3.1. Electrical Signal Response and Coefficient of PVDF Piezoelectric Sensor
As shown in
Figure S1, a calibration platform for an electromagnetic force standard source was built to simulate pulse force. The output current of the programmable power supply was adjusted to 0.01 A, 0.05 A, 0.5 A, 1.0 A, 1.5 A, 2.0 A, 4.0 A, and 8.0 A. A fixed electromagnetic force was applied to a balance, and the current was adjusted each time. Using the balance, the standard forces under corresponding electrical parameter conditions were calculated as 0.011 N, 0.056 N, 0.552 N, 1.075 N, 1.564 N, 1.984 N, 4.514 N, and 8.589 N, respectively. The relevant data are organized in
Table S1.
To determine the mathematical relationship between voltage signals and transient forces, a PVDF piezoelectric sensor coefficient testing platform was built (
Figure 2a). The output current of the programmable power supply was adjusted to a different value each time it was used. The waveforms of the piezoelectric signals were recorded by the sensor’s testing software (VK701H) under different electrical parameter conditions, and we readied the peak voltage of the piezoelectric signals. The piezoelectric coefficient of the sensor was obtained by linearly fitting the peak voltage under different standard force conditions, with the fitted line passing through the origin, and calculating the slope of the fitted line. Thus, the transient force magnitude of the laser ablation of different working mediums can be obtained by measuring the voltage signal of PVDF piezoelectric sensors. Thus, the PVDF piezoelectric sensors were successfully calibrated.
Figure 2a shows that the piezoelectric coefficient testing device of the PVDF piezoelectric sensor includes a programmable power supply (ITECH auto range to DC power supply; 60 V, 15 A, 360 W), a bracket for fixing the electromagnetic coil, an electromagnetic coil, a permanent magnet, an operating platform, a charge amplifier, a data acquisition card, and an industrial computer.
Figure 2b shows the waveform of the voltage generated by the sensor under different electromagnetic force conditions as a function of time. The piezoelectric signal response of each standard electromagnetic force (0.05–8.5 N) condition is labeled in the figure.
Figure 2c is a data diagram of the linear fitting between the peak voltage and the electromagnetic force. By adjusting the electrical parameters of the programmable power supply, a fixed standard force can be applied to the sensor. The electrical signal on the sensor is recorded on the testing software of the industrial computer through the charge amplifier and the data acquisition card. As shown in
Figure 2b, when the output current of the programmable power supply is greater than 0.05 A, the piezoelectric sensor has a clear response signal, corresponding to a standard force of 0.056 N. When the output current of the programmable power supply is greater than 0.01 A, the piezoelectric sensor shows a recognizable voltage response signal (greater than twice the background noise), corresponding to a standard force of 0.011 N (
Figure S2). When the electromagnetic standard force is less than 0.01 N, the piezoelectric signal value mixes with the back-bottom noise, and no significant response value appears, so the detection lower limit is set to 0.01 N. This lower detection limit is mainly attributable to the control of ambient noise in the vacuum chamber and the effective utilization of the stabilized platform. As shown in
Figure 2c, the peak voltage obtained by loading the corresponding standard force and electromagnetic standard force onto the PVDF piezoelectric sensor is linearly fitted, and the fitted line passes through the origin. The relationship between the peak voltage of the sensor and the standard force source is y = 0.7x, and the piezoelectric coefficient of the sensor is 0.7. The R
2 is 0.9994 and the area of the green dashed line is the error bar chart. Therefore, the transient force value generated via the laser ablation of a working medium can be calculated based on the peak voltage of the PVDF piezoelectric sensor being tested. When the electromagnetic force is greater than 8.5 N, the increased piezoelectric signal change is not obvious and does not increase linearly with an increase in electromagnetic force. When the electromagnetic force is set to 9.5 N, the peak voltage of the piezoelectric signal is about 6 V, which is slightly higher than the value (5.9 V) of the voltage signal response when the electromagnetic force is 8.5 N (
Figure 2c). This phenomenon mainly stems from the saturation characteristics of PVDF piezoelectric sensors. In practice, the linear detection range is the most important evaluation criterion for sensors. This sensor has a linear detection range of 0.01–8.5 N.
3.3. Electrical Signal Response of Al/Ti Alloy Ablated Using Different Laser Parameters
To study the transient force characteristics of using laser ablation on alloy targets, PVDF piezoelectric sensors were used to analyze the interaction between different laser parameters and alloy targets. Under vacuum conditions, a single-nanosecond pulse laser was used to ablate Al alloy substrate targets in a vacuum chamber, and voltage signal changes were used to control the output energy and spot size of a YAG laser. The size of the laser ablation spot on the surface of the Al/Ti alloy plate was adjusted using an optical focusing system. The sensors recorded the voltage signals generated by the ablating Al/Ti alloys, and the peak values of the voltage signals were recorded. The magnitude of the transient force was calculated based on the piezoelectric coefficient of the PVDF sensor. The transient force change process generated by Al/Ti alloy laser ablation was evaluated based on the sensor’s voltage waveform signal.
Figure 4a–e summarize and analyze the voltage signals of the PVDF piezoelectric sensors obtained under different laser energy and laser spot size parameters. The experimental test of the laser ablation of the Al alloy working mediums was repeated three times for each laser energy and corresponding spot parameters. The peak voltage signal values under the same laser ablation conditions were slightly different, which was mainly caused by error sources, such as the target surface, sensor noise, and environmental fluctuations. The voltage peak values under different laser energy and spot size optical parameters are summarized in
Figure 4f. The experimental results show that the peak voltage signal increased from 0.56 V to 2.08 V with the increased laser spot size and energy, with corresponding peak transient force values in a range of 0.8–3 N. It can be inferred that the transient force generated by the laser ablation of an Al alloy working medium also increases with an increase in laser energy and spot size. This is because the high-power-density laser (>10
9 W/cm
2) creates effective body ablation in the Al alloy, which generates significant thrust. There was no significant signal response from the PVDF piezoelectric sensor when the laser energy was further reduced (<90 mJ). This can mainly be attributed to the fact that most of the laser energy was consumed by the reflection from the metal. Therefore, Al alloy laser ablation produces significant thrust when sufficiently high laser power density is required.
To study the transient force generated by the laser ablation of different target materials, we chose Ti alloy for comparative research owing to its high strength, low density, high temperature, corrosion resistance, and other excellent characteristics, as well as its wide applications in spacecraft system components. The electrical signals of the PVDF piezoelectric sensors obtained using Ti alloy laser ablation (using the same parameters as with Al alloys) are shown in
Figure S3a–e. The peak voltage values under various laser ablation conditions are summarized in
Figure S3f. The experimental results show that as the laser energy decreases, the electrical signal intensity of the sensors also weakens, indicating that the stronger the laser energy, the better the thrust effect. Conversely, under the same laser energy conditions, as the laser spot size changes from large to small, the piezoelectric signal intensity first increases and then decreases, mainly due to the different laser power densities caused by the different spot sizes. On one hand, when the laser spot is large, the laser power density is small, making it difficult to effectively ablate the alloy target material; thus, the migration mass caused by the surface ablation of the target material is also small. On the other hand, when the laser spot is small, the high intensity of the Ti alloy results in less migration mass. However, when the laser energy is high enough, the laser power density is higher, and the ablation effect on the Ti alloy target is superior. Therefore, when the laser energy is 800 mJ or 500 mJ, the electrical signal intensity generated by Ti alloy laser ablation increases with a decrease in laser spot size. Thus, an optimal laser ablation condition occurs at a laser spot size of about ~1 mm with a different laser energy value.
To explore the influence of laser ablation with different material targets on the generated transient force, the peak voltage signal intensities obtained by the PVDF piezoelectric sensor during Al/Ti alloy laser ablation under conditions using the same laser energy but different spot sizes and the same laser spot size but different laser energies are summarized in
Figure 5a,b. The experimental results show that the peak piezoelectric signal intensity during Al alloy laser ablation decreases with a decrease in spot size; with Ti alloy, the signal intensity increases with an increase in laser spot size. Thus, the signal intensity of Al alloy laser ablation is obviously stronger than that of the Ti alloy. Notably, under different laser energy conditions, the peak piezoelectric signal intensity of Al and Ti alloy laser ablation decreases with a decrease in laser energy. These experimental rules are mainly due to the different basic characteristics of the different targets. The melting point of 6061 Al alloy is about 700 degrees, and its hardness is about 95–105 HV, while the melting point of Ti alloy is about 1660 degrees, and its hardness can reach 350–380 HV [
26,
27,
28,
29]. Targets with high melting points and strengths require very high laser power density for effective ablation, thereby increasing the migration quality of ablation formation and the piezoelectric signal strength of the transient force [
8,
30,
31]. Therefore, Ti alloys require a higher laser power density. When the laser spot is large, it is not conducive to the formation of high laser power density, causing the piezoelectric signal intensity to increase with a decrease in spot size. However, when the spot size is small, a laser with high enough energy can produce high enough power density to generate large mass migration; thus, the peak piezoelectric signal intensity of Al/Ti alloy laser ablation will decrease with a decrease in laser energy.
During solid-target laser ablation, the mass ablation rate, laser absorption efficiency, and pressure characteristics of the vapor generated are the main factors affecting the magnitude of the transient force. Under high laser energy density, the plasma generated will affect laser absorption, and there will be no significant difference in laser absorption efficiency and vapor pressure. The ablation volume is estimated based on the volume of the laser ablation pit, and the migration mass of the laser-ablated alloy target is obtained. When the laser energy is 800 mJ, the ablation masses of Al alloy under different spot sizes are 392.46 μg, 315.33 μg, 220.19 μg, 180.5 μg, and 164.58 μg. The ablation masses of Ti alloy under different spot sizes are 209.37 μg, 174.19 μg, 127.45 μg, 119.86 μg, and 104.29 μg. The migration mass of Al alloy ablation is 1.5 to 1.9 times that of Ti alloy. The results show that the migration mass of the laser-ablated target is the most critical factor affecting the magnitude of the transient force. Therefore, under the same laser parameters in this experiment, the transient force generated by the Al alloy was significantly greater than that of the Ti alloy.
Figure 5c shows a repeatability test diagram of the voltage signal output by a piezoelectric sensor under the same laser spot size and energy values. The voltage signal curve of the sensor was obtained when the same laser parameters (350 mJ; 0.76 mm) were used to ablate the Al alloy. The figure shows that after nine measurements, the voltage signal of the sensor had good repeatability under the same conditions; the maximum peak value of the voltage was about 1.23 V, and the minimum peak value was 1.21 V. The deviation of the measured voltage was less than 1.7%.
Figure 5d compares the voltage signal output by the piezoelectric sensor under vacuum and air conditions with the same laser parameters (350 mJ; 0.76 mm) to ablate the Al alloy. Compared with the air conditions, the peak voltage signal generated through laser ablation of an Al alloy working medium is much larger than under vacuum conditions, mainly because a certain amount of mass migration and a shockwave occur when the Al alloy target is irradiated with high laser power density. These factors generate significant momentum. Therefore, the jet resistance generated by the laser ablation of an alloy working medium under air conditions is relatively large, and the PVDF piezoelectric sensor is subjected to a greater reaction force.
The long-term durability and stability of a PVDF sensor under repeated laser-induced shock loading are shown in
Figure 6a,b, where the same laser parameters are used to ablate the Ti alloy. The piezoelectric signal changes in a single laser pulse ablating the Ti alloy target are shown in
Figure 6a, which first presents a vibration signal caused by a photo-explosive explosion on the surface of the laser-ablated target. Subsequently, the products of the laser ablation target expand outward to perform their work and produce an obvious signal of transient force change with time. The piezoelectric signal values after 65,000 cycles are shown in
Figure 6b. The results show that there is no obvious change in the signal after many cycles. The peak voltage signal changes within 0.6%, and the transient force sensor presents good long-term durability and stability.
Figure 6c,d show the time stability of an FVDF piezoelectric sensor and the effect of temperature on it, respectively. The experimental data show that 10, 20, 40, and 80 days after testing the same piezoelectric signal parameters, the response value of the variance is only 2.6%, indicating that the sensor under these working conditions has good time stability. The experimental results in
Figure 6d show that the signal of the piezoelectric sensor decreases by only 3.5% with an increase in temperature in the air environment, and the piezoelectric signal decreases only 5.1% under vacuum conditions. These experimental results indicate that the piezoelectric sensor is insensitive to temperature change and has excellent temperature stability.
3.4. Transient Force Generation Mechanism of Al/Ti Alloy Laser Ablation
To further analyze the influencing factors and mechanisms of Al/Ti alloy laser ablation used to produce transient force, the physical process of the target was simulated with the same parameters as the experiment. As shown in
Figure S4, the single pulse laser waveform incident on the surface of the target is a nanosecond Gaussian beam.
Figure 7a shows the relationship between the temperature of the laser ablation Al alloy target and the position of the spot center with time. The temperature increases significantly with the time of laser loading and then decreases slowly. The spot center position begins to decline rapidly and then stabilizes as the laser ablation threshold is reached. The whole process tends to stabilize in about 120 ns, and then the temperature of the laser ablative target spreads to the inside of the plate. When the melting point temperature of the Al alloy is reached, effective ablation will form. Over time, more of the material melts, causing the depth of the laser ablation pit to increase.
Figure 7b shows a 2D microscopic image with a laser energy of 800 mJ and a spot size of 0.76 mm during the experiment. There are obvious hemispherical pits in the image, and the experimental results are similar to the simulation results.
Figure 7c–f show the surface temperature of the laser ablation target and the evolution process of the ablation pit in the
X-
Z plane; that is, the evolution process of melting and vaporization.
Figure 7c–f show that as the ablation time of the laser changes, the temperature gradually decreases in the direction away from the center, and the center temperature of the laser beam is the highest. There is a small drop in the center position due to the temperature exceeding the melting point of the material, leading to the significant mass migration of the target block. The temperature field distribution shows that laser melting starts as the material melts, indicating that the amount of gasification increases with time, and the amount of melting gradually increases.
These experimental and simulation results show that the laser ablation of Al alloy targets is mainly based on the photothermal effect. Various changes will occur on the surface area of the material under different power densities when the laser is irradiated on the surface of the material. These changes include the following [
31,
32,
33]. Melting: when a target material absorbs laser energy, its temperature rises to its melting point, causing the material to change from a solid to a liquid state. Evaporation and sublimation: if the intensity of the laser is high enough, the temperature of the material can quickly rise above the boiling point, and the material will directly change from a solid or liquid to a gas. Vaporized matter gathers near the surface of the material and ionizes to form a plasma, helping the material absorb the laser. Under the pressure of vaporization expansion, the liquid surface deforms, and pits form. When plasma with a higher degree of ionization forms, this dense plasma has a shielding effect on the laser, greatly reducing the energy density of the laser incident into the material. Solidification: after laser heating, the material’s transformation from a liquid to a solid is called solidification. After solidification, a fixed ablative morphology will be left on the target. In addition, the absorption of the laser by the target should also be considered during ablation, that is, the laser’s energy utilization rate. During laser ablation, the absorption rate of the material surface varies with the laser power density and the material surface temperature. When the material is not dissolved, the absorption rate of the laser material increases slowly with an increase in its surface temperature. When the power density is large (10
7 W/cm
2), the material is violently vaporized, forming a keyhole. The laser enters the keyhole for multiple reflections and absorption, dramatically increasing the absorption rate of the laser material, and the ablation depth will increase significantly [
33,
34].
To further demonstrate the differences in the transient force generated by single-pulse Al/Ti alloy laser ablation, the simulation results for Ti alloy laser ablation are shown in
Figure S5. The temperature curve obtained from the simulation indicates that during the laser loading process, the temperature of the Ti alloy rapidly rises to approximately 2000 degrees, and then there is no significant decrease. The temperature at the ablation center of the Ti alloy target begins to drop at around 1600 degrees, indicating that the temperature has reached the melting point of the Ti alloy at this point, which enters a molten state under the action of the laser. However, the high melting point of the Ti alloy suggests that a higher laser power density is required for effective laser ablation; temperature propagation within the target is mainly related to the thermal conductivity of its material and its absorption of laser energy. The displacement change curve of the center position is similar to that of the Al alloy, but the depth of the pit at the center point is lower, indicating that under these conditions, the laser ablation power density can meet the effective ablation of both target materials, thereby generating effective pulsed force. To explore the absorption characteristics of the target materials under the laser, the reflection mode of a near-infrared spectrometer was used to test the light reflection characteristics of the two target materials in a range of 900–1700 nm (
Figure S6). At a light wavelength of 1064 nm, the reflectance values of the Al/Ti alloy target materials are 45% and 4%, lower than those of high-purity alloys. This can be mainly attributed to the basic physical properties, laser energy, ultra-thin oxide layer, and roughness of the surface [
35,
36]. Notably, the reflectance of the Al alloy is significantly higher than that of Ti alloy; furthermore, the transient force generated during Al alloy laser ablation is also significantly higher than that of the Ti alloy. This is mainly due to the relatively high-power density of the laser ablation needed for alloy targets. At this time, the light reflection characteristics of the target material have little impact on the laser ablation effects. However, when the laser power density is low, the light reflection characteristics will greatly affect the energy utilization rate of the laser, resulting in significant differences in the laser ablation effect and significant changes in the transient force generated.
This laser ablation process demonstrates that the generation of transient force is mainly related to the formation of target physical properties, target migration mass, the environmental medium, and the laser energy utilization rate. In research on laser ablation propulsion technology, on one hand, high-efficiency light-to-force conversion is required. On the other hand, the sustainable ablation state and mass utilization rate of the target material must be considered. When the mass transfer rate of the laser ablation target material is large, the resulting transient force is also significant. However, a high mass transfer rate can decrease the laser-ablation-specific impulse. Laser propulsion performance can be measured in terms of physical parameters, such as the specific impulse, the impulse coupling coefficient, and the energy conversion factor. The specific impulse (
Isp) is calculated according to the following formula:
where
Ft denotes the transient force and m denotes the migrating mass of the target material.
The impulse coupling coefficient (
Cm) is calculated by combining the single impulse and the laser output energy (
E); the mathematical expression is as follows:
The energy conversion efficiency (
η) can be calculated using the specific impulse and the impulse coupling coefficient; the mathematical expression is as follows:
Formulas (7)–(9) show that using transient force measurements with a PVDF sensor is better for analyzing the physical processes generated by laser ablation. Nevertheless, too much laser energy and migrating mass in the target material can limit laser propulsion performance. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively consider both laser parameters and the physical properties of the target material to effectively enhance the performance of laser propulsion.
The experimental results for the transient force generated by Al and Ti alloy laser ablation measured with FVDF sensors demonstrate that optimizing laser parameters and target material properties can effectively improve the performance of laser propulsion. The following factors can increase the key technical parameter of specific impulse in laser propulsion. (1) Under limited conditions, we must try to increase the energy of incident lasers as much as possible. This improves laser ablation efficiency, generates high-temperature expanding gas to perform work externally, and thus produces a larger impulse. (2) We should select materials with better absorption at the laser’s corresponding wavelength. Increasing the absorption rate of laser energy means better laser energy deposition efficiency, thereby increasing the conversion efficiency of light to force and impulse generation. (3) We should select materials with a lower laser ablation energy threshold. This increases the ionization degree of the ablated target material under limited laser energy conditions, thereby generating more effective ablation effects. (4) We should select materials with more binding energy. This helps to avoid excessive migration mass during laser ablation. During laser ablation, photothermal explosions will carry many particles around the ablation area, thereby increasing unnecessary migration mass, which will reduce the specific impulse and be unfavorable for regulating and controlling thrust. (5) Considering the relationship between the laser and the ablation material comprehensively, and adjusting the appropriate laser energy and spot size to ablate the material according to its basic characteristics, can increase the specific impulse.