Next Article in Journal
An Integrated Methodology for Bibliometric Analysis: A Case Study of Internet of Things in Healthcare Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Cost Photoreactor to Monitor Wastewater Pollutant Decomposition
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Characteristics of a ZnO Gas Sensor Using a Low-Dimensional Carbon Allotrope
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dust Particle Counter for Powder Bed Fusion Process
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 1
10.3390/s23010066
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Self-Referenced Refractive Index Sensor Based on Gold Nanoislands

by
Carlos Angulo Barrios
1,*,
Teona Mirea
2,* and
Miguel Huerga Represa
1
1
Department of Photonics and Bioengineering, CEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, CEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010066
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low-Cost Optical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report on a self-referenced refractive index optical sensor based on Au nanoislands. The device consists of a random distribution of Au nanoislands formed by dewetting on a planar SiO2/metal Fabry–Pérot cavity. Experimental and theoretical studies of the reflectance of this configuration reveal that its spectral response results from a combination of two resonances: a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) associated to the Au nanoislands and the lowest-order anti-symmetric resonance of the Fabry–Pérot cavity. When the device is immersed in different fluids, the LSPR contribution provides high sensitivity to refractive index variations of the fluid, whereas those refractive index changes have little impact on the Fabry–Pérot resonance wavelength, allowing its use as a reference signal. The self-referenced sensor exhibits a spectral sensitivity of 212 nm/RIU (RIU: refractive index unit), which is larger than those of similar structures, and an intensity sensitivity of 4.9 RIU−1. The proposed chip-based architecture and the low cost and simplicity of the Au nanoisland synthesis procedure make the demonstrated sensor a promising self-referenced plasmonic sensor for compact biosensing optical platforms based on reflection mode operation.

1. Introduction

Refractive index (RI) sensors find important applications in disease diagnostics, biochemical analysis, environmental monitoring, and the agro-food industry. Among the different types of refractometric sensors, those based on surface plasmons (SPs) have attracted considerable attention as they offer remarkable features such as high sensitivity, easy miniaturization and parallelization, and integration feasibility [1,2,3,4,5,6]. SPs are formed by interactions between incident photons and free electrons on metal surfaces. Electromagnetic fields associated with SPs are strongly enhanced and confined to the metal surface, which makes the SP properties highly sensitive to variations of the RI of surrounding materials.
Most plasmonic RI sensors are based on the measurement of resonances related to either surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) on thin metal films [1,3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] or localized surface plasmons (LPS) on metal nanoparticles (NPs) [14,15,16,17,18]. SPP resonance measurements are traditionally carried out in the reflection mode using the Kretschmann or prism-based configuration [1,3,7,8,9], although other arrangements, such as optical waveguides and diffraction gratings, have been also reported [10,11,12,13]. SPP-based sensors have demonstrated good performance for refractometric monitoring; however, either large, complicated, and expensive optical equipment or highly specialized fabrication procedures are required. LSP-based sensors have also proved their suitability as RI sensors in numerous applications and can be integrated with microfluidic systems for lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices. The optical intensity and spectral position of the LSP resonance band of a metal NP are characteristic of the type of material (typically, gold, silver, or platinum), size, distribution and shape of the nanostructure. Thus, the plasmonic properties of metal NPs can be tailored to meet the requirements of different applications, which is a major advantage of LSP-based sensors over SPP-based sensors. In addition, LSP sensors require simple and cost-effective readout equipment, such as a conventional spectrophotometer.
LSP-based RI sensing devices are usually implemented by using either colloidal solutions of metal NPs or chip-based designs in which nanostructures or nanoparticles are attached to a planar substrate. The chip-based approach has important advantages such as easier multiplexed analysis and integration with electronic and microfluidic systems. Chip-based LSP sensors can be fabricated by several means that can be classified into two general groups: lithography-based and lithography-free processes. Nanolithography techniques, such as electron beam lithography [19] and nanoimprint lithography [20], allow controlled positioning and dimensioning of nanostructures according to a specific pattern; however, they typically require multiple processing steps and complex, expensive processing facilities. On the other hand, lithography-free nanofabrication processes, such as colloidal nanoparticle deposition [21,22,23,24] and dewetting [25,26,27,28,29,30], typically result in a low-ordered or random distribution of nanoparticles, which exhibit significant size dispersion; nevertheless, they are simpler and lower-cost fabrication alternatives. In particular, thermal dewetting by annealing of thin metal films [25,26,27,28,29,30] is one of the easiest and cheapest methods to produce metal nanostructures on solid substrates. This process leads to the formation of metal nanostructures, usually called nanoislands, due to the dewetting or agglomeration of a thin metal layer occurring at an annealing temperature below the melting point of the metal while the film remains in a solid state [25]. Nanoislands dewetted from thin metal films can be massively formed at a wafer level and exhibit substrate-dependent plasmonic phenomena in a broad spectral range from ultraviolet to infrared [30].
Independently of the principle (SPP or LSP) on which a plasmonic RI sensor is based, external factors, such as vibrations and intensity fluctuations, may affect the sensing accuracy. To mitigate this issue, a variety of self-referenced RI plasmonic sensors have been proposed [31,32,33,34,35,36]. These are mostly based on the generation of independent multiple resonances with different sensitivities to the refractive index of the surrounding medium. In spectral interrogation schemes, self-referencing relies on finding the difference between the wavelengths of a resonance highly sensitive to the RI of the sample of interest and a reference resonance that is scarcely sensitive to changes of the sample RI. In intensity interrogation schemes, self-referencing is typically achieved by obtaining the quotient between the intensities of two resonances, both equally affected by light intensity fluctuations. Reported self-referenced plasmonic RI sensors include prism-based configurations [31,32] and grating-based structures [33,34,35,36]; however, to our knowledge, no self-referenced RI sensors based on metal nanoislands have been reported so far.
In this work, we propose and demonstrate a chip-based self-referenced refractive index plasmonic sensor based on Au nanoislands. The device consists of a random distribution of Au nanoislands formed on a semi-open SiO2/metal Fabry–Pérot cavity. Au nanoparticle LSP resonance provides spectral sensitivity to RI changes of the test sample, whereas the Fabry–Pérot structure leads to a resonance wavelength slightly affected by those RI variations, which makes it suitable as a reference. Au nanoislands have been fabricated using the low-cost and simple thermal annealing technique, and the device has been optically interrogated in reflection mode. A theoretical analysis based on finite difference time domain (FDTD) calculations has been also achieved in order to elucidate the physical origin of the measured spectral response.

2. Experimental Section

Au nanoislands were synthesized on a SiO2/Ti/Mo multilayer structure by thermal annealing. First, the multilayer was created on a Si substrate by subsequent deposition of a 10 nm-thick Ti layer, a 150 nm-thick Mo layer, a 10 nm-thick Ti layer and a 100 nm-thick SiO2 layer. All these layers were deposited in a DC-pulsed reactive sputtering system at 150 W with 5.4 mBar, 400 W with 0.7 mBar, and 1200 W with 3.3 mbar, for Ti, Mo, and SiO2, respectively. Next, a 15 nm-thick Au film was deposited on the SiO2 layer by Joule evaporation at a 5 Å/s rate. Finally, a thermal annealing process was carried out in a quartz oven for 2 h at 475 °C in an air atmosphere. Figure 1a,b show a schematic diagram and a top-view scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of the fabricated configuration, respectively. Figure 1b reveals that the formed Au nanoislands are randomly distributed and have an average size of approximately 100 nm (inset) and a surface density of approximately 60 nanoparticles/μm2.
The fabricated device was optically characterized in reflection mode, as schematically illustrated in Figure 1c. A collimated light beam from a tungsten-halogen lamp (Thorlabs SLS201L) was used to illuminate normally the surface containing the Au nanoislands by using a cube beam splitter. Light reflected from the device was collected by an optical fiber and spectrally analyzed by a monochromator (Thorlabs CCS200). Reflection from an Al mirror was used as a reference for determining the relative specular reflectance of the device. Refractive index sensing characterization was carried out at room temperature by immersing the device in air (RI = 1), distilled water (RI = 1.333), ethanol (RI = 1.362), isopropanol (RI = 1.375), and glycerol (RI = 1.465) inside a fluidic cell. The refractive indexes of the liquids were measured with an Abbe refractometer. The sensor response repeatability was determined by acquiring five consecutive measurements for each refractive index. The sensor response reproducibility was addressed by obtaining 20 pairs of measurements, each pair consisting of measuring first in air, and next in distilled water. After each air-water measurement sequence, the chip sensor was removed from the characterization setup, cleaned with compressed air, and placed again on the setup holder for a subsequent measurement pair.

3. Optical Simulations

Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the simulated configuration. Hemispherical Au nanoparticles of diameter D are arranged in a square array of period P. The Au nanoparticles rest on a 100 nm-thick SiO2 layer, which lies on a 10 nm-thick Ti layer deposited on a semi-infinite Mo substrate. The structure is surrounded by a bulk material (test sample) of refractive index nB. The frequency dependent dielectric constant of Au, Ti, and Mo was modeled by the well-known Drude−Lorentz equation with the fitted parameters reported in the literature [37,38]. The dielectric constant of SiO2 was assumed to be frequency-independent and equal to 1.455. The reflection spectrum and field calculations of the modeled device were calculated by the FDTD algorithm [39]. Periodic boundary conditions were chosen along the device plane coordinates (x- and y-axis) and perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition was used along the incident-beam propagation direction (z-axis), normal to the device plane. The grid of the simulation domain was non-uniform, with grid size = 5 nm in the bulk regions and grid size = 1 nm near material interfaces in the x-, y-, and z-axis. Frequency analysis of the reflection was achieved by launching a pulsed excitation from the top region towards the Au nanoislands and calculating the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the reflected time-domain field component (Ex) on a plane above the nanoislands.

4. Results

Figure 3 shows the measured spectral reflectance (R) of the fabricated device in the 500–900 nm spectral range when exposed to air (black line), water (red line), ethanol (blue line), isopropanol (green line), and glycerol (magenta line). It can be observed that all curves exhibit a dip at approximately 540 nm wavelength and a broad band or “hill” at longer wavelengths. Note that the dip wavelength (λMIN) is scarcely affected by the fluid refractive index, whereas the spectral hills appear to shift to the red as the refractive index of the fluid increases. Spectral shifts are typically recorded by monitoring the wavelength corresponding to a maximum or a minimum of the device response. In the measured curves of Figure 3, no clear maximum value is observed, particularly when the device is exposed to liquids, due to the non-smooth variation of the reflectance at the top of the hills. To circumvent this issue, the experimental curves were fitted by third degree polynomial functions in the 560–900 nm spectral range, and the wavelengths corresponding to the maximum reflectance values of the fittings (λMAX) were used to quantify the redshift. Figure 4 shows the experimental curves normalized to R(λMIN) and the corresponding polynomial fittings. Figure 4 depicts both the little impact of the fluid refractive index on the dip spectral position and the redshift of the spectral bands.
Figure 5 shows the variations of λMAX and λMIN with the fluid refractive index. Linear fittings of the data led to sensitivity values of 212 nm/RIU and 9 nm/RIU for λMAX and λMIN, respectively. That is, the sensitivity of λMAX to the bulk refractive index is 23 times greater than that of λMIN. This large sensitivity ratio allows the use of λMAX and λMIN as the sensing and reference signals, respectively. For the sake of comparison, Sun et al. [35] proposed and modeled a self-referenced RI sensor based on a dielectric-metal 2D grating structure displaying a sensing-to-reference sensitivity ratio of 15, which is smaller than that of our device. The RI resolution or limit of detection (LOD) can be defined as LOD = 3σ/S, where S is the sensitivity and σ is the standard deviation for the blank sample (distilled water for aqueous solutions). From five consecutive measurements, σ turned out to be equal to 0.2 nm, which indicates an LOD of 3 × 10−3 RIU at the refractive index of water. The reproducibility study revealed measurement uncertainties (standard deviations) of 0.6 nm and 5.4 nm for λMIN and λMAX, respectively, in the case of air, and 0.5 nm and 4.2 nm, respectively, in the case of distilled water.
Figure 4 also shows a clear increment of the magnitude of the normalized band reflectance with the fluid refractive index. This suggests an alternative method to monitor the bulk refractive index. In this case, the analytical signal could be defined as R(λS)/R(λMIN), where λS is a wavelength within the spectral hill at which the reflectance varies significantly with nB; for example, λS = λMAX. Note that the effect of intensity variations of the light source can be highly reduced by using this relative measurement, since both R(λS) and R(λMIN) would be equally affected. Figure 6 plots R(λMAX)/R(λMIN) as a function of the fluid refractive index. The experimental data points have been fitted by a single exponential function (dashed line). Assuming a linear variation around the refractive index of water, the RI sensitivity equals 4.9 RIU−1. From five consecutive measurements, σ = 0.003, which leads to an LOD of 2.4 × 10−3 RIU, which is similar to that obtained by monitoring spectral shifts.
FDTD calculations were carried out in order to gain insight into the nature of the measured spectral reflectance. The FDTD-calculated spectral reflection of the modeled configuration (Figure 2) for D = 100 nm, P = 130 nm, and nB = 1 is shown in Figure 7 (black line). As with the corresponding experimental curve, two relevant spectral features are observed: a dip with its minimum at λMIN = 521.5 nm and a broad band or hill with its maximum at λMAX = 697 nm. The spectral reflections of three related planar structures were also calculated and plotted in Figure 7: a 100 nm-thick SiO2 layer on Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (blue line), a 15 nm-thick Au film on SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (green line), and a square lattice (period = 130 nm) of 100 nm diameter hemispherical Au NPs on a SiO2 substrate (red line). It can be observed that both the SiO2/Ti/Mo and Au/SiO2/Ti/Mo structures show a reflection minimum at 663.6 nm and 524.3 nm, respectively. These dips can be attributed to the lowest order Fabry–Pérot resonance of the cavity formed by the SiO2 layer and the high reflective metal substrate (Ti/Mo). Note that the presence of a thin film of Au on the SiO2 layer increases the reflectance of the top surface of the Fabry–Pérot cavity, leading to a deeper and narrower resonance reflection dip. On the other hand, the Au NP/SiO2 structure exhibits a reflection peak at 699 nm wavelength, which can be attributed to an LSP resonance of the Au NPs [40]. These responses indicate that the Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration supports an LSP resonance associated with the Au NPs in the vicinity of the lowest order resonance of the SiO2/metal Fabry–Pérot nanocavity. Thus, its overall response could be understood as the interaction or hybridization between those two basic resonance modes [41].
To corroborate the previous statements concerning the origin of the spectral features of interest, the electric field (Ex) distributions of the Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration at λMIN = 521.5 nm and λMAX = 697 nm were calculated and shown in Figure 8a,b, respectively. Figure 8c shows an x-cut (x = 0) of the 2D field distribution of Figure 8a. It is shown in Figure 8c that the field intensity profile at λMIN = 521.5 nm decays monotonically in the SiO2 layer, which is characteristic of an anti-symmetric Fabry–Pérot resonance [42]. The absence of nodes indicates that only the lowest order Fabry–Pérot mode is involved. On the other hand, Figure 8b shows that the Ex field intensity at λMAX = 697 nm is highly enhanced at the right and left edges of the Au NP, which is a typical behavior of an LSP resonance.
Further corroboration is provided by Figure 9, which plots the calculated spectral reflection of the proposed configuration for different Au NP diameters (D), ranging from 80 to 120 nm. In all cases the period of the NP array equals 130 nm. Figure 9 shows that the NP diameter affects both λMAX and λMIN. λMAX increases as D increases, as expected from an LSP resonance associated to a metal NP [28]. On the other hand, λMIN decreases as D increases, in agreement with the performance of an Au/SiO2/Ti/Mo Fabry–Pérot cavity in which the reflectivity of the Au/SiO2 interface increases due to the increment of the filling factor of the Au NP array. The effect of D variation on λMAX is more significant than that on λMIN; this is because the latter is also highly dependent on the thickness of the SiO2 layer, which is constant. This may explain the greater measurement uncertainty of λMAX (~4–5 nm), compared with that of λMIN (~0.5–0.6 nm), obtained in the reproducibility study of the actual device. In those experiments, described in Section 2, repositioning of the sensor chip between measurements might lead to small deviations of the sensor position in the XY plane from one measurement to another. This would modify the Au NP size distribution illuminated by the interrogation beam and, therefore, introduce greater uncertainty in the measure of λMAX, which is more sensitive to the NP size than λMIN.
Figure 10 shows the calculated spectral reflection of the modeled configuration for different values of the bulk refractive index. It is seen that the shapes of the calculated curves resemble those obtained experimentally. The dip spectral position is not greatly affected by nB variations, as expected, since the electric field at the Fabry–Pérot resonance wavelength is mainly confined in the SiO2 layer. On the other hand, the reflection maximum, related to the LSP resonance of the Au NPs, displays a significant variation with nB because of the interaction of the electric field with the surrounding bulk material. Figure 11 shows the variations of the calculated λMAX and λMIN as a function of nB. The resulting bulk refractive index sensitivities were 187 nm/RIU and 12 nm/RIU for λMAX and λMIN, respectively, which compare well with the corresponding experimental values.

5. Discussion

RI sensitivities exhibited by reported LSP sensors based on Au NPs deposited on non-layered conventional supports, such as Si, SiO2, and Si3N4, are around 20–60 nm/RIU [24,26,29]. As demonstrated by Ferhan et al. [43] and in this work, greater sensitivities can be achieved by using a highly reflective substrate and conducting LSP resonance measurements in reflection mode. In particular, the RI sensitivity reported in [43] was 150 nm/RIU. The sensor demonstrated here shows higher sensitivity and offers self-referencing functionality. Although the monitored RI-sensitive spectral band is wide and non-smooth, a simple polynomial fit of the measured curve provides a reliable method to quantify the spectral shifts. In addition, reflection mode interrogation allows the integration of plasmonic Au nanoislands on structures containing opaque metal electrodes. For example, Au nanoislands could be synthesized on the top electrode of a conventional quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor with minimal modification for simultaneous electro-acoustic and optical biosensing [43].
It should be also noted that the simulated device consists of an ordered array of Au hemispheres of fixed diameter, whereas the experimental device is formed by randomly distributed Au nanoislands of non-uniform size and shape. This may explain the non-smooth and wider bands exhibited by the experimental configuration (Figure 3 and Figure 4) as compared to those of the modeled device (Figure 10). In particular, the numerous nanogaps of different lengths formed by adjacent metal nanoislands in the fabricated structure can lead to interparticle coupling effects that can be manifested as a broader and non-smooth spectral band [28,30]. Nevertheless, despite these morphological differences, both structures exhibit similar spectral responses and comparable RI sensitivities for both the reference and the sensing signals. This makes the proposed theoretical model suitable for design optimization of Au nanoisland-based sensor architectures. Furthermore, it suggests that a simple and cost-effective fabrication method such as thermal annealing can produce devices with similar performance as those manufactured by using expensive and complex nanolithography techniques.

6. Conclusions

A self-referenced refractive index sensor based on Au nanoislands deposited on a semi-open SiO2/metal Fabry–Pérot nanocavity has been proposed and demonstrated. Au nanoislands have been synthesized on a SiO2/metal support by thermal dewetting. Both experimental measurements and computer simulations reveal that the reflectance of the device results from the combination of two resonance phenomena: a Fabry–Pérot resonance associated with the SiO2/metal nanocavity and an LSP resonance related to the Au nanoislands. The former/latter is minimally/highly sensitive to bulk refractive index variations and can therefore be used as a reference/sensing signal. The sensitivity of the fabricated device is 212 nm/RIU, which is higher than that of similar configurations based on Au nanoparticles deposited on planar substrates, while offering the additional advantage of self-referencing. These performance improvements and the low cost and simplicity of the Au nanoislands synthesis procedure make the demonstrated device a promising plasmonic sensor for integration into chip-based biosensing optical platforms, particularly in those containing thick metal layers that require reflection mode operation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.B. and T.M.; methodology, C.A.B. and T.M.; device fabrication, M.H.R. and T.M.; device characterization, M.H.R. and C.A.B.; simulations, C.A.B.; formal analysis, C.A.B. and T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.B.; writing—review and editing, C.A.B. and T.M.; supervision, C.A.B. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the R&D National Plan of the Spanish Government (PID-2020-118410RB-C22) and by the Comunidad de Madrid through the call Research Grants for Young Investigators from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ricardo Hervás García for his assistance during device fabrication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Homola, J. Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Anker, J.N.; Hall, W.P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N.C.; Zhao, J.; van Duyne, R.P. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Piliarik, M.; Vaisocherová, H.; Homola, J. Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing. In Biosensors and Biodetection. Methods in Molecular Biology; Rasooly, A., Herold, K.E., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2009; Volume 503, pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hill, R.T. Plasmonic biosensors. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 7, 152–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mejía-Salazar, J.R.; Oliveira, J.O.N. Plasmonic Biosensing. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10617–10625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamza, M.E.; Othman, M.A.; Swillam, M.A. Plasmonic Biosensors: Review. Biology 2022, 11, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Homola, J. Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  8. Piliarik, M.; Homola, J. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors: Approaching their limits? Opt. Express 2009, 17, 16505–16517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, J.-H.; Cho, Y.-W.; Kim, T.-H. Recent Advances in Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Sensitive Optical Detection of Pathogens. Biosensors 2022, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harris, R.; Wilkinson, J. Waveguide surface plasmon resonance sensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 1995, 29, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cullen, D.; Brown, R.; Lowe, C.R. Detection of immuno-complex formation via surface plasmon resonance on gold-coated diffraction gratings. Biosensors 1988, 3, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jory, M.; Vukusic, P.; Sambles, J. Development of a prototype gas sensor using surface plasmon resonance on gratings. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 1994, 17, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rossi, S.; Gazzola, E.; Capaldo, P.; Borile, G.; Romanato, F. Grating-Coupled Surface Plasmon Resonance (GC-SPR) Optimization for Phase-Interrogation Biosensing in a Microfluidic Chamber. Sensors 2018, 18, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kedem, O.; Vaskevich, A.; Rubinstein, I. Critical Issues in Localized Plasmon Sensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 8227–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Unser, S.; Bruzas, I.; He, J.; Sagle, L. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing: Current Challenges and Approaches. Sensors 2015, 15, 15684–15716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Haes, A.; Van Duyne, R.P. A unified view of propagating and localized surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 379, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lereu, A.L.; Farahi, R.H.; Tetard, L.; Enoch, S.; Thundat, T.; Passian, A. Plasmon assisted thermal modulation in nanoparticles. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 12145–12158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mayer, K.M.; Hafner, J.H. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3828–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cinel, N.A.; Bütün, S.; Özbay, E. Electron beam lithography designed silver nano-disks used as label free nano-biosensors based on localized surface plasmon resonance. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, S.-W.; Lee, K.-S.; Ahn, J.; Lee, J.-J.; Kim, M.-G.; Shin, Y.-B. Highly Sensitive Biosensing Using Arrays of Plasmonic Au Nanodisks Realized by Nanoimprint Lithography. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Okamoto, T.; Yamaguchi, I.; Kobayashi, T. Local plasmon sensor with gold colloid monolayers deposited upon glass substrates. Opt. Lett. 2000, 25, 372–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nazri, N.A.A.; Azeman, N.H.; Abu Bakar, M.H.; Mobarak, N.N.; Luo, Y.; Arsad, N.; Aziz, T.H.T.A.; Zain, A.R.M.; Bakar, A.A.A. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Decorated with Carbon Quantum Dots and Triangular Ag Nanoparticles for Chlorophyll Detection. Nanomaterials 2021, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ryu, K.R.; Kim, G.W.; Ha, J.W. Localized surface plasmon resonance inflection points for improved detection of chemisorption of 1-alkanethiols under total internal reflection scattering microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bin Jeon, H.; Tsalu, P.; Ha, J.W. Shape Effect on the Refractive Index Sensitivity at Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Inflection Points of Single Gold Nanocubes with Vertices. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Thompson, C.V. Solid-State Dewetting of Thin Films. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2012, 42, 399–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ozhikandathil, J.; Badilescu, S.; Packirisamy, M. Gold nanoisland structures integrated in a lab-on-a-chip for plasmonic detection of bovine growth hormone. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17, 077001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jia, K.; Bijeon, J.-L.; Adam, P.-M.; Ionescu, R.E. Large Scale Fabrication of Gold Nano-Structured Substrates Via High Temperature Annealing and Their Direct Use for the LSPR Detection of Atrazine. Plasmonics 2013, 8, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ozhikandathil, J.; Packirisamy, M. Simulation and Implementation of a Morphology-Tuned Gold Nano-Islands Integrated Plasmonic Sensor. Sensors 2014, 14, 10497–10513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bhalla, N.; Jain, A.; Lee, Y.; Shen, A.Q.; Lee, D. Dewetting Metal Nanofilms—Effect of Substrate on Refractive Index Sensitivity of Nanoplasmonic Gold. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chung, T.; Lee, Y.; Ahn, M.-S.; Lee, W.; Bae, S.-I.; Hwang, C.S.H.; Jeong, K.-H. Nanoislands as plasmonic materials. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 8651–8664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hastings, J.T.; Guo, J.; Keathley, P.D.; Kumaresh, P.B.; Wei, Y.; Law, S.; Bachas, L. Optimal self-referenced sensing using long- and short- range surface plasmons. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 17661–17672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Srivastava, S.K.; Verma, R.; Gupta, B.D. Theoretical modeling of a self-referenced dual mode SPR sensor utilizing indium tin oxide film. Opt. Commun. 2016, 369, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Sun, C.; Li, H.; Gong, Q.; Chen, J. Self-reference plasmonic sensors based on double Fano resonances. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 11085–11092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sharma, A.K.; Pandey A., K. Self-referenced plasmonic sensor with TiO2 grating on thin Au layer: simulated performance analysis in optical communication band. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, F25–F31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, P.; Zhou, C.; Jia, W.; Wang, J.; Xiang, C.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, D. Self-referenced refractive index sensor based on hybrid mode resonances in 2D metal-dielectric grating. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 53, 145101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, M.; Zhang, P.; Shen, J.; Li, C. Self-referenced refractive index sensor based on double-dips method with bimetal-dielectric and double-groove grating. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 8376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rakić, A.D.; Djurišić, A.B.; Elazar, J.M.; Majewski, M.L. Optical properties of metallic films for vertical-cavity optoelectronic devices. Appl. Opt. 1998, 37, 5271–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Technical Note. Drude Dispersion Model. Horiba. Available online: https://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/Downloads/OpticalSchool_CN/TN/ellipsometer/Drude_Dispersion_Model.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2022).
  39. Rsoft Photonic Device Tools. Available online: https://www.synopsys.com/photonic-solutions/rsoft-photonic-device-tools.html (accessed on 21 December 2022).
  40. Huang, K.; Pan, W.; Zhu, J.F.; Li, J.C.; Gao, N.; Liu, C.; Ji, L.; Yu, E.T.; Kang, J. Asymmetric light reflectance from metal nanoparticle arrays on dielectric surfaces. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sun, Z.; Fang, Y. Fabry-Pérot Interference Cavity Length Tuned by Plasmonic Nanoparticle Metasurface for Nanophotonic Device Design. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 10732–10738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hägglund, C.; Zeltzer, G.; Ruiz, R.; Wangperawong, A.; Roelofs, K.E.; Bent, S.F. Strong Coupling of Plasmon and Nanocavity Modes for Dual-Band, Near-Perfect Absorbers and Ultrathin Photovoltaics. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ferhan, A.R.; Jackman, J.A.; Cho, N.-J. Integration of Quartz Crystal Microbalance-Dissipation and Reflection-Mode Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Biomacromolecular Interaction Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 12524–12531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 23 00066 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic view of the fabricated Au nanoisland/Fabry–Pérot cavity self-referenced refractive index sensor; (b) SEM top view of the fabricated device after thermal annealing revealing the formation of Au nanoislands (bright regions). Inset shows the size distribution histogram (bars) and normal function fit (line) of 300 Au NPs; (c) schematic diagram of the spectral reflectance measurement setup.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic view of the fabricated Au nanoisland/Fabry–Pérot cavity self-referenced refractive index sensor; (b) SEM top view of the fabricated device after thermal annealing revealing the formation of Au nanoislands (bright regions). Inset shows the size distribution histogram (bars) and normal function fit (line) of 300 Au NPs; (c) schematic diagram of the spectral reflectance measurement setup.
Sensors 23 00066 g001
Sensors 23 00066 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematics of the modeled self-referenced plasmonic sensor based on Au nanoislands. The sensor is interrogated in reflection mode; (b) schematic cross-sectional view of the simulated device. The thickness of the SiO2 layer, tSiO2, equals 100 nm.
Figure 2. (a) Schematics of the modeled self-referenced plasmonic sensor based on Au nanoislands. The sensor is interrogated in reflection mode; (b) schematic cross-sectional view of the simulated device. The thickness of the SiO2 layer, tSiO2, equals 100 nm.
Sensors 23 00066 g002
Sensors 23 00066 g003 550
Figure 3. Spectral reflectance of the fabricated device when exposed to different fluids: air (black line), water (red line), ethanol (blue line), isopropanol (green line), and glycerol (magenta line).
Figure 3. Spectral reflectance of the fabricated device when exposed to different fluids: air (black line), water (red line), ethanol (blue line), isopropanol (green line), and glycerol (magenta line).
Sensors 23 00066 g003
Sensors 23 00066 g004 550
Figure 4. Spectral reflectance curves for different fluids normalized to the reflectance minimum (solid lines) and corresponding third degree polynomial fittings in the 560–900 nm wavelength range (dotted lines). Vertical dashed lines indicate the spectral position of the maximum reflectance (λMAX) of the fittings for each fluid. λMIN denotes the reflectance dip wavelength.
Figure 4. Spectral reflectance curves for different fluids normalized to the reflectance minimum (solid lines) and corresponding third degree polynomial fittings in the 560–900 nm wavelength range (dotted lines). Vertical dashed lines indicate the spectral position of the maximum reflectance (λMAX) of the fittings for each fluid. λMIN denotes the reflectance dip wavelength.
Sensors 23 00066 g004
Sensors 23 00066 g005 550
Figure 5. Variation of λMAX and λMIN as a function of the fluid refractive index (nB). Dashed lines represent linear fits of the measured data points. Error bars are smaller than dots.
Figure 5. Variation of λMAX and λMIN as a function of the fluid refractive index (nB). Dashed lines represent linear fits of the measured data points. Error bars are smaller than dots.
Sensors 23 00066 g005
Sensors 23 00066 g006 550
Figure 6. Normalized reflectance R(λMAX)/R(λMIN) as a function of the fluid refractive index (nB). Dashed line represents an exponential fit of the measured data points. Error bars are smaller than dots.
Figure 6. Normalized reflectance R(λMAX)/R(λMIN) as a function of the fluid refractive index (nB). Dashed line represents an exponential fit of the measured data points. Error bars are smaller than dots.
Sensors 23 00066 g006
Sensors 23 00066 g007 550
Figure 7. Calculated spectral reflection for different multilayer configurations: SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (blue line), Au (15 nm)/SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (green line), Au NP (100 nm diameter)/SiO2 substrate (red line), and Au NP (100 nm diameter)/SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (black line). In all cases nB = 1 (air).
Figure 7. Calculated spectral reflection for different multilayer configurations: SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (blue line), Au (15 nm)/SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (green line), Au NP (100 nm diameter)/SiO2 substrate (red line), and Au NP (100 nm diameter)/SiO2 (100 nm)/Ti (10 nm)/Mo substrate (black line). In all cases nB = 1 (air).
Sensors 23 00066 g007
Sensors 23 00066 g008a 550Sensors 23 00066 g008b 550
Figure 8. Calculated electric field (Ex) distribution at λMIN = 521.5 nm (a) and λMAX = 697 nm (b) of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration in the XZ plane; (c) x-cut along x = 0 of (a).
Figure 8. Calculated electric field (Ex) distribution at λMIN = 521.5 nm (a) and λMAX = 697 nm (b) of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration in the XZ plane; (c) x-cut along x = 0 of (a).
Sensors 23 00066 g008aSensors 23 00066 g008b
Sensors 23 00066 g009 550
Figure 9. Calculated spectral reflections of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration for different values of the Au NP diameter (D). The array period (P) equals 130 nm.
Figure 9. Calculated spectral reflections of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration for different values of the Au NP diameter (D). The array period (P) equals 130 nm.
Sensors 23 00066 g009
Sensors 23 00066 g010 550
Figure 10. Calculated spectral reflections of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration for different values of the bulk refractive index nB.
Figure 10. Calculated spectral reflections of the modeled Au NP/SiO2/Ti/Mo configuration for different values of the bulk refractive index nB.
Sensors 23 00066 g010
Sensors 23 00066 g011 550
Figure 11. Calculated λMAX and λMIN variations as a function of the bulk refractive index (nB).
Figure 11. Calculated λMAX and λMIN variations as a function of the bulk refractive index (nB).
Sensors 23 00066 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrios, C.A.; Mirea, T.; Represa, M.H. A Self-Referenced Refractive Index Sensor Based on Gold Nanoislands. Sensors 2023, 23, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010066

AMA Style

Barrios CA, Mirea T, Represa MH. A Self-Referenced Refractive Index Sensor Based on Gold Nanoislands. Sensors. 2023; 23(1):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barrios, Carlos Angulo, Teona Mirea, and Miguel Huerga Represa. 2023. "A Self-Referenced Refractive Index Sensor Based on Gold Nanoislands" Sensors 23, no. 1: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop