Next Article in Journal
Gypenoside-14 Reduces Depression via Downregulation of the Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-kB) Signaling Pathway on the Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Induced Depression Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Novel Micellar-Enhanced High-Throughput Microwell Spectrofluorimetric Method for Quantification of Lorlatinib: Application to In Vitro Drug Release and Analysis of Urine Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Nanostructured Lipid Carriers to Enhance the Bioavailability and Solubility of Ranolazine: Statistical Optimization and Pharmacological Evaluations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of the Analytical Procedure Lifecycle Concept to a Quantitative 1H NMR Method for Total Dammarane-Type Saponins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 16
Issue 8
10.3390/ph16081153
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development and Validation of a Novel UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Plinabulin in Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study with Leukopenic Rats

by
Xiaochen Niu
1,
Dan Chen
1,
Wei He
1,
Yu Tang
1,2 and
Jianchun Zhao
1,2,*
1
School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Marine Biomedical Research Institute of Qingdao, Qingdao 266073, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(8), 1153; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081153
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 8 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analytical Techniques in the Pharmaceutical Sciences 2023)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plinabulin, a new antitumor drug developed from marine natural products that targets microtubules in cancer cells, is currently being tested in a phase III clinical study. Plinabulin has been clinically proven to be effective on leukopenia. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports investigating the pharmacokinetics of plinabulin in individuals with leukopenia and healthy individuals. In this study, we developed a rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the detection of plinabulin for the first time. Using a novel cyclophosphamide-induced leukopenia model, we investigated the differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of plinabulin between rats with leukopenia and normal rats. Plinabulin and propranolol (IS) peaks were separated by gradient elution for a total run time of 5 min. The methodological validation showed a good accuracy (101.96–109.42%) and precision (RSD ≤ 5.37%) with the lower limit of quantification at 0.5 ng/mL. The recovery of plinabulin was between 91.99% and 109.75% (RSD ≤ 7.92%). The values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) for leukopenia groups and control groups at doses of 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg were 148.89 ± 78.74 h·μg/L and 121.75 ± 31.56 h·μg/L; 318.15 ± 40.00 h·μg/L and 272.06 ± 42.85 h·μg/L; and 1432.43 ± 197.47 h·μg/L and 1337.12 ± 193.56 h·μg/L; respectively. The half-lives (t1/2s) of plinabulin were 0.49–0.72 h for leukopenia groups and 0.39–0.70 h for control groups at three doses, and the clearance rates (CLs) of plinabulin were 2.13–3.87 L/h/kg for leukopenia groups and 2.29–4.23 L/h/kg for control groups. Pharmacokinetic results showed that there was no significant pharmacokinetic difference between the normal group and the leukopenia group. Based on the power model, plinabulin exhibits a lack of dose proportionality over the dose range of 0.5–3 mg/kg after intravenous administration. This study provides guidance for the development of plinabulin as a potential candidate for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide and has overtaken cardiovascular disease as the world’s first leading cause of death. In 2022, 1.92 million additional cancer cases and 0.61 million deaths were reported in the United States, among which leukopenia caused by cancer chemotherapy was the main cause of death [1,2]. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) increases the risk of infection and death in cancer patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is approved for the treatment of CIN, and non-G-CSF therapy is required to improve its efficacy and minimize side effects [3]. It has been reported that plinabulin (C19H20N4O2) (Figure 1) binds colchicine sites of βII more persistently and is a novel non-G-CSF selective immunoregulatory tubulin polymerization inhibitor with hematopoietic stem cell protective properties and anticancer effects [4,5]. It has been reported that plinabulin has important functions when acting with guanine nucleotide interchange factor stimulants and is mainly used in the treatment of neutropenia and non-small cell lung cancer [6]. Previous studies have shown that plinabulin is a potent vascular destabilizer, which can ameliorate leukopenia induced by multiple chemotherapies (including docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) through a different mechanism from G-CSF [5,7]. Currently, plinabulin is in phase III clinical trials for cancer and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia [8].
Although plinabulin is in phase III clinical trials, few references and preclinical data in vivo have been published [9]. Until now, only a preclinical study of MBRI-001, a deuterium-substituted plinabulin derivative, has been published [10]. MBRI-001 exhibits pharmacokinetic profiles quite different from plinabulin in vitro, and all the data of plinabulin are in vitro results [10]. All available reports are about plinabulin combined with other drugs, and all studies are based on health status [11]. It was reported that the pharmacokinetic profiles of many drugs varied between disease and non-disease states [12,13]. In pathological states, the metabolic enzymes of some drugs and the permeability of their cell membranes have been changed, and drug-related ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) processes were altered, which led to changes in pharmacokinetic parameters [14]. However, to date, no pharmacokinetic studies of plinabulin in pathological states have been reported.
In the present study, a sensitive, reproducible, and practical method was developed for the determination of plinabulin in rat plasma and was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of plinabulin in the leukopenia state for the first time. In addition, it is also the first work where dose proportionality was studied. This study might provide a theoretical basis for research on the development of plinabulin as a potential candidate for the treatment of leukopenia.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Experimental Design

To establish a model of leukopenia induced by chemotherapy, we chose an anticancer drug cyclophosphamide (CY) because of its inhibitory effect on bone marrow [15]. Rats were injected with 50, 70, or 90 mg/kg of CY on the first and third days, respectively. The leukocytes were counted by a hemocytometer as shown in Table 1. Compared with the control group, the white blood cell (WBC) counts for rats injected with different concentrations of CY were significantly decreased (p < 0.01). The level of WBC in the CY 70 mg/kg group was the second lowest among the three groups. If the WBC level is too low, it might lead to stopping radiotherapy and chemotherapy in clinical practice. Therefore, we finally chose 70 mg/kg as the experimental dose. This dose can significantly reduce the number of WBCs while keeping the experimental animals alive.

2.2. Optimization of UHPLC-MS/MS Method

The UHPLC-MS/MS conditions were initially optimized for maximum sensitivity and resolution. In order to obtain good peak shape and chromatographic separation conditions, the composition of the mobile phase is particularly important. It was found that the addition of formic acid in the mobile phase could significantly improve peak shape and increase signal strength in our study. We tested different mobile phases, including water-acetonitrile and water-formic acid with different formic acid ratios. The addition of 0.2% formic acid to both mobile phases was found to be essential for promoting the ionization of plinabulin and internal standard (IS) propranolol (Figure 1) and could obtain good peak shape and high sensitivity. Both positive and negative ESI modes are used to optimize the mass response of plinabulin and IS, and it was found that the positive ESI mode has a higher response. In the positive ion mode, plinabulin and IS showed a protonated molecular ion at m/z 337.3 and 260.2 (Figure 2), respectively. Parameter optimization of mass spectrometer settings revealed the most abundant product ions were 309.3 for plinabulin at a collision energy of 22 V and 116.0 for IS at a collision energy of 15 V. Therefore, ion transitions for quantification were m/z 337.3 > 309.3 for plinabulin and m/z 260.2 > 116.0 for IS monitored using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.
In the early stage of method development, there were two or three product ions that were used to monitor plinabulin and IS, respectively. After the method was determined, only one product ion displayed the best response in rat plasma. Usually, we believe that when the energy is constant, monitoring multiple ions simultaneously can have an impact on the response of each ion pair. There was no endogenous interference or other impurities. Therefore, only one product ion for quantification and identity confirmation, particularly, 309.3 for plinabulin and 116.0 for IS monitored using MRM mode, was enough. Using one ion pair for monitoring and quantification is common and has been previously reported [12,13].

2.3. Method Validation

Selectivity data are presented in Figure 3. We analyzed the chromatograms of blank rat plasma, blank rat plasma spiked with plinabulin at a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and rat plasma samples collected at 15 min after intravenous injection of plinabulin. The retention times of plinabulin and IS were 1.75 min and 1.56 min, respectively. We found no interference from endogenous plasma components or other impurities.
Based on 1/x2 weighted linear regression, the calibration curve of plinabulin was the best in the range of 0.5 ng/mL to 500 ng/mL. The typical standard curves of plinabulin in the plasma of Wistar rats are shown in Table 2. The sensitivity was assessed by adding plinabulin to LLOQ using plasma from six individual blank rats. Because there were no articles about the analytical method of plinabulin or similar compounds, we have not compared the LLOQ of our study with others. In general, LLOQ of 0.5 ng/mL is sensitive for bioanalytical methods [16,17,18,19,20]. In our study, the LLOQ was 0.5 ng/mL, and the value of the signal-to-noise ratio of LLOQ was greater than 10. We have not determined the limit of detection (LOD). The reasons are below: (1) In the pharmacokinetic study of plinabulin in our study, the concentrations below LLOQ have not been included in the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Thus, the limit of detection (LOD) is not applied in our study. (2) The method was validated according to the guidelines of ICH M10 [21]. According to ICH M10, LOD is not included in the method validation.
The precision and accuracy data of the intra-day and inter-day are shown in Table 3. The inter-day precision of LLOQs was 15.95% and the intra-day precision of LLOQs was 9.42%. Relative standard deviations (RSD) of the low-quality control (LQC), middle-quality control (MQC), and high-quality control (HQC) were less than 7.62%, and the accuracy values were between 100.36% and 105.37%. All data were within acceptable requirements.
The stability analysis of plinabulin in Wistar rat plasma under different conditions is shown in Table 4. The stability under different conditions ranged from 89.23% to 110.58%, with RSD < 11.15%. There was no significant degradation of the plasma samples during treatment and storage.
To verify the dilution effect of plinabulin in Wistar rat plasma, samples were diluted 20-fold with blank rat plasma (Table 5). The RSD (%) and the relative error (RE) (%) ranges of the dilution methods were less than 15%, indicating that the dilution was in accordance with the standards.
The results of the matrix effect and recovery are shown in Table 6. The matrix effect of plinabulin ranged from 94.80% to 100.45% (RSD ≤ 11.28%). The recovery of plinabulin was between 91.99% and 109.75% (RSD ≤ 7.92%). All the RSD values conformed to the criteria. The results demonstrated that the matrix effect of the sample preparation method can be neglected and is not subject to endogenous interference.
At present, no analytical method has been developed for the determination of plinabulin. In this work, we developed a novel UHPLC-MS/MS method that provided a short analysis time of 5 min at a relatively low cost for the determination of plinabulin. Additionally, this assay exhibited good sensitivity, stability, the absence of a matrix effect, high recovery, and good dilution integrity.

2.4. Pharmacokinetics of Plinabulin in Leukopenic Rats

Leukopenia caused by bone marrow suppressive chemotherapy is a common side effect in the clinical treatment of cancer, which can increase the risk of infection in cancer patients [22]. Due to the reduction in leukocytes, the dose of chemotherapy may be reduced, leading to a delay in hospitalization and affecting the treatment effect. Depending on the extent and duration of their reduction, it increased the risk of febrile neutropenia infection [23]. However, the pharmacokinetic profiles could be changed in the leukopenia state [18]. Therefore, it is important to study the pharmacokinetics of plinabulin in the leukopenia state to provide more information for guiding clinical medication plans.
The mean plasma concentration-time profiles for plinabulin are presented in Figure 4. The main pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in Table 7. According to the results, we found that the pharmacokinetic characteristics of plinabulin with intravenous injection showed certain regularity. The results showed that the Cmax (maximum concentration) and AUC (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) of plinabulin increased with increasing doses in the leukopenia and control groups at different doses. The half-lives (t1/2) of the leukopenia group and control group were 0.35–0.81 h, indicating that the elimination of plinabulin was very fast. The mean residence time (MRT) of plinabulin was short (0.35–0.64 h), indicating that plinabulin stayed in the rat body for a short time and was easy to be excreted. At the same dose, the pharmacokinetic parameters of plinabulin in the leukopenia group and control group showed little difference.
When two or more drugs are administered simultaneously or sequentially, the pharmacokinetic profiles of each may be altered due to drug–drug interactions. For example, the Cmax and AUC of bedaquiline with the addition of rifabutin decreased by 38.8% and 65.5%, respectively, compared with those without rifabutin [24]. In recent years, more and more studies have been conducted on the pharmacokinetics of CY. Previous reports have shown that the Cmax of CY is about 2 h after administration, and its half-life varies with different species [25]. In particular, the t1/2 of CY is close to 6 h in humans but less than 2 h in rats, cats, and dogs [26]. In this experiment, plinabulin was administered by intravenous injection 12 h after CY administration, with a half-life interval of more than five times. It means that the residual amount of CY in the body is low and its effect is negligible [26]. Thus, CY does not affect the pharmacokinetics of plinabulin. In our results, there was no significant difference in pharmacokinetics between the leukopenia group and the control group, which was in line with the expected results.

2.5. Dose Proportionality

The method used to assess dose ratios from 0.5 to 3 mg/kg is to compare the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the slope (β1) with a modified acceptance range based on the power model [1 + (ln(θL)/ln(r)), 1 + (ln(θH)/ln(r)] [27]. The current FDA guidance defines θL = 0.80 and θH = 1.25, where θL and θH are the confidence intervals of the lower and upper limits, and r is the maximum dose ratio studied [27,28]. According to references [29,30,31], plots of the power model fit functions for C2min, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞, and the associated 90% confidence intervals of the control and leukocyte groups are given in Figure 5. The results of the evaluation based on the power model are shown in Table 8. The slope (90% CI) of AUC0-t for control groups was 1.386 (0.928, 1.844), the slope of AUC0–∞ was 1.370 (0.954, 1.787), and the slope (90% CI) was 1.252 (0.621, 1.884) for C2min. Using the same algorithm, the slope (90% CI) of AUC0–t for leukopenia groups was 1.351 (1.124, 1.579), the slope of AUC0–∞ was 1.332 (1.197, 1.466), and the slope (90% CI) was 1.322 (0.673, 1.971) for C2min. The results of the statistical analysis showed that the 90% CIs for AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and C2min of the control and the leukopenia groups spanned the acceptance interval (0.875,1.125) defined by the equations for r = 3/0.5, θL = 0.8, and θL = 1.25. Based on the criteria of the power model evaluation [27,32], it can be concluded that the results of the dose ratio for plinabulin intravenous administration showed inconclusive results in the dose range of 0.5–3 mg/kg.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Animals

Plinabulin (purity ≥ 98%) was purchased from Beijing Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Propranolol (purity ≥ 99%, internal standard, IS) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HS-15 was purchased from Shanghai BASF Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and propylene glycol was obtained from Beijing Fengli Jingqiu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) HPLC-grade acetonitrile and HPLC-grade methanol were purchased from Adamas-beta (Shanghai, China). HPLC-grade formic acid was from Fisher, USA. Cyclophosphamide (CY) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Deionized water was from Watsons professional drinking water.
Forty-eight Wistar rats (males, weight 180 ± 20 g) were purchased from Jinan Pengyue Experimental Animal Breeding Co., Ltd. (Shandong, China). The experimental animal production license number is SCXK (Lu) 2022006. All Wistar rats were maintained in the SPF animal room with a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C and a humidity of 60 ± 5% for 12 h light-dark cycles. Animals were allowed to take in rodent food and drink water freely before intravenous administration. The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethical Committee of Ocean University of China (Permit NO. OUC-AE-2022-109, and the date of approval was 7 March 2022).

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Establishment of the Leukopenia Rat Model

On the first and third days of the experiment, rats were intraperitoneally injected with the anticancer drug CY at 50, 70, and 90 mg/kg, respectively, to select the appropriate dose for establishing the leukopenia model. Meanwhile, rats in the control group were intraperitoneally injected with the same volume of saline. Blood (20 μL) was collected at 12 h after the last injection, and the white blood cells (WBCs) were counted by an IDEXX ProCyte Dx Hematology Analyzer (Shanghai IDEXX Laboratories Co., Ltd.) (Shanghai, China).

3.2.2. UHPLC-MS/MS Assay

Sample analysis was performed on an Agilent 1290 system consisting of a G7120A high-speed pump, a G7167B auto-sampler, and a G7116B MCT column oven. Plinabulin and IS were detected by Agilent G6460C electrospray ionization (ESI) triple mass spectrometry. The chromatographic column was Capcell Pak C18 (2.0 × 50 mm, 5 μm) at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of water (A, containing 0.2% (v/v) formic acid) and acetonitrile (B, containing 0.2% (v/v) formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min with a gradient elution procedure as follows: 0–0.5 min, 5% B; 0.5–2.0 min, 5–35% B; 2.0–3.0 min, 35–95% B; 3.0–3.5 min, 95% B; 3.5–3.8 min, 95–5% B; 3.8–5.0 min, 5% B. The volume of injection was 2 μL, and the sample temperature was maintained at 20 °C.
The mass spectrometer was set in a positive ionization pattern under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, and the optimized mass spectrum conditions were as follows: gas temperature: 350 °C; gas flow rate: 11 L/min; sprayer: 30 psi; and capillary voltage: 4 kV. The fragmentor was optimized to 140 V for plinabulin and 132 V for IS. Plinabulin and IS had collision energies of 22 V and 15 V, respectively. The precursor ion and product ion were m/z 337.3 → 309.3 for plinabulin, and m/z 260.2 → 116.0 for IS, respectively.

3.2.3. Standard and Quality Control (QC) Sample Preparations

Working solutions and QC solutions for plinabulin were prepared by dissolving plinabulin into a freshly prepared stock solution of 10 mg/mL with DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and serially diluting the stock solution with 60% acetonitrile. The most ideal internal standard should be the isotopically labeled plinabulin compound. Due to the double bond in the structure of plinabulin, cis-trans isomerization occurs easily under light conditions [33]. Isomerization also occurs in isotopically labeled plinabulin and these isomeric compounds are not stable [34]. Due to its high stability, propranolol has been widely used as a universal internal standard in the analysis of biological samples [35,36,37,38,39]. Hence, to eliminate the systematic error of plinabulin content determination, propranolol was chosen as IS for quantification. Besides high stability, propranolol presents chromatographic properties similar to plinabulin, reinforcing its application as IS in the present study. Propranolol solution with a concentration of 20 ng/mL was prepared with acetonitrile and stored at 4 °C until further analysis.
Ten calibration samples and QC samples were prepared by adding 10 μL of a 10-fold concentration of calibrators to 100 μL blank rat plasma. The mixture was vortexed for 30 s, and concentrations of the ten calibration samples of plinabulin in plasma were 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 ng/mL, respectively. QC samples were prepared at four concentrations of 0.5 ng/mL (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ), 1 ng/mL (low-quality control, LQC), 100 ng/mL (middle-quality control, MQC), and 400 ng/mL (high-quality control, HQC) with independent preparation, and then 200 μL acetonitrile containing IS (20 ng/mL) was added to precipitate protein. After vortexing for 1 min and centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, 100 μL supernatant was transferred into the auto-sampler vials for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis with 2 μL injection volume.

3.2.4. Plasma Sample Preparation

All rat plasma samples were thawed at room temperature before analysis. To a 100 μL plasma sample was added 10 μL 60% acetonitrile, then 200 μL acetonitrile containing IS (20 ng/mL) was added to precipitate protein. The mixture was vortex-mixed for 1 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Finally, 100 μL supernatant was collected into the auto-sampler vials for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis with 2 μL injection volume.

3.2.5. Method Validation

The method was validated according to the guidelines of ICH M10 Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis (24 May 2022) [21].
The selectivity of plinabulin was determined by analyzing the blank rat plasma spiked with plinabulin and IS and rat plasma collected at 15 min after intravenous administration of a 3 mg/kg dose of plinabulin to explore the potential endogenous interference between analytes.
Linearity was evaluated by plotting the plinabulin/IS response ratios versus the concentrations of plinabulin. The calibration curves ranged from 0.5 to 500 ng/mL with ten points fitted y = bx + c by weighting factor 1/x2. Every standard curve solution was freshly prepared in every validation and sample detection. The calibration curves were accepted if R2 > 0.99 (R2, coefficient of determination). The sensitivity was evaluated by LLOQ samples, which was the lowest calibration curve concentration. The RE of LLOQ should be within ±20%, and RSD should not exceed 20%. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was >10.
The accuracy and precision were estimated by six replicates of LLOQ, LQC, MQC, and HQC samples (0.5, 1, 100, and 400 ng/mL, respectively) in intra- and inter-day batches. The accuracy and precision of the inter-day measurements were assessed by investigating three batches of LLOQ, LQC, MQC, and HQC samples on three continuous days. Precision was expressed as a percentage (%) of RSD. The accuracy should be within ±15% for QC samples and within ±20% for LLOQ. The precision should be within 15% for QC samples and within 20% for LLOQ.
The dilution integrity of the bioassay was determined by using blank Wistar rat plasma diluted 20-fold. The RE % and RSD % should be less than 15%.
The extraction recovery was determined by comparing the peak area of plinabulin in the supernatant of rat blank plasma with that of precipitated blank plasma at three QC levels, and each QC sample was set up in 6 replicates. The RSD (%) of the peak area ratio should be less than 15%. The matrix effect was determined by determining the peak area of plinabulin in the supernatant of the precipitated blank rat plasma by acetonitrile (n = 6) with those in 60% acetonitrile at three QC levels. The RSD (%) of the peak area ratio should be less than 15%.
The stability of plinabulin in rat plasma was evaluated by analyzing six replicates of plasma samples at LQC and HQC levels under different storage conditions. The short-term stability was assessed by analyzing the samples in plasma at room temperature for 6 h. LQC and HQC samples were stored at −80 °C for 28 consecutive days to assess long-term stability. The stability of the freeze–thaw cycle was performed by analyzing samples in plasma through three freeze–thaw cycles from −80 °C to room temperature. The stability of processed samples in the auto-sampler was evaluated after maintaining post-preparative samples in the auto-sampler for 24 h. The stability of the samples was evaluated by comparing them with corresponding spiked concentrations of analytes. The RE should be within ±15%, and RSD < 15%.

3.2.6. Pharmacokinetics Study

Thirty-six Wistar rats (18 normal rats and 18 leukopenia rats) were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6 per group). They received 0.5, 1, or 3 mg/kg plinabulin intravenously, respectively. The rats were given free water before intravenous administration. A single dose of plinabulin was administered to each group and an equivalent of 0.3 mL blood sample was collected into heparinized Eppendorf tubes by post-orbital venous sinus before dosing and subsequently at 2 min, 5 min, 15 min, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 10 h after intravenous administration. Blood samples were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were collected. The plasma samples were stored at −20 °C until further analysis. A 100 μL plasma sample was added with 10 μL 60% acetonitrile, then 200 μL acetonitrile containing IS (20 ng/mL) was added to precipitate protein. The mixture was vortex-mixed for 1 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Finally, the supernatants were collected into the auto-sampler vials for UPLC–MS/MS analysis.

3.3. Statistical Analyses

All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was calculated by Microsoft Office Excel 2016. A difference at p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant (marked as *). The higher significance level was set at p < 0.01 (marked as **). The mean plasma concentration-time curves were drawn by Origin 8.0. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by DAS 3.0 (BioGuider Co., Shanghai, China) based on non-compartmental analysis. The dose ratios were assessed by fitting the relationship of the ln-transformed dose-normalized parameters to the ln-transformed dose using a linear regression model [29]. The value of the constant of proportionality β1 and its corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Origin 8.0 software. Dose proportionality was concluded if the plot of pharmacokinetic parameter vs. dose indicated linearity (β1 = 1) and the 90% CI for the slope fell into the acceptance range [27,40].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a sensitive, reproducible, and practical UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of plinabulin in rat plasma and fully validated the method for the first time. The protein precipitation method was simple and acceptable for the recovery of plinabulin. The calibration curve of plinabulin was established in the range of 0.5 (LLOQ) to 500 ng/mL with reproducible intra- and inter-day accuracy and precision. Our UHPLC-MS/MS method has a high sensitivity, a good resolution, a moderate price, and is quite suitable for accurate quantification of plinabulin in pharmacokinetic studies in rats. In this study, we have compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics of plinabulin in normal and leukopenia conditions. The results showed that the pharmacokinetic parameters such as C2min and AUC of plinabulin appeared to be proportional to the dose administered, although they did not meet the statistical criteria for dose proportionality. We did not find any pharmacokinetic difference in plinabulin between the leukopenic and normal groups. It provided some references for the next research and clinical development of plinabulin. Limited by our experimental conditions and other uncontrollable factors, we were unable to explore the detailed mechanism in our study. Next, we plan to study the detailed mechanism of plinabulin pharmacokinetic characteristics in terms of drug–drug interactions and pathological changes in the disease state. We will also explore the relationship between its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics to provide better guidance on the clinical use of plinabulin.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, resources, investigation, writing—review and editing, J.Z.; investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, X.N.; validation, D.C.; data curation, W.H.; supervision, Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethical Committee of Ocean University of China (Permit NO. OUC-AE-2022-109, and the date of approval was 7 March 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate the support and help with animal experiments from laboratory partners.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tonra, J.R.; Lloyd, G.K.; Mohanlal, R.; Huang, L. Plinabulin ameliorates neutropenia induced by multiple chemotherapies through a mechanism distinct from G-CSF therapies. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2020, 85, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sala, G.L.; Olieric, N.; Sharma, A.; Diaz, J.F.; Steinmetz, M.O.; Cavalli, A. Structure, thermodynamics, and kinetics of plinabulin binding to two tubulin isotypes. Chem 2019, 5, 2969–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blayney, D.W.; Mohanlal, R.; Adamchuk, H.; Kirtbaya, D.V.; Chen, M.; Du, L.; Ogenstad, S.; Ginn, G.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Q. Efficacy of plinabulin vs pegfilgrastim for prevention of docetaxel-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumors: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2145446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saeed, A.F.U.H.; Su, J.; Ouyang, S. Marine-derived drugs: Recent advances in cancer therapy and immune signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 134, 111091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bairi, K.E.; Atanasov, A.G.; Amrani, M.; Afqir, S. The arrival of predictive biomarkers for monitoring therapy response to natural compounds in cancer drug discovery. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 2492–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohanlal, R.; Huang, L.; Lloyd, G.K. Composition and Method for Reducing Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia via the Administration of Plinabulin and a g-csf Agent. U.S. Patent 16,966,156, 4 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertelsen, L.B.; Shen, Y.Y.; Nielsen, T.; Stødkilde-Jørgensen, H.; Lloyd, G.K.; Siemann, D.W.; Horsman, M.R. Vascular effects of plinabulin (NPI-2358) and the influence on tumour response when given alone or combined with radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2011, 87, 1126–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ma, M.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, H.; Deng, M.; Ding, Z.; Hou, Y.; Li, F.; Dou, G.; Li, W. In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of MBRI-001, a deuterium-substituted plinabulin derivative as a potent anti-cancer agent. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 4687–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Huang, L. Cancer Treatment with Combination of Plinabulin and Taxane. U.S. Patent 10,596,169, 24 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, H.; Hu, X.; Qiao, M.; Li, Y.; Cao, S.; Ding, L.; Feng, X.; Kang, N.; Zhang, D.; Qiu, F. Simultaneous determination of five isoflavones in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS: Comparative pharmacokinetic characteristics of puerariae lobatae radix in normal and type 2 diabetic rats. J. Sep. Sci. 2019, 42, 2592–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qi, Y.; Cheng, X.; Jing, H.; Yan, T.; Xiao, F.; Wu, B.; Bi, K.S.; Jia, Y. Comparative pharmacokinetic study of the components in Alpinia oxyphylla Miq-Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) baill, herb pair and its single herb between normal and alzheimer’s disease rats by UPLC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 177, 112874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Helsby, N.A.; Yong, M.; Kan, M.; Zoysa, J.R.; Burns, K.E. The importance of both CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 germline variations in cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 85, 1925–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deng, J.; Zhong, Y.F.; Wu, Y.P.; Luo, Z.; Sun, Y.M.; Wang, G.E.; Kurihara, H.; Li, Y.F.; He, R.R. Carnosine attenuates cyclophosphamide-induced bone marrow suppression by reducing oxidative DNA damage. Redox. Biol. 2018, 14, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, D.; Wang, B.; Xu, X.L.; Bu, X.M.; Zhang, M.Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, L.; Shi, N. One-pot derivatization/extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for furfurals determination. Food Chem. 2023, 428, 136839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghanbari, S.; Seidi, S. Fabrication of porous cobalt oxide/carbon nanopolks on electrospun hollow carbon nanofibers for microextraction by packed sorbent of parabens from human blood. J. Chromatogr. A. 2023, 1702, 464080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, L.J.; Chen, L.; Bai, C.F.; Wu, A.G.; Liang, S.C.; Huang, F.H.; Cao, S.S.; Yang, L.; Zou, W.J.; Wu, J.M. A rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ziyuglycoside I and its application in a preliminary pharmacokinetic study in healthy and leukopenic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 123, 109756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, T.S.; Park, E.J.; Choi, M.; Oh, H.S.; An, Y.; Kim, T.; Kim, T.H.; Shin, B.S.; Shin, S. Novel LC-MS/MS analysis of the GLP-1 analog semaglutide with its application to pharmacokinetics and brain distribution studies in rats. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2023, 1221, 123688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ma, Z.; Tang, M.; Pu, Q.; Wei, P.; Wu, R.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ye, H.; Chen, L. UPLC-MS/MS method development and application to pharmacokinetic study in rats and dogs of Flonoltinib Maleat. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2023, 1223, 123696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. FDA. M10 Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis Guidance for Industry. 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/m10-bioanalytical-method-validation-and-study-sample-analysis. (accessed on 24 May 2022).
  22. Lyman, G.H.; Allcott, K.; Garcia, J.; Stryker, S.; Li, Y.; Reiner, M.T.; Weycker, D. The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2017, 25, 2619–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lyman, G.H.; Michels, S.L.; Reynolds, M.W.; Barron, R.; Tomic, K.S.; Yu, J. Risk of mortality in patients with cancer who experience febrile neutropenia. Cancer 2010, 116, 5555–5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Healan, A.M.; Griffiss, J.M.; Proskin, H.M.; O’Riordan, M.A.; Gray, W.A.; Salata, R.A.; Blumer, J.L. Impact of Rifabutin or Rifampin on Bedaquiline safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics assessed in a randomized clinical trial with healthy adult volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00855-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ramirez, D.A.; Collins, K.P.; Aradi, A.E.; Conger, K.A.; Gustafson, D.L. Kinetics of Cyclophosphamide metabolism in humans, dogs, cats, and mice and relationship to cytotoxic activity and pharmacokinetics. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2019, 47, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Adams, L.M.; Johnson, B.; Murray, S. A pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety study of intravenous cyclophosphamide with an oral casopitant antiemetic regimen in cancer patients. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2014, 3, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Smith, B.P.; Vandenhende, F.R.; DeSante, K.A.; Farid, N.A.; Welch, P.A.; Callaghan, J.T.; Forgue, S.T. Confidence interval criteria for assessment of dose proportionality. Pharm. Res. 2000, 17, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hummel, J.; McKendrick, S.; Brindley, C.; French, R. Exploratory assessment of dose proportionality: Review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion. Pharm. Stat. 2009, 8, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sun, J.; Zhang, L.; Song, J.; Tian, S.; Huang, C.; Feng, Z.; Lv, Y.; Du, G. Pharmacokinetic study of salvianolic acid A in beagle dog after oral administration by a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method: A study on bioavailability and dose proportionality. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, J.; Zhang, W.; Sun, J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Feng, Z.; Du, G. Pharmacokinetic study of salvianolic acid D after oral and intravenous administration in rats. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2015, 5, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, C.; Song, X.; Song, J.; Pang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Lian, W.; Liu, A.; Du, G. Pharmacokinetic study of gallocatechin-7-gallate from Pithecellobium clypearia Benth. in rats. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2016, 6, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Karhu, D.; Groenewoud, G.; Potgieter, M.A.; Mould, D.R. Dose proportionality of once-daily trazodone extended-release caplets under fasting conditions. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 50, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, L.; Jennifer, G.; Michael, P. Dehydrophenylazilastine and Its Analogues and the Synthesis of Dehydrophenyl Azilastine and Its Analogues. Chinese Patent CN101633655A, 30 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ding, Z.; Cheng, H.; Wang, S.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Guan, H.; Li, W. Development of MBRI-001, a deuterium-substituted plinabulin derivative as a potent anti-cancer agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 1416–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rub, R.A.; Beg, S.; Kazmi, I.; Afzal, O.; Almalki, W.H.; Alghamdi, S.; Akhter, S.; Ali, A.; Ahmed, F.J. Systematic development of a bioanalytical UPLC-MS/MS method for estimation of risperidone and its active metabolite in long-acting microsphere formulation in rat plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2020, 1160, 122433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Harahap, Y.; Elysia, C.; Starlin, Z.; Jayusman, A.M. Analysis of Acrylamide in dried blood spots of lung cancer patients by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2020, 2020, 2015264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mohammed, M.S.; Hefnawy, M.M.; Al-Majed, A.A.; Alrabiah, H.K.; Algrain, N.A.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Altamimi, A.S.; Bin Jardan, Y.A.; Al-Hossaini, A.M. Development and validation of a chiral liquid chromatographic assay for enantiomeric separation and quantification of verapamil in rat plasma: Stereoselective pharmacokinetic application. Molecules 2021, 26, 2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, T.; Xu, W.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Liu, H.; Yu, P.; Li, W.; Yu, D. Determination of ginsenoside Rh3 in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2022, 36, e5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, D.; Du, K.; Niu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, J. Development and validation of LC-MS/MS method for amlexanox in rat plasma and its application in preclinical pharmacokinetics. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2022, 36, e5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, J.; Seong, S.J.; Lim, M.S.; Park, S.M.; Park, J.; Seo, J.J.; Lee, H.W.; Yoon, Y.R. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of intravenous pazufloxacin mesilate in healthy Korean volunteers. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2012, 8, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g001
Figure 1. The chemical structures of plinabulin and propranolol.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of plinabulin and propranolol.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g001
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g002aPharmaceuticals 16 01153 g002b
Figure 2. The mass spectra of plinabulin (A) and propranolol (B).
Figure 2. The mass spectra of plinabulin (A) and propranolol (B).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g002aPharmaceuticals 16 01153 g002b
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g003
Figure 3. The typical MRM chromatograms of plinabulin and IS in Wistar rat plasma; (A) Wistar rat blank plasma; (B) blank rat plasma spiked with plinabulin and IS at LLOQ; (C) Wistar rat plasma samples collected at 15 min after intravenous injection of plinabulin (3 mg/kg).
Figure 3. The typical MRM chromatograms of plinabulin and IS in Wistar rat plasma; (A) Wistar rat blank plasma; (B) blank rat plasma spiked with plinabulin and IS at LLOQ; (C) Wistar rat plasma samples collected at 15 min after intravenous injection of plinabulin (3 mg/kg).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g003
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g004
Figure 4. The integrated plasma concentration-time profiles of three dosages in each group (n = 6).
Figure 4. The integrated plasma concentration-time profiles of three dosages in each group (n = 6).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g004
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g005
Figure 5. Relationship between systemic exposure and dose after intravenous administration of 0.5 to 3 mg/kg plinabulin in Wistar rats in the control groups and the leukocyte groups. Solid circles are mean observations, solid lines are fits based on power models, and dashed lines are 90% CI. (A) AUC0–t in the control groups; (B) AUC0–∞ in the control groups; (C) C2min in the control groups; (D) AUC0–t in the leukocyte groups; (E) AUC0–∞ in the leukocyte groups; (F) C2min in the leukocyte groups.
Figure 5. Relationship between systemic exposure and dose after intravenous administration of 0.5 to 3 mg/kg plinabulin in Wistar rats in the control groups and the leukocyte groups. Solid circles are mean observations, solid lines are fits based on power models, and dashed lines are 90% CI. (A) AUC0–t in the control groups; (B) AUC0–∞ in the control groups; (C) C2min in the control groups; (D) AUC0–t in the leukocyte groups; (E) AUC0–∞ in the leukocyte groups; (F) C2min in the leukocyte groups.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01153 g005
Table 1. The levels of white blood cells of blank rats and rats treated with CY (n = 6).
Table 1. The levels of white blood cells of blank rats and rats treated with CY (n = 6).
GroupNumbersWBCs (109/L)
Control610.19 ± 4.42
CY 50 mg/kg63.40 ± 0.67 **
CY 70 mg/kg62.02 ± 0.64 **
CY 90 mg/kg61.29 ± 0.18 **
** p < 0.01 vs. control.
Table 2. The typical standard curves of plinabulin (n = 3) in rat plasma.
Table 2. The typical standard curves of plinabulin (n = 3) in rat plasma.
BatchInterceptSlopeR2
10.0416140.9793210.9969
20.0184140.9122910.9962
30.0167610.8838530.9967
Table 3. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy for plinabulin in rat plasma.
Table 3. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy for plinabulin in rat plasma.
Spiked Concentration (ng/mL)Measured Concentration (ng/mL)
(Mean ± SD, n = 6)		Overall MeanIntra-DayInter-DayRE
Batch 1Batch 2Batch 3(ng/mL)RSD (%)RSD (%)(%)
LLOQ0.50.49 ± 0.020.54 ± 0.050.55 ± 0.070.539.4215.955.37
LQC11.02 ± 0.071.05 ± 0.101.07 ± 0.061.047.625.824.41
MQC100100.15 ± 4.88105.90 ± 2.83105.29 ± 1.37103.783.237.453.78
HQC400396.53 ± 10.40399.99 ± 8.66407.83 ± 1.79401.451.963.530.36
Table 4. Stability of plinabulin in rat plasma under various storage conditions (n = 6).
Table 4. Stability of plinabulin in rat plasma under various storage conditions (n = 6).
Stability ConditionsConcentration (ng/mL)Mean ± SD (ng/mL)RSD (%)RE (%)
Room temperature for 6 h11.05 ± 0.076.435.45
400395.94 ± 11.963.02−1.01
Long-term for 28 days (−80 °C)11.11 ± 0.1211.1510.58
400356.94 ± 12.023.37−10.77
Three freeze–thaw cycles11.01 ± 0.076.851.40
400411.99 ± 12.112.943.00
Auto-sampler for 24 h (10 °C)11.07 ± 0.065.447.46
400419.94 ± 13.503.214.99
Table 5. The results of dilution integrity (n = 6).
Table 5. The results of dilution integrity (n = 6).
Concentration (ng/mL)Dilution RatiosMean ± SDRSD (%)RE (%)
5000204872.28 ± 79.301.63−2.55
Table 6. Matrix effect and recovery of plinabulin in rat plasma (n = 6).
Table 6. Matrix effect and recovery of plinabulin in rat plasma (n = 6).
Concentration (ng/mL)Matrix EffectRecovery Rate
Mean ± SD (%)RSD (%)Mean ± SD (%)RSD (%)
194.80 ± 9.7010.23100.63 ± 7.977.92
100100.45 ± 3.043.03109.75 ± 4.504.10
40097.53 ± 11.0011.2891.99 ± 2.873.12
Table 7. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plinabulin in normal and leukopenic rats (Mean ± SD, n = 6).
Table 7. Pharmacokinetic parameters of plinabulin in normal and leukopenic rats (Mean ± SD, n = 6).
ParametersNormal RatsLeukopenic Rats
0.5 mg/kg1 mg/kg3 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg1 mg/kg3 mg/kg
AUC0–t (h·μg/L)121.75 ± 31.56272.06 ± 42.851337.12 ± 193.56148.89 ± 78.74318.15 ± 40.001432.43 ± 197.47
AUC0–∞ (h·μg/L)124.755 ± 32.76278.94 ± 43.151337.62 ± 193.49149.80 ± 79.09327.56 ± 35.401432.97 ± 197.55
t1/2 (h)0.39 ± 0.040.41 ± 0.030.70 ± 0.120.57 ± 0.290.49 ± 0.04 *0.72 ± 0.09
CL (L/h/kg)4.23 ± 1.053.66 ± 0.542.29 ± 0.353.87 ± 1.313.08 ± 0.342.13 ± 0.33
Vd (L/kg)2.37 ± 0.582.14 ± 0.352.30 ± 0.452.75 ± 0.382.19 ± 0.392.19 ± 0.26
MRT (h)0.40 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.050.86 ± 0.750.45 ± 0.060.60 ± 0.04
C2min340.30 ± 122.59948.06 ± 233.853400.53 ± 735.75298.41 ± 56.52900.05 ± 129.183443.13 ± 420.59
* p < 0.05 vs. normal rats.
Table 8. Assessment of dose proportionality of plinabulin based on the power model.
Table 8. Assessment of dose proportionality of plinabulin based on the power model.
GroupsParameters Acceptance Rangeβ1 90% Confidence Interval
Control groupsAUC0–t0.875–1.1251.3860.928–1.844
AUC0–∞0.875–1.1251.3700.954–1.787
C2min0.875–1.1251.2520.621–1.884
Leukopenia groupsAUC0–t0.875–1.1251.3511.124–1.579
AUC0–∞0.875–1.1251.3321.197–1.466
C2min0.875–1.1251.3220.673–1.971
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, X.; Chen, D.; He, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, J. Development and Validation of a Novel UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Plinabulin in Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study with Leukopenic Rats. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081153

AMA Style

Niu X, Chen D, He W, Tang Y, Zhao J. Development and Validation of a Novel UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Plinabulin in Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study with Leukopenic Rats. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(8):1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Xiaochen, Dan Chen, Wei He, Yu Tang, and Jianchun Zhao. 2023. "Development and Validation of a Novel UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Plinabulin in Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study with Leukopenic Rats" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 8: 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop