Next Article in Journal
Detection of Green Asparagus Using Improved Mask R-CNN for Automatic Harvesting
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Investigations into Using Motion Capture State Feedback for Real-Time Control of a Humanoid Robot
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Fabrication of Interdigital Supercapacitors as Force/Acceleration Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Approach for Extracting High-Level B-Spline Features from LIDAR Data for Light-Weight Mapping
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Smooth Complete Coverage Trajectory Planning Algorithm for a Nonholonomic Robot

Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9269; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239269
by Ana Šelek, Marija Seder *, Mišel Brezak and Ivan Petrović
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9269; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239269
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Sensors Technologies Applied in Mobile Robot)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a CCPP algorithm which generates smooth complete coverage paths that allow nonholonomic mobile robots to move in optimal time. My comments:

1.- The nature of this work is interesting

2.- However, the section 5 only present very little information. The analysis is highly insufficient, and lacks of scientific/experimental evaluation.

3. No comparison presented in the paper. Is there any comparison made to the existing method?

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, a planning algorithm based on stereo algorithm to generate smooth complete coverage path is proposed, which allows nonholonomic mobile robots to move along the path, which is a very interesting and attractive algorithm.

The following are some issues which are deserved the authors to concern on.

1)    Whether the pseudo code of the algorithm can be provided for reading.

2)    how about robustness of the proposed method?

3)    In the dynamic situation, such as the sudden fire in the building and other special situations, whether the algorithm is effective, and whether the robot can move without collision.

4)The authors may make more comparisons with similar methods, such as the methods in the paper An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Partitioning via Deterministic Annealing Neural Network;Solving the Production Transportation Problem via a Deterministic Annealing Neural Network Method.

5)    A complex figure is given in Section 4.2, which deserves more explanation.

 

6)    Some sentences should be polished carefully in order to improve the readability.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop