Next Article in Journal
Bio-Inspired Swarm Navigation on Resource-Constrained Robots for GPS-Denied Environments
Previous Article in Journal
An On-Board Shock Absorber Detection Method for General Aviation Aircraft Landing Gears
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Study of Incidence Angle-Tuned, Guided-Mode Resonant, Metasurfaces-Based Sensors for Glucose and Blood-Related Analytes Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tailorable 2D MoS2 via Oxide Sulfidation for Photodetection and Contact Engineering

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Microelectronics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
2
Department of Microelectronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City 88157, Taiwan
3
Department of Photonics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(11), 3523; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113523
Submission received: 9 May 2026 / Revised: 26 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 2 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optoelectronic Devices and Sensors)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Controllable Oxide-to-Sulfide Synthesis: A scalable fabrication strategy was developed using RF magnetron sputtering of MoO3 precursors followed by precise chemical-vapor sulfidation to produce high-quality, thickness-tunable MoS2 films with uniform interlayer spacing.
  • Environment-Induced Negative Photoconductivity: The research identified the emergence of negative photoconductivity in bilayer MoS2 under ambient conditions, attributed to electron-trapping states from molecular adsorption and surface oxidation rather than structural traps.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Contact Engineering for Performance Enhancement: Low-temperature thermal annealing of Ni electrodes effectively optimizes the metal-semiconductor interface and improves effective carrier injection, significantly enhancing the photocurrent of 2D optoelectronic devices.
  • Unified Design Strategy for 2D Sensors: These findings provide critical insights into how surface adsorption and interfacial properties govern carrier transport, offering a robust framework for engineering high-performance and scalable TMD-based sensing technologies.

Abstract

To address contact-limited transport commonly encountered in two-dimensional semiconductors, this study fabricated few-layer two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) films on sapphire substrates via controllable oxide-to-sulfide conversion. Combined sputtering deposition of molybdenum trioxide and precise chemical-vapor sulfidation afforded high-quality, high-uniformity, and thickness-tunable MoS2. The resulting films exhibit distinct differences in the frequencies of the Raman modes, consistent elemental ratios, and uniform interlayer spacing of ~0.65 nm. The MoS2-based devices exhibit robust photodetection with microampere-scale photocurrents. Bilayer MoS2 exhibited negative photoconductivity under ambient atmosphere, which is hypothesized to be linked to environment-induced surface doping and molecular adsorption rather than permanent structural traps. Contact engineering via mild thermal annealing of Ni electrodes significantly enhanced the photocurrent by improving effective interfacial carrier injection. These findings underscore the oxide sulfidation strategy as a scalable approach for engineering the layer-dependent behavior of transition metal dichalcogenides for optoelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

The thickness of two-dimensional (2D) materials can be reduced to a single or a few atomic layers, resulting in unique physical, chemical, and electronic properties. The groundbreaking isolation of graphene in 2004 by Geim and Novoselov marked a pivotal moment in materials science, ushering in the era of 2D materials [1]. This discovery not only won them the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2010 but also ignited extensive research into other 2D materials, including transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), which have since become central to advancements in the next generation of semiconductor devices [2].
TMDs, exemplified by molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), tungsten disulfide (WS2), MoSe2, WSe2, MoTe2, WTe2, NbS2, NbSe2, and TaS2 [3,4,5], are layered materials with the chemical formula MX2 (M is a transition metal: Mo, W, Ti, Ta, or Nb, and X is a chalcogen element such as S, Se, or Te). The structure of these materials comprises strong in-plane covalent bonds and weak out-of-plane van der Waals interactions, enabling their exfoliation into monolayers having direct bandgaps ranging from 1 to 2 eV, high optical absorption, and strong light-matter interactions, making them highly attractive for electronic, optoelectronic, and sensing applications [6,7,8,9].
MoS2 and WS2 have emerged as the most widely studied and practically relevant TMDs. MoS2 exhibits high electron mobility, a tunable bandgap (~1.2–1.8 eV depending on the layer number), and strong photoluminescence, making it advantageous for photodetectors, field-effect transistors, and chemical sensors. Recent reports have further shown that MoS2 photoconductivity and conductance can be strongly affected by adsorbates, temperature, pressure, and chemical-vapor exposure, highlighting the importance of surface-controlled carrier transport in MoS2 devices [7,8]. WS2-based devices can achieve improved durability and reliability arising from the slightly larger bandgap (~1.3–2.0 eV) and excellent chemical and mechanical stability of WS2, especially in harsh environments [9,10]. High-quality monolayers and few-layer films of both materials, which are highly suitable for experimental studies, can be obtained using scalable methods such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition.
The synthesis and characterization of monolayer TMDs have been extensively studied, driven by their theoretically exceptional carrier mobility and high optical responsivity. However, the practical realization of large-area, high-quality monolayers remains extremely challenging. Issues such as precise thickness control, defect formation (e.g., sulfur vacancies and grain boundaries), substrate mismatch, film discontinuity, and transfer-related contamination degrade the electronic and optical performance of monolayer TMD devices [11]. Consequently, these devices often exhibit unstable current transport, high contact resistance, and poor reproducibility, limiting their scalability for real-world applications.
Recent studies have indicated a paradigm shift from an exclusive focus on monolayers to bilayer and few-layer TMDs. The synthesis of bilayer and few-layer films having higher crystallinity and improved continuity is relatively facile. Moreover, interlayer coupling enhances charge transport in these materials by reducing defect scattering. For instance, bilayer WS2 contacts significantly reduce contact resistance in MOSFETs, enabling stable operation for over one year [10]. Similarly, lateral heterostructures based on bilayer WS2–MoS2 and WS2–WSe2 exhibit superior photoresponsivity and faster response times compared to monolayer devices [12]. In gas sensing, few-layer MoS2 films or hybrid nanostructures demonstrate higher sensitivity and faster recovery owing to their enhanced conductivity and adsorption stability [13]. Furthermore, benchmarking studies of large-area monolayer MoS2 and WS2 field-effect transistors reveal mobility values of 30–40 cm2V−1s−1, despite significant device-to-device variability, emphasizing the practical advantages of few-layer films [11].
In this work, we focus on the coupled roles of film thickness, ambient surface adsorption, and metal-semiconductor interfaces in determining the performance of few-layer MoS2 photodetectors. The main contribution is not the isolated use of oxide sulfidation, MSM photodetectors, or annealed contacts, but the integration of these elements into a single thickness-tunable MoS2 platform. By systematically comparing monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer films, examining environment-induced negative photoconductivity, and evaluating annealing-induced improvement in carrier injection, this study provides practical insight into how surface and interface effects govern the photoresponse of scalable two-dimensional optoelectronic devices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substrate Preparation

To achieve the growth of large-area and high-quality 2D MoS2 and WS2 thin films, sapphire substrates were selected owing to their close lattice match with the target materials as well as their excellent thermal stability. The substrates were cut from 2-inch sapphire wafers into ~1 cm2 pieces with a thickness of 0.43 mm using a precision diamond blade. Prior to depositing the film, the cleaning process consisted of sequential ultrasonic baths in acetone, isopropanol, and deionized water for 5 min each to remove organic residues. The substrates were subsequently dried under a nitrogen flow and baked to eliminate residual moisture.

2.2. Film Growth

A combination of radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering and CVD was used for controllable synthesis. The film thickness was regulated by adjusting the deposition time of the transition metal oxide (TMO) precursor film. During sputtering, the deposition rate was minimized by operating under stable plasma conditions at a low RF power of 20 W. A sputtering duration of ~90 s yielded the monolayer MoS2 precursor. The oxide precursors were subsequently sulfurized in a quartz tube furnace. The schematic of the oxide-to-sulfide conversion process is illustrated in Figure 1a. Safety Note: Due to the high toxicity and flammability of H2S gas, the sulfurization process was strictly conducted in a well-ventilated setup equipped with appropriate exhaust scrubbing systems. The tube was evacuated to minimize exposure to oxygen, followed by the introduction of H2S gas at a constant pressure of 200 Torr. The reaction proceeded at 750 °C for 30 min, after which MoS2 or WS2 films were obtained.

2.3. Device Fabrication

To evaluate the optical responses of the films, metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) devices with interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) were fabricated. A bilayer electrode structure consisting of 30 nm Ni or Ti (serving as the contact layer) and 70 nm Au (as the protective overlayer) was deposited via thermal evaporation using a shadow mask. To further enhance performance and mitigate contact-related limitations, contact engineering was conducted using the bilayer MoS2 photodetector. The device was subjected to short-duration, low-temperature annealing in a vacuum environment (100–300 °C for 30–60 min) to optimize the metal-semiconductor interface. The typical MSM device architecture and IDE configuration are presented in Figure 1b.

2.4. Characterization

Electrical measurements were conducted at room temperature using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (B1500A, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a dark environment and under controlled illumination. Film properties were assessed using Raman spectroscopy (LabRAM HR, HORIBA Jobin Yvon SAS, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 532 nm excitation laser), atomic force microscopy (AFM, NT-MDT Co., Moscow, Russia), transmission electron microscopy ((JEM-2100F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan), optical microscopy (OM, Motic China Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China), and second-harmonic generation (SHG) imaging. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, JSM-7001F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) combined with TEM was further employed to verify film composition and local uniformity.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Analysis

The chemical-vapor sulfurization of transition metal oxides is represented by Equation (1):
T M O   + 3 H 2 S T M D   +   3 H 2 O   +   S
In Equation (1), Δ above the reaction arrow denotes the thermal energy supplied during the high-temperature sulfurization process. Under appropriate hydrogen sulfide flow and high-temperature conditions, the oxide film can be fully converted to a high-quality transition metal dichalcogenide film [14]. MoS2 thin films with controllable layer numbers were fabricated by the precise sputtering of a molybdenum trioxide(MoO3) precursor layer, followed by thermal sulfurization in a quartz tube furnace. The number of MoS2 layers and crystallinity were modulated by tuning the thickness and oxidation state of the MoO3 film. The overall sulfurization mechanism and pathways have been widely verified in previous studies [9,14,15,16].
For Raman spectroscopy, measurements were performed with a 532 nm excitation laser and 1800 gr/mm grating, providing a spectral resolution of approximately 0.3 cm−1. The laser spot size was approximately 1 μm, with an incident power maintained at 8 mW to prevent sample damage. Each spectrum was collected across the range of 350 cm−1 to 450 cm−1 using an acquisition time of 10 s, with 5 accumulations per measurement to ensure data reliability and consistency across all samples.
The Raman spectra of the MoS2 thin films of varying thicknesses (Figure 2) show two distinct characteristic phonon modes, E2g1 (~386.36 cm−1) and A1g (~405.55 cm−1), confirming the formation of MoS2. The frequency difference Δ(A1g − E2g1) increases with layer number, consistent with previous reports [17]. For monolayer MoS2, the difference of ~19 cm−1 indicates weak interlayer coupling. Table 1 summarizes the characteristic phonon-mode peaks and the corresponding peak separations for different layers of MoS2.
It can be observed that the Raman peak intensity increases with layer number. Therefore, it is inferred that the layer thickness significantly influences film quality. Although Raman intensity alone cannot directly represent the crystallinity of the films due to its dependence on measurement conditions, the observed trend under identical conditions, together with the OM and SHG imaging results, strongly supports the pronounced thickness-dependent continuity and uniformity of the MoS2 films.
AFM measurements were further performed to evaluate the surface morphology and roughness of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2 films (Figure 3). Here, Rq represents the root-mean-square roughness, which is sensitive to larger height deviations. In contrast, Ra represents the arithmetic average roughness, which describes the average absolute surface-height deviation from the mean plane. The measured Rq/Ra values were 0.34/0.24 nm for monolayer MoS2, 0.131/0.0856 nm for bilayer MoS2, and 0.209/0.114 nm for trilayer MoS2, respectively. All Rq and Ra values are smaller than the ~0.65 nm thickness/interlayer spacing of monolayer MoS2, confirming the smooth surface morphology and high thin-film quality of the oxide-sulfidized samples. Notably, the monolayer film exhibits slightly higher roughness than the bilayer and trilayer films, consistent with the more pronounced island-like domains and grain boundaries observed in monolayer samples. The lower roughness of the bilayer and trilayer films indicates that MoS2 films with two or more layers exhibit improved continuity and surface quality compared with the monolayer film.
As shown in Figure 4a, cross-sectional TEM images of monolayer MoS2 revealed atomically ordered lattice fringes with a uniform interlayer spacing of approximately 0.65 nm, consistent with the typical d-spacing of MoS2 [18]. For further analysis, cross-sectional samples of bilayer and few-layer MoS2 were prepared, and TEM analysis is shown in Figure 4b,c, verifying that the number of layers can indeed be controlled by adjusting the thickness of the initial oxide precursor. These cross-sectional TEM observations provide direct thickness verification complementary to the Raman peak-separation analysis.
To verify the quality differences between monolayer and multilayer MoS2 films synthesized via oxide sulfurization and to account for the odd-layer requirement for SHG measurements, monolayer and trilayer MoS2 samples were subsequently prepared and characterized by OM and SHG analyses.
Figure 4d,e present the OM images of monolayer and trilayer MoS2 films grown on sapphire, respectively. The brighter regions correspond to the MoS2 films, while the darker regions represent the sapphire substrate. In the monolayer sample, numerous small MoS2 domains and pronounced grain boundaries are clearly visible, forming island-like features. This result indicates that monolayer MoS2 is relatively difficult to grow into a continuous large-area film. In contrast, the trilayer MoS2 sample exhibits a more uniform and continuous film morphology over a larger area, suggesting that thicker MoS2 layers facilitate the formation of large-area, continuous films.
Figure 4f,g show the SHG mapping images of monolayer and trilayer MoS2 on sapphire, respectively. The bright and dark regions indicate the presence and absence of detectable MoS2 films, respectively. Consistent with the OM observations, the SHG results further confirm that multilayer MoS2 exhibits improved large-area film continuity compared with monolayer MoS2.
Although monolayer films are difficult to grow over large areas, few-layer films exhibit excellent continuity and quality, as confirmed by OM and SHG comparisons.
EDS analysis of the elemental ratios (Figure 5) was performed at four different locations on a representative bilayer MoS2 sample. The bilayer sample was selected because it exhibited the best photodetection performance among the three layer numbers and therefore served as the key device structure for subsequent analysis. The measured Mo/S ratios were consistent with the stoichiometry of MoS2, confirming successful sulfurization in the analyzed film. Notably, all four spatially separated regions exhibited highly similar elemental distributions, indicating good local compositional uniformity. Because the monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer films were prepared using the same oxide-sulfidation chemistry and their layer numbers were independently verified by Raman, TEM, and AFM analyses, the bilayer EDS result supports the compositional uniformity and conversion quality of the oxide-sulfidized MoS2 films while avoiding overreliance on EDS as the sole evidence for all layer numbers.

3.2. Device Characterization

When applying these ultra-thin films to practical macroscopic devices, film continuity becomes a critical factor. Although monolayer films generally exhibit discontinuous grain domains and higher defect densities than few-layer structures, as shown in Figure 6a, their deployment in architectures with large effective sensing areas―such as electrolyte-gated field-effect transistor [9] configurations―can mitigate these transport bottlenecks. As schematically illustrated in Figure 6b, a large contact area facilitates the formation of continuous electron pathways at the electrode interfaces, circumventing local film imperfections. This structural compensation is critical for fully exploiting the intrinsic properties of monolayer TMDs in macro-scale devices. This inference can be further supported by our previously published studies on similar WS2-based sensor devices [9]. However, for optoelectronic applications requiring high spatial resolution and fast transient responses, IDE architectures are preferred.

3.2.1. Photoconductive

The photoconductive properties of the MoS2 photodetectors utilizing IDE architectures were evaluated (Figure 7). The photocurrent of monolayer MoS2 was only in the nanoampere range, reflecting the impact of film discontinuity. In contrast, devices with bilayer and trilayer MoS2 displayed microampere-level photocurrents, with the bilayer configuration achieving the best balance between film continuity and light-induced current modulation. Under 370 nm illumination at 5 V bias, the bilayer current increased significantly, yielding a responsivity of approximately 7.6 × 10−6 A/W. Although this responsivity is lower than values reported for optimized gated MoS2 phototransistors, it is reasonable for an unpassivated MSM structure, where the net photocurrent is normalized by the total incident optical power. The relatively low responsivity is attributed to limited absorption in the few-layer channel, trap-assisted recombination at grain boundaries/adsorbates, and contact-limited carrier collection in the lateral IDE geometry. Since Figure 7 already identifies the bilayer device as the best-performing layer configuration, the current-time switching measurement in Figure 8 focuses on the bilayer device to evaluate repeated light-dark switching reproducibility without making the presentation unnecessarily redundant. The bilayer transient response showed reproducible cycling over full light-dark periods. The response and recovery times estimated from the 10–90% rise and 90–10% decay criteria were approximately 70 s and 285 s, respectively. The slow recovery is attributed to adsorbate- and trap-mediated photogating effects in the unpassivated MoS2 channel, indicating a slow surface-controlled photoconductive process rather than an intrinsic carrier-transit limitation [6,7,8,9].

3.2.2. Negative Photoconductivity

In comparison with our previous results [9] and other reports [7,8,19,20,21], it is evident that while WS2 maintained a stable photoresponse, bilayer MoS2 demonstrated a high sensitivity to ambient conditions [22,23]. In the present devices, negative photoconductivity (NPC) was most clearly observed in the bilayer MoS2 photodetector after days of exposure to ambient conditions, where illumination led to a decrease in current (Figure 9). The bilayer-specific prominence of NPC is attributed to the balance between a continuous conductive channel and strong surface sensitivity to adsorbate-induced trapping. In comparison, the monolayer device is dominated by discontinuous low-current pathways. In contrast, the trilayer device has higher baseline conductance, which may reduce the relative contribution of surface-adsorbate-induced current modulation. When the bilayer device was subsequently measured under vacuum conditions, the NPC was significantly suppressed and gradually diminished, eventually becoming negligible. The observed NPC in bilayer MoS2 after ambient exposure is consistent with previous reports [24,25] on environment-sensitive photoresponse in two-dimensional materials. Based on the conclusions reported in these studies on ambient-sensitive photoresponses, a plausible explanation is that surface oxidation and molecular adsorption introduce electron-trapping states [20,21,24,25]. We infer that under illumination, these electron-trapping states capture photogenerated electrons, generating localized charged centers that act as deep-level trap states [20,21]. Consequently, illumination paradoxically decreases the number of free carriers. These oxidized surface groups can further participate in photo-assisted redox reactions with ambient oxygen and moisture. The resulting superoxide and hydroxyl species are adsorbed on the surface of MoS2 and continue to capture electrons from the channel, establishing a self-sustaining electron-depletion cycle [24]. The proposed mechanism is supported by the prior literature and is consistent with the observed electrical behavior.

3.2.3. Contact Engineering

To optimize device performance, contact engineering was performed through thermal annealing of metal electrodes. Ti and Ni were initially selected based on the ideal band diagram model shown in Figure 10. However, prior to annealing, both contacts exhibited nearly identical electrical characteristics due to the Fermi-level pinning effect at the metal-MoS2 interface (Figure 11). In this case, interface states effectively pin the Fermi level, rendering conventional work-function matching ineffective.
To address this limitation, thermal annealing has been widely recognized as an effective strategy to minimize interfacial defects and enhance carrier injection in MoS2 devices [21,26]. This process can mitigate contact-related barriers by promoting atomic-scale rearrangement and removing fabrication residues at the metal-semiconductor interface [26]. A localized thermal annealing strategy was adopted (Figure 12). Increasing the annealing temperature up to 200 °C for 30 min led to a pronounced enhancement in photocurrent (Figure 13), indicating improved carrier injection and reduced effective device/contact-related resistance. Because the present photodetectors were fabricated using a fixed IDE geometry rather than dedicated transfer length method (TLM) structures with varied channel spacings, an independent extraction of the contact resistance Rc is not available in this study. Therefore, the annealing effect is discussed in terms of effective two-terminal device improvement rather than a TLM-derived Rc value.
However, excessive annealing (e.g., 300 °C) resulted in degradation of the On/Off ratio, likely due to interfacial reactions and structural damage [27], highlighting the importance of optimizing annealing conditions. The presented curves represent typical device behavior, and similar trends were consistently observed across multiple devices, with device-to-device variation within a reasonable range. To evaluate the uniformity and reproducibility of the proposed fabrication process, a total of 49 discrete devices were fabricated and characterized on a single substrate for each sample. After excluding a few devices that were compromised by mechanical damage or manual handling errors during the measurement process, the statistical analysis reveals exceptional consistency across the array. The variations in photoelectric parameters were within a narrow range of ±5% for each sample, as shown in Figure 14. This high degree of uniformity underscores the precision of the oxide-sulfidation technique and its potential for large-scale integration of 2D MoS2-based optoelectronics.

4. Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrates a controllable oxide-sulfidation approach for fabricating thickness-tunable few-layer MoS2 photodetectors on sapphire substrates. The combined material analyses confirm the successful formation of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer MoS2 films, with few-layer films exhibiting improved continuity and surface quality compared with monolayer MoS2. The device results reveal a clear layer-dependent photoresponse, with the bilayer MoS2 photodetector showing the best balance between film continuity and light-induced current modulation. In addition, ambient-induced negative photoconductivity was observed in bilayer MoS2 and is attributed to surface adsorption and trap-mediated photogating effects. Contact engineering through mild thermal annealing of Ni electrodes further enhanced the photocurrent by improving effective carrier injection at the metal–semiconductor interface. These findings provide a unified understanding of how film thickness, surface adsorption, and interfacial contact properties jointly govern carrier transport and photoresponse in oxide-sulfidized MoS2 films, offering practical guidelines for scalable two-dimensional optoelectronic devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-Y.K., S.-P.C. and S.-J.C.; methodology, C.-Y.K., S.-P.C. and S.-J.C.; validation, C.-Y.K., S.-P.C. and S.-J.C.; investigation, C.-Y.K., S.-P.C. and S.-J.C.; resources, S.-P.C., S.-J.C., J.-F.C. and W.-C.L.; data curation, C.-Y.K. and S.-P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-Y.K. and S.-P.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-P.C. and S.-J.C.; visualization, C.-Y.K.; supervision, S.-P.C., S.-J.C., J.-F.C. and W.-C.L.; project administration, S.-P.C., S.-J.C., J.-F.C. and W.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council under contract number NSTC 114-2221-E-992-026.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the technical support from the QuPAC Core Facilities of the Research Center for Critical Issues (RCCI), Academia Sinica (Grant No. AS-GCP-115-M01). The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of EM000800(HRTEM, JEOL JEM-2100F Cs STEM) belonging to the Core Facility Center of National Cheng Kung University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
2DTwo-dimensional
TMDsTransition metal dichalcogenides
MoS2Molybdenum disulfide
WS2Tungsten disulfide
CVDChemical vapor deposition
RFRadio frequency
TMOTransition metal oxide
MSMMetal–Semiconductor–Metal
IDEsInterdigitated electrodes
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
OMOptical microscopy
SHGSecond-harmonic generation
EDSEnergy dispersive spectroscopy
MoO3Molybdenum trioxide
NPCnegative photoconductivity

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The Rise of Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhimanapati, G.R.; Lin, Z.; Meunier, V.; Jung, Y.; Cha, J.; Das, S.; Xiao, D.; Son, Y.; Strano, M.S.; Cooper, V.R.; et al. Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Materials beyond Graphene. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11509–11539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, S.A.; Bhatia, R.; Kim, S.W. Synthesis, properties and potential applications of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Converg. 2015, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, J. Review of Applications and Research of 2D TMDCs (WS2 & MoS2). Mech. Eng. Mater. Sci. Indep. Study 2022, 191, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, W.; Cho, M.Y.; Konar, A.; Lee, J.H.; Cha, G.B.; Hong, S.C.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Jena, D.; Joo, J.; et al. High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5832–5836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Kumar, A.; Durante, O.; Sessa, A.; Faella, E.; Viscardi, L.; Intonti, K.; Giubileo, F.; Martucciello, N.; Romano, P.; et al. Temperature-dependent photoconductivity in two-dimensional MoS2 transistors. Mater. Today Nano 2023, 24, 100382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perkins, F.K.; Friedman, A.L.; Cobas, E.; Campbell, P.M.; Jernigan, G.G.; Jonker, B.T. Chemical Vapor Sensing with Monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuan, C.Y.; Chang, S.P.; Liou, G.Y.; Chang, S.H.; Chang, S.J. Fabrication and Application of Two-Dimensional Tungsten Disulfide Thin Film. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2024, 39, 2540013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jin, L.; Wen, J.; Odlyzko, M.; Seaton, N.; Li, R.; Haratipour, N.; Koester, S.J. High-Performance WS2 MOSFETs with Bilayer WS2 Contacts. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 12345–12352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sebastian, A.; Pendurthi, R.; Choudhury, T.H.; Redwing, J.M.; Das, S. Benchmarking Monolayer MoS2 and WS2 Field-Effect Transistors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, S.; Ao, Z.; Lan, X.; Yang, R.; Xie, J.; Wen, W.; Du, Y.; Lv, W.; et al. Tunable Bilayer WS2–WSe2 and WS2–MoS2 Lateral Heterostructures for Self-Powered Photodetectors. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 3456–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, X.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Chen, T.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Y. Recent Advances in MoS2-Based Nanomaterial Sensors for Room-Temperature Gas Detection. Sens. Diagn. 2023, 2, 1000–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, K.; Blizzard, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, P. Growth mechanism of largescale MoS2 monolayer by sulfurization of MoO3 film. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 075009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Salazar, N.; Beinik, I.; Lauritsen, J.V. Single-layer MoS2 formation by sulfidation of molybdenum oxides in different oxidation states on Au(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 14020–14029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weber, T.; Muijsers, J.C.; van Wolput, J.H.M.C.; Verhagen, C.P.J.; Niemantsverdriet, J.W. Basic reaction steps in the sulfidation of crystalline MoO3 to MoS2, as studied by X-ray photoelectron and infrared emission spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 14144–14150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berkdemir, A.; Gutiérrez, H.R.; Botello-Méndez, A.R.; Perea-López, N.; Elías, A.L.; Chia, C.-I.; Wang, B.; Crespi, V.H.; López-Urías, F.; Charlier, J.-C.; et al. Identification of individual layers in atomically thin MoS2 crystals using Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Chang, M.; Lin, C.; Chang, K.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.T.; Chang, C.; Li, L.; et al. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Le, T.X.H.; Esmilaire, R.; Drobek, M.; Bechelany, M.; Vallicari, C.; Cerneaux, S.; Julbe, A.; Cretin, M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphitized Carbon Electrodes for Biorefractory Pollutant Removal. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 15189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gedda, M.; Yengel, E.; Faber, H.; Paulus, F.; Kreß, J.A.; Tang, M.-C.; Zhang, S.; Hacker, C.A.; Kumar, P.; Naphade, D.R.; et al. Ruddlesden-Popper-Phase Hybrid Halide Perovskite/Small-Molecule Organic Blend Memory Transistors. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2003137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, D.; Guo, Y.; Fang, L.; Robertson, J. Sulfur vacancies in monolayer MoS2 and its electrical contacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 183113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mak, K.F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T.F. Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H. Single-Layer MoS2 Phototransistors. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gustafson, C.R.; Wines, D.; Gulian, E.; Ataca, C.; Hayden, L.M. Positive and Negative Photoconductivity in Monolayer MoS2 as a Function of Physisorbed Oxygen. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 9875–9881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tailor, N.K.; Aranda, C.A.; Saliba, M.; Satapathi, S. Negative Photoconductivity: Bizarre Physics in Semiconductors. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 2535–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kappera, R.; Voiry, D.; Yalcin, S.E.; Branch, B.; Gupta, G.; Mohite, A.D.; Chhowalla, M. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the oxide-sulfidation process for few-layer TMD growth. (b) Schematic of the fabricated MSM photodetector with IDEs.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the oxide-sulfidation process for few-layer TMD growth. (b) Schematic of the fabricated MSM photodetector with IDEs.
Sensors 26 03523 g001aSensors 26 03523 g001b
Figure 2. Raman spectra of MoS2 films with different layer numbers showing characteristic E2g1 and A1g peaks.
Figure 2. Raman spectra of MoS2 films with different layer numbers showing characteristic E2g1 and A1g peaks.
Sensors 26 03523 g002
Figure 3. AFM topography analysis of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) trilayer MoS2 films.
Figure 3. AFM topography analysis of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) trilayer MoS2 films.
Sensors 26 03523 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic and optical analysis results. Cross-sectional TEM image of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) few-layer MoS2 on sapphire. OM image of (d) monolayer and (e) trilayer MoS2 on sapphire. SHG image of (f) monolayer and (g) trilayer MoS2 on sapphire.
Figure 4. Microscopic and optical analysis results. Cross-sectional TEM image of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) few-layer MoS2 on sapphire. OM image of (d) monolayer and (e) trilayer MoS2 on sapphire. SHG image of (f) monolayer and (g) trilayer MoS2 on sapphire.
Sensors 26 03523 g004
Figure 5. EDS atomic percentages of a representative bilayer MoS2 sample measured at four different positions.
Figure 5. EDS atomic percentages of a representative bilayer MoS2 sample measured at four different positions.
Sensors 26 03523 g005
Figure 6. (a) Top view TEM image of a monolayer MoS2 sensor device. (b) Schematic of conductive pathway in a large effective sensing area configuration.
Figure 6. (a) Top view TEM image of a monolayer MoS2 sensor device. (b) Schematic of conductive pathway in a large effective sensing area configuration.
Sensors 26 03523 g006
Figure 7. Photocurrent response of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) trilayer MoS2 photodetectors under 370 nm illumination.
Figure 7. Photocurrent response of (a) monolayer, (b) bilayer, and (c) trilayer MoS2 photodetectors under 370 nm illumination.
Sensors 26 03523 g007
Figure 8. Current-time switching characteristics of the bilayer MoS2 photodetector under 370 nm illumination, showing reproducible light-dark switching cycles.
Figure 8. Current-time switching characteristics of the bilayer MoS2 photodetector under 370 nm illumination, showing reproducible light-dark switching cycles.
Sensors 26 03523 g008
Figure 9. Negative photoconductivity of bilayer MoS2 photodetector.
Figure 9. Negative photoconductivity of bilayer MoS2 photodetector.
Sensors 26 03523 g009
Figure 10. Energy band diagram illustrating ideal alignment between (a) Ti and (b) Ni contacts and two-dimensional MoS2 for forming a near-ohmic contact.
Figure 10. Energy band diagram illustrating ideal alignment between (a) Ti and (b) Ni contacts and two-dimensional MoS2 for forming a near-ohmic contact.
Sensors 26 03523 g010
Figure 11. Energy band diagram illustrating Fermi level pinning at the metal/2D MoS2 interface.
Figure 11. Energy band diagram illustrating Fermi level pinning at the metal/2D MoS2 interface.
Sensors 26 03523 g011
Figure 12. Ni-contact optimization schematic.
Figure 12. Ni-contact optimization schematic.
Sensors 26 03523 g012
Figure 13. Photocurrent response of bilayer MoS2 photodetectors under different annealing conditions: (a) as-fabricated, (b) 100 °C for 30 min, (c) 100 °C for 1 h, (d) 200 °C for 30 min, (e) 200 °C for 1 h, (f) 300 °C for 30 min, and (g) 300 °C for 1 h. The improvement is discussed as an effective two-terminal device/contact-related enhancement, as dedicated TLM structures were not fabricated.
Figure 13. Photocurrent response of bilayer MoS2 photodetectors under different annealing conditions: (a) as-fabricated, (b) 100 °C for 30 min, (c) 100 °C for 1 h, (d) 200 °C for 30 min, (e) 200 °C for 1 h, (f) 300 °C for 30 min, and (g) 300 °C for 1 h. The improvement is discussed as an effective two-terminal device/contact-related enhancement, as dedicated TLM structures were not fabricated.
Sensors 26 03523 g013
Figure 14. Distribution of dark and light current for (a) monolayer and (b) bilayer MoS2 photodetectors. (c) Responsivity distribution of bilayer MoS2 photodetectors under various annealing conditions.
Figure 14. Distribution of dark and light current for (a) monolayer and (b) bilayer MoS2 photodetectors. (c) Responsivity distribution of bilayer MoS2 photodetectors under various annealing conditions.
Sensors 26 03523 g014
Table 1. Characteristic Raman phonon-mode peaks and peak separations for different layers of MoS2.
Table 1. Characteristic Raman phonon-mode peaks and peak separations for different layers of MoS2.
Layer NumberE2g1 (cm−1)A1g (cm−1)Δ(A1g − E2g1) (cm−1)
1386.36405.5519.19
2385.35406.0620.71
3384.84406.5621.72
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuan, C.-Y.; Chang, S.-P.; Chang, S.-J.; Chen, J.-F.; Lai, W.-C. Tailorable 2D MoS2 via Oxide Sulfidation for Photodetection and Contact Engineering. Sensors 2026, 26, 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113523

AMA Style

Kuan C-Y, Chang S-P, Chang S-J, Chen J-F, Lai W-C. Tailorable 2D MoS2 via Oxide Sulfidation for Photodetection and Contact Engineering. Sensors. 2026; 26(11):3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113523

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuan, Chieh-Yu, Sheng-Po Chang, Shoou-Jinn Chang, Jone-Fang Chen, and Wei-Chih Lai. 2026. "Tailorable 2D MoS2 via Oxide Sulfidation for Photodetection and Contact Engineering" Sensors 26, no. 11: 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113523

APA Style

Kuan, C.-Y., Chang, S.-P., Chang, S.-J., Chen, J.-F., & Lai, W.-C. (2026). Tailorable 2D MoS2 via Oxide Sulfidation for Photodetection and Contact Engineering. Sensors, 26(11), 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113523

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop