Next Article in Journal
Novel Meta-Learning Techniques for the Multiclass Image Classification Problem
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Assessment of Functional Movement Screening Exercises with Deep Learning Architectures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Requirements, Limitations and Recommendations for Enabling End-to-End Quality of Context-Awareness in IoT Middleware
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Situation-Aware IoT Data Generation towards Performance Evaluation of IoT Middleware Platforms

Sensors 2023, 23(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010007
by Shalmoly Mondal 1, Prem Prakash Jayaraman 1,*, Pari Delir Haghighi 2, Alireza Hassani 1 and Dimitrios Georgakopoulos 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010007
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Context-Rich Interoperable IoT Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A novel situation aware IoT data generation framework has been proposed in this paper. The paper is well written, and it contains sufficient explanation and extensive experiments were conducted to justify the performance of the research. I recommend accepting this paper in its current form.

Author Response

We thank reviewer 1 for this positive feedback and recommending our manuscript be accepted for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

It’s also important if the author can summarize the advantages, and disadvantages of each related approach. Summarize the related works in a suitable table. Moreover, the research contribution in this paper must be made clear.

How to determine the fuzzy rules? The construction of fuzzy system is not explained well. How to prove/justify if the rule is valid or not? Is there any subjective judgement involved?

Please clarify whether the assumptions of the model are reasonable in reality.

The evaluation of the proposed model is too simple and is not comprehensive. More discussion, metrics, and comparison are necessary.

Author Response

Please kindly see the attachement.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This is an interesting manuscript with application. All concepts are correct mathematically. I have some comments to improve the quality of the paper:

(1) Abstract should be rewritten seriously. It is better to mention the resulting advantages of the presented method in the abstract.

(2) Please provide a clear description about how the proposed method is better than previously developed methods.

(3) Summaries the advantages and limitations of the proposed method in practical applications.

(4)The conclusions should be extended with more future work.

 

Author Response

Please kindly see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have made good revisions according to the comments of the anonymous reviewers.

Back to TopTop