Next Article in Journal
Design of a Robust System Architecture for Tracking Vehicle on Highway Based on Monocular Camera
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accuracy Report on a Handheld 3D Ultrasound Scanner Prototype Based on a Standard Ultrasound Machine and a Spatial Pose Reading Sensor

1
Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Computer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Chifor Research SRL, 400068 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Anatomy Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5
Department of Medical Education, Division of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(9), 3358; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093358
Submission received: 4 March 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a 3D ultrasound scanning method. The main requirements were the freehand architecture of the scanner and high accuracy of the reconstructions. A quantitative evaluation of a freehand 3D ultrasound scanner prototype was performed, comparing the ultrasonographic reconstructions with the CAD (computer-aided design) model of the scanned object, to determine the accuracy of the result. For six consecutive scans, the 3D ultrasonographic reconstructions were scaled and aligned with the model. The mean distance between the 3D objects ranged between 0.019 and 0.05 mm and the standard deviation between 0.287 mm and 0.565 mm. Despite some inherent limitations of our study, the quantitative evaluation of the 3D ultrasonographic reconstructions showed comparable results to other studies performed on smaller areas of the scanned objects, demonstrating the future potential of the developed prototype.
Keywords: 3D ultrasonography; freehand 3D ultrasound scanner prototype; quantitative 3D reconstruction evaluation; 2D image segmentation; pose sensor; coordinate measuring machine 3D ultrasonography; freehand 3D ultrasound scanner prototype; quantitative 3D reconstruction evaluation; 2D image segmentation; pose sensor; coordinate measuring machine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chifor, R.; Marita, T.; Arsenescu, T.; Santoma, A.; Badea, A.F.; Colosi, H.A.; Badea, M.-E.; Chifor, I. Accuracy Report on a Handheld 3D Ultrasound Scanner Prototype Based on a Standard Ultrasound Machine and a Spatial Pose Reading Sensor. Sensors 2022, 22, 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093358

AMA Style

Chifor R, Marita T, Arsenescu T, Santoma A, Badea AF, Colosi HA, Badea M-E, Chifor I. Accuracy Report on a Handheld 3D Ultrasound Scanner Prototype Based on a Standard Ultrasound Machine and a Spatial Pose Reading Sensor. Sensors. 2022; 22(9):3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chifor, Radu, Tiberiu Marita, Tudor Arsenescu, Andrei Santoma, Alexandru Florin Badea, Horatiu Alexandru Colosi, Mindra-Eugenia Badea, and Ioana Chifor. 2022. "Accuracy Report on a Handheld 3D Ultrasound Scanner Prototype Based on a Standard Ultrasound Machine and a Spatial Pose Reading Sensor" Sensors 22, no. 9: 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093358

APA Style

Chifor, R., Marita, T., Arsenescu, T., Santoma, A., Badea, A. F., Colosi, H. A., Badea, M.-E., & Chifor, I. (2022). Accuracy Report on a Handheld 3D Ultrasound Scanner Prototype Based on a Standard Ultrasound Machine and a Spatial Pose Reading Sensor. Sensors, 22(9), 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop