Hydrostatic Pressure as a Sensing and Control Parameter for Fission-Nuclear Process †
Highlights
- Possibility for generation and control of the chain reaction with hydrostatic pressure is proposed;
- As pressure grows, the probability for a more substantial amount of neutrons from nuclei strongly increases;
- An instrumented titanium high-pressure chamber was designed, built and validated up to approximately 2 × 105 atm using a weakly compressible inert surrogate fluid.
- The chamber provides the experimental platform required to test a proposed sensor effect in which hydrostatic pressure acts as an impact control for fission-material systems;
- Reduction in critical mass in chain reaction and diminution of nuclear fuel.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Operating Principle
2.2. Sensor Effect Through Hydrostatic Pressure in Nuclear Processes
3. Chamber Design for Implementation of the Physical Effect
3.1. Actuation
3.2. Sensing Suite
3.3. Surrogate Fluid and Test Protocol
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Greenspan, E. Encyclopedia of Nuclear Energy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mohanakrishnan, P.; Singh, O.P.; Umasankari, K. Physics of Nuclear Reactors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; p. 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuclear Energy Agency. Innovation in Nuclear Energy Technology; NEA № 6103; OECD: Paris, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Meshik, A.P. The working of an ancient nuclear reactor. Sci. Am. 2005, 293, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Advanced Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), US Department of Energy. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/ne/advanced-small-modular-reactors-smrs (accessed on 14 April 2026).
- Lozanova, S.V.; Ivanov, A.J.; Roumenin, C.S. A New sensor effect for nuclear process control. In Proceedings of the XXXVII EUROSENSORS Conference, Wroclaw, Poland, 7–10 September 2025; pp. 460–461. [Google Scholar]
- Landsberg, G.S. Atomic nuclei and nuclear energy. In Physics, 4th ed.; M. Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1966; Chapter XXII. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.C. Nuclear Reactor Physics and Engineering; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; p. 324. [Google Scholar]
- Massie, M.; Dewan, L.C.; Wilcox, R.; Short, M. TransAtomic Power Corp. Wo Patent Wo2014039641A2, 13 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Balband-Celerier, F.; Cabet, C. Materials and Progress for Nuclear Energy Today and the Future; ISTE Ltd.: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- NuScale Power LLC. Small Modular Nuclear Reactor. U.S. Patent US 2016148709 A1, 26 May 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Round, K.J. Nuclear Power Source. U.S. Patent US3678303A1, 18 July 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Yacout, A.; Pellin, M.; Billone, M. Coating of Nuclear Fuel Cladding Materials, Method for Coating Nuclear Fuel Cladding Materials. U.S. Patent US 102 762 68, 30 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ruomu, M. Development and application of nuclear fusion. Theor. Nat. Sci. 2023, 13, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozanova, S.V.; Ralchev, M.L.; Roumenin, C.S. Device for Nuclear Energy. Bulgaria Patent BG 67678 B1, 29 November 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Brandt, N.B.; Chudinov, S.M. Electron Structure of Metals; Moscow University Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 1973; p. 332. [Google Scholar]
- Eliezer, S.; Schweitzer, Y.; Nissim, N.; Martinez Val, J.M. Mitigation of the stopping power effect on proton-boron11 nuclear fusion chain reactions. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 573694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumonteil, E.; Bahran, R.; Cutler, T.; Dechenaux, B.; Grove, T.; Hutchinson, J.; McKenzie, G.; McSpaden, A.; Monange, W.; Nelson, M.; et al. Patchy nuclear chain reactions. Commun. Phys. 2021, 4, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, J.N.; Thisse, D.; Lebois, M.; Jovančević, N.; Gjestvang, D.; Canavan, R.; Rudigier, M.; Étasse, D.; Gerst, R.-B.; Gaudefroy, L.; et al. Angular momentum generation in nuclear fission. Nature 2021, 590, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bulgac, A.; Jin, S.; Stetcu, I. Nuclear fission dynamics: Past, present, needs, and future. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekström, A. Analyzing the nuclear interaction: Challenges and new ideas. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boller, P.; Zylstra, A.; Neumayer, P.; Bernstein, L.; Brabetz, C.; Despotopulos, J.; Glorius, J.; Hellmund, J.; Henry, E.A.; Hornung, J.; et al. First on-line detection of radioactive fission isotopes produced by laser-accelerated protons. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bender, M.; Bernard, R.; Bertsch, G.; Chiba, S.; Dobaczewski, J.; Dubray, N.; Giuliani, S.A.; Hagino, K.; Lacroix, D.; Li, Z.; et al. The future of nuclear fission theory. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.10216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlovych, V.M.; Babenko, V.A. On the possibility of the self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction inside the “Shelter” object at the present time. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2023, 24, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakranov, N.; Kuli, Z.; Nagel, D.; Bakranova, D. Nanomaterials engineering for enhanced low energy nuclear reactions: A comprehensive review and future prospects. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1500487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schacherl, B.; Maurer, K.; Schäfer, M.; Remde, Y.; Geyer, F.; Fried, A.; Happel, S.A.; Benešová-Schäfer, M. Concept validation of separations for thorium-based radionuclide generator systems for medical application. Front. Nucl. Eng. 2024, 3, 1379996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spieker, M.-C.; Almaraz-Calderon, S. Nuclear structure and direct reaction studies in particle-γ coincidence experiments. Front. Phys. 2024, 12, 1511394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietralla, N. Photons and nuclear structure. Eur. Phys. J. A 2024, 60, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palit, R.; Laskar, S.R.; Nag, S.; Choudhury, D.; Goel, N.; Singh, S.; Mishra, S.N. Review of isomers in the A ≈ 135 region and nuclear shape evolution. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2024, 233, 933–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Yang, X.; Sakurai, H.; Hu, B. Physics of exotic nuclei. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2025, 7, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haack, J. Superconductivity for nuclear fusion: Past, present, and future. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2025, 50, 3233–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Yang, K.J.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.-L. First-principles calculations of thermodynamic and mechanical behavior of nuclear materials. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2024, 61, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lozanova, S.; Ivanov, A.; Roumenin, C. Hydrostatic Pressure as a Sensing and Control Parameter for Fission-Nuclear Process. Sensors 2026, 26, 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092602
Lozanova S, Ivanov A, Roumenin C. Hydrostatic Pressure as a Sensing and Control Parameter for Fission-Nuclear Process. Sensors. 2026; 26(9):2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092602
Chicago/Turabian StyleLozanova, Siya, Avgust Ivanov, and Chavdar Roumenin. 2026. "Hydrostatic Pressure as a Sensing and Control Parameter for Fission-Nuclear Process" Sensors 26, no. 9: 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092602
APA StyleLozanova, S., Ivanov, A., & Roumenin, C. (2026). Hydrostatic Pressure as a Sensing and Control Parameter for Fission-Nuclear Process. Sensors, 26(9), 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092602

