76 by exploring the deuteration strategy and highlighted that an optimal profile was obtained by incorporating a CF3 into the Boc group and an additional methyl next to the polar acylsulfonamide moiety (77, IC50 = 4.8 nM). These modifications led to improvements in both in vivo distribution and metabolic stability [66].

3.16. Class I Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors

The authors of [68] investigated the impact of the presence of the methyl group in the design of selective Class I HDAC inhibitors as interesting candidates for cancer treatment. For example, in the macrocyclic prototype 79 (HDAC1-3 range of IC50 = 3.1–8.9 nM) [69], removal of the methyl group from the propenyl group resulted in compound 78 (Figure 22). Removal of the methyl group (78) was detrimental, resulting in IC50 activities in the range of 69–110 nM (HDAC1-3). When a second methyl group was added (80), a small decrease in the inhibitory activity was observed (HDAC1-3 range of IC50 = 11–21 nM). Theoretical modeling studies suggested that the binding pocket better fits the dehydrobutyrine moiety of 79, which contains only one methyl group in the olefin subunit and seems to be important for the inhibition of HDACs from Class I [68].

3.17. Trypanocidal Analogs of Benznidazole

To design new analogs of benznidazole (81), Alcantara and coworkers [70] made changes to the imidazole ring, moving the nitro group to position 4 and incorporating the methyl group in position 2 (Figure 23). The authors added the methyl group based on studies showing that potency and solubility could be improved, and they moved the nitro group to position 4 based on results suggesting that such derivatives are non-toxic. In addition, the authors performed molecular hybridization based on the N-acylhydrazone cruzain inhibitor 82 (IC50 = 0.6 μM). The imidazole-N-arylhydrazone hybrids were tested against trypomastigote forms, and the results showed that the 4-chlorophenyl derivative (83) had the best trypanocidal activity with an IC50 of 206.98 μM [70].

3.18. Antibacterial Agents

Based on previously described β-ketoacyl acyl carrier protein synthase (FabH) inhibitors, compounds 84–86 [71], a series of furoxan-sulfonylhydrazone derivatives (87) were designed as new antibacterial agents (Figure 24) [72]. From the SAR studies, compound 88 was identified as the most potent of the series, in which the methyl group proved to be an important structural feature compared to other substituents [72].

3.19. Phosphonate Derivatives as Anticancer Agents

A series of bis-(3-indolyl)methane phosphonate derivatives were synthesized as anticancer agents (89–92). Overall, compounds methylated at position 5 of the bis-indole core (89 and 91) showed increased potency for inhibiting cell proliferation of ovarian and lung cancer cell lines compared to unmethylated analogs (90 and 92) (Figure 25) [73].

4. The Methylation Effect in Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Property Optimization

4.1. Methylation Effect on Aqueous Solubility

A series of N-acylhydrazone derivatives were designed as HDAC6/8-selective inhibitors for cancer treatment [74]. The series was designed from the natural product trichostatin A (93) using bioisosteric replacement [6,7] and conformational restriction [5] strategies. The most potent compounds in the series were 94 and 95, which differed structurally by a single methyl group (Figure 26). In this case, the magic methyl did not significantly change the activity, but the aqueous solubility was significantly increased by its presence [74], which is probably a consequence of the strong conformational effect caused by the N-methylation of N-acylhydrazone derivatives [75].

4.2. Methylation Effect on Plasma Stability

In the next case study, morpholin-2-one derivatives (96–99) were identified as fungicidal agents against Candida and Aspergillus species (Figure 27) [76]. However, the development of this series was hampered by low plasmatic stability, probably related to lactone hydrolysis. The introduction of methyl groups at the 6-position of the morpholin-2-one scaffold (96–99) led to a significant improvement in plasmatic stability while maintaining in vitro antifungal activity. The gemdimethyl derivative 99 was the most stable derivative as a consequence of the higher steric hindrance of lactone hydrolysis [76].

4.3. Methylation Effect on hERG Potassium Channel Inhibition

Jin and coworkers [77] reported the introduction of methyl groups into the aminopropylamine chain of compound 100 (checkpoint kinase 1—CHK1 IC50 = 20.9 nM) to provide a series of CHK1 inhibitors. These compounds showed excellent inhibitory activity, and compound 101 was the most potent (CHK1 IC50 = 16.1 nM). Additionally, 101 showed reduced inhibition of the human ether-à-go-go-related (hERG) potassium channel (35.5% at 10 μM) compared to 100 (43.4% at 10 μM) (Figure 28). Furthermore, the authors suggested that the introduction of the gem-dimethyl group improved in vivo metabolic stability compared to linear amines [77].
In another study, Ma and colleagues [78] designed analogs of the mu opioid receptor (MOR) ligand NAN (102) [79], a 6α-N-7′-indolyl-substituted naltrexamine derivative, which showed promising pharmacological effects but had significant hERG potassium channel liability (Figure 29). According to in vivo morphine-induced antinociception assays, compound 103 was the most potent antagonist. This compound (103) bears a methyl group at the 2′ position of the indole ring and had a sevenfold lower potency for hERG potassium channel inhibition compared to NAN (101) [78].

4.4. Methylation Effect on Metabolism

Liu and coworkers [80] reported the modulation of linkers of phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitors and found that by introducing the “magic methyl” group they had the best balance between oxidative metabolism, stability, and potency. The quinazolinone derivative 104 showed significant inhibitory potency on PI3Kδ with an IC50 value of 0.008 μM (Figure 30). However, compound 104 showed a high clearance with a Clint value of 21.80 µL/mg/min in human liver microsomes (HLMs). Additional metabolite identification studies of compound 104 revealed that oxidation of the five-membered pyrrolidine linker was the main soft spot for metabolic reactions. This led to the design of new analogs of 104, resulting in compound 105, which demonstrated favorable bioavailability in Sprague-Dawley rats following intravenous and oral treatment. In addition, compound 105 had a PI3Kδ IC50 of 0.014 μM and activated basophils and B cells and was effective in a collagen-induced arthritis model [80].

5. Perspectives

Analyzing the state of the art in the use of the methyl effect in medicinal chemistry, it is evident that its applicability to the discovery and optimization of new small-molecule drug candidates is indisputable. In this review, the importance of this group for improving pharmacodynamic properties has been discussed, highlighted by the discovery of the recently approved anticancer drug tazemetostat (8), where the authors found that four methyl groups inserted at different positions resulted in a stunning >100,000-fold improvement in activity. Indeed, there are many examples focusing on the effect of methylation on the pharmacodynamic properties of bioactive molecules. However, in this review some examples of the influence of the methyl group on the pharmacokinetic and physicochemical profile of drug candidates have been presented, covering its use to block metabolic soft spots, reduce hERG liability, improve aqueous solubility, and increase plasma stability. From its participation in the molecular recognition process of pharmacological targets to the modulation of ADMET properties, the “magic methyl” never ceases to surprise us. We hope that the key examples discussed here will help the scientific community to further understand either the relationship between the structure and biological activity of new chemical entities or the rational application of methylation and what can be expected from this process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.d.S.M.P., L.S.F. and C.A.M.F.; data curation, P.d.S.M.P. and L.S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, P.d.S.M.P. and L.S.F.; writing—review and editing, P.d.S.M.P., L.S.F. and C.A.M.F.; supervision, C.A.M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank INCT-INOFAR (BR, grant number 465.249/2014-0 and CNPq 115866/2023-0, fellowship to LSF), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, grant numbers E-26/010.001273/2016 and SEI-260003/003613/2022, fellowship to CAMF), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, grant number 304.811/2022-0), and Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia, Ministério da Saúde (DECIT-MS).

Acknowledgments

We dedicate this work to Emeritus Professor of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Eliezer J. Barreiro, who built his career as a medicinal chemist of excellence and contributed profoundly to the development of this scientific field.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barreiro, E.J.; Kümmerle, A.E.; Fraga, C.A.M. The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5215–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bissantz, C.; Kuhn, B.; Stahl, M. A Medicinal Chemist’s Guide to Molecular Interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5061–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Klebe, G. Applying Thermodynamic Profiling in Lead Finding and Optimization. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2015, 14, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, Y.; Tice, C.M.; Singh, S.B. Conformational Control in Structure-Based Drug Design. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 2825–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. de Sena, M.; Pinheiro, P.; Rodrigues, D.A.; do Couto Maia, R.; Thota, S.; Fraga, C.A.M. The Use of Conformational Restriction in Medicinal Chemistry. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1712–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patani, G.A.; LaVoie, E.J. Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3147–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lima, L.; Barreiro, E. Bioisosterism: A Useful Strategy for Molecular Modification and Drug Design. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 23–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lima, L.M.; Barreiro, E.J. Beyond Bioisosterism: New Concepts in Drug Discovery. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 186–210. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lima, L.M.; Alves, M.A.; do Amaral, D.N. Homologation: A Versatile Molecular Modification Strategy to Drug Discovery. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1734–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ishikawa, M.; Hashimoto, Y. Improvement in Aqueous Solubility in Small Molecule Drug Discovery Programs by Disruption of Molecular Planarity and Symmetry. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 1539–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ishikawa, M.; Hashimoto, Y. Improving the Water-Solubility of Compounds by Molecular Modification to Disrupt Crystal Packing. In The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 747–765. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schönherr, H.; Cernak, T. Profound Methyl Effects in Drug Discovery and a Call for New C—H Methylation Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12256–12267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aynetdinova, D.; Callens, M.C.; Hicks, H.B.; Poh, C.Y.X.; Shennan, B.D.A.; Boyd, A.M.; Lim, Z.H.; Leitch, J.A.; Dixon, D.J. Installing the “Magic Methyl”—C–H Methylation in Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 5517–5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leung, C.S.; Leung, S.S.F.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W.L. Methyl Effects on Protein–Ligand Binding. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4489–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. FDA Granted Accelerated Approval to Tazemetostat for Follicular Lymphoma. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-granted-accelerated-approval-tazemetostat-follicular-lymphoma (accessed on 12 August 2023).
  16. Kuntz, K.W.; Campbell, J.E.; Keilhack, H.; Pollock, R.M.; Knutson, S.K.; Porter-Scott, M.; Richon, V.M.; Sneeringer, C.J.; Wigle, T.J.; Allain, C.J.; et al. The Importance of Being Me: Magic Methyls, Methyltransferase Inhibitors, and the Discovery of Tazemetostat. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1556–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Makita, S.; Tobinai, K. Targeting EZH2 with Tazemetostat. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 586–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaniskan, H.Ü.; Martini, M.L.; Jin, J. Inhibitors of Protein Methyltransferases and Demethylases. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 989–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, B.; Liang, X.; Mei, H.; Qi, S.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, A.; Zou, F.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; et al. Discovery of IHMT-EZH2-115 as a Potent and Selective Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) Inhibitor for the Treatment of B-Cell Lymphomas. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 15170–15188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lan, S.; Yu, S.; Ma, X.; Luo, D.; Shan, H.; Zhong, X.; Yan, G.; Li, R. Discovery of 2-Methyl-2-(4-(2-Methyl-8-(1 H -Pyrrolo[2,3- b ]Pyridin-6-Yl)-1 H -Naphtho[1,2- d ]Imidazol-1-Yl)Phenyl)Propanenitrile as a Novel PI3K/MTOR Inhibitor with Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 12781–12801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, T.-J.; Koul, D.; LaFortune, T.; Tiao, N.; Shen, R.J.; Maira, S.-M.; Garcia-Echevrria, C.; Yung, W.K.A. NVP-BEZ235, a Novel Dual Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor, Elicits Multifaceted Antitumor Activities in Human Gliomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 2204–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodrigues, D.A.; Sagrillo, F.S.; Fraga, C.A.M. Duvelisib: A 2018 Novel FDA-Approved Small Molecule Inhibiting Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Kwok-Shing Ng, P.; Kucherlapati, M.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Tsang, Y.H.; de Velasco, G.; Jeong, K.J.; Akbani, R.; Hadjipanayis, A.; et al. A Pan-Cancer Proteogenomic Atlas of PI3K/AKT/MTOR Pathway Alterations. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 820–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carroll, F.I.; Carlezon, W.A. Development of κ Opioid Receptor Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 2178–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kormos, C.M.; Ondachi, P.W.; Runyon, S.P.; Thomas, J.B.; Mascarella, S.W.; Decker, A.M.; Navarro, H.A.; Carroll, F.I. Simple Tetrahydroisoquinolines Are Potent and Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 742–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ondachi, P.W.; Kormos, C.M.; Runyon, S.P.; Thomas, J.B.; Mascarella, S.W.; Decker, A.M.; Navarro, H.A.; Fennell, T.R.; Snyder, R.W.; Carroll, F.I. Potent and Selective Tetrahydroisoquinoline Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists of Lead Compound (3 R)-7-Hydroxy- N -[(1 S)-2-Methyl-1-(Piperidin-1-Ylmethyl)Propyl]-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-Carboxamide (PDTic). J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7525–7545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aizpurua-Olaizola, O.; Elezgarai, I.; Rico-Barrio, I.; Zarandona, I.; Etxebarria, N.; Usobiaga, A. Targeting the Endocannabinoid System: Future Therapeutic Strategies. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pennant, N.M.; Hinton, C.V. The Evolution of Cannabinoid Receptors in Cancer. WIREs Mech. Dis. 2023, 15, e1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tuo, W.; Bollier, M.; Leleu-Chavain, N.; Lemaire, L.; Barczyk, A.; Dezitter, X.; Klupsch, F.; Szczepanski, F.; Spencer, J.; Chavatte, P.; et al. Development of Novel Oxazolo[5,4-d]Pyrimidines as Competitive CB2 Neutral Antagonists Based on Scaffold Hopping. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 146, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hollinshead, S.P.; Tidwell, M.W.; Palmer, J.; Guidetti, R.; Sanderson, A.; Johnson, M.P.; Chambers, M.G.; Oskins, J.; Stratford, R.; Astles, P.C. Selective Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 (CB2) Agonists: Optimization of a Series of Purines Leading to the Identification of a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Osteoarthritic Pain. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5722–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mugnaini, C.; Rabbito, A.; Brizzi, A.; Palombi, N.; Petrosino, S.; Verde, R.; Di Marzo, V.; Ligresti, A.; Corelli, F. Synthesis of Novel 2-(1-Adamantanylcarboxamido)Thiophene Derivatives. Selective Cannabinoid Type 2 (CB2) Receptor Agonists as Potential Agents for the Treatment of Skin Inflammatory Disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 161, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Garai, S.; Leo, L.M.; Szczesniak, A.-M.; Hurst, D.P.; Schaffer, P.C.; Zagzoog, A.; Black, T.; Deschamps, J.R.; Miess, E.; Schulz, S.; et al. Discovery of a Biased Allosteric Modulator for Cannabinoid 1 Receptor: Preclinical Anti-Glaucoma Efficacy. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 8104–8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Laprairie, R.B.; Kulkarni, P.M.; Deschamps, J.R.; Kelly, M.E.M.; Janero, D.R.; Cascio, M.G.; Stevenson, L.A.; Pertwee, R.G.; Kenakin, T.P.; Denovan-Wright, E.M.; et al. Enantiospecific Allosteric Modulation of Cannabinoid 1 Receptor. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 1188–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Erlanson, D.A.; Fesik, S.W.; Hubbard, R.E.; Jahnke, W.; Jhoti, H. Twenty Years on: The Impact of Fragments on Drug Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 605–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rees, D.C.; Congreve, M.; Murray, C.W.; Carr, R. Fragment-Based Lead Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Graaf, C.; Kooistra, A.J.; Vischer, H.F.; Katritch, V.; Kuijer, M.; Shiroishi, M.; Iwata, S.; Shimamura, T.; Stevens, R.C.; de Esch, I.J.P.; et al. Crystal Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Fragment-like Ligands of the Human Histamine H 1 Receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8195–8206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuhne, S.; Kooistra, A.J.; Bosma, R.; Bortolato, A.; Wijtmans, M.; Vischer, H.F.; Mason, J.S.; de Graaf, C.; de Esch, I.J.P.; Leurs, R. Identification of Ligand Binding Hot Spots of the Histamine H 1 Receptor Following Structure-Based Fragment Optimization. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9047–9061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moreau, R.J.; Skepper, C.K.; Appleton, B.A.; Blechschmidt, A.; Balibar, C.J.; Benton, B.M.; Drumm, J.E.; Feng, B.Y.; Geng, M.; Li, C.; et al. Fragment-Based Drug Discovery of Inhibitors of Phosphopantetheine Adenylyltransferase from Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 3309–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nigg, E.A. Mitotic Kinases as Regulators of Cell Division and Its Checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, J.; Shi, Q.; Choudhry, N.; Li, H.; Yang, C.; Kalashova, J.; Yan, Z.; Li, J.; Reddy, M.C.; Gopala, S.G.; et al. Discovery and Optimization of Seven-Membered Lactam-Based Compounds to Phenocopy the Inhibition of the Aurora Kinase B. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, J.; Yan, Z.; Li, H.; Shi, Q.; Huang, L.; Nimishetti, N.; Allen, T.D.; Yang, D.; Zhang, J. A High-Content Screen for Anti-Mitosis and Polyploidy-Induction Identifies an Unknown Activity of Two Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids from Corydalis Longicalcarata. Phytochem. Lett. 2021, 41, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hoveyda, H.R.; Fraser, G.L.; Roy, M.-O.; Dutheuil, G.; Batt, F.; El Bousmaqui, M.; Korac, J.; Lenoir, F.; Lapin, A.; Noël, S.; et al. Discovery and Optimization of Novel Antagonists to the Human Neurokinin-3 Receptor for the Treatment of Sex-Hormone Disorders (Part I). J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 3060–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cieślak, M.; Słowianek, M. Cereblon-Recruiting PROTACs: Will New Drugs Have to Face Old Challenges? Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Boichenko, I.; Bär, K.; Deiss, S.; Heim, C.; Albrecht, R.; Lupas, A.N.; Hernandez Alvarez, B.; Hartmann, M.D. Chemical Ligand Space of Cereblon. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 11163–11171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xie, H.; Li, C.; Tang, H.; Tandon, I.; Liao, J.; Roberts, B.L.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, W. Development of Substituted Phenyl Dihydrouracil as the Novel Achiral Cereblon Ligands for Targeted Protein Degradation. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 2904–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barbosa, G.; Gelves, L.G.V.; Costa, C.M.X.; Franco, L.S.; de Lima, J.A.L.; Aparecida-Silva, C.; Teixeira, J.D.; Mermelstein, C.d.S.; Barreiro, E.J.; Lima, L.M. Discovery of Putative Dual Inhibitor of Tubulin and EGFR by Phenotypic Approach on LASSBio-1586 Homologs. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Viegas-Junior, C.; Danuello, A.; da Silva Bolzani, V.; Barreiro, E.J.; Fraga, C.A.M. Manssour Fraga Molecular Hybridization: A Useful Tool in the Design of New Drug Prototypes. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1829–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Leal, C.M.; Pereira, S.L.; Kümmerle, A.E.; Leal, D.M.; Tesch, R.; de Sant’Anna, C.M.R.; Fraga, C.A.M.; Barreiro, E.J.; Sudo, R.T.; Zapata-Sudo, G. Antihypertensive Profile of 2-Thienyl-3,4-Methylenedioxybenzoylhydrazone Is Mediated by Activation of the A2A Adenosine Receptor. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kümmerle, A.E.; Schmitt, M.; Cardozo, S.V.S.; Lugnier, C.; Villa, P.; Lopes, A.B.; Romeiro, N.C.; Justiniano, H.; Martins, M.A.; Fraga, C.A.M.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Pharmacological Evaluation of N -Acylhydrazones and Novel Conformationally Constrained Compounds as Selective and Potent Orally Active Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 7525–7545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bastos, I.; Pinheiro, P.; Costa, F.; Rocha, M.; Sant’Anna, C.; Braz, D.; Souza, E.; Martins, M.; Barreiro, E.; Ferreira, F.; et al. Design, Synthesis, Experimental and Theoretical Characterization of a New Multitarget 2-Thienyl-N-Acylhydrazone Derivative. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pinheiro, P.d.S.M.; Rodrigues, D.A.; Alves, M.A.; Tinoco, L.W.; Ferreira, G.B.; de Sant’Anna, C.M.R.; Fraga, C.A.M. Theoretical and Experimental Characterization of 1,4-N⋯S σ-Hole Intramolecular Interactions in Bioactive N -Acylhydrazone Derivatives. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brullo, C.; Rapetti, F.; Abbate, S.; Prosdocimi, T.; Torretta, A.; Semrau, M.; Massa, M.; Alfei, S.; Storici, P.; Parisini, E.; et al. Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Structural Characterization of Novel GEBR Library PDE4D Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 223, 113638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nunes, I.K.d.C.; de Souza, E.T.; Martins, I.R.R.; Barbosa, G.; Moraes Junior, M.O.d.; Medeiros, M.d.M.; Silva, S.W.D.; Balliano, T.L.; da Silva, B.A.; Silva, P.M.R.; et al. Discovery of Sulfonyl Hydrazone Derivative as a New Selective PDE4A and PDE4D Inhibitor by Lead-Optimization Approach on the Prototype LASSBio-448: In Vitro and in Vivo Preclinical Studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 204, 112492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nunes, I.K.d.C.; de Souza, E.T.; Cardozo, S.V.S.; Carvalho, V.d.F.; Romeiro, N.C.; Silva, P.M.R.e.; Martins, M.A.; Barreiro, E.J.; Lima, L.M. Synthesis, Pharmacological Profile and Docking Studies of New Sulfonamides Designed as Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitors. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tolomeu, H.V.; Fraga, C.A.M. The Outcomes of Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors and the Role of ROCK2 as a Molecular Target for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. CNS Neurol. Disord Drug Targets 2022, 21, 188–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Montagnoli, T.L.; de Oliveira, D.R.; Fraga, C.A.M. Therapeutic Perspectives on ROCK Inhibition for Cerebral Cavernous Malformations. Kinases Phosphatases 2023, 1, 72–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Oliveira, R.G.; Guerra, F.S.; Mermelstein, C.d.S.; Fernandes, P.D.; Bastos, I.T.d.S.; Costa, F.N.; Barroso, R.C.R.; Ferreira, F.F.; Fraga, C.A.M. Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel Isoquinoline N -Sulphonylhydrazones Designed as ROCK Inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 1181–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jacobs, M.; Hayakawa, K.; Swenson, L.; Bellon, S.; Fleming, M.; Taslimi, P.; Doran, J. The Structure of Dimeric ROCK I Reveals the Mechanism for Ligand Selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Avila, C.M.; Lopes, A.B.; Gonçalves, A.S.; da Silva, L.L.; Romeiro, N.C.; Miranda, A.L.P.; Sant’Anna, C.M.R.; Barreiro, E.J.; Fraga, C.A.M. Structure-Based Design and Biological Profile of (E)-N-(4-Nitrobenzylidene)-2-Naphthohydrazide, a Novel Small Molecule Inhibitor of IκB Kinase-β. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Peng, Y.; Wang, X. Exploring Methamphetamine Nonenantioselectively Targeting Toll-like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 by in Silico Simulations and Wet-Lab Techniques. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020, 60, 1607–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bachtell, R.; Hutchinson, M.; Wang, X.; Rice, K.; Maier, S.; Watkins, L. Targeting the Toll of Drug Abuse: The Translational Potential of Toll-Like Receptor 4. CNS Neurol. Disord Drug Targets 2015, 14, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, X.; Northcutt, A.L.; Cochran, T.A.; Zhang, X.; Fabisiak, T.J.; Haas, M.E.; Amat, J.; Li, H.; Rice, K.C.; Maier, S.F.; et al. Methamphetamine Activates Toll-Like Receptor 4 to Induce Central Immune Signaling within the Ventral Tegmental Area and Contributes to Extracellular Dopamine Increase in the Nucleus Accumbens Shell. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 3622–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Räder, A.F.B.; Weinmüller, M.; Reichart, F.; Schumacher-Klinger, A.; Merzbach, S.; Gilon, C.; Hoffman, A.; Kessler, H. Orally Active Peptides: Is There a Magic Bullet? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14414–14438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vinogradov, A.A.; Yin, Y.; Suga, H. Macrocyclic Peptides as Drug Candidates: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4167–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hoveyda, H.R.; Marsault, E.; Gagnon, R.; Mathieu, A.P.; Vézina, M.; Landry, A.; Wang, Z.; Benakli, K.; Beaubien, S.; Saint-Louis, C.; et al. Optimization of the Potency and Pharmacokinetic Properties of a Macrocyclic Ghrelin Receptor Agonist (Part I): Development of Ulimorelin (TZP-101) from Hit to Clinic. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8305–8320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sun, L.-Q.; Mull, E.; D’Andrea, S.; Zheng, B.; Hiebert, S.; Gillis, E.; Bowsher, M.; Kandhasamy, S.; Baratam, V.R.; Puttaswamy, S.; et al. Discovery of BMS-986144, a Third-Generation, Pan-Genotype NS3/4A Protease Inhibitor for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 14740–14760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vermehren, J.; Park, J.S.; Jacobson, I.M.; Zeuzem, S. Challenges and Perspectives of Direct Antivirals for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, K.; Yao, Y.; Tu, Z.; Liao, C.; Wang, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Chen, D.; Hamilton, D.J.; Li, Z.; Jiang, S. Discovery of Class I Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Based on Romidpesin with Promising Selectivity for Cancer Cells. Future Med. Chem. 2020, 12, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yao, Y.; Tu, Z.; Liao, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Yao, H.; Li, Z.; Jiang, S. Discovery of Novel Class I Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors with Promising in Vitro and in Vivo Antitumor Activities. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7672–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Alcântara, G.P.; Barbosa, J.M.C.; Salomão, K.; de Castro, S.L.; Wardell, J.L.; Low, J.N.; Wardell, S.M.S.V.; Carvalho, S.A.; da Silva, E.F.; Fraga, C.A.M. New 4-Nitro-Imidazole-N-Glycinyl-Hydrazones Designed as Trypanocidal Analogues of Benznidazole. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2023, 20, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Tang, J.-F.; Yang, Y.-S.; Chen, R.-Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, H.-L. Design, Synthesis and Antibacterial Activities of Vanillic Acylhydrazone Derivatives as Potential β-Ketoacyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Synthase III (FabH) Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 57, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Segretti, N.D.; Serafim, R.A.M.; Segretti, M.C.F.; Miyata, M.; Coelho, F.R.; Augusto, O.; Ferreira, E.I. New Antibacterial Agents: Hybrid Bioisoster Derivatives as Potential E. Coli FabH Inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 3988–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Maestro, A.; Martín-Encinas, E.; Alonso, C.; Martinez de Marigorta, E.; Rubiales, G.; Vicario, J.; Palacios, F. Synthesis of Novel Antiproliferative Hybrid Bis-(3-Indolyl)Methane Phosphonate Derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 158, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rodrigues, D.A.; Ferreira-Silva, G.À.; Ferreira, A.C.S.; Fernandes, R.A.; Kwee, J.K.; Sant’Anna, C.M.R.; Ionta, M.; Fraga, C.A.M. Design, Synthesis, and Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel N -Acylhydrazone Derivatives as Potent Histone Deacetylase 6/8 Dual Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 655–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kümmerle, A.E.; Raimundo, J.M.; Leal, C.M.; da Silva, G.S.; Balliano, T.L.; Pereira, M.A.; de Simone, C.A.; Sudo, R.T.; Zapata-Sudo, G.; Fraga, C.A.M. Studies towards the Identification of Putative Bioactive Conformation of Potent Vasodilator Arylidene N-Acylhydrazone Derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 4004–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bardiot, D.; Thevissen, K.; De Brucker, K.; Peeters, A.; Cos, P.; Taborda, C.P.; McNaughton, M.; Maes, L.; Chaltin, P.; Cammue, B.P.A.; et al. 2-(2-Oxo-Morpholin-3-Yl)-Acetamide Derivatives as Broad-Spectrum Antifungal Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 1502–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jin, T.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Hu, X.; Zhang, R.; Wu, Z.; Du, W.; Kan, W.; Li, K.; Wang, C.; et al. Discovery and Development of a Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable CHK1 Inhibitor Candidate: 5-((4-((3-Amino-3-Methylbutyl)Amino)-5-(Trifluoromethyl)Pyrimidin-2-Yl)Amino)Picolinonitrile. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 15069–15090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ma, H.; Pagare, P.P.; Li, M.; Neel, L.T.; Mendez, R.E.; Gillespie, J.C.; Stevens, D.L.; Dewey, W.L.; Selley, D.E.; Zhang, Y. Structural Alterations of the “Address” Moiety of NAN Leading to the Discovery of a Novel Opioid Receptor Modulator with Reduced HERG Toxicity. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 577–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Obeng, S.; Jali, A.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Schwienteck, K.L.; Chen, C.; Stevens, D.L.; Akbarali, H.I.; Dewey, W.L.; Banks, M.L.; et al. Characterization of 17-Cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-Dihydroxy-4,5α-Epoxy-6α-(Indole-7-Carboxamido)Morphinan (NAN) as a Novel Opioid Receptor Modulator for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2518–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, K.; Li, D.; Zheng, W.; Shi, M.; Chen, Y.; Tang, M.; Yang, T.; Zhao, M.; Deng, D.; Zhang, C.; et al. Discovery, Optimization, and Evaluation of Quinazolinone Derivatives with Novel Linkers as Orally Efficacious Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase Delta Inhibitors for Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 8951–8970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g001
Figure 1. The discovery of anticancer FDA-approved drug tazemetostat (8) [16].
Figure 1. The discovery of anticancer FDA-approved drug tazemetostat (8) [16].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g001
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g002
Figure 2. The methylation effect in the discovery of EZH2-selective inhibitors [19].
Figure 2. The methylation effect in the discovery of EZH2-selective inhibitors [19].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g002
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g003
Figure 3. The methylation effect in the design of PI3K/mTOR inhibitors [20].
Figure 3. The methylation effect in the design of PI3K/mTOR inhibitors [20].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g003
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g004
Figure 4. The methylation effect in the discovery of selective κ opioid receptor antagonists [26].
Figure 4. The methylation effect in the discovery of selective κ opioid receptor antagonists [26].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g004
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g005
Figure 5. Design of oxazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidines series as new CB1/CB2 receptor modulators [29].
Figure 5. Design of oxazolo[5,4-d]pyrimidines series as new CB1/CB2 receptor modulators [29].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g005
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g006
Figure 6. Design of selective CB2R agonists as potential agents for the treatment of skin inflammatory disease [31].
Figure 6. Design of selective CB2R agonists as potential agents for the treatment of skin inflammatory disease [31].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g006
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g007
Figure 7. Methylation effect on the design of modulators for CB1R [32].
Figure 7. Methylation effect on the design of modulators for CB1R [32].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g007
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g008
Figure 8. Methylation effect on fragment-like discovery of H1R antagonists [37].
Figure 8. Methylation effect on fragment-like discovery of H1R antagonists [37].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g008
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g009
Figure 9. Fragment-based drug discovery of phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase inhibitors [38].
Figure 9. Fragment-based drug discovery of phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase inhibitors [38].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g009
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g010
Figure 10. The methylation effect in fragment optimization [38].
Figure 10. The methylation effect in fragment optimization [38].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g010
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g011
Figure 11. The methylation effect in polyploidy-inducing activity correlated to genetic depletion of AURKB [40].
Figure 11. The methylation effect in polyploidy-inducing activity correlated to genetic depletion of AURKB [40].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g011
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g012
Figure 12. Methylation effect in the discovery of antagonists of the neurokinin-3 receptor (NK3R) [42].
Figure 12. Methylation effect in the discovery of antagonists of the neurokinin-3 receptor (NK3R) [42].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g012
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g013
Figure 13. The methylation effect in new cereblon ligands for targeted protein degradation [45].
Figure 13. The methylation effect in new cereblon ligands for targeted protein degradation [45].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g013
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g014
Figure 14. The methylation effect in combretastatin A-4 analogs [46].
Figure 14. The methylation effect in combretastatin A-4 analogs [46].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g014
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g015
Figure 15. The methylation effect stabilizing bioactive conformation of multitarget N-acylhydrazone derivatives [50].
Figure 15. The methylation effect stabilizing bioactive conformation of multitarget N-acylhydrazone derivatives [50].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g015
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g016
Figure 16. The methylation effect in the design of PDE4D inhibitors [52].
Figure 16. The methylation effect in the design of PDE4D inhibitors [52].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g016
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g017
Figure 17. Exploration of the methylation effect for the discovery of selective PDE4A and PDE4D inhibitors [53].
Figure 17. Exploration of the methylation effect for the discovery of selective PDE4A and PDE4D inhibitors [53].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g017
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g018
Figure 18. The methylation in N-sulfonylhydrazone derivatives [57].
Figure 18. The methylation in N-sulfonylhydrazone derivatives [57].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g018
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g019
Figure 19. Ligands of Toll-like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 complex [60].
Figure 19. Ligands of Toll-like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 2 complex [60].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g019
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g020
Figure 20. The methylation effect in the discovery of ulimorelin (73) [65].
Figure 20. The methylation effect in the discovery of ulimorelin (73) [65].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g020
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g021
Figure 21. The methylation effect on NS3/4A protease inhibition for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection [66].
Figure 21. The methylation effect on NS3/4A protease inhibition for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection [66].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g021
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g022
Figure 22. The methylation effect in the discovery of macrocyclic Class I HDAC inhibitors [68].
Figure 22. The methylation effect in the discovery of macrocyclic Class I HDAC inhibitors [68].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g022
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g023
Figure 23. The methylation effect in the design of trypanocidal agents [70].
Figure 23. The methylation effect in the design of trypanocidal agents [70].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g023
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g024
Figure 24. Design of sulfonylhydrazone derivatives as antibacterial agents [72].
Figure 24. Design of sulfonylhydrazone derivatives as antibacterial agents [72].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g024
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g025
Figure 25. Evaluation of bis-(3-indolyl)methane phosphonate derivatives as anticancer agents [73].
Figure 25. Evaluation of bis-(3-indolyl)methane phosphonate derivatives as anticancer agents [73].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g025
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g026
Figure 26. Methylation effect in N-acylhydrazone derivatives for aqueous solubility optimization [74].
Figure 26. Methylation effect in N-acylhydrazone derivatives for aqueous solubility optimization [74].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g026
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g027
Figure 27. The use of the methylation effect for plasma stability optimization [76].
Figure 27. The use of the methylation effect for plasma stability optimization [76].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g027
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g028
Figure 28. The exploration of the methylation effect for hERG inhibition profile optimization of CHK1 inhibitors [77].
Figure 28. The exploration of the methylation effect for hERG inhibition profile optimization of CHK1 inhibitors [77].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g028
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g029
Figure 29. The methylation effect in hERG inhibition profile optimization of mu opioid ligands [78].
Figure 29. The methylation effect in hERG inhibition profile optimization of mu opioid ligands [78].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g029
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g030
Figure 30. Metabolic profile optimization using the methylation effect [80].
Figure 30. Metabolic profile optimization using the methylation effect [80].
Pharmaceuticals 16 01157 g030
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinheiro, P.d.S.M.; Franco, L.S.; Fraga, C.A.M. The Magic Methyl and Its Tricks in Drug Discovery and Development. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081157

AMA Style

Pinheiro PdSM, Franco LS, Fraga CAM. The Magic Methyl and Its Tricks in Drug Discovery and Development. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(8):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinheiro, Pedro de Sena Murteira, Lucas Silva Franco, and Carlos Alberto Manssour Fraga. 2023. "The Magic Methyl and Its Tricks in Drug Discovery and Development" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 8: 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081157

APA Style

Pinheiro, P. d. S. M., Franco, L. S., & Fraga, C. A. M. (2023). The Magic Methyl and Its Tricks in Drug Discovery and Development. Pharmaceuticals, 16(8), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop