Next Article in Journal
A Physics-Guided Quantitative GPR Framework for Detecting Hanging Sleepers in Ballasted Railway Tracks
Previous Article in Journal
UMLoc: Uncertainty-Aware Map-Constrained Inertial Localization with Quantified Bounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Implementation of a Flexible Chipless RFID Coding Tag Based on Eyeball Structure

1
College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
2
Comprehensive Support Center of the Department of Industry and Information Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010098, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(6), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061903
Submission received: 2 February 2026 / Revised: 4 March 2026 / Accepted: 11 March 2026 / Published: 18 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Electronic Sensors)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • A bio-inspired chipless RFID tag based on an eyeball-like multi-ring resonant structure is proposed, enabling joint frequency-shift and graphic coding through branch modulation.
  • Within the effective operating bandwidth, the designed flexible tag achieves an encoding capacity exceeding 45 bits while maintaining a compact structure on a polyimide substrate.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • The eyeball-inspired hierarchical resonator architecture provides a new design paradigm for high-density chipless RFID encoding under limited spectral resources.
  • The demonstrated bending and rotation tolerance indicates suitability for flexible and wearable identification applications where mechanical deformation is unavoidable.

Abstract

In this paper, inspired by the structural characteristics of the human eyeball, a bionically designed circular resonant structure is proposed, and a flexible chipless radio frequency identification (RFID) tag based on this concept is developed. By selectively adding or removing branch structures, the proposed tag achieves controllable resonant frequency shifts and distinguishable geometric pattern variations. Fabricated on a polyimide substrate with a compact size of 20 × 26 × 0.2 mm3, the tag achieves a coding capacity exceeding 45 bits while operating within an effective frequency bandwidth in 4–12 GHz, realizing a synergistic improvement in coding capacity and structural compactness under limited spectrum constraints. Simulation analyses are performed to investigate the encoding stability of the tag under various bending and rotational conditions relevant to flexible applications. Experimental results obtained under the unbent condition are consistent with the simulations, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed chipless RFID tag.

1. Introduction

Chipless radio frequency identification (RFID) technology has attracted increasing attention due to its low fabrication cost, elimination of silicon chips, and suitability for large-scale deployment. Compared with conventional chipped RFID systems, chipless RFID tags generally offer longer operational lifetimes and better adaptability to flexible substrates and harsh environments [1,2]. However, because information encoding relies on passive resonant structures, the coding capacity, physical size, and spectral occupation of chipless RFID tags are often mutually constrained, posing challenges for high-density encoding under limited spectral resources [3,4,5]. With the rapid development of wireless communication technologies and the increasing scarcity of available frequency bands, achieving compact tag size while maintaining high coding capacity has become a key issue in chipless RFID tag design.
To address these challenges, extensive research has been conducted on encoding methods for chipless RFID tags. In chipless tag design, tags with special graphic features are usually encoded based on frequency. The structural parameter value of the tag corresponds to a unique resonant frequency to achieve specific coding. A tag designed with Latin alphabet characters proposed in paper [6] can achieve unique identification with high accuracy. In paper [7], multiple QR code resonators were printed on FR4 substrate on a single side, and coded information was retrieved and identified using a frequency-domain reflection method. Paper [8] realizes frequency shift keying coding through small metal units, proposes chipless tags based on genetic algorithm optimization technology, producing a series of RFID tags with QR code appearance. In paper [9], the open-loop resonator with fragment-loading structure was applied to the design of chipless tags for the first time, which was coded by the distribution of fragment patches in the open-loop resonator. Paper [10] proposed a design scheme for embedding chipless tags in QR codes, where the resonant frequency can be adjusted to encode by removing or loading the square modules.
Mixed coding is one of the most effective methods to improve coding capacity at present. In paper [11], a mixed-coding tag is designed by using a microstrip spiral multi-resonator and a cross-polarized microstrip ultra-wideband disk monopole antenna. In paper [12], a U-shaped resonance structure was applied to achieve 22.9-bit coding capacity on a 2 × 4 cm2 FR4 substrate. In paper [13], the tag with an 8-bit coding capacity was designed by using the open-circuit stub connected to the microstrip transmission line. Tags have a compact structure and are encoded in a mixture of amplitude and delay. In paper [14], several concentric nested square rings were used to design and realize the tag with 10-bit encoding capacity. Paper [15] designed a tag printed on a 48 × 48 mm2 PET substrate with five improved complementary open-loop resonators, achieving a 19-bit coding capacity.
To overcome the limitations of conventional regular geometric structures in chipless RFID tag design, bio-inspired design concepts have attracted increasing attention in recent years [16,17]. Previous studies have shown that bio-inspired structural modeling approaches have been widely applied in antenna design, achieving favorable results in terms of size reduction, bandwidth enhancement, and electromagnetic performance optimization [18,19]. Therefore, by abstracting and reconstructing natural biological structures, extending bio-inspired structural modeling to chipless RFID tag design can help expand design flexibility and provide new insights into improving encoding performance under limited spectral resources.
Based on this research background, biological structures with multifunctional and hierarchical characteristics offer a feasible reference for the design of high-capacity chipless RFID tags. In this paper, a flexible chipless RFID coding tag inspired by the human eyeball is proposed. By combining graphic coding and frequency-shift coding, the presence or absence of branches is utilized to control resonant frequency variations and pattern changes. As a result, the proposed design reduces spectral occupation while increasing encoding capacity, achieving 45 bits within 4–12 GHz.

2. Resonance Structure Design and Analysis

In this paper, a chipless RFID tag based on an eyeball structure is proposed based on bionic thought. As shown in Figure 1, the eye anatomy is pictorially abstracted and simplified [19] to form three resonant sub-structures. Structures I and II are cornea–pupil-inspired ring resonators that encode information by adding or removing radial branches to generate distinct frequency shifts and patterns. Structure III is an eyelid-orbit-inspired orbital resonator that provides an additional tunable resonance to enlarge the coding space. These three parts constitute a hierarchical hybrid coding architecture for tag identification.
First, Resonant Structure I is designed by mimicking the cornea–pupil region and its surrounding area, as shown in Figure 1. The white circular slot in the middle is used to simulate the pupil, and it has little effect on the resonant frequency of the resonant structure. Its main function is to mark the direction of the resonant structure. Figure 2 shows S21 of the resonant structure. The resonant frequency is affected by the branch length L2 and the ring radius R1. The structure is a double resonant structure, but only one resonant frequency point is in the frequency band range required by the design, and the two resonant frequency points have similar changes with the structure, so only the first resonant frequency point is used for coding.
Figure 3 shows the current distribution and electric field distribution of the resonant structure at 11 GHz. The current distribution in the outer ring of the resonant structure is the same as that in the traditional ring resonant structure. And the current converges from the outer ring to the inner ring, and the intensity of the inner current is obviously lower than that of the outer ring. According to the electric field distribution diagram, the outer ring electric field of the eyeball resonance structure I is strong, and the intensity is strongest at the upper and lower vertices of the ring.
The eyeball resonance structure I contains multiple radial-shaped branches. When excited, each branch generates a different induced current and electric field, so different resonant frequencies are obtained when different branches are removed or added. Each branch is unique and clearly identifiable. Therefore, tag encoding can be realized by both a frequency domain and a graph. The combination of the two methods can effectively improve the reliability of tag reading. Figure 4 shows the resonant frequencies corresponding to removing branches 1~12. In fact, the eyeball resonance structure I has 24 branches. According to the simulation results, it can be seen that some branches, such as “1” and “3”, have the same resonant frequency, so it is necessary to remove these repeated branches in coding.
To further extend the encoding capability, resonant structure II is designed, as shown in Figure 5a. Similar to the coding method of eyeball resonance structure I, the coding method of eyeball resonance structure II also adopts the addition and removal of branches. According to the current distribution shown in Figure 5b, it can be seen that resonant structure II and resonant structure I have similar current characteristics. The current distribution is significantly affected by the position of the feeding point and the ratio of the ring circumference to the wavelength. The current reaches its maximum value at the feeding point, while at 90°/270°, the current is at its minimum. This distribution indicates that the current intensity is a function of angle, reaching its maximum near the feeding point and monotonically decreasing to its minimum as the angle changes. Therefore, adding branches within 360° of the inner circle of the circular structure can adjust the resonance situation. The resonance frequencies corresponding to the tags after removing different branches are analyzed by simulation, as shown in Figure 6. Starting from the branches at the highest point of the ring, the code is successively coded in the counterclockwise direction 1~16. It can be seen from the simulation results that each branch corresponds to a different resonant frequency, that is, corresponding to a different frequency shift size.
In addition to the ring-based resonant structures, an orbital-shaped resonant structure is introduced to emulate the eyelid region of the eye, as shown in Figure 7a. The structure is the most external of the whole design, and the available physical area is larger, so the coding by changing the radius to change the resonant frequency is less limited.
The simulation model is established in electromagnetic simulation software, and the values of radius and resonance structure are changed to obtain the result shown in Figure 8. The resonant frequency of the resonant structure changes regularly with R and R-L. The relationship between them can be described by Equations (1) and (2):
f = A 1 × R 2 + A 2 × R A 3 ( 9 R 11 )
where A1 = 0.29, A2 = 4.865, A3 = 13.73, R2 = 0.97443 (Unit: mm).
f = B 1 × ( R L ) 2 + B 2 ( 3.5 R L 5.5 )
where B1 = 0.872, B2 = 9.664, R2 = 0.971 (Unit: mm).
Specifically, as R increases from 9 mm to 11 mm, the resonant frequency decreases following a quadratic trend described by Equation (1). Similarly, as the opening R-L increases from 3.5 mm to 5.5 mm, the resonant frequency also decreases according to Equation (2). These results indicate that both the overall size and the effective gap of the resonant unit can be used to precisely tune the resonant frequency. Therefore, adjusting R and R-L provides a reliable method to design coding tags with desired frequency characteristics.

3. Code Tag Design

3.1. Encoding Tag Structure

By integrating the previously proposed bio-inspired resonant structures, the circular patch is changed into rings with different radii nested together to construct coding tags. The structure of the tag is shown in Figure 9, and the main structural parameters and dimensions of the tag are shown in Table 1. It is composed of four layers of resonant units in concentric nesting mode. The tag uses 0.2 mm-thick polyimide material with a relative permittivity of 3.1 and a loss tangent of 0.002 as the substrate, and its overall size is 20 × 26 mm2.

3.2. Analysis of Coding Performance of the Tag in the Bending State

In order to study the reliability of the flexible chipless coded tag designed in this paper after bending by force, the influence of different bending degrees on the performance of the tag is simulated and analyzed. As shown in Figure 10, bend the tag along the X and Y axes to different degrees. Where Rx and Ry are the distances between the center of the tag side and the origin of the coordinate when the tag is bent along the X and Y axes. Bend the tag in different degrees to obtain S21, as shown in Figure 11.
According to the simulation results, when the tag is bent along the X-axis, the offset degree of the four resonant frequency points increases with the increase in the bending angle. Comparing the four resonant troughs, the frequency offset of the first resonant frequency points after bending is the largest, and the fourth one is the smallest. This is because during the bending process, the outer ring resonant structure is subjected to the maximum bending degree, while the inner ring structure is subjected to the minimum bending degree. When the tag is bent along the Y-axis, the offset degree of the resonant frequency points of the inner ring resonance structure is larger than that of the tag bent along the X-axis. The offset degree of the resonant trough of the outer ring resonant structure is smaller than that of the X-axis bending. Although different bending directions affect the resonant structures at different layers, the resonant frequency points remain distinguishable.

3.3. Analysis of Coding Performance in Different Polarization Directions

In order to verify the influence of different polarization directions on tag encoding performance, the S21 of tags at different rotation angles were simulated and compared. Rotate the tag 60° clockwise as shown in Figure 12.
According to the simulation results, when the tag rotates in the clockwise direction of 0°~35°, the four resonant points almost have no deviation. When the rotation continues to 60°, the tag generates more interference frequency points, and the offset of each frequency point increases to more than 100 MHz, resulting in the reading error of the encoded tag. In the case of counterclockwise rotation, the overall variation in S21 with rotation angle is similar to that in the case of clockwise rotation, but the interference resonance trough will occur earlier. These results indicate that, within a moderate rotation range, the resonant frequency points remain distinguishable, which is sufficient for identifying the encoded information.

4. Encoding Principle of the Tag

The tag realizes both frequency shift and image change through the presence or absence of each branch. In this way, the accuracy of tag reading in the line-of-sight range is double guaranteed. It can not only read the frequency of the tag by way of backscattering, but also judge the coding information by image recognition.
To maintain a consistent interrogation band, the operating range used for coding is set to 4–12 GHz. In decoding, each code state is identified by extracting the notch frequencies from the S21 response. Two code states are regarded as distinguishable when their resonance frequencies are separated by at least 100 MHz, and the notch depth satisfies a predefined detection criterion under noise. For the overall coding capacity, Structures I and II adopt branch-based binary encoding; after excluding duplicated branches that yield indistinguishable responses, Structure I retains 12 effective branches and Structure II provides 16 branch positions, resulting in 44 bits from Structures I and II. Structure III provides two resolvable geometric states within 4.0–5.5 GHz, contributing 1 bit. Therefore, the overall coding capacity reaches 45 bits, which is theoretical and simulation-based in this work. Figure 13 shows the simulated responses of five representative tags, and the corresponding resonance frequencies used for decoding are summarized in Table 2.

5. Measurement

As shown in Figure 14, the network analyzer is used as the reader of the tag, and the horn antenna with a bandwidth of 2~12 GHz is used as the transmitting and receiving antenna, connected to the two ports of the vector network analyzer (Keysight E5063A) to build the S21 parameter test platform.
Figure 15 is a physical view of the tag. Figure 16 shows the measured results after eliminating the test background. The results show that when the test distance is close, the resonant frequency amplitude of S21 is higher, but the amplitude of the interference background is also higher. When the reading distance becomes longer, the amplitude of the S21 interference background obtained is small, but the amplitude of the resonant frequency also becomes smaller, and the frequency shift becomes larger.
The simulation results of the labels were compared with the measurement results, as shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17. It can be seen that the measurement and simulation are basically consistent. When the testing distance is 16 cm, the offset of the high-frequency resonance point (10–12 GHz) reaches 45 MHz. The frequency stability of the 12 GHz reading antenna is relatively poor, resulting in differences between the measured results and simulation results. Therefore, in the test, the distance between the antenna and the tag will be controlled within 16 cm, which is sufficient for most application scenarios. Meanwhile, due to the fact that the actual testing environment is not an ideal space, the signal experiences greater attenuation during the radiation process, resulting in a decrease in amplitude. So, compared with the simulation results, the S21 amplitude obtained from the test is smaller than the simulation data. In addition, due to limited technological capabilities, there may be a difference of ±10% in the accuracy of label production, which can also lead to insufficient resonance amplitude loss and frequency deviation.
A comparison with previously reported chipless RFID tags is summarized in Table 3. Compared with the designs in [21,22,23,24], the proposed tag achieves a higher encoding capacity while maintaining a compact physical size. In paper [21], three circular structures are combined to design a clover-shaped resonant structure, and the designed tag can achieve 10-bit coding capacity on RT/Duroid5880 substrate. The tag frequency range proposed in paper [22] is the smallest, but the deficiency is that the tag size is large. In contrast, the proposed tag adopts a circular ring resonant structure with a compact size of 2.0 × 2.6 cm2, while providing an encoding capacity exceeding 45 bits.

6. Conclusions

This paper proposes a chipless RFID tag inspired by the eyeball structure based on a bionic design concept. By abstracting and simplifying the structural characteristics of the pupil, iris, and eyelid of the eyeball, resonant units composed of ring structures and radial branches are constructed, enabling a dual-domain encoding mechanism that combines frequency-shift coding and image-based coding through the addition or removal of branches. The proposed tag at 4~12 GHz with an encoding capacity exceeding 45 bits. An encoding density of 8.654 bit/cm2 was achieved, reflecting its performance in terms of area utilization and spectral efficiency. Simulation and experimental results are generally consistent, validating the feasibility of the proposed design.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang), Z.W., and Z.Z. (Zhonghui Zhao); methodology, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang); software, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang); validation, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang) and Y.H.; formal analysis, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang).; investigation, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang) and Y.H.; resources, Z.W.; data curation, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang) and Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z. (Zhonghui Zhao) and Z.W.; visualization, Z.Z. (Zhen Zhang); supervision, Z.W. and Z.Z. (Zhonghui Zhao); project administration, Z.W.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. (Zhonghui Zhao) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shandong Province Science Foundation for Youths, grant number ZR202111100132; Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, grant number ZR2024MD120; and the Science and Technology Support Plan for Youth Innovation of Colleges and Universities in Shandong Province of China, grant number 2023KJ096.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Costa, F.; Genovesi, S.; Borgese, M.; Michel, A.; Dicandia, F.A.; Manara, G. A review of RFID sensors, the new frontier of internet of things. Sensors 2021, 21, 3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Preradovic, S.; Karmakar, N.C. Chipless RFID: Bar code of the future. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2010, 11, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lai, F.-P.; Chen, Y.-S. A fully ISM-band chipless RFID tag with hybrid encoding for micro-scale asset identification. IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif. 2025, 9, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, Z.; Dong, S.; Huangfu, J.; Ran, L.; Ye, D. High data capacity chipless RFID tag based on time-domain scattering modulation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 4920–4924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ardehshiri, A.; Soltanian, F.; Moradkhani, M.; Nosrati, M. Enhancing micro-pump efficiency: Multi-objective optimization of low voltage mems switches for drug delivery applications. Digit. Tech. Res. Appl. 2024, 3, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, T.; Tedjini, S.; Perret, E.; Vena, A. A frequency signature based method for the RF identification of letters. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on RFID, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–14 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vardhan, S.H.; Sivadasan, N.; Dutta, A. QR-code based chipless RFID system for unique identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications, Hong Kong, China, 7–9 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Betancourt, D.; Barahona, M.; Haase, K.; Schmidt, G.; Huebler, A.; Ellinger, F. Design of printed chipless-RFID tags with QR-code appearance based on genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 2190–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Sidén, J.; Wang, G. Design of chipless RFID tag by using miniaturized open-loop resonators. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, X.; Tao, Y.; Sidén, J.; Wang, G. Design of high-data-density chipless RFID tag embedded in QR code. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Preradovic, S.; Karmakar, N.C. Design of chipless RFID tag for operation on flexible laminates. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2010, 9, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vena, A.; Perret, E.; Tedjini, S. Chipless RFID tag using hybrid coding technique. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2011, 59, 3356–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nijas, C.M.; Dinesh, R.; Deepak, U.; Rasheed, A.; Mridula, S.; Vasudevan, K.; Mohanan, P. Chipless RFID tag using multiple microstrip open stub resonators. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4429–4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Costa, F.; Genovesi, S.; Monorchio, A. A chipless RFID based on multiresonant high-impedance surfaces. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2013, 61, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jalil, M.; Rahim, M.; Mohamed, H.; Samsuri, N.A.B.; Murad, N.A.; Dewan, R.; Nugroho, B.S. High capacity and miniaturized flexible chipless RFID tag using modified complementary split ring resonator. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 33929–33943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srivardan, B.; Singh, T.K.; Naachimuthu, S.; Santhoshbharadhan, B.; Das, T.K. Design of a Koch-fractal inspired monopole antenna for C-band and RFID applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology for Sustainable Development (ICRAIS), Manipal, India, 17–18 December 2025; pp. 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharif, A.; Kumar, R.; Althobaiti, T.; Alotaibi, A.A.; Safi, L.; Ramzan, N.; Abbasi, Q.H. Bio-inspired circular-polarized UHF RFID tag design using characteristic mode analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 10847–10855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Azam, F.; Shah, S.I.H.; Bashir, S.; Koziel, S. Review of recent advancement on nature/bio-inspired antenna designs. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 37493–37512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Acharya, A.P.; Das, T.K.; Shaw, T. Design and analysis of compact flower-shaped wideband slotted monopole antenna for RFID reader applications. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2023, 169, 154718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Man Blue Eyes Photography. Available online: https://www.pexels.com/zh-cn/photo/890550/ (accessed on 10 January 2026).
  21. Mishra, D.P.; Behera, S.K. Passive RFID transponders based on SRR and Koch-island fractal for bit-coding enhancement. In Proceedings of the Advanced Communication Technologies and Signal Processing (ACTS), Rourkela, India, 15–17 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tariq, N.; Riaz, M.A.; Shahid, H.; Khan, M.J.; Khan, M.S.; Amin, Y.; Tenhunen, H. Orientation independent chipless RFID tag using novel trefoil resonators. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 122398–122407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, Y.-H.; Lai, F.-P.; Chen, Y.-S. Orientation-insensitive chipless RFID achieved in multiple rotational degrees freedom. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 5266–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vena, A.; Perret, E.; Tedjini, S. High capacity chipless RFID tag insensitive to the polarization. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4509–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pictograph and simplification of the eyeball structure [20].
Figure 1. Pictograph and simplification of the eyeball structure [20].
Sensors 26 01903 g001
Figure 2. Resonance structure I based on the eyeball: (a) structure chart; (b) S21 parameters.
Figure 2. Resonance structure I based on the eyeball: (a) structure chart; (b) S21 parameters.
Sensors 26 01903 g002
Figure 3. Current distribution and electric field distribution of resonance structure I at 11 GHz: (a) current distribution; (b) electric field distribution.
Figure 3. Current distribution and electric field distribution of resonance structure I at 11 GHz: (a) current distribution; (b) electric field distribution.
Sensors 26 01903 g003
Figure 4. Resonant frequency characteristics of the eyeball resonance structure I with different branches removed: (a) schematic diagram of the structure I with branch numbering; (b) simulated S21 responses corresponding to the removal of branches.
Figure 4. Resonant frequency characteristics of the eyeball resonance structure I with different branches removed: (a) schematic diagram of the structure I with branch numbering; (b) simulated S21 responses corresponding to the removal of branches.
Sensors 26 01903 g004
Figure 5. Resonance structure II based on the eyeball: (a) structure chart; (b) current distribution.
Figure 5. Resonance structure II based on the eyeball: (a) structure chart; (b) current distribution.
Sensors 26 01903 g005
Figure 6. Resonant frequency responses of eyeball resonance structure II with individual branches removed: (a) structural schematic of the structure II with branch numbering; (b) simulated S21 responses corresponding to frequency shifts.
Figure 6. Resonant frequency responses of eyeball resonance structure II with individual branches removed: (a) structural schematic of the structure II with branch numbering; (b) simulated S21 responses corresponding to frequency shifts.
Sensors 26 01903 g006
Figure 7. Resonance structure III based on orbital: (a) structural schematic of the structure III; (b) simulated S21.
Figure 7. Resonance structure III based on orbital: (a) structural schematic of the structure III; (b) simulated S21.
Sensors 26 01903 g007
Figure 8. Resonant frequency of the orbit-shaped resonant structure as a function of (a) radius R; (b) opening R-L.
Figure 8. Resonant frequency of the orbit-shaped resonant structure as a function of (a) radius R; (b) opening R-L.
Sensors 26 01903 g008
Figure 9. Chipless RFID tag based on the eyeball structure with four concentric resonant layers (substrate thickness H = 0.2 mm, size 20 × 26 mm2).
Figure 9. Chipless RFID tag based on the eyeball structure with four concentric resonant layers (substrate thickness H = 0.2 mm, size 20 × 26 mm2).
Sensors 26 01903 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the bending state of the coding tag: (a) the tag is bent along the X-axis; (b) the tag is bent along the Y-axis.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the bending state of the coding tag: (a) the tag is bent along the X-axis; (b) the tag is bent along the Y-axis.
Sensors 26 01903 g010
Figure 11. Simulated S21 responses of the coding tag under different bending conditions: (a) tag bent along the X-axis; (b) tag bent along the Y-axis.
Figure 11. Simulated S21 responses of the coding tag under different bending conditions: (a) tag bent along the X-axis; (b) tag bent along the Y-axis.
Sensors 26 01903 g011
Figure 12. Effect of rotation on the coding tag performance: (a) schematic diagram of the tag rotated 60° clockwise; (b) simulated S21 response under different rotated conditions.
Figure 12. Effect of rotation on the coding tag performance: (a) schematic diagram of the tag rotated 60° clockwise; (b) simulated S21 response under different rotated conditions.
Sensors 26 01903 g012
Figure 13. Simulated S21 responses corresponding to five groups of coding tags.
Figure 13. Simulated S21 responses corresponding to five groups of coding tags.
Sensors 26 01903 g013
Figure 14. Measurement environment: (a) the distance is 16 cm; (b) the distance is 8 cm.
Figure 14. Measurement environment: (a) the distance is 16 cm; (b) the distance is 8 cm.
Sensors 26 01903 g014
Figure 15. Photograph of a chipless coded tag.
Figure 15. Photograph of a chipless coded tag.
Sensors 26 01903 g015
Figure 16. Measurement results after background removal: (a) the distance is 8 cm; (b) the distance is 16 cm.
Figure 16. Measurement results after background removal: (a) the distance is 8 cm; (b) the distance is 16 cm.
Sensors 26 01903 g016
Figure 17. Comparison between tag simulation results and measurement results.
Figure 17. Comparison between tag simulation results and measurement results.
Sensors 26 01903 g017
Table 1. Structural parameters of the eyeball-based coding tag.
Table 1. Structural parameters of the eyeball-based coding tag.
ParametricLWHR1R2R3
/mm20260.2345.3
ParametricR4R5L1L2L3A
/mm6.80.50.80.81.210
Table 2. Resonant frequencies corresponding to five groups of tags.
Table 2. Resonant frequencies corresponding to five groups of tags.
TagResonant Frequency/GHz
Tag 14.6556.38.137511.305
Tag 24.6556.21258.15511.305
Tag 34.6556.24758.207511.3225
Tag 44.7786.3188.137511.4975
Tag 54.696.28258.137511.305
Table 3. Comparison of different types of chipless RFID tags.
Table 3. Comparison of different types of chipless RFID tags.
Ref.StructureBandSize (cm2)SubstrateCapacity
[21]Square open ring1.5~6.7 GHz2.4 × 2.4FR43 bits
[22]Clover-shaped slot5.4~10.4 GHz1.35 × 1.35RT/duroid588010 bits
[23]Circular ring slot2.0~4.0 GHz4.0 × 4.0RO40036.97 bits
[24]Circular ring3.1~10.6 GHz3.0 × 3.0RO400319 bits
[15]MCSRR0.9~2.7 GHz4.8 × 4.8PET19 bits
This WorkCircular ringPiecewise2.0 × 2.6PI45 bits
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Z. Design and Implementation of a Flexible Chipless RFID Coding Tag Based on Eyeball Structure. Sensors 2026, 26, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061903

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Hu Y, Zhao Z, Wang Z. Design and Implementation of a Flexible Chipless RFID Coding Tag Based on Eyeball Structure. Sensors. 2026; 26(6):1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhen, Yan Hu, Zhonghui Zhao, and Zhuopeng Wang. 2026. "Design and Implementation of a Flexible Chipless RFID Coding Tag Based on Eyeball Structure" Sensors 26, no. 6: 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061903

APA Style

Zhang, Z., Hu, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026). Design and Implementation of a Flexible Chipless RFID Coding Tag Based on Eyeball Structure. Sensors, 26(6), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop