Next Article in Journal
Composite ADRC Speed Control Method Based on LTDRO Feedforward Compensation
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Coherent Integration Algorithm for High-Speed Target Detection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 24
Issue 8
10.3390/s24082604
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposites for Enhanced Acetone Gas Sensors

by
Zhihua Zhao
1,*,
Zhenli Lv
1,
Zhuo Chen
1,
Baocang Zhou
1 and
Zhigang Shao
2,*
1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450052, China
2
Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, CNRS UPR 8241, University of Toulouse, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31077 Toulouse, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(8), 2604; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082604
Submission received: 19 March 2024 / Revised: 6 April 2024 / Accepted: 11 April 2024 / Published: 18 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal oxide semi-conductors are widely applied in various fields due to their low cost, easy processing, and good compatibility with microelectronic technology. In this study, ternary α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites were prepared via simple hydrothermal and annealing treatments. The composition, morphology, and crystal structure of the samples were studied using XPS, SEM, EDS, XRD, and multiple other testing methods. The gas-sensing measurement results suggest that the response value (34.66) of the F/M-3 sensor is 3.5 times higher than the pure α-Fe2O3 sensor (9.78) around 100 ppm acetone at 220°C, with a rapid response and recovery time (10/7 s). Furthermore, the sensors have an ultra-low detection limit (0.1 ppm acetone), excellent selectivity, and long-term stability. The improved sensitivity of the composites is mainly attributed to their excellent metal conductivity, the unique two-dimensional layered structure of Ti3C2Tx, and the heterojunction formed between the nanocomposite materials. This research paves a new route for the preparation of MXene derivatives and metal oxide nanocomposites.

1. Introduction

Acetone is a common chemical compound in the medical industry. However, if its concentration reaches a certain value, it can cause several negative effects on humans, such as respiratory stimulation, vomiting, and spasms [1,2]. Acetone can also be used as a biomarker for diagnosing diabetes [3]. The principle is that the acetone concentration in the exhaled breath of healthy individuals is lower than that of those with diabetes [4]. People with diabetes exhale about 1.8–10 ppm of acetone gas, whereas people without diabetes exhale less than 0.8 ppm [5]. Therefore, the selective and fast detection of acetone below the critical ppm level is crucial for its industrial safety and the early diagnosis of diabetes. Gas-sensing technologies are an effective way to implement real-time gas detection; thus, this technology is often used to monitor air quality, food freshness, and human health [6]. In order to meet practical application requirements, gas sensors must have an excellent sensing performance, such as selectivity, sensitivity, and rapid response, which are closely related to sensing materials. Among them, semi-conductors are the most common due to their low cost, high processability, and good compatibility with microelectronic technology [7,8]. Therefore, many metal oxide semi-conductors have been used as gas-sensing materials for acetone vapor detection [9,10,11,12].
According to previous works, α-Fe2O3 has an ideal gas sensitivity level for methyl-containing gas, especially acetone [13,14]. However, pure α-Fe2O3 gas sensors generally have low responses and relatively high detection limits for acetone, which limits its application in human health diagnoses. To overcome these limitations, heterojunction, composite materials, and elemental doping, etc., have been attempted. For example, Lu et al. successfully prepared a W18O49/α-Fe2O3 hollow heterojunction structure where the acetone detection limit of the material reached 86 ppb at 260 °C, which is much lower than the detection limit of pure α-Fe2O3 [15]. Wang et al. reported that the microstructure of α-Fe2O3 was changed by Ce doping and generated surface defects created more active sites for gas adsorption. Therefore, the 100 ppm acetone response can reach 26.3 at 220 °C [16]. Liu et al. mentioned that the response of α-Fe2O3 with a porous structure of up to 100 ppm acetone at 210 °C can reach 14.5, indicating that the porous structure of α-Fe2O3 has a low detection limit and a short response time [17]. Guo et al. reported that the response of rGO/α-Fe2O3 nanofibers to 100 ppm acetone can reach 100, which is about 4.5 times that of the response of a α-Fe2O3 nanobelt at 375 °C [18]. Although α-Fe2O3 gas sensitivity has been improved via these methods, further study is required to obtain an acetone sensor with both low detection limits and a rapid response.
MXene is a novel two-dimensional material that has gained significant attention for its widespread applications in the fields of photo/electro catalysts, supercapacitors, electronic ink, electromagnetic wave shielding, and gas sensors [19,20,21]. For example, monolayer Ti2CO2 MXene has shown an outstanding NH3 sensing ability due to its unique transport properties. In addition, its conduction characteristics can dramatically change before and after NH3 adsorption [22]. Ti3C2Tx MXene films, developed on polyimide substrates via a simple drop-casting method, detected various VOCs, such as CH3OH, C2H5OH, and NH3 at room temperature [23,24]. In another work by Lu et al., a simple alkaline treatment improved the gas response of Ti3C2Tx MXene, possibly due to the intercalation of an alkali metal (Na+) ion [25]. Moreover, Ti3C2Tx MXene has a large surface area and rich surface groups, making it a good substrate when compounded with other materials. For example, different composites of Ti3C2Tx MXene, such as PANI/Ti3C2Tx [26], Pd@MXene [27], W18O49/Ti3C2Tx [28], In2O3 nanofibers/Ti3C2Tx MXene [29], α-Fe2O3/Ti3C2Tx [30], and CuO/Ti3C2Tx [31], have been prepared for advanced gas sensors. However, no reports have been published on the ternary α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites for gas sensor applications.
In this ongoing study, ternary α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites were prepared using simple hydrothermal and annealing treatments. In addition, the materials were tested for their gas sensitivity, selectivity, moisture resistance, and stability. The results show that the sensors’ optimal response to 100 ppm acetone was 34.66. The sensors also showed great selectivity and a lower detection limit (0.1 ppm acetone), which is important for theoretical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

Ferr (III) chloride hexahydrate, ammonia, and hydrofluoric acid (HF) were purchased from Aladdin. Acetone, ethanol, methanol, formaldehyde, and toluene were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The above reagents were of an analytical grade and did not require further purification. Ti3AlC2 (98%) powder was obtained from Jilin 11 Technology Co., Ltd., Jilin, China.

2.1. Synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene

The Ti3C2Tx sample was prepared using the methods mentioned in our previous work [32]. First, 1g of Ti3C2Tx was added to 20 mL of 45 wt % HF. Then, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The solution was washed with deionized water until the pH value was about 6~7. Finally, the collected precipitate was dried at 80°C for 12 h in a vacuum to obtain Ti3C2Tx powder.

2.2. Synthesis of α-Fe2O3

The α-Fe2O3 was synthesized via simple hydrothermal and annealing treatment. Under normal circumstances, 677 mg of FeCl3·6H2O (AR, Aladdin Reagent, Shanghai, China) was added to 20 mL of deionized water. After it was dissolved, 2 mL of NH3·H2O (AR, Aladdin Reagent, Shanghai, China) was added dropwise into the aforementioned solution, followed by stirring with a magnetic force for 1 h. As a result, the emulsion was transferred into a PTFE autoclave, and then was heated at 150 °C for 12 h. The precipitate was collected by washing repeatedly with deionized water and absolute ethanol, and then was dried in a vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h. Finally, the precipitate powder was annealed at a rate of 10 °C/min for 30 min 350 °C to obtain α-Fe2O3 powder.

2.3. Synthesis of α-Fe2O3/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposites

The synthesis process used for α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites was similar to that of pure α-Fe2O3. The procedure was as follows. First, 20 mL of deionized water was added to 677 mg of FeCl3·6H2O to obtain an orange solution. Then, 6.19 mg of Ti3C2Tx powder was slowly added to the aforementioned solution and the solution was stirred until it was uniformly dispersed. Then, 2 mL of NH3·H2O was added dropwise to the solution and stirred magnetically at room temperature for 1 h. The solution was then transferred to a PTFE pressure cooker and heated at 150 °C for 12 h. The sediment was collected after repeated washing with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol, and then the collected precipitate was kept in a vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h. Finally, the powder was calcinated at 350 °C with a temperature increase of 10 °C/min for 30 min to obtain the ternary α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites. The weight proportions of 2.02, 4.082, 6.19, and 8.33 mg of Ti3C2Tx within the nanocomposites were theoretically calculated to be 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%, and thus, the nanocomposites with four different proportions were prepared using the same procedure. For convenience, the final products were marked as F/M-1, F/M-2, F/M-3, and F/M-4, respectively.

2.4. Structures and Morphology Characterizations

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the obtained samples were obtained via an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’ PertPro MPD, PANalytical BV, Holland) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5442 Å). The crystal property data were confirmed using the selected 2θ range of 5–90°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Gemini SEM 300, ZEISS, Germany) characterization was conducted to observe the morphology of the materials. The elemental mappings were acquired using energy disperse X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford Instrument, England). The surface composition and electronic state of the samples were analyzed using X-ray photoelectric spectroscopy (XPS, PHI-5300, Perkin Elmer, USA) with a monochromatic Al Kα source (1486.6 eV).

2.5. Evaluation of Gas-Sensing Performance

The method used for preparing the sensors and evaluating their performance was similar to the method mentioned in our previous work [32]. First, an appropriate amount of the nanocomposites was added to a suitable amount of anhydrous ethanol, and the mixture was sonicated for 2–5 min until the nanocomposites were completely dissolved. It was confirmed that the electrode on the ceramic tube was completely coated in the material and the thickness of the paint was uniform. The coated ceramic tube was vacuum-dried at 80 °C for 6 h. Then, the dried ceramic tube was welded to the base. Subsequently, to control the temperature of the sensitive layer, a heated Ni-Cr alloy coil was passed through the ceramic tube and welded to the base. The gas sensitivities were tested using the WS-30B gas sensitive element test system (Zhengzhou Wisen Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China); the exact procedure is shown in Figure 1. The operating temperature of the gas sensor was adjusted by changing the heating voltage. All the tested gases were liquid at room temperature, the liquids were transferred onto a heating plate installed in the testing chamber, and evaporation was used to obtain the corresponding testing gases. The relative humidity of the testing chamber could be adjusted roughly by adding deionized water to the evaporator to obtain water vapor. Here, all the target gases were reducing gases, and the resistance of the sensor decreased when exposed to a tested gas. Thus, the gas-sensing response was defined as Ra/Rg, where Ra and Rg represent the resistance of the gas sensor in the air and target gas, respectively. The response and recovery time was defined as the time taken to reach a 90% change in the resistance during the gas adsorption and desorption processes, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Structures and Morphology of Samples

The phase and crystal structures of the samples were investigated via a series of X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. Figure 2a shows the XRD spectra of the Ti3AlC2 MAX precursor and the obtained Ti3C2Tx MXene. Slight shifts in the (002) and (004) peaks of the Ti3C2Tx toward the lower angles are evident, while the most intense diffraction peak at 39° disappeared completely compared to the Ti3AlC2 MAX precursor, which indicates the successful conversion of Ti3AlC2 into Ti3C2Tx [33]. Figure 2b shows the XRD patterns of the α-Fe2O3 and F/M composites samples. The diffraction peak of the obtained pure α-Fe2O3 matches well with the standard card (JCPDS No. 33-0664), which reveals that the α-Fe2O3 was synthesized successfully. However, there were no significant Ti3C2Tx diffraction peaks for the F/M-1, F/M-2, F/M-3, and F/M-4 samples, which may have been due to the relatively low content of Ti3C2Tx and the α-Fe2O3 coverage produced in the annealing process [28].
The morphologies and microstructures of the Ti3C2Tx and F/M-3 nanocomposites were studied using SEM. As shown in Figure 3a, the obtained Ti3C2Tx shows an accordion-like structure. The SEM images with different resolutions (Figure 3b,c) of F/M-3 indicate that the layered structure of Ti3C2Tx was well-preserved and can be used as a substrate to support α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The EDS element mapping results are shown in Figure 3d, confirming the uniform distribution of the α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles on the layered MXene. This structure endowed the sample with a large specific surface area. Ti3C2Tx can also be used as a carrier for charge transfer, so the gas-sensing performance was improved. Figure 4 shows the XPS analysis results of the F/M-3sample. As shown in Figure 4a, peaks conforming to Ti, C, O, F, and Fe were broadly observed, which are in agreement with the EDS results. It can be seen that the intensities of the Ti and C energy spectra are much lower than that of the Fe energy spectrum, indicating the low content of Ti3C2Tx. Figure 4b shows the energy spectrum of Fe. It can be seen that the combined binding energy at 712.2 and 724.1 eV, respectively, represent the peak values of Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, indicating that Fe may exist as a form of α-Fe2O3 in the F/M nanocomposites [34]. In Figure 4c, the C 1s XPS clearly shows that the peak of the Ti-C bond of Ti3C2Tx at 281.7 eV vanished entirely in F/M-3. Additionally, the Ti 2p XPS (Figure 4d) of F/M-3 shows that the peak values of Ti2+ and Ti3+ (453~457 eV) decreased, while the peaks of Ti4+ (~458 eV) obviously increased compared to Ti3C2Tx, indicating that the sectional Ti3C2Tx was oxidized into TiO2 [35]. The above characteristic analysis confirms that the synthetic samples consisted of α-Fe2O3, TiO2, and Ti3C2Tx.

3.2. Gas-Sensing Performance

In Figure 5a, the gas-sensing responses of the different gas sensors to 100 ppm acetone under operating temperatures between 180 °C and 260 °C can be seen. Regardless of the working temperature, all F/M nanocomposite-based sensors showed substantially greater response values than the pure α-Fe2O3 sensors, and the sensor with the F/M-3 ratio had the highest response among all sensors. Additionally, it was found that the maximum response value of all gas sensors occurred at 220 °C. Figure 5b exhibited the dynamic response and recovery curves of sensors exposed to acetone ranging from 5 to 100 ppm at the optimal working temperature of 220 °C. Clearly, the response significantly increased with the increasing acetone concentration. Additionally, the strong ability of the response curve to return to its original position after acetone removal indicates a high degree of reversibility. Meanwhile, it can be seen in Table 1 that the response recovery times of F/M-3 to acetone at different concentrations were basically the same, which proves the response stability of the sensor. Further research was carried out on the sensors’ acetone gas detection capabilities. Figure 5c describes the reproducibly dynamic response and recovery curves of the pure α-Fe2O3 and F/M-3 sensors to ultra-low acetone concentrations of 0.1~3 ppm at 220 °C. The F/M-3 sensor showed a highly superior response compared to the pure α-Fe2O3 sensor when exposed to 0.5 ppm of acetone or more. Although the response of the F/M-3 sensor showed a drift from the baseline, the difference in the response value was negligible. This was likely due to the water vapor from the acetone gas. Because the low concentrations were outside of the minimum range of the micro-syringe that was used to transfer the liquid acetone to the evaporator, the original liquid acetone had to be properly diluted. When the water vapor came into contact with the alkalized Ti3C2Tx within the F/M-3 composite, the resistance of the alkalized Ti3C2Tx decreased [25], which decreased the resistance of the composite, leading to an increase in the Ra/Rg. This ultra-low detection limit makes the F/M-3 sensor suitable for applications such as diabetes diagnostics. As illustrated in Figure 5d, 100 ppm acetone, ethanol, methanol, formaldehyde, and toluene were used to study the selectivity of F/M-3. The response of acetone at different concentrations was significantly greater than that of the other four gases, indicating that acetone has good selectivity. The selectivity of acetone could be attributed to the different bond energies within the target gases. The bond disaggregation energy of acetone (366 kJ mol−l) is lower than that of gases such as formaldehyde (368 kJ mol−1), ethanol (462 kJ mol−1), and so on, so it reacts more easily with the adsorbed oxygen species. Moreover, the rich surface functional groups of MXene material and iron oxide may have a synergistic effect, which makes it easier for them to form strong hydrogen bonds with acetone molecules [30]. It should be noted that all the gas-sensing measurements above were conducted in an ambient environment with 10% relative humidity. Subsequently, the response change of the F/M-3 sensor under different relative humidities (RH = 10~50%) was further investigated. As shown in Figure 5e, the response of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm acetone also steadily decreased as the RH increased, and the lowest value occurred when the RH was 50%. We believe that the F/M-3 test response decreased with increasing humidity at the optimal temperature, which can be explained by the fact that H2O molecules can compete with O2 molecules to capture electrons from the F/M-3 composite, which is not conducive to the reaction between the ionic oxygen species (O2−, O−, and O2−) adsorbed on the surface of the composite and the target gas. Therefore, the variation in resistance of the F/M-3 sensor decreased with increasing RH. Figure 5f shows the response and recovery times of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm acetone at 220 °C, which were 10 s and 7 s, respectively. Additionally, the repeatability and long-term stability of the F/M-3 sensor to acetone was also investigated and are shown in Figure 6. The sensitivity value changed very little over five consecutive cycles, which demonstrates great repeatability (Figure 6a), and the response value of the sensor made out of ternary nanocomposites was quite stable. As shown in Figure 6b, over 47 days, the response to 100 ppm acetone is negligible. As illustrated in Table 2, compared to previous work on acetone sensors, the F/M composite sensor has a promising application for detecting acetone.

4. Discussion

The gas-sensitive mechanism of semiconductors was studied though the change of the resistance before and after adsorbing the target gas [41]. It is universally known that α-Fe2O3 is a typical n-type semiconductor, and thus, the exposed surface of the material can adsorb oxygen molecules in the air. Simultaneously, the electrons transmitted to the band can be extracted from oxygen atoms with strong electronegativity to form O2−, O−, and O2− on the basis of the temperature, causing the formation of electron depletion layers and an increase in resistance. In addition, the operating temperature affects the type of adsorbed oxygen formation, and thus, a reaction of the adsorbed oxygen with the target gas. In general, O2− is the main oxygen species when the temperature is below 150 °C. The O2− species disappears rapidly when the temperature increases to between 150 and 400 °C, and O− becomes the dominant oxygen species. When the operating temperature increases further than above 400 °C, O2− is formed [42]. When the sensor is exposed to acetone gas, the acetone molecules will react with the oxygen to produce H2O and CO2, according to Equations (1)–(4). The released electrons returned back to conductive band, which reduces the depletion layers and increases the charge carrier density, leading to the decreased resistance of α-Fe2O3-based gas sensors.
O2(gas) → O2 (ads)
O2(ads) + e− → O2−(ads) (T < 150 °C)
O2−(ads) + e− → 2O−(ads) (150 °C < T < 400 °C)
CO(CH3)2(ads)+ 8O−(ads)→ 3CO2(gas) + 3H2O (gas)+ 8e−
The effect of Ti3C2Tx MXene on improving acetone gas-sensing performance is explained below. Based on the layered structure of Ti3C2Tx MXene, F/M nanocomposites may have larger specific surface areas, which can offer rich active sites for the adsorption of oxygen and acetone gas. Thus, the acetone gas sensitivity performance of the F/M nanocomposites was improved. But when the content of Ti3C2Tx in the nanocomposite was greater than that of the F/M-3 sample, the sensing performance decreased, which may have been due to the accumulation of materials caused by the excess Ti3C2Tx, which, thus, reduced the specific surface area, resulting in a decrease in the active site.
The improved sensing performance was also due to the possible formation of ohmic contacts and n-n heterojunctions between Ti3C2Tx and its derivatives, TiO2 and α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. It has been proven that the heterostructure can inhibit the recombination of carriers and increase the concentration of carriers, and thus, the gas-sensing performance of semiconductors has been greatly improved. The adsorption and desorption process of the gas is illustrated in Figure 7a. Compared to the α-Fe2O3 sensor, the F/M nanocomposite sensors exhibited a significantly superior response to acetone, which could probably be attributed to the construction of the α-Fe2O3/TiO2 n-n junction combined with metallic Ti3C2Tx. As shown in Figure 7b, α-Fe2O3, TiO2, and Ti3C2Tx had different band structures before coming into contact with any species [34,43]. A carrier transfer process occurred after contact until the system reached equilibrium and a new Fermi level was obtained, resulting in the bands bending. Within the F/M nanocomposites, metallic Ti3C2Tx and α-Fe2O3 had a lower and higher work function, respectively, compared to TiO2. The results show that the electrons migrated from Ti3C2Tx and α-Fe2O3 to TiO2 and vice versa. This led to a loss layer at the n-n junction interface and the formation of TiO2@Ti3C2Tx formation of electron accumulation layers (EALs) on the interface, as shown in Figure 7c. In air, the O2 molecules absorbed on the surface caught electrons to form O2−, O−, and O2− species. The results were a thinner EAL and thicker layers which were depleted, which decreased the charge carrier density and compressed the charge carrier mobility. Therefore, the resistance of the materials increased, as shown in Figure 7d. When exposed to acetone (Figure 7e), the electrons generated by the reaction between the acetone and oxygen species were released into the nanocomposites. In this case, the EALs and depleted layers were recovered at the original location, leading to the decrease in the resistance of the F/M sensors. Due to the existence of the ohmic contact and n-n heterojunction, the F/M sensors exhibited a greater transformation in resistance than the pure α-Fe2O3 sensor under the acetone atmosphere.

5. Conclusions

In summary, α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx ternary nanocomposites were successfully prepared using simple hydrothermal and annealing treatments. The gas sensitivity of the materials was evaluated carefully, and the results show that the gas sensitivity of the F/M composites was greater than that of pure α-Fe2O3. Additionally, gas sensors with an F/M-3 doping ratio exhibited the best performance, with a response value of up to 34.66 for 100 ppm of acetone at 220 °C, which is an increase of approximately 3.5-fold compared to pure α-Fe2O3. The sensor had a fast response and recovery (10 and 7 s, respectively, to 100 ppm of acetone), commendable selectivity, and a low detection limit for 0.1 ppm. The main reason for its improved sensitivity is the unique topography of F/M nanocomposites and the formation of heterojunctions between different components. In addition, the F/M-3 sensor has good moisture resistance and long-term stability, which has broad prospects in many practical applications, for instance, diabetes detection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Z.L.; methodology, Z.C.; software, Z.C.; validation, Z.S.; formal analysis, Z.L.; investigation, Z.Z.; resources, Z.C.; data curation, Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z.; visualization, Z.C.; supervision, B.Z.; project administration, Z.S.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Henan Province (No. 221111220300), the Youth Backbone Teacher Training Program of Henan University of Technology (No. 21420154), the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (62333013), and the Natural Science Project of Zhengzhou Science and Technology Bureau (21ZZXTCX12).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to this research project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lupan, O.; Postica, V.; Wolff, N.; Polonskyi, O.; Duppel, V.; Kaidas, V.; Lazari, E.; Ababii, A.; Faupel, F.; Kienle, L.; et al. Localized synthesis of iron oxide nanowires and fabrication of high performance nanosensors based on a single Fe2O3 nanowire. Small 2017, 13, 1602868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.F.; Ma, W.; Jiang, F.; Cao, E.S.; Sun, K.M.; Cheng, L.; Song, X.Z. Prussian Blue analogue derived porous NiFe2O4 nanocubes for low-concentration acetone sensing at low working temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Makisimovich, N.; Vorotyntsev, V.; Nikitina, N.; Kaskevich, O.; Karabun, P.; Martynenko, F. Adsorption semiconductor sensor for diabetic ketoacidosis diagnosis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996, 36, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Park, S. Acetone gas detection using TiO2 nanoparticles functionalized In2O3 nanowires for diagnosis of diabetes. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 696, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Galassetti, P.R.; Novak, B.; Nemet, D.; Rose-Gottron, C.; Cooper, D.M.; Meinardi, S.; Newcomb, R.; Zaldivar, F.; Blake, D.R. Breath ethanol and acetone as indicators of serum glucose levels: An initial report. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2005, 7, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yamazoe, N. Toward innovations of gas sensor technology. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 108, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, C.; Yin, P.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, X.; OuYang, C.; Xie, Y. Synthesis of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanorods: Diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 17806–17812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, B.; Fu, W.; Meng, X.; Meng, X.; Ruan, A.; Su, P.; Yang, H. Enhanced ethanol sensing properties based on spherical-coral-like SnO2 nanorods decorated with α-Fe2O3 nanocrystallites. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 261, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T. Facile construction of Co3O4 porous microspheres with enhanced acetone gas sensing performances. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 101, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kou, X.; Xie, N.; Chen, F.; Wang, T.; Guo, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, Q.; Ma, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Superior acetone gas sensor based on electrospun SnO2 nanofibers by Rh doping. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, Y.G.; Park, J.Y.; Suh, J.M.; Shim, Y.S.; Yi, S.Y.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.; Yuk, J.M.; Ju, B.K.; Kang, C.Y. Heterojunction based on Rh-decorated WO3 nanorods for morphological change and gas sensor application using the transition effect. Chem. Mater. 2018, 31, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, M.; Zhang, S.; Qu, F.; Gong, S.; Wang, C.; Qiu, L.; Yang, M.; Cheng, W. High performance acetone sensor based on ZnO nanorods modified by Au nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 797, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, D.H.; Shim, Y.S.; Jeon, J.M.; Jeong, H.Y.; Park, S.S.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, H.W. Vertically ordered hematite nanotube array as an ultrasensitive and rapid response acetone sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14779–14784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Picasso, G.; Quintilla, A.; Pina, M.P.; Herguido, J. Total combustion of methyl-ethyl ketone over Fe2O3 based catalytic membrane reactors. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 46, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Y.; Ma, T.; Zheng, L.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Heterostructures of hematite-sensitized W18O49 hollow spheres for improved acetone detection with ultralow detection limit. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 288, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.; Wang, T.; Si, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Deng, X.; Xu, X. Oxygen vacancy defects engineering on Ce-doped α-Fe2O3 gas sensor for reducing gases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 302, 127165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Li, W.; Wang, Q.; Sun, P.; Chuai, X.; Lu, G. Porous α-Fe2O3 microflowers: Synthesis, structure, and enhanced acetone sensing performances. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, L.; Kou, X.; Ding, M.; Wang, C.; Dong, L.; Zhang, H.; Feng, C.; Sun, Y.; Gao, Y.; Sun, P.; et al. Reduced graphene oxide/α-Fe2O3 composite nanofibers for application in gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, L.; Wang, K.; Wei, W.; Wang, L.; Han, W. High-performance flexible sensing devices based on polyaniline/MXene nanocomposites. InfoMat 2019, 1, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, E.; VahidMohammadi, A.; Yoon, Y.S.; Beidaghi, M.; Kim, D.J. Two-dimensional vanadium carbide MXene for gas sensors with ultrahigh sensitivity toward nonpolar gases. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Song, P.; Sun, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Q. MoO3/Ti3C2Tx MXene nanocomposites with rapid response for enhanced ethanol-sensing at a low temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 378, 133216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Cheng, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; Yang, X.; Xiao, B. Monolayer Ti2CO2: A promising candidate for NH3 sensor or capturer with high sensitivity and selectivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13707–13713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, E.; VahidMohammadi, A.; Prorok, B.C.; Yoon, Y.S.; Beidaghi, M.; Kim, D.J. Room temperature gas sensing of two-dimensional titanium carbide (MXene). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 37184–37190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Song, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q. Sensing performance of α-Fe2O3/Ti3C2Tx MXene nanocomposites to NH3 at room temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 898, 162812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Z.; Liu, A.; Wang, C.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; You, R.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; et al. Improvement of gas and humidity sensing properties of organ-like MXene by alkaline treatment. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, X.; Xu, J.L.; Jiang, Y.D.; He, Z.Z.; Liu, B.H.; Xie, H.K.; Li, H.; Li, Z.M.; Wang, Y.; Tai, H.L. Toward agricultural ammonia volatilization monitoring: A flexible polyaniline/Ti3C2Tx hybrid sensitive films based gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2020, 316, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, Z.; Liu, C.; Jiang, F.; Liu, J.; Ma, X.; Liu, P.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Huang, R. Flexible and lightweight Ti3C2Tx MXene@Pd colloidal nanoclusters paper film as novel H2 sensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 123054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sun, S.; Wang, M.; Chang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y. W18O49/Ti3C2Tx Mxene nanocomposites for highly sensitive acetone gas sensor with low detection limit. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, Q.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Q.; Song, P. Fabrication of 1D/2D In2O3 nanofibers/Ti3C2TX MXene composites for high performance detection of trimethylamine at low temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 405, 135338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Song, P.; Liu, M.; Wang, Q. α-Fe2O3 nanocubes/Ti3C2Tx MXene composites for improvement of acetone sensing performance at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hermawan, A.; Zhang, B.; Taufik, A.; Asakura, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Zhu, J.; Shi, P.; Yin, S. CuO nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid nanocomposites for detection of toluene gas. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4755–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, P.; Zhao, Z.; Shao, Z.; Tian, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, B.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Shen, X. Highly selective NH3 gas sensor based on polypyrrole/Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites operating at room temperature. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 6168–6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Hu, Q.; Zhou, A. Synthesis and thermal stability of two-dimensional carbide MXene Ti3C2. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2015, 191, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, X.; Cheng, C.; Feng, S.; Yu, X.; Xia, L.; Song, H. Hierarchical porous nanorod@ core-shell α-Fe2O3/TiO2 microspheres: Synthesis, characterization, and gas-sensing applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 481, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pazniak, H.; Plugin, I.A.; Loes, M.J.; Inerbaev, T.M.; Burmistrov, I.N.; Gorshenkov, M.; Polcak, J.; Varezhnikov, A.S.; Kuznetsov, D.Z.; Bruns, M.; et al. Partially oxidized Ti3C2Tx MXenes for fast and selective detection of organic vapors at part-per-million concentrations. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 3195–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liang, S.; Li, J.; Wang, F.; Qin, J.; Lai, X.; Jiang, X. Highly sensitive acetone gas sensor based on ultrafine α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 238, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, B.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Sun, P.; Liu, F.; Shimanoe, K.; Yamazoe, N.; Lu, G. Enhanced gas sensing properties to acetone vapor achieved by α-Fe2O3 particles ameliorated with reduced graphene oxide sheets. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, B.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Q.; Song, P. Rational design of 1D/2D heterostructured ZnSnO3/ZnO/Ti3C2TX MXene nanocomposites for enhanced acetone gas sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 409, 135541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, T.; Liu, W.; Lv, T.; Ma, M.; Liu, Z.; Vasiliev, A.; Li, X. MXene/SnO2 heterojunction based chemical gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, S.J.; Koh, H.J.; Ren, C.E.; Kwon, O.; Maleski, K.; Cho, S.Y.; Anasori, B.; Kim, C.K.; Choi, Y.K.; Kim, J.; et al. Metallic Ti3C2Tx MXene gas sensors with ultrahigh signal-to-noise ratio. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jia, Q.; Ji, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sun, X.; Jin, Z. Rapid and selective detection of acetone using hierarchical ZnO gas sensor for hazardous odor markers application. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, Z.; Liu, H.; Tong, X.; Shen, W.; Chen, X.; Bloch, J.F. A low operating temperature and high performance sensor for H2S detection based on Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 heterojunction nanoparticles composite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 12695–12709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Hermawan, A.; Asakura, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Kumagai, H.; Kato, H.; Kakihana, M.; Zhu, J.; Yin, S. SnO-SnO2 modified two-dimensional MXene Ti3C2Tx for acetone gas sensor working at room temperature. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 73, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 24 02604 g001
Figure 1. A flowchart of the experimental methodology framework.
Figure 1. A flowchart of the experimental methodology framework.
Sensors 24 02604 g001
Sensors 24 02604 g002
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of Ti3AlC2 and Ti3C2Tx. (b) XRD patterns of the nanocomposites.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of Ti3AlC2 and Ti3C2Tx. (b) XRD patterns of the nanocomposites.
Sensors 24 02604 g002
Sensors 24 02604 g003
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) MXene, and (b,c) F/M-3 nanocomposites. (d) EDS mappings of F/M-3 nanocomposite.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) MXene, and (b,c) F/M-3 nanocomposites. (d) EDS mappings of F/M-3 nanocomposite.
Sensors 24 02604 g003
Sensors 24 02604 g004
Figure 4. (a) Survey XPS spectra of F/M-3 nanocomposites. (b) Fe 2p spectra of F/M-3 nanocomposites. (c) XPS C 1s and (d) Ti 2p spectra of F/M-3 and pure MXene.
Figure 4. (a) Survey XPS spectra of F/M-3 nanocomposites. (b) Fe 2p spectra of F/M-3 nanocomposites. (c) XPS C 1s and (d) Ti 2p spectra of F/M-3 and pure MXene.
Sensors 24 02604 g004
Sensors 24 02604 g005
Figure 5. (a) The response of all samples to 100 ppm of acetone at different temperatures. (b) The transient response to 5–100 ppm of acetone. (c) The transient response of pure α-Fe2O3 and F/M-3 sensors to acetone at relatively low concentrations. (d) The selectivity of F/M-3 at different concentrations at 220 °C. (e) The response of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at different levels of humidity. (f) The response and recovery times of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at 220 °C.
Figure 5. (a) The response of all samples to 100 ppm of acetone at different temperatures. (b) The transient response to 5–100 ppm of acetone. (c) The transient response of pure α-Fe2O3 and F/M-3 sensors to acetone at relatively low concentrations. (d) The selectivity of F/M-3 at different concentrations at 220 °C. (e) The response of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at different levels of humidity. (f) The response and recovery times of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at 220 °C.
Sensors 24 02604 g005
Sensors 24 02604 g006
Figure 6. The reproducibility (a) and long-term stability (b) of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at 220 °C.
Figure 6. The reproducibility (a) and long-term stability (b) of the F/M-3 sensor to 100 ppm of acetone at 220 °C.
Sensors 24 02604 g006
Sensors 24 02604 g007
Figure 7. (a) Schematic of the reaction between acetone and F/M nanocomposites. (b–e) Schematic diagram of the band structure of the F/M nanocomposites.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic of the reaction between acetone and F/M nanocomposites. (b–e) Schematic diagram of the band structure of the F/M nanocomposites.
Sensors 24 02604 g007
Table 1. Response and recovery times of F/M-3 to different concentrations of acetone at 220 °C.
Table 1. Response and recovery times of F/M-3 to different concentrations of acetone at 220 °C.
Concentration5 ppm15 ppm25 ppm35 ppm50 ppm100 ppm
Response time (s)1711109109
Recovery time (s)991010129
Table 2. Comparison of gas-sensing performance between our results and those reported in the previous literature.
Table 2. Comparison of gas-sensing performance between our results and those reported in the previous literature.
Sensing MaterialAcetone (ppm)T Sens (°C)ResponseRes/Rec
(s/s)		Ref.
α-Fe2O3100340 °C9.1/[36]
rGO/α-Fe2O3100225 °C13.9/[37]
ZnSnO3/ZnO/Ti3C2TX10012015.685/12[38]
MXene/SnO2 heterojunctions5023.50.8%/[39]
Partially oxidized Ti3C2Tx2350180%/[35]
Metallic Ti3C2Tx100RT0.9~0.1%/[40]
α-Fe2O3/TiO2@Ti3C2Tx nanocomposites10022034.6610/7This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Z.; Lv, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, B.; Shao, Z. α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposites for Enhanced Acetone Gas Sensors. Sensors 2024, 24, 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082604

AMA Style

Zhao Z, Lv Z, Chen Z, Zhou B, Shao Z. α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposites for Enhanced Acetone Gas Sensors. Sensors. 2024; 24(8):2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Zhihua, Zhenli Lv, Zhuo Chen, Baocang Zhou, and Zhigang Shao. 2024. "α-Fe2O3/TiO2/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposites for Enhanced Acetone Gas Sensors" Sensors 24, no. 8: 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop