Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Host–Microbiota Interactions in Autophagy and the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Biochemical Markers of the Sex-Specific Sensitivity to Epileptogenic Factors, Delayed Consequences of Seizures and Their Response to Vitamins B1 and B6 in a Rat Model
Previous Article in Journal
Emerging Applications of Nanotechnology in Healthcare Systems: Grand Challenges and Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Celecoxib Decrease Seizures Susceptibility in a Rat Model of Inflammation by Inhibiting HMGB1 Translocation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/ph14080706
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines’ Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain

by
Cesar Emmanuel Santana-Gómez
1,†,
Daniel Pérez-Pérez
2,†,
Daniel Fonseca-Barriendos
3,
Oscar Arias-Carrión
4,
Walter Besio
5,* and
Luisa Rocha
3,*
1
Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
Plan of Combined Studies in Medicine (PECEM), Faculty of Medicine, UNAM, México City 04510, Mexico
3
Pharmacobiology Department, Center for Research and Advanced Studies, México City 14330, Mexico
4
Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Secretaria de Salud, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
5
Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(8), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080706
Submission received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 2 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 21 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epilepsy and Neurodegeneration: Current Therapeutic Implications 2021)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Transcranial focal stimulation (TFS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation strategy with neuroprotective effects. On the other hand, 6-hidroxidopamine (6-OHDA) induces neurodegeneration of the nigrostriatal system producing modifications in the dopaminergic, serotoninergic, and histaminergic systems. The present study was conducted to test whether repetitive application of TFS avoids the biogenic amines’ changes induced by the intrastriatal injection of 6-OHDA. Experiments were designed to determine the tissue content of dopamine, serotonin, and histamine in the brain of animals injected with 6-OHDA and then receiving daily TFS for 21 days. Tissue content of biogenic amines was evaluated in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and striatum, ipsi- and contralateral to the side of 6-OHDA injection. Results obtained were compared to animals with 6-OHDA, TFS alone, and a Sham group. The present study revealed that TFS did not avoid the changes in the tissue content of dopamine in striatum. However, TFS was able to avoid several of the changes induced by 6-OHDA in the tissue content of dopamine, serotonin, and histamine in the different brain areas evaluated. Interestingly, TFS alone did not induce significant changes in the different brain areas evaluated. The present study showed that repetitive TFS avoids the biogenic amines’ changes induced by 6-OHDA. TFS can represent a new therapeutic strategy to avoid the neurotoxicity induced by 6-OHDA.

1. Introduction

The electrical modulation of the brain induced by strategies such as deep brain stimulation and vagal nerve stimulation has been considered an alternative treatment to control neurological disorders such as Parkinson´s disease and pharmacoresistant epilepsy [1,2,3]. However, these strategies of neuromodulation are invasive and have high economical costs [4,5].
On the one hand, transcranial focal stimulation (TFS) applied via tripolar concentric ring electrodes (TCREs) is a non-invasive strategy of neuromodulation that induces inhibitory and neuroprotective effects. TFS decreases the expression of the convulsive activity produced by pilocarpine, penicillin, and pentylenetetrazole [6,7,8,9]. TFS combined with sub-effective doses of diazepam reduces the incidence of mild and severe generalized pilocarpine-induced seizures, an effect associated with lower neuronal damage [10]. We recently found that TFS avoids the P-glycoprotein overexpression induced after an acute convulsive seizure and enhances the phenytoin effects in an experimental model of drug-resistant seizures [11]. The neuroprotective effects of TFS have been associated with lessened evoked glutamate release in vivo [12].
On the other hand, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) is a toxin used to induce selective damage of catecholaminergic neurons and neurodegeneration of the nigrostriatal system [13]. The neurotoxicity induced by 6-OHDA is explained by the oxidative stress that results from the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a consequence of its auto-oxidation [14]. This condition associated with augmented free calcium can lead to cell death [15]. 6-OHDA is widely used to reproduce some of Parkinson’s disease signs as a result of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, apoptosis [16], and loss of dopaminergic neurons in the brain area injected [17].
In addition to the disruption of dopaminergic neurotransmission, 6-OHDA also modifies the neurotransmission mediated by other biogenic amines. The bilateral medial forebrain bundle 6-OHDA injection reduces serotonin tissue levels in the striatum [18]. 6-OHDA significantly augments histamine content in different brain areas (hypothalamus, hippocampus, and medulla oblongata) [19], a condition that facilitates neurodegeneration induced by the toxin [20].
It is described that neuromodulation strategies modify the neurotransmission mediated by histamine [21], serotonin, and dopamine [22]. The present study was designed to support the hypothesis that repetitive application of TFS can reduce the neurotoxic effects induced by 6-OHDA. Experiments were designed to evaluate the tissue content of dopamine, serotonin, and histamine in different brain areas of animals treated with an intrastriatal injection of 6-OHDA and subsequent repetitive application of TFS.

2. Results

2.1. TFS Did Not Alter the Tissue Content of Biogenic Amines

The Sham group showed the following tissue content values of biogenic amines expressed in µM/mg of protein, ipsi- and contralateral to the place of vehicle injection: a) dopamine: striatum, 186 ± 18 and 229 ± 20, respectively; cortex, 11.6 ± 1.8 and 24.2 ± 4.3; hippocampus, 12.5 ± 1 and 15 ± 1.7, respectively; amygdala, 13.9 ± 2.3 and 18.3 ± 1.2, respectively; b) serotonin: striatum, 57 ± 3 and 62.9 ± 6.2, respectively; cortex, 57.9 ± 7.5 and 68.6 ± 9; hippocampus, 56.6 ± 13 and 70.1 ± 6.1, respectively; amygdala, 157.4 ± 23 and 174 ± 10, respectively; c) histamine: striatum, 14.4 ± 1.6 and 13.6 ± 1.2, respectively; cortex, 11.8 ± 0.7 and 14.2 ± 1.6; hippocampus, 14 ± 1.1 and 14.2 ± 1.7, respectively; amygdala, 12.7 ± 0.7 and 14.3 ± 1.4, respectively. TFS did not induce behavioral changes during its repetitive application to the TFS group. The tissue content of dopamine, serotonin, and histamine in the different brain areas of the TFS group was similar to the Sham group (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). These results suggest that TFS does not modify the normal brain function.

2.2. Intrastriatal Administration of 6-OHDA Modifies the Brain Tissue Content of Biogenic Amines

In contrast to the Sham group, animals from the 6-OHDA group showed a lower tissue content of dopamine in all the brain areas evaluated. This effect was more evident in the striatum, ipsi- and contralateral to the 6-OHDA administration (96% and 97%, respectively, p < 0.0001 vs Sham group) (Figure 1). Similarly, the tissue content of serotonin was lower in all cerebral structures analyzed (Figure 2). Concerning histamine and when compared with the Sham group, the 6-OHDA group presented high tissue content in ipsilateral striatum (80%, p < 0.0001), cortex (76%, p < 0.0006), and hippocampus (48%, p < 0.01); as well as bilateral amygdalae (ipsi- 82%, p < 0.0009; contra- 60%, p < 0.01). The experiments also revealed low histamine tissue content in the contralateral striatum (45%, p < 0.006) (Figure 3). According to the results obtained, 6-OHDA induces significant changes in the tissue content of biogenic amines in different brain areas, ipsi- and contralateral to a lesion.

2.3. TFS Modifies the Changes in the Tissue Content of Biogenic Amines Induced by the Intrastriatal Administration of 6-OHDA

Animals from the 6-OHDA-TFS group showed similarly low levels of dopamine tissue content in the striatum, ipsi- and contralateral to the side of toxin injection, when compared with the 6-OHDA group. However, the results obtained revealed that the other brain areas evaluated presented tissue content of dopamine similar to the Sham group. Indeed, the hippocampus and amygdala showed a significantly high tissue content of dopamine when compared with the 6-OHDA group (Figure 1).
The 6-OHDA-TFS group showed low serotonin tissue content in all the brain areas evaluated. However, when compared with the 6-OHDA group, higher values were detected in ipsi- and contralateral striatum (p < 0.02 and p < 0.05, respectively), as well as contralateral cortex (p < 0.001) and hippocampus (p < 0.001) (Figure 2).
Concerning histamine tissue content, animals from the 6-OHDA-TFS group presented values similar to the Sham group. When compared with the 6-OHDA group, lower values were detected in ipsilateral cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala (p < 0.03, p < 0.05, and p < 0.004, respectively) and contralateral amygdala (p < 0.02) (Figure 3).
The results obtained from the 6-OHDA-TFS group indicate that TFS applied daily for 2 h per day for 21 days does not avoid the loss of dopamine in the lesioned striatum. However, it protected peripheral structures from changes in biogenic amines induced by the toxin.

3. Discussion

The present study results indicate that the repetitive application of TFS for 21 days in normal animals did not modify the tissue content of dopamine, serotonin, and histamine in the different brain areas evaluated. However, repetitive TFS application avoids some of the long-term changes induced by the intrastriatal injection of 6-OHDA in biogenic amines in the striatum, cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala.
It is known that the dopamine and serotonin tissue levels in the striatum and other brain areas such as the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus, decrease as a consequence of 6-OHDA intrastriatal injection [23,24,25]. 6-OHDA selectively destroys dopaminergic neurons due to its high affinity to the dopamine transporter [26,27]. 6-OHDA can also destroy adjacent cells as a result of the formation of ROS [16,27]. This situation explains the simultaneous changes in dopamine and serotonin in different brain areas induced by 6-OHDA. In contrast, we found that 6-OHDA induces enhanced tissue levels of histamine in different brain areas. This effect is similar to the results previously reported by other authors in rats [19,28] and patients with Parkinson’s Disease [29,30]. The high tissue content of histamine may contribute to the neuroinflammation process produced by the toxin administration [31].
Our results reveal that the repetitive application of TFS for 21 days avoided some of the changes of the biogenic amines tissue content induced by the striatal injection of 6-OHDA. These protective effects are similar to those induced by other strategies of neuromodulation. Deep brain stimulation improves the survival of dopaminergic neurons and avoids alterations in the tissue content of dopamine and serotonin in patients with Parkinson’s Disease [22]. Likewise, direct current stimulation applied for 4 weeks prevents the depletion of dopaminergic neurons induced by 6-OHDA, improving the motor alterations in the animals [32].
In the present study, animals receiving 6-OHDA and TFS showed a higher tissue content of dopamine in the different evaluated brain areas, when compared with the 6-OHDA group. Similarly, neuromodulation strategies such as high-frequency stimulation in 6-OHDA lesioned rats augment the extracellular levels of dopamine in the striatum [33].
It is known that behavioral and mood alterations in patients with Parkinson´s Disease are associated with reduced plasma levels of serotonin, suggesting its low neurotransmission [34]. Studies indicate that deep brain stimulation decreases serotoninergic neurotransmission [35,36,37]. Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, a strategy used to reduce motor dysfunction in Parkinson´s disease patients, results in more evident behavioral and mood alterations [38,39]. This evidence supports that deep brain stimulation exacerbates the reduced serotoninergic neurotransmission associated with Parkinson´s Disease. In the present study, we found that rats from the 6-OHDA-TFS group showed higher tissue content of serotonin in contrast with the 6-OHDA group. Our results support that TFS is more effective than deep brain stimulation to avoid serotonin changes induced by 6-OHDA.
Studies indicate that high histamine levels in arkinsonian basal ganglia circuitry represent a compensatory mechanism for regulating the firing patterns of subthalamic neurons and decreasing motor dysfunction [40]. Nevertheless, the increased levels of histamine in other brain areas could lead to neuroinflammation with a consequent neuronal degeneration found in neurological disorders such as Parkinson´s disease [31]. Indeed, it is known that 90% of the histamine in brain areas such as the hippocampus is released from mast cells [41] that participate in neuroinflammation and cell damage [42,43]. In the present study, we found that TFS avoids the increased levels of histamine-induced by 6-OHDA in the ipsilateral striatum, cortex, and hippocampus and bilateral amygdalae. These results suggest that TFS represents a neuroprotective strategy in the 6-OHDA lesioned rats.
It is also important to mention that the repetitive application of TFS in normal animals did not produce changes in the brain tissue content of the biogenic amines evaluated. In contrast, the repetitive application of transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the striatal dopamine levels in control rats [44]. This group of evidence supports that TFS represents a good neuromodulatory strategy to avoid the toxic effects of 6-OHDA in the brain.
The unilateral application of 6-OHDA induces cell death and oxidative stress [45], both of these phenomena could be associated with changes in the biogenic amines. The present study presents important limitations for possible clinical implications of the TFS. One limitation is the lack of behavioral and histological evaluation. Future studies should be carried out to test whether TFS can avoid the behavioral and cellular changes induced by 6-OHDA. Another important limitation is that there was a limited number of animals used for each experimental group. Although this situation restricts the significance of the data obtained, the effects of TFS on the tissue levels of biogenic amines are evident.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

Adult male Wistar rats, initially weighing 250–300 g, were individually housed at 22 °C and maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle. Animals had free access to food and water. According to the Mexican Official Standard (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and the Ethical Committee of the Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Protocol #175/15 with approval date of 04/05/2016), the present study was carried out.

4.2. Surgery and Intrastriatal Injection of 6-OHDA

Rats were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (80 mg/kg, i.p.) and xylazine (20 mg/kg, i.m.). Through a trepan in the skull, an intrastriatal injection of 6-OHDA was applied (4 μg/μL in ascorbic acid 0.01%, 0.9% de NaCl, total 4 μL). The toxin was injected slowly (0.5 μL /min) into the right striatum (AP, +0.7 mm from Bregma; lateral 3.8 mm; ventral from the dura 5.0 mm). Then, a 6 mm diameter TCRE attached to male connector pins was placed centered on the cranium, 5 mm behind Bregma. Four stainless steel screws were threaded into the cranium over the frontal and cerebellar cortices and the electrode assembly was affixed to the skull with dental acrylic. Animals were allowed to recover for 2 days before any further manipulation.

4.3. Experimental Groups

6-OHDA-TFS group (n = 6). Two days after implanting and injection with 6-OHDA, animals received TFS daily for 2 h per day for 21 days. TFS consisted of 200 µs symmetrical biphasic square charge-balanced constant current pulses at a rate of 300 Hz and an intensity of 100 µA. TFS was applied through the outer ring (external diameter of 6.0 mm) and the disc of a TCRE (with the middle ring floating). For this purpose, we used two Grass Technologies S48 square pulse stimulators each with an SIU-C constant current stimulus isolation unit (Grass Technologies, West Warwick, RI). One S48 provided the positive pulses and the other provided the negative pulses. The day after the last TFS, rats were killed by decapitation, and the brain was obtained. Striatum, cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus, ipsi- and contralateral to the place of 6-OHDA injection, were dissected and immediately stored in polypropylene Eppendorf tubes at -70 °C.
6-OHDA group (n = 6). Rats were manipulated as indicated previously for the 6-OHDA-TFS group, except that they did not receive TFS.
TFS group (n = 6). Rats were manipulated as indicated previously for the 6-OHDA-TFS group, except that they received an intrastriatal injection of the vehicle instead of 6-OHDA.
Sham group (n = 6). Rats were manipulated as indicated previously for the 6-OHDA group, except that they received an intrastriatal injection of the vehicle instead of toxin.

4.4. Evaluation of Tissue Content of Biogenic Amines by Chromatography

Brain tissue samples (10–100 mg each) were homogenized on ice in 90 µL HClO4 0.1 M using a tissue homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and the resulting supernatant was filtrated by a Nalgene-nylon 0.45 µm filter and stored at −70 °C until use.
Then, 20 μL of the stored sample was injected into the solvent stream of a high-performance liquid chromatography system. Dopamine and serotonin levels were eluted using a reversed-phase column (C18, 3 μm; 2.1 × 50 mm; Atlantis, Waters®, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a pre-column (Atlantis, Waters®, Milford, MA, USA) and mobile phase solution containing sodium acetate 25 mM, EDTA 0.01 mM; citric acid 25 mM and 1-octane sulfonic acid 1 mM dissolved in milli-Q water and mixed with acetonitrile in a proportion of 95:5, pH 3.35 ± 0.05 at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. Dopamine and serotonin detection was performed by a single-channel electrochemical detector (Waters® model 2465, Milford, MA, USA) at 450 mV at 30 °C.
For histamine levels, 15 μL of the sample was mixed with 10 μL OPA-NAC solution pH 9.3 ± 0.05 [46] in a vial. It was eluted using a reversed-phase column (C18, 4 μm; 3.9 × 150 mm; Nova-Pak, Waters®, Milford, MA, USA). A Ternary elution system was employed in a gradient flow with aqueous acetate phosphate buffer pH 5.05 ± 0.05 (eluent A), HPLC grade acetonitrile (eluent B), and milli-Q water (eluent C) [47]. The detection of histamine was performed by fluorescence detector (Waters® model 474, Milford, MA, USA) with an excitation wavelength of 360 nm, an emission wavelength of 450 nm, and a gain value of 100. Peak height measurements quantified all the biogenic amines against standard solutions.
The pellet obtained from the homogenization of each brain sample was resuspended in fresh NaOH 0.1 N, and protein levels were determined by the method of Bradford [48]. The obtained values allowed expressing the data resulting from the high-performance liquid chromatography in µM/mg of proteins.

4.5. Statistical Analysis and Sample Size

Previous studies indicate that six animals per group is the minimum sample size to detect significant differences in pilot studies evaluating quantitative variables [49]. According to this notion, the sample size for the present study was six rats per group.
Values were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test. In all statistical comparisons, p < 0.05 was used as the criterion for significance.

5. Conclusions

TFS is a non-invasive neuromodulatory strategy with neuroprotective effects that also avoids most of the neurochemical abnormalities caused by the intrastriatal injection of 6-OHDA in the dopaminergic, serotoninergic, and histaminergic systems. Further research is needed to determine if TFS is able to protect the animals from the motor dysfunction and cell damage induced by the toxin.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.B., C.E.S.-G., O.A.-C., and L.R.; methodology, C.E.S.-G., D.P.-P., O.A.-C., and D.F.-B.; formal analysis, L.R.; resources, W.B. and L.R.; data curation, C.E.S.-G. and D.P.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P.-P. and L.R.; writing—review and editing, D.P.-P., W.B., and L.R.; supervision, W.B. and L.R.; project administration, W.B. and L.R.; funding acquisition, W.B. and L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, grants number R21NS061335 and R21TW009384.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Mexican Official Standard (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and the Ethical Committee of the Center for Research and Advanced Studies (Protocol #175/15).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the technical support of Francia Carmona-Cruz for the HPLC experiments. This study was partially supported by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT, scholarship No. 622940 given to D.P.-P. and scholarship No. 489736 given to D.F.-B.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edwards, C.A.; Kouzani, A.; Lee, K.H.; Ross, E.K. Neurostimulation Devices for the Treatment of Neurologic Disorders. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2017, 92, 1427–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Vizcarra, J.A.; Situ-Kcomt, M.; Artusi, C.A.; Duker, A.P.; Lopiano, L.; Okun, M.S.; Espay, A.J.; Merola, A. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation and levodopa in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis of combined effects. J. Neurol. 2019, 266, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, B.; Xu, J. Deep brain stimulation for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an emphasis on alleviation of seizure frequency outcome. Childs. Nerv. Syst. 2018, 34, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dang, T.T.H.; Rowell, D.; Connelly, L.B. Cost-Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation With Movement Disorders: A Systematic Review. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2019, 6, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Akazawa, M.; Konomura, K.; Shiroiwa, T. Cost-Minimization Analysis of Deep-Brain Stimulation Using National Database of Japanese Health Insurance Claims. Neuromodulation 2018, 21, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Besio, W.G.; Koka, K.; Cole, A.J. Effects of non-invasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. Epilepsia 2007, 48, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Besio, W.G.; Gale, K.N.; Medvedev, A.V. Possible therapeutic effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes. Epilepsia 2010, 51 (Suppl. 3), 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Besio, W.G.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Medvedev, A.V.; Koka, K. Transcutaneous focal electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes reduces synchrony induced by pentylenetetrazole in beta and gamma bands in rats. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2011, 21, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Makeyev, O.; Luna-Munguía, H.; Rogel-Salazar, G.; Liu, X.; Besio, W.G. Non-invasive transcranial focal stimulation via tripolar concentric ring electrodes lessens behavioral seizure activity of recurrent pentylenetetrazole administrations in rats. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2013, 21, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Besio, W.; Cuellar-Herrera, M.; Luna-Munguia, H.; Orozco-Suárez, S.; Rocha, L. Effects of transcranial focal electrical stimulation alone and associated with a sub-effective dose of diazepam on pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus and subsequent neuronal damage in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2013, 28, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pérez-Pérez, D.; Castañeda-Cabral, J.L.; Orozco-Suárez, S.; Sotelo, J.; Besio, W.; Rocha, L. Noninvasive transcranial focal stimulation affects the convulsive seizure-induced P-glycoprotein expression and function in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2021, 115, 107659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santana-Gómez, C.E.; Alcántara-González, D.; Luna-Munguía, H.; Bañuelos-Cabrera, I.; Magdaleno-Madrigal, V.; Fernández-Mas, R.; Besio, W.; Rocha, L. Transcranial focal electrical stimulation reduces the convulsive expression and amino acid release in the hippocampus during pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in rats. Epilepsy Behav. 2015, 49, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blandini, F.; Armentero, M.-T. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Perfeito, R.; Cunha-Oliveira, T.; Rego, A.C. Reprint of: Revisiting oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease-resemblance to the effect of amphetamine drugs of abuse. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 62, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.-T.; Li, N.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Gao, G.-D.; Wang, X.-L. 6-OHDA induced calcium influx through N-type calcium channel alters membrane properties via PKA pathway in substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 575, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hernandez-Baltazar, D.; Zavala-Flores, L.M.; Villanueva-Olivo, A. The 6-hydroxydopamine model and parkinsonian pathophysiology: Novel findings in an older model. Neurologia 2017, 32, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.Q.; Tilson, H.A.; Nanry, K.P.; Hudson, P.M.; Hong, J.S.; Stachowiak, M.K. Increased dopamine release from striata of rats after unilateral nigrostriatal bundle damage. Brain Res. 1988, 461, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eskow Jaunarajs, K.L.; George, J.A.; Bishop, C. L-DOPA-induced dysregulation of extrastriatal dopamine and serotonin and affective symptoms in a bilateral rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 2012, 218, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nowak, P.; Noras, L.; Jochem, J.; Szkilnik, R.; Brus, H.; Körossy, E.; Drab, J.; Kostrzewa, R.M.; Brus, R. Histaminergic activity in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotox. Res. 2009, 15, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, C.-Q.; Chen, Z.; Liu, F.-X.; Hu, D.-N.; Luo, J.-H. Involvement of brain endogenous histamine in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Neuropharmacology 2007, 53, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nishida, N.; Huang, Z.-L.; Mikuni, N.; Miura, Y.; Urade, Y.; Hashimoto, N. Deep brain stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus activates the histaminergic system to exert antiepileptic effect in rat pentylenetetrazol model. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 205, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Herrington, T.M.; Cheng, J.J.; Eskandar, E.N. Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 2016, 115, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, S.; Gui, X.-H.; Xue, Z.-F.; Huang, L.-P.; Fang, R.-M.; Ke, X.-H.; Li, L.; Fang, Y.-Q. Dynamic of neurochemical alterations in striatum, hippocampus and cortex after the 6-OHDA mesostriatal lesion. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2014, 36, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Branchi, I.; D’Andrea, I.; Armida, M.; Carnevale, D.; Ajmone-Cat, M.A.; Pèzzola, A.; Potenza, R.L.; Morgese, M.G.; Cassano, T.; Minghetti, L.; et al. Striatal 6-OHDA lesion in mice: Investigating early neurochemical changes underlying Parkinson’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 208, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santiago, R.M.; Barbiero, J.; Gradowski, R.W.; Bochen, S.; Lima, M.M.S.; Da Cunha, C.; Andreatini, R.; Vital, M.A.B.F. Induction of depressive-like behavior by intranigral 6-OHDA is directly correlated with deficits in striatal dopamine and hippocampal serotonin. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 259, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pantic, I.; Cumic, J.; Skodric, S.R.; Dugalic, S.; Brodski, C. Oxidopamine and oxidative stress: Recent advances in experimental physiology and pharmacology. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2021, 336, 109380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Varešlija, D.; Tipton, K.F.; Davey, G.P.; McDonald, A.G. 6-Hydroxydopamine: A far from simple neurotoxin. J. Neural Transm. 2020, 127, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brus, R.; Jochem, J.; Nowak, P.; Adwent, M.; Boroń, D.; Brus, H.; Kostrzewa, R.M. Effect of pre- and postnatal manganese exposure on brain histamine content in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotox. Res. 2012, 21, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rinne, J.O.; Anichtchik, O.V.; Eriksson, K.S.; Kaslin, J.; Tuomisto, L.; Kalimo, H.; Röyttä, M.; Panula, P. Increased brain histamine levels in Parkinson’s disease but not in multiple system atrophy. J. Neurochem. 2002, 81, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anichtchik, O.V.; Rinne, J.O.; Kalimo, H.; Panula, P. An altered histaminergic innervation of the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 163, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vizuete, M.L.; Merino, M.; Venero, J.L.; Santiago, M.; Cano, J.; Machado, A. Histamine infusion induces a selective dopaminergic neuronal death along with an inflammatory reaction in rat substantia nigra. J. Neurochem. 2000, 75, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Feng, X.-J.; Huang, Y.-T.; Huang, Y.-Z.; Kuo, C.-W.; Peng, C.-W.; Rotenberg, A.; Juan, C.-H.; Pei, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-H.; Chen, K.-Y.; et al. Early transcranial direct current stimulation treatment exerts neuroprotective effects on 6-OHDA-induced Parkinsonism in rats. Brain Stimul. 2020, 13, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. He, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, H.; Jiang, H.; Jia, W.; Sun, P.; Xie, J. High frequency stimulation of subthalamic nucleus results in behavioral recovery by increasing striatal dopamine release in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rat. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 263, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tong, Q.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, R.; Xu, Q.; Ding, J.; Li, D.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, K. Reduced plasma serotonin and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in Parkinson’s disease are associated with nonmotor symptoms. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kocabicak, E.; Jahanshahi, A.; Schonfeld, L.; Hescham, S.-A.; Temel, Y.; Tan, S. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Rat Subthalamic Nucleus Induced Inhibition of Median Raphe Serotonergic and Dopaminergic Neurotransmission. Turk. Neurosurg. 2015, 25, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Faggiani, E.; Delaville, C.; Benazzouz, A. The combined depletion of monoamines alters the effectiveness of subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 82, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tan, S.K.H.; Hartung, H.; Visser-Vandewalle, V.; Steinbusch, H.W.M.; Temel, Y.; Sharp, T. A combined in vivo neurochemical and electrophysiological analysis of the effect of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on 5-HT transmission. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 233, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Navailles, S.; De Deurwaerdère, P. Contribution of serotonergic transmission to the motor and cognitive effects of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012, 45, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tommasi, G.; Lanotte, M.; Albert, U.; Zibetti, M.; Castelli, L.; Maina, G.; Lopiano, L. Transient acute depressive state induced by subthalamic region stimulation. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 273, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhuang, Q.-X.; Li, G.-Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, C.-Z.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Xi, K.; Li, H.-Z.; Wang, J.-J.; Zhu, J.-N. Regularizing firing patterns of rat subthalamic neurons ameliorates parkinsonian motor deficits. J. Clin. Invest. 2018, 128, 5413–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Panula, P.; Pirvola, U.; Auvinen, S.; Airaksinen, M.S. Histamine-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the rat brain. Neuroscience 1989, 28, 585–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kempuraj, D.; Thangavel, R.; Natteru, P.A.; Selvakumar, G.P.; Saeed, D.; Zahoor, H.; Zaheer, S.; Iyer, S.S.; Zaheer, A. Neuroinflammation Induces Neurodegeneration. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Spine 2016, 1, 1003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Valle-Dorado, M.G.; Santana-Gómez, C.E.; Orozco-Suárez, S.A.; Rocha, L. The mast cell stabilizer sodium cromoglycate reduces histamine release and status epilepticus-induced neuronal damage in the rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology 2015, 92, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kanno, M.; Matsumoto, M.; Togashi, H.; Yoshioka, M.; Mano, Y. Effects of acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dopamine release in the rat dorsolateral striatum. J. Neurol. Sci. 2004, 217, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baluchnejadmojarad, T.; Mansouri, M.; Ghalami, J.; Mokhtari, Z.; Roghani, M. Sesamin imparts neuroprotection against intrastriatal 6-hydroxydopamine toxicity by inhibition of astroglial activation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 88, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kutlán, D.; Molnár-Perl, I. New aspects of the simultaneous analysis of amino acids and amines as their o-phthaldialdehyde derivatives by high-performance liquid chromatography. Analysis of wine, beer and vinegar. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 987, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.; Sañuda-Peña, M.C.; Harvey-White, J.D.; Kalra, S.; Cohen, S.A. Determination of submicromolar concentrations of neurotransmitter amino acids by fluorescence detection using a modification of the 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate method for amino acid analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 828, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kruger, N.J. The Bradford method for protein quantitation. Methods Mol. Biol. 1994, 32, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Allgoewer, A.; Mayer, B. Sample size estimation for pilot animal experiments by using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2017, 45, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of TFS on the changes in dopamine tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Tissue content ipsi- and contralateral to the toxin injection or vehicle is expressed as µM/mg of protein. Sham, animals with vehicle injection; TFS, animals receiving TFS daily for 21 days; 6OH, rats injected with 6-OHDA; 6-OH-TFS, animals receiving repetitive TFS after 6-OHDA injection. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Figure 1. Effects of TFS on the changes in dopamine tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Tissue content ipsi- and contralateral to the toxin injection or vehicle is expressed as µM/mg of protein. Sham, animals with vehicle injection; TFS, animals receiving TFS daily for 21 days; 6OH, rats injected with 6-OHDA; 6-OH-TFS, animals receiving repetitive TFS after 6-OHDA injection. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g001
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of TFS on the changes in serotonin tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Notations as in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; **** p < 0.0001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Figure 2. Effects of TFS on the changes in serotonin tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Notations as in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; **** p < 0.0001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g002
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of TFS on the changes of histamine tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Notations as in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; **** p < 0.0001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group; @@@ p < 0.001 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Figure 3. Effects of TFS on the changes of histamine tissue content induced by 6-OHDA in different brain areas. Notations as in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs Sham group; ** p < 0.01 vs Sham group; *** p < 0.001 vs Sham group; **** p < 0.0001 vs Sham group; @ p < 0.05 vs 6-OHDA group; @@ p < 0.01 vs 6-OHDA group; @@@ p < 0.001 vs 6-OHDA group. The results obtained were analyzed with ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey test.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00706 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santana-Gómez, C.E.; Pérez-Pérez, D.; Fonseca-Barriendos, D.; Arias-Carrión, O.; Besio, W.; Rocha, L. Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines’ Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080706

AMA Style

Santana-Gómez CE, Pérez-Pérez D, Fonseca-Barriendos D, Arias-Carrión O, Besio W, Rocha L. Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines’ Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(8):706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santana-Gómez, Cesar Emmanuel, Daniel Pérez-Pérez, Daniel Fonseca-Barriendos, Oscar Arias-Carrión, Walter Besio, and Luisa Rocha. 2021. "Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines’ Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 8: 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080706

APA Style

Santana-Gómez, C. E., Pérez-Pérez, D., Fonseca-Barriendos, D., Arias-Carrión, O., Besio, W., & Rocha, L. (2021). Transcranial Focal Electrical Stimulation Modifies Biogenic Amines’ Alterations Induced by 6-Hydroxydopamine in Rat Brain. Pharmaceuticals, 14(8), 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop