Next Article in Journal
MD Simulations to Calculate NMR Relaxation Parameters of Vanadium(IV) Complexes: A Promising Diagnostic Tool for Cancer and Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
The Chemoprevention Effects of Two Herbal Mixtures on Chemically Induced Lung Tumorigenesis in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Triphenylphosphine Derivatives of Allylbenzenes Express Antitumor and Adjuvant Activity When Solubilized with Cyclodextrin-Based Formulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Chemopreventive Effects of Dietary Combination of Phytochemicals against Cancer Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Molecules in Cancer Therapeutics

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(12), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121652
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 20 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 26 November 2023

Abstract

:
Phytochemicals are natural plant-derived products that provide significant nutrition, essential biomolecules, and flavor as part of our diet. They have long been known to confer protection against several diseases via their anti-inflammatory, immune-regulatory, anti-microbial, and several other properties. Deciphering the role of phytochemicals in the prevention, inhibition, and treatment of cancer—unrestrained cell proliferation due to the loss of tight regulation on cell growth and replication—has been the focus of recent research. Particularly, the immunomodulatory role of phytochemicals, which is pivotal in unchecked cell proliferation and metastasis, has recently been studied extensively. The immune system is a critical component of the tumor microenvironment, and it plays essential roles in both preventing and promoting oncogenesis. Immunomodulation includes stimulation, amplification, or inactivation of some stage(s) of the immune response. Phytochemicals and their products have demonstrated immune regulation, such as macrophage migration, nitric oxide synthase inhibition, lymphocyte, T-cell, and cytokine stimulation, natural killer cell augmentation, and NFκB, TNF, and apoptosis regulation. There is a dearth of extensive accounts of the immunomodulatory effects of phytochemicals in cancer; thus, we have compiled these effects with mechanistic aspects of dietary phytochemicals in cancer, highlighting promising candidates and ongoing clinical trials on immunotherapeutic strategies to mitigate oncogenesis.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a disease of abnormal and unchecked cell growth and proliferation, and it remains the second leading cause of substantial mortality and morbidity rates worldwide [1,2,3,4,5]. According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 609,360 people died due to various form of cancers, with around 1.9 million new cancer cases reported in 2022 [5]. As cancer involves unchecked cell growth, a prominent aspect of cancer prevention and treatment is modulating the immune response. Refurbishing the immune system to defeat and minimize the chances of cancer recurrence is essential in cancer treatment [6,7]. The immune system is the key component responsible for proper cell growth and proliferation while controlling metastasis [8]. Experiments have shown that the immune system can react to experimentally induced tumors in animal models. Thus, it can be concluded that the host cell immunological network can modulate malignant cells [9,10]. Research shows that immunotherapeutic manipulation can control the spread of tumors of almost all types [11].
Local interventions and systemic therapies, like surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal therapy, and other targeted therapies, are common approaches to augment the immune system for treating cancer. Chemotherapy is a major consideration, and is one of the most widely used treatments in both early and advanced stages of cancer; however, due to its highly cytotoxic nature and other severe side effects, new approaches with minimal iniquitous effects are warranted [12]. A successful shift towards phytochemicals may diminish the side effects and be cost-effective, thus, playing an important role in the socio-economic sustainability of cancer therapeutics as well. Research endeavors are focused on understanding the drawbacks of modern chemotherapies, reevaluating and rediscovering the anticancer role of traditional medicine and phytochemical substitutes (natural products) that are safer to use and are on the rise [13]. Various clinical trials are underway to assess potent phytochemicals with anticancer and immunomodulatory effects for the comprehensive therapy of specific types of cancer [13].
Phytochemicals encompass a broad range of natural compounds obtained from flora or plant products, such as carotenoids, phenolics, alkaloids, nitrogen and sulfur-containing compounds, to name a few [14]. Since ancient times, plant sources have been an integral part of our diet owing to their nutritional and medicinal values. Enormous volumes of evidence show that phytochemicals can diminish the risk of several chronic diseases and conditions involving a large immunological component, including, but not limited to, cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and arthritis [15,16,17]. Therefore, the intake of phytochemicals such as curcumin, quercetin, flavonoids, luteolin, apigenin lycopene, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), resveratrol, curcuminoid, silibinin, and soybean in the diet may be more useful for cancer prevention. The anticancer effect, along with reduced side effects, immunomodulatory functions, and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals, make them a more considerable preventive measure against cancer initiation and recurrence.
There are several advantages to including phytochemicals as an essential part of the diet. The foremost is the ease of administration, particularly for palatable compounds in their natural form, such as fruits, raw vegetables, nuts, or as part of cuisine, such as spices, oils, herbs, or processed forms such as vines, non-alcoholic beverages, and chocolate. Routine and mindful intake of phytochemicals can have cancer-preventive properties. Additionally, the consumption of whole bio-products has been shown to be more effective than the isolation of one or a few active compounds. For example, bitter guard juice is more effective in preventing pancreatic cancer [18], and whole fermented rice bran is more effective in preventing colon cancer [19]. This review focuses on selected phytochemicals that can be administered orally or consumed as part of the diet, containing anticancer and immunomodulatory properties to fight against a vast variety of cancer and the mechanistic aspects of immunological regulation by these phytochemicals.

2. Phytochemicals: History and Classification

Phytochemicals are biologically active natural compounds derived from plants (Greek word, phyto, meaning plants) that provide macro- and micronutrients to humans [20]. In plants, they are responsible for providing aroma, color, taste, and protecting against environmental hazards and pathogenic attack [21]. Phytochemicals may be available in the form of secondary plant metabolites, known for their nutritive and protective role in human health [22]. Phytochemicals have been in existence since the emergence of plants, and their active roles have been known since ancient times. However, knowledge of the chemistry of compounds conferring medicinal properties to phytochemicals was gained a few hundred years ago. The earliest records of herbal medicines goes back to around 2800 BC, written by the Chinese emperor Shen Nung in “The Great Native Herbal,” and it gives an account of cancer treatment through immunomodulation [23]. Ancient Indian literature also shows the use of medicinal plants in the form of Ayurveda, for tumor management via inflammation and immune response management [24]. Later, this medicinal knowledge was brought to Egypt and Europe, first by Hippocrates (460–377 BC) and then by Aristotle (384–322 BC) [25]. The journey of medicinal plants, i.e., utilizing plant product(s) as a source of medicine, began in 28 A.D. by Greek physicians, as indicated in De Materia Medica [26]. Later, salicin, isolated from the same willow tree, was used as an anti-inflammatory and pain-relieving drug [27]. During the 1980s, many laboratories started to identify phytochemicals as medicines. Medicinal plants from traditional sources have been increasingly used for the search of new drugs. After decades of active use as traditional medicine (herbal preparation), the isolation of the first phytochemicals, i.e., alkaloids (quinine, morphine, strychnine), was successful in the early 19th century, which started a new era for research on dietary and medicinal plants [23]. Phytochemicals are known to possess several biological properties such as anti-microbial activity, repair of cells, antioxidant properties, and the inhibition of different cancer growths [28]. Phytochemicals are mainly present in fruits, seeds, roots, stems, leaves, and flowers [29].
There are no strict classification guidelines for phytochemicals. One way to classify them is according to their functional in plant metabolism; phytochemicals are classified as primary and secondary metabolites. Primary metabolites are necessary for plant life and include carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and their building blocks. Secondary metabolites are the remaining plant chemicals produced through the metabolism of primary metabolites by cellular activity. The most common classes of phytochemicals according to their chemical structural identity are phenolics (45%), terpenoids and steroids (27%), alkaloids (18%), and other chemicals (10%) [30]. A brief overview of these phytochemical classifications is provided below.

2.1. Phenolics

Phenolic phytochemicals are the largest group of phytochemicals present in the plant kingdom [31]. They have a hydroxyl group (-OH) with a covalently bonded aromatic hydrocarbon group, for example, C6H5OH (phenol). They form a diverse group that includes hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids. These are secondary metabolites synthesized by the phenylpropanoid, shikimate, and pentose phosphatase pathways in plants. Polyphenols are present in various parts of plants and play important role in growth, pigmentation, structure, and defense [32]. Within this group, the most important dietary phenolics are flavonoids, phenolic acids, and polyphenolic amides. The structural background, dietary source, and medical plant source of the most studied flavonoids and phenolic acids are listed in Table 1.

2.2. Terpenoids

Terpenoids are a major class of secondary metabolites that contain carbon backbones made of isoprene (2-methylbuta-1,3-diene) units [38]. The generic name “terpene” means hydrocarbons found in turpentine, and the suffix “ene” means the presence of an olefinic bond (containing two isoprene units, hence ten carbon atoms) [39]. Terpenoids are produced by a wide variety of plants, animals, and microorganisms, and their roles in living organisms can be grouped as functional, defensive, and communicative [40]. Based on the isoprene units, terpenoids are divided into various groups such as hemiterpenoids, monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes, and tetraterpenoids [41]. The major dietary and medicinal sources of terpenoids are stated in Table 2. Among the various groups of terpenoids, diterpenoids are mainly used for cancer therapy [42].

2.3. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are natural secondary metabolites derived from plants, fungi, and animals (~3000 distinct alkaloids have been characterized) [45]. They are low molecular weight heterocyclic nitrogenous compounds (with one or more nitrogen atoms present as part of a ring of atom called a cyclic system), which are colorless, crystalline, non-volatile and have low toxicity with higher stability [46]. They are further classified according to the amino acids from which they are derived in the biosynthetic pathway. The major classes of alkaloids are pyrrolidine, pyridine-piperidine, quinoline, isoquinoline, and pyrrolidine-pyridine, as stated in Table 3. Alkaloids are mainly used by plants for defense against microorganisms and insects by producing allelopathically active chemicals [47]. Alkaloids have a restraining effect on the topoisomerase enzyme, leading to stalled DNA replication and cell death, and have various pharmacological activities, including anti-cancer properties, apart from anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory effects [48]. Alkaloids derived from plants have significant efficacy in the suppression of oncogenesis.

3. Cancer Microenvironment: Immunological Milieu

The microenvironment of normal healthy cells incudes immune cells, fibroblasts, blood and lymphatic vessels, and interstitial extracellular matrix [59]. This cellular machinery plays a central role in maintaining tissue homeostasis and functions as a barrier to tumorigenesis [60]. Aberrant signaling from messengers such as chemokines, cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lipid mediators, indicating a polarized microenvironment and altered tissue homeostasis, may initiate/promote tumorigenesis and growth. However, the actual underlying mechanisms for oncogenesis, particularly owing to immune responses, are not well elucidated for most cancer types. The tumor microenvironment (TME) contains both malignant and nonmalignant cells, where non-malignant cells bear the initial tumor-promoting role. The ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis provides significant insights into the relationship of the TME and malignant tumor, where TME is the ‘soil’ and is crucial for the tumor or ‘seed’ to germinate and further grow [61]. Tumors do not resemble malignant cells of only one type but are complex organoids where various cells are recruited and transformed [62]. TME, along with malignant cells, contains various immune cells, tumor vasculature, fibroblasts, lymphatics, pericytes, and adipocytes [63]. The TME initially primes the immune system by the infiltration of immune cells that send chemical signals masking tumor antigens, thus protecting the cancerous cells [64]. At the cancer site, stromal cells release various mediators and cytokines to participate in immune regulation.

3.1. Overview of the Immune System in Cancer

The immune system is an association of complex networks of specialized molecules, cells, tissues, and organs that provides defense from foreign pathogens, aberrant cells, and tumors. The main physiological function of the immune system is to distinguish between “self”, “non-self,” and “altered-self” structures or transformed cells [65]. Cells of the immune system are derived from hematopoietic stem cells by hematopoiesis, belonging to either the lymphoid lineage (B and T cells, natural killer [NK] cells, and innate lymphoid cells) or the myeloid lineage (granulocytes, basophils, eosinophils, neutrophils, monocytes-macrophages, and dendritic cells [DCs]) [65]. Molecules that can be recognized by the immune system are considered antigens, and are generally presented on the surface of target cells [66]. Based on antigen specificity, effector responses, and kinetics of activation, the immune system is divided into two distinct components: innate and adaptive immunity [67]. The immune system acquires the ability to recognize, detect, and eliminate different tumors, even though the human body is not completely resistant to cancer [68]. Moreover, tumor cells are regulated by a dynamic process called immunoediting [69]. During this process, innate and adaptive immune cells are triggered by inflammation in the tumor, recruiting immune cells to the arising tumor and synthesizing cytokines and chemokines. The functions of innate and adaptive immune responses in cancer are important for understanding the effect of phytochemicals on cancer and are detailed below.

3.1.1. Innate Immune Response in Cancer

The innate immune system, also known as the natural immune system, recognizes foreign pathogens or non-self-structures based on receptors encoded in the germline known as pattern recognition receptors [70,71]. Innate immunity is the first line of defense in the body [72]. It plays a critical role in cancer, as innate immune cells can directly interact with tumor cells for elimination [73]. NK cells are principally responsible for killing MHC-lacking cancer cells. Upon activation of stimulatory receptors, NK cells express inflammatory cytokines such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and perforins, activating the apoptotic pathway in tumor cells [74]. IFN-γ can also interact with other receptors on tumor cells via Fas ligand, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and lymphotoxin alpha, which in turn enables apoptosis [75,76]. NK cells have two subtypes: one population expressing CD56dim, CD16bright, and the other CD56bright, CD16dim surface proteins [77]. The population with high CD16 expression shows cytotoxic properties, whereas low expression shows immunoregulatory properties for killing tumor cells without immunization [78]. Apart from these receptors, NK cell activity is modulated by several cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, and IL-2 [65,67,79,80,81,82]. Apart from this, innate cells such as NK cells, DCs, and lymphoid cells have an important function of presenting antigens to T cells through major histocompatibility (MHC), connecting the link between the innate and adaptive immune systems [83] and discovering trained immunity.
Tumor cells enhance the expression of chemical messengers such as chemokine C-C motif ligand (CCL)-2, CCL28, CCL18, TGFβ, cycloxygenase-2, prostaglandins, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-13, and human leukocyte antigen G [84]. These secretary proteins recruit immune suppressor cells, TregS, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mast cells, NK and NKT cells, tumor-associated DCs that aggregate around the tumor and inhibit immune surveillance, as shown in Figure 1. MDSCs are intermediate cell types between myeloid progenitors and terminally differentiate cells, functionally known for their suppressive activity towards T cells [85]. However, there persist some reports that MDSCs may not be a distinct class or intermediate subtype, with functions overlapping with neutrophils. The role of MDSCs, their functional and antigen presentation properties, as well as their functions in the TME, are reviewed in detail by Engblom et al. [86].
The pleiomorphic nature of cytokines in the TME contributes to promoting cancer cell proliferation, bypassing apoptosis, inducing EMT of cancer cells, and facilitates tumor tolerance, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [87]. Angiogenic processes depend on the tight coordination and balance between positive and negative modulators through the action of various molecules, enzymes, cellular junction proteins, and various adhesion receptors [88]. Tumor angiogenesis downregulates as well as shift the balance from negative to positive regulators [89]. This process involves sequential effects that primarily include endothelial cell sprouting, loss of mural cell-endothelial cell association, increased vascular permeability and density [90]. Recent studies have implicated tumor-infiltrating immune cells as crucial mediators of cancer initiation and progression [91]. The inflammatory response triggered by immune cells finally leads to enhanced endothelial cell activation, proliferation, and vascular burgeon [92]. These immune cells comprise cells of both innate and adaptive immunity. The innate cells consist of macrophages, granulocytes, mast cells, NK cells, and DCs. Within these cells, mast cells and macrophages recruit additional leucocytes by secreting soluble cytokines and chemokines and recruit T cells and B cells resulting in an immune response, as stated in Figure 2A, which finally contributes to tumor progression and affect its therapy.
Macrophages are another cell type of innate immunity that counter tumor cells. Tumor cells are known to express surface molecules like phosphatidylserine and low-density lipoproteins, which boost the activation of macrophage-induced phagocytosis [93]. Within the TME, TAMs influence tumor progression, extracellular matrix remodeling, proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. Macrophages are mainly of two types: M1 and M2, which play a role in the polarization of Th1 and Th2 T cells, respectively [94]. Activation of M1 enhances the production of IL-12, IL-23, ROS, and NO [95]. M2, on the other hand, enhance stimulation of IL-4, IL-13, IL-1, IL-10, CCL18 and CCL22, dectin-1, CD206, toll-like receptor (TLR)-1, TLR-6, and TLR-7 [96], scavenger receptor A, scavenger receptor B-1, CD163, CCR2, CXCR1,CXCR2 and DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin, as shown in Figure 1 [97,98,99]. Different factors influence the M1 to M2 polarization, such as interferon regulatory factor (IrF), NFκB, STATs, hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), and Kruppel-like transcription factor [100]. For example, in the case of melanoma cells, melanomas exosomes produce HIF-1α and HIF-2α in M1 and M2 macrophages, respectively. Higher counts of TAMs are detected in different types of tumors. In malignant mammary tumors, CD206 expressing M2 macrophage infiltration is higher, whereas in benign tumors, infiltration of M1 is found higher, but within TME, there is a phenotyping shift for macrophages from M1 to M2, leading to cancer progression [101]. Various reports have indicated that pro-inflammatory cytokines released by M1-macrophages inhibit the proliferation of tumors, whereas M2-associated cytokines are involved in tumor growth [102,103]. Wang Y et al. showed that IL-12 within TME can promote macrophage from M2 to M1 to overcome tumors [104]. The inflammatory cytokine IL-6 is critical to polarize M2 through the mTOR signaling complex 2 (mTORC2) and Akt, promoting tumor growth and metastasis [105]. Various research findings highly suggest M2-macrophages’ negative role in TME; thus, M2 polarization inhibition can stop tumor progression [106].
DCs can interact with tumor cells through integrins and other receptors, finally leading to the phagocytosis of apoptotic cancer cells. Furthermore, DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells, which play crucial role in interlinking innate and adaptive immunity [107]. DCs are abundantly present in TME in various cancers such as lungs, breast, head and neck, colorectal, renal bladder, ovarian, and gastric [108]. Tumor burden is directly linked with the number of DCs in various cancers; for example, in ovarian cancer, as the tumor progresses, the number of tumors infiltrating DCs increases [109]. Within TME, DCs switch from immune stimulatory to immune suppressive DCs with the upregulation of immune suppressive molecules and decrease of T cell infiltration [109]. Sisirak et al. showed that in breast cancer, DCs are associated with worse prognosis. They show a poor response to TLR stimulation in respect to antigen presentation, as well as low IFN production and sustained FOXP3+ Treg expansion [110].

3.1.2. Adaptive Immune Response in Cancer

In comparison to the innate immune presenting system, the adaptive immune system is a slower immune response but is more specific in nature [111]. Thus, adaptive immunity is an important power line of defense with immunological memory and high specificity. The effector functions of the adaptive immune system are mediated by the expression of specialized receptors such as B cell receptor and T cell receptor. During the process of development, these receptors undergo somatic recombination; as a result, diverse antigens have the capacity to bind to these receptors [112]. The important hallmark of B and T cells is, upon antigen recognition, they can undergo the process of clonal selection, which facilitates the eradication of threats [65]. The key cells in this group are T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes [113]. B-lymphocytes are antigen-presenting cells, which have the ability to neutralize, agglutinate foreign cells, precipitate serum antigens, and activate the complement to produce antibodies [114]. The T-lymphocytes, on the other hand, can produce several types of cytokines, which are important activators of other immune cells. Adaptive immune cells mainly interact with tumor cells via tumor antigens by antigen presentation to eliminate tumors [115]. The TME is densely packed with infiltrating CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, CD4+ helper T cells, and FOXP3+ regulatory lymphocytes in various cancers such as bladder [116], renal [117], ovarian [118], prostate [119], skin, and various solid tumors [120]. Activation of T cells is regulated by specific MHC molecules in coordination with ligands of their costimulatory molecules like CD40, ICOS, GITR, OX40, and 4-IBB [121]. In addition, various cytokines such as IL-2, IL-10, IL-15, IL-17, and TGFβ play a role in T-cell function for its antitumor response [122,123]. Within TEM, CD4+ helper T cells are critical cells that are important in the recognition of neoantigens and interaction with DCs through CD40L enhancing CD8+ T cell priming and activation [124,125]. CD4+ T cells, in the presence of TGFβ and IL-10, can differentiate into inducible Treg cells, which are a subset of CD4+ T cells; within different tumors, they suppress antitumor properties of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells leading to poor prognosis and increased tumor growth (152). Research has shown that Tregs infiltrating tumors also have inhibitory molecule expression, such as CTLA-4, PD-1, and LAG-3, compared to peritumoral Tregs [121]. Cytokines IL-12 and IL-6, on the other hand, can inhibit the effector function of CTLs against tumors as well as stimulate the role of Tregs [126]. In addition, Tregs inhibit the function of most immune cells present in TEM like macrophages (promote M2 phenotype), NK cells, DCs, B cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and produce immune suppressant molecules like IL-1, ROS, VEGF, and TGFβ [127,128,129]. In respect to other subsets, CD8+ T cells infiltrating TME have shown to reduce tumor progression with their enhanced ability to produce IFN-γ (pro-inflammatory cytokine) [130,131]. IFN-γ shows an array of functions such as differentiation of T cells to Th1 cells, differentiation of CTLs to effector CTLs, inhibition of angiogenesis, promotion of adaptive immunity, and induction of anti-metastatic activity of IL-12 [132,133,134]. Tumor cells, on the other hand, can regulate T cell function where it decreases the IFN-γ release, producing immune escape mediators like STAT3, PD-L1, and IDO1 [134,135,136].

4. Role of Phytochemicals in Modulating Immune Functions in Cancer

Phytochemicals have remarkable anti-cancer properties that have been demonstrated at both in vitro and in vivo levels. Phytochemicals confer protection from malignancy through scavenging free radicals, reducing invasion and angiogenesis, and suppressing proliferation of tumor cells [137]. In addition, they show their activity on different molecular targets, membrane receptors, kinases, tumor activator proteins, transcriptional factors, cyclins, caspases, microRNAs, and signal transduction pathways [91].

4.1. Regulation of the Innate Immune Response in Cancer by Phytochemicals

Phytochemicals have a great ability to modulate the immune response by regulating immune cells. Several phytochemicals, alone or in combination, are crucial in the stimulation, activation, and maintenance of T cell and NK cell cytotoxicity. Silibinin has been shown to increase the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and neutrophils but decrease macrophage and MDSCs cell numbers in 4T1 luciferase-transfected mammary cancer in female BALB/c and CB17-Prkdc Scid/J mice [138]. Quercetin-triggered NK cell-mediated tumor cell apoptosis through the NKG2D-activating receptor in quercetin-treated K562, SNU1, and SCN-C4 cells, also affected the Th1/Th2 ratio in tumors [139]. Apigenin increases CD4+, CD8+ T cell numbers and reduces suppressive Treg cell numbers in mice [140].
Fraker et al. showed that the oral administration of retinol in wild-type BALB/c and congenitally athymic BALB/c mice can enhance the cytotoxic activity of NK cells in the spleen within an hour of treatment [141]. The enhanced activity is associated with increased expression of the retinoic acid early-inducible gene, and its products act as ligands for the NK cell surface receptor NKG2D [142]. Phytochemicals are not only involved in cytotoxic activity but also play a role in NK cell maturation and increase the expression of activating receptors of NKp46, NKp30, NKp44, NKG2D CD69, and CD25 and IFN-γ and downregulate the inhibitory receptor CD158, in both in vitro and in vivo mouse studies [143,144]. Isoflavone (genistein), even at low concentrations (0.5–1.0 μmol/L), enhances NK cell degranulation and its activity in vitro [145,146].
Curcumin shows immunomodulatory effect upon nitric oxide (NO) production by NK cells as well as macrophages causing cytotoxicity against tumor cells like in AK-5, YAC-1, and breast tumor exosomes [147,148]. Fiala et al. showed that curcumin, in combination with omega-3 fatty acid, enhances NK cell-mediated apoptosis by inhibiting NFκB signaling in pancreatic cancer both in vivo and in vitro [149]. In-depth immunological studies revealed that generally tumor cells decrease the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and inhibit T-cell functions to escape from immune surveillance [8]. Curcumin was also shown to inhibit immunosuppressive Treg cell functions, downregulate IL-10 and TGFβ secretion, and modulate the macrophage and DC cell functions in both in vitro and in vivo models [150].
Phenolic compounds, like resveratrol, showed increased toxic effects against various cancer cell lines such as leukemia (K562), human promyeloblastic leukemia (KG-1a), HepG2, and A549 [151]. The mechanism of toxicity was correlated with an increase in phosphorylation of JNK, ERK-1/2, and RK1/2 MAP kinase activity, perforin, NKG2D, and IFN-γ upregulation, TRAIL pathway activation, CD107a expression, CD8+- and CD4+-T-cells stimulation, and inhibition of constitutively active signal transducers and activators of STAT3 signaling [152,153,154]. The TRAIL pathway has been shown to mediate apoptotic cell death in various cancers, such as human prostate carcinoma, breast, colon, skin, and neuroblastoma both in vitro and in vivo studies, as shown in Table 4 [155,156,157,158,159].
Phytochemicals also regulate macrophages to achieve anti-tumor activity, not only by inhibiting HIF-1α and HIF-2α but also by maintaining a proper balance in M1 and M2 polarization [177]. The polyphenolic compound resveratrol, in humans (PBMCs), has been shown to trigger pro-inflammatory signaling in macrophages [178]. In M1 cells, it stops the increase of pro-inflammatory molecules by downregulation of CD16 and upregulation of metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, whereas in M2 cells, it stops the increase of proangiogenic molecules by upregulation of CD14, MMP-2, and MMP-9 and downregulation of endocytosis, as shown in Figure 1 [178]. Fenretinide, a derivative of retinoic acid, has been shown to inhibit M2 macrophage polarization in colon cancer in APC min/+ transgenic mice, with an adverse impact on cancer attenuation [179]. IL-4, IL-13, CD206, Fizz1, and PPARγ protein levels are blocked by fenretinide, which finally inhibits M2 polarization without any effect on M1 polarization. Cannabinoids can modulate macrophage activity by reducing the expression of TNFα and IL-1β, suggesting its anticancer potential in xenograft tumors for colorectal cancer cells (HTC116, SW480, SW620, and HT29) [162,180]. Echinacea, on the other hand, enhances cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-1, IFN-β), activates macrophages by increasing the expression of CD80, CD86, MHCII molecules, and phagocytosis in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages [165,181].
Other crucial innate cells interacting with the tumor cell are DCs. Curcumin treatment in male C57BL/6 mice strongly downregulates CD80, CD86, and MHC class II expression, but not MHC class I expression on DCs. The DCs also exhibit impaired IL-12 expression and pro-inflammatory cytokine production (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα). Apigenin treatment leads to low expression of PD-L1 in DCs, resulting in enhanced T cell immunity in the melanoma xenograft mouse model and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [182].

4.2. Regulation of Adaptive Immunity in Cancer by Phytochemicals

Phytochemicals have a strong effect on B cell and T cell populations and play integral regulatory roles in maintaining and enhancing the adaptive immune response. In vivo studies with mice inoculated with Ehrlich’s ascites mammary carcinoma (EAC) have shown that phytochemicals such as curcumin, even at low doses, increase T cell population, decrease tumor growth, increase cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells with an increase in IFN-γ release, and increase in CD4+ T cell and B cell populations [183,184]. Phytochemicals have also been shown to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by activating the apoptosis pathway and caspase-3 activity via inactivation of PI3 kinase targets such as GSK3, AKT, FOXO, and PARP degradation [185], as shown in Figure 2. Shao et al. showed that bisdemethoxycurcumin can suppress bladder cancer by enhancing CD8+ T cell infiltration in the TME and increasing the level of IFN-γ by reducing the MDSC population in salivary gland tumor cells in BALB-neuT mice [186,187]. They have also shown that MDSCs, on one hand, reduce IL-6 while on the other hand, induce IL-12, enhancing the CD4+ T and CD8+ T response. Additionally, curcumin inhibits the Treg suppressive activity by inhibiting IL-2 secretion and decreasing Foxp3 expression [188].
Rocaglamides act as immunosuppressive phytochemicals by inhibiting the production of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-γ in T cells circulating in peripheral blood [189]. Garlic extract, which contains various phytochemicals such as allicin, alliin, diallyl disulfate, diallyl trisulfide, ajoene, and s-allyl cystine, was shown to increase the ratio of CD4+/CD8+, enhance the production of IFN-γ in splenocyte of fibroblast tumors, and increase IFN- γ, IL-2, IL-4 levels in breast cancer in Wistar rats [161]. This overall increase in Th1 and Th2 response promoted lymphocyte proliferation [161]. Kis et al. have shown that cannabinoids have a protective role in cancers of various regions, including breast, lung, colon, prostate, skin, and brain, by enhancing the effect of T cells and decreasing the production of T-helper 2 cytokines such as IL-10 in female athymic nude mice xenograft tumors with MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, DU-145, CaCo-2, and AGS, as shown in Table 4 [162]. Tinospora cordifolia greatly affects the proliferation of B-lymphocytes and T-lymphocytes subsets (CD4+ and CD8+) and the secretion of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in colon, cervical, and oral squamous carcinomas [170,171]. Apigenin, in the case of melanoma (melanoma xenograft model with A375, A2058, and RPMI-7951), strongly suppresses the IFN-γ-induced activation of STAT1, leading to decreased PD-L1 expression; thus, sensitizing them to T cell-mediated killings [172]. Studies have shown that apigenin potentially stabilized Ikaros expression by targeting CK2 [173]. Overall, various phytochemicals can differentially modulate various functions of innate and adaptive immune cells to overcome tumor growth, as shown in Table 4.

4.3. Phytochemicals in Cancer: Clinical Trials and Other Studies with Human Patients

Effective clinical trials of different phytochemicals, such as various alkaloids and terpenes, flavopiridol, curcumin, silibinin, and resveratrol for the treatment of different disease conditions, are ongoing [26,190,191,192,193,194]. Various phytochemicals, not only in pre-clinical studies but also in several phases of clinical trials, have shown major positive outcomes. For example, in phase I clinical trials, curcumin alone (8 g/day) or in combination with quercetin (400/20 mg) showed significant measurable histological improvement in patients with various cancer such as pancreatic cancer [195], oral leukoplakia [196], cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [195], multiple myeloma, and advanced colorectal cancer [196]. In a phase II clinical study, Carroll and colleagues showed that curcumin (4 gm/day) resulted in a 40% reduction in aberrant crypt foci within 30 days of treatment [197].
Resveratrol clinical trials, with a dose of 2.5 gm/day for the period of 29 days, reduced the concentration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF-binding protein 3 in the plasma, inhibited tumor formation, and metastasis [198,199]. Resveratrol with dose of 1 gm/day for four weeks decreased cytochrome P450 and CYP3A4 levels and increased CYP1A2 in the plasma of healthy individuals, which could aid in cancer prevention. These molecules play an important role in detoxification and carcinogen inactivation [200]. Resveratrol shows its therapeutic activity by promoting NK cells’ effector function via recognizing transformed cells prior to proliferation more rapidly than T cells. NKG2D, an antigen receptor expressed on NK cells, T cells, and CD8+ cells, recognize specific ligands expressed on transformed cells for their tumor suppressive effect [201,202].
In addition to curcumin and resveratrol, catechins such as EGCG and epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), present in green tea in high concentrations, prevent DNA damage and mutagenesis in healthy cells [203,204]. Liver cancer patients or chain-smokers have elevated levels of 8-OHdG in their urine. Green tea supplement of 500–1000 mg/day for a period of three months significantly decreases 8-OHdG levels [204,205,206]. Zheng et al. showed that green tea had positive outcome with prostate cancer patients as well; however, green tea did not have a significant outcome in patients with stomach cancer [207,208]. Clinical trials studying elderly men supplemented with β-carotene increased CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cell percentages and enhances NK cell numbers, and EGCG with DNA vaccine enhances CD8+ cell-mediated immune responses in the TME [209]. In contrast, β-carotene (15 mg/day) and retinol (25,000 IU/day) enhance lung cancer and its mortality [210]. Another study showed that the intake of β-carotene (15 mg/day), α-tocopherol (30 mg/day), and selenium (50 µg/day), for a period of five years, lowered the risk of gastric cancer, although no effects were observed with esophageal cancer [210,211]. These conflicting outcomes of the same phytochemicals may be due to certain biomarkers expressed in different cancers during their progression. It was demonstrated that treatment with phytochemicals regresses tumor volume and enhances the synergistic effect of various chemotherapeutic drugs like 5FU, doxorubicin.
Ishikawa et al. [212] showed that in patients with colorectal, liver, or pancreatic cancer, daily consumption of 4 aged garlic capsules/day (Allium sativum 500 mg) for 12 weeks led to increased NK cell numbers and activities and was associated with more favorable outcomes. Further, daily consumption of 6 capsules (2.5 mL garlic) for 1 year led to decreased colon adenoma size and numbers [213]. A list of all the clinical trials and other studies with human subjects on the efficacy of phytochemicals in treating cancer is provided in Table 5.

5. Challenges and Future Prospectives

Although phytochemicals have been extensively studied in various cancer cell lines in vitro and in pre-clinical animal models, as well as clinical trials with some promising natural therapeutics ongoing, their clinical efficacy as an anti-cancer target is still under debate. The major problem associated with phytochemical drugs is their solubility and adsorption, beginning in the oral cavity and continuing up to the gut milieu. Additionally, phytochemicals can have a wide range of pharmacokinetics that hinge on a multitude of factors, such as the type of compound and mode of preparation. Therefore, the synthesis of easily soluble phytochemical analogs, with well-characterized kinetics, mainly in aqueous or other stabilizing conditions, that can be absorbed effectively in the gut is warranted. Furthermore, the half-life of phytochemicals is very short in human blood, and the mechanisms of their metabolism remain unclear. Therefore, improving the bioavailability and stability of phytochemicals in vivo represents another challenge to researchers. In this consequence, more efficient research is required to increase the longevity of their half-life and thereby efficacy, and a better and more in-depth understanding of their mechanism of metabolism and subsequent activity is needed.
Unfortunately, no phytochemical has been established or approved to combat cancer. Challenges associated with phytochemicals, such as inadequate information about specific targets, pre-clinical study data, optimal dose, solubility, and longevity or bioavailability, need to be overcome before phytochemical therapeutics can be approved. There is also a threat of overdosing or toxicity due to the consumption of phytochemicals in very high doses, such as overuse of wine may lead to liver damage, alcohol toxicity, socio-economic problems, and other challenges associated with intoxication. Thus, it is important to consume phytochemicals in limited doses and responsibly, even though most phytochemicals are not known to be harmful in small doses, per the direction of the physician. Additionally, further studies with combination/cocktail phytochemical therapeutics, and cutting-edge basic research with more robust and effective drug development are required. Further understanding of various dietary phytochemicals is necessary regarding various cancers via immune modulation of various innate and adaptive cells within TME, which could be safe, non-toxic, and economical anti-cancer therapeutics.

6. Conclusions

Phytochemicals have been reported to play vital immunomodulatory roles in cancer since ancient times. In recent years, extensive research on phytochemicals has shown them to be attractive anti-cancer therapeutics through modulation of the TME. More research is needed for the development of phytochemicals-mediated cancer treatment, through better understanding of cell cycle progression, inhibition of signaling cascades at various stage of cancer progression like initiation, progression, and development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. and S.P.; methodology, S.P. and N.M.; resources, R.A.; data curation, S.P. and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P. and N.M.; writing—review and editing, S.P., N.M., and R.A.; visualization, S.P. and N.M.; supervision, R.A.; funding acquisition, R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute R01 grant CA140368.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paudel, S.; Mehtani, D.; Puri, N. Mast Cells May Differentially Regulate Growth of Lymphoid Neoplasms by Opposite Modulation of Histamine Receptors. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paudel, S.; Sharma, P.; Puri, N. Immunosenescence, Inflammaging, and Their Implications for Cancer and Anemia. In Models, Molecules and Mechanisms in Biogerontology: Physiological Abnormalities, Diseases and Interventions; Rath, P.C., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kandhari, K.; Paudel, S.; Raina, K.; Agarwal, C.; Kant, R.; Wempe, M.F.; O’Bryant, C.; Agarwal, R. Comparative Pre-clinical Efficacy of Chinese and Indian Cultivars of Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia) against Pancreatic Cancer. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 26, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soerjomataram, I.; Bray, F. Planning for tomorrow: Global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020–2070. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hosseinzade, A.; Sadeghi, O.; Naghdipour Biregani, A.; Soukhtehzari, S.; Brandt, G.S.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids: Possible Induction of T CD4+ Regulatory Cells Through Suppression of mTOR Pathway Signaling Activity. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Soldati, L.; Di Renzo, L.; Jirillo, E.; Ascierto, P.A.; Marincola, F.M.; De Lorenzo, A. The influence of diet on anti-cancer immune responsiveness. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Frost, P.; Kerbel, R.S. Immunology of metastasis. Can the immune response cope with disseminated tumor? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1983, 2, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baldwin, R.W.; Embleton, M.J.; Price, M.R. Monoclonal antibody-defined antigens on tumor cells. Biomembranes 1983, 11, 285–312. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baldwin, R.W. Specific and non-specific responses in host resistance to tumors. Tokai J. Exp. Clin. Med. 1983, 8, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Baldwin, R.W.; Pimm, M.V. BCG in tumor immunotherapy. Adv. Cancer Res. 1978, 28, 91–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choudhari, A.S.; Mandave, P.C.; Deshpande, M.; Ranjekar, P.; Prakash, O. Phytochemicals in Cancer Treatment: From Preclinical Studies to Clinical Practice. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, J.; Han, Y.; Wang, W.; Jo, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Yang, K.M.; Kim, S.J.; Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Song, Y.S. Phytochemicals in Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miękus, N.; Marszałek, K.; Podlacha, M.; Iqbal, A.; Puchalski, C.; Świergiel, A.H. Health Benefits of Plant-Derived Sulfur Compounds, Glucosinolates, and Organosulfur Compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Balkrishna, A.; Sakat, S.S.; Joshi, K.; Paudel, S.; Joshi, D.; Joshi, K.; Ranjan, R.; Gupta, A.; Bhattacharya, K.; Varshney, A. Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Arthritic Efficacies of an Indian Traditional Herbo-Mineral Medicine “Divya Amvatari Ras” in Collagen Antibody-Induced Arthritis (CAIA) Mouse Model Through Modulation of IL-6/IL-1β/TNF-α/NFκB Signaling. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Balkrishna, A.; Sakat, S.S.; Joshi, K.; Paudel, S.; Joshi, D.; Joshi, K.; Ranjan, R.; Gupta, A.; Bhattacharya, K.; Varshney, A. Herbo-mineral formulation ‘Ashwashila’ attenuates rheumatoid arthritis symptoms in collagen-antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) mice model. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yin, S.Y.; Yang, N.S.; Lin, T.J. Phytochemicals Approach for Developing Cancer Immunotherapeutics. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kaur, M.; Deep, G.; Jain, A.K.; Raina, K.; Agarwal, C.; Wempe, M.F.; Agarwal, R. Bitter melon juice activates cellular energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase causing apoptotic death of human pancreatic carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Parker, K.D.; Maurya, A.K.; Ibrahim, H.; Rao, S.; Hove, P.R.; Kumar, D.; Kant, R.; Raina, B.; Agarwal, R.; Kuhn, K.A. Dietary rice bran-modified human gut microbial consortia confers protection against colon carcinogenesis following fecal transfaunation. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hasler, C.M.; Blumberg, J.B. Phytochemicals: Biochemistry and physiology. Introduction. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 756s–757s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gibson, E.L.; Wardle, J.; Watts, C.J. Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite 1998, 31, 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rao, B.N. Bioactive phytochemicals in Indian foods and their potential in health promotion and disease prevention. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 12, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Catic, T.; Oborovic, I.; Redzic, E.; Sukalo, A.; Skrbo, A.; Mašić, I. Traditional Chinese Medicine—An Overview. Int. J. Biomed. Health 2018, 6, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Balachandran, P.; Govindarajan, R. Cancer—An ayurvedic perspective. Pharmacol. Res. 2005, 51, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fatima, N.; Baqri, S.S.R.; Alsulimani, A.; Fagoonee, S.; Slama, P.; Kesari, K.K.; Roychoudhury, S.; Haque, S. Phytochemicals from Indian Ethnomedicines: Promising Prospects for the Management of Oxidative Stress and Cancer. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Vos, P. European materia medica in historical texts: Longevity of a tradition and implications for future use. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 132, 28–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huie, C.W. A review of modern sample-preparation techniques for the extraction and analysis of medicinal plants. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 373, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ogunwenmo, K.O.; Idowu, O.A.; Innocent, C.; Esan, E.B.; Oyelana, O.A. Cultivars of Codiaeum variegatum (L.) Blume (Euphorbiaceae) show variability in phytochemical and cytological characteristics. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 2400–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Majrashi, T.A.; Alshehri, S.A.; Alsayari, A.; Muhsinah, A.B.; Alrouji, M.; Alshahrani, A.M.; Shamsi, A.; Atiya, A. Insight into the Biological Roles and Mechanisms of Phytochemicals in Different Types of Cancer: Targeting Cancer Therapeutics. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harborne, A. Phytochemical Methods a Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  31. Walton, N.J.; Mayer, M.J.; Narbad, A. Vanillin. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Prior, R.L. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tripoli, E.; La Guardia, M.; Giammanco, S.; Di Majo, D.; Giammanco, M. Citrus flavonoids: Molecular structure, biological activity and nutritional properties: A review. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gupta, K.; Taneja, S.; Dhar, K.; Atal, C. Flavonoids of Andrographis paniculata. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 314–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muralidhar, A.; Sudhakar, B.; Ravishankar, T.; Reddanna, P.; Reddy, G.; Latha, J. Anti-inflammatory activity of flavonoid fraction isolated from the stem bark of Butea monosperma (LAM): A mechanism based study. Int. J. Phytopharm. 2010, 1, 124–132. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sankaranarayanan, S.; Bama, P.; Ramachandran, J.; Kalaichelvan, P.; Deccaraman, M.; Vijayalakshimi, M.; Dhamotharan, R.; Dananjeyan, B.; Sathya Bama, S. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by traditional users in Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu, India. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sannomiya, M.; Fonseca, V.B.; Da Silva, M.; Rocha, L.; Dos Santos, L.; Hiruma-Lima, C.; Brito, A.S.; Vilegas, W. Flavonoids and antiulcerogenic activity from Byrsonima crassa leaves extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Masyita, A.; Mustika Sari, R.; Dwi Astuti, A.; Yasir, B.; Rahma Rumata, N.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Simal-Gandara, J. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Stephane, F.F.Y.; Jules, B.K.J. Terpenoids as Important Bioactive Constituents of Essential Oils. In Essential Oils; Mozaniel Santana de, O., Wanessa Almeida da, C., Sebastião Gomes, S., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2020; p. Ch. 5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zakaria, K.N.; Amid, A.; Zakaria, Z.; Jamal, P.; Ismail, A. Anti-Proliferative Activity of Triterpenes Isolated from Clinicanthus nutans on Hep-G2 Liver Cancer Cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019, 20, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jahangeer, M.; Fatima, R.; Ashiq, M.; Basharat, A.; Qamar, S.A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H. Therapeutic and Biomedical Potentialities of Terpenoids-A Review. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E.; Gershenzon, J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1893–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stiller, A.; Garrison, K.; Gurdyumov, K.; Kenner, J.; Yasmin, F.; Yates, P.; Song, B.H. From Fighting Critters to Saving Lives: Polyphenols in Plant Defense and Human Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costa, M.A.; Xia, Z.; Davin, L.B.; Lewis, N.G. Toward Engineering the Metabolic Pathways of Cancer-Preventing Lignans in Cereal Grains and Other Crops. In Phytochemicals in Human Health Protection, Nutrition, and Plant Defense. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  45. Heinrich, M.; Mah, J.; Amirkia, V. Alkaloids Used as Medicines: Structural Phytochemistry Meets Biodiversity-An Update and Forward Look. Molecules 2021, 26, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Besharati, M.; Maggiolino, A.; Palangi, V.; Kaya, A.; Jabbar, M.; Eseceli, H.; De Palo, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. Tannin in Ruminant Nutrition: Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 8273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Molyneux, R.J.; Lee, S.T.; Gardner, D.R.; Panter, K.E.; James, L.F. Phytochemicals: The good, the bad and the ugly? Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2973–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ogbole, O.O.; Akin-Ajani, O.D.; Ajala, T.O.; Ogunniyi, Q.A.; Fettke, J.; Odeku, O.A. Nutritional and pharmacological potentials of orphan legumes: Subfamily faboideae. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fukuda, T.; Sudoh, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Okuda, T.; Igarashi, Y. Isolation and biosynthesis of preussin B, a pyrrolidine alkaloid from Simplicillium lanosoniveum. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hamad, M. Investigation of alkaloids of Anabasis aphylla (Chenopodiaceae). Ibn AL-Haitham J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2017, 23, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shang, X.F.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Liu, Y.Q.; Guo, X.; Xu, X.S.; Goto, M.; Li, J.C.; Yang, G.Z.; Lee, K.H. Biologically active quinoline and quinazoline alkaloids part I. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 775–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shang, X.F.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Yang, G.Z.; Liu, Y.Q.; Guo, X.; Xu, X.S.; Goto, M.; Li, J.C.; Zhang, J.Y.; Lee, K.H. Biologically active quinoline and quinazoline alkaloids part II. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 1614–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Imenshahidi, M.; Qaredashi, R.; Hashemzaei, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Inhibitory effect of Berberis vulgaris aqueous extract on acquisition and reinstatement effects of morphine in conditioned place preferences (CPP) in mice. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 2014, 9, e16145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cushnie, T.T.; Cushnie, B.; Lamb, A.J. Alkaloids: An overview of their antibacterial, antibiotic-enhancing and antivirulence activities. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mojarad, T.B.; Roghani, M. The anticonvulsant and antioxidant effects of berberine in kainate-induced temporal lobe epilepsy in rats. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2014, 5, 124. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhu, H.L.; Wan, J.B.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, B.C.; Xiang, C.; He, J.; Li, P. Medicinal compounds with antiepileptic/anticonvulsant activities. Epilepsia 2014, 55, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dall’Acqua, S. Plant-derived acetylcholinesterase inhibitory alkaloids for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bot. Targets Ther. 2013, 3, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tyroller, S.; Zwickenpflug, W.; Richter, E. New sources of dietary myosmine uptake from cereals, fruits, vegetables, and milk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4909–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Henke, E.; Nandigama, R.; Ergün, S. Extracellular Matrix in the Tumor Microenvironment and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019, 6, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hanahan, D.; Coussens, L.M. Accessories to the crime: Functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Fidler, I.J. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: The’seed and soil’hypothesis revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lambert, A.W.; Pattabiraman, D.R.; Weinberg, R.A. Emerging Biological Principles of Metastasis. Cell 2017, 168, 670–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Balkwill, F.R.; Capasso, M.; Hagemann, T. The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 5591–5596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gonzalez, H.; Hagerling, C.; Werb, Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: From tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018, 32, 1267–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Becknell, B.; Caligiuri, M.A. Interleukin-2, interleukin-15, and their roles in human natural killer cells. Adv. Immunol. 2005, 86, 209–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marshall, J.S.; Warrington, R.; Watson, W.; Kim, H.L. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fehniger, T.A.; Caligiuri, M.A. Interleukin 15: Biology and relevance to human disease. Blood 2001, 97, 14–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Finn, A.V.; Nakano, M.; Polavarapu, R.; Karmali, V.; Saeed, O.; Zhao, X.; Yazdani, S.; Otsuka, F.; Davis, T.; Habib, A.; et al. Hemoglobin directs macrophage differentiation and prevents foam cell formation in human atherosclerotic plaques. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 59, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dunn, G.P.; Bruce, A.T.; Ikeda, H.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. Cancer immunoediting: From immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: Update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dempsey, P.W.; Vaidya, S.A.; Cheng, G. The art of war: Innate and adaptive immune responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 2604–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Y.; Zeng, G. Cancer and innate immune system interactions: Translational potentials for cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. 2012, 35, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Waldhauer, I.; Steinle, A. NK cells and cancer immunosurveillance. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5932–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Schroder, K.; Hertzog, P.J.; Ravasi, T.; Hume, D.A. Interferon-gamma: An overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 75, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Screpanti, V.; Wallin, R.P.; Ljunggren, H.G.; Grandien, A. A central role for death receptor-mediated apoptosis in the rejection of tumors by NK cells. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 2068–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Poli, A.; Michel, T.; Thérésine, M.; Andrès, E.; Hentges, F.; Zimmer, J. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: An important NK cell subset. Immunology 2009, 126, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Forconi, C.S.; Oduor, C.I.; Oluoch, P.O.; Ong’echa, J.M.; Münz, C.; Bailey, J.A.; Moormann, A.M. A New Hope for CD56(neg)CD16(pos) NK Cells as Unconventional Cytotoxic Mediators: An Adaptation to Chronic Diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wu, Y.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Developmental and Functional Control of Natural Killer Cells by Cytokines. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sim, G.C.; Radvanyi, L. The IL-2 cytokine family in cancer immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014, 25, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huntington, N.D. The unconventional expression of IL-15 and its role in NK cell homeostasis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2014, 92, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Waldmann, T.A. The biology of interleukin-2 and interleukin-15: Implications for cancer therapy and vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, J.C.; Beilke, J.N.; Lanier, L.L. Adaptive immune features of natural killer cells. Nature 2009, 457, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tsai, M.-J.; Chang, W.-A.; Huang, M.-S.; Kuo, P.-L. Tumor microenvironment: A new treatment target for cancer. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lu, T.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Altiok, S.; Youn, J.I.; Cheng, P.; Celis, E.; Pisarev, V.; Sherman, S.; Sporn, M.B.; Gabrilovich, D. Tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells induce tumor cell resistance to cytotoxic T cells in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 4015–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Engblom, C.; Pfirschke, C.; Pittet, M.J. The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Murdoch, C.; Muthana, M.; Coffelt, S.B.; Lewis, C.E. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nielsen, B.S.; Borregaard, N.; Bundgaard, J.R.; Timshel, S.; Sehested, M.; Kjeldsen, L. Induction of NGAL synthesis in epithelial cells of human colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 1996, 38, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Balkwill, F.; Charles, K.A.; Mantovani, A. Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease. Cancer Cell 2005, 7, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cines, D.B.; Pollak, E.S.; Buck, C.A.; Loscalzo, J.; Zimmerman, G.A.; McEver, R.P.; Pober, J.S.; Wick, T.M.; Konkle, B.A.; Schwartz, B.S.; et al. Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood 1998, 91, 3527–3561. [Google Scholar]
  93. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A. Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: Balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2010, 22, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mosser, D.M.; Edwards, J.P. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 958–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Classen, A.; Lloberas, J.; Celada, A. Macrophage activation: Classical versus alternative. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 531, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ke, X.; Wu, M.; Lou, J.; Zhang, S.; Huang, P.; Sun, R.; Huang, L.; Xie, E.; Wang, F.; Gu, B. Activation of Toll-like receptors signaling in non-small cell lung cancer cell line induced by tumor-associated macrophages. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 27, 181. [Google Scholar]
  97. Martinez, F.O.; Helming, L.; Gordon, S. Alternative activation of macrophages: An immunologic functional perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 451–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A.; Sozzani, S.; Allavena, P.; Vecchi, A.; Locati, M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gordon, S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Koh, Y.C.; Yang, G.; Lai, C.S.; Weerawatanakorn, M.; Pan, M.H. Chemopreventive Effects of Phytochemicals and Medicines on M1/M2 Polarized Macrophage Role in Inflammation-Related Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Monteiro, L.N.; Rodrigues, M.A.; Gomes, D.A.; Salgado, B.S.; Cassali, G.D. Tumour-associated macrophages: Relation with progression and invasiveness, and assessment of M1/M2 macrophages in canine mammary tumours. Vet. J. 2018, 234, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vinogradov, S.; Warren, G.; Wei, X. Macrophages associated with tumors as potential targets and therapeutic intermediates. Nanomedicine 2014, 9, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dandekar, R.C.; Kingaonkar, A.V.; Dhabekar, G.S. Role of macrophages in malignancy. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 1, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, Y.; Lin, Y.X.; Qiao, S.L.; An, H.W.; Ma, Y.; Qiao, Z.Y.; Rajapaksha, R.P.; Wang, H. Polymeric nanoparticles promote macrophage reversal from M2 to M1 phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment. Biomaterials 2017, 112, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shrivastava, R.; Asif, M.; Singh, V.; Dubey, P.; Ahmad Malik, S.; Lone, M.U.; Tewari, B.N.; Baghel, K.S.; Pal, S.; Nagar, G.K.; et al. M2 polarization of macrophages by Oncostatin M in hypoxic tumor microenvironment is mediated by mTORC2 and promotes tumor growth and metastasis. Cytokine 2019, 118, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ding, L.; Liang, G.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, H.; Yang, B.; He, Q. Metformin prevents cancer metastasis by inhibiting M2-like polarization of tumor associated macrophages. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 36441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Schneider, T.; Hoffmann, H.; Dienemann, H.; Schnabel, P.A.; Enk, A.H.; Ring, S.; Mahnke, K. Non-small cell lung cancer induces an immunosuppressive phenotype of dendritic cells in tumor microenvironment by upregulating B7-H3. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011, 6, 1162–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Karthaus, N.; Torensma, R.; Tel, J. Deciphering the message broadcast by tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Krempski, J.; Karyampudi, L.; Behrens, M.D.; Erskine, C.L.; Hartmann, L.; Dong, H.; Goode, E.L.; Kalli, K.R.; Knutson, K.L. Tumor-infiltrating programmed death receptor-1+ dendritic cells mediate immune suppression in ovarian cancer. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 6905–6913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Sisirak, V.; Faget, J.; Gobert, M.; Goutagny, N.; Vey, N.; Treilleux, I.; Renaudineau, S.; Poyet, G.; Labidi-Galy, S.I.; Goddard-Leon, S. Impaired IFN-α production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells favors regulatory T-cell expansion that may contribute to breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5188–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Netea, M.G.; Domínguez-Andrés, J.; Barreiro, L.B.; Chavakis, T.; Divangahi, M.; Fuchs, E.; Joosten, L.A.B.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; Mhlanga, M.M.; Mulder, W.J.M.; et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. McBlane, J.F.; van Gent, D.C.; Ramsden, D.A.; Romeo, C.; Cuomo, C.A.; Gellert, M.; Oettinger, M.A. Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps. Cell 1995, 83, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bonilla, F.A.; Oettgen, H.C. Adaptive immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125 (Suppl. S2), S33–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wands, J.; Mann, E.; Alpert, E.; Isselbacher, K. The pathogenesis of arthritis associated with acute hepatitis-B surface antigen-positive hepatitis. Complement activation and characterization of circulating immune complexes. J. Clin. Investig. 1975, 55, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Knutson, K.L.; Disis, M.L. Augmenting T helper cell immunity in cancer. Curr. Drug Targets Immune Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2005, 5, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Oh, D.Y.; Kwek, S.S.; Raju, S.S.; Li, T.; McCarthy, E.; Chow, E.; Aran, D.; Ilano, A.; Pai, C.-C.S.; Rancan, C. Intratumoral CD4+ T cells mediate anti-tumor cytotoxicity in human bladder cancer. Cell 2020, 181, 1612–1625.e1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Siddiqui, S.A.; Frigola, X.; Bonne-Annee, S.; Mercader, M.; Kuntz, S.M.; Krambeck, A.E.; Sengupta, S.; Dong, H.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M. Tumor-infiltrating Foxp3− CD4+ CD25+ T cells predict poor survival in renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2075–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Leffers, N.; Gooden, M.J.; de Jong, R.A.; Hoogeboom, B.-N.; ten Hoor, K.A.; Hollema, H.; Boezen, H.M.; van der Zee, A.G.; Daemen, T.; Nijman, H.W. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T-lymphocytes in primary and metastatic lesions of advanced stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009, 58, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Karpisheh, V.; Mousavi, S.M.; Sheykholeslami, P.N.; Fathi, M.; Saray, M.M.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Jafari, R.; Zolbanin, N.M.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F. The role of regulatory T cells in the pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer. Life Sci. 2021, 284, 119132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Farhood, B.; Najafi, M.; Mortezaee, K. CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in cancer immunotherapy: A review. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 8509–8521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wei, T.; Zhang, J.; Qin, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Lu, L.; Tang, G.; Shen, Q. Increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules on intratumoral and circulating regulatory T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 2190–2201. [Google Scholar]
  122. Lippitz, B.E. Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, e218–e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vesely, M.D.; Kershaw, M.H.; Schreiber, R.D.; Smyth, M.J. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 235–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Veatch, J.R.; Jesernig, B.L.; Kargl, J.; Fitzgibbon, M.; Lee, S.M.; Baik, C.; Martins, R.; Houghton, A.M.; Riddell, S.R. Endogenous CD4(+) T Cells Recognize Neoantigens in Lung Cancer Patients, Including Recurrent Oncogenic KRAS and ERBB2 (Her2) Driver Mutations. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 910–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Geng, Y.; Shao, Y.; He, W.; Hu, W.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, C.; Jiang, J. Prognostic Role of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 37, 1560–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ma, K.; Hu, C.; Zhu, H.; Liang, S.; Liu, M.; Xu, N. IL-6 influences the polarization of macrophages and the formation and growth of colorectal tumor. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 17443–17454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Frydrychowicz, M.; Boruczkowski, M.; Kolecka-Bednarczyk, A.; Dworacki, G. The Dual Role of Treg in Cancer. Scand. J. Immunol. 2017, 86, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Francisco, L.M.; Salinas, V.H.; Brown, K.E.; Vanguri, V.K.; Freeman, G.J.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Sharpe, A.H. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 3015–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Korkolopoulou, P.; Kaklamanis, L.; Pezzella, F.; Harris, A.L.; Gatter, K.C. Loss of antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class I and TAP-1) in lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1996, 73, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Mirzaei, H.; Naseri, G.; Rezaee, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Banikazemi, Z.; Mirzaei, H.R.; Salehi, H.; Peyvandi, M.; Pawelek, J.M.; Sahebkar, A. Curcumin: A new candidate for melanoma therapy? Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 1683–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Priyadarsini, K.I. The chemistry of curcumin: From extraction to therapeutic agent. Molecules 2014, 19, 20091–20112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Borst, J.; Ahrends, T.; Bąbała, N.; Melief, C.J.M.; Kastenmüller, W. CD4(+) T cell help in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Albini, A.; Bruno, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Mortara, L. Contribution to Tumor Angiogenesis From Innate Immune Cells Within the Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Smyth, M.J.; Hayakawa, Y.; Takeda, K.; Yagita, H. New aspects of natural-killer-cell surveillance and therapy of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 850–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Huang, Q.; Xia, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.; Deng, Q.; Lu, Y.; Kumar, M.; Zhou, Z.; Li, L.; et al. miR-153 suppresses IDO1 expression and enhances CAR T cell immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Attili, I.; Karachaliou, N.; Bonanno, L.; Berenguer, J.; Bracht, J.; Codony-Servat, J.; Codony-Servat, C.; Ito, M.; Rosell, R. STAT3 as a potential immunotherapy biomarker in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2018, 10, 1758835918763744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. George, B.P.; Chandran, R.; Abrahamse, H. Role of Phytochemicals in Cancer Chemoprevention: Insights. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Forghani, P.; Khorramizadeh, M.R.; Waller, E.K. Silibinin inhibits accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor growth of murine breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2014, 3, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bae, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, M.J.; Chang, S.H.; Park, Y.S.; Son, C.H.; Park, S.J.; Chung, J.S.; Lee, E.Y.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Quercetin enhances susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis of tumor cells through induction of NKG2D ligands and suppression of HSP70. J. Immunother. 2010, 33, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Nelson, N.; Szekeres, K.; Iclozan, C.; Rivera, I.O.; McGill, A.; Johnson, G.; Nwogu, O.; Ghansah, T. Apigenin: Selective CK2 inhibitor increases Ikaros expression and improves T cell homeostasis and function in murine pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Fraker, L.D.; Halter, S.A.; Forbes, J.T. Effects of orally administered retinol on natural killer cell activity in wild type BALB/c and congenitally athymic BALB/c mice. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1986, 21, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cerwenka, A.; Bakker, A.B.; McClanahan, T.; Wagner, J.; Wu, J.; Phillips, J.H.; Lanier, L.L. Retinoic acid early inducible genes define a ligand family for the activating NKG2D receptor in mice. Immunity 2000, 12, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kim, H.; Jang, M.; Kim, Y.; Choi, J.; Jeon, J.; Kim, J.; Hwang, Y.I.; Kang, J.S.; Lee, W.J. Red ginseng and vitamin C increase immune cell activity and decrease lung inflammation induced by influenza A virus/H1N1 infection. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2016, 68, 406–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Al-Jaderi, Z.; Maghazachi, A.A. Effects of vitamin D3, calcipotriol and FTY720 on the expression of surface molecules and cytolytic activities of human natural killer cells and dendritic cells. Toxins 2013, 5, 1932–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wei, J.; Bhatt, S.; Chang, L.M.; Sampson, H.A.; Masilamani, M. Isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, regulate mucosal immune response by suppressing dendritic cell function. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, Y.; Song, T.T.; Cunnick, J.E.; Murphy, P.A.; Hendrich, S. Daidzein and genistein glucuronides in vitro are weakly estrogenic and activate human natural killer cells at nutritionally relevant concentrations. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhang, H.G.; Kim, H.; Liu, C.; Yu, S.; Wang, J.; Grizzle, W.E.; Kimberly, R.P.; Barnes, S. Curcumin reverses breast tumor exosomes mediated immune suppression of NK cell tumor cytotoxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1773, 1116–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Yadav, V.S.; Mishra, K.P.; Singh, D.P.; Mehrotra, S.; Singh, V.K. Immunomodulatory effects of curcumin. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2005, 27, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Fiala, M. Curcumin and omega-3 fatty acids enhance NK cell-induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells but curcumin inhibits interferon-γ production: Benefits of omega-3 with curcumin against cancer. Molecules 2015, 20, 3020–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Paul, S.; Sa, G. Curcumin as an Adjuvant to Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 675923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Alaswad, H.A.; Mahbub, A.A.; Le Maitre, C.L.; Jordan-Mahy, N. Molecular Action of Polyphenols in Leukaemia and Their Therapeutic Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Garrido, C.; Spivak, A.M.; Soriano-Sarabia, N.; Checkley, M.A.; Barker, E.; Karn, J.; Planelles, V.; Margolis, D.M. HIV Latency-Reversing Agents Have Diverse Effects on Natural Killer Cell Function. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Quoc Trung, L.; Espinoza, J.L.; Takami, A.; Nakao, S. Resveratrol induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in malignant NK cells via JAK2/STAT3 pathway inhibition. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Falchetti, R.; Fuggetta, M.P.; Lanzilli, G.; Tricarico, M.; Ravagnan, G. Effects of resveratrol on human immune cell function. Life Sci. 2001, 70, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ivanov, V.N.; Partridge, M.A.; Johnson, G.E.; Huang, S.X.; Zhou, H.; Hei, T.K. Resveratrol sensitizes melanomas to TRAIL through modulation of antiapoptotic gene expression. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 1163–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Shankar, S.; Siddiqui, I.; Srivastava, R.K. Molecular mechanisms of resveratrol (3,4,5-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) and its interaction with TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 304, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Shankar, S.; Chen, Q.; Siddiqui, I.; Sarva, K.; Srivastava, R.K. Sensitization of TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cells by resveratrol (3, 4′, 5 tri-hydroxystilbene): Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. J. Mol. Signal. 2007, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.M. Resveratrol-mediated sensitisation to TRAIL-induced apoptosis depends on death receptor and mitochondrial signalling. Eur. J. Cancer 2005, 41, 786–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.M. Sensitization for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis by the chemopreventive agent resveratrol. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hofer, S.; Geisler, S.; Lisandrelli, R.; Nguyen Ngoc, H.; Ganzera, M.; Schennach, H.; Fuchs, D.; Fuchs, J.E.; Gostner, J.M.; Kurz, K. Pharmacological Targets of Kaempferol Within Inflammatory Pathways-A Hint Towards the Central Role of Tryptophan Metabolism. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Shang, A.; Cao, S.Y.; Xu, X.Y.; Gan, R.Y.; Tang, G.Y.; Corke, H.; Mavumengwana, V.; Li, H.B. Bioactive Compounds and Biological Functions of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Foods 2019, 8, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kis, B.; Ifrim, F.C.; Buda, V.; Avram, S.; Pavel, I.Z.; Antal, D.; Paunescu, V.; Dehelean, C.A.; Ardelean, F.; Diaconeasa, Z.; et al. Cannabidiol-from Plant to Human Body: A Promising Bioactive Molecule with Multi-Target Effects in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. De Silva, S.F.; Alcorn, J. Flaxseed Lignans as Important Dietary Polyphenols for Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Chemistry, Pharmacokinetics, and Molecular Targets. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mace, T.A.; King, S.A.; Ameen, Z.; Elnaggar, O.; Young, G.; Riedl, K.M.; Schwartz, S.J.; Clinton, S.K.; Knobloch, T.J.; Weghorst, C.M.; et al. Bioactive compounds or metabolites from black raspberries modulate T lymphocyte proliferation, myeloid cell differentiation and Jak/STAT signaling. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014, 63, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Catanzaro, M.; Corsini, E.; Rosini, M.; Racchi, M.; Lanni, C. Immunomodulators Inspired by Nature: A Review on Curcumin and Echinacea. Molecules 2018, 23, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Miller, S.C. Echinacea: A miracle herb against aging and cancer? Evidence in vivo in mice. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2005, 2, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Kim, G.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.H.; Yoon, M.S.; Lee, H.J.; Moon, D.O.; Lee, C.M.; Ahn, S.C.; Park, Y.C.; Park, Y.M. Curcumin inhibits immunostimulatory function of dendritic cells: MAPKs and translocation of NF-kappa B as potential targets. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 8116–8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rao, C.V.; Rivenson, A.; Simi, B.; Reddy, B.S. Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by dietary curcumin, a naturally occurring plant phenolic compound. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  169. Milani, A.; Basirnejad, M.; Shahbazi, S.; Bolhassani, A. Carotenoids: Biochemistry, pharmacology and treatment. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1290–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Bala, M.; Pratap, K.; Verma, P.K.; Singh, B.; Padwad, Y. Validation of ethnomedicinal potential of Tinospora cordifolia for anticancer and immunomodulatory activities and quantification of bioactive molecules by HPTLC. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 175, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ahmad, W.; Jantan, I.; Kumolosasi, E.; Bukhari, S.N. Immunostimulatory effects of the standardized extract of Tinospora crispa on innate immune responses in Wistar Kyoto rats. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 2961–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, R.; Mu, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Liu, F.; et al. Apigenin suppresses PD-L1 expression in melanoma and host dendritic cells to elicit synergistic therapeutic effects. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yan, X.; Qi, M.; Li, P.; Zhan, Y.; Shao, H. Apigenin in cancer therapy: Anti-cancer effects and mechanisms of action. Cell Biosci. 2017, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wood, S.M.; Beckham, C.; Yosioka, A.; Darban, H.; Watson, R.R. β-Carotene and selenium supplementation enhances immune response in aged humans. Integr. Med. 2000, 2, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Garcia, A.L.; Rühl, R.; Herz, U.; Koebnick, C.; Schweigert, F.J.; Worm, M. Retinoid- and carotenoid-enriched diets influence the ontogenesis of the immune system in mice. Immunology 2003, 110, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kang, T.H.; Lee, J.H.; Song, C.K.; Han, H.D.; Shin, B.C.; Pai, S.I.; Hung, C.F.; Trimble, C.; Lim, J.S.; Kim, T.W.; et al. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate enhances CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by DNA vaccination. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hood, J.L. Melanoma exosome induction of endothelial cell GM-CSF in pre-metastatic lymph nodes may result in different M1 and M2 macrophage mediated angiogenic processes. Med. Hypotheses 2016, 94, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Buttari, B.; Profumo, E.; Segoni, L.; D’Arcangelo, D.; Rossi, S.; Facchiano, F.; Saso, L.; Businaro, R.; Iuliano, L.; Riganò, R. Resveratrol counteracts inflammation in human M1 and M2 macrophages upon challenge with 7-oxo-cholesterol: Potential therapeutic implications in atherosclerosis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 257543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Gamez-Belmonte, R.; Erkert, L.; Wirtz, S.; Becker, C. The regulation of intestinal inflammation and cancer development by type 2 immune responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Deng, Y.-M.; Zhao, C.; Wu, L.; Qu, Z.; Wang, X.-Y. Cannabinoid Receptor-1 suppresses M2 macrophage polarization in colorectal cancer by downregulating EGFR. Cell Death Discov. 2022, 8, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Aikun, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zheng, S.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, W. Echinacea purpurea Extract Polarizes M1 Macrophages in Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Through the Activation of JNK. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 118, 2664–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ding, S.M.; Zhang, Z.H.; Song, J.; Cheng, X.D.; Jiang, J.; Jia, X.B. Enhanced bioavailability of apigenin via preparation of a carbon nanopowder solid dispersion. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2327–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Luo, C.; Wu, X.G. Lycopene enhances antioxidant enzyme activities and immunity function in N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-enduced gastric cancer rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 3340–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Bhattacharyya, S.; Md Sakib Hossain, D.; Mohanty, S.; Sankar Sen, G.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Banerjee, S.; Chakraborty, J.; Das, K.; Sarkar, D.; Das, T.; et al. Curcumin reverses T cell-mediated adaptive immune dysfunctions in tumor-bearing hosts. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 7, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Hussain, A.R.; Al-Rasheed, M.; Manogaran, P.S.; Al-Hussein, K.A.; Platanias, L.C.; Al Kuraya, K.; Uddin, S. Curcumin induces apoptosis via inhibition of PI3’-kinase/AKT pathway in acute T cell leukemias. Apoptosis 2006, 11, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Shao, Y.; Zhu, W.; Da, J.; Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Z. Bisdemethoxycurcumin in combination with α-PD-L1 antibody boosts immune response against bladder cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017, 10, 2675–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Focaccetti, C.; Benvenuto, M.; Ciuffa, S.; Fazi, S.; Scimeca, M.; Nardi, A.; Miele, M.T.; Battisti, A.; Bonanno, E.; Modesti, A.; et al. Curcumin Enhances the Antitumoral Effect Induced by the Recombinant Vaccinia Neu Vaccine (rV-neuT) in Mice with Transplanted Salivary Gland Carcinoma Cells. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zhao, G.J.; Lu, Z.Q.; Tang, L.M.; Wu, Z.S.; Wang, D.W.; Zheng, J.Y.; Qiu, Q.M. Curcumin inhibits suppressive capacity of naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in mice in vitro. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2012, 14, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Proksch, P.; Giaisi, M.; Treiber, M.K.; Palfi, K.; Merling, A.; Spring, H.; Krammer, P.H.; Li-Weber, M. Rocaglamide derivatives are immunosuppressive phytochemicals that target NF-AT activity in T cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 7075–7084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Saleh, M.M.; Darwish, Z.E.; El Nouaem, M.I.; Fayed, N.A.; Mourad, G.M.; Ramadan, O.R. The potential preventive effect of dietary phytochemicals In Vivo. BDJ Open 2023, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Paudel, S.; Mishra, N.; Raina, K.; Agarwal, C.; Agarwal, R. Inhibition of ultraviolet B radiation-induced mast cell recruitment by silibinin in its efficacy against basal cell carcinoma in Ptch+/− mouse model. Cancer Res. 2023, 83 (Suppl. S7), 5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Mishra, N.; Paudel, S.; Agarwal, C.; Agarwal, R. Silibinin modulates migration and survival pathways in bone marrow mast cells via RAC2: Implications in its anti-cancer activity in basal cell carcinoma growth and progression. Cancer Res. 2023, 83 (Suppl. S7), 5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Raina, K.; Paudel, S.; Mishra, N.; Kumar, S.; Orlicky, D.J.; You, Z.; Kant, R.; Agarwal, C.; Agarwal, R. Silibinin: A novel potential therapeutic agent against UVB-induced basal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2022, 82 (Suppl. S12), 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Paudel, S.; Raina, K.; Tiku, V.R.; Maurya, A.; Orlicky, D.J.; You, Z.; Rigby, C.M.; Deep, G.; Kant, R.; Raina, B.; et al. Chemopreventive efficacy of silibinin against basal cell carcinoma growth and progression in UVB-irradiated Ptch+/– mice. Carcinogenesis 2022, 43, 557–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Bar-Sela, G.; Epelbaum, R.; Schaffer, M. Curcumin as an anti-cancer agent: Review of the gap between basic and clinical applications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Gupta, S.C.; Patchva, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: Lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013, 15, 195–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Carroll, R.E.; Benya, R.V.; Turgeon, D.K.; Vareed, S.; Neuman, M.; Rodriguez, L.; Kakarala, M.; Carpenter, P.M.; McLaren, C.; Meyskens, F.L., Jr.; et al. Phase IIa clinical trial of curcumin for the prevention of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011, 4, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Brown, V.A.; Patel, K.R.; Viskaduraki, M.; Crowell, J.A.; Perloff, M.; Booth, T.D.; Vasilinin, G.; Sen, A.; Schinas, A.M.; Piccirilli, G.; et al. Repeat dose study of the cancer chemopreventive agent resveratrol in healthy volunteers: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and effect on the insulin-like growth factor axis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 9003–9011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Renehan, A.G.; Zwahlen, M.; Minder, C.; O’Dwyer, S.T.; Shalet, S.M.; Egger, M. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 2004, 363, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Chow, H.H.; Garland, L.L.; Hsu, C.H.; Vining, D.R.; Chew, W.M.; Miller, J.A.; Perloff, M.; Crowell, J.A.; Alberts, D.S. Resveratrol modulates drug- and carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes in a healthy volunteer study. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Guerra, N.; Tan, Y.X.; Joncker, N.T.; Choy, A.; Gallardo, F.; Xiong, N.; Knoblaugh, S.; Cado, D.; Greenberg, N.M.; Raulet, D.H. NKG2D-deficient mice are defective in tumor surveillance in models of spontaneous malignancy. Immunity 2008, 28, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Bui, J.D.; Schreiber, R.D. Cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting and inflammation: Independent or interdependent processes? Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Wu, A.H.; Yu, M.C. Tea, hormone-related cancers and endogenous hormone levels. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006, 50, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Hakim, I.A.; Harris, R.B.; Brown, S.; Chow, H.H.; Wiseman, S.; Agarwal, S.; Talbot, W. Effect of increased tea consumption on oxidative DNA damage among smokers: A randomized controlled study. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 3303s–3309s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Hakim, I.A.; Chow, H.H.; Harris, R.B. Green tea consumption is associated with decreased DNA damage among GSTM1-positive smokers regardless of their hOGG1 genotype. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1567s–1571s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Luo, H.; Tang, L.; Tang, M.; Billam, M.; Huang, T.; Yu, J.; Wei, Z.; Liang, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Z.Q.; et al. Phase IIa chemoprevention trial of green tea polyphenols in high-risk individuals of liver cancer: Modulation of urinary excretion of green tea polyphenols and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Johnson, J.J.; Nihal, M.; Siddiqui, I.A.; Scarlett, C.O.; Bailey, H.H.; Mukhtar, H.; Ahmad, N. Enhancing the bioavailability of resveratrol by combining it with piperine. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Hamajima, N.; Tajima, K.; Tominaga, S.; Matsuura, A.; Kuwabara, M.; Okuma, K. Tea polyphenol intake and changes in serum pepsinogen levels. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Santos, M.S.; Gaziano, J.M.; Leka, L.S.; Beharka, A.A.; Hennekens, C.H.; Meydani, S.N. Beta-carotene-induced enhancement of natural killer cell activity in elderly men: An investigation of the role of cytokines. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Albanes, D.; Heinonen, O.P.; Taylor, P.R.; Virtamo, J.; Edwards, B.K.; Rautalahti, M.; Hartman, A.M.; Palmgren, J.; Freedman, L.S.; Haapakoski, J.; et al. Alpha-Tocopherol and beta-carotene supplements and lung cancer incidence in the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study: Effects of base-line characteristics and study compliance. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996, 88, 1560–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Blot, W.J.; Li, J.Y.; Taylor, P.R.; Guo, W.; Dawsey, S.; Wang, G.Q.; Yang, C.S.; Zheng, S.F.; Gail, M.; Li, G.Y.; et al. Nutrition intervention trials in Linxian, China: Supplementation with specific vitamin/mineral combinations, cancer incidence, and disease-specific mortality in the general population. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 1483–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Ishikawa, H.; Saeki, T.; Otani, T.; Suzuki, T.; Shimozuma, K.; Nishino, H.; Fukuda, S.; Morimoto, K. Aged garlic extract prevents a decline of NK cell number and activity in patients with advanced cancer. J. Nutr. 2006, 136 (Suppl. S3), 816s–820s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Tanaka, S.; Haruma, K.; Yoshihara, M.; Kajiyama, G.; Kira, K.; Amagase, H.; Chayama, K. Aged garlic extract has potential suppressive effect on colorectal adenomas in humans. J. Nutr. 2006, 136 (Suppl. S3), 821s–826s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Recruitment of different immune cells to the tumor site and their anti-tumor and pro-tumor properties. Red lines indicate blood vessels.
Figure 1. Recruitment of different immune cells to the tumor site and their anti-tumor and pro-tumor properties. Red lines indicate blood vessels.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01652 g001
Figure 2. Overview of immune-modulation of the cancer microenvironment by phytochemicals. The green arrows represent upregulation and red arrows represent downregulation.
Figure 2. Overview of immune-modulation of the cancer microenvironment by phytochemicals. The green arrows represent upregulation and red arrows represent downregulation.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01652 g002
Table 1. Bioactive phenolics, their structural backbones, and sources.
Table 1. Bioactive phenolics, their structural backbones, and sources.
PhenolicsStructural BackboneRepresentative FlavonoidDietary SourcesMedical PlantsPropertiesRefs.
FlavanonolPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i001TaxifolinTeaBrysonima crassa, Pongamia pinnataAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[27]
FlavonePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i002Apigenin, Rutin, Luteolin, Leteolin Glucosides, Chrysin, Apigenin,Buckwheat, redpepper, fruits and tomato skin, beets, artichokes, lemongrass, chamomileAloe vera,
Acalypha indica,
Bocopa moneirra, Glyccheriza glabra, Limnophila indica, Mentha longifolia, Momordica charantia,
Antioxidant[27]
FlavanolsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i003Kaempferol, Quercetin, Tamarixetin, Myricetin, GalanginGrapefruit, berries, olive oil, red and yellow onion, brassicatees, walnutsAzadirachta indica,
Betula pendula, Bauhinia monandra,
Cannabis sativa,
Clitoria ternatea,
Mimosa pudica
Antioxidant,
cardioprotection, antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer
[33,34,35,36,37]
FlavanonePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i004Naringin, Naringenin, Hesperetin,
Silybin
Orange, lemon, grapefruit,
milk thistel
Citrus mediaAntioxidant, antiinflammatory[31]
IsoflavonePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i005Daidzin, Genistin, GlyciteinSoybean, chickpeas, peanuts, alfalfa sprouts, red clover, soyButea monospermeaImmunomodulatory, antioxidant[35]
Flavan-3-olsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i006Catechin, Epictechin, Gallate, Proanthocyanidins, Theaflavins, Thearubigins, EpigallocatechinBlack tea, green tea, lentils, wine, cocoas, apple juiceAtunu raacemosa,
Camellia sinensis
Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, immunemodulatory[31,32]
Hydroxybenzoic acidsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i007Salicylic Acid,
Salicin
Tea, potato, rosaceous fruit, red winePiper marginatum,
Pandanus Odorus
Antioxidant[31]
Hydroxycinnamic acidPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i008Caffeic, Ferulic Acid, Coumaric AcidCoffee, apple, plums, cherries, peaches, eggplant, artichoke, cabbagePinuseldarica, Rheumemodi, cyperus rotundus, Euphorbia tirucalliAntioxidant, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antidiabetic[31,32]
Table 2. Bioactive terpenoids, their structural backbones, and sources.
Table 2. Bioactive terpenoids, their structural backbones, and sources.
TrepenoidsStructural BackboneTrepenoidsDietary SourcesMedical PlantsPropertiesRefs.
HemiterpenoidsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i009Isovaleric Acid, Prenol, IsopereneGrapefruit, hops, orangePrinsepia utilis,
Cananga odorata,
Humulus lupulus
Antioxidants[43,44]
MonoterpenoidsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i010Geranyl Pyrophosphate, Eucalytol, Limonene, Citral, Camphor, PineneMints,
garlic, maize, rosemary, ginger, citrus oils
MenthaLongifolia,
Anetheumgraveolens, Magnolia officinalis, Cannabis saativa,
Cannabis indica
Antioxidant, anticancer, antidiabetic, immunostimulant[43,44]
SesquiterpenesPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i011Artemisinin,
Bisabolol, Fernesol, Eudesmol
Ceylon cinnamon, pepper, turmeric, ginger, lettuce, and potatosCyperus edulis,
Aframomumarundinaceum,
Artemisia annua,
Thapsia garganica
Antitumor/anticancer, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiulcer, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiparasitic[43,44]
DiterpenesPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i012Cembrene, Kahweol, Taxadiene, CafestolCoffeeCoffea arabica, Taxusbrevifolia,Anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory[43,44]
TriterpenesPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i013Lanosterol, Squalene,
Saponins,
Oleanolic Acid,
Ursolic Acid,
Betulinic Acid
Soyabeans, legumes, alfalfa, java apple, garlic, lavender, caranberries, winged beans, white birchTriphyophyllum peltatum, Diospyros leucomelas,
Tetracera boiviniana
Anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-viral, antibacterial, antifungal[43,44]
TetraterpenoidsPharmaceuticals 16 01652 i014Lycopene, Carotene,
Phytofluene,
Phytoene
Carrots, pumpkins, orange, sweet potato, orange, autumn oliveMauritia Vinifera, Myrciaria dubia,
Spondias lutea
Anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcer, antibacterial, antiviral, hepatoprotective, immunomodulatory, anti-atherosclerotic, wound healing[43,44]
Table 3. Bioactive alkaloids, their structural backbones, and sources.
Table 3. Bioactive alkaloids, their structural backbones, and sources.
AlkaloidsStructure BackboneAlkaloidsDietary SourcesMedical PlantsPropertiesRefs.
PyrrolidinePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i015Piperine,
Coniine, Isope-lletierine, Preussin B
Barley, bine, peppers, apple, spinach celery, celeriacApium graveolens,
Spinacia oleracea,
Malus domestica,
Capsicum annuum,
Humulus lupulus,
Hordeum vulgare,
Simplicillium lanosoniveum
Antimicrobial, antitumor, anticonvulsant, anti-tubercular, analgesic[49]
Pyridine-piperidinePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i016AnabasineTobaccoAnabasis aphyllanAntitumor, antimicrobial, antiviral, analgesic, anticonvulsant, antiinflammatory, antioxidant, anti-Alzheimer’s, anti-ulcer, anti-diabetic[50]
QuinolinePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i017Quinine, Quinidine, Cinchonine, Cinchonidine,
Ellipticine
Cocoa, black tea, scotch whiskeyCinchona succirubra,
Ochrosia Elliptica
Antimalarial, antibacterial, antifungal, anthelmintic, cardiotonic, anticonvulsant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic[51,52]
IsoquinolinePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i018Berberine, Morphine, Montanine, Salsoline,
Galantamine
Goldthread, Oregon grape, phellodendron, turmeric, barberryHydrastis Canadensis,
Papaver somniferun,
Narcissus tazetta, Salsola oppositefolia, Hippeastrum Bittatum
Anti-inflammatory, improves digestion[53,54,55,56,57]
Pyrrolidine-pyridinePharmaceuticals 16 01652 i019Myosmine, NicotineKiwi, millet, potato, milk, maize, rice, pineappleNicotianatabaccumAntitumor, antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, anti-tubercular, analgesic[58]
Table 4. Phytochemicals and their immunomodulatory effects in cancer.
Table 4. Phytochemicals and their immunomodulatory effects in cancer.
PhytochemicalsImmunomodulatory EffectsType of CancerStudy TypeRefs.
Kaempferol↑↑↑NFκB signaling
↑↑↑IL-1β
↑↑↑TNF
↓↓↓IL6
Skin, liver, colon, ovary, pancreas, stomach, and bladder cancersIn vitro (PBMC and cell HaCaT, THP1-Blue, THP1-Blue-CD14)[160]
Crude Garlic Extract↑↑↑CD4+/CD8+ ratio
↑↑↑IFN-γ
↑↑↑IL-2, IL-4
↑↑↑Th1/Th2 response
↑↑↑Lymphocyte proliferation
Liver, colon, prostate, and breast cancersIn vivo (Wister rats and chickens) [161]
Cannabinoids↑↑↑T-cells and Macrophage
↓↓↓T-helper 2 cells
↓↓↓IL-10
↓↓↓TNFα and IL-1β expression in macrophages
Breast, lung, colon, prostate, skin, and brain cancersIn vivo (female athymic nude mice)
In vitro (cell lines MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, DU-145, CaCo-2, AGS)
[162]
Flaxseed Lignans↑↑↑NFκB signaling
↓↓↓Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNFα, HMGB1, TGFß1, TNFαR1, TGFßR1)
↓↓↓COX-2 level and activity
Breast and prostate cancersIn vivo (female athymic nude mice)
In vitro (cell lines MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, DU-145, CaCo-2, AGS)
[163]
Anthocyanin↑↑↑T-cell proliferation, survival, MDSC differentiation
↓↓↓Cytokine-induced STAT protein phosphorylation
Oral and cervical cancersPBMCs (healthy adult donors)[164]
Quercetin↓↓↓Pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines
↓↓↓MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecule
↓↓↓Ag-specific T-cell activation by reducing LPS-stimulated DC activity
-Leukocyte biology and Th1/Th2 balance regulation
Oral, cervical, and lung cancersPBMCs (healthy adult donors)[6,164]
Echinacea↑↑↑Macrophages
↑↑↑Phagocytosis
↑↑↑TNF-α, IL-1, IFN-β
↑↑↑Leukocyte mobility
↑↑↑NK cell stimulants and NK cell activation
↑↑↑Murine bone-marrow derived macrophage by increasing CD80, CD86, MHCII expression
Leukemias and lymphomasIn vivo (Leukemic mice)[165,166]
Curcumin↑↑↑Apoptosis of malignant cells
↑↑↑T cells ability to kill cancer cells
↑↑↑ CD4+ T-cell and B cell numbers
↑↑↑Lymphocyte-mediated immune functions
↑↑↑Progenitor, effecter, and circulating T-cells
↓↓↓Treg cell activity
↓↓↓TGFβ and IL-10
-Th1/Tc1-type cytokine-producing effector T–cell population normalizes in tumor-bearing hosts
↓↓↓CD80, CD86, MHC class II in DCs.
↓↓↓IL-12 expression in DCs
↓↓↓IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα in DCs
↓↓↓Metastasis
↓↓↓NFĸB signaling
Breast, colon, colorectal, head and neck, bladder, skin, ovarian pancreatic, and prostate cancersIn vivo (female athymic nude mice)
In vitro (cell lines MDA-MB-435, CCL23, CAL27, UM-SCC1, UM-SCCC14A)
[138,167,168]
Tinospora cordifolia↑↑↑T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation
↑↑↑T-lymphocytes subsets (CD4+ and CD8+)
↑↑↑Th1 and Th2 cytokine secretion
Oral squamous carcinoma, colon, and cervical cancersIn vivo (male Wistar Kyoto rats)
In vitro (cell lines KB, CHOK-1, HT-29, SiHa and murine primary cells)
[169]
Apigenin↑↑↑IFN-γ-induced activation of STAT1
↑↑↑T-cell immunity
↑↑↑Sensitive to T cell-mediated cell death
↑↑↑CD4+CD8+ T-cells
↓↓↓PD-L1 in DCs
↓↓↓Tregs
↓↓↓Tumor weights and splenomegaly
stabilized Ikaros expression in vitro and in vivo by targeting CK2
Melanoma, colorectal, breast, lung, prostate, leukemia, ovarian cancersIn vivo (C57BL/6 mice)
In vitro (cell lines A375, A2058, RPMI-7951, Jurkat cells)
[170,171]
Carotenoids↑↑↑B- and T-lymphocyte proliferation
↑↑↑Macrophage activity
↑↑↑Cytotoxic T-cells and effector T-cell function
↑↑↑Cytokines
Breast, cervical, ovarian, and
Colorectal cancers
In vivo (SJL/J mice)[172,173]
β-carotene↑↑↑CD4+ T-cell
↑↑↑NK cells
↑↑↑Cells with markers for IL-2 activation
↑↑NK cell cytotoxicity and total T-cells
Gastric, cervical, prostate,
breast, colon cancers, and leukemia
In vivo (SJL/J mice)[169,174]
Lycopene↑↑Blood IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TNF-α levels
↑↑Blood IgA, IgG and IgM levels
↓↓↓IL-6
Prostate, breast, and lung cancersIn vivo (female Wistar rats)
In vitro (cell lines MCF-10a, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, HBL-100)
[6]
β-carotene and Lycopene↑↑CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ cells
↑↑β cells and T-helper cells (CD4+ total cell numbers)
↑↑ IgG
Breast adenocarcinomaIn vivo (SJL/J mice)[175]
Flavonoids
(chalcones, flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, flavanols, anthocyanins)
↑↑ T regulatory subset
↓↓↓ mTOR activity
Breast, stomach, and lung cancersIn vivo (SJL/J mice)[6]
Luteolin↑↑↑COX-2
↓↓↓Total cell, neutrophil, eosinophil counts
↓↓↓IL-4
↓↓↓IFN-γ
↓↓↓ TNF-α
↓↓↓ T-cell proliferation and antigen-specific
↓↓↓ Mast cell histamine secretion
Breast cancerIn vivo (C57BL/6 mice)
In vitro (cell lines TC-1, B16, B16E7)
[6]
Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate↑↑CD8+ and CD4+ T cell-mediated immune responsesHead and neck, breast, prostate, stomach, esophagus, colon, pancreas, skin, lung cancers [176]
The upwards arrows indicate upregulation and the downwards arrows indicate downregulation.
Table 5. Ongoing clinical trials on phytochemical efficacy in cancer treatment.
Table 5. Ongoing clinical trials on phytochemical efficacy in cancer treatment.
Study TypePhtochemical (s)CancerRefs.
Study with Human ParticipantsAllium sativumColorectal, liver, pancreatic cancer[212,213]
Colon adenoma
Phase I Clinical TrailCurcumin alone, curcumin + quercetinPancreatic cancer[188]
Oral leukoplakia[189]
Cervical intraepithelial neo-plasia[188]
Multiple myeloma[189]
Advanced colorectal cancer[189]
Phase II Clinical TrialCurcuminAberrant crypt foci[161]
Study with Human Participants Resveratrol
  • Reduced insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF-binding protein 3 in the plasma, inhibited tumor formation, and metastasis.
  • Decreased cytochrome P450 and CYP3A4 levels, and increased CYP1A2 in the plasma of healthy person
[172]
Phase II Clinical TrailGreen TeaProstate cancer[198]
Study with Human Participantsβ-carotene, α-tocopherol, seleniumGastric cancer[199]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paudel, S.; Mishra, N.; Agarwal, R. Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Molecules in Cancer Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121652

AMA Style

Paudel S, Mishra N, Agarwal R. Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Molecules in Cancer Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(12):1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paudel, Sandeep, Neha Mishra, and Rajesh Agarwal. 2023. "Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Molecules in Cancer Therapeutics" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 12: 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121652

APA Style

Paudel, S., Mishra, N., & Agarwal, R. (2023). Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Molecules in Cancer Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals, 16(12), 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop